J. Semicond. > 2019, Volume 40 > Issue 7 > 071904

REVIEWS

Electrically driven single-photon sources

Yating Lin, Yongzheng Ye and Wei Fang

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Wei Fang, Email: wfang08@zju.edu.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/7/071904

PDF

Turn off MathJax

Abstract: Single-photon sources are building blocks for photonic quantum information processes. Of the many single-photon generation schemes, electrically driven single-photon sources have the advantages of realizing monolithic integration of quantum light sources and detectors without optical filtering, thus greatly simplify the integrated quantum photonic circuits. Here, we review recent advances on electrically driven single-photon sources based on solid-state quantum emitters, such as semiconductor epitaxial quantum dots, colloidal quantum dots, carbon nanotubes, molecules, and defect states in diamond, SiC and layered semiconductors. In particular, the merits and drawbacks of each system are discussed. Finally, the article is concluded by discussing the challenges that remain for electrically driven single-photon sources.

Key words: single photon sourceselectrically drivenintegrated quantum photoncs

Silicon carbide (SiC) has proved to be one of the most promising wide band gap semiconductor materials for high power electronic devices[1, 2]. Nowadays, with the development of large wafer-size and high-quality epitaxial technology, SiC power devices have exhibited a trend of rapid development[3-6]. The 4H-SiC Schottky barrier diode (SBD) is the first commercial power device of SiC that has shown significant advantages compared with silicon (Si) fast recovery diodes (FRDs)[7, 8]. In recent years, the applications of SiC SBDs have increased and the research on 4H-SiC SBDs have made significant achievements[9-12]. Moreover, the 4H-SiC SBDs have become the most commercial devices among the SiC power devices[13, 14].

To reduce costs, the area of the 4H-SiC SBD chip has been scaled down by minimizing the resistance of the active area and narrowing down the length of the terminal[12, 15]. Besides contributions for the blocking voltage, the terminal region also contributes to the total forward current through the lateral spreading current[16]. Nevertheless, there are fewer studies about current spreading at the terminal region of the 4H-SiC SBD chips[16]. Investigation of lateral current spreading at the terminal region would be significant for decreasing the chip area of 4H-SiC SBD chips. Moreover, the results may also help reduce the costs of other SiC power devices.

In this paper, 4H-SiC SBD chips with a field limiting ring (FLR) terminal are simulated and fabricated. The lateral current spreading in the 4H-SiC SBD chip is investigated and calculated. Moreover, the effect of the lateral current spreading on the forward performance of the device is discussed and analyzed.

To investigate the lateral spreading current in the 4H-SiC SBDs, simulations are carried out using Silvaco TCAD tools. Table 1 lists the physical models and the parameters, including the bandgap energy model[17], the incomplete ionization model[18], the mobility model[19], the impact ionization model[20], and the Schottky contact model[21]. The schematics of the device structures and the parameters used in the simulation are shown in Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 1(a), the terminal region consisted of field limiting rings and scribing lines are included in the structural model to simulate the lateral spreading current. The width of the active and the terminal regions in Fig. 1(a) are W and 175 μm, respectively. A structural model without the terminal region is also constructed to extract lateral spreading current as shown in Fig. 1(b).

Table  1.  Models and parameters used in the simulation.
ModelParameter
Bandgap energy
model[17]
$ {E}_{\mathrm{g}}\left(T\right)=3.359-{\dfrac{8.2\times {10}^{-4}{T}^{2}}{T+1.8\times {10}^{3}} }$
Incomplete ionization model[18]$ {N}_{\mathrm{D}}^{+}=\dfrac{{N}_{\mathrm{D}}}{1+2\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{p}\left(\dfrac{{E}_{\mathrm{F},\mathrm{n}}-0.065}{kT}\right)} $
Mobility model[19]$ {\mu }_{\mathrm{e}}^{}=\dfrac{950-40}{1+{\left(\dfrac{{N}_{\mathrm{D}}}{1.9\times {10}^{17}}\right)}^{0.61}} $
Impact ionization model[20]$ {\alpha }_{\mathrm{n}}\left(E\right)=3.39\times {10}^{5}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{p}\left[-{\left(\dfrac{5.15\times {10}^{6}}{E}\right)}^{2.37}\right] $
Schottky contact
model[21]
$ \displaystyle{ {\Delta} {\phi }_{{\rm{B}}{\rm{n}}} \left(E\right) = 1.5 \times {10}^{-4}\left({E}^{0.5} - {{E}_{{\rm{e}}{\rm{q}}}}^{0.5}\right) + 1.5 \times {10}^{-7}\left(E - {E}_{{\rm{e}}{\rm{q}}}\right)} $
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table
Figure  1.  (Color online) Schematics of the device structures used in the simulation. (a) Considering the lateral spreading current. (b) Ignoring the lateral spreading current.

Because the terminal region is included, the forward current of the structure model shown in Fig. 1(a) contains the lateral spreading current. However, the forward current of the structure model shown in Fig. 1(b) does not contain the lateral spreading current. Therefore, proportions of lateral spreading current in the total forward current (Psp) of the devices are extracted through simulation. The values of W and the corresponding chip sizes in the simulation range from 0.325 to 3.325 mm and from 1.0 to 49 mm2, respectively. The simulated relationship between Psp and S is shown in Fig. 2. With the increase in the chip size from 1.0 to 49 mm2, Psp is decreased from 53% to 8%. The simulation results indicate that the value Psp decreases when the SBD chip becomes larger.

