J. Semicond. > 2021, Volume 42 > Issue 7 > 070203

RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS

Engineering microstructures for efficient Sb2(S xSe1−x)3 solar cells

Rongfeng Tang1, Tao Chen1, and Liming Ding2,

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Tao Chen, tchenmse@ustc.edu.cn; Liming Ding, ding@nanoctr.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/7/070203

PDF

Turn off MathJax

To realize solar-to-electrical energy conversion, several kinds of solar technologies have been developed since the invention of silicon solar cells. Recently, antimony selenosulfide Sb2(S,Se)3 (including Sb2S3 and Sb2Se3) has been considered one of the promising emerging materials for solar cell applications due to simple chemical composition, abundant elemental storage and excellent stability[1]. In terms of practical applications, a solar technology should simultaneously possess high-efficiency, low-cost and long-term stability. The stability for these materials and related devices has already been examined[2-4]. In particular, Sb2Se3 solar cells have passed through the stringent stability test[4]. Furthermore, the compound is non-toxic and doesn’t contain rare elements, which sets the ground for future low-cost production. The optical bandgap for antimony selenosulfide lies in 1.1–1.7 eV[1], falling into the optimal region for sunlight absorption. According to the Shockley-Queisser limit, ~32% PCE can be expected for Sb2(S,Se)3 solar cells.

In practical, one of the basic requirements for making efficient solar cells is to prepare high-quality absorber films. Recently, Tang et al. reported a hydrothermal deposition method (Figs. 1(a) and 1(b)), which produced flat and compact Sb2(S,Se)3 films with large grains[5]. The increase of selenium content in the compound can suppress the deep-level defects of anti-site SbS, while not yielding new defect SbSe. This characteristic suggests an effective strategy for suppressing the deep-level defects. At suitable Se/(S+Se) atomic ratio, Sb2(S,Se)3 solar cells can break the 10% bottleneck efficiency[5, 6], which is recorded in the record-efficiency cells table collected by AMOLF (Fig. 1(c), SbSSe stands for Sb2(S,Se)3 solar cells).

Figure  1.  (Color online) (a) Crystal structure of Sb2S(e)3. (b) Schematic for the hydrothermal deposition of Sb2(S,Se)3 in an autoclave, Copyright 2020, Springer Nature[5]. (c) Shockley-Queisser limit (black line) achieved by record-efficiency cells, grey lines showing 75% and 50% of the limit, Copyright 2020, https://www.lmpv.nl/sq/. (d) Two-step formation process of self-trapped excitons (STEs) in Sb2S3: hole is self-trapped first and then electron is captured by trapped hole to form STE, Copyright 2019, Springer Nature[10]. (e) Schematic diagram for the carrier transport near the dislocations along (001) orientation of Sb2Se3, Copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons[11]. (f) EDX line scan for sample Sb2Se3/CdS (Sb2Se3 from CSS approach), Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society[12].

Because of the unique quasi-one-dimensional (Q1D) structure, the suitably oriented crystal is critical for efficient charge transport, which is quite different from the three-dimensional (3D) absorbers. In this case, vapor deposition methods, like rapid thermal evaporation (RTE), vapor transport deposition (VTD), closed-space sublimation (CSS), show strong ability to tune the crystal orientation[4, 7-9]. The high-temperature and low-pressure reactive system enables the fast grain growth, thus kinetically facilitating tilted (Sb4S(e)6)n ribbons on the substrate. However, it was observed that although the favorable orientation was obtained in high percentage, the efficiency did not show great improvement. This causes new concerns regarding the efficiency improvement in this class of solar cells[10-12]. Further investigations on the materials and device characteristics generate new understanding on fundamental issues associated mainly with the microstructures of antimony selenosulfide.

It is generally accepted that the Voc loss in antimony selenosulfide solar cells is one of the critical factors impeding the efficiency improvement. This deficit is usually ascribed to the defects which lead to increased recombination and dark current[13]. Nonetheless, Yang et al. recently demonstrated that the intrinsically self-trapping in Sb2S3 film is primarily responsible for this substantial energy loss[10]. The spectroscopic study of excited-state carrier properties suggests that the lattice deformation in this film gives rise to self-trapped excitons and thus transient defect state in bandgap (Fig. 1(d)). With this energy loss, the maximum Voc is limited to ~0.8 V for Sb2S3 solar cells, which matches the obtained top Voc of 0.8 V in Ref. [14]. This finding pointed out that the suppression of self-trapping effect is able to essentially increase the device efficiency. Plausibly, further investigating similar phenomenon in the alloy-type Sb2(S,Se)3 and pure selenide Sb2Se3 would be much interesting and significant for understanding the basic properties of this class Q1D materials and efficiency improvement.

