Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2015, Volume 36 > Issue 12 > 123002

SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS

Properties of n-type SnO2 semiconductor prepared by spray ultrasonic technique for photovoltaic applications

H. Bendjedidi1, A. Attaf1, H. Saidi2, M. S. Aida1, S. Semmari1, A. Bouhdjar1 and Y. Benkhetta1

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: H. Bendjedidi, Email: h.bendjedidi@gmail.com

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/123002

PDF

Abstract: ${article.abstractinfo}

Key words: tin oxidethin filmsspray ultrasonicstructural propertiesoptical properties

Metal oxide semiconductors such as SnO2,In2O3,CdO and ZnO have been used in the opto-electronic devices mostly for flat panel displays,photovoltaic devices,gas sensors and heat reflecting mirrors because of their suitable band gaps of 2.8-4.2 eV,n-type conductivity and other useful characteristics[1]. Tin oxide thin films are transparent and conductive,and are particularly useful when good transparency in the visible range and good electrical conductivity are simultaneously required[2]. SnO2 films have high chemical stability and physical strength. SnO2 films can also be used in energy conversion systems. This material could find application in semiconductor electrodes for hydrogen based photo-electrochemical conversion and solar cells. SnO2 thin film can be prepared by a number of methods,such as CVD[3, 4],sputtering[5, 6],spray pyrolysis[7, 8],plasma and sol-gel methods[9],each of which had advantages and disadvantages. The preparation of SnO2 films has been well established by a spray ultrasonic technique. This technique is simple,inexpensive and permits easy deposition in the atmospheric condition. The optical and structural properties of spray deposited SnO2 films have also been well studied[10, 11],due to the greater interest of SnO2 thin films. The main accomplishment of this work is to characterize the SnO2 films (structural,optical and electrical characterisation) deposited by the spray ultrasonic process,and the film's properties dependence from the deposition conditions and the substrate temperatures. This is an important parameter for understanding the nature of thin film and its uses for required applications.

Tin oxide thin films were prepared by spraying an alcoholic solution that contains Tin Chloride dehydrate SnCl2-2H2O and CH4O onto glass substrates with deferent temperatures using ultrasonic spray process. Substrates were cleaned and degreased successively with Acetone,propanol,and distilled water. The films were deposited with a precursor molarity of 0.1 mol/L,and we have varied the temperature from 300 to 500 ℃ in atmospheric pressure. The films were characterized by means of structural,optical and electrical techniques. The film's thickness was calculated from the interference fringes obtained from transmittance spectra by the UV-VIS-NIR transmittance. The X-ray diffraction studies were carried out using a D8 ADVANCED BRUKER diffractometer with a copper anode having a wavelength λ = 1.5418Å; the crystallite sizes were estimated to study the effect of the temperature. The UV-VIS-NIR transmittance measurements were performed by using a PerkinElmer LAMBDA1050 UV/VIS/NIR spectrometer in the spectral range 300-1500 nm.

The X-ray diffraction patterns for SnO2 films deposited at 300,350,400,450 and 500 ℃ are shown in Figure2. It can be found that films deposited at 300 ℃ were nearly amorphous whereas for higher temperatures,the amorphous background was diminished and diffraction peak (110) of standard SnO2 powder revealed for all samples as mentioned by other researchers[12, 13, 14, 15]. While the films deposited at higher temperatures exhibit five peaks. It is evident that the films deposited at 350,400,450 and 500 ℃ are polycrystalline in nature. In all films the half width of the Bragg peak decreases and displays gradual change in the preferred orientation from (101) to (200) plane with an increase in the substrate temperature from 350 to 500 ℃[16].

Figure  Fig1.  SEM images of SnO2 thin films deposited on glass substrates at different temperatures.(a)300 ℃.(b)350 ℃.(c)400 ℃.(d)450 ℃.
Figure  Fig2.  {(Color online) X-ray diffraction pattern of SnO2 films at various substrate temperatures.

