Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2016, Volume 37 > Issue 7 > 074001

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES

Modeling and simulation of carbon nanotube field effect transistor and its circuit application

Amandeep Singh, Dinesh Kumar Saini, Dinesh Agarwal, Sajal Aggarwal, Mamta Khosla and Balwinder Raj

PDF

Abstract: The carbon nanotube field effect transistor (CNTFET) is modelled for circuit application. The model is based on the transport mechanism and it directly relates the transport mechanism with the chirality. Also, it does not consider self consistent equations and thus is used to develop the HSPICE compatible circuit model. For validation of the model, it is applied to the top gate CNTFET structure and the MATLAB simulation results are compared with the simulations of a similar structure created in NanoTCAD ViDES. For demonstrating the circuit compatibility of the model, two circuits viz. inverter and SRAM are designed and simulated in HSPICE. Finally, SRAM performance metrics are compared with those of device simulations from NanoTCAD ViDES.

Key words: carbon nanotubeCNTFETSRAMHSPICENanoTCAD ViDES

As the scaling of planer complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology enters the sub-10 nm era,the silicon based industry is facing many problems such as short channel effects. It will reach its fundamental scaling limits by 2018 as per the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) roadmap[1]. Various nanoscale devices have gained attention in recent years as a replacement of CMOS technology in the sub-10 nm era. The carbon nanotube field effect transistor (CNTFET) is one of the promising devices among them. The carbon nanotube (CNT) exhibits ideal electronic and mechanical properties. CNT diameters can be up to 1 nm small and a near ballistic transport mechanism can be assumed for small channel length (~ 200 nm)[2]. CNTFET seems a very attractive solution to the silicon based industry due to the similar device structure of the conventional Metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET),hence the CMOS device infrastructure can be reused[3]. That is why both p-type and n-type CNTFETs have been successfully fabricated recently[4, 5, 6].

A great deal of work is going on the modelling and simulation of CNTFET,but the device physics and transport mechanism of CNTFET are yet to be explored. There are two main approaches towards modelling: the non equilibrium Green function (NEGF) approach[7] and the ballistic transport mechanism approach[8]. The NEGF approach consists of self consistent equations which need complex calculations and hence are very time consuming. The problem with this approach is that it cannot be used for circuit simulations. The second ballistic transport mechanism approach is simple for modelling the I-V and C-V characteristics. The model used is based on the latter approach. In this approach,modelling is based on the principle of calculation of the CNT charge,which is responsible for the transport mechanism. The CNT potential is responsible for the charge developed on the CNT surface and that charge is responsible for current flow. Also CNT surface potential will alter the band of the channel.

The model directly relates the transport mechanism with chirality. Our model is valid for zigzag (n,0) CNTs for variable diameters and channel lengths. The model is valid as long as the CNT behaves as semiconducting. Necessary approximations are made for the calculations. The beauty of the model is it can be used in any conventional circuit simulator like HSPICE as it denies self consistent equations. The model is simulated in MATLAB for I-V characteristics. The simulations are compared with that of NanoTCAD ViDES[7] for the same device parameters and are found to be in the same trend. For circuit simulations,the model is converted to HSPICE model file using Verilog-A and look up tables are formed with that of NanoTCAD ViDES simulations data. Lastly,circuit simulations are done for the inverter and SRAM.

Due to one dimensional band structure of CNTFET,the transport inside CNTs can be assumed to be near ballistic. For ballistic transport the current is independent of the CNT length for wide ranges[9]. The reported mean free path for CNT is ~ 200 nm[10]. Hence channel length is not a dominant factor for current calculations. The dominant factor is chirality or in other words diameter,as it directly affects the bandgap,threshold voltage and carrier concentration. Another important factor that affects current calculations is oxide capacitance,which consists of oxide thickness and its dielectric constant value. The charge base model used in this work is shown in Figure 1[8]. There will be induced potential developed across the CNT and oxide interface due to the action of applied gate voltage. It shows the effect of CNT surface potential (ψcnt) on the band diagram of the channel. The band will get shifted by an amount of ψcnt in the downward direction on applying positive gate bias and vice versa. In CNTFET,the ON current ((ION) is limited by the amount of charge induced on the channel by gate voltage,but not on doping of CNT at source and drain sides. However,the OFF current (IOFF) is affected by doping as tunnelling depends on the band profile of source and drain.

Figure  .  Band shift with gate bias at high drain bias[8].

