Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2016, Volume 37 > Issue 8 > 083003

SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS

High haze textured surface B-doped ZnO-TCO films on wet-chemically etched glass substrates for thin film solar cells

Xinliang Chen1, 2, 3, , Jieming Liu1, 2, 3, Jia Fang1, 2, 3, Ze Chen1, 2, 3, Ying Zhao1, 2, 3 and Xiaodan Zhang1, 2, 3

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Chen Xinliang, Email: cxlruzhou@163.com

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/8/083003

PDF

Abstract: Textured glass substrates with crater-like feature sizes of 5-30μm were obtained using the chemical etching method through adjusting the treatment round (R). Pyramid-like boron-doped zinc oxide (ZnO:B) films with feature sizes of 300-800 nm were deposited on the etched glass substrates by the metal organic chemical deposition (MOCVD) technique using water, diethylzinc and 1%-hydrogen-diluted diborane. The ZnO:B films on the etched glass with micro/nano double textures presented a much stronger light-scattering capability than the conventional ZnO:B on the flat glass and their electrical properties changed little. Typical etched glass-3R/ZnO:B exhibited a high root mean square (RMS) roughness of 160 nm. The haze values at the wavelengths of 550 nm and 850 nm for etched glass-3R/ZnO:B sample were 61% and 42%, respectively. Finally, the optimized etched glass/ZnO:B was applied in the silicon (Si) based thin film solar cells. The high haze etched glass/ZnO:B substrates have potential merits for thin film solar cells.

Key words: semiconductorssurfacesthin filmscrystal growthoptical properties

Thin-film silicon solar cells such as hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H), hydrogenated amorphous silicon germanium (a-SiGe:H) and hydrogenated microcrystalline silicon (μc-Si:H) solar cells have attracted considerable interest[1-3]. In 2013, a high initial efficiency of 16.1% for the triple-junction a-Si:H/a-SiGe:H/μc-Si:H tandem solar cell was obtained by LG Electronics[3]. Light-trapping managements, including textured front transparent conductive oxides (TCO), textured highly reflective back reflectors and/or highly reflective intermediate layers, play an important role on enhancing the short-circuit current density ( Jsc ) as well as conversion efficiency of thin film solar cells[4-7]. ZnO thin films have been extensively developed by researchers around the world[8-14]. It has been reported that textured surface zinc oxide (ZnO) TCO films applied as front electrodes exhibited good transparency, low resistivity, and excellent light scattering properties[12-14]. To further enhance the light-trapping effect of ZnO-TCO films, the haze values for evaluating optical scattering should be increased in the wide spectrum region. Many research results indicated that the haze values of glass/ZnO-TCO are strongly influenced by their surface morphology. Several methods have been attempted to modulate the surface morphology through controlling the feature size or grains size, grains shape of ZnO films and the surface feature of plasma-etched glass substrates[13, 15-18]. Multiscale transparent electrode architecture for efficient light management was also proposed by the IMT research group[18], which combined the versatility of nanoimprint lithography, high carrier mobility of hydrogenated indium oxide, and light scattering properties of self-textured boron-doped ZnO (ZnO:B). Recently, M Konagai's research group developed "W-textured" and mountain-chain-like ZnO:B films on plasma-etched glass substrates with a relatively higher haze value[19-21], which presented great potential in solar cells application.

Magnetron sputtering and metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) are the two main growth methods to obtain rough textured surface ZnO-TCO films, which typically exhibit crater-like surface and pyramid-like surface[12, 13, 22, 23]. For MOCVD, it shows many great advantages due to its low cost, low deposition temperature, and the fact that it can be applicable to a large deposition. From 2006, Oerlikon Solar used low pressure MOCVD to fabricate large-area textured surface ZnO:B layers for application in Si-based thin film solar cells.

In the present work, we combined the micro-texture glass with high haze through the low cost frosting and nano-texture ZnO:B films so as to obtain high performance TCO glass substrates for thin film solar cells. To the best of our knowledge, the development of textured MOCVD grown ZnO:B films on low-cost wet chemically etched glass (i.e. the frosting etching technique) for thin film solar cells is firstly presented in this paper. The optimized high haze etched glass/ZnO:B was preliminarily applied in a-Si:H thin film solar cells.