Figure  2.  Simulated relationship between chip size and proportion of spread current in the total forward current.

To further investigate the lateral spreading current, 4H-SiC SBD chips with the same terminal structure are fabricated on a 4-inch 4o off-axis N-type 4H-SiC epitaxial wafer bought from TYSiC Inc. The thickness of the epitaxial layer and the substrate are 7.0 and 350 μm, respectively. There is a 0.5 μm highly doped epitaxial buffer layer between the drift region and the substrate. The doping concentrations of the drift and the buffer layers are 1.0 × 1016 and 1 × 1018 cm−3, respectively. The FLRs are formed by Al implantation and followed by 1700 °C high-temperature annealing processes, where SiO2 is used as a masking film during the implantation process. A carbon film made by carbonized photoresist is used to protect the 4H-SiC during the high-temperature annealing process. After the annealing process, the carbon film is removed through sacrificial oxidation. Ni, used as the ohmic contact metal, is deposited on the bottom by evaporation equipment. After deposition, a rapid thermal process (RTP) at 1000 °C is carried out to form the ohmic contact. Then, Ni is deposited on the top through the lift-off process and the Schottky contact is formed after RTP. Ag and Al are used as the cathode and anode pads, respectively. Finally, the devices are passivated by SiO2 and polyimide (PI). The chip sizes (S) are 2.0 × 2.0 mm2 and 1.0 × 1.0 mm2. The sizes of the active areas (SA) in the two chips are 1.65 × 1.65 mm2 and 0.65 × 0.65 mm2. Fig. 3 shows the top view of the fabricated SiC SBD chip. It can be seen from the figure that after scribing, the width of the terminal region and scribing trench region is 175 μm.

Figure  3.  (Color online) Top view of the fabricated SiC SBD chip.

After the fabrication processes, the Keysight B1505A power device test system is used to test the SBD chips. The forward and the reverse current–voltage curves of the two chips are shown in Fig. 4. The turn-on voltage of the fabricated SiC SBD chip is about 0.9 V. When the anode voltage is 1.55 V, the forward current of the two SBD chips are 10.7 and 2.5 A. The values of the on-state resistance of the two chips are calculated to be about 145 and 620 mΩ. When the cathode voltage is 650 V, the reverse leakage currents of the two chips are 1.07 and 0.17 μA. Since the chip sizes are different, the forward current (IF) and the leakage current (IR) between the two SBD chips are different. The SBD with a larger chip size shows higher current values.

Figure  4.  (Color online) Current–voltage curves of the fabricated SBD chips. (a) Forward current–voltage curves. (b) Reverse current–voltage curves.

Fig. 5 shows the current density-voltage curves of the fabricated SBD chips. Although the vertical parameters and the fabrication processes are the same, both forward current densities (JF = IF/S) and reverse current densities (JR = IR/S) between the two chips are different. Figs. 5(a) and 5(c) show that the SBD with a larger chip size shows higher forward and reverse current densities. In Figs. 5(b) and 5(d) , the current densities are expressed using SA as

Figure  5.  (Color online) Current density–voltage curves of the fabricated SBD chips. (a) Forward current density–voltage curves. (b) IF/SA–voltage curves. (c) Reverse current density–voltage curves. (d) IR/SA–voltage curves.
JFA=IFSA,
(1)

and

JRA=IRSA,
(2)

respectively. The calculated forward current density (JFA) in the SBD with a smaller chip size is higher. Meanwhile, the calculated reverse current densities (JRA) in the two SBD chips are almost the same. The different results may be caused by the lateral spreading current in the terminal region. When calculating the current densities using SA, the conduction area in the terminal region is ignored. However, the contribution of the conduction area in the terminal region on the forward current is included. Therefore, the SBD with a smaller chip size shows a higher forward calculated value. Meanwhile, the reverse calculated value is almost the same as shown in Fig. 5(d). It is because the reverse leakage current is very small and there is almost no lateral spreading during the reverse biased condition. Although, the current density calculating method that uses SA is incorrect in analyzing the SiC SBD chips, the method is useful for analyzing the lateral spreading current.

Fig. 6 shows the schematic diagrams of the lateral current spreading in the 4H-SiC SBD chips. In the 4H-SiC SBD chip, the entire bottom is covered by a cathode electrode, at the same time, the anode electrode area at the top is depending on the active area. As a result, the top anode electrode and the bottom cathode electrode in the 4H-SiC SBD chip are asymmetrical. Therefore, there are potential and electron density differences at the edge of the active area in the 4H-SiC SBD at on-state. The potential and the electron density differences cause the lateral transport of electrons. The lateral transport of electrons leads to spreading current at the terminal region of the active area. Then, according to the current flowing path, the total forward current (IF) can be divided into two portions. One is the current that flows through the active area and the other is the current that flows through the spreading area under the terminal region. Therefore, the total forward current (IF) of the SBD chip can be defined as the sum of two portions:

Figure  6.  (Color online) Schematic diagrams of the lateral current spreading in the 4H-SiC SBD chip. (a) Cross-section view. (b) Vertical view.
IF=IA+Isp,
(3)

where IA and Isp are the currents that flow through the active and the terminal regions, respectively.