In order to determine the variation of the crystallite size with increasing substrate temperatures,the size of the crystallites oriented along the (101) plane is calculated using Scherrer's formula[17, 18] D=\frac{0.94\lambda }{\Delta {{\theta }_{hkl}}\cos {{\theta }_{hkl}}},

((1))

where D is the size of crystallite,Δθhkl the broadening of diffraction line measured at half its maximum intensity in radians and λ is the wavelength of X-rays (1.54 {\AA}). The calculated values of crystallite size are given in Figure3. It can be seen that the substrate's temperatures had an effective influence on the crystallite size,which increased from 21.9 to 72.2 nm. The growth in crystallite size is due to the fact by the increasing substrate's temperatures,which at higher than 300 ℃ during deposition was relatively high and enough to provide sufficient thermal energy for recrystallization. Hence,the crystallization process improved and the smaller crystallites agglomerated with increasing substrate temperature to cause a change in crystallite size distribution towards larger crystallites. This result is in agreement with those of other researchers[19, 20].

Figure  Fig3.  Dependence of the crystallite size versus substrate temperatures.

The optical transmission spectrum for SnO2 films deposited at 300,350,400,450 and 500 ℃ are shown in Figure~4,which shows the variation of transmittance with respect to the wavelength of SnO2 thin films deposited at various substrate temperatures. The average transmission in the visible region has been found to be ranging from 60% to 80% depending upon the substrate temperature. An increase in transmission is observed with an increase in temperature. At lower temperatures,at 350 ℃,a relatively lower transmission is due to the formation of milky films and that is because of incomplete decomposition of the sprayed droplets. In general,in the visible region of the spectrum,the transmission is high (high enough to observe interference fringes). It is due to the fact that the reflectivity is low and there is no (or less) absorption due to the transfer of electrons from the valence band to the conduction band owing to optical interference effects,so it is possible to maximize the transmission of thin film at a particular region of wavelengths[21].

We have used the pattern of transmission in the transparent region with successive minima and maxima to evaluate the thickness of the SnO2 films. The thickness d of the films can be calculated from the following equations[22]: N1,2=2STMTmTMTm+S2+12, n1,2=[N1,2+(N21,2S2)1/2]1/2, d=λ1λ22(n1λ2n2λ1), where d is the film's thickness,TM and Tm are maxima and minima transmittance respectively,and n,s are the film and glass refractive indices respectively.

((2))

The film's optical band gap has been determined on the basis of UV-VIS transmission measurements. The band gap (Eg) is determined by extrapolating the straight line portion of the plot to the energy axis. The intercept on the energy axis gives the value of band gap energy Eg for all the samples. The obtained optical band gap values lie in the range 3.92-3.98 eV. In Figure5 we have reported the variation of film thickness as a function of temperature. It shows that the film thickness decreases almost linearly with substrate temperature in the range 350-500 ℃,owing to the increased evaporation rate of the initial product with a rise in substrate temperature leading to the diminished mass transport towards the substrates[23]. At lower substrate temperatures 350-400 ℃,the temperature may not be sufficient to decompose the sprayed droplets of Sn2+ from the solution and this therefore,results in an increase of film thickness[24].

Figure  Fig4.  The transmittance spectra of SnO2 films at various substrate temperatures.
Figure  Fig5.  Dependence of thickness versus the substrate temperatures.

The variation of band gap Eg as a function of substrate temperature is shown in Figure6.

Figure  Fig6.  Dependence of the Band Gap versus the substrate temperatures.

