High-power InAlAs/InGaAs Schottky barrier photodiodes for analog microwave signal transmission

K. S. Zhuravlev; A. L. Chizh; K. B. Mikitchuk; A. M. Gilinsky; I. B. Chistokhin; N. A. Valisheva; D. V. Dmitriev; A. I. Toropov; M. S. Aksenov

doi:10.1088/1674-4926/43/1/012302

J. Semicond. > 2022, Volume 43 > Issue 1 > 012302

ARTICLES

High-power InAlAs/InGaAs Schottky barrier photodiodes for analog microwave signal transmission

K. S. Zhuravlev^1,, A. L. Chizh², K. B. Mikitchuk², A. M. Gilinsky¹, I. B. Chistokhin¹, N. A. Valisheva¹, D. V. Dmitriev¹, A. I. Toropov¹ and M. S. Aksenov¹

+ Author Affiliations

Corresponding author: K. S. Zhuravlev, zhur@isp.nsc.ru

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/1/012302

Abstract: The design, manufacturing and DC and microwave characterization of high-power Schottky barrier InAlAs/InGaAs back-illuminated mesa structure photodiodes are presented. The photodiodes with 10 and 15 μm mesa diameters operate at ≥40 and 28 GHz, respectively, have the output RF power as high as 58 mW at a frequency of 20 GHz, the DC responsivity of up to 1.08 A/W depending on the absorbing layer thickness, and a photodiode dark current as low as 0.04 nA. We show that these photodiodes provide an advantage in the amplitude-to-phase conversion factor which makes them suitable for use in high-speed analog transmission lines with stringent requirements for phase noise.

Key words: InAlAs/InGaAs heterostructures, microwave photodiodes, microwave photonics

1. Introduction

The advancement of high-power photodiodes operating in the gigahertz frequency range has enabled the creation of fiber-based systems of long-haul transmission of analog microwave signals that provide the advantages of low signal loss, immunity to electromagnetic interference and light weight^[1–5]. Various designs of high-power photodiodes have been considered so far. Achieving optimal photodiode parameters requires optimization of various design key points, including charge carrier transit time, structure capacitance and conductivity, and heat removal, which frequently implies a compromise in parameters. Most of the designs of the high-power photodiodes described so far were based upon the p–i–n semiconductor structures. A Schottky barrier photodiode design employing a back-illumination scheme provides several advantages over the p–i–n-based structures, which include a lower electrical resistance of the photodiode leads and a larger thermal conductivity of two massive bulk leads as well as the possibility to use the optical reflection of the non-alloyed Schottky metal contact to increase the total absorption efficiency in the absorbing layer of the structure^[6]. We have recently demonstrated the Schottky barrier photodiodes in high-power operation^[7]. In this paper we describe the design, manufacturing and characterization of high-power Schottky barrier back-illuminated mesa structure photodiodes based on InAlAs/InGaAs heterostructures, and discuss the advantages of this type of microwave photodiodes for the 1.2–1.6 μm wavelength range. The operation of 10 and 15 μm diameter photodiodes in the frequency ranges of ≥40 and 28 GHz, respectively, the output power of up to 58 mW at 20 GHz, the responsivity of up to 1.08 A/W, and a photodiode dark current as low as 0.04 and 0.1 nA for 10 and 15 μm diameter diodes, respectively, were achieved. A study of the amplitude-to-phase (AM-PM) noise conversion characteristics of the manufactured photodiodes showed that the Schottky barrier photodiodes provide an advantage in the amplitude-to-phase conversion factor. This makes the Schottky barrier photodiodes a promising candidate for use in high-speed analog transmission lines with stringent requirements for the phase noise such as optoelectronic oscillators, analog optic transmission links and distributed antenna arrays.

2. Photodiode fabrication

The heterostructures for photodiode manufacturing were produced by molecular beam epitaxy using a Riber Compact 21T system. The growth was performed on substrates of semi-insulating InP (001) which provided low free-carrier light absorption for the back-illuminated photodiode design. One of the most important stages in the growth sequence was the substrate cleaning procedure prior to the layer growth. In order to initiate the growth on an atomically clean surface, the substrate was annealed at temperatures up to 540 °C in an arsenic flux with an equivalent beam pressure of 2.5 × 10^–5 Torr. The preparation of the substrate surface was monitored using a reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) system. The anneal was carried out until the appearance of surface reconstructions indicating that a clean surface has been reached. Fig. 1 displays RHEED images showing the creation of the (4 × 2) surface reconstruction which indicates the complete removal of residual oxides and the formation of a clean substrate surface suitable for the heterostructure growth. The details of surface transformations during the substrate preparation were discussed in Ref. [8].