Since IF consists of IA and Isp, a new equation can be achieved by substituting Eq. (3) into Eq. (1)

JFA=IASA+IspSA.
(4)

If the process deviation during the fabrication is ignored, the current density that flows through the active region is a fixed value. Then, IA/SA in the two SBD chips should be the same. Subtracting JFA1 of the larger SBD chip from JFA2 of the smaller SBD chip, the result can be written as:

JFA2JFA1=Isp2SA2Isp1SA1,
(5)

where Isp1 and SA1 are the spreading current and the active area in the SBD chip with larger size, respectively. While Isp2 and SA2 are the spreading current and the active area in the SBD chip with smaller size, respectively. The values of SA1 and SA2 in this work are 0.027225 and 0.004225 cm2, respectively.

In order to further analyze the lateral spreading current in the 4H-SiC SBD chip, a new parameter needs to be defined to describe the contribution of the spreading current along the edge around the active area. Since the total spreading current Isp is a sum of the extended currents in each region along the active boundary, the linear density of the lateral spreading current along the active boundary (Jsp) is defined in the SBD chips. Thus, the total spreading current in the SBD chip can be expressed as the product of Jsp and the length of the active boundary. The length of the active boundary is scilicet the perimeter of the active area. Considering the vertical parameters, the terminal structure and the fabrication process are all the same in the two SBD chips, and Jsp in the two SBD chips can be approximately equal[22, 23]. Then Eq. (5) can be written as:

JFA2JFA1=JspCA2SA2JspCA1SA1,
(6)

where CA1 and CA2 are the perimeters of the active area in the two 4H-SiC SBD chips. The values of CA1 and CA2 in this paper are 0.66 and 0.26 cm, respectively. Then, from Eqs. (1) and (6), Jsp can be written as:

Jsp=IF2SA1IF1SA2CA2SA1CA1SA2.
(7)

Then, the value of Isp and the proportion of Isp in the total forward current (Psp) of the SBD chip can be calculated as:

Isp=JspCA,
(8)

and

Psp=JspCAIF,
(9)

respectively. According to Eqs. (8) and (9), Jsp and Psp of the fabricated SiC SBD chips at different anode voltages are calculated and shown in Fig. 7. The calculated Jsp exhibits a linear relation with the anode voltage, indicating that there is a fixed spreading resistance at the on-state in the current spreading region. Therefore, the linear specific spreading resistance in the current spreading region at the on-state can be calculated through the Jsp curve in Fig. 7. The calculated value of linear specific spreading resistance is about 8.6 Ω/cm. Even though the spreading resistance is fixed for a specific chip, the Psp is still increased with the increase in the anode voltage during the initial on-state. Once the anode voltage becomes higher, the increasing rate of Psp slows down and Psp tends to a stable value. As shown in Fig. 7, Psp in the two fabricated chips tends to be stable at the forward voltage drops of 1.5 and 1.55 V with stable values of about 54% and 32%, respectively.

Figure  7.  (Color online) Calculated Jsp and Psp at different anode voltages of the SBD chips.

For SiC SBDs with different chip sizes, the proportions of the active area in the entire chips are different. The expected active area, the terminal region and the scribing trench also occupy a certain proportion in the entire chip. The proportions of the terminal region and the scribing trench in the entire chip may be concerned with the lateral spreading current. Therefore, Ksp is defined as the proportion of the terminal region and the scribing trench in the entire chip in this work. Then Ksp can be calculated as:

Ksp=(1SAS)×100%,
(10)

where SA and S are the active and the chip areas, respectively. According to Eq. (10), Ksp for SiC SBDs with different chip sizes can be theoretically calculated assuming that these SBD chips have the same vertical parameters, the same terminal structures and the same fabrication processes. The relation curve of calculated Ksp and S for SiC SBDs with different chip sizes is shown in Fig. 8. It can be seen from the figure that when the size of the SiC SBD chip is small, the active area is small and the proportion of terminal and scribing trench is large. With the increase in the chip size, Ksp decreases. Fig. 8 shows that Ksp is lower than 20% when the chip area is larger than 0.1 cm2. The values of Psp of the simulated SBD chips and the fabricated SBD chips are also calculated and marked in Fig. 8. It is clear that not all the terminal regions and the scribing trenches are effectively contributed to the lateral spreading current. Therefore, there is a relation coefficient between Psp and Ksp. The marked Psp comparatively coincides with the Ksp curve. In the SiC SBDs with chip sizes of 2.0 × 2.0 mm2 and 1.0 × 1.0 mm2, the calculated values of Ksp are 31.94% and 57.75%, respectively. Comparing the calculated Ksp and Psp in the two chips, the values are closed in each chip. For the SBD chip with a chip size of 2.0 × 2.0 mm2, the calculated Psp is slightly higher than Ksp. Meanwhile, for the SBD chip with a chip size of 1.0 × 1.0 mm2, the calculated Psp is slightly lower than Ksp. The difference between the calculated Psp and Ksp may be caused by process deviation during the fabrication and relation coefficient between Psp and Ksp. According to KspS curve, it can be predicted that when the chip area of the fabricated SiC SBD becomes larger than 0.1 cm2, the value of Psp would be lower than 20%. When the chip area of the fabricated SiC SBD becomes larger than 0.5 cm2, the value of Psp would be lower than 10%.

Figure  8.  KspS curve and Psp of the fabricated SBD chips.

