J. Semicond. >  Just Accepted

ARTICLES

Investigation of a gate-series-diode structure for improving schottky-type p-GaN gate reliability

Xuejing Sun1, Shenglei Zhao1, 2, , Yinhe Wu2, , Longyang Yu1, 2, Juan Gui1, Ga Zhang1, Xiufeng Song1, Shuzhen You2, Song Yang3, Hui Sun3, Bin Hu3, Huantao Duan3, Jin Rao3, Zhen Chen3, Yue Hao1 and Jincheng Zhang1, 2

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Shenglei Zhao, slzhao@xidian.edu.cn; Yinhe Wu, wuyinhe@xidian.edu.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/25100012CSTR: 32376.14.1674-4926.25100012

PDF

Turn off MathJax

Abstract: In this paper, a novel gate-series-diode structure for the Schottky-type p-GaN HEMTs is proposed, and the impact of the proposed structure on gate-source voltage oscillation is investigated when the device is turned on. The proposed structure is capable of effectively mitigating the gate-source voltage overshoot problem of GaN device, and has little effect on the switching characteristics. The gate voltage oscillations can be greatly stabilized at the steady-state turn-on voltage level when the turn-on voltage is 5 V. Compared with the conventional structure, the overshoots of the proposed structure reduce by 31.4%−71.4% and 40.6%−80.4% respectively under the two pulses, as drain-source voltage rises. The proposed structure is proved to be a potential method on improving gate reliability of the most GaN power devices.

Key words: p-GaN high-electron-mobility transistors (p-GaN HEMTs)schottky-type contactgate-series-diodegate reliability.



[1]
Chen K J, Häberlen O, Lidow A, et al. GaN-on-Si power technology: Devices and applications. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2017, 64(3): 779 doi: 10.1109/TED.2017.2657579
[2]
Jones E A, Wang F, Ozpineci B. Application-based review of GaN HFETs. 2014 IEEE Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications, 2014: 24
[3]
Yan Z H, Yuan S, Jiang X, et al. A novel AlGaN/GaN-based Schottky barrier diode with partial P-GaN cap layer and semicircular T-anode for temperature sensors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2023, 70(10): 5087 doi: 10.1109/TED.2023.3306736
[4]
Meneghesso G, Verzellesi G, Danesin F, et al. Reliability of GaN high-electron-mobility transistors: State of the art and perspectives. IEEE Trans Device Mater Reliab, 2008, 8(2): 332 doi: 10.1109/TDMR.2008.923743
[5]
Li B Y, Yang X, Wang K P, et al. A compact double-sided cooling 650V/30A GaN power module with low parasitic parameters. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 2022, 37(1): 426 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3092367
[6]
Liu X, Xu S R, Zhang T, et al. Demonstration of a GaN-based P-channel FinFET with high current density based on multi-channel structure. Appl Phys Lett, 2025, 126(20): 202103 doi: 10.1063/5.0258789
[7]
Wu N T, Luo L, Xing Z H, et al. Enhanced performance of low-leakage-current normally off p-GaN gate HEMTs using NH3 plasma pretreatment. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2023, 70(9): 4560 doi: 10.1109/TED.2023.3294894
[8]
Cheng Y, He J B, Xu H, et al. Gate reliability of Schottky-type p-GaN gate HEMTs under AC positive gate bias stress with a switching drain bias. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2022, 43(9): 1404 doi: 10.1109/LED.2022.3188555
[9]
Zhou F, Xu W Z, Jin Y L, et al. 3.0-V-threshold-voltage p-GaN HEMTs with low-loss reverse conduction capability. 2023 35th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD), 2023: 370
[10]
Wang H D, Gao H W, Chen X, et al. Enhanced gate reliability of ohmic-like p-GaN gate HEMT with a built-in reverse diode. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2024, 71(4): 2355 doi: 10.1109/TED.2024.3365454
[11]
Zhang L, Zheng Z Y, Yang S, et al. P-GaN gate HEMT with surface reinforcement for enhanced gate reliability. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2021, 42(1): 22 doi: 10.1109/LED.2020.3037186
[12]
Chao X, Tang C K, Tan J J, et al. Analysis of VTH degradation and recovery behaviors of p-GaN gate HEMTs under forward gate bias. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2023, 70(6): 2970 doi: 10.1109/TED.2023.3263819
[13]
Wang H, Yin Y L, Ji F W, et al. Enhanced gate breakdown and electroluminescence in p-GaN gate HEMTs under pulsed switching conditions. 2023 35th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD), 2023: 91
[14]
Qi Z Y, Pei Y Q, Wang L L, et al. A highly integrated PCB embedded GaN full-bridge module with ultralow parasitic inductance. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 2022, 37(4): 4161 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3128694
[15]
Wang K P, Wang L L, Yang X, et al. A multiloop method for minimization of parasitic inductance in GaN-based high-frequency DC–DC converter. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 2017, 32(6): 4728 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2597183
[16]
Kwan A M H, Chen K J. A gate overdrive protection technique for improved reliability in AlGaN/GaN enhancement-mode HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2013, 34(1): 30 doi: 10.1109/LED.2012.2224632
[17]
Zhou G N, Zeng F M, Gao R Y, et al. P-GaN gate HEMTs with 10.6 V maximum gate drive voltages by Mg doping engineering. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2022, 69(5): 2282 doi: 10.1109/TED.2022.3157569
[18]
Wang C C, Hua M Y, Chen J T, et al. E-mode p-n junction/AlGaN/GaN (PNJ) HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2020, 41(4): 545 doi: 10.1109/LED.2020.2977143
[19]
Liu C H, Chiu H C, Wang H C, et al. Improved gate reliability normally-off p-GaN/AlN/AlGaN/GaN HEMT with AlGaN cap-layer. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2021, 42(10): 1432 doi: 10.1109/LED.2021.3109054
[20]
Yang Q S, Wang L L, Qi Z Y, et al. Analysis of gate-source voltage spike generated by miller capacitance and common source inductance. 2021 IEEE 12th Energy Conversion Congress & Exposition - Asia (ECCE-Asia), 2021: 1293
[21]
Zhang W, Huang X C, Lee F C, et al. Gate drive design considerations for high voltage cascode GaN HEMT. 2014 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition-APEC 2014, 2014: 1484
[22]
Zhou F, Xu W Z, Ren F F, et al. 1.2 kV/25 a normally off P-N junction/AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with nanosecond switching characteristics and robust overvoltage capability. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 2022, 37(1): 26 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3095937
[23]
Gareau J, Hou R Y, Emadi A. Review of loss distribution, analysis, and measurement techniques for GaN HEMTs. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 2020, 35(7): 7405 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2954819
Fig. 1.  (Color online) The p-GaN gate stack structures of (a) ohmic contact and (b) Schottky contact.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) The proposed GaN gate-series-diode structure of (a) schematic diagram and (b) actual circuit diagram.