Figure 1. (Color online) The (4 × 2) reconstruction of the clean surface of (001) InP after annealing seen in the RHEED images: (a) the

$\left[ {1\,\bar 1\,0} \right]$ azimuth, (b) the [

$1\,1\,0$ ] azimuth. The arrows indicate reflexes corresponding to the period by (a) 4 times and (b) 2 times greater than the crystal lattice period.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

The heterostructures used for the photodiode fabrication utilized a phosphorus-free InAlAs/InGaAs layer design which reduced the complexity of the growth procedure and system support in comparison with P-containing structures. The design of the heterostructure is given in Table 1 and the photodiode energy band diagram is shown schematically in Fig. 2. The structure consisted of a light absorbing layer which in turn comprised two parts, namely an undoped part and a thin n⁺-doped part, an n-side strongly doped contact layer below it, and a layer sequence used for the formation of the Schottky barrier grown above the absorbing layer. The thin n⁺-InGaAs absorbing layer and the graded bandgap InGaAlAs layer helped to eliminate the accumulation of charge carriers at the InAlAs/InGaAs heterointerfaces, which could lead to a significant increase of the carrier transfer time and, therefore, to a limitation of the photodiode bandwidth. The top protective InGaAs layer prevented the InAlAs surface from oxidation before the fabrication of the Schottky barrier. The InAlAs and InGaAs layers were grown at temperatures of 520 and 480 °C, respectively. The x_InAs contents in the layers were calibrated using the photoluminescence and optical absorption techniques prior to the growth of each heterostructure. The quality of the grown single layers and heterostructures was evaluated using the X-ray diffraction^[9], atomic force microscopy (AFM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A deviation of the x_InAs from the lattice-matched values of x_InAs = 0.53 for In_xGa_1–xAs and x_InAs = 0.52 for In_xAl_1–xAs alloys of not more than 0.2% was generally accepted throughout this study. The peak-to-peak roughness of the surface of the multilayer heterostructures, as observed by the AFM, did not exceed 0.8 nm which corresponded closely to the r.m.s. value of 0.113 nm that was obtained on single-layer samples previously^[9]. A SEM picture of a cleaved as-grown heterostructure shows distinct layer boundaries (Fig. 3) which confirms the achievement of the coherent two-dimensional growth mode required for the synthesis of high-quality heterostructures.

Table 1. InAlAs/InGaAs heteroepitaxial structure of the Schottky barrier high-power microwave photodiode.

Layer composition	Layer thickness	Layer description
In_0.53Ga_0.47As	30 nm	Protective layer
In_0.52Al_0.48As	30 nm	Barrier layer
InGaAlAs	50 nm	Graded bandgap layer
In_0.53Ga_0.47As	500–1200 nm	Undoped absorbing layer
In_0.53Ga_0.47As:Si	50 nm	Absorbing n⁺-layer (5 × 10¹⁸ cm⁻³)
In_0.52Al_0.48As:Si	300 nm	Contact n⁺-layer (5 × 10¹⁸ cm⁻³)
InP(001)	> 350 μm	Substrate

DownLoad: CSV | Show Table

Figure 2. (Color online) Energy band diagram of the InAlAs/InGaAs Schottky barrier photodiode under zero bias voltage. E_F is the Fermi level and Me is the Schottky barrier metal.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 3. (Color online) A SEM picture of a heterostructure sample with a total intended thickness of the absorbing layer of 650 nm. Layers of InGaAs appear brighter in intensity than InAlAs-based layers. The visible sets of different contrast layers are, from top to bottom: the InAlAs barrier and InGaAlAs graded bandgap layers together with the InGaAs protective layer; the InGaAs absorbing layer; the n⁺-InAlAs contact layer; the InP substrate. The green marks denote the layer thicknesses as seen by the SEM.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