In this paper, the lateral current spreading in the 4H-SiC SBD chip is investigated through simulation and experiment. The obtained results indicate that there is a fixed spreading resistance at the on-state in the current spreading region. The linear specific spreading resistance at the on-state is calculated to be about 8.6 Ω/cm in the fabricated chips. Moreover, the proportion of the lateral spreading current in the total forward current (Psp) is related to both the anode voltage and chip area. During the initial on-state, Psp increases with the increase in the anode voltage. Then Psp tends to a stable value. The stable values of Psp of the two fabricated chips are about 32% and 54%. The calculated proportions of the terminal region and the scribing trench in the entire chip (Ksp) of the two fabricated chips are 31.94% and 57.75%, respectively, which are closed with Psp in a specific chip. The calculated Ksp can be used to predict Psp in the SiC SBD chips with different sizes. When the chip area of the fabricated SiC SBD becomes larger than 0.5 cm2, the value of Psp would be lower than 10%. The results obtained in this work can be introduced to the lateral spreading current investigations in other SiC power devices.

This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (62004161), in part by Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2020JQ-636), in part by Scientific Research Project of Education Department of Shaanxi Province (20JK0796), in part by Youth talent lift project of Xi’an Science and Technology Association (095920201318) and in part by Bidding Project of Shanxi Province (20201101017).



