Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2014, Volume 35 > Issue 11 > 116003

SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGY

Effect of three kinds of guanidinium salt on the properties of a novel low-abrasive alkaline slurry for barrier CMP

Guodong Chen, Yuling Liu and Xinhuan Niu

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Chen Guodong, Email:980294383@qq.com

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/116003

PDF

Abstract: The influence of three kinds of guanidinium salt on the removal rate selectivity of different materials was studied during the barrier chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process at first. The three kinds of guanidine saltguanidine hydrochloride, guanidine nitrate and guanidine carbonate. Then we compared the effect of the three kinds of guanidine salt on the dishing, erosion and surface roughness value. In the end, the reaction mechanism was studied through electrochemical analysis. All the results indicate that there is a better performance of the slurry with guanidine hydrochloride than the slurries with the other two kinds of guanidine salt. It effectively improved the removal rate selectivity and the surface roughness under the premise of low abrasive concentration and low polishing pressure, which is good for the optimization of the alkaline slurry for the barrier CMP process.

Key words: guanidiniumremoval rate selectivityelectrochemicalCMP

Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is an effective important material removal and surface planarization technology, which has been widely adopted to achieve global planarization of the copper interconnections during the dual-Damascus process[1-4]. As is known to all, a complete CMP process mainly includes three steps. A higher removal rate of Cu is required for the first step to efficiently eliminate the step height of the Cu films. Then a lower removal rate of Cu is necessary to precisely control the end-point over the barrier metals during the second step. In addition, in order to ensure that the Cu film on the barrier layer was removed completely, a period of time is also needed for the over-polishing step. The last step is the barrier layer and dielectric layer polishing[5].

However, there are two major issues. The first is the dishing of Cu lines and erosion of dielectric films during the over-polishing step. The dishing value is generally around 500 Å after the over-polishing. To reduce the dishing value, an appropriate removal rate selectivity of TaN:Cu and TEOS:Cu should be obtained, respectively[6]. If the polishing rate of the barrier and TEOS is faster than the polishing rate of Cu, a Cu line will protrude. On the contrary, if the polishing rate of Cu is too fast, the dishing value will become bigger after the barrier CMP. So only by the choice of an appropriate removal rate selectivity of different materials, will the dishing value decrease in the barrier CMP process and a good planarization can be achieved. The other is the high surface roughness. In order to control the surface roughness, the concentration of abrasive and polishing pressure must be reduced at the same time.

How to obtain an appropriate selectivity and reduce the surface roughness value in barrier polishing has become a focus of experts at home and abroad. Chiu[7] studied the effects of slurry pH and alkaline ions on the polishing behaviors of Cu, Ta and TEOS. He found that the ideal removal selectivity of Ta/Cu and TEOS/Cu can be achieved by adjusting the pH value of the slurry. Li[8] studied the effect of guanidine hydrochloride on removal rate selectivity and wafer topography modification in barrier CMP. He also received a good removal rate selectivity of Ta/Cu. In addition, a number of scientists studied the relevant reaction mechanism by the electrochemical analysis method, such as Chen, Janjama, and Rock[9-13]. In this paper, the influence of three kinds of guanidine salt on the removal rate selectivity of different materials was studied. It effectively improved the removal rate selectivity and reduced the dishing and surface roughness value under the premise of low abrasive concentration and low polishing pressure when adding a small amount of guanidine hydrochloride. Guanidine hydrochloride has a better performance than the other two kinds of guanidine salt.

Polishing experiments were performed on the E460 polishing system and the polishing pad was the IC1000, provided by Rohm Hass. The polishing pad was conditioned by using a grid abrade stainless steel conditioner with diamond pieces embedded into the surface. The correction time is 1 min before each polishing experiment. For the removal rate measurements, a 3 inch Cu piece, a 3 inch Ta piece and a 3 inch TEOS piece were used (the purity of the three kinds of materials was 99.99%). A 12 inch M1 pattern wafer was used to test the planarization ability of the different slurries. Table 1 shows the whole CMP process parameters, and Table 2 shows us the composition ratio of the three kinds of slurries.