Fig. 3.  (Color online) (a) The DPT test schematic diagram of proposed gate-series-diode structure. (b) The gate-source voltage waveforms of conventional and proposed structure when the Vds is 20 V.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) The DPT test prototype of proposed gate-series-diode structure.

Fig. 5.  (Color online) The maximum oscillations of gate-source voltage under different Vds for devices without diode (conventional structure), and with diode (proposed structure) when turn-on voltage is 5 V at the (a) first pulse and (b) second pulse.

Fig. 6.  (Color online) Gate-source voltage unreliability problems caused by the common source parasitic inductance Ls when the device is turned on. Vgs-ideal and Vgs-real are the ideal and real gate-source voltages, respectively.

Fig. 7.  (Color online) The maximum oscillations of gate-source voltage under different Vds for devices without diode (conventional structure), and with diode (proposed structure) when turn-on voltage is 6 V at the (a) first pulse and (b) second pulse.

Fig. 8.  (Color online) (a) GaN device equivalent model. The gate loop equivalent model schematic diagram of the (b) conventional and (c) proposed structure.

Fig. 9.  (Color online) The TDDB gate leakage current curves of (a) conventional and (b) proposed structure.

Fig. 10.  (Color online) The turn-on time under different Vds for devices without diode (conventional structure), and with diode (proposed structure) when turn-on voltage is (a) 5 and (b) 6 V.

Fig. 11.  (Color online) The turn-off time under different Vds for devices without diode (conventional structure), and with diode (proposed structure) when turn-on voltage is (a) 5 and (b) 6 V.

Fig. 12.  (Color online) The turn-on loss under different Vds for devices without diode (conventional structure), and with diode (proposed structure) when turn-on voltage is (a) 5 and (b) 6 V.

Fig. 13.  (Color online) The turn-off loss under different Vds for devices without diode (conventional structure), and with diode (proposed structure) when turn-on voltage is (a) 5 and (b) 6 V.

Table 1.   The Vmax-gs and overshoot comparisons of conventional and proposed structures when turn-on voltage is 5 V.

PulseVds(V)202530354045
Under the
first pulse
Conventional
Structure
Vmax-gs (V)6.747.237.527.868.488.62
Overshoot34.8%44.6%50.4%57.2%69.6%72.4%
Proposed
Structure
Vmax-gs (V)5.175.065.065.065.065.05
Overshoot3.4%1.2%1.2%1.2%1.2%1%
Reduced Overshoot43.4%49.2%56%68.4%71.4%31.4%
Under the
second pulse
IS(A)1.642.192.633.33.78
Conventional
Structure
Vmax-gs (V)7.047.57.718.148.869.14
Overshoot40.8%50%54.2%62.8%77.2%82.8%
Proposed
Structure
Vmax-gs (V)5.015.185.385.355.45.12
Overshoot0.2%3.6%7.6%7%8%2.4%
Reduced Overshoot40.6%46.4%46.6%55.8%69.2%80.4%
DownLoad: CSV

Table 2.   The Vmax-gs and overshoot comparisons of conventional and proposed structures when turn-on voltage is 6 V.