[1]
Nielsen M A, Chuang I L. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010
[2]
Sun Q C, Mao Y L, Chen S J, et al. Quantum teleportation with independent sources and prior entanglement distribution over a network. Nat Photon, 2016, 10(10), 671 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.179
[3]
O’brien J L. Optical quantum computing. Science, 2007, 318(5856), 1567 doi: 10.1126/science.1142892
[4]
Arcari M, Söllner I, Javadi A, et al. Near-unity coupling efficiency of a quantum emitter to a photonic crystal waveguide. Phys Rev Lett, 2014, 113(9), 093603 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.093603
[5]
Carolan J, Harrold C, Sparrow C, et al. Universal linear optics. Science, 2015, 349(6249), 711 doi: 10.1126/science.aab3642
[6]
Wang J, Paesani S, Ding Y, et al. Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics. Science, 2018, 360(6386), 285 doi: 10.1126/science.aar7053
[7]
Smith B J, Kundys D, Thomas-Peter N, et al. Phase-controlled integrated photonic quantum circuits. Opt Express, 2009, 17(16), 13516 doi: 10.1364/OE.17.013516
[8]
Takesue H, Matsuda N, Kuramochi E, et al. An on-chip coupled resonator optical waveguide single-photon buffer. Nat Commun, 2013, 4, 2725 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3725
[9]
Pernice W H, Schuck C, Minaeva O, et al. High-speed and high-efficiency travelling wave single-photon detectors embedded in nanophotonic circuits. Nat Commun, 2012, 3, 1325 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2307
[10]
Sprengers J, Gaggero A, Sahin D, et al. Waveguide superconducting single-photon detectors for integrated quantum photonic circuits. Appl Phys Lett, 2011, 99(18), 181110 doi: 10.1063/1.3657518
[11]
Senellart P, Solomon G, White A. High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. Nat Nano, 2017, 12(11), 1026 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2017.218
[12]
Yuan Z, Kardynal B E, Stevenson R M, et al. Electrically driven single-photon source. Science, 2002, 295(5552), 102 doi: 10.1126/science.1066790
[13]
Ward M, Farrow T, See P, et al. Electrically driven telecommunication wavelength single-photon source. Appl Phys Lett, 2007, 90(6), 063512 doi: 10.1063/1.2472172
[14]
Deshpande S, Heo J, Das A, et al. Electrically driven polarized single-photon emission from an InGaN quantum dot in a GaN nanowire. Nat Commun, 2013, 4, 1675 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2691
[15]
Deshpande S, Frost T, Hazari A, et al. Electrically pumped single-photon emission at room temperature from a single In- GaN/GaN quantum dot. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 105(14), 141109 doi: 10.1063/1.4897640
[16]
Nowak A, Portalupi S, Giesz V, et al. Deterministic and electrically tunable bright single-photon source. Nat Commun, 2014, 5, 3240 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4240
[17]
Heindel T, Schneider C, Lermer M, et al. Electrically driven quantum dot-micropillar single photon source with 34% overall efficiency. Appl Phys Lett, 2010, 96(1), 011107 doi: 10.1063/1.3284514
[18]
Lin X, Dai X, Pu C, et al. Electrically-driven single-photon sources based on colloidal quantum dots with near-optimal antibunching at room temperature. Nat Commun, 2017, 8(1), 1132 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01379-6
[19]
Khasminskaya S, Pyatkov F, Słowik K, et al. Fully integrated quantum photonic circuit with an electrically driven light source. Nat Photon, 2016, 10(11), 727 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.178
[20]
Zhang L, Yu Y J, Chen L G, et al. Electrically driven single-photon emission from an isolated single molecule. Nat Commun, 2017, 8(1), 580 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00681-7
[21]
Lohrmann A, Pezzagna S, Dobrinets I, et al. Diamond based light-emitting diode for visible single-photon emission at room temperature. Appl Phys Lett, 2011, 99(25), 251106 doi: 10.1063/1.3670332
[22]
Mizuochi N, Makino T, Kato H, et al. Electrically driven single-photon source at room temperature in diamond. Nat Photon, 2012, 6(5), 299 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.75
[23]
Doi Y, Makino T, Kato H, et al. Deterministic electrical charge-state initialization of single nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond. Phys Rev X, 2014, 4(1), 011057 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011057
[24]
Lohrmann A, Iwamoto N, Bodrog Z, et al. Single-photon emitting diode in silicon carbide. Nat Commun, 2015, 6, 7783 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8783
[25]
Glauber R J. The quantum theory of optical coherence. Phys Rev, 1963, 130(6), 2529 doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.130.2529
[26]
Brown R H, Twiss R Q, surName g. Interferometry of the intensity fluctuations in light-i. basic theory: the correlation between photons in coherent beams of radiation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1957, 242(1230), 300 doi: 10.1098/rspa.1957.0177
[27]
Wang H, Duan Z C, Li Y H, et al. Near-transform-limited single photons from an efficient solid-state quantum emitter. Phys Rev Lett, 2016, 116(21), 213601 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.213601
[28]
Hong C K, Ou Z Y, Mandel L. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys Rev Lett, 1987, 59(18), 2044 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2044
[29]
Imamog A, Yamamoto Y, et al. Turnstile device for heralded single photons: Coulomb blockade of electron and hole tunnel- ing in quantum confined p–i–n heterojunctions. Phys Rev Lett, 1994, 72(2), 210 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.210
[30]
Gschrey M, Gericke F, Schüßler A, et al. In situ electron-beam lithography of deterministic single-quantum-dot mesa-structures using low-temperature cathodoluminescence spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 102(25), 251113 doi: 10.1063/1.4812343
[31]
Somaschi N, Giesz V, De Santis L, et al. Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state. Nat Photonics, 2016, 10(5), 340 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.23
[32]
Reischle M, Beirne G, Schulz W M, et al. Electrically pumped single-photon emission in the visible spectral range up to 80 K. Opt Express, 2008, 16(17), 12771 doi: 10.1364/OE.16.012771
[33]
Schlehahn A, Thoma A, Munnelly P, et al. An electrically driven cavity-enhanced source of indistinguishable photons with 61% overall efficiency. APL Photon, 2016, 1(1), 011301 doi: 10.1063/1.4939831
[34]
Deshpande S, Bhattacharya P. An electrically driven quantum dot-in-nanowire visible single photon source operating up to 150 K. Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 103(24), 241117 doi: 10.1063/1.4848195
[35]
Quitsch W, Kümmell T, Gust A, et al. Electrically driven single photon emission from a CdSe/ZnSSe single quantum dot at 200 K. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 105(9), 091102 doi: 10.1063/1.4894729
[36]
Michler P, Imamoglu A, Mason M, et al. Quantum correlation among photons from a single quantum dot at room temperature. Nature, 2000, 406(6799), 968 doi: 10.1038/35023100
[37]
Högele A, Galland C, Winger M, et al. Photon antibunching in the photoluminescence spectra of a single carbon nanotube. Phys Rev Lett, 2008, 100(21), 217401 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.217401
[38]
Sild O, Haller K. Zero-phonon lines: and spectral hole burning in spectroscopy and photochemistry. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012
[39]
Lounis B, Moerner W E. Single photons on demand from a single molecule at room temperature. Nature, 2000, 407(6803), 491 doi: 10.1038/35035032
[40]
Nothaft M, Höhla S, Jelezko F, et al. Electrically driven photon antibunching from a single molecule at room temperature. Nat Commun, 2012, 3, 628 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1637
[41]
Doherty M W, Manson N B, Delaney P, et al. The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond. Phys Rep, 2013, 528(1), 1 doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.02.001
[42]
Khramtsov I A, Agio M, Fedyanin D Y. Dynamics of single-photon emission from electrically pumped color centers. Phys Rev Appl, 2017, 8(2), 024031 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.024031
[43]
Özgür Ü, Alivov Y I, Liu C, et al. A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices. J Appl Phys, 2005, 98(4), 041301 doi: 10.1063/1.1992666
[44]
Choi S, Berhane A M, Gentle A, et al. Electroluminescence from localized defects in zinc oxide: toward electrically driven single photon sources at room temperature. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7(10), 5619 doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b00340
[45]
Khramtsov I A, Vyshnevyy A A, Fedyanin D Y. Enhancing the brightness of electrically driven single-photon sources using color centers in silicon carbide. npj Quantum Inform, 2018, 4(1), 15 doi: 10.1038/s41534-018-0066-2
[46]
Manzeli S, Ovchinnikov D, Pasquier D, et al. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Rev Mater, 2017, 2(8), 17033 doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.33
[47]
Koperski M, Nogajewski K, Arora A, et al. Single photon emitters in exfoliated WSe2 structures. Nat Nano, 2015, 10(6), 503 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.67
[48]
Chakraborty C, Kinnischtzke L, Goodfellow K M, et al. Voltage-controlled quantum light from an atomically thin semicon- ductor. Nat Nano, 2015, 10(6), 507 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.79
[49]
He Y M, Clark G, Schaibley J R, et al. Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors. Nat Nano, 2015, 10(6), 497 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.75
[50]
Palacios-berraquero C, Barbone M, Kara D M, et al. Atomically thin quantum light-emitting diodes. Nat Commun, 2016, 7, 12978 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12978
[51]
Tran T T, Bray K, Ford M J, et al. Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers. Nat Nano, 2016, 11(1), 37 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.242
[52]
Conterio M, Sköld N, Ellis D, et al. A quantum dot single photon source driven by resonant electrical injection. Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 103(16), 162108 doi: 10.1063/1.4825208
Fig. 1.  (Color online) (a) Schematic diagram of a Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment. Second-order correlation function $ g^{(2)}$ (τ) of an ideal SPS working in continuous wave mode (b) and pulse mode (c).

Fig. 2.  (Color online) When two indistinguishable photons encounter a beam splitter simultaneously, the two paths in (a) and (b) are observable, while the two paths in (c) interfere destructively and cancel each other.

