J. Semicond. > 2023, Volume 44 > Issue 8 > 082001

ARTICLES

Pressure manipulation of ultrafast carrier dynamics in monolayer WS2

Yao Li1, Haiou Zhu1, 2 and Zongpeng Song2,

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Zongpeng Song, songzongpeng@sztu.edu.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/8/082001

PDF

Turn off MathJax

Abstract: Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have intriguing physic properties and offer an exciting platform to explore many features that are important for future devices. In this work, we synthesized monolayer WS2 as an example to study the optical response with hydrostatic pressure. The Raman results show a continuous tuning of the lattice vibrations that is induced by hydrostatic pressure. We further demonstrate an efficient pressure-induced change of the band structure and carrier dynamics via transient absorption measurements. We found that two time constants can be attributed to the capture process of two kinds of defect states, with the pressure increasing from 0.55 GPa to 2.91 GPa, both of capture processes were accelerated, and there is an inflection point within the pressure range of 1.56 GPa to 1.89 GPa. Our findings provide valuable information for the design of future optoelectronic devices.

Key words: two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenideshydrostatic pressurecarrier dynamicsband structureultrafast spectroscopy

Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have rich electrical, optical, chemical properties, and their bandwidth ranges from visible to infrared. Owing to the excellent mechanical, optical, and electrical properties, TMDs are suitable materials for sensors, catalysts, storage batteries, optoelectronic devices, and excitonic devices[14]. Monolayer WS2 is an atomically thin two-dimensional material, which is a sandwich structure, and is composed of a single layer transition metal tungsten (W) and two layers of chalcogen (S)[5, 6].

One key issue in harnessing novel properties of TMDs is to understand and control the carrier dynamic processes. Because the performance of TMDs-based photoelectric devices are closely related to the carrier dynamics process, effective and continuous tuning of carrier dynamics in TMDs is highly desired. Hydrostatic pressure is pure and clean because no additional impurities are introduced by the hydrostatic pressure of the diamond anvil cell (DAC). Recent reports have indicated that the optoelectronic properties of TMDs can be effectively tuned via hydrostatic pressure, such as the interaction of interlayer, material structure, carrier density, and conductivity[713]. The semiconductor to metallic phase transition in bulk WS2 is caused by hydrostatic pressure[14, 15]. In contrast, there are few studies on the carrier recombination of monolayer TMDs under pressure. Thus, it is of great value to develop an understanding of the carrier dynamics in TMDs with pressure.

Here, monolayer WS2 is used as a sample to study the carrier dynamics via transient absorption measurements. Our results demonstrate a pressure-induced blue shift of the A-exciton resonance, and two kinds of carrier capture processes of defect states can be continuously tuned by hydrostatic pressure. This study provides basic information for understanding the dynamics of carrier in TMDs, which may be useful in the design of new photoelectric devices that are based on TMDs.

The WS2 monolayers were grown by CVD technique at 800 °C for 20 min onto SiO2/Si, as shown in Fig. 1. Sulfur powder and tungsten trioxide powder with a purity of 99.9% were used as source materials for experimental preparation of samples. Meanwhile, 0.2-g sulfur powder was placed on the crucible in the first temperature zone, and 0.1-g tungsten trioxide powder was placed on the crucible in the second temperature zone. Furthermore, 40 sccm (cubic centimeters per minute) Ar and 5 sccm H2 was used as the carrier gas to transfer the evaporated sulfur vapor to the substrate. We raised the temperature of furnace 1 from 25 °C to 200 °C for 1 h, and the temperature of furnace 2 from 25 °C to 800 °C, and maintained the temperature for 20 min. The S powder is gasified in the low temperature area, transported to the high temperature area by the carrier gas, and reacts with the gasified WO3 on the substrate to generate WS2. The whole CVD equipment was then naturally cooled down to room temperature.

Fig. 1.  (Color online) Experimental setup of the CVD growth of monolayer WS2 sample.