The obtained energy gap values are in good agreement with other literature reports[25, 26]. It is found that the band gap energy decreases with increasing substrate temperature in the range 300-350 ℃. The values of band gap lie in the range of 3.92-3.98 eV taking into account the experimental errors; these values of band gap indicate that the SnO2 films had a direct band gap energy[27]. This result can be attributed to the decrease of grain boundaries as scattering centers. In fact,the increase of substrate temperature improves the crystallinity and increases the average crystallite size,which results in decreasing grain boundaries; therefore,the band gap energy decreases. At high temperatures in the range 350-500 ℃,the increment of band gap energy with substrate temperature may be attributed to the partial filling of the conduction band of tin oxide,resulting in a blocking of the lowest states. This widening of the optical band gap is termed as a Burstein-Moss shift[28]. This shift is given by the relation: {E_{\text{g}}} = {E_{{\text{g0}}}} + \Delta E_{\text{g}}^{{\text{BM}}}, where Eg0 is the intrinsic band gap and ΔEBMg is the Burstein-Moss shift. This shift is related to the carrier density as: \Delta E_{\text{g}}^{{\text{BM}}} = \frac{{{\pi ^2}{h^2}}}{{2{m^ * }}}{\left( {\frac{{3N}}{\pi }} \right)^{\frac{2}{3}}}, where m is the reduced effective mass,h is the Plank's constant and N is the carrier concentration.

((5))

Electrical resistivity measurements have been carried out using the two-probe method. The variation of electrical resistivity of the SnO2 films as a function of temperature is shown in Figure7. It is observed that the resistivity of the films in the first decreases slowly with temperature in the range of 350-400~℃ and rapidly between 400 and 450 ℃. In fact,two competing processes of thermal excitation of electrons and oxygen adsorption occur simultaneously. The gradual reduction in film resistivity in the temperature range 350-400 ℃ is because the thermal excitation of electrons dominates over the oxygen adsorption process,while the sharp decrease in the film resistivity with temperature in the range 400-450 ℃ may be the result of improved adsorption of atmospheric oxygen at this range of temperatures. In fact this may be attributed to the adsorption of atmospheric oxygen on the film surface. In temperatures up to 450 ℃,the resistivity increases rapidly; it could be due to the grain boundaries effect that plays the role of traps for the electrons and consequently the film resistivity is increased. The variation of the resistivity can be also explained by the effect of films thickness. As reported in Figure5,the variation of the latter is opposite to the resistivity.

Figure  Fig7.  Resistivity as a function of substrate temperature

Highly transparent films of Tin oxide have been prepared by an ultrasonic spray CVD process. Films deposited at a temperature higher than 350 ℃ were identified as polycrystalline tin oxide films. The increase of temperature in the range of 350-500 ℃ improves the film's crystallinity and enhanced the crystallite size. The transmission in the visible and infrared regions of deposited films was found to be weakly affected by the temperature deposition between 300 and 500 ℃,in which range the film's transmittance exceeds 80%. The optical band gap values ranges between 3.92-3.98 eV for films deposited at different temperatures. The resistivity was found in the range of 0.016 to 0.04 Ωcm. These films were suitable for low cost opto-electronic applications such as transparent conductive electrode,flat panel display and window filter in photovoltaic devices.



[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
Fig1.  SEM images of SnO2 thin films deposited on glass substrates at different temperatures.(a)300 ℃.(b)350 ℃.(c)400 ℃.(d)450 ℃.

Fig2.  {(Color online) X-ray diffraction pattern of SnO2 films at various substrate temperatures.

Fig3.  Dependence of the crystallite size versus substrate temperatures.

Fig4.  The transmittance spectra of SnO2 films at various substrate temperatures.

Fig5.  Dependence of thickness versus the substrate temperatures.

Fig6.  Dependence of the Band Gap versus the substrate temperatures.

Fig7.  Resistivity as a function of substrate temperature

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
1

Substrate temperature dependent studies on properties of chemical spray pyrolysis deposited CdS thin films for solar cell applications

Kiran Diwate, Amit Pawbake, Sachin Rondiya, Rupali Kulkarni, Ravi Waykar, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(2): 023001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/2/023001

2

SnS thin films deposited by chemical bath deposition, dip coating and SILAR techniques

Sunil H. Chaki, Mahesh D. Chaudhary, M. P. Deshpande

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(5): 053001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/5/053001

3

Structural and opto-electrical properties of pyrolized ZnO-CdO crystalline thin films

A. M. M. Tanveer Karim, M. K. R. Khan, M. Mozibur Rahman

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(5): 053001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/5/053001