Table  1.  The whole CMP process parameters
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table
Table  2.  The composition ratio of the slurries
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

The pH values of the three kinds of slurries were tested by the PHB-4 pH meter produced by INESA (precision is 0.01). Before each measurement, the pH meter was calibrated again with the special calibration fluid. The particle sizes of the slurries were tested by NiComp380 DLS. Before the test, the three kinds of slurries were continuously stirred for 30 s, then they were diluted 10 times with deionized water. In this paper, the mean diameter of the slurries was achieved by an intensity analysis technique, which is more accurate for measuring the small particle size.

The removal rate was calculated by Eq. (1) as follows:

RR=ΔmρπR2T,

(1)

where RR is the removal rate, Δm is the mass lost before and after polishing, R is the radius of the 3 inch piece (= 3.81 cm), ρ is the density of materials (ρCu = 8.9 g/cm3, ρTEOS = 2.3 g/cm3, ρTa = 16.6 g/cm3), and T is the polishing time. The mass losses of materials before and after polishing were measured by analytical balance (Mettle Toledo AB204-N). The cross-section view of the dishing pad (50 × 70 μm2) and the erosion pad (50 × 70 μm2) of the pattern wafer can be seen in Fig. 1. After the barrier polishing, the Xp-300 profiler was used to measure the dishing value and erosion value. The surface roughness of the pattern wafer was tested by an atomic force microscope (5600LS, produced by Agilent). The scanning area was (10 × 10 μm2).

Figure  1.  (a) The dishing measurement location and (b) erosion measurement location on the pattern wafer

All the electrochemical experiments were done by the CHI660C electrochemical workstation (produced by Shanghai Hua Chen Instruments). The corrosion current of Cu and Ta were analyzed in the three kinds of slurries, respectively. In order to complete the experiment, we made a Cu electrode (1 cm2 and a Ta electrode (1 cm2. Before each experiment, the Cu electrode and Ta electrode were ground for 1 min on sandpaper. Then the surface of the Cu electrode and Ta electrode were cleaned by anhydrous ethanol to remove the organic matter. In order to prevent an abrasive adhesive on the surface of the electrode, the electrochemical testing was performed without adding the SiO2 abrasive.

The pH value and particle size value of the three kinds of slurries are shown in Fig. 2. It is obvious that the pH of the slurry with guanidine nitrate is lower than other slurries, but there is not a big difference regarding the particle size. As shown in Fig. 3, we can find that the addition of guanidine hydrochloride is effective in improving the removal rate of TEOS and Ta, and the Cu removal rate will decrease slightly compared with the two other kinds of slurries at the same time. Therefore, the addition of guanidine hydrochloride can improve the removal rate selectivity (TEOS:Cu and Ta:Cu) more effectively than the two other kinds of guanidine salt. The removal rates of Cu, Ta and TEOS are 342, 365 and 872 Å/min, respectively. Due to the fact that the Ta removal rate and Cu removal rate is close to 1 : 1, the dishing value will not increase during Ta polishing. In addition, the TEOS removal rate and Cu removal rate is close to 2 : 1, the dishing value will be decreased during the TEOS polishing. Therefore, a small amount of guanidine salt can effectively modify the dishing value after the elaborate polishing (called p2) process.

Figure  2.  The pH value and particle size with the slurries
Figure  3.  The removal rate with the slurries.

As we can see in Figs. 4 and 5, guanidine hydrochloride is more effective in controlling the dishing and erosion values during the barrier CMP process than guanidine carbonate and guanidine nitrate. The dishing value and erosion value are 355 Å and 27 Å after the barrier CMP process, respectively; thus it meets the requirements of the 45 nm technology node. The decrease of the dishing value and erosion value is due to the fact that the addition of guanidine hydrochloride is effective in improving the removal rate of Ta and TEOS, and the Cu removal rate is reduced at the same time. Therefore, the dishing value and erosion value have been effectively improved and controlled in the polishing process of TEOS. The other important reason is that the working pressure is very low, just 1 psi during the pattern wafer polishing. In addition, a low concentration of abrasive is conducive to reducing the dishing and erosion values. So, a low working pressure and a low abrasive concentration are the future development trends for barrier polishing.