Fig. 3.  (Color online) (a) Schematic diagram of forming an exciton state in a QD. (b) Spectrum of a single QD. The exciton (X), biexciton (XX ) and singly charged exciton (X+) emission lines were identified at 10 K[30]. Panel (b) adapted with permission from Ref. [30]. Copyright 2013, American Institute of Physics.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) (a) Schematic of a single-photon emitting diode in cross section[12]. (b) Improved device structure by integrating with a planar cavity. The lateral dimensions of the mesa are 60 × 40 ${\rm \mu}$m2[13]. (c) Illustration of the indistinguishable-photon emitting diode based on a QD micropillar cavity structure[17]. (d) Structure of an electrically driven SPS based on InP QDs[32]. (e) Schematic of an InGaN dot-in-GaN nanowire p–n junction grown on (111) silicon by MBE. A 2-nm quantum dot is placed at the center of doped GaN regions[14]. (f) Schematic of the heterostructure grown on GaN-on-sapphire by MBE to form a single-photon diode[15]. Panel (a) adapted with permission from Ref. [12]. Copyright 2002, American Association for the Advancement of Science. Panel (b) adapted with permission from Ref. [13]. Copyright 2007, American Institute of Physics. Panel (c) adapted with permission from Ref. [17]. Copyright 2010, American Institute of Physics. Panel (d) adapted with permission from Ref. [31]. Copyright 2008, The Optical Society. Panel (e) adapted with permission from Ref. [14]. Copyright 2013, Springer Nature Publishing AG. Panel (f) adapted with permission from Ref. [15]. Copyright 2014, American Institute of Physics.

Fig. 5.  (Color online) (a) Schematic diagram of the key components of a electrically driven SPS based on CQD. (b) $g^{(2)}{(\tau)}$ curve of a quantum-dot driven at 2.6 V indicates the generation of single-photons with high purity[18]. Panel (a) and (b) adapted with permission from Ref. [18]. Copyright 2017, Springer Nature Publishing AG.

Fig. 6.  (Color online) (a) Schematic view of a waveguide with integrated single carbon nanotube and two SNSPDs. (b) Optical micrograph of the metallic contacts and the waveguide. The positions of the detectors and emitter are denoted by D and E, respectively[19]. Panel (a) and (b) adapted with permission from Ref. [19]. Copyright 2016, Springer Nature Publishing AG.

Fig. 7.  (Color online) (a) Schematic diagram of STM-induced fluorescence from a single molecule. Molecular fluorescence was generated by the excitation of highly localized tunneling electrons over a single ZnPc molecule that was decoupled by NaCl layers from the Ag(100) substrate. (b) Second-order correlation measurements of single-molecule electroluminescence[20]. Panel (a) and (b) adapted with permission from Ref. [20]. Copyright 2017, Springer Nature Publishing AG.

Fig. 8.  (Color online) (a) Schematic diagram of the single-photon emitting diode based on NV centers in diamond[22]. (b) Schematic diagrams of SiC SPS and optical measurement setup[24]. Panel (a) adapted with permission from Ref. [22]. Copyright 2012, Macmillan Publishers Limited. Panel (b) adapted with permission from Ref. [24]. Copyright 2015, Springer Nature Publishing AG.

Fig. 9.  (Color online) (a) Optical microscope image of a LED device by vertical stacking of thin layer semiconductors. (b) Confocal microscope image of the electroluminescence from monolayer and bilayer WSe2 areas with an injection current of 3 μA (12.4 V). The dotted circles highlight the submicron localized emission in this device. (c) Second-order correlation measurement of electroluminescence from a single quantum emitter with $g^{(2)}(0)=0.29\pm0.08$[50]. Panel (a), (b) and (c) adapted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2016, Springer Nature Publishing AG.