The photodiodes were fabricated by forming mesa structures by a two-step chemical etching of the heterostructures in an H₃PO₄ : H₂O₂ : H₂O = 1 : 1 : 38 solution. The mesas with diameters ranging from 10 to 40 μm were manufactured. The ohmic contact to the n⁺-InAlAs layer was fabricated by depositing layers of Ge/Au/Ni/Au (20/40/20/200 nm) followed by an annealing at 385 °C in a hydrogen atmosphere. The Schottky barrier was formed by the deposition of Ti/Au (20/200 nm) on the InAlAs surface of the mesa structure. The use of a large bandgap InAlAs layer allowed one to increase the barrier height as compared to metal-InGaAs Schottky barrier structures. Prior to the barrier formation the InGaAs protective layer and native oxide of InGaAs protective layer were removed in succinic acid : peroxide = 5 : 1 and HCl : H₂O = 1 : 10 solutions, respectively. The mesa surface was passivated with an 800 nm SiO₂ layer synthesized by the low-pressure chemical vapor deposition technique at 250 °C. Contact leads of 4.5–5 μm thickness were formed by the electrochemical deposition of gold. The thick leads provided both a low electrical resistance and a high thermal conductivity to facilitate the heat removal from the diode. The mechanical strength of the structure was maintained by a polymer film. The substrate was thinned by mechanical grinding and chemical-mechanical polishing, after which an anti-reflection coating layer was deposited to minimize the light reflection. The wafer was then separated into individual back-illuminated diode chips. A photodiode chip is illustrated in Fig. 4.

Figure 4. (Color online) Optical reflection spectrum of a model heterostructure used to evaluate the Schottky contact reflection efficiency. The spectral resolution is set to average the interference fringes that develop in the spectral region hν < E_g. The diagrams illustrate the mechanisms of reflection for photon energies hν above the bandgap E_g of the InGaAs absorbing layer (left) and for hν < E_g (right). The inset at the top shows the photograph of a photodiode chip.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

3. Photodiode characterization

The DC parameters of the photodiodes were evaluated using an Agilent B1500A semiconductor device parameter analyzer, a Cascade M150 probe station, and a single mode fiber-coupled 1.55 μm laser used for responsivity measurements under continuous-wave illumination. A double diffraction grating spectrometer was employed to study the optical reflection spectra of Schottky barriers. Microwave characterization was performed using an experimental setup build around a distributed feedback laser diode with an erbium doped fiber amplifier, a 40-GHz bandwidth Mach-Zender electrooptic light intensity modulator, an Anritsu MS4645B vector network analyzer and an Anritsu MA24126A power meter. The photodiode chips were flip-chip mounted to carrier boards with 50 Ω grounded coplanar waveguide lines and end-launch K connectors.

The DC current–voltage dependencies of the diodes were typical of Au/Ti-InAlAs Schottky diodes and displayed a barrier height of 0.7 eV and an ideality factor of 1.2^[10]. The average values of the dark current taken at a 3 V bias on bunches of photodiodes of 20 pcs each amounted to 0.04, 0.1 and 0.3 nA for diode diameters of 10, 15 and 40 μm, respectively. The responsivity of the photodiodes depends on the absorbing layer thickness and is also influenced by the amount of incident light that had passed through the absorbing layer and is reflected backwards by the Schottky contact that acts as a mirror. In order to assess the amount of the contact reflection, we evaluated the reflection coefficient R_S of the Schottky contact. The R_S was determined from the spectrum of the reflection coefficient R(λ) of a specially prepared large-square sample that was not separated into diode mesas. The substrate of this sample was not thinned and had no antireflection coating. This resulted in the development of interference fringes in the spectral range below the InGaAs absorbing layer bandgap E_g = 0.74 eV due to the light reflections between the semiconductor–air interface and the Schottky metal mirror. The interference period in the spectrum was approximately equal to 1 nm. The R(λ) spectrum taken at 45° angle of incidence is shown in Fig. 4. The spectral resolution of the spectrometer was set so as to average the interference fringes during this measurement. The spectrum comprises two parts. At photon energies hν above the absorbing layer bandgap the reflection coefficient is determined mostly by the reflection at the substrate–air interface. In this case, the reflection is dominated by the component of light polarized perpendicularly to the plane of incidence and R(λ) reaches 38% for hν above 0.85 eV. At photon energies hν < E_g the reflection by the metallic mirror of the Schottky barrier sets in, resulting in an increase of the total reflection coefficient to 70%. In this spectral range the structure was modeled as a transparent slab of InP with a mirror on the surface opposite to the air contact, while the InGaAs/InP boundary was disregarded in the calculation. Modifying the relationship for the reflection coefficient of a similar layered structure^[11] and averaging the interference fringes in the spectrum, we infer for hν < E_g the reflection coefficient of the Schottky barrier of R_S = 65% with an estimated uncertainty of about ±5%. In the following we assume that the spectral dependence of the found R_S in the photon energy range close to E_g of the absorbing layer can be neglected.