Figure  4.  (Color online) The pH value and particle size with the slurries
Figure  5.  (Color online) The pH value and particle size with the slurries

The root-mean square (RMS) value was used to evaluate the surface quality. Figure 6 shows the RMS values and surface topography photos of the pattern wafer after the barrier CMP. We can find that the surface topography is better after the barrier polishing with the slurry containing guanidine hydrochloride and the RMS value of the pattern wafer is only 1.12 nm. The surface roughness values of the pattern wafer polished by the slurry with guanidine carbonate and guanidine nitrate are 1.85 nm and 2.03 nm, respectively. So the addition of guanidine hydrochloride has a better performance on the roughness than the other two kinds of guanidine salt. This is because guanidine hydrochloride has lower corrosiveness on the Cu and Ta materials. In addition, the low erosion value is good for reducing the surface roughness.

Figure  6.  (Color online) The AFM picture of (a) slurry A (with guanidine hydrochloride, RSM 1.12 nm), (b) slurry B (with guanidine carbonate, RSM 2.03 nm) and (c) slurry C (with guanidine nitrate, RSM 4.20 nm)

From the Tafel plot, we can give an overview of the surface reaction of Cu and Ta. The corrosion current of Cu and Ta are presented in Figs. 7 and 8, respectively. We can conclude that for the slurry with guanidine hydrochloride, the corrosion currents of Cu and Ta are relatively large compared to the slurry containing guanidine carbonate and guanidine hydrochloride. So, it is clear that a certain thickness of the passivation layer formed on the surface of Cu and Ta, respectively. Because the passivation layer of Cu and Ta is thicker when the slurry containing guanidine hydrochloride is used, so the corrosion current is smaller than the other two slurries, and it is easy to get a better removal rate selectivity and planarization efficiency. The hole electrochemical reaction is very complex. The main chemical reactions occuring at the anode are as follows. Firstly, Cu and Ta are oxidized at the anode.

Figure  7.  (Color online) The Tafel plots of Cu
Figure  8.  (Color online) The Tafel plots of Ta

2Cu+H2OCu2O+2H++2e,

(2)

Cu2O+H2O2CuO+2H++2e,

(3)

Cu2O+3H2O2Cu(OH)2+2H++2e,

(4)

2Ta+5H2OTa2O5+10H++10e.

(5)

Then an oxygen reduction reaction occurs at the cathode.

O2+2H2O+4e4OH,

(6)

H2O2+2e2OH.

(7)

Finally, the guanidine salt and chelating agent are effective in complexing Cu +, Cu2+ and Ta2O5; however, the chemical reaction mechanism of metal ions and the guanidine salt is very complex, which is out of the scope of this paper, so it needs more investigative research.

In this paper, the influence of three kinds of guanidine salt on the performance of the alkaline barrier slurry has been compared on the basis of a low concentration of abrasive. The results reveal that the removal rate selectivity is effectively improved and the dishing value and surface roughness value are reduced by adding a small amount of guanidine salt. Also, it was found that the performance of guanidine hydrochloride is better than guanidine nitrate or guanidine carbonate. The biggest significance for this study is that the removal rate selectivity, planarization efficiency and surface roughness are improved under the condition of low abrasive concentration by adding a small amount of guanidine salt. The alkaline slurry can very well meet the requirements of the 45 nm technology node for barrier polishing.