The size of the sample prepared by CVD method can reach 40 μm, as shown in Fig. 2(a). The Raman spectra and photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the sample are shown in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d), respectively. The PL peak of the sample is centered at 615 nm. The Raman peaks of the sample is centered at 350 cm−1 and 418 cm−1, which represents the E2g1 and A1g peaks of WS2, respectively. The difference between the E2g1 and A1g peaks is 68 cm−1, which is in accord with the characteristics of single layer WS2[16]. The schematics of these two Raman modes E12g and A1g are shown in Fig. 2(b), the A1g mode of monolayer WS2 originates from the transverse out-of-plane relative vibration between sulfur atoms in the interlayer, while the E12g mode originates from the in-plane longitudinal vibration of tungsten and sulfur atoms in opposite directions. Therefore, E12g mode vibration is sensitive to the length of W−S bond. The PL peak of the monolayer WS2 lies at 615 nm (2.02 eV), which indicates that the valence band top and the conduction band bottom of the monolayer WS2 are located at the transition point, which is a direct bandgap[11]. The AFM image show that the thickness of our monolayer WS2 sample is 0.8 nm, which is shown in Fig. 2(e) and Fig. 2(f).

Fig. 2.  (Color online) The characterization of monolayer WS2. (a) Optical image of a monolayer WS2. (b) Schematics of Raman modes of E2g1 and A1g. (c) Raman spectra of monolayer WS2 sample. (d) PL spectra of monolayer WS2 sample. (e) AFM image of monolayer WS2 sample. (f) Height image intensity profile along the black line in (e).

The monolayer WS2 was peeled from the substrate with the PVP/PVA adsorption transfer method. The pressure device used in this experiment is a four-column DAC, and the size of diamond plane is 300 μm. The T301 gasket was pre-pressed to 50 μm, and a hole with a diameter of 100 μm was punched in the center with a laser. Silicone oil was chosen as a pressure transmission medium. The silicone oil, the monolayer WS2 sample, and a 10 μm ruby were placed in the hole. The DAC device was used to gradually increase the pressure of the monolayer WS2 heterostructure to 2.91 GPa from 0 GPa, and the direction in which the pressure applied is perpendicular to the plane of the monolayer WS2 sample.

Raman measurements were performed to study the lattice vibration of the monolayer WS2 sample when pressurized in the DAC[17] and the pressure transmission medium (PTM) is silicone oil. The evolutions of Raman spectra show a clear pressure-induced changeover, the feature at 350 cm−1 and 418 cm−1 (E12g and A1g modes of monolayer WS2) blue shift as the pressure increases (as shown in Fig. 3(a)), which is similar to other layered materials[18, 19]. The Raman peak as a function of pressure is shown in Fig. 3(b), and there are two linear increases at a rate of 3.1 cm−1GPa−1 (A1g) and 1.8 cm−1GPa−1 (E12g), respectively. The A1g modes are more sensitive to pressure than that of the E12g modes, which may be the reason why the out-of-plane motion of S−S bonds of A1g modes is more sensitive than the in-plane motion of the W−S bonds of the E12g modes under pressure. Therefore, the out-of-plane compression is more favorable than in plane compression under pressure[20, 21].

Fig. 3.  (Color online) Pressure-induced Raman vibration in monolayer WS2. (a) Evolution of the Raman spectrum with pressure for monolayer WS2 sample. (b) Raman vibrations of monolayer WS2 as a function of pressure.

The PL spectra of monolayer WS2 with different pressures were measured, as shown in Fig. 4(a). The PL peaks have a blue shift with an increase in pressure from 0 GPa to 2.91 GPa. The PL peaks as a function of pressure are shown in Fig. 4(b), and there is a linear increase at a rate of −2.1 nm−1GPa−1. The change of the bandgap can be attributed to the enhanced quantum confinement effect caused by the pressure.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) (a) Evolution of the PL spectra of monolayer WS2 sample with pressures. (b) PL peaks of monolayer WS2 as a function of pressure.

The transient absorption (TA) spectra of monolayer WS2 with different pressures were measured to gain more insight of the carrier dynamics process (as shown in Fig. 5(a)). For monolayer WS2, the applied pump wavelength is 400 nm and the pump peak fluence is 10 μJ/cm2. All of the samples were measured at room temperature.

Fig. 5.  (Color online) (a) Schematic of material structure and TA measurements of monolayer WS2 in the DAC. (b) Evolution of TA spectra of monolayer WS2 under pressure from 0.30 to 3.25 Gpa. (c) A exciton peaks as a function of pressures.