The dependence of the photodiode responsivity at a 1.55 μm wavelength on the absorbing layer thickness is shown in Fig. 5. The photodiodes were illuminated from the substrate side using a cleaved fiber positioned opposite to the mesas. The measurement was performed on photodiodes with the largest mesa diameters in order to minimize the loss of light. The responsivity reached 1.08 A/W for an absorbing layer thickness of 1200 nm. The theoretical model values for the responsivity calculated according to Ref. [12] with the reflection of the Schottky barrier taken into account and assuming an absorption coefficient of α = 7050 cm^–1 (see Ref. [13]) and a negligible reflection at the coated chip surface (the solid curve) approximate the experimental data well.

Figure 5. (Color online) The dependence of the photodiode responsivity on the absorbing layer thickness at a wavelength of 1.55 μm. Squares display the experimental data and the solid line is a model calculation.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Although a larger thickness of the absorbing layer results in a larger responsivity of a photodiode, it also leads to an increase in the charge carrier transit time and therefore limits the photodiode bandwidth^[14]. For this reason the measurements of the photodiode frequency response were performed on photodiodes with the smaller thickness of the absorbing layer. Fig. 6 depicts the frequency responses of photodiodes with mesa diameters of 10 and 15 μm that have low capacitances and display the largest bandwidths. Here, the drops on the low-frequency side of the response curves are caused by the frequency responses of the high-pass bias circuits on the chip carrier boards. The ‘wavy’ behavior of the curves is induced by two unfavorable side effects: the incomplete matching of the impedances of the photodiode and transmission line, and non-ideality of the light intensity modulator calibration. It is seen from the figure that the frequency range of the 15 μm diameter photodiodes is limited to 28–30 GHz while that of the 10 μm photodiodes extends over 40 GHz. The limitation of the frequency range of the 15 μm photodiodes is attributed to the larger RC time constant value of the circuit (here R = 50 Ω being the load impedance) due to the larger diode capacitance. The largest output microwave power was achieved from photodiodes with the 15 μm diameter. Fig. 7 shows the dependencies of the microwave power output of a 15 μm photodiode on the input modulated optical power taken at a modulation frequency of 20 GHz for various applied bias voltages. The maximum output power, which caused thermal failure of the devices, reached as much as 58 mW at a bias voltage of 3 V. The output power value attained compares well with the data on the partially depleted absorber (PDA) and uni-traveling-carrier (UTC) photodiodes of comparable sizes in this frequency range (see e.g. Refs. [2, 15]).

Figure 6. (Color online) The frequency response of a 10 μm (solid line) and 15 μm (dashed line) diameter photodiodes.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 7. (Color online) RF output power of a 15 μm diameter photodiode as a function of the input optical power for bias voltages of 1, 2 and 3 V. Modulation frequency 20 GHz.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Another important characteristic of a high-power photodiode that can limit its application to microwave measurement and communication systems, phased antenna arrays and optoelectronic oscillators is the phase noise induced by the photodiode due to a variation of the output signal phase with a change in the input laser intensity. As a result of the dependence of the output signal phase on the input power level due to nonlinearities of the photodiode, the laser intensity noise is converted to an additional phase noise at its output^[16–18]. The amplitude to phase noise conversion can be characterized by the conversion coefficient K_PD = Δφ_PD / ΔP_opt [rad/W], where ΔP_opt is the input light power change and Δφ_PD is the output phase change. To evaluate the K_PD of the manufactured Schottky photodiodes, a dependence of the output signal phase versus the incident light power was measured at a modulation frequency of 20 GHz. The light power was recorded by taking the DC photocurrent of the photodiode. Fig. 8(a) depicts the fits to the phase change dependencies of a 15 μm diameter photodiode RF output measured for bias voltages from 1 to 3 V. It is seen from the figure that the output phase demonstrates a nonmonotonic behavior: an initial rise with the light power increased is followed by a decrease. The calculated absolute values of the K_PD coefficient obtained by the fitting of data of Fig. 8(a) are shown in Fig. 8(b). The K_PD obtained for the 3 V bias voltage which corresponded to the largest output power of the photodiode does not exceed 1.5 rad/W and exhibits a null at a photodiode DC current of 24 mA. The value of K_PD achieved can be compared with the published parameters of commercial photodiodes. According to Ref. [19], the K_PD of xHPLD series high-power photodiodes by Discovery Semiconductor, Inc. is limited to 5 rad/W. This comparison shows the advantage of the Schottky photodiode design, which makes these photodiodes suitable for use in high-speed analog fiber-optic transmission links with stringent requirements for phase noise.