[1]
Li J, Liu Y H, Wang T Q. Electrochemical investigation of copper passivation kinetics and its application to low-pressure CMP modeling. Appl Surf Sci, 2013, 265:764 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.106
[2]
Wang Chenwei, Liu Yuling, Niu Xinhuan. An advanced alkaline slurry for barrier chemical mechanical planarization on patterned wafers. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(4):046001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/4/046001
[3]
Chen Rui, Kang Jin, Liu Yuling. Study of a new weakly alkaline slurry for copper planarization at a reduced down pressure. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(2):026005 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/2/026005
[4]
Liao C L, Guo D, Wen S Z. Stress analysis of Cu/low-k interconnect structure during whole Cu-CMP process using finite element method. Microelectron Reliab, 2013, 53:767 doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2013.01.011
[5]
Wang C W, Gao J J, Tian J Y. Chemical mechanical planarization of barrier layers by using a weakly alkaline slurry. Microelectron Eng, 2013, 108:71 doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2013.04.001
[6]
Liu X Y, Liu Y L, Liang Y. Effect of slurry components on chemical mechanical polishing of copper at low down pressure and a chemical kinetics model. Thin Solid Films, 2011, 520:400 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.050
[7]
Chiu S Y, Wang Y L, Liu C P. High-selectivity damascene chemical mechanical polishing. Thin Solid Films, 2006, 498:60 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.07.063
[8]
Li Hailong, Kang Jin, Liu Yuling. Effect of guanidine hydrochloride on removal rate selectivity and wafer topography modification in barrier CMP. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(3):036002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/3/036002
[9]
Chen Y H, Tsai T H, Yen S C. Acetic acid and phosphoric acid adding to improve tantalum chemical mechanical polishing in hydrogen peroxide-based slurry. Microelectron Eng, 2010, 87:174 doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2009.07.009
[10]
Janjama S V S B, Peethalaa B C, Zheng J P. Electrochemical investigation of surface reactions for chemically promoted chemical mechanical polishing of TaN in tartaric acid solutions. Mater Chem Phys, 2010, 123:521 doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.05.008
[11]
Rock S E, Crain D J, Pettit C M. Surface-complex films of guanidine on tantalum nitride electrochemically characterized for applications in chemical mechanical planarization. Thin Solid Films, 2012, 520:2892 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.12.005
[12]
Rock S E, Craina D J, Zheng J P. Electrochemical investigation of the surface-modifying roles of guanidine carbonate in chemical mechanical planarization of tantalum. Mater Chem Phys, 2011, 129:1159 doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.05.079
[13]
Rock S E, Crain D J, Pettit C M. Surface-complex films of guanidine on tantalum nitride electrochemically characterized for applications in chemical mechanical planarization. Thin Solid Films, 2012, 520:2892 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.12.005
Fig. 1.  (a) The dishing measurement location and (b) erosion measurement location on the pattern wafer

Fig. 2.  The pH value and particle size with the slurries

Fig. 3.  The removal rate with the slurries.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) The pH value and particle size with the slurries

Fig. 5.  (Color online) The pH value and particle size with the slurries

Fig. 6.  (Color online) The AFM picture of (a) slurry A (with guanidine hydrochloride, RSM 1.12 nm), (b) slurry B (with guanidine carbonate, RSM 2.03 nm) and (c) slurry C (with guanidine nitrate, RSM 4.20 nm)