Textured surface superwhite glass substrates were obtained using wet-chemical etching methods. The super-white glass substrates were treated by the frosting etching technique with frosting powder (Tang's Glass Consumptive Material Company) which contains fluoride. Mixing frosting powder and HCl generates HF, which reacts with the glass and produces soluble ionic salts such as NaF and slightly soluble compounds (Na2SiF6, Ca2SiF6, BaSiF6 etc.), as well as insoluble residues (CaF2 etc.). These slightly soluble compounds and insoluble residues cover parts of the glass surface, thus providing localized protection from etching. The glass surface therefore exhibits a“U-shaped”micro-texture. The treatment round (R) for glass substrate etching was varied from 0 to 8 R Pyramid-like ZnO:B films were deposited by the MOCVD technique on the flat glass and chemically etched glass substrates, i.e. flat glass/ZnO:B, etched glass-3R/ZnO:B, etched glass-6 R/ZnO:B, and etched glass-8 R/ZnO:B. In the MOCVD-ZnO:B process, high purity diethylzinc (DEZn) and water (H2O) were used as resource materials, and diborane (B2H6) was used as an n-type dopant gas[22]. MOCVD also presents good reproducibility due to premise separate gas flow control and stable thin film growth process and thus it can produce high quality ZnO thin films with a large area of above one square meter. Gradual doping growth (GDG) was adopted so as to obtain relatively larger grains while maintaining an appropriate sheet resistance[24]. The deposition temperature was set at about 150℃. We have measured all the MOCVD-grown ZnO:B films on flat glass and chemically etched glass substrates and each thickness of ZnO:B film was about 2140 nm. The crater-like feature size of chemically etched glasses ranged from 5 to 20μm while the grain size of MOCVD-ZnO:B film was about 300-800 nm and thus in this case the thickness of thin films cannot be influenced. The MOCVD technique has the advantages of good uniformity and coverage. Pin type a-Si:H single-junction solar cells with an area of 0.25 cm2 were fabricated by a cluster plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) system on flat glass/ZnO:B and etched glass/ZnO:B substrates. The structure of solar cells was glass/textured ZnO:B/p-a-SiO:H/buffer/i-a-Si:H/n-a-Si:H/ZnO:B/Ag/Al. The i-a-Si:H layer thickness was about 300 nm.

The thicknesses were evaluated with a step profilometer (Kosaka Lab-ET200). The surface morphology was measured via atomic force microscopy (AFM, Seiko SPA 400) operated in contact mode and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Zeiss Supra-550p) using an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. Root-mean-square roughness (RMS) of layers was quantified from the AFM with a scanning area of 20×20μm2. Carrier concentrations, sheet resistances and electron mobilities were characterized by Hall measurement (Accent HL5500 PC) using the van der Pauw configuration. The haze values of glass/ZnO:B samples were defined as the ratio of diffuse transmittance (DT) to total transmittance (TT) measured with a UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer (Varian, Cary 5000). The solar cell performances, including open voltage ( Voc ), short-circuit current density ( Jsc ), fill factor (FF) and conversion efficiency (Eff.), were measured by current-density versus voltage (J-V) characteristics under an AM1.5 solar simulator at 298 K (Wacom Solar simulator-WXS-156S-L2) and quantum efficiency (QE) in the wavelength range from 300 nm to 800 nm.

Figure 1 shows typical SEM images of chemically etched superwhite glasses with different treatment rounds. From Figure 1, it was found that the surface morphology of un-treated glass was very smooth and the chemically etched glasses presented a large crater-like structure. With increasing the treatment round from 3 R to 6 R, the crater-like feature size increased from 5-10 to 10-20μm. In this case, the etched glass presented a homogeneous geometric structure in the surface. With further increasing the treatment round to 8 R, the etched glass with a crater-like structure became nonuniform, exhibiting a wide feature size distribution which ranged from about 5 to 20μm, and the surface presented more shallow craters. The RMS roughness of the chemically etched superwhite glass with 3-R treatment (i.e. etched glass-3 R) was 202 nm. For the plasma-etched glass, with an increase in the power densities and pressure, the surface of glass changed from irregular small craters to relatively large craters with a lateral feature size from 200 to 6000 nm[20]. From the above experimental results, one can see that the surface texture of glasses can be easily adjusted by chemical etching methods and the rough surfaces would increase the light-scattering. Compared with plasma etching, wet chemical etching has the advantages of low cost and easy processing for mass production. The surface of plasma etched glass is rather sharper[19] than that of wet chemically etched glass, which shows a smooth crater-like structure.

Figure  1.  Typical SEM images of chemically etched superwhite glasses with different treatment rounds: (a) 0 (flat glass), (b) 3 R, (c) 6 R and (d) 8 R.