Figure 8. (Color online) (a) Dependence of the phase of the output RF signal of a 15 μm diameter photodiode on the photodiode photocurrent for bias voltages of 1, 2 and 3 V. (b) Amplitude-to- phase conversion coefficient dependencies calculated from the data of (a).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

4. Conclusion

We described the design, manufacturing and characterization of high-power Schottky barrier InAlAs/InGaAs back-illuminated mesa structure photodiodes. These photodiodes of a 10 and 15 μm diameter operate in the frequency ranges of ≥40 and 28 GHz, respectively, and demonstrate the output RF power as high as 58 mW at a frequency of 20 GHz, the DC responsivity of up to 1.08 A/W, and a photodiode dark current as low as 0.04 nA. An AM-PM conversion coefficient of 1.5 rad/W has been measured, which makes the Schottky barrier photodiodes suitable for use in high-speed analog fiber-optic transmission links and optoelectronic oscillators with stringent requirements for phase noise.

Acknowledgements

The preparation and processing of heterostructures used in this work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant number 19-72-30023).

References

[1]	Liu P L, Williams K J, Frankel M Y, et al. Saturation characteristics of fast photodetectors. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 1999, 47, 1297 doi: 10.1109/22.775469
[2]	Li X W, Li N, Demiguel S, et al. A partially depleted absorber photodiode with graded doping injection regions. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett, 2004, 16, 2326 doi: 10.1109/LPT.2004.834563
[3]	Seeds A J, Williams K J. Microwave photonics. J Light Technol, 2006, 24, 4628 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2006.885787
[4]	Nagatsuma T, Ito H, Ishibashi T. High-power RF photodiodes and their applications. Laser Photonics Rev, 2009, 3, 123 doi: 10.1002/lpor.200810024
[5]	Rouvalis E, Baynes F N, Xie X J, et al. High-power and high-linearity photodetector modules for microwave photonic applications. J Light Technol, 2014, 32, 3810 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2014.2310252
[6]	Chizh A, Malyshev S, Mikitchuk K. High-speed high-power InAlAs/InGaAs/InP Schottky photodiode. 2015 International Topical Meeting on Microwave Photonics (MWP), 2015, 1
[7]	Chizh A L, Mikitchuk K B, Zhuravlev K S, et al. High-power high-speed Schottky photodiodes for analog fiber-optic microwave signal transmission lines. Tech Phys Lett, 2019, 45, 739 doi: 10.1134/S1063785019070204
[8]	Dmitriev D V, Kolosovsky D A, Gavrilova T A, et al. Transformation of the InP(001) surface upon annealing in an arsenic flux. Surf Sci, 2021, 710, 121861 doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2021.121861
[9]	Dmitriev D V, Valisheva N A, Gilinsky A M, et al. InAlAs/InGaAs/InP heterostructures for microwave photodiodes grown by molecular beam epitaxy. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng, 2019, 475, 012022 doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/475/1/012022
[10]	Aksenov M S, Valisheva N A, Chistokhin I B, et al. About the nature of the barrier inhomogeneities at Au/Ti/n-InAlAs(001) Schottky contacts. Appl Phys Lett, 2019, 114, 221602 doi: 10.1063/1.5091598
[11]	Born M, Wolf E. Principles of optics. 7th ed. Cambridge University Press, 1999, 64
[12]	Rogalski A. Infrared detectors. 2nd ed. CRC Press, 2010, 182
[13]	Zielinski E, Schweizer H, Streubel K, et al. Excitonic transitions and exciton damping processes in InGaAs/InP. J Appl Phys, 1986, 59, 2196 doi: 10.1063/1.336358
[14]	Kato K, Hata S, Kawano K, et al. Design of ultrawide-band, high-sensitivity p–i–n photodetectors. IEICE Trans Electron, 1993, E76-C, 214
[15]	Chtioui M, Enard A, Carpentier D, et al. High-power high-linearity uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes for analog photonic links. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett, 2008, 20, 202 doi: 10.1109/LPT.2007.913260
[16]	Rubiola E, Salik E, Yu N, et al. Flicker noise in high-speed p-i-n photodiodes. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 2006, 54, 816 doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2005.863062
[17]	Eliyahu D, Seidel D, Maleki L. RF amplitude and phase-noise reduction of an optical link and an opto-electronic oscillator. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 2008, 56, 449 doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2007.914640
[18]	Hu Y, Menyuk C R, Xie X J, et al. Computational study of amplitude-to-phase conversion in a modified unitraveling carrier photodetector. IEEE Photonics J, 2017, 9, 1 doi: 10.1109/JPHOT.2017.2682251
[19]	https://www.discoverysemi.com/Product_Pages/DSC-xHLPD.php