PulseVds(V)202530354045
Under the
first pulse
Conventional
Structure
Vmax-gs (V)8.228.298.879.019.139
Overshoot37%38.2%47.8%50.2%52.2%50%
Proposed
Structure
Vmax-gs (V)6.276.566.827.017.687.82
Overshoot4.5%9.3%13.7%16.8%28%30.3%
Reduced Overshoot32.5%28.9%34.1%33.4%24.2%19.7%
Under the
second pulse
IS(A)1.642.192.633.33.78
Conventional
Structure
Vmax-gs (V)8.658.899.289.669.839.76
Overshoot44.2%48.2%54.7%61%63.8%62.7%
Proposed
Structure
Vmax-gs (V)6.46.887.367.547.988.08
Overshoot6.7%14.7%22.7%25.7%33%34.7%
Reduced Overshoot37.5%33.5%32%35.3%30.8%28%
DownLoad: CSV
[1]
Chen K J, Häberlen O, Lidow A, et al. GaN-on-Si power technology: Devices and applications. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2017, 64(3): 779 doi: 10.1109/TED.2017.2657579
[2]
Jones E A, Wang F, Ozpineci B. Application-based review of GaN HFETs. 2014 IEEE Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications, 2014: 24
[3]
Yan Z H, Yuan S, Jiang X, et al. A novel AlGaN/GaN-based Schottky barrier diode with partial P-GaN cap layer and semicircular T-anode for temperature sensors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2023, 70(10): 5087 doi: 10.1109/TED.2023.3306736
[4]
Meneghesso G, Verzellesi G, Danesin F, et al. Reliability of GaN high-electron-mobility transistors: State of the art and perspectives. IEEE Trans Device Mater Reliab, 2008, 8(2): 332 doi: 10.1109/TDMR.2008.923743
[5]
Li B Y, Yang X, Wang K P, et al. A compact double-sided cooling 650V/30A GaN power module with low parasitic parameters. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 2022, 37(1): 426 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3092367
[6]
Liu X, Xu S R, Zhang T, et al. Demonstration of a GaN-based P-channel FinFET with high current density based on multi-channel structure. Appl Phys Lett, 2025, 126(20): 202103 doi: 10.1063/5.0258789
[7]
Wu N T, Luo L, Xing Z H, et al. Enhanced performance of low-leakage-current normally off p-GaN gate HEMTs using NH3 plasma pretreatment. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2023, 70(9): 4560 doi: 10.1109/TED.2023.3294894
[8]
Cheng Y, He J B, Xu H, et al. Gate reliability of Schottky-type p-GaN gate HEMTs under AC positive gate bias stress with a switching drain bias. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2022, 43(9): 1404 doi: 10.1109/LED.2022.3188555
[9]
Zhou F, Xu W Z, Jin Y L, et al. 3.0-V-threshold-voltage p-GaN HEMTs with low-loss reverse conduction capability. 2023 35th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD), 2023: 370
[10]
Wang H D, Gao H W, Chen X, et al. Enhanced gate reliability of ohmic-like p-GaN gate HEMT with a built-in reverse diode. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2024, 71(4): 2355 doi: 10.1109/TED.2024.3365454
[11]
Zhang L, Zheng Z Y, Yang S, et al. P-GaN gate HEMT with surface reinforcement for enhanced gate reliability. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2021, 42(1): 22 doi: 10.1109/LED.2020.3037186
[12]
Chao X, Tang C K, Tan J J, et al. Analysis of VTH degradation and recovery behaviors of p-GaN gate HEMTs under forward gate bias. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2023, 70(6): 2970 doi: 10.1109/TED.2023.3263819
[13]
Wang H, Yin Y L, Ji F W, et al. Enhanced gate breakdown and electroluminescence in p-GaN gate HEMTs under pulsed switching conditions. 2023 35th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD), 2023: 91
[14]
Qi Z Y, Pei Y Q, Wang L L, et al. A highly integrated PCB embedded GaN full-bridge module with ultralow parasitic inductance. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 2022, 37(4): 4161 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3128694
[15]
Wang K P, Wang L L, Yang X, et al. A multiloop method for minimization of parasitic inductance in GaN-based high-frequency DC–DC converter. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 2017, 32(6): 4728 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2597183
[16]
Kwan A M H, Chen K J. A gate overdrive protection technique for improved reliability in AlGaN/GaN enhancement-mode HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2013, 34(1): 30 doi: 10.1109/LED.2012.2224632
[17]
Zhou G N, Zeng F M, Gao R Y, et al. P-GaN gate HEMTs with 10.6 V maximum gate drive voltages by Mg doping engineering. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2022, 69(5): 2282 doi: 10.1109/TED.2022.3157569
[18]
Wang C C, Hua M Y, Chen J T, et al. E-mode p-n junction/AlGaN/GaN (PNJ) HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2020, 41(4): 545 doi: 10.1109/LED.2020.2977143
[19]
Liu C H, Chiu H C, Wang H C, et al. Improved gate reliability normally-off p-GaN/AlN/AlGaN/GaN HEMT with AlGaN cap-layer. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2021, 42(10): 1432 doi: 10.1109/LED.2021.3109054
[20]
Yang Q S, Wang L L, Qi Z Y, et al. Analysis of gate-source voltage spike generated by miller capacitance and common source inductance. 2021 IEEE 12th Energy Conversion Congress & Exposition - Asia (ECCE-Asia), 2021: 1293
[21]
Zhang W, Huang X C, Lee F C, et al. Gate drive design considerations for high voltage cascode GaN HEMT. 2014 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition-APEC 2014, 2014: 1484
[22]
Zhou F, Xu W Z, Ren F F, et al. 1.2 kV/25 a normally off P-N junction/AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with nanosecond switching characteristics and robust overvoltage capability. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 2022, 37(1): 26 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3095937
[23]
Gareau J, Hou R Y, Emadi A. Review of loss distribution, analysis, and measurement techniques for GaN HEMTs. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 2020, 35(7): 7405 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2954819
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 14 Times PDF downloads: 2 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    History