The Q1D structure was also found to cause microstructure dislocations. Recently, Li et al. demonstrated that the stress generated during fast grain growth in achieving preferred [hk1]-oriented Sb2Se3 film brings forth the dislocations (Fig. 1(e)). This structure characteristic results in low carrier mobility and carrier density even in films with favorable orientation, thus limiting the efficiency improvement[11]. According to the detailed measurement, the majority carrier mobility in Sb2S3 and Sb2Se3 exhibits orders of magnitude lower than that in Cu2ZnSnSe4 (CZTSe). Therefore, developing advanced process to delicately controlling over the crystal growth becomes essential for obtaining high-quality antimony chalcogenide absorber films.

To date, highly efficient Sb2(S,Se)3 solar cells are primarily obtained by using CdS as the electron-transporting material (ETM). Most recently, a few theoretical studies were conducted to analyze the interfacial properties and in turn provide resolved strategies[12, 15]. Williams et al. indicated that the unstable Sb2Se3/CdS interface inevitably led to Sb and Se diffusing into CdS layer, thus deteriorating the Sb2Se3 layer and forming interfacial voids (Fig. 1(f))[12]. As a consequence, substantial interfacial defects were generated. This phenomenon becomes particularly serious in films from high-temperature deposition process. Even in Sb2(S,Se)3 film made with low-temperature hydrothermal deposition, a simulation study showed that the interface recombination between CdS and Sb2(S,Se)3 still gave rise to large Voc loss. Optimistically, seeking ideal ETM/Sb2(S,Se)3 junction with favourable lattice coupling and band alignment is expected to improve efficiency[15].

In summary, the deposition method, the film quality, the grain size, and the defect density are critical factors determining the performance for Sb2(S,Se)3 solar cells. How to reduce the defects, to optimize ETM/Sb2(S,Se)3 interface, to increase charge mobility, to reduce Voc loss, thus enhancing the device efficiency, is the mission in developing this new solar technology.

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22005293, U19A2092), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (BH2060000144), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFA0405600). L. Ding thanks the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0206600) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51773045, 21772030, 51922032, 21961160720).



[1]
Lei H W, Chen J J, Tan Z J, et al. Review of recent progress in antimony chalcogenide-based solar cells: materials and devices. Sol RRL, 2019, 3, 1900026 doi: 10.1002/solr.201900026
[2]
Deng H, Zeng Y Y, Ishaq M, et al. Quasiepitaxy strategy for efficient full-inorganic Sb2S3 solar cells. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29, 1901720 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201901720
[3]
Wu C Y, Lian W T, Zhang L J, et al. Water additive enhanced solution processing of alloy Sb2(S1– xSex)3-based solar cells. Sol RRL, 2020, 4, 1900582 doi: 10.1002/solr.201900582
[4]
Wang L, Li D B, Li K H, et al. Stable 6%-efficient Sb2Se3 solar cells with a ZnO buffer layer. Nat Energy, 2017, 2, 17046 doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.46
[5]
Tang R F, Wang X M, Lian W T, et al. Hydrothermal deposition of antimony selenosulfide thin films enables solar cells with 10% efficiency. Nat Energy, 2020, 5, 587 doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0652-3
[6]
Wang X M, Tang R F, Jiang C H, et al. Manipulating the electrical properties of Sb2(S, Se)3 film for high-efficiency solar cell. Adv Energy Mater, 2020, 10, 2002341 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202002341
[7]
Wen X X, Chen C, Lu S C, et al. Vapor transport deposition of antimony selenide thin film solar cells with 7.6% efficiency. Nat Commun, 2018, 9, 2179 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04634-6
[8]
Li Z Q, Liang X Y, Li G, et al. 9.2%-efficient core-shell structured antimony selenide nanorod array solar cells. Nat Commun, 2019, 10, 125 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07903-6
[9]
Zhou Y, Wang L, Chen S Y, et al. Thin-film Sb2Se3 photovoltaics with oriented one-dimensional ribbons and benign grain boundaries. Nat Photonics, 2015, 9, 409 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.78
[10]
Yang Z L, Wang X M, Chen Y Z, et al. Ultrafast self-trapping of photoexcited carriers sets the upper limit onantimony trisulfide photovoltaic devices. Nat Commun, 2019, 10, 4540 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12445-6
[11]
Li J J, Huang J L, Li K H, et al. Defect-resolved effective majority carrier mobility in highly anisotropic antimony chalcogenide thin-film solar cells. Sol RRL, 2021, 5, 2000693 doi: 10.1002/solr.202000693
[12]
Williams R E, Ramasse Q M, McKenna K P, et al. Evidence for self-healing benign grain boundaries and a highly defective Sb2Se3-CdS interfacial layer in Sb2Se3 thin-film photovoltaics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12, 21730 doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c03690
[13]
Chen C, Tang J. Open-circuit voltage loss of antimony chalcogenide solar cells: status, origin, and possible solutions. ACS Energy Lett, 2020, 5, 2294 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00940
[14]
Maiti A, Chatterjee S, Pal A J. Sulfur-vacancy passivation in solution-processed Sb2S3 thin films: Influence on photovoltaic interfaces. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2020, 3, 810 doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b01951
[15]
Ayala-Mató F, Vigil-Galán O, Nicolás-Marín M M, et al. Study of loss mechanisms on Sb2(S1– xSex)3 solar cell with n-i-p structure: Toward an efficiency promotion. Appl Phys Lett, 2021, 118, 73903 doi: 10.1063/5.0032867
Fig. 1.  (Color online) (a) Crystal structure of Sb2S(e)3. (b) Schematic for the hydrothermal deposition of Sb2(S,Se)3 in an autoclave, Copyright 2020, Springer Nature[5]. (c) Shockley-Queisser limit (black line) achieved by record-efficiency cells, grey lines showing 75% and 50% of the limit, Copyright 2020, https://www.lmpv.nl/sq/. (d) Two-step formation process of self-trapped excitons (STEs) in Sb2S3: hole is self-trapped first and then electron is captured by trapped hole to form STE, Copyright 2019, Springer Nature[10]. (e) Schematic diagram for the carrier transport near the dislocations along (001) orientation of Sb2Se3, Copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons[11]. (f) EDX line scan for sample Sb2Se3/CdS (Sb2Se3 from CSS approach), Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society[12].