4

Effect of Co doping on structural, optical, electrical and thermal properties of nanostructured ZnO thin films

Sonet Kumar Saha, M. Azizar Rahman, M. R. H. Sarkar, M. Shahjahan, M. K. R. Khan, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(3): 033004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/3/033004

5

Structural, optical and electrical properties of zinc oxide thin films deposited by a spray pyrolysis technique

Yacine Aoun, Boubaker Benhaoua, Brahim Gasmi, Said Benramache

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(1): 013002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/1/013002

6

Synthesis of In2S3 thin films by spray pyrolysis from precursors with different[S]/[In] ratios

Thierno Sall, A. Nafidi, Bernabé Marí Soucase, Miguel Mollar, Bouchaib Hartitti, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(6): 063002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/6/063002

7

The effect of solution concentration on the physical and electrochemical properties of vanadium oxide films deposited by spray pyrolysis

M. Mousavi, A. Kompany, N. Shahtahmasebi, M.M. Bagheri-Mohagheghi

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(10): 103001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/10/103001

8

Influence of growth time on crystalline structure, conductivity and optical properties of ZnO thin films

Said Benramache, Foued Chabane, Boubaker Benhaoua, Fatima Z. Lemmadi

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(2): 023001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/2/023001

9

Parameters influencing the optical properties of SnS thin films

Priyal Jain, P. Arun

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(9): 093004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/9/093004

10

Correlation between electrical conductivity-optical band gap energy and precursor molarities ultrasonic spray deposition of ZnO thin films

Said Benramache, Okba Belahssen, Abderrazak Guettaf, Ali Arif

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(11): 113001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/11/113001

11

First-principles study of the electronic structures and optical properties of C–F–Be doped wurtzite ZnO

Zuo Chunying, Wen Jing, Zhong Cheng

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(7): 072001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/7/072001

12

Effect of rhenium doping on various physical properties of single crystals of MoSe2

Mihir M. Vora, Aditya M. Vora

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(1): 012001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/1/012001

13

Effect of deposition conditions on the physical properties of SnxSy thin films prepared by the spray pyrolysis technique

M. R. Fadavieslam, N. Shahtahmasebi, M. Rezaee-Roknabadi, M. M. Bagheri-Mohagheghi

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(11): 113002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/11/113002

14

Structural and optoelectronic properties of sprayed Sb:SnO2 thin films: Effects of substrate temperature and nozzle-to-substrate distance

A. R. Babar, S. S. Shinde, A. V. Moholkar, C. H. Bhosale, K. Y. Rajpure, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(10): 102001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/10/102001

15

Physical properties of spray deposited CdTe thin films: PEC performance

V. M. Nikale, S. S. Shinde, C. H. Bhosale, K.Y. Rajpure

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(3): 033001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/3/033001

16

Physical properties of sprayed antimony doped tin oxide thin films: Role of thickness

A. R. Babar, S. S. Shinde, A.V. Moholkar, C. H. Bhosale, J. H. Kim, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(5): 053001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/5/053001

17

Optical and structural properties of sol–gel derived nanostructured CeO2 film

Anees A. Ansari

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(5): 053001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/5/053001

18

Structural and Optical Properties of CdTe Thin Films on Glass Grown by Hot Wall Vacuum Deposition

Yao Zhaohui, Chen Tingjin, Xia Chaofeng, Yuan Hairong, Liu Zuming, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(7): 1236-1240.

19

Growth and Optical Properties of ZnO Films and Quantum Wells

Zhang Baoping, Kang Junyong, Yu Jinzhong, Wang Qiming, Segawa Yusaburo, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(4): 613-622.

20

Effect of Surface-Covered Annealing on the Optical Properties of ZnO Films Grown by MOCVD

Wang Li, Pu Yong, Fang Wenqing, Mo Chunlan, Xiong Chuanbing, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2003, 24(3): 409-412.