Fig. 1. (Color online) The (4 × 2) reconstruction of the clean surface of (001) InP after annealing seen in the RHEED images: (a) the

$\left[ {1\,\bar 1\,0} \right]$ azimuth, (b) the [

$1\,1\,0$ ] azimuth. The arrows indicate reflexes corresponding to the period by (a) 4 times and (b) 2 times greater than the crystal lattice period.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 2. (Color online) Energy band diagram of the InAlAs/InGaAs Schottky barrier photodiode under zero bias voltage. E_F is the Fermi level and Me is the Schottky barrier metal.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 3. (Color online) A SEM picture of a heterostructure sample with a total intended thickness of the absorbing layer of 650 nm. Layers of InGaAs appear brighter in intensity than InAlAs-based layers. The visible sets of different contrast layers are, from top to bottom: the InAlAs barrier and InGaAlAs graded bandgap layers together with the InGaAs protective layer; the InGaAs absorbing layer; the n⁺-InAlAs contact layer; the InP substrate. The green marks denote the layer thicknesses as seen by the SEM.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 4. (Color online) Optical reflection spectrum of a model heterostructure used to evaluate the Schottky contact reflection efficiency. The spectral resolution is set to average the interference fringes that develop in the spectral region hν < E_g. The diagrams illustrate the mechanisms of reflection for photon energies hν above the bandgap E_g of the InGaAs absorbing layer (left) and for hν < E_g (right). The inset at the top shows the photograph of a photodiode chip.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 5. (Color online) The dependence of the photodiode responsivity on the absorbing layer thickness at a wavelength of 1.55 μm. Squares display the experimental data and the solid line is a model calculation.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 6. (Color online) The frequency response of a 10 μm (solid line) and 15 μm (dashed line) diameter photodiodes.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 7. (Color online) RF output power of a 15 μm diameter photodiode as a function of the input optical power for bias voltages of 1, 2 and 3 V. Modulation frequency 20 GHz.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 8. (Color online) (a) Dependence of the phase of the output RF signal of a 15 μm diameter photodiode on the photodiode photocurrent for bias voltages of 1, 2 and 3 V. (b) Amplitude-to- phase conversion coefficient dependencies calculated from the data of (a).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Table 1. InAlAs/InGaAs heteroepitaxial structure of the Schottky barrier high-power microwave photodiode.

Layer composition	Layer thickness	Layer description
In_0.53Ga_0.47As	30 nm	Protective layer
In_0.52Al_0.48As	30 nm	Barrier layer
InGaAlAs	50 nm	Graded bandgap layer
In_0.53Ga_0.47As	500–1200 nm	Undoped absorbing layer
In_0.53Ga_0.47As:Si	50 nm	Absorbing n⁺-layer (5 × 10¹⁸ cm⁻³)
In_0.52Al_0.48As:Si	300 nm	Contact n⁺-layer (5 × 10¹⁸ cm⁻³)
InP(001)	> 350 μm	Substrate