[1]
Nielsen M A, Chuang I L. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010
[2]
Sun Q C, Mao Y L, Chen S J, et al. Quantum teleportation with independent sources and prior entanglement distribution over a network. Nat Photon, 2016, 10(10), 671 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.179
[3]
O’brien J L. Optical quantum computing. Science, 2007, 318(5856), 1567 doi: 10.1126/science.1142892
[4]
Arcari M, Söllner I, Javadi A, et al. Near-unity coupling efficiency of a quantum emitter to a photonic crystal waveguide. Phys Rev Lett, 2014, 113(9), 093603 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.093603
[5]
Carolan J, Harrold C, Sparrow C, et al. Universal linear optics. Science, 2015, 349(6249), 711 doi: 10.1126/science.aab3642
[6]
Wang J, Paesani S, Ding Y, et al. Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics. Science, 2018, 360(6386), 285 doi: 10.1126/science.aar7053
[7]
Smith B J, Kundys D, Thomas-Peter N, et al. Phase-controlled integrated photonic quantum circuits. Opt Express, 2009, 17(16), 13516 doi: 10.1364/OE.17.013516
[8]
Takesue H, Matsuda N, Kuramochi E, et al. An on-chip coupled resonator optical waveguide single-photon buffer. Nat Commun, 2013, 4, 2725 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3725
[9]
Pernice W H, Schuck C, Minaeva O, et al. High-speed and high-efficiency travelling wave single-photon detectors embedded in nanophotonic circuits. Nat Commun, 2012, 3, 1325 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2307
[10]
Sprengers J, Gaggero A, Sahin D, et al. Waveguide superconducting single-photon detectors for integrated quantum photonic circuits. Appl Phys Lett, 2011, 99(18), 181110 doi: 10.1063/1.3657518
[11]
Senellart P, Solomon G, White A. High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. Nat Nano, 2017, 12(11), 1026 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2017.218
[12]
Yuan Z, Kardynal B E, Stevenson R M, et al. Electrically driven single-photon source. Science, 2002, 295(5552), 102 doi: 10.1126/science.1066790
[13]
Ward M, Farrow T, See P, et al. Electrically driven telecommunication wavelength single-photon source. Appl Phys Lett, 2007, 90(6), 063512 doi: 10.1063/1.2472172
[14]
Deshpande S, Heo J, Das A, et al. Electrically driven polarized single-photon emission from an InGaN quantum dot in a GaN nanowire. Nat Commun, 2013, 4, 1675 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2691
[15]
Deshpande S, Frost T, Hazari A, et al. Electrically pumped single-photon emission at room temperature from a single In- GaN/GaN quantum dot. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 105(14), 141109 doi: 10.1063/1.4897640
[16]
Nowak A, Portalupi S, Giesz V, et al. Deterministic and electrically tunable bright single-photon source. Nat Commun, 2014, 5, 3240 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4240
[17]
Heindel T, Schneider C, Lermer M, et al. Electrically driven quantum dot-micropillar single photon source with 34% overall efficiency. Appl Phys Lett, 2010, 96(1), 011107 doi: 10.1063/1.3284514
[18]
Lin X, Dai X, Pu C, et al. Electrically-driven single-photon sources based on colloidal quantum dots with near-optimal antibunching at room temperature. Nat Commun, 2017, 8(1), 1132 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01379-6
[19]
Khasminskaya S, Pyatkov F, Słowik K, et al. Fully integrated quantum photonic circuit with an electrically driven light source. Nat Photon, 2016, 10(11), 727 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.178
[20]
Zhang L, Yu Y J, Chen L G, et al. Electrically driven single-photon emission from an isolated single molecule. Nat Commun, 2017, 8(1), 580 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00681-7
[21]
Lohrmann A, Pezzagna S, Dobrinets I, et al. Diamond based light-emitting diode for visible single-photon emission at room temperature. Appl Phys Lett, 2011, 99(25), 251106 doi: 10.1063/1.3670332
[22]
Mizuochi N, Makino T, Kato H, et al. Electrically driven single-photon source at room temperature in diamond. Nat Photon, 2012, 6(5), 299 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.75
[23]
Doi Y, Makino T, Kato H, et al. Deterministic electrical charge-state initialization of single nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond. Phys Rev X, 2014, 4(1), 011057 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011057
[24]
Lohrmann A, Iwamoto N, Bodrog Z, et al. Single-photon emitting diode in silicon carbide. Nat Commun, 2015, 6, 7783 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8783
[25]
Glauber R J. The quantum theory of optical coherence. Phys Rev, 1963, 130(6), 2529 doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.130.2529
[26]
Brown R H, Twiss R Q, surName g. Interferometry of the intensity fluctuations in light-i. basic theory: the correlation between photons in coherent beams of radiation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1957, 242(1230), 300 doi: 10.1098/rspa.1957.0177
[27]
Wang H, Duan Z C, Li Y H, et al. Near-transform-limited single photons from an efficient solid-state quantum emitter. Phys Rev Lett, 2016, 116(21), 213601 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.213601
[28]
Hong C K, Ou Z Y, Mandel L. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys Rev Lett, 1987, 59(18), 2044 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2044
[29]
Imamog A, Yamamoto Y, et al. Turnstile device for heralded single photons: Coulomb blockade of electron and hole tunnel- ing in quantum confined p–i–n heterojunctions. Phys Rev Lett, 1994, 72(2), 210 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.210
[30]
Gschrey M, Gericke F, Schüßler A, et al. In situ electron-beam lithography of deterministic single-quantum-dot mesa-structures using low-temperature cathodoluminescence spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 102(25), 251113 doi: 10.1063/1.4812343
[31]
Somaschi N, Giesz V, De Santis L, et al. Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state. Nat Photonics, 2016, 10(5), 340 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.23
[32]
Reischle M, Beirne G, Schulz W M, et al. Electrically pumped single-photon emission in the visible spectral range up to 80 K. Opt Express, 2008, 16(17), 12771 doi: 10.1364/OE.16.012771
[33]
Schlehahn A, Thoma A, Munnelly P, et al. An electrically driven cavity-enhanced source of indistinguishable photons with 61% overall efficiency. APL Photon, 2016, 1(1), 011301 doi: 10.1063/1.4939831
[34]
Deshpande S, Bhattacharya P. An electrically driven quantum dot-in-nanowire visible single photon source operating up to 150 K. Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 103(24), 241117 doi: 10.1063/1.4848195
[35]