[1]
Lei H W, Chen J J, Tan Z J, et al. Review of recent progress in antimony chalcogenide-based solar cells: materials and devices. Sol RRL, 2019, 3, 1900026 doi: 10.1002/solr.201900026
[2]
Deng H, Zeng Y Y, Ishaq M, et al. Quasiepitaxy strategy for efficient full-inorganic Sb2S3 solar cells. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29, 1901720 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201901720
[3]
Wu C Y, Lian W T, Zhang L J, et al. Water additive enhanced solution processing of alloy Sb2(S1– xSex)3-based solar cells. Sol RRL, 2020, 4, 1900582 doi: 10.1002/solr.201900582
[4]
Wang L, Li D B, Li K H, et al. Stable 6%-efficient Sb2Se3 solar cells with a ZnO buffer layer. Nat Energy, 2017, 2, 17046 doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.46
[5]
Tang R F, Wang X M, Lian W T, et al. Hydrothermal deposition of antimony selenosulfide thin films enables solar cells with 10% efficiency. Nat Energy, 2020, 5, 587 doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0652-3
[6]
Wang X M, Tang R F, Jiang C H, et al. Manipulating the electrical properties of Sb2(S, Se)3 film for high-efficiency solar cell. Adv Energy Mater, 2020, 10, 2002341 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202002341
[7]
Wen X X, Chen C, Lu S C, et al. Vapor transport deposition of antimony selenide thin film solar cells with 7.6% efficiency. Nat Commun, 2018, 9, 2179 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04634-6
[8]
Li Z Q, Liang X Y, Li G, et al. 9.2%-efficient core-shell structured antimony selenide nanorod array solar cells. Nat Commun, 2019, 10, 125 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07903-6
[9]
Zhou Y, Wang L, Chen S Y, et al. Thin-film Sb2Se3 photovoltaics with oriented one-dimensional ribbons and benign grain boundaries. Nat Photonics, 2015, 9, 409 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.78
[10]
Yang Z L, Wang X M, Chen Y Z, et al. Ultrafast self-trapping of photoexcited carriers sets the upper limit onantimony trisulfide photovoltaic devices. Nat Commun, 2019, 10, 4540 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12445-6
[11]
Li J J, Huang J L, Li K H, et al. Defect-resolved effective majority carrier mobility in highly anisotropic antimony chalcogenide thin-film solar cells. Sol RRL, 2021, 5, 2000693 doi: 10.1002/solr.202000693
[12]
Williams R E, Ramasse Q M, McKenna K P, et al. Evidence for self-healing benign grain boundaries and a highly defective Sb2Se3-CdS interfacial layer in Sb2Se3 thin-film photovoltaics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12, 21730 doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c03690
[13]
Chen C, Tang J. Open-circuit voltage loss of antimony chalcogenide solar cells: status, origin, and possible solutions. ACS Energy Lett, 2020, 5, 2294 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00940
[14]
Maiti A, Chatterjee S, Pal A J. Sulfur-vacancy passivation in solution-processed Sb2S3 thin films: Influence on photovoltaic interfaces. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2020, 3, 810 doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b01951
[15]
Ayala-Mató F, Vigil-Galán O, Nicolás-Marín M M, et al. Study of loss mechanisms on Sb2(S1– xSex)3 solar cell with n-i-p structure: Toward an efficiency promotion. Appl Phys Lett, 2021, 118, 73903 doi: 10.1063/5.0032867
1