Figures 2(a)-2(h) exhibit typical SEM images of ZnO:B films on chemically etched superwhite glasses with different treatment rounds. From Figures 2(a), 2(c), 2(e) and 2(g), it can be clearly observed that the surface morphology of glass/ZnO:B changed significantly from conventional pyramid-like single texture on flat glass to micro/nano double texture with a mixture of pyramid-like grains from ZnO:B and a large crater-like feature from chemically etched glass. Pyramid-like grains from ZnO:B can be clearly observed in the enlarged images from Figures 2(b), 2(d), 2(f) and 2(h) and the surface morphology of ZnO:B films changed little. The pyramid-like feature size of ZnO:B films was about 300-800 nm. Therefore, the crater-like feature from glass and pyramid-like grains from ZnO:B films was preserved in the etched glass/ZnO:B samples. Figures 3(a)-3(c) show typical AFM images of flat glass/ZnO:B and etched glass/ZnO:B samples. The RMS roughness increased evidently from 66 nm of flat glass/ZnO:B to 160 nm of etched glass/ZnO:B, and nearly three times improvement was achieved. More efficient light scattering at the TCO and p-Si-layer interface can be expected when the etched glass/ZnO:B with high RMS roughness and large feature size is applied to thin-film solar cells. On the one hand, ZnO-TCO front contacts may act as an efficient antireflection coating due to the refractive index grading at the ZnO:B/Si interface[4]. On the other hand, rough surface increases multi-directional spreading of scattered light in the solar cell and thus the optical paths, leading to higher absorption[25].

Figure  2.  Typical SEM images of ZnO:B films on chemically etched superwhite glasses with different treatment rounds: (a) and (b) for flat glass/ZnO:B, (c) and (d) for etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B, (e) and (f) for etched glass-6 R/ZnO:B, (g) and (h) etched glass-8 R/ZnO:B. Note that (b), (d), (f) and (h) are the corresponding enlarged images.
Figure  3.  (Color online) Typical AFM images of ZnO:B fims. (a) Flat glass/ZnO:B, RMS roughness: 66 nm. (b) Etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B, RMS roughness: 160 nm. (c) Etched glass-8 R/ZnO:B, RMS roughness: 98 nm.

Table 1 gives electrical properties of ZnO:B films on chemically etched superwhite glasses with different treatment rounds. From Table 1, it was observed that the electrical properties of ZnO:B films changed little with increasing the glass treatment round. The sheet resistance, resistivity, carrier concentration, and electron mobility of ZnO:B films were approximately 17.1-19.2 Ω , 3.7-4.1×10-3 Ω cm, 3.4-3.6×1019 cm-3, and 42.7-46.8 cm2/(V s), respectively. The electron mean-free path, in the range of a few nanometers, is much smaller than the typical grain size. Grain boundary scattering will not influence the optical mobility μoptic and only intragrain ionized impurity scattering will influence it. Note that in the case of the Hall effect measurement, electrons cross several grain boundaries, and the grain boundary density will influence the Hall mobility μHall . In lightly doped ZnO:B films (like n 3.8×1019), the observed differences between optical and Hall mobility values as a function of grain size are due to a grain barrier limited mobility[26]. For our measured ZnO:B samples with n (3.4-3.6)×1019, it was suggested that the grain boundary scattering effects are the predominant mechanism in the ZnO:B films. Additionally, when the treatment round (R) for glass substrate was varied from 0 R to 8 R, the electron mobility of ZnO:B films was slightly decreased, which leads to relatively higher resistivity and sheet resistances. Slightly higher sheet resistances may increase the series resistance of solar cells and thus influence the fill factor FF. However, double-junction and multi-junction Si-based thin film solar cells present relatively lower short-circuit current density Jsc ( 9-11 mA/cm2)[27], which will reduce the requirement of electrical performances of TCO layers. From the above results, one can see that the glass-substrate treatment using the chemical etching method allows the modification of the surface properties of glass/ZnO:B while maintaining their good electrical properties.

Table  1.  Electrical properties of ZnO:B fims on chemically etched superwhite glasses with different treatment rounds.
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

Figure 4 shows typical haze value curves of ZnO:B films on chemically etched superwhite glasses with different treatment rounds. One can see that the etched glass/ZnO:B samples presented higher haze values than the flat glass/ZnO:B in the wavelength range of 400-1800 nm. Rough etched glass/ZnO:B samples increased the optical path through multiple refractions and reflections in the interface between glass and ZnO:B film and the craters region. With increasing the treatment round, the haze values of etched glass/ZnO:B decreased, especially in the long-wavelength region. The double micro/nano textures are helpful to improve the light-scattering in the short-wavelength and long-wavelength ranges. The haze values at 550 and 850 nm wavelength of the etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B were 61% and 42%, respectively. The above results revealed that the glass-etching round is a key parameter to control the light-scattering properties of the etched glass/ZnO:B samples.

Figure  4.  Typical haze value curves of ZnO:B films on chemically etched superwhite glasses with different treatment rounds.