The model is developed and applied to the top gate structure of CNTFET as shown in Figure 2. The device is of the conventional type as doping is introduced at source and drain sides. The back gate (body) is at zero bias and all the potentials are taken with respect to the body (substrate). The role of doping is shifting of the Fermi level of the source and drain sides,as a result of which conduction takes place. The doping value used is 5 × 103 as a molar fraction,which is defined as the ratio between the number of doping atoms over the number of atoms[11].

Figure  .  Top gated CNTFET structure.

The CNT is defined by the chiral numbers (n,m) which are responsible for its properties. The basic parameters like diameter (d) and bandgap ( $E_{\rm g}$ ) are calculated with the help of (n,m). The first and most important step is to calculate d of the nanotube,which is given by[12]:

$ d=\frac{\sqrt 3 a}{\pi }\sqrt {n^{2} + m^{2}+2 nm}, $

(1)

where a is the inter-atomic distance between carbon atoms and its value is 0.142 nm[12]. The next important step is the conduction band minima calculation,which can be done using the bandgap. Conduction band minima for the CNT are the base for all the calculations as the limit for integrations. It can be defined that the conduction band minima for the first subband can be set to half of the bandgap at no gate bias. The value of bandgap is dependent on diameter and given as[13]:

$ {{E}_{\text{g}}}=\frac{2a{{V}_{\text{pp}\pi }}}{\sqrt{3}d}, $

(2)

where $V_{\rm pp\uppi }$ is the carbon π-π bond energy and its value is 3.033 eV[12]. The transport mechanism is directly dependent on the intrinsic charge carrier concentration ( $n_{\rm CNT}$ ) of the nanotube which can be written as[14]:

$ n_{\rm cnt} =\int^\infty_{E_{\rm C}}{D\left(E\right)f\left(E\right){\rm d}E}, $

(3)

where D(E) is density of states and f(E) is Fermi-Dirac distribution. The values of D(E) and f(E) are given by Equations (4) and (5) as:

$ f\left(E \right)=\frac{1}{1+{\rm exp} \frac{E-E_{\rm F}}{kT}}, $

(4)

where k is the Boltzmann constant,T is the operating temperature and EF is the Fermi level of the CNT.

$ D\left( E \right)\text{d}E=2\sum\nolimits_{1}^{\text{All}\text{bands}}{\frac{4}{\pi {{V}_{\text{p}{{\text{p}}_{\pi }}}}a\sqrt{3}}\frac{E}{\sqrt{{{E}^{2}}-{{E}_{\text{C}}}}}\text{d}E}, $

(5)

where $E_{\rm C}$ is the conduction band energy. The density of states is calculated for the first subband only as the contribution of next level subbands is negligible. Combining Equations (4) and (5),we can rewrite Equation (3) as:

$ {{n}_{\text{cnt}}}={{N}_{\text{c}}}I\text{exp}\left( \frac{-{{E}_{\text{c}}}}{kT} \right), $

(6)

where

$ {{N}_{\text{c}}}=\frac{8kT}{\pi {{V}_{\text{p}{{\text{p}}_{\pi }}}}a\sqrt{3}}, $

(7)

$ I=\frac{1}{\sqrt {kT}}\int_0^\frac{6E_{\rm C}}{T} {\frac{\left( kTx+E_{\rm C} \right)}{\sqrt {x\left( kTx+2E_{\rm C} \right)} }{\rm exp}\left(-x \right){\rm d}x}. $

(8)

The analytical calculation for I is given in Reference [15]. The source and drain side Fermi levels are at zero for intrinsic CNT. By introducing doping,the CNT can be n-type or p-type and it directly affects the nature of CNTFET and its current value. If $\upDelta E_{\rm F}$ is the shift in Fermi level due to doping then the value of $\upDelta E_{\rm F}$ is given as[14]:

$ \Delta {E_{\rm{F}}} = kT{\rm{ln}}\left( {1 + \frac{N}{{{n_{{\rm{cnt}},{\rm{i}}}}}}} \right), $

(9)

where N is the doping concentration. The value of $\upDelta E_{\rm F}$ is positive for n-type and negative for p-type doping. Let $V_{\rm SS}$ and $V_{\rm DS}$ be the source to substrate and drain to substrate bias respectively then the drain current $I_{\rm DS}$ can be calculated using the Launder Equation [16] as:

$ IDS=qkTπh{ln[1+eΔEF+q(Ψcnt(0)VSSϕ0)ECKT]ln[1+eΔEF+q(Ψcnt(L)VDSϕ0)ECKT]},

$

(10)

where q is the electronic charge and h is Planck's constant. $\Psi_{\rm cnt}$ and $\phi_{0}$ are the CNT surface potential due to the front gate and back gate (substrate) respectively. For the top gate device structure, $\phi_{0}$ is set to zero. The value of $\Psi_{\rm cnt}$ is different at the source and drain and can be calculated as[15]:

$ \Psi_{\rm cnt} (0) = V_{\rm GS}-V_{\rm fb}, $

(11)

$ Ψcnt(L)=VGSδIe1Vfb+δm(Vcb+ϕ0+EcΔEFKTq)1+δm,

$

(12)

where $V_{\rm GS}$ is the gate to body bias, $V_{\rm cb}$ is the induced potential between the carbon nanotube and the substrate due to the drain and source terminal voltages and $V_{\rm fb}$ is flat band voltage. Since the calculations of $I_{\rm DS}$ and $\Psi_{\rm cnt}$ consist of $E_{\rm C}$ which depends on chirality,hence our model directly relates the current transport with chirality. The values of m and δ[15] for channel length (L) are given by:

$ m=\frac{\sqrt {\frac{2E_{\rm C}}{kT}+1}-Ie^{-1}}{\frac{2KT}{q}}, $

(13)

$ \delta =\frac{qLN_{\rm C}}{C}. $

(14)

Figure 3 shows the quantum capacitance model for 1-D transport. It can be seen that the total capacitance (C) is the series combination of oxide capacitance ( $C_{\rm ox}$ ) and quantum capacitance ( $C_{\rm q}$ ),which can be calculated as:

$ C=\frac{{C_{\rm q}C}_{\rm ox}}{C_{\rm ox}+C_{\rm q}}. $

(15)
Figure  .  Quantum capacitance model[8].

If $t_{\rm ox}$ is the thickness of oxide material, $\varepsilon_{0}$ is the dielectric constant for the material used and r is the radius of the nanotube,then the value of oxide capacitance ( $C_{\rm ox}$ ) is given as[17]:

$ C_{\rm ox}=\frac{2\pi \varepsilon_{0}L}{{\rm ln} \frac{t_{\rm ox}+r+\sqrt {t_{\rm ox}^{2}+2t_{\rm ox}r}}{r}}. $

(16)

The value of quantum capacitance can be calculated as[18]:

$ C_{q}=\frac{\partial q_{\rm cnt}}{\partial \Psi_{\rm cnt}}, $

(17)

where $q_{\rm cnt}$ is the charge developed across the CNT channel due to $V_{\rm GS}$ and value is given as[19]:

$ q_{\rm cnt}=\frac{q}{2}n_{\rm cnt}{\rm exp} {\left( \frac{\Psi_{\rm cnt}}{kT} \right)\left[1+{\rm exp} \left( \frac{-V_{\rm DS}}{kT} \right)\right]}. $

(18)

From Equations (11) and (12),the $\Psi_{\rm cnt}$ - $V_{\rm GS}$ characteristics are plotted and are drawn in Figure 4. It has been observed that $\Psi_{\rm cnt}$ follows $V_{\rm GS},$ for $V_{\rm GS}$ value less than the first conduction band minima. The first conduction band minima can be calculated as 0.45/d. The $\Psi_{\rm cnt}$ - $V_{\rm GS}$ characteristics are plotted for three different diameters and it can be inferred from the results that the characteristics follow the same trend. With the necessary approximations,the I-V characteristics are calculated using the above model equations for top gate CNTFET structure. The $I_{\rm DS}$ - $V_{\rm DS}$ and $I_{\rm DS}$ - $V_{\rm GS}$ characteristics obtained with MATLAB simulations through the model and simulations done in NanoTCAD ViDES are shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b) respectively. Device parameters used for all simulations are provided in Table 1.The simulations based on the model have to be found in the same trend represented by the corresponding characteristics obtained with NanoTCAD ViDES simulations. However,the little deviation can be attributed to the different modelling approaches followed. NanoTCAD~ViDES~is a device simulator able to compute transport in nanoscale devices,solving self-consistently the 3D Poisson and quantum transport equation within the NEGF formalism[7]. On the other hand,the model used is CNT charge based,which is responsible for CNT potential and band shift.