Improved efficiency and photo-stability of methylamine-free perovskite solar cells via cadmium doping

Yong Chen, Yang Zhao, Qiufeng Ye, Zema Chu, Zhigang Yin, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(12): 122201. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/12/122201

2

Simulation and application of external quantum efficiency of solar cells based on spectroscopy

Guanlin Chen, Can Han, Lingling Yan, Yuelong Li, Ying Zhao, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(12): 122701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/12/122701

3

Surface passivation of perovskite film for efficient solar cells

Yang (Michael) Yang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(4): 040204. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/4/040204

4

Engineering in-plane silicon nanowire springs for highly stretchable electronics

Zhaoguo Xue, Taige Dong, Zhimin Zhu, Yaolong Zhao, Ying Sun, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(1): 011001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/1/011001

5

Interfacial engineering of printable bottom back metal electrodes for full-solution processed flexible organic solar cells

Hongyu Zhen, Kan Li, Yaokang Zhang, Lina Chen, Liyong Niu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(1): 014002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/1/014002

6

Substrate temperature dependent studies on properties of chemical spray pyrolysis deposited CdS thin films for solar cell applications

Kiran Diwate, Amit Pawbake, Sachin Rondiya, Rupali Kulkarni, Ravi Waykar, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(2): 023001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/2/023001

7

ZnO1-xTex and ZnO1-xSx semiconductor alloys as competent materials for opto-electronic and solar cell applications:a comparative analysis

Utsa Das, Partha P. Pal

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(8): 082001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/8/082001

8

Comment on Chen et al. "Fabrication and photovoltaic conversion enhancement of graphene/n-Si Schottky barrier solar cells by electrophoretic deposition", Electrochimica Acta, 2014

Lara Valentic, Nima E. Gorji

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(9): 094012. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/9/094012

9

An InGaAs graded buffer layer in solar cells

Xiaosheng Qu, Hongyin Bao, Hanieh. S. Nikjalal, Liling Xiong, Hongxin Zhen, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(1): 014011. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/1/014011

10

Chemical mechanical planarization of amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5 with a soft pad

Aodong He, Bo Liu, Zhitang Song, Yegang Lü, Juntao Li, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(7): 076002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/7/076002

11

Radiation effect on the optical and electrical properties of CdSe(In)/p-Si heterojunction photovoltaic solar cells

M. Ashry, S. Fares

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(10): 102001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/10/102001

12

Influence of absorber doping in a-SiC:H/a-Si:H/a-SiGe:H solar cells

Muhammad Nawaz, Ashfaq Ahmad

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(4): 042001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/4/042001

13

Effect of current on the microstructure and performance of (Bi2Te3)0.2(Sb2Te3)0.8 thermoelectric material via field activated and pressure assisted sintering

Chen Ruixue, Meng Qingsen, Fan Wenhao, Wang Zhong

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(7): 073001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/7/073001

14

Physical properties of hematite α-Fe2O3 thin films: application to photoelectrochemical solar cells

S. S. Shinde, R. A. Bansode, C. H. Bhosale, K. Y. Rajpure

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(1): 013001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/1/013001

15

Prediction model for the diffusion length in silicon-based solar cells

Cheknane A, Benouaz T

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(7): 072001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/7/072001

16

TDDB improvement by optimized processes on metal–insulator–silicon capacitors with atomic layer deposition of Al2O3 and multi layers of TiN film structure

Peng Kun, Wang Biao, Xiao Deyuan, Qiu Shengfen, Lin D C, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 082005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/082005

17

Effect of chemical polish etching and post annealing on the performance of silicon heterojunction solar cells

Jiang Zhenyu, Dou Yuhua, Zhang Yu, Zhou Yuqin, Liu Fengzhen, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 084010. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/084010

18

Laterally Electrostatically Driven Poly 3C-SiC Folded-Beam Resonant Microstructures

Wang Liang, Zhao Yongmei, Ning Jin, Sun Guosheng, Wang Lei, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(8): 1453-1456.