Quitsch W, Kümmell T, Gust A, et al. Electrically driven single photon emission from a CdSe/ZnSSe single quantum dot at 200 K. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 105(9), 091102 doi: 10.1063/1.4894729
[36]
Michler P, Imamoglu A, Mason M, et al. Quantum correlation among photons from a single quantum dot at room temperature. Nature, 2000, 406(6799), 968 doi: 10.1038/35023100
[37]
Högele A, Galland C, Winger M, et al. Photon antibunching in the photoluminescence spectra of a single carbon nanotube. Phys Rev Lett, 2008, 100(21), 217401 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.217401
[38]
Sild O, Haller K. Zero-phonon lines: and spectral hole burning in spectroscopy and photochemistry. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012
[39]
Lounis B, Moerner W E. Single photons on demand from a single molecule at room temperature. Nature, 2000, 407(6803), 491 doi: 10.1038/35035032
[40]
Nothaft M, Höhla S, Jelezko F, et al. Electrically driven photon antibunching from a single molecule at room temperature. Nat Commun, 2012, 3, 628 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1637
[41]
Doherty M W, Manson N B, Delaney P, et al. The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond. Phys Rep, 2013, 528(1), 1 doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.02.001
[42]
Khramtsov I A, Agio M, Fedyanin D Y. Dynamics of single-photon emission from electrically pumped color centers. Phys Rev Appl, 2017, 8(2), 024031 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.024031
[43]
Özgür Ü, Alivov Y I, Liu C, et al. A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices. J Appl Phys, 2005, 98(4), 041301 doi: 10.1063/1.1992666
[44]
Choi S, Berhane A M, Gentle A, et al. Electroluminescence from localized defects in zinc oxide: toward electrically driven single photon sources at room temperature. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7(10), 5619 doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b00340
[45]
Khramtsov I A, Vyshnevyy A A, Fedyanin D Y. Enhancing the brightness of electrically driven single-photon sources using color centers in silicon carbide. npj Quantum Inform, 2018, 4(1), 15 doi: 10.1038/s41534-018-0066-2
[46]
Manzeli S, Ovchinnikov D, Pasquier D, et al. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Rev Mater, 2017, 2(8), 17033 doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.33
[47]
Koperski M, Nogajewski K, Arora A, et al. Single photon emitters in exfoliated WSe2 structures. Nat Nano, 2015, 10(6), 503 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.67
[48]
Chakraborty C, Kinnischtzke L, Goodfellow K M, et al. Voltage-controlled quantum light from an atomically thin semicon- ductor. Nat Nano, 2015, 10(6), 507 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.79
[49]
He Y M, Clark G, Schaibley J R, et al. Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors. Nat Nano, 2015, 10(6), 497 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.75
[50]
Palacios-berraquero C, Barbone M, Kara D M, et al. Atomically thin quantum light-emitting diodes. Nat Commun, 2016, 7, 12978 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12978
[51]
Tran T T, Bray K, Ford M J, et al. Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers. Nat Nano, 2016, 11(1), 37 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.242
[52]
Conterio M, Sköld N, Ellis D, et al. A quantum dot single photon source driven by resonant electrical injection. Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 103(16), 162108 doi: 10.1063/1.4825208
1. Li, J., Wang, Y., Zhu, R. et al. Nitrogen-Dependent Electronic Properties of Threading Edge Dislocations in 4H-SiC. ACS Applied Electronic Materials, 2023, 5(5): 2664-2669. doi:10.1021/acsaelm.3c00137
2. Wang, W., Lu, X., Wu, X. et al. Chemical–Mechanical Polishing of 4H Silicon Carbide Wafers. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 2023, 10(13): 2202369. doi:10.1002/admi.202202369
3. Zhang, X., Liu, X., Wang, Y. et al. Optimizing the flatness of 4H-silicon carbide wafers by tuning the sequence of lapping. Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2023, 38(3): 034001. doi:10.1088/1361-6641/acb1ce
4. Yang, G., Luo, H., Li, J. et al. Discrimination of dislocations in 4H-SiC by inclination angles of molten-alkali etched pits. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 43(12): 122801. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/43/12/122801
5. Niu, X., Sang, L., Luo, W. et al. Effect of mixed PN on the electrical characteristics of 1200V/20A 4H-SiC MPS diodes. 2023. doi:10.1109/SSLChinaIFWS60785.2023.10399689
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Xi Wang, Yiwen Zhong, Hongbin Pu, Jichao Hu, Xianfeng Feng, Guowen Yang. Investigation of lateral spreading current in the 4H-SiC Schottky barrier diode chip[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(11): 112802. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112802
    X Wang, Y W Zhong, H B Pu, J C Hu, X F Feng, G W Yang, Investigation of lateral spreading current in the 4H-SiC Schottky barrier diode chip[J]. J. Semicond., 2021, 42(11): 112802. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112802.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 4670 Times PDF downloads: 170 Times Cited by: 5 Times

    History

    Received: 01 July 2018 Revised: Online: Accepted Manuscript: 25 June 2019Uncorrected proof: 26 June 2019Published: 05 July 2019

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Xi Wang, Yiwen Zhong, Hongbin Pu, Jichao Hu, Xianfeng Feng, Guowen Yang. Investigation of lateral spreading current in the 4H-SiC Schottky barrier diode chip[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(11): 112802. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112802 ****X Wang, Y W Zhong, H B Pu, J C Hu, X F Feng, G W Yang, Investigation of lateral spreading current in the 4H-SiC Schottky barrier diode chip[J]. J. Semicond., 2021, 42(11): 112802. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112802.
      Citation:
      Yating Lin, Yongzheng Ye, Wei Fang. Electrically driven single-photon sources[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(7): 071904. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/7/071904 ****
      Y T Lin, Y Z Ye, W Fang, Electrically driven single-photon sources[J]. J. Semicond., 2019, 40(7): 071904. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/7/071904.

      Electrically driven single-photon sources

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/7/071904
      More Information
      • Corresponding author: Email: wfang08@zju.edu.cn
      • Received Date: 2018-07-01
      • Published Date: 2019-07-01

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return