Figure  .  ψcntVGS for different diameters.
Figure  .  (a) IDSVDS characteristics for different VGS. (b) IDS–VGS characteristics for different VDS.
Table  .  Device parameters used for simulations.
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

For further analysis,simulations are done for different parameters that affect the performance of the device,namely the chirality (diameter) and oxide thickness. It is clear from the simulations that as we increase the diameter of nanotube,current increases as shown in Figure 6(a). It is due to the reason that more charge carriers develop inside the nanotube for the same gate voltage,which is responsible for conduction. As the bandgap is inversely proportional to the diameter,hence the larger the diameter the smaller the bandgap,it would result in late saturation. Similar simulations for various oxide thicknesses are shown in Figure 6(b). The curves follow the normal trend i.e. current increases as oxide thickness decreases; this is due to the large oxide capacitance for low oxide thickness. Also the large gate capacitance is responsible for good control over gate bias.

Figure  .  IDSVDS characteristics for (a) different diameters, (b) different oxide thicknesses at VGS=0.4 V.

Once the model is developed and simulated in MATLAB for the I-V characteristics,the model can be used for circuit simulations if there are no self consistent equations. If there is any self consistent equation,then it has to be written in simple manner with some constants,like the relation of $\Psi_{\rm cnt}$ with $V_{\rm GS}$ finds a self consistent solution. In order to reduce the computational complexity the relation must be simplified. The well known relation is given by[20]:

$ {\Psi _{{\rm{cnt}}}} = {V_{{\rm{GS}}}} - \alpha ({V_{{\rm{GS}}}} - {\Delta _1}), $

(19)

where $\upDelta _{1}$ is the first conduction band minima and $\alpha = \alpha + \alpha_{1}V_{\rm DS} + \alpha_{2} (V_{\rm DS})^{2}$ . The value of $\alpha $ can be calculated by plotting $V_{\rm GS}$ with $\Psi_{\rm cnt}$ . The value of $\alpha $ depends on d and $t_{\rm ox}$ . The problem for this approach is that if we change the chirality or diameter then the value of $\alpha $ changes. As is clear from Equations (11) and (12) in our model the relation of $\Psi_{\rm cnt}$ with $V_{\rm GS}$ finds a direct relation with the basic parameters. By using the mentioned equation,we developed the HSPICE model and simulated voltage transfer characteristics (VTC) for the inverter and compared them with NanoTCAD simulations data in the form of a lookup table (Figure 7).

Figure  .  VTC of inverter at VDS = 1 V.

The difference in the two VTCs is due to the fact that CNTs are by default p-type in nature[21]. So p-type CNTFET tends to remain in the linear region for a longer time than n-type,which results in the characteristics corresponding to NanoTCAD ViDES simulations. The VTC for NanoTCAD ViDES simulations has been plotted in HSPICE using the lookup table method.The same device is used to design the 6T SRAM,which consists of two cross coupled inverters and two pass transistors. Figure 8 shows SRAM cell structure using CMOS and CNTFET. The performance of the SRAM cell is analysed by measuring the important Figure of Merit called static noise margin (SNM). SNM is defined as the maximum voltage amplitude of external signal that can be algebraically added to the noise-free worst-case input level without causing the output voltage to diverge from the allowable logic voltage level[22]. Recent research shows that CNT based SRAM shows improvement in all performance parameters over conventional CMOS based design[23]. It is due to the reason that SNM depends on the threshold voltage of the PFET and NFET. In CNTFET,the threshold voltage depends on the chirality instead of the cell ratio,which can be used to design a novel SRAM cell[24]. The simplest method to measure the SNM is by plotting a butterfly curve,which results from the VTC of the two inverters. The VTC of one inverter is plotted with the inverse VTC of the second inverter to obtain the butterfly curve as shown in Figure 9. SNM can be calculated by measuring the side of the longest square that can be fitted between the mirrored butterfly curve. The standby SNM is dependent on the VTC of the cross couple inverters. The standby operation is defined when the cell tends to retain the data value as long as the SRAM cell is supplied by $V_{\rm dd}$ . The SNM values are 0.4 V for our model SRAM cell and 0.3 V for Nano TCAD simulations. This shows the considerable improvement of our model for circuit application.

Figure  .  6T SRAM structure. (a) CMOS. (b) CNTFET.
Figure  .  SNM of SRAM cell. (a) Model. (b) NanoTCAD ViDES.