The absorption peaks of monolayered WS2 lies at 605−615 nm, which can be assigned to the A exciton resonance of WS2, and the photo-induced bleaching signals indicate that the corresponding energy states are occupied by photo-induced carriers. The TA spectra traces of A excitons are shown in Fig. 5(b) as the pressure ranged from 0.55 to 2.91 GPa at a time delay of 3 ps. A blue shift of the A exciton and the decrease of the intensity is observed with the increase of pressure. As shown in Fig. 5(c), the peaks of photo-induced signals with different pressures can be linearly fitted with a slope of −5.93 nm/GPa. These features might be caused by the pressure-induced enlargement of the bandgap of TMDs[2225].

The representative TA signals of A excitons with different pressures were recorded, as shown in Fig. 6. The decay curve can be well fitted as $ \Delta\mathrm{A}={\mathrm{A}}_{1}{\mathrm{e}}^{{-{\tau }}_{1}}+{\mathrm{A}}_{2}{\mathrm{e}}^{{-{\tau }}_{2}} $ with two time constants. Because the vacancies of atoms and grain boundary dislocations are common in TMDs, the capture process of shallow and deep defects states may give rise to the time constants τ1 and τ2[2628].

Fig. 6.  (Color online) The transient absorption signals of monolayer WS2 with different pressures: (a) 0.55 GPa; (b) 0.89 Gpa; (c) 1.22 Gpa; (d) 1.56 GPa; (e) 1.89 GPa; (f) 2.23 Gpa; (g) 2.56 Gpa; (h) 2.91 GPa. The red lines are fitting.

It should be noted that the carrier capture process gets faster when increasing the pressure from 0.55 to 2.91 GPa, and can be divided into two distinct regions according to the slope variation of time constants upon compression, as shown in Fig. 7. For 0.55 GPa < P < 1.56 GPa, τ1 changes with pressure at a rate of −1.12 ps/GPa and τ2 declines with pressure at a rate of −51.78 ps/GPa. When the pressure is above 1.89 GPa, τ1 shows a decline shift at a rate of −0.07 ps/GPa and that of τ2 decreases to −6.38 ps/GPa.

Fig. 7.  (Color online) The time constants (a) τ1 and (b) τ2 of A exciton as a function of pressure.

For monolayer TMDs, the time constants τ1 and τ2 can be assigned to the carrier trapping process of the shallow and deep defect state with different capture rates. Considering the reduced dielectric screening effect and strong quantum confinement effect of TMDs, the Auger type dynamic process can be realized at low carrier densities. The τ1 and τ2 may be caused by Auger type carrier capture process of defect states, which means the electrons or holes in exciton states are captured by defect states by transferring the excess energy to other electrons and holes to satisfy the energy conservation law[29, 30]. According to this model, the quantum confinement effect may be enhanced by increasing the pressure, and the carriers are much easier to collide with other carriers. This feature means that the carriers are easier to release the excess energy to other electrons or holes, and this is beneficial for the Auger type carrier trapping process[3133]. However, there is a different model that can explain the pressure-induced acceleration of the carrier capture process—the pressure can shorten the W−S bond in the monolayer WS2, and enhance the vibration between W and S atoms, which can increase phonon energy and be confirmed by the above Raman results. This feature is conducive to meet the requirements of energy and momentum conservation in the capturing process[20, 21].

At around 1.56−1.89 GPa, a turning point appears and changes the time constants of two decay process with the decrease of pressure, which may result from the pressure induced changeover of the electronic structure. Both of the transient components are fully recovered when the pressure is released. Thus, the results clearly demonstrate that the band structure and carrier dynamics processes of monolayer WS2 can be accurately manipulated by hydrostatic pressure.

In summary, we have synthesized a sample monolayer WS2 to study the optical response of the sample with pressure via Raman spectroscopy and transient absorption spectroscopy. We found that hydrostatic pressure can be an efficient method to tune the lattice vibrations. The transition spectra were analyzed by tracking the energy shift and carrier dynamics of A exciton with different pressures. The results demonstrate the efficient tuning of band structure and photo-induced carrier recombination processes by pressure engineering. Our findings provide the basic information for understanding carrier dynamics in atomically thin TMDs under external strain.

This work was supported by Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (JCYJ20220530153004010).