Fig. 7.  (Color online) The Tafel plots of Cu

Fig. 8.  (Color online) The Tafel plots of Ta

Table 1.   The whole CMP process parameters

Table 2.   The composition ratio of the slurries

[1]
Li J, Liu Y H, Wang T Q. Electrochemical investigation of copper passivation kinetics and its application to low-pressure CMP modeling. Appl Surf Sci, 2013, 265:764 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.106
[2]
Wang Chenwei, Liu Yuling, Niu Xinhuan. An advanced alkaline slurry for barrier chemical mechanical planarization on patterned wafers. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(4):046001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/4/046001
[3]
Chen Rui, Kang Jin, Liu Yuling. Study of a new weakly alkaline slurry for copper planarization at a reduced down pressure. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(2):026005 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/2/026005
[4]
Liao C L, Guo D, Wen S Z. Stress analysis of Cu/low-k interconnect structure during whole Cu-CMP process using finite element method. Microelectron Reliab, 2013, 53:767 doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2013.01.011
[5]
Wang C W, Gao J J, Tian J Y. Chemical mechanical planarization of barrier layers by using a weakly alkaline slurry. Microelectron Eng, 2013, 108:71 doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2013.04.001
[6]
Liu X Y, Liu Y L, Liang Y. Effect of slurry components on chemical mechanical polishing of copper at low down pressure and a chemical kinetics model. Thin Solid Films, 2011, 520:400 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.050
[7]
Chiu S Y, Wang Y L, Liu C P. High-selectivity damascene chemical mechanical polishing. Thin Solid Films, 2006, 498:60 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.07.063
[8]
Li Hailong, Kang Jin, Liu Yuling. Effect of guanidine hydrochloride on removal rate selectivity and wafer topography modification in barrier CMP. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(3):036002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/3/036002
[9]
Chen Y H, Tsai T H, Yen S C. Acetic acid and phosphoric acid adding to improve tantalum chemical mechanical polishing in hydrogen peroxide-based slurry. Microelectron Eng, 2010, 87:174 doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2009.07.009
[10]
Janjama S V S B, Peethalaa B C, Zheng J P. Electrochemical investigation of surface reactions for chemically promoted chemical mechanical polishing of TaN in tartaric acid solutions. Mater Chem Phys, 2010, 123:521 doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.05.008
[11]
Rock S E, Crain D J, Pettit C M. Surface-complex films of guanidine on tantalum nitride electrochemically characterized for applications in chemical mechanical planarization. Thin Solid Films, 2012, 520:2892 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.12.005
[12]
Rock S E, Craina D J, Zheng J P. Electrochemical investigation of the surface-modifying roles of guanidine carbonate in chemical mechanical planarization of tantalum. Mater Chem Phys, 2011, 129:1159 doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.05.079
[13]
Rock S E, Crain D J, Pettit C M. Surface-complex films of guanidine on tantalum nitride electrochemically characterized for applications in chemical mechanical planarization. Thin Solid Films, 2012, 520:2892 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.12.005
1

Effect of 1,2,4-triazole on galvanic corrosion between cobalt and copper in CMP based alkaline slurry

Lei Fu, Yuling Liu, Chenwei Wang, Linan Han

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(4): 046001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/4/046001

2

Hybrid functional microfibers for textile electronics and biosensors

Bichitra Nanda Sahoo, Byungwoo Choi, Jungmok Seo, Taeyoon Lee

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(1): 011009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/1/011009

3

The stability of a novel weakly alkaline slurry of copper interconnection CMP for GLSI

Caihong Yao, Chenwei Wang, Xinhuan Niu, Yan Wang, Shengjun Tian, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(2): 026002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/2/026002

4

ZnO1-xTex and ZnO1-xSx semiconductor alloys as competent materials for opto-electronic and solar cell applications:a comparative analysis

Utsa Das, Partha P. Pal

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(8): 082001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/8/082001

5

Investigation of aluminum gate CMP in a novel alkaline solution

Cuiyue Feng, Yuling Liu, Ming Sun, Wenqian Zhang, Jin Zhang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(1): 016002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/1/016002

6

Progress in complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor silicon photonics and optoelectronic integrated circuits

Hongda Chen, Zan Zhang, Beiju Huang, Luhong Mao, Zanyun Zhang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(12): 121001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/121001

7

Effect of guanidine hydrochloride on removal rate selectivity and wafer topography modification in barrier CMP

Hailong Li, Jin Kang, Yuling Liu, Chenwei Wang, Hong Liu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(3): 036002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/3/036002

8

Electrochemical investigation of copper chemical mechanical planarization in alkaline slurry without an inhibitor

Aochen Wang, Shengli Wang, Yuling Liu, Yan Li

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(2): 026003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/2/026003

9

The effects of electron irradiation on the optical properties of the organic semiconductor polypyrrole

J. V. Thombare, M. C. Rath, S. H. Han, V. J. Fulari

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(9): 093001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/9/093001

10

AC-electronic and dielectric properties of semiconducting phthalocyanine compounds:a comparative study

Safa'a M. Hraibat, Rushdi M-L. Kitaneh, Mohammad M. Abu-Samreh, Abdelkarim M. Saleh

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(11): 112001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/11/112001

11

Dielectric response and electric properties of organic semiconducting phthalocyanine thin films