Flat glass/ZnO:B and etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B samples were applied in p-i-n type a-Si:H thin film solar cells. Figure 5(a) shows the I - V curves of a-Si:H thin film solar cells with the flat glass/ZnO:B and etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B substrates. For ZnO:B film deposited on the chemically etched glass, a conversion efficiency of 7.22% ( Voc : 0.841 V, Jsc : 14.79 mA/cm2 and FF: 0.581) was obtained. The efficiency was obviously higher than that of a solar cell with ZnO:B film deposited on the flat glass, 6.88% ( Voc : 0.853 V, Jsc : 13.89 mA/cm2 and FF: 0.581), which was mainly due to the improved Jsc . Figure 5(b) shows the QE curves of a-Si:H thin film solar cells with the flat glass/ZnO:B and etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B substrates. The a-Si:H thin film solar cell deposited on etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B exhibited a relatively better spectral response than the sample deposited on flat glass/ZnO:B. It is well known that the absorption coefficient of a-Si:H material is high for short wavelength light, it strongly decreases towards longer wavelengths as the light energy approaches the optical band gap of 1.75 eV. In addition, ZnO:B front electrodes mainly absorb the short wavelength light with photo energy above 3.37 eV. Therefore, the improvement of QE took place in the wavelength region of 380-750 nm and was mainly attributed to higher haze values. Current densities calculated by integrating the incident photon to current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra are 13.83 and 14.73 mA/cm2 for solar cell devices with flat glass/ZnO:B and etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B textured glass, respectively. These obtained values are almost equivalent to those measured Jsc dada in I - V curves. Furthermore, glass/ZnO:B-TCO layers should have appropriate surface roughness and morphology to achieve good light scattering and subsequent growth of Si thin films when fabricating p-i-n type Si-based thin film solar cells. Too high surface roughness will induce voids and/or cracks in the Si-based thin film solar cells and thus decrease the device performances.

Figure  5.  (a) I-V curves of a-Si:H thin film solar cells with the flat glass/ZnO:B and etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B substrates. (b) QE curves of a-Si:H thin film solar cells with the flat glass/ZnO:B and etched glass-3 R/ZnO substrates.

The super-white glasses with crater-like feature size (5-20μm) can be obtained through the chemical etching treatment method. High haze textured surface etched-glass/ZnO:B with double micro/nano textures have been successfully achieved. The etched glass/ZnO:B samples presented a much stronger light-scattering capability than the conventional flat glass/ZnO:B and they showed equivalent electrical properties with flat glass/ZnO:B. Typical etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B exhibited high RMS roughness of 160 nm. The haze values at 550 and 850 nm wavelength of etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B sample were 61% and 42% respectively. The a-Si:H solar cell with the etched glass/ZnO:B substrate presented a relatively better spectral response and thus increased the conversion efficiency.