1. Wei, Y.-C., Chang, H.-E., Subramaniyan, P. et al. Photocatalytic Papers Comprising Au@SnO2 Nanocrystals Immobilized on Cellulose Nanofibers for Sustainable Dye Degradation. ACS Materials Au, 2025, 5(2): 320-330. doi:10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00130
2. Bakshi, S., Rani, S. The influence of Mg and Cu doping on SnO2 thin films for assessment of transparent conducting oxide. Inorganic Chemistry Communications, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.inoche.2024.113888
3. Movahedian, Z., Tavakoli-Anbaran, H. Experimental and theoretical study of 90Sr/90Y-n-Si/ZnO betavoltaic battery and theoretical prediction of homojunction betavoltaic cells performance. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2024.109059
4. Chala, S., Saidi, H., Derbali, A. et al. Study of Al dopant effect on the physical properties and the photoluminescence of spin coated anatase TiO2:Al3+ thin films. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, 2025. doi:10.1007/s10971-025-06746-0
5. Akirtin, A., Pat, S., Korkmaz, Ş. Optical and electric properties of tin oxide (SnO2) with reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite thin films. Optical Materials, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.optmat.2024.116203
6. Hachimi, M.A., Tarbi, A., El-Mrabet, M. et al. Recent advances in the structural, morphological, linear, and non-linear optical characteristics of SnO2 thin films deposited by SPT. Journal of Materials Science, 2024, 59(32): 15017-15047. doi:10.1007/s10853-024-10073-0
7. Charrada, G., Ajili, M., Jebbari, N. et al. Investigation on physical properties of CuO and SnO2: F mixed oxide sprayed thin films for photocatalytic application: coupling effect between oxides. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2024, 35(10): 685. doi:10.1007/s10854-024-12453-3
8. Shou, C., Yang, T., Yang, T. et al. Phase Transition and Bandgap Engineering of MgSnO Thin Films for Solar-Blind Ultraviolet Photodetector Applications. ACS Applied Electronic Materials, 2024, 6(3): 1912-1920. doi:10.1021/acsaelm.3c01804
9. Ko, H., Rhee, S.W. Light-reflective properties of spherical TiO2 particles coated with (3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane, chitosan, SiO2, and SnO2. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2023, 40(5): 1228-1233. doi:10.1007/s11814-022-1336-4
10. Sen, A., Putra, M.H., Biswas, A.K. et al. Insight on the choice of sensitizers/dyes for dye sensitized solar cells: A review. Dyes and Pigments, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.dyepig.2023.111087
11. Amutha, T., Rameshbabu, M., Razia, M. et al. Structural, optical and antibacterial activity of pure and co-doped (Fe & Ni) tin oxide nanoparticles. Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2022.121996
12. Al-Rasheedi, A., Ansari, A.R., Abdeldaim, A.M. et al. Growth of zinc oxide thin films using different precursor solutions by spray pyrolysis technique. European Physical Journal Plus, 2022, 137(12): 1371. doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03599-2
13. Ganesh, K.S., Fan, L., Wang, B. et al. Built-in Electric Field for Efficient Charge Separation and Ionic Transport in LiCoO2/SnO2Semiconductor Junction Fuel Cells. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2022, 5(10): 12513-12522. doi:10.1021/acsaem.2c02152
14. Ben khetta, O., Attaf, A., Derbali, A. et al. Precursor concentration effect on the physical properties of transparent titania (Anatase-TiO2) thin films grown by ultrasonic spray process for optoelectronics application. Optical Materials, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112790
15. Derrar, K., Zaabat, M., Rouabah, N. et al. Preparation of Sb:SnO2 thin films and its effect on opto-electrical properties. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2022, 33(13): 10142-10153. doi:10.1007/s10854-022-08004-3
16. Zeribi, F., Attaf, A., Derbali, A. et al. Dependence of the Physical Properties of Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Thin Films Grown by Sol-Gel (Spin-Coating) Process on Thickness. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2022, 11(2): 023003. doi:10.1149/2162-8777/ac5168
17. Attaf, A., Djadai, A., Derbali, A. et al. The effect of ultrasonic wave amplitude on the physical properties of zinc oxide (ZnO) deposited by ultrasonic spray method. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.mseb.2021.115525
18. Ali, Z.I., Radwan, S.I., Shehata, M.M. et al. Structural, optical and electrical properties of PVC/Au thin films prepared by sputtering process. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 2021, 53(5): 241. doi:10.1007/s11082-021-02876-1
19. Baqer, A.R., Beddai, A.A., Farhan, M.M. et al. Efficient coating of titanium composite electrodes with various metal oxides for electrochemical removal of ammonia. Results in Engineering, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100199
20. Kaewsuwan, D., Wongpinit, T., Euaruksakul, C. et al. STUDY ON THE MOLECULAR BEAM EPITAXIAL GROWTH OF SnO2 ON Si (001) SUBSTRATE. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 2021, 28(6): 030072.
21. Nouadji, R., Attaf, A., Derbali, A. et al. Film thickness effect on structural, optical and electrical properties of indium oxide (In2O3) thin films grown via sol-gel method. Main Group Chemistry, 2021, 20(4): 513-527. doi:10.3233/MGC-210063
22. Yadav, S., Kumari, S., Bala, R. et al. Characterization of Sn doped vanadium oxide thin films for nonlinear optical applications. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.712