    Received: 14 October 2025 Revised: 22 January 2026 Online: Accepted Manuscript: 28 February 2026

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Xuejing Sun, Shenglei Zhao, Yinhe Wu, Longyang Yu, Juan Gui, Ga Zhang, Xiufeng Song, Shuzhen You, Song Yang, Hui Sun, Bin Hu, Huantao Duan, Jin Rao, Zhen Chen, Yue Hao, Jincheng Zhang. Investigation of a gate-series-diode structure for improving schottky-type p-GaN gate reliability[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2026, In Press. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/25100012 ****X J Sun, S L Zhao, Y H Wu, L Y Yu, J Gui, G Zhang, X F Song, S Z You, S Yang, H Sun, B Hu, H T Duan, J Rao, Z Chen, Y Hao, and J C Zhang, Investigation of a gate-series-diode structure for improving schottky-type p-GaN gate reliability[J]. J. Semicond., 2026, accepted doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/25100012
      Citation:
      Xuejing Sun, Shenglei Zhao, Yinhe Wu, Longyang Yu, Juan Gui, Ga Zhang, Xiufeng Song, Shuzhen You, Song Yang, Hui Sun, Bin Hu, Huantao Duan, Jin Rao, Zhen Chen, Yue Hao, Jincheng Zhang. Investigation of a gate-series-diode structure for improving schottky-type p-GaN gate reliability[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2026, In Press. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/25100012 ****
      X J Sun, S L Zhao, Y H Wu, L Y Yu, J Gui, G Zhang, X F Song, S Z You, S Yang, H Sun, B Hu, H T Duan, J Rao, Z Chen, Y Hao, and J C Zhang, Investigation of a gate-series-diode structure for improving schottky-type p-GaN gate reliability[J]. J. Semicond., 2026, accepted doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/25100012

      Investigation of a gate-series-diode structure for improving schottky-type p-GaN gate reliability

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/25100012
      CSTR: 32376.14.1674-4926.25100012
      More Information
      • Xuejing Sun was born in Heilongjiang, China, in 2000. She received the B. S. degree in microelectronics science and engineering from the North University of China, in 2022. She is currently working toward the Ph. D. degree in electronic science and technology in Xidian University, Xi'an, China. Her research interests include packaging and reliability technology of power GaN devices
      • Shenglei Zhao received the Ph.D. degree from Xidian University, Xi'an, China, in 2015. He is currently a Professor at the School of Microelectronics, Xidian University. His research interests include lateral GaN HEMTs, vertical GaN power devices, and GaN device reliability
      • Yinhe Wu was born in Yuncheng, Shanxi, China, in 1991. He received the Ph.D. degree in engineering from Xidian University, Xi’an, China, in 2022. He is currently an Associate Professor with the Guangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University, Guangzhou, China. His research interests mainly focus on wide bandgap (WBG) semiconductor power devices and integrated circuit design
      • Corresponding author: slzhao@xidian.edu.cnwuyinhe@xidian.edu.cn
      • Received Date: 2025-10-14
      • Revised Date: 2026-01-22
      • Available Online: 2026-02-28

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return