[1]
Shah A V, Schade H, Vanecek M, et al. Thin-film silicon solar cell technology. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2004, 12: 113 doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-159X
[2]
Terakawa A. Review of thin-film silicon deposition techniques for high-efficiency solar cells developed at Panasonic/Sanyo. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2013, 119: 204 doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.06.044
[3]
Kim S, Chung J W, Lee H, et al. Remarkable progress in thin-film silicon solar cells using high-efficiency triple-junction technology. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2013, 119: 26 doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.04.016
[4]
Muller J, Rech B, Springer J, et al. TCO and light trapping in silicon thin film solar cells. Solar Energy, 2004, 77: 917 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.03.015
[5]
Chen X L, Xu B H, Xue J M, et al. Boron-doped zinc oxide thin films for large-area solar cells grown by metal organic chemical vapor deposition. Thin Solid Films, 2007, 515: 3753 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.09.039
[6]
Üpping J, Bielawny A, Wehrspohn R B, et al. Three-dimensional photonic crystal intermediate reflectors for enhanced light-trapping in tandem solar cells. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23: 3896 doi: 10.1002/adma.v23.34
[7]
Feltrin A, Meguro T, Van Assche E, et al. Advanced light trapping designs for high efficiency thin film silicon solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2013, 119: 219 doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.07.012
[8]
Mahadik M A, Hunge Y M, Shinde S S, et al. Semiconducting properties of aluminum-doped ZnO thin films grown by spray pyrolysis technique. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(3): 033002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/3/033002
[9]
Saha S K, Rahman M A, Sarkar M R H, et al. Effect of Co doping on structural, optical, electrical and thermal properties of nanostructured ZnO thin films. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(3): 033004 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/3/033004
[10]
Karim A M M T, Khan M K R, Rahman M M. Structural and opto-electrical properties of pyrolized ZnO-CdO crystalline thin films. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(5): 053001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/5/053001
[11]
Liu Yang, Ma Jianping, Liu Fuli, et al. Physical vapor transport crystal growth of ZnO. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(3): 033001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/3/033001
[12]
Fay S, Feitknecht L, Schlüchter R, et al. Rough ZnO layers by LP-CVD process and their effect in improving performances of amorphous and microcrystalline silicon solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2006, 90: 2960 doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.06.003
[13]
Berginski M, Hüpkes J, Schulte M, et al. The effect of front ZnO:Al surface texture and optical transparency on efficient light trapping in silicon thin-film solar cells. J Appl Phys 2007, 101: 074903 doi: 10.1063/1.2715554
[14]
Chen X L, Li L N, Wang F, et al. Natively textured surface aluminum-doped zinc oxide transparent conductive layers for thin film solar cells via pulsed direct-current reactive magnetron sputtering. Thin Solid Films, 2012, 520: 5392 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.03.120
[15]
Steinhauser J, Boucher J F, Omnes E, et al. Improving low pressure chemical vapor deposited zinc oxide contacts for thin film silicon solar cells by using rough glass substrates. Thin Solid Films, 2011, 520: 1218 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.080
[16]
Kim J, Battaglia C, Charriére M, et al. 9.4% efficient amorphous silicon solar cell on high aspect-ratio glass microcones. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26: 4082 doi: 10.1002/adma.v26.24
[17]
Addonizio M L, Antonaia A. Surface morphology and light scattering properties of plasma etched ZnO:B films grown by LP-MOCVD for silicon thin film solar cells. Thin Solid Films, 2009, 518: 1026 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.07.200
[18]
Boccard M, Battaglia C, Hanni S, et al. Multiscale transparent electrode architecture for efficient light management and carrier collection in solar cells. Nano Lett, 2012, 12: 1344 doi: 10.1021/nl203909u
[19]
Hongsingthong A, Krajangsang T, Yunaz I A, et al. ZnO films with very high haze value for use as front transparent conductive oxide films in thin-film silicon solar cells. Applied Physics Express, 2010, 3: 051102 doi: 10.1143/APEX.3.051102
[20]
Hongsingthong A, Krajangsang T, Limmanee A, et al. Development of textured ZnO-coated low-cost glass substrate with very high haze ratio for silicon-based thin film solar cells. Thin Solid Films, 2013, 537: 291 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.04.138
[21]
Janthong B, Moriya Y, Hongsingthong A, et al. Management of light-trapping effect for a-Si:H/μc-Si:H tandem solar cells using novel substrates, based on MOCVD ZnO and etched white glass. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2013, 119: 209 doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.06.045
[22]
Chen X L, Geng X H, Xue J M, et al. Temperature-dependent growth of zinc oxide thin films grown by metal organic chemical vapor deposition. J Cryst Growth, 2006, 296: 43 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.08.028
[23]
Tan H, Psomadaki E, Isabella O, et al. Micro-textures for efficient light trapping and improved electrical performance in thin-film nanocrystalline silicon solar cells. Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 103: 173905 doi: 10.1063/1.4826639
[24]
Chen X L, Yan C B, Chen X, et al. Textured surface ZnO:B and IWO/ZnO:B TCO layers for Si-based thin film solar cells. Proceeding of the 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference (EU-PVSEC), Hamburg, Germany, 2011: 2482 http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=69555615&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[25]
Krc J, Smole F, Topic M, Analysis of light scattering in amorphous Si:H solar cells by a one-dimensional semi-coherent optical model. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Application 2013, 11: 15 http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2069741452&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[26]
Steinhauser J, Faÿ S, Oliveira N, et al. Transition between grain boundary and intragrain scattering transport mechanisms in boron-doped zinc oxide thin films. Appl Phys Lett, 2007, 90: 142107 doi: 10.1063/1.2719158
[27]
Shah A. Thin-film silicon solar cells. Lausanne: Swiss EPFL Press, 2010
Fig. 1.  Typical SEM images of chemically etched superwhite glasses with different treatment rounds: (a) 0 (flat glass), (b) 3 R, (c) 6 R and (d) 8 R.

Fig. 2.  Typical SEM images of ZnO:B films on chemically etched superwhite glasses with different treatment rounds: (a) and (b) for flat glass/ZnO:B, (c) and (d) for etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B, (e) and (f) for etched glass-6 R/ZnO:B, (g) and (h) etched glass-8 R/ZnO:B. Note that (b), (d), (f) and (h) are the corresponding enlarged images.

Fig. 3.  (Color online) Typical AFM images of ZnO:B fims. (a) Flat glass/ZnO:B, RMS roughness: 66 nm. (b) Etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B, RMS roughness: 160 nm. (c) Etched glass-8 R/ZnO:B, RMS roughness: 98 nm.