23. Benamra, H., Saidi, H., Attaf, A. et al. Physical properties of Al-doped ZnS thin films prepared by ultrasonic spray technique. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100645
24. Attaf, A., Derbali, A., Saidi, H. et al. Physical properties of Pb doped ZnS thin films prepared by ultrasonic spray technique. Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, 2020, 384(26): 126199. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2019.126199
25. Muazzam, U.U., Raghavan, M.S., Pratiyush, A.S. et al. High-responsivity (In0.26Ga0.74)2O3 UV detectors on sapphire realized by microwave irradiation-assisted deposition. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154337
26. Bhattacharya, A., Sultana, J., Sikdar, S. et al. Investigating the impact of thermal annealing on the photovoltaic performance of chemical bath deposited SnO2/p-Si heterojunction solar cells. Microsystem Technologies, 2020, 26(4): 1351-1358. doi:10.1007/s00542-019-04667-x
27. Abdallah, B., Kakhia, M., Zetoune, W. et al. Synthesizing of ZnS and ZnO nanotubes films deposited by thermal evaporation: Morphological, structural and optical properties. Materials Research Express, 2019, 6(11): 115079. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ab4c14
28. Erken, O., Ozkendir, O.M., Gunes, M. et al. A study of the electronic and physical properties of SnO2 thin films as a function of substrate temperature. Ceramics International, 2019, 45(15): 19086-19092. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.153
29. Khelifi, C., Attaf, A., saidi, H. et al. Investigation of F doped SnO 2 thin films properties deposited via ultrasonic spray technique for several applications. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2019.04.001
30. Abdallah, B., Kakhia, M., Alkafri, N. Investigation of zns nanotubes films: Morphological, structural and optical properties. Journal of Nano Research, 2019. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/JNanoR.60.142
31. Ling, J., Pal, B., Chong, K. et al. Photocurrents in crystal-amorphous hybrid stannous oxide/alumina binary nanofibers. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2019, 102(10): 6337-6348. doi:10.1111/jace.16504
32. Zor, S., Ilmieva, N. Corrosion behavior of PANI/Epoxy/nano SnO2 polymeric nanocomposite coated stainless steel in 3.5 wt% NaCl. Polymer Composites, 2018. doi:10.1002/pc.24729
33. Hashim, H., El-Hiti, G.A., Alotaibi, M.H. et al. Fabrication of ordered honeycomb porous poly(vinyl chloride) thin film doped with a Schiff base and nickel(II) chloride. Heliyon, 2018, 4(8): e00743. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00743
34. Abdallah, B., Jazmati, A.K., Kakhia, M. Physical, optical and sensing properties of sprayed zinc doped tin oxide films. Optik, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.01.008
35. Prasannakumari, K., Thomas, B. Synthesis of nano-structured tin oxide thin films with faster response to LPG and ammonia by spray pyrolysis. Materials Research Express, 2018, 5(1): 014007. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/aaa35c
36. Nunes, D., Pimentel, A., Santos, L. et al. Metal oxide nanostructures: Synthesis, properties and applications. Metal Oxide Nanostructures: Synthesis, Properties and Applications, 2018. doi:10.1016/C2016-0-01647-9
37. Derbali, A., Saidi, H., Attaf, A. et al. Solution flow rate influence on ZnS thin films properties grown by ultrasonic spray for optoelectronic application. Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(9): 093001. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/093001
38. Prasannakumari, K., Thomas, B. Synthesis of nano-structured tin oxide thin films with faster response to LPG and ammonia by spray pyrolysis. Materials Research Express, 2018, 5(1): 014007. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/aaa35
39. Sharma, V.. An insight into the structural, electrical and optical properties of SnO2 nanoparticles. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, 2017, 84(2): 231-238. doi:10.1007/s10971-017-4507-8
40. Bae, S.-D., Kwon, S.-H., Jeong, H.-S. et al. Demonstration of high-performance p-type tin oxide thin-film transistors using argon-plasma surface treatments. Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2017, 32(7): 075006. doi:10.1088/1361-6641/aa72b8
41. Dahnoun, M., Attaf, A., Saidi, H. et al. Structural, optical and electrical properties of zinc oxide thin films deposited by sol-gel spin coating technique. Optik, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.01.014
42. Khelifi, C., Attaf, A., Saidi, H. et al. Effect of solution flow on the properties of tin dioxide SnO2 thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis technique. Optik, 2016, 127(23): 11055-11062. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.09.060
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    H. Bendjedidi, A. Attaf, H. Saidi, M. S. Aida, S. Semmari, A. Bouhdjar, Y. Benkhetta. Properties of n-type SnO2 semiconductor prepared by spray ultrasonic technique for photovoltaic applications[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(12): 123002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/123002
    H. Bendjedidi, A. Attaf, H. Saidi, M. S. Aida, S. Semmari, A. Bouhdjar, Y. Benkhetta. Properties of n-type SnO2 semiconductor prepared by spray ultrasonic technique for photovoltaic applications[J]. J. Semicond., 2015, 36(12): 123002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/123002.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 3427 Times PDF downloads: 26 Times Cited by: 42 Times