A novel analytical model is presented which relates the transport mechanism directly with the chirality. The model is based on CNT surface charge calculation from the chirality and gate bias. The model is simple and can be used for circuit simulations as it denies the self consistent equations. The model is applied to the top gate CNTFET structure and compared with simulations from NanoTCAD ViDES. The model can be easily extended to Double gate geometry under the quantum capacitance limit. The HSPICE model is developed using Verilog-A and circuit simulations are performed for inverter and SRAM. The model shows considerable improvement in SNM for SRAM over NanoTCAD ViDES simulations data.



[1]
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS). 2013 edition. Emerging Research Devices Summary. http://public. itrs. net/ITRS% 2019992014% 20Mtgs% 20 Presentations% 20&% 20Links/2013ITRS/2013 Chapters/2013 ERD Summary. pdf
[2]
User Manual Stanford University CNTFET Model. https://nano.stanford.edu/stanford-cnfet-model-hspice
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Fiori G, Iannaccone G. NanoTCAD ViDES, 2008. http://vides.nanotcad.com/vides
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
User Manual, NanoTCAD ViDES, 2008(http://vides. nanotcad. com/vides/documentation/commands-5/dope reservoir)
[12]
[13]
[14]
Streetman B, Sanjay B. Solid state electronics devices. 6th ed. India:Prentice Hall, 2000, 4:89
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
http://www.intechopen. com/books/howtore ference/carbon-nanotubes/fundamental-physical-aspects-of-carbon-nanotube-transistors
[19]
http://www.techconnectworld. com/Microtech 2011/program/pdf/WCM2011-HAbebe.pdf
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
.  Band shift with gate bias at high drain bias[8].


.  Top gated CNTFET structure.


.  Quantum capacitance model[8].


.  ψcntVGS for different diameters.


.  (a) IDSVDS characteristics for different VGS. (b) IDS–VGS characteristics for different VDS.


.  IDSVDS characteristics for (a) different diameters, (b) different oxide thicknesses at VGS=0.4 V.


.  VTC of inverter at VDS = 1 V.


.  6T SRAM structure. (a) CMOS. (b) CNTFET.


.  SNM of SRAM cell. (a) Model. (b) NanoTCAD ViDES.


.   Device parameters used for simulations.

[1]
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS). 2013 edition. Emerging Research Devices Summary. http://public. itrs. net/ITRS% 2019992014% 20Mtgs% 20 Presentations% 20&% 20Links/2013ITRS/2013 Chapters/2013 ERD Summary. pdf
[2]
User Manual Stanford University CNTFET Model. https://nano.stanford.edu/stanford-cnfet-model-hspice
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Fiori G, Iannaccone G. NanoTCAD ViDES, 2008. http://vides.nanotcad.com/vides
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
User Manual, NanoTCAD ViDES, 2008(http://vides. nanotcad. com/vides/documentation/commands-5/dope reservoir)
[12]
[13]
[14]
Streetman B, Sanjay B. Solid state electronics devices. 6th ed. India:Prentice Hall, 2000, 4:89
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
http://www.intechopen. com/books/howtore ference/carbon-nanotubes/fundamental-physical-aspects-of-carbon-nanotube-transistors
[19]
http://www.techconnectworld. com/Microtech 2011/program/pdf/WCM2011-HAbebe.pdf
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
1

Design and simulation of nanoscale double-gate TFET/tunnel CNTFET

Shashi Bala, Mamta Khosla

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(4): 044001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/4/044001

2

The applications of carbon nanomaterials in fiber-shaped energy storage devices

Jingxia Wu, Yang Hong, Bingjie Wang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(1): 011004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/1/011004

3

Propagation delay and power dissipation for different aspect ratio of single-walled carbon nanotube bundled TSV

Tanu Goyal, Manoj Kumar Majumder, Brajesh Kumar Kaushik

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(6): 065001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/6/065001

4

Effect of electric field on metallic SWCNT interconnects for nanoscale technologies

Harsimran Kaur, Karamjit Singh Sandha

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(3): 035001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/3/035001

5

The combined effects of halo and linear doping effects on the high-frequency and switching performance in ballistic CNTFETs

Wei Wang, Lu Zhang, Xueying Wang, Zhubing Wang, Ting Zhang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 114004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/114004

6

Comparative study of leakage power in CNTFET over MOSFET device

Sanjeet Kumar Sinha, Saurabh Chaudhury

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 114002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/114002

7

A computational study of the effects of linear doping profile on the high-frequency and switching performances of hetero-material-gate CNTFETs

Wei Wang, Na Li, Yuzhou Ren, Hao Li, Lifen Zheng, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(12): 124002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/12/124002