Fig. 4.  Typical haze value curves of ZnO:B films on chemically etched superwhite glasses with different treatment rounds.

Fig. 5.  (a) I-V curves of a-Si:H thin film solar cells with the flat glass/ZnO:B and etched glass-3 R/ZnO:B substrates. (b) QE curves of a-Si:H thin film solar cells with the flat glass/ZnO:B and etched glass-3 R/ZnO substrates.

Table 1.   Electrical properties of ZnO:B fims on chemically etched superwhite glasses with different treatment rounds.

[1]
Shah A V, Schade H, Vanecek M, et al. Thin-film silicon solar cell technology. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2004, 12: 113 doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-159X
[2]
Terakawa A. Review of thin-film silicon deposition techniques for high-efficiency solar cells developed at Panasonic/Sanyo. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2013, 119: 204 doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.06.044
[3]
Kim S, Chung J W, Lee H, et al. Remarkable progress in thin-film silicon solar cells using high-efficiency triple-junction technology. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2013, 119: 26 doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.04.016
[4]
Muller J, Rech B, Springer J, et al. TCO and light trapping in silicon thin film solar cells. Solar Energy, 2004, 77: 917 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.03.015
[5]
Chen X L, Xu B H, Xue J M, et al. Boron-doped zinc oxide thin films for large-area solar cells grown by metal organic chemical vapor deposition. Thin Solid Films, 2007, 515: 3753 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.09.039
[6]
Üpping J, Bielawny A, Wehrspohn R B, et al. Three-dimensional photonic crystal intermediate reflectors for enhanced light-trapping in tandem solar cells. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23: 3896 doi: 10.1002/adma.v23.34
[7]
Feltrin A, Meguro T, Van Assche E, et al. Advanced light trapping designs for high efficiency thin film silicon solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2013, 119: 219 doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.07.012
[8]
Mahadik M A, Hunge Y M, Shinde S S, et al. Semiconducting properties of aluminum-doped ZnO thin films grown by spray pyrolysis technique. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(3): 033002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/3/033002
[9]
Saha S K, Rahman M A, Sarkar M R H, et al. Effect of Co doping on structural, optical, electrical and thermal properties of nanostructured ZnO thin films. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(3): 033004 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/3/033004
[10]
Karim A M M T, Khan M K R, Rahman M M. Structural and opto-electrical properties of pyrolized ZnO-CdO crystalline thin films. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(5): 053001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/5/053001
[11]
Liu Yang, Ma Jianping, Liu Fuli, et al. Physical vapor transport crystal growth of ZnO. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(3): 033001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/3/033001
[12]
Fay S, Feitknecht L, Schlüchter R, et al. Rough ZnO layers by LP-CVD process and their effect in improving performances of amorphous and microcrystalline silicon solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2006, 90: 2960 doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.06.003
[13]
Berginski M, Hüpkes J, Schulte M, et al. The effect of front ZnO:Al surface texture and optical transparency on efficient light trapping in silicon thin-film solar cells. J Appl Phys 2007, 101: 074903 doi: 10.1063/1.2715554
[14]
Chen X L, Li L N, Wang F, et al. Natively textured surface aluminum-doped zinc oxide transparent conductive layers for thin film solar cells via pulsed direct-current reactive magnetron sputtering. Thin Solid Films, 2012, 520: 5392 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.03.120
[15]
Steinhauser J, Boucher J F, Omnes E, et al. Improving low pressure chemical vapor deposited zinc oxide contacts for thin film silicon solar cells by using rough glass substrates. Thin Solid Films, 2011, 520: 1218 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.080
[16]
Kim J, Battaglia C, Charriére M, et al. 9.4% efficient amorphous silicon solar cell on high aspect-ratio glass microcones. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26: 4082 doi: 10.1002/adma.v26.24
[17]
Addonizio M L, Antonaia A. Surface morphology and light scattering properties of plasma etched ZnO:B films grown by LP-MOCVD for silicon thin film solar cells. Thin Solid Films, 2009, 518: 1026 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.07.200
[18]
Boccard M, Battaglia C, Hanni S, et al. Multiscale transparent electrode architecture for efficient light management and carrier collection in solar cells. Nano Lett, 2012, 12: 1344 doi: 10.1021/nl203909u
[19]
Hongsingthong A, Krajangsang T, Yunaz I A, et al. ZnO films with very high haze value for use as front transparent conductive oxide films in thin-film silicon solar cells. Applied Physics Express, 2010, 3: 051102 doi: 10.1143/APEX.3.051102
[20]
Hongsingthong A, Krajangsang T, Limmanee A, et al. Development of textured ZnO-coated low-cost glass substrate with very high haze ratio for silicon-based thin film solar cells. Thin Solid Films, 2013, 537: 291 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.04.138
[21]
Janthong B, Moriya Y, Hongsingthong A, et al. Management of light-trapping effect for a-Si:H/μc-Si:H tandem solar cells using novel substrates, based on MOCVD ZnO and etched white glass. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2013, 119: 209 doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.06.045
[22]
Chen X L, Geng X H, Xue J M, et al. Temperature-dependent growth of zinc oxide thin films grown by metal organic chemical vapor deposition. J Cryst Growth, 2006, 296: 43 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.08.028
[23]
Tan H, Psomadaki E, Isabella O, et al. Micro-textures for efficient light trapping and improved electrical performance in thin-film nanocrystalline silicon solar cells. Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 103: 173905 doi: 10.1063/1.4826639
[24]
Chen X L, Yan C B, Chen X, et al. Textured surface ZnO:B and IWO/ZnO:B TCO layers for Si-based thin film solar cells. Proceeding of the 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference (EU-PVSEC), Hamburg, Germany, 2011: 2482 http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=69555615&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[25]
Krc J, Smole F, Topic M, Analysis of light scattering in amorphous Si:H solar cells by a one-dimensional semi-coherent optical model. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Application 2013, 11: 15 http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2069741452&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[26]
Steinhauser J, Faÿ S, Oliveira N, et al. Transition between grain boundary and intragrain scattering transport mechanisms in boron-doped zinc oxide thin films. Appl Phys Lett, 2007, 90: 142107 doi: 10.1063/1.2719158
[27]
Shah A. Thin-film silicon solar cells. Lausanne: Swiss EPFL Press, 2010
1