    History

    Received: 19 April 2014 Revised: Online: Published: 01 December 2015

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      H. Bendjedidi, A. Attaf, H. Saidi, M. S. Aida, S. Semmari, A. Bouhdjar, Y. Benkhetta. Properties of n-type SnO2 semiconductor prepared by spray ultrasonic technique for photovoltaic applications[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(12): 123002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/123002 ****H. Bendjedidi, A. Attaf, H. Saidi, M. S. Aida, S. Semmari, A. Bouhdjar, Y. Benkhetta. Properties of n-type SnO2 semiconductor prepared by spray ultrasonic technique for photovoltaic applications[J]. J. Semicond., 2015, 36(12): 123002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/123002.
      Citation:
      H. Bendjedidi, A. Attaf, H. Saidi, M. S. Aida, S. Semmari, A. Bouhdjar, Y. Benkhetta. Properties of n-type SnO2 semiconductor prepared by spray ultrasonic technique for photovoltaic applications[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(12): 123002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/123002 ****
      H. Bendjedidi, A. Attaf, H. Saidi, M. S. Aida, S. Semmari, A. Bouhdjar, Y. Benkhetta. Properties of n-type SnO2 semiconductor prepared by spray ultrasonic technique for photovoltaic applications[J]. J. Semicond., 2015, 36(12): 123002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/123002.

      Properties of n-type SnO2 semiconductor prepared by spray ultrasonic technique for photovoltaic applications

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/123002
      More Information
      • Corresponding author: Email: h.bendjedidi@gmail.com
      • Received Date: 2014-04-19
      • Accepted Date: 2014-07-07
      • Published Date: 2015-01-25

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return