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Liu P L, Williams K J, Frankel M Y, et al. Saturation characteristics of fast photodetectors. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 1999, 47, 1297 doi: 10.1109/22.775469
[2]	Li X W, Li N, Demiguel S, et al. A partially depleted absorber photodiode with graded doping injection regions. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett, 2004, 16, 2326 doi: 10.1109/LPT.2004.834563
[3]	Seeds A J, Williams K J. Microwave photonics. J Light Technol, 2006, 24, 4628 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2006.885787
[4]	Nagatsuma T, Ito H, Ishibashi T. High-power RF photodiodes and their applications. Laser Photonics Rev, 2009, 3, 123 doi: 10.1002/lpor.200810024
[5]	Rouvalis E, Baynes F N, Xie X J, et al. High-power and high-linearity photodetector modules for microwave photonic applications. J Light Technol, 2014, 32, 3810 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2014.2310252
[6]	Chizh A, Malyshev S, Mikitchuk K. High-speed high-power InAlAs/InGaAs/InP Schottky photodiode. 2015 International Topical Meeting on Microwave Photonics (MWP), 2015, 1
[7]	Chizh A L, Mikitchuk K B, Zhuravlev K S, et al. High-power high-speed Schottky photodiodes for analog fiber-optic microwave signal transmission lines. Tech Phys Lett, 2019, 45, 739 doi: 10.1134/S1063785019070204
[8]	Dmitriev D V, Kolosovsky D A, Gavrilova T A, et al. Transformation of the InP(001) surface upon annealing in an arsenic flux. Surf Sci, 2021, 710, 121861 doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2021.121861
[9]	Dmitriev D V, Valisheva N A, Gilinsky A M, et al. InAlAs/InGaAs/InP heterostructures for microwave photodiodes grown by molecular beam epitaxy. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng, 2019, 475, 012022 doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/475/1/012022
[10]	Aksenov M S, Valisheva N A, Chistokhin I B, et al. About the nature of the barrier inhomogeneities at Au/Ti/n-InAlAs(001) Schottky contacts. Appl Phys Lett, 2019, 114, 221602 doi: 10.1063/1.5091598
[11]	Born M, Wolf E. Principles of optics. 7th ed. Cambridge University Press, 1999, 64
[12]	Rogalski A. Infrared detectors. 2nd ed. CRC Press, 2010, 182
[13]	Zielinski E, Schweizer H, Streubel K, et al. Excitonic transitions and exciton damping processes in InGaAs/InP. J Appl Phys, 1986, 59, 2196 doi: 10.1063/1.336358
[14]	Kato K, Hata S, Kawano K, et al. Design of ultrawide-band, high-sensitivity p–i–n photodetectors. IEICE Trans Electron, 1993, E76-C, 214
[15]	Chtioui M, Enard A, Carpentier D, et al. High-power high-linearity uni-traveling-carrier photodiodes for analog photonic links. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett, 2008, 20, 202 doi: 10.1109/LPT.2007.913260
[16]	Rubiola E, Salik E, Yu N, et al. Flicker noise in high-speed p-i-n photodiodes. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 2006, 54, 816 doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2005.863062
[17]	Eliyahu D, Seidel D, Maleki L. RF amplitude and phase-noise reduction of an optical link and an opto-electronic oscillator. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 2008, 56, 449 doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2007.914640
[18]	Hu Y, Menyuk C R, Xie X J, et al. Computational study of amplitude-to-phase conversion in a modified unitraveling carrier photodetector. IEEE Photonics J, 2017, 9, 1 doi: 10.1109/JPHOT.2017.2682251
[19]	https://www.discoverysemi.com/Product_Pages/DSC-xHLPD.php