Substrate temperature dependent studies on properties of chemical spray pyrolysis deposited CdS thin films for solar cell applications

Kiran Diwate, Amit Pawbake, Sachin Rondiya, Rupali Kulkarni, Ravi Waykar, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(2): 023001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/2/023001

2

SnS thin films deposited by chemical bath deposition, dip coating and SILAR techniques

Sunil H. Chaki, Mahesh D. Chaudhary, M. P. Deshpande

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(5): 053001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/5/053001

3

Structural and opto-electrical properties of pyrolized ZnO-CdO crystalline thin films

A. M. M. Tanveer Karim, M. K. R. Khan, M. Mozibur Rahman

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(5): 053001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/5/053001

4

Structural, optical and electrical properties of zinc oxide thin films deposited by a spray pyrolysis technique

Yacine Aoun, Boubaker Benhaoua, Brahim Gasmi, Said Benramache

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(1): 013002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/1/013002

5

Effect of Co doping on structural, optical, electrical and thermal properties of nanostructured ZnO thin films

Sonet Kumar Saha, M. Azizar Rahman, M. R. H. Sarkar, M. Shahjahan, M. K. R. Khan, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(3): 033004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/3/033004

6

Effect of band gap energy on the electrical conductivity in doped ZnO thin film

Said Benramache, Okba Belahssen, Hachemi Ben Temam

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(7): 073001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/7/073001

7

Significant improvement of ZnS film electrical and optical performance by indium incorporation

Jinhuo Chen, Wenjian Li

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(9): 093003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/9/093003

8

The effect of solution concentration on the physical and electrochemical properties of vanadium oxide films deposited by spray pyrolysis

M. Mousavi, A. Kompany, N. Shahtahmasebi, M.M. Bagheri-Mohagheghi

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(10): 103001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/10/103001

9

The effect of annealing temperature and the characteristics of p-n junction diodes based on sprayed polyaniline/ZnO thin films

R. Suresh, V. Ponnuswamy, J. Chandrasekaran, D. Manoharan, R. Mariappan, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(8): 083001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/8/083001

10

Photoconductivity and surface chemical analysis of ZnO thin films deposited by solution-processing techniques for nano and microstructure fabrication

V.K. Dwivedi, P. Srivastava, G. Vijaya Prakash

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(3): 033001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/3/033001

11

Parameters influencing the optical properties of SnS thin films

Priyal Jain, P. Arun

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(9): 093004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/9/093004

12

Correlation between electrical conductivity-optical band gap energy and precursor molarities ultrasonic spray deposition of ZnO thin films

Said Benramache, Okba Belahssen, Abderrazak Guettaf, Ali Arif

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(11): 113001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/11/113001

13

Influence of growth time on crystalline structure, conductivity and optical properties of ZnO thin films

Said Benramache, Foued Chabane, Boubaker Benhaoua, Fatima Z. Lemmadi

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(2): 023001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/2/023001

14

First-principles study of the electronic structures and optical properties of C–F–Be doped wurtzite ZnO

Zuo Chunying, Wen Jing, Zhong Cheng

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(7): 072001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/7/072001