19

Design and Implementation of a Novel Area-Efficient Interpolator

Peng Yunfeng, Kong Derui, Zhou Feng

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(7): 1164-1169.

20

Structural Characteristic of CdS Thin films and Their Influence on Cu(in,Ga)Se2(CIGS) Thin Film Solar Cell

Xue Yuming, Sun Yun, He Qing, Liu Fangfang, Li Changjian,and Ji Mingliang, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(2): 225-229.

1. Cao, Y., Ling, T., Qu, P. et al. Spectral Response and Performance Optimization of Antimony Based Solar Cells Under Weak Light | [弱光下锑基太阳电池的光谱响应与性能优化]. Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi/Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2024, 44(2): 519-526. doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2024)02-0519-08
2. Gao, J., Tang, R., Cai, H. et al. Oriented Organization of Poly(3-Hexylthiophene) for Efficient and Stable Antimony Sulfide Solar Cells. Energy and Environmental Materials, 2023, 6(6): e12453. doi:10.1002/eem2.12453
3. Veeramalai, C.P., Xu, Y., Chen, Y. et al. Photoelectronic properties of antimony selenide nanowire synthesized by hydrothermal method. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.131889
4. Shi, X., Zhang, F., Dai, S. et al. Nanorod-textured Sb2(S, Se)3 bilayer with enhanced light harvesting and accelerated charge extraction for high-efficiency Sb2(S, Se)3 solar cells. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.135341
5. Lian, W., Cao, R., Li, G. et al. Distinctive Deep-Level Defects in Non-Stoichiometric Sb2Se3 Photovoltaic Materials. Advanced Science, 2022, 9(9): 2105268. doi:10.1002/advs.202105268
6. Wang, Y., Tang, R., Huang, L. et al. Post-Treatment of TiO2Film Enables High-Quality Sb2Se3Film Deposition for Solar Cell Applications. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 2022. doi:10.1021/acsami.2c07157
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Rongfeng Tang, Tao Chen, Liming Ding. Engineering microstructures for efficient Sb2(S xSe1−x)3 solar cells[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(7): 070203. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/7/070203
    R F Tang, T Chen, L M Ding, Engineering microstructures for efficient Sb2(S xSe1−x)3 solar cells[J]. J. Semicond., 2021, 42(7): 070203. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/7/070203.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 2207 Times PDF downloads: 71 Times Cited by: 6 Times

    History

    Received: 30 April 2021 Revised: Online: Accepted Manuscript: 06 May 2021Uncorrected proof: 06 May 2021Published: 05 July 2021

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Rongfeng Tang, Tao Chen, Liming Ding. Engineering microstructures for efficient Sb2(S xSe1−x)3 solar cells[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(7): 070203. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/7/070203 ****R F Tang, T Chen, L M Ding, Engineering microstructures for efficient Sb2(S xSe1−x)3 solar cells[J]. J. Semicond., 2021, 42(7): 070203. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/7/070203.
      Citation:
      Rongfeng Tang, Tao Chen, Liming Ding. Engineering microstructures for efficient Sb2(S xSe1−x)3 solar cells[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(7): 070203. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/7/070203 ****
      R F Tang, T Chen, L M Ding, Engineering microstructures for efficient Sb2(S xSe1−x)3 solar cells[J]. J. Semicond., 2021, 42(7): 070203. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/7/070203.

      Engineering microstructures for efficient Sb2(S xSe1−x)3 solar cells

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/7/070203
      More Information
      • Rongfeng Tang:received her PhD degree in 2019 from University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) under the supervision of Professor Tao Chen. Currently she is a postdoc in Tao Chen group. Her research focuses on antimony chalcogenides semiconductors and devices
      • Tao Chen:obtained his PhD degree from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, in 2010. In 2011, he joined Department of Physics, Chinese University of Hong Kong as a research assistant professor. Since 2015, he has been working in Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China as a full professor. His work focuses on metal chalcogenides solar cells
      • Liming Ding:got his PhD from University of Science and Technology of China (was a joint student at Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, CAS). He started his research on OSCs and PLEDs in Olle Inganäs Lab in 1998. Later on, he worked at National Center for Polymer Research, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and Argonne National Lab (USA). He joined Konarka as a Senior Scientist in 2008. In 2010, he joined National Center for Nanoscience and Technology as a full professor. His research focuses on innovative materials and devices. He is RSC Fellow, the nominator for Xplorer Prize, and the Associate Editors for Science Bulletin and Journal of Semiconductors
      • Corresponding author: tchenmse@ustc.edu.cnding@nanoctr.cn
      • Received Date: 2021-04-30
      • Published Date: 2021-07-10

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return