1	Orthogonally polarized RF optical single sideband generation with integrated ring resonators Mengxi Tan, Xingyuan Xu, Jiayang Wu, Thach G. Nguyen, Sai T. Chu, et al. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(4): 041305. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/4/041305
2	High-frequency characterization of high-speed modulators and photodetectors in a link with low-speed photonic sampling Mengke Wang, Shangjian Zhang, Zhao Liu, Xuyan Zhang, Yutong He, et al. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(4): 042303. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/4/042303
3	Precision photonic integration for future large-scale photonic integrated circuits Xiangfei Chen Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(5): 050301. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/5/050301
4	Recent advances in preparation,properties and device applications of two-dimensional h-BN and its vertical heterostructures Huihui Yang, Feng Gao, Mingjin Dai, Dechang Jia, Yu Zhou, et al. Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(3): 031004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/3/031004
5	Comment on Chen et al. "Fabrication and photovoltaic conversion enhancement of graphene/n-Si Schottky barrier solar cells by electrophoretic deposition", Electrochimica Acta, 2014 Lara Valentic, Nima E. Gorji Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(9): 094012. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/9/094012
6	Progress in complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor silicon photonics and optoelectronic integrated circuits Hongda Chen, Zan Zhang, Beiju Huang, Luhong Mao, Zanyun Zhang, et al. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(12): 121001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/121001
7	Unstrained InAlN/GaN heterostructures grown on sapphire substrates by MOCVD Bo Liu, Jiayun Yin, Yuanjie Lü, Shaobo Dun, Xiongwen Zhang, et al. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 113005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113005
8	Photoconductivity and surface chemical analysis of ZnO thin films deposited by solution-processing techniques for nano and microstructure fabrication V.K. Dwivedi, P. Srivastava, G. Vijaya Prakash Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(3): 033001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/3/033001
9	Impact of the lateral width of the gate recess on the DC and RF characteristics of InAlAs/InGaAs HEMTs Zhong Yinghui, Wang Xiantai, Su Yongbo, Cao Yuxiong, Jin Zhi, et al. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(5): 054007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/5/054007
10	S-band low noise amplifier using 1 μm InGaAs/InAlAs/InP pHEMT Z. Hamaizia, N. Sengouga, M. C. E. Yagoub, M. Missous Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(2): 025001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/2/025001
11	Design and optimization of evanescently coupled waveguide photodiodes Yao Chen, Cheng Yuanbing, Wu Jian, Xu Kun, Qiu Jifang, et al. Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(10): 104006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/10/104006
12	Influence of Ni Schottky contact thickness on two-dimensional electron-gas sheet carrier concentration of strained Al_0.3Ga_0.7N/GaN heterostructures Zhao Jianzhi, Lin Zhaojun, Lü Yuanjie, Corrigan Timothy D, Meng Lingguo, et al. Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(8): 084007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/8/084007
13	Structure optimization of a uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with introduction of a hydro-dynamic model Li Guoyu, Zhang Yejin, Li Xiaojian, Tian Lilin Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(10): 104005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/10/104005
14	High-temperature characteristics of Al_xGa_1–xN/GaN Schottky diodes Zhang Xiaoling, Li Fei, Lu Changzhi, Xie Xuesong, Li Ying, et al. Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(3): 034001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/3/034001
15	Optimized design of 4H-SiC floating junction power Schottky barrier diodes Pu Hongbin, Cao Lin, Chen Zhiming, Ren Jie Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(4): 044001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/4/044001
16	A capacitive membrane MEMS microwave power sensor in the X-band based on GaAs MMIC technology Su Shi, Liao Xiaoping Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(5): 054004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/5/054004
17	Analysis of PTCDA/ITO Surface and Interface Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy Ou Guping, Song Zhen, Gui Wenming, Zhang Fujia Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 229-234.
18	A New Method to Investigate InGaAsP Single-Photon AvalancheDiodes Using a Digital Sampling Oscilloscope Liu Wei, Yang Fuhua, Wu Meng Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(10): 1711-1716.
19	Low-Microwave Loss Coplanar Waveguides Fabricated on High-Resistivity Silicon Substrate Yang Hua, Zhu Hongliang, Xie Hongyun, Zhao Lingjuan, Zhou Fan, et al. Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(1): 1-4.
20	Photolithography Process Simulation for Integrated Circuitsand Microelectromechanical System Fabrication Zhou Zaifa, Huang Qing'an, Li Weihua Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(4): 705-711.

Search

GET CITATION

K S Zhuravlev, A L Chizh, K B Mikitchuk, A M Gilinsky, I B Chistokhin, N A Valisheva, D V Dmitriev, A I Toropov, M S Aksenov, High-power InAlAs/InGaAs Schottky barrier photodiodes for analog microwave signal transmission[J]. J. Semicond., 2022, 43(1): 012302. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/1/012302.

Export: BibTex EndNote

Article Metrics

Article views: 2679 Times PDF downloads: 86 Times Cited by: 0 Times

History

Received: 19 May 2021 Revised: 05 July 2021 Online: Accepted Manuscript: 07 September 2021Uncorrected proof: 08 September 2021Published: 04 January 2022

Article Navigation > Journal of Semiconductors > 2022 > 43(1): 012302

K. S. Zhuravlev, A. L. Chizh, K. B. Mikitchuk, A. M. Gilinsky, I. B. Chistokhin, N. A. Valisheva, D. V. Dmitriev, A. I. Toropov, M. S. Aksenov. High-power InAlAs/InGaAs Schottky barrier photodiodes for analog microwave signal transmission[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(1): 012302. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/1/012302 ****K S Zhuravlev, A L Chizh, K B Mikitchuk, A M Gilinsky, I B Chistokhin, N A Valisheva, D V Dmitriev, A I Toropov, M S Aksenov, High-power InAlAs/InGaAs Schottky barrier photodiodes for analog microwave signal transmission[J]. J. Semicond., 2022, 43(1): 012302. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/1/012302.

Citation:

PDF( 6648 KB)