15

Optical and electrical properties of porous silicon layer formed on the textured surface by electrochemical etching

Ou Weiying, Zhao Lei, Diao Hongwei, Zhang Jun, Wang Wenjing, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(5): 056002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/5/056002

16

Physical properties of spray deposited CdTe thin films: PEC performance

V. M. Nikale, S. S. Shinde, C. H. Bhosale, K.Y. Rajpure

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(3): 033001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/3/033001

17

Physical properties of sprayed antimony doped tin oxide thin films: Role of thickness

A. R. Babar, S. S. Shinde, A.V. Moholkar, C. H. Bhosale, J. H. Kim, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(5): 053001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/5/053001

18

Optical and electrical properties of N-doped ZnO and fabrication of thin-film transistors

Zhu Xiaming, Wu Huizhen, Wang Shuangjiang, Zhang Yingying, Cai Chunfeng, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(3): 033001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/3/033001

19

Growth and Optical Properties of ZnO Films and Quantum Wells

Zhang Baoping, Kang Junyong, Yu Jinzhong, Wang Qiming, Segawa Yusaburo, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(4): 613-622.

20

Effect of Surface-Covered Annealing on the Optical Properties of ZnO Films Grown by MOCVD

Wang Li, Pu Yong, Fang Wenqing, Mo Chunlan, Xiong Chuanbing, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2003, 24(3): 409-412.

1. Bose, S., Mandal, S., Barua, A.K. et al. Sacrificial layer assisted front textured glass substrate with improved light management in thin film silicon solar cells. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2019, 30(3): 2622-2629. doi:10.1007/s10854-018-0537-4
2. Zhang, S., Zeng, X. Influence of band gap of p-type hydrogenated nanocrystalline silicon layer on the short-circuit current density in thin-film silicon solar cells. Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(11): 114007. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/38/11/114007
3. Chen, L., Chen, X., Liu, Y. et al. Research on ZnO/Si heterojunction solar cells. Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(5): 054006. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/38/5/054005
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Xinliang Chen, Jieming Liu, Jia Fang, Ze Chen, Ying Zhao, Xiaodan Zhang. High haze textured surface B-doped ZnO-TCO films on wet-chemically etched glass substrates for thin film solar cells[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(8): 083003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/8/083003
    X L Chen, J M Liu, J Fang, Z Chen, Y Zhao, X D Zhang. High haze textured surface B-doped ZnO-TCO films on wet-chemically etched glass substrates for thin film solar cells[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(8): 083003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/8/083003.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 3055 Times PDF downloads: 22 Times Cited by: 3 Times

    History

    Received: 05 December 2015 Revised: 12 January 2016 Online: Published: 01 August 2016

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Xinliang Chen, Jieming Liu, Jia Fang, Ze Chen, Ying Zhao, Xiaodan Zhang. High haze textured surface B-doped ZnO-TCO films on wet-chemically etched glass substrates for thin film solar cells[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(8): 083003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/8/083003 ****X L Chen, J M Liu, J Fang, Z Chen, Y Zhao, X D Zhang. High haze textured surface B-doped ZnO-TCO films on wet-chemically etched glass substrates for thin film solar cells[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(8): 083003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/8/083003.
      Citation:
      Xinliang Chen, Jieming Liu, Jia Fang, Ze Chen, Ying Zhao, Xiaodan Zhang. High haze textured surface B-doped ZnO-TCO films on wet-chemically etched glass substrates for thin film solar cells[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(8): 083003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/8/083003 ****
      X L Chen, J M Liu, J Fang, Z Chen, Y Zhao, X D Zhang. High haze textured surface B-doped ZnO-TCO films on wet-chemically etched glass substrates for thin film solar cells[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(8): 083003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/8/083003.

      High haze textured surface B-doped ZnO-TCO films on wet-chemically etched glass substrates for thin film solar cells

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/8/083003
      Funds:

      the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China 2013AA050302

      Project supported by the State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China 2011CBA00706

      Project supported by the State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China (Nos. 2011CBA00706, 2011CBA00707), the Tianjin Applied Basic Research Project and Cutting-Edge Technology Research Plan (No. 13JCZDJC26900), the Tianjin Major Science and Technology Support Project (No. 11TXSYGX22100), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2013AA050302), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 65010341)

      the Tianjin Major Science and Technology Support Project 11TXSYGX22100

      the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 65010341

      the Tianjin Applied Basic Research Project and Cutting-Edge Technology Research Plan 13JCZDJC26900

      Project supported by the State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China 2011CBA00706

      More Information
      • Corresponding author: Chen Xinliang, Email: cxlruzhou@163.com
      • Received Date: 2015-12-05
      • Revised Date: 2016-01-12
      • Published Date: 2016-08-01

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return