[1]
Sharma I, Mehta B R. Enhanced charge separation at 2D MoS2/ZnS heterojunction: KPFM based study of interface photovoltage. Appl Phys Lett, 2017, 110, 061602 doi: 10.1063/1.4975779
[2]
Ross R T, Nozik A J. Efficiency of hot-carrier solar energy converters. J Appl Phys, 1982, 53, 3813 doi: 10.1063/1.331124
[3]
Liu H S, Han N N, Zhao J J. Atomistic insight into the oxidation of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides: From structures to electronic properties. RSC Adv, 2015, 5, 17572 doi: 10.1039/C4RA17320A
[4]
Parzinger E, Miller B, Blaschke B, et al. Photocatalytic stability of single- and few-layer MoS2. ACS Nano, 2015, 9, 11302 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04979
[5]
Wang Q H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, et al. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Nanotechnol, 2012, 7, 699 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.193
[6]
Geim A K, Grigorieva I V. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature, 2013, 499, 419 doi: 10.1038/nature12385
[7]
Yin Z Y, Li H, Li H, et al. Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors. ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 74 doi: 10.1021/nn2024557
[8]
Choi W, Cho M Y, Konar A, et al. High-detectivity multilayer MoS2 phototransistors with spectral response from ultraviolet to infrared. Adv Mater, 2012, 24, 5832 doi: 10.1002/adma.201201909
[9]
He Y M, Yang Y, Zhang Z H, et al. Strain-induced electronic structure changes in stacked van der Waals heterostructures. Nano Lett, 2016, 16, 3314 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00932
[10]
Chen M, Xia J A, Zhou J D, et al. Ordered and atomically perfect fragmentation of layered transition metal dichalcogenides via mechanical instabilities. ACS Nano, 2017, 11, 9191 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b04158
[11]
Nayak A P, Yuan Z, Cao B X, et al. Pressure-modulated conductivity, carrier density, and mobility of multilayered tungsten disulfide. ACS Nano, 2015, 9, 9117 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03295
[12]
Zhu Z Y, Cheng Y C, Schwingenschlögl U. Giant spin-orbit-induced spin splitting in two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenide semiconductors. Phys Rev B, 2011, 84, 153402 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.153402
[13]
Ye Z L, Cao T, O’Brien K, et al. Probing excitonic dark states in single-layer tungsten disulphide. Nature, 2014, 513, 214 doi: 10.1038/nature13734
[14]
Selvi E, Ma Y Z, Aksoy R, et al. High pressure X-ray diffraction study of tungsten disulfide. J Phys Chem Solids, 2006, 67, 2183 doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.05.008
[15]
Hangyo M, Nakashima S I, Mitsuishi A. Raman spectroscopic studies of MX2-type layered compounds. Ferroelectrics, 1983, 52, 151 doi: 10.1080/00150198308208248
[16]
Ramakrishna Matte H S S, Gomathi A, Manna A, et al. MoS2 and WS2 analogues of graphene. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2010, 49, 4059 doi: 10.1002/anie.201000009
[17]
Duwal S, Yoo C S. Shear-induced isostructural phase transition and metallization of layered tungsten disulfide under nonhydrostatic compression. J Phys Chem C, 2016, 120, 5101 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10759
[18]
Livneh T, Sterer E. Resonant Raman scattering at exciton states tuned by pressure and temperature in 2H-MoS2. Phys Rev B, 2010, 81, 195209 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.195209
[19]
Nicolle J, Machon D, Poncharal P, et al. Pressure-mediated doping in graphene. Nano Lett, 2011, 11, 3564 doi: 10.1021/nl201243c
[20]
Cheng X R, Li Y Y, Shang J M, et al. Thickness-dependent phase transition and optical behavior of MoS2 films under high pressure. Nano Res, 2018, 11, 855 doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1696-y
[21]
Chi Z H, Zhao X M, Zhang H D, et al. Pressure-induced metallization of molybdenum disulfide. Phys Rev Lett, 2014, 113, 036802 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.036802
[22]
Nayak A P, Pandey T, Voiry D, et al. Pressure-dependent optical and vibrational properties of monolayer molybdenum disulfide. Nano Lett, 2015, 15, 346 doi: 10.1021/nl5036397
[23]
Dou X M, Ding K, Jiang D S, et al. Tuning and identification of interband transitions in monolayer and bilayer molybdenum disulfide using hydrostatic pressure. ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 7458 doi: 10.1021/nn502717d
[24]
Li F F, Yan Y L, Han B, et al. Pressure confinement effect in MoS2 monolayers. Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 9075 doi: 10.1039/C5NR00580A
[25]
Xia J, Yan J X, Wang Z H, et al. Strong coupling and pressure engineering in WSe2–MoSe2 heterobilayers. Nat Phys, 2020, 17, 92 doi: 10.1038/s41567-020-1005-7
[26]
Wang H N, Zhang C J, Rana F. Ultrafast dynamics of defect-assisted electron–hole recombination in monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett, 2015, 15, 339 doi: 10.1021/nl503636c
[27]
Cunningham P D, McCreary K M, Hanbicki A T, et al. Charge trapping and exciton dynamics in large-area CVD grown MoS2. J Phys Chem C, 2016, 120, 5819 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00647
[28]
Wang M S, Li W, Scarabelli L, et al. Plasmon-trion and plasmon-exciton resonance energy transfer from a single plasmonic nanoparticle to monolayer MoS2. Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 13947 doi: 10.1039/C7NR03909C
[29]
Ruppert C, Chernikov A, Hill H M, et al. The role of electronic and phononic excitation in the optical response of monolayer WS2 after ultrafast excitation. Nano Lett, 2017, 17, 644 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03513
[30]
Li Y Z, Shi J A, Mi Y, et al. Ultrafast carrier dynamics in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. J Mater Chem C, 2019, 7, 4304 doi: 10.1039/C8TC06343E
[31]
Ahn C, Lim H. Synthesis of monolayer 2D MoS2 quantum dots and nanomesh films by inorganic molecular chemical vapor deposition for quantum confinement effect control. Bull Korean Chem Soc, 2022, 43, 1184 doi: 10.1002/bkcs.12608
[32]
Sridevi R, Pravin J C, Babu A R, et al. Investigation of quantum confinement effects on molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) based transistor using ritz Galerkin finite element technique. Silicon, 2022, 14, 2157 doi: 10.1007/s12633-021-01010-w
[33]
Trovatello C, Katsch F, Li Q Y, et al. Disentangling many-body effects in the coherent optical response of 2D semiconductors. Nano Lett, 2022, 22, 5322 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01309
Fig. 1.  (Color online) Experimental setup of the CVD growth of monolayer WS2 sample.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) The characterization of monolayer WS2. (a) Optical image of a monolayer WS2. (b) Schematics of Raman modes of E2g1 and A1g. (c) Raman spectra of monolayer WS2 sample. (d) PL spectra of monolayer WS2 sample. (e) AFM image of monolayer WS2 sample. (f) Height image intensity profile along the black line in (e).