8

Gate leakage current reduction in IP3 SRAM cells at 45 nm CMOS technology for multimedia applications

R. K. Singh, Neeraj Kr. Shukla, Manisha Pattanaik

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(5): 055001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/5/055001

9

A new OLED SPICE model for pixel circuit simulation in OLED-on-silicon microdisplay design

Zhao Bohua, Huang Ran, Bu Jianhui, Lü Yinxue, Wang Yiqi, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(7): 075007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/7/075007

10

Improved field emission properties of carbon nanotube cathodes by nickel electroplating and corrosion

Xiao Xiaojing, Ye Yun, Zheng Longwu, Guo Tailiang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(5): 053004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/5/053004

11

Improvement of the field emission properties of carbon nanotubes by CNT/Fe3O4 composite electrophoretic deposition

Zheng Longwu, Hu Liqin, Yang Fan, Guo Tailiang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(12): 126001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/12/126001

12

Analytical model for the dispersion of sub-threshold current in organic thin-film transistors

Chen Yingping, Shang Liwei, Ji Zhuoyu, Wang Hong, Han Maixing, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(11): 114004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/11/114004

13

Transmission line model of carbon nanotubes: through the Boltzmann transport equation

Fang Zhou

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(6): 062002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/6/062002

14

Security strategy of powered-off SRAM for resisting physical attack to data remanence

Yu Kai, Zou Xuecheng, Yu Guoyi, Wang Weixu

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(9): 095010. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/9/095010

15

A Novel SPICE Macro-Model for Power Ics

Zhao Ye, Zhou Yumei, Li Haisong, Sun Weifeng

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(2): 229-233.

16

Improving Carbon Nanotube Field Emission Display Luminescence Uniformity by Introducing a Reactive Current Limiting Layer

Li Xin, He Yongning, Liu Weihua, Zhu Changchun

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(3): 574-577.

17

Reducing Leakage of SRAM Using Dual-Gate-Oxide-Thickness Transistors in 45nm Bulk Technology

Yang Song, Wang Hong, Yang Zhijia

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(5): 745-749.

18

Design of a High-Speed Low-Power 9-Port Register File

Cong Gaojian, Qi Jiayue

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(4): 614-618.

19

Circuit Simulation of SEU for SRAM Cells

Liu Zheng, Sun Yongjie, Li Shaoqing, Liang Bin

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(1): 138-141.

20

Properties of Carbon Nanotube Field Emission

Chen Shaofeng, Xia Shanhong, Song Qinglin, Hu Ping' an, Liu Yunqi, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2003, 24(S1): 166-169.

  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Amandeep Singh, Dinesh Kumar Saini, Dinesh Agarwal, Sajal Aggarwal, Mamta Khosla, Balwinder Raj. Modeling and simulation of carbon nanotube field effect transistor and its circuit application[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(7): 074001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074001
    A m and E Singh, D K Saini, D Agarwal, S Aggarwal, M Khosla, B Raj. Modeling and simulation of carbon nanotube field effect transistor and its circuit application[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(7): 074001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074001.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 3816 Times PDF downloads: 86 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    History

    Received: 22 September 2015 Revised: Online: Published: 01 July 2016

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Amandeep Singh, Dinesh Kumar Saini, Dinesh Agarwal, Sajal Aggarwal, Mamta Khosla, Balwinder Raj. Modeling and simulation of carbon nanotube field effect transistor and its circuit application[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(7): 074001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074001 ****A m and E Singh, D K Saini, D Agarwal, S Aggarwal, M Khosla, B Raj. Modeling and simulation of carbon nanotube field effect transistor and its circuit application[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(7): 074001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074001.
      Citation:
      Amandeep Singh, Dinesh Kumar Saini, Dinesh Agarwal, Sajal Aggarwal, Mamta Khosla, Balwinder Raj. Modeling and simulation of carbon nanotube field effect transistor and its circuit application[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(7): 074001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074001 ****
      A m and E Singh, D K Saini, D Agarwal, S Aggarwal, M Khosla, B Raj. Modeling and simulation of carbon nanotube field effect transistor and its circuit application[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(7): 074001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074001.

      Modeling and simulation of carbon nanotube field effect transistor and its circuit application

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074001
      More Information
      • Corresponding author: Amandeep Singh,Email: amandeepsingh.ec.13@nitj.ac.in
      • Received Date: 2015-09-22
      • Accepted Date: 2015-12-27
      • Published Date: 2016-07-25

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return