A. M. Saleh, S. M. Hraibat, R. M-L. Kitaneh, M. M. Abu-Samreh, S. M. Musameh, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(8): 082002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/8/082002

12

Electrical characterization of the organic semiconductor Ag/CuPc/Au Schottky diode

Mutabar Shah, M. H. Sayyad, Kh. S. Karimov

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(4): 044001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/4/044001

13

Optical and electrical properties of electrochemically deposited polyaniline-CeO2 hybrid nanocomposite film

Anees A. Ansari, M. A. M. Khan, M. Naziruddin Khan, Salman A. Alrokayan, M. Alhoshan, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(4): 043001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/4/043001

14

Modeling and experimental research on a removal mechanism during chemical mechanical polishing at the molecular scale

An Wei, Zhao Yongwu, Wang Yongguang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(11): 116005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/11/116005

15

Effects of the reciprocating parameters of the carrier on material removal rate and non-uniformity in CMP

Wang Cailing, Kang Renke, Jin Zhuji, Guo Dongming

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(12): 126001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/12/126001

16

A new cleaning process combining non-ionic surfactant with diamond film electrochemical oxidation for polished silicon wafers

Gao Baohong, Zhu Yadong, Liu Yuling, Wang Shengli, Zhou Qiang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(7): 076002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/7/076002

17

A signal processing method for the friction-based endpoint detection system of a CMP process

Xu Chi, Guo Dongming, Jin Zhuji, Kang Renke

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(12): 126002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/12/126002

18

Analysis of Factors Affecting CMP Removal Rate of Lithium Niobate

Tan Baimei, Niu Xinhuan, Han Lili, Liu Yuling, Cui Chunxiang, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(S1): 574-578.

19

CMP and Electrochemical Characterization of Ge2Sb2Te5 Filmin Polishing Slurry

Liu Qibin, Zhang Kailiang, Wang Liangyong, Song Zhitang, Feng Songlin, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(S1): 161-164.

20

Electronic Structure of Semiconductor Nanocrystals

Li Jingbo, Wang Linwang, Wei Suhuai

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 191-196.

  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Guodong Chen, Yuling Liu, Xinhuan Niu. Effect of three kinds of guanidinium salt on the properties of a novel low-abrasive alkaline slurry for barrier CMP[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 116003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/116003
    G D Chen, Y L Liu, X H Niu. Effect of three kinds of guanidinium salt on the properties of a novel low-abrasive alkaline slurry for barrier CMP[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(11): 116003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/116003.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 2655 Times PDF downloads: 16 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    History

    Received: 04 April 2014 Revised: 16 June 2014 Online: Published: 01 November 2014

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Guodong Chen, Yuling Liu, Xinhuan Niu. Effect of three kinds of guanidinium salt on the properties of a novel low-abrasive alkaline slurry for barrier CMP[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 116003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/116003 ****G D Chen, Y L Liu, X H Niu. Effect of three kinds of guanidinium salt on the properties of a novel low-abrasive alkaline slurry for barrier CMP[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(11): 116003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/116003.
      Citation:
      Guodong Chen, Yuling Liu, Xinhuan Niu. Effect of three kinds of guanidinium salt on the properties of a novel low-abrasive alkaline slurry for barrier CMP[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 116003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/116003 ****
      G D Chen, Y L Liu, X H Niu. Effect of three kinds of guanidinium salt on the properties of a novel low-abrasive alkaline slurry for barrier CMP[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(11): 116003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/116003.

      Effect of three kinds of guanidinium salt on the properties of a novel low-abrasive alkaline slurry for barrier CMP

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/116003
      Funds:

      the Hebei Natural Science Foundation of China E2013202247

      Project supported by the Special Project Items NO. 2 in National Long-Term Technology Development Plan, China (No. 2009ZX02308) and the Hebei Natural Science Foundation of China (E2013202247)

      the Special Project Items NO. 2 in National Long-Term Technology Development Plan, China 2009ZX02308

      More Information
      • Corresponding author: Chen Guodong, Email:980294383@qq.com
      • Received Date: 2014-04-04
      • Revised Date: 2014-06-16
      • Published Date: 2014-11-01

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return