Fig. 3.  (Color online) Pressure-induced Raman vibration in monolayer WS2. (a) Evolution of the Raman spectrum with pressure for monolayer WS2 sample. (b) Raman vibrations of monolayer WS2 as a function of pressure.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) (a) Evolution of the PL spectra of monolayer WS2 sample with pressures. (b) PL peaks of monolayer WS2 as a function of pressure.

Fig. 5.  (Color online) (a) Schematic of material structure and TA measurements of monolayer WS2 in the DAC. (b) Evolution of TA spectra of monolayer WS2 under pressure from 0.30 to 3.25 Gpa. (c) A exciton peaks as a function of pressures.

Fig. 6.  (Color online) The transient absorption signals of monolayer WS2 with different pressures: (a) 0.55 GPa; (b) 0.89 Gpa; (c) 1.22 Gpa; (d) 1.56 GPa; (e) 1.89 GPa; (f) 2.23 Gpa; (g) 2.56 Gpa; (h) 2.91 GPa. The red lines are fitting.

Fig. 7.  (Color online) The time constants (a) τ1 and (b) τ2 of A exciton as a function of pressure.

[1]
Sharma I, Mehta B R. Enhanced charge separation at 2D MoS2/ZnS heterojunction: KPFM based study of interface photovoltage. Appl Phys Lett, 2017, 110, 061602 doi: 10.1063/1.4975779
[2]
Ross R T, Nozik A J. Efficiency of hot-carrier solar energy converters. J Appl Phys, 1982, 53, 3813 doi: 10.1063/1.331124
[3]
Liu H S, Han N N, Zhao J J. Atomistic insight into the oxidation of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides: From structures to electronic properties. RSC Adv, 2015, 5, 17572 doi: 10.1039/C4RA17320A
[4]
Parzinger E, Miller B, Blaschke B, et al. Photocatalytic stability of single- and few-layer MoS2. ACS Nano, 2015, 9, 11302 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04979
[5]
Wang Q H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, et al. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Nanotechnol, 2012, 7, 699 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.193
[6]
Geim A K, Grigorieva I V. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature, 2013, 499, 419 doi: 10.1038/nature12385
[7]
Yin Z Y, Li H, Li H, et al. Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors. ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 74 doi: 10.1021/nn2024557
[8]
Choi W, Cho M Y, Konar A, et al. High-detectivity multilayer MoS2 phototransistors with spectral response from ultraviolet to infrared. Adv Mater, 2012, 24, 5832 doi: 10.1002/adma.201201909
[9]
He Y M, Yang Y, Zhang Z H, et al. Strain-induced electronic structure changes in stacked van der Waals heterostructures. Nano Lett, 2016, 16, 3314 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00932
[10]
Chen M, Xia J A, Zhou J D, et al. Ordered and atomically perfect fragmentation of layered transition metal dichalcogenides via mechanical instabilities. ACS Nano, 2017, 11, 9191 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b04158
[11]
Nayak A P, Yuan Z, Cao B X, et al. Pressure-modulated conductivity, carrier density, and mobility of multilayered tungsten disulfide. ACS Nano, 2015, 9, 9117 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03295
[12]
Zhu Z Y, Cheng Y C, Schwingenschlögl U. Giant spin-orbit-induced spin splitting in two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenide semiconductors. Phys Rev B, 2011, 84, 153402 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.153402
[13]
Ye Z L, Cao T, O’Brien K, et al. Probing excitonic dark states in single-layer tungsten disulphide. Nature, 2014, 513, 214 doi: 10.1038/nature13734
[14]
Selvi E, Ma Y Z, Aksoy R, et al. High pressure X-ray diffraction study of tungsten disulfide. J Phys Chem Solids, 2006, 67, 2183 doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.05.008
[15]
Hangyo M, Nakashima S I, Mitsuishi A. Raman spectroscopic studies of MX2-type layered compounds. Ferroelectrics, 1983, 52, 151 doi: 10.1080/00150198308208248
