SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES

Simulation and fabrication of thin film bulk acoustic wave resonator

Xixi Han, Yi Ou, Zhigang Li, Wen Ou, Dapeng Chen and Tianchun Ye

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Ou Yi, Email: ouyi@ime.ac.cn

PDF

Abstract: In this paper, we present the simulation and fabrication of a thin film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR). In order to improve the accuracy of simulation, an improved Mason model was introduced to design the resonator by taking the coupling effect between electrode and substrate into consideration. The resonators were fabricated by the eight inch CMOS process, and the measurements show that the improved Mason model is more accurate than a simple Mason model. The Qs (Q at series resonance), Qp (Q at parallel resonance), Qmax and kt2 of the FBAR were measured to be 695, 814, 1049, and 7.01% respectively, showing better performance than previous reports.

Key words: FBARresonatorimproved Mason modelsurface micromachining processes



[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
.  (Color online) (a) Cross section of FBAR stack with aluminum nitride layer sandwiched in between molybdenum layers. (b) SMR stack with high and low impedance layer.

.  Mason model of an FBAR. (a) Simple Mason model. (b) Improved Mason model. $C_{\rm coup}$ represents the coupling effect between electrode and substrate.

.  (Color online) Fabrication process of FBAR filters. (a) Sacrificial layer etch. (b) Sacrificial layer deposition and CMP. (c) Seed layer deposition. (d) Bottom electrode deposition and patterning. (e) Piezoelectric layer deposition, top electrode deposition and patterning. (f) Via etching. (g) Metalation of electrode. (h) Releasing of sacrificial layer.

.  (Color online) (a) Four resonators. (b) From bottom to up, FBAR stack includes seed layer, bottom electric, piezoelectric layer, top electric and passivation layer. (c) FBAR resonator. The air gap provides an acoustic impedance mismatch thus keeping most of the acoustic energy inside the sandwich.

.  S-parameter plotted on a Smith chart. (a) Simple Mason model results versus measurement results. (b) Improved Mason model results versus measurement results.

.   Comparison of these two models results with measurement result.

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 3234 Times PDF downloads: 45 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    History

    Received: 21 December 2015 Revised: Online: Published: 01 July 2016

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Xixi Han, Yi Ou, Zhigang Li, Wen Ou, Dapeng Chen, Tianchun Ye. Simulation and fabrication of thin film bulk acoustic wave resonator[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(7): 074009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074009 X X Han, Y Ou, Z G Li, W Ou, D P Chen, T C Ye. Simulation and fabrication of thin film bulk acoustic wave resonator[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(7): 074009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074009.Export: BibTex EndNote
      Citation:
      Xixi Han, Yi Ou, Zhigang Li, Wen Ou, Dapeng Chen, Tianchun Ye. Simulation and fabrication of thin film bulk acoustic wave resonator[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(7): 074009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074009

      X X Han, Y Ou, Z G Li, W Ou, D P Chen, T C Ye. Simulation and fabrication of thin film bulk acoustic wave resonator[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(7): 074009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074009.
      Export: BibTex EndNote

      Simulation and fabrication of thin film bulk acoustic wave resonator

      doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074009
      More Information
      • Corresponding author: Ou Yi, Email: ouyi@ime.ac.cn
      • Received Date: 2015-12-21
      • Accepted Date: 2016-01-27
      • Published Date: 2016-07-25

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return