[16]
Ramakrishna Matte H S S, Gomathi A, Manna A, et al. MoS2 and WS2 analogues of graphene. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2010, 49, 4059 doi: 10.1002/anie.201000009
[17]
Duwal S, Yoo C S. Shear-induced isostructural phase transition and metallization of layered tungsten disulfide under nonhydrostatic compression. J Phys Chem C, 2016, 120, 5101 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10759
[18]
Livneh T, Sterer E. Resonant Raman scattering at exciton states tuned by pressure and temperature in 2H-MoS2. Phys Rev B, 2010, 81, 195209 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.195209
[19]
Nicolle J, Machon D, Poncharal P, et al. Pressure-mediated doping in graphene. Nano Lett, 2011, 11, 3564 doi: 10.1021/nl201243c
[20]
Cheng X R, Li Y Y, Shang J M, et al. Thickness-dependent phase transition and optical behavior of MoS2 films under high pressure. Nano Res, 2018, 11, 855 doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1696-y
[21]
Chi Z H, Zhao X M, Zhang H D, et al. Pressure-induced metallization of molybdenum disulfide. Phys Rev Lett, 2014, 113, 036802 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.036802
[22]
Nayak A P, Pandey T, Voiry D, et al. Pressure-dependent optical and vibrational properties of monolayer molybdenum disulfide. Nano Lett, 2015, 15, 346 doi: 10.1021/nl5036397
[23]
Dou X M, Ding K, Jiang D S, et al. Tuning and identification of interband transitions in monolayer and bilayer molybdenum disulfide using hydrostatic pressure. ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 7458 doi: 10.1021/nn502717d
[24]
Li F F, Yan Y L, Han B, et al. Pressure confinement effect in MoS2 monolayers. Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 9075 doi: 10.1039/C5NR00580A
[25]
Xia J, Yan J X, Wang Z H, et al. Strong coupling and pressure engineering in WSe2–MoSe2 heterobilayers. Nat Phys, 2020, 17, 92 doi: 10.1038/s41567-020-1005-7
[26]
Wang H N, Zhang C J, Rana F. Ultrafast dynamics of defect-assisted electron–hole recombination in monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett, 2015, 15, 339 doi: 10.1021/nl503636c
[27]
Cunningham P D, McCreary K M, Hanbicki A T, et al. Charge trapping and exciton dynamics in large-area CVD grown MoS2. J Phys Chem C, 2016, 120, 5819 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00647
[28]
Wang M S, Li W, Scarabelli L, et al. Plasmon-trion and plasmon-exciton resonance energy transfer from a single plasmonic nanoparticle to monolayer MoS2. Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 13947 doi: 10.1039/C7NR03909C
[29]
Ruppert C, Chernikov A, Hill H M, et al. The role of electronic and phononic excitation in the optical response of monolayer WS2 after ultrafast excitation. Nano Lett, 2017, 17, 644 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03513
[30]
Li Y Z, Shi J A, Mi Y, et al. Ultrafast carrier dynamics in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. J Mater Chem C, 2019, 7, 4304 doi: 10.1039/C8TC06343E
[31]
Ahn C, Lim H. Synthesis of monolayer 2D MoS2 quantum dots and nanomesh films by inorganic molecular chemical vapor deposition for quantum confinement effect control. Bull Korean Chem Soc, 2022, 43, 1184 doi: 10.1002/bkcs.12608
[32]
Sridevi R, Pravin J C, Babu A R, et al. Investigation of quantum confinement effects on molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) based transistor using ritz Galerkin finite element technique. Silicon, 2022, 14, 2157 doi: 10.1007/s12633-021-01010-w
[33]
Trovatello C, Katsch F, Li Q Y, et al. Disentangling many-body effects in the coherent optical response of 2D semiconductors. Nano Lett, 2022, 22, 5322 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01309
1

Pressure-dependent electronic, optical, and mechanical properties of antiperovskite X3NP (X = Ca, Mg): A first-principles study

Chunbao Feng, Changhe Wu, Xin Luo, Tao Hu, Fanchuan Chen, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(10): 102101. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/10/102101

2

Spectroscopy and carrier dynamics of one-dimensional nanostructures

Yutong Zhang, Zhuoya Zhu, Shuai Zhang, Xianxin Wu, Wenna Du, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(12): 121201. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/12/121201

3

A compact two-dimensional analytical model of the electrical characteristics of a triple-material double-gate tunneling FET structure

C. Usha, P. Vimala

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(12): 122901. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/12/122901

4

Simulation and application of external quantum efficiency of solar cells based on spectroscopy

Guanlin Chen, Can Han, Lingling Yan, Yuelong Li, Ying Zhao, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(12): 122701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/12/122701

5

Electrical contacts to two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides

Shuxian Wang, Zhihao Yu, Xinran Wang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(12): 124001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/12/124001

6

245 GHz subharmonic receiver with on-chip antenna for gas spectroscopy application

Yanfei Mao, Shiju E, Klaus Schmalz, J. Christoph Scheytt

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(12): 125001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/12/125001

7

Recent advances in preparation,properties and device applications of two-dimensional h-BN and its vertical heterostructures

Huihui Yang, Feng Gao, Mingjin Dai, Dechang Jia, Yu Zhou, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(3): 031004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/3/031004

8

Layer-number dependent high-frequency vibration modes in few-layer transition metal dichalcogenides induced by interlayer couplings

Qing-Hai Tan, Xin Zhang, Xiang-Dong Luo, Jun Zhang, Ping-Heng Tan, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(3): 031006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/3/031006

9

Semiconductor steady state defect effective Fermi level and deep level transient spectroscopy depth profiling

Ken K. Chin, Zimeng Cheng

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(9): 092003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/9/092003

10

Electrical properties of Ge:Ga near the metal-insulator transition

M Errai, A El Kaaouachi, H El Idrissi

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(6): 062001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/6/062001

11

Giant magnetoresistance in a two-dimensional electron gas modulated by ferromagnetic and Schottky metal stripes

Lu Jianduo, Xu Bin

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(7): 074007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/7/074007

12

Structural, electronic, magnetic and optical properties of neodymium chalcogenides using LSDA+U method

A Shankar, D P Rai, Sandeep, R K Thapa

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(8): 082001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/8/082001

13

Chaotic dynamics dependence on doping density in weakly coupled GaAs/AlAs superlattices

Yang Gui, Li Yuanhong, Zhang Fengying, Li Yuqi

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(9): 092002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/9/092002

14

Correlated electron-hole transitions in wurtzite GaN quantum dots: the effects of strain and hydrostatic pressure

Zheng Dongmei, Wang Zongchi, Xiao Boqi

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(5): 052002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/5/052002

15

Structure optimization of a uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with introduction of a hydro-dynamic model

Li Guoyu, Zhang Yejin, Li Xiaojian, Tian Lilin

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(10): 104005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/10/104005

16

Influence of Ni Schottky contact thickness on two-dimensional electron-gas sheet carrier concentration of strained Al0.3Ga0.7N/GaN heterostructures

Zhao Jianzhi, Lin Zhaojun, Lü Yuanjie, Corrigan Timothy D, Meng Lingguo, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(8): 084007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/8/084007

17

Influence of optical phonons on the electronic mobility in a strained wurtzite AlN/GaN heterojunction under hydrostatic pressure

Zhou Xiaojuan, Ban Shiliang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 082001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/082001

18

Flow Characteristics of Fluids in a Microchannel Driven by Hydrostatic Pressure

Wu Changju, Jin Xiaojun, Jin Zhonghe, Wang Yuelin

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(5): 975-979.

19

Analysis of PTCDA/ITO Surface and Interface Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy

Tang Ning, Shen Bo, Wang Maojun, Yang Zhijian, Xu Ke, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 235-238.

20

Analysis of PTCDA/ITO Surface and Interface Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy

Ou Guping, Song Zhen, Gui Wenming, Zhang Fujia

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 229-234.

1. He, J., Zhao, R., Guo, Z. et al. A High-Performance Pressure Sensor Combining the Biomimetic Structures of Shark and Crocodile Skins. Advanced Functional Materials, 2025. doi:10.1002/adfm.202510130
2. Zheng, Y., Xu, H., Li, Z. et al. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Approaches in Semiconductor Research. Advanced Materials, 2025. doi:10.1002/adma.202504378
3. Hong, Y., Liu, Y., Li, R. et al. Emerging functions of two-dimensional materials in memristive neurons. Jphys Materials, 2024, 7(3): 032001. doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ad467b
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Yao Li, Haiou Zhu, Zongpeng Song. Pressure manipulation of ultrafast carrier dynamics in monolayer WS2[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(8): 082001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/8/082001
    Y Li, H O Zhu, Z P Song. Pressure manipulation of ultrafast carrier dynamics in monolayer WS2[J]. J. Semicond, 2023, 44(8): 082001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/8/082001
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 1013 Times PDF downloads: 63 Times Cited by: 3 Times

    History

    Received: 27 February 2023 Revised: 27 March 2023 Online: Accepted Manuscript: 25 May 2023Uncorrected proof: 28 June 2023Corrected proof: 14 July 2023Published: 10 August 2023

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Yao Li, Haiou Zhu, Zongpeng Song. Pressure manipulation of ultrafast carrier dynamics in monolayer WS2[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(8): 082001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/8/082001 ****Y Li, H O Zhu, Z P Song. Pressure manipulation of ultrafast carrier dynamics in monolayer WS2[J]. J. Semicond, 2023, 44(8): 082001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/8/082001
      Citation:
      Yao Li, Haiou Zhu, Zongpeng Song. Pressure manipulation of ultrafast carrier dynamics in monolayer WS2[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(8): 082001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/8/082001 ****
      Y Li, H O Zhu, Z P Song. Pressure manipulation of ultrafast carrier dynamics in monolayer WS2[J]. J. Semicond, 2023, 44(8): 082001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/8/082001

      Pressure manipulation of ultrafast carrier dynamics in monolayer WS2

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/8/082001
      More Information
      • Yao Li:is an M.S. student at the Shenzhen Technology University under the supervision of Prof. Haiou Zhu. His research focuses on the dynamic behavior of high-pressure carriers based on TMDs
      • Zongpeng Song is an optical testing engineer in the analysis and testing center of Shenzhen Technology University. He received his Ph.D. degree in optical engineering from Shenzhen University. His research focuses on ultrafast spectroscopy
      • Corresponding author: songzongpeng@sztu.edu.cn
      • Received Date: 2023-02-27
      • Revised Date: 2023-03-27
      • Available Online: 2023-05-25

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return