J. Semicond. > 2018, Volume 39 > Issue 9 > 093001

SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS

Solution flow rate influence on ZnS thin films properties grown by ultrasonic spray for optoelectronic application

A. Derbali1, H. Saidi1, A. Attaf1, , H. Benamra1, A. Bouhdjer1, N. Attaf2, H. Ezzaouia3, L. Derbali3 and M. S. Aida4

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: ab_attaf@univ-biskra.dz

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/093001

PDF

Turn off MathJax

Abstract: The aim of this work is to investigate the dependence of ZnS thin films structural and optical properties with the solution flow rate during the deposition using an ultrasonic spray method. The solution flow rate ranged from 10 to 50 mL/h and the substrate temperature was maintained at 450 °C. The effect of the solution flow rate on the properties of ZnS thin films was investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), optical transmittance spectroscopy (UV–V) and the four-point method. The X-ray diffraction analysis showed that the deposited material was pure zinc sulphide, it has a cubic sphalerite structure with preferential orientation along the (111) direction. The grain size values were calculated and found to be between 38 to 82 nm. SEM analysis revealed that the deposited thin films have good adherence to the substrate surfaces, are homogeneous and have high density. The average transmission of all films is up more than 65% in the range wavelength from 200 to 1100 nm and their band gap energy values were found between 3.5–3.92 eV. The obtained film thickness varies from 390 to 1040 nm. Moreover, the electric resistivity of the deposited films increases with the increasing of the solution flow rate between 3.51 × 105 and 11 × 105 Ω·cm.

Key words: zinc sulphideX-ray diffractionultrasonic spraysolution flow rateoptical and electrical properties

Zinc sulphide (ZnS) is a semiconductor material with a large direct band gap between 3.4–3.70 eV depending upon composition[1, 2]. ZnS thin films have attracted the interest of many researchers during the last few years, due to their potential applications in the industrial domain, especially optoelectronic devices. In comparison with CdS, zinc sulphide (ZnS) is the most promising compound that plays an important role in the area of optoelectronic and photovoltaic applications, because of many advantages including: it has a transparent semiconductor, a wide gap, is non toxic, environmentally safe and exists on earth abundantly[3]. These advantages can be utilised in several applications such as: thin film solar cells, light emitting diodes and electroluminescent devices[4], antireflection coatings and optical filters[5]. There are many techniques such as pulsed-laser deposition (PLD), sputtering[6], chemical vapour deposition (CVD)[7], molecular beam epitaxial (MBE)[8], atomic layer epitaxial (ALE)[9], thermal evaporation[10], as well as spray pyrolysis[11], sol–gel[12], electro-deposition[13] and chemical bath deposition (CBD)[14] have been used to fabrication ZnS thin films. However, compared to the other deposition method, ultrasonic spray is widely used for the synthesis of nano-materials and high quality thin films and known as the most suitable method for preparing thin layers of ZnS, due to it beingeconomical, simple, feasible, flexible, cost effective, convenient for large-area deposition at low temperatures and it allows easy deposition in the atmospheric condition. Further, there are several factors that mainly affect the basic properties of the deposited thin films by this technique such as the deposition time, solution flow rate, substrate temperature, distance nozzle-substrate etc.

In this work, we investigate the effect of solution flow rate on the structural, optical and electrical properties of ZnS thin films prepared by ultrasonic spray technique at 450 °C. Obtained results prove the beneficial effect of this varied parameter. The prepared thin films can be used as an alternative to cadmium sulphide (CdS) and as a buffer layer in CIGS solar cells.

The deposition system is a special setup prepared in the laboratory as shown in Fig. 1. The nozzle is fed by the solution content in the syringe pump, which is controlled by a push syringe device (to control the infusion flow rate solution) and the incoming liquid is atomized by ultrasonic wave (40 kHz) derived from a generator (Sonics vibra-cell). The obtained stream is formed by very small and uniform droplets with diameter around 40 μm. ZnS thin films were deposited on glass substrates with dimensions of 25 × 15 mm2 at 450 °C using the ultrasonic spray technique. Prior to the deposition, the glass substrates were treated in standard cleaning as follows: rinsed in acetone and ethanol for 10 min to remove grease, then washed in distilled water to remove the impurities and residuals from substrate surfaces, finally they were dried with compressed air. The starting solution was prepared by dissolving zinc chloride (ZnCl2) and thiourea (SC(NH2)2) with 0.1 M concentration in 30 mL of methanol CH3OH and it was stirred thoroughly using a magnetic stirrer at room temperature for 2 h to obtain a complete homogeneity and transparent solution. The solution was sprayed over the heated substrate held at constant temperature. The deposition parameters of ZnS thin films were all kept constant such as: the substrate temperature was 450 °C, the deposition time was fixed at 6 min, and the distance nozzle–substrate was fixed at 50 mm. The solution flow rate was varied from 10 to 50 mL/h with a step of 10 mL/h.

Figure  1.  (Color online) Experimental set up schematic of the used spray deposition system. 1- Spray nozzle. 2- Droplets stream. 3- Substrate. 4- Substrate holder. 5- Syringe (container of solution). 6- Thermocouple K.

The deposition parameters are summarized in Table 1. Commonly, when the solution droplets reach the heated substrate surface the following chemical reaction occurs:

Table  1.  Deposition parameters used to prepare the ZnS thin film by spray ultrasonic.
Deposition parameter Corresponding value
Solution quantity 30 mL
Substrate–nozzle distance 50 mm
Substrate temperature 450 °C
Molarity of solution 0.1 M
Deposition time 6 min
Solution flow rate 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mL/h
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table
ZnCl2+CS(NH2)2+CH3OH+32O2ZnS+2NH4Cl(gas)+2CO2(gas).

According to this reaction, a ZnS thin film should be formed onto the glass substrate surface and the 2NH4Cl, CO2 leaves the system as gas.

The structural, optical and electrical characterization of all the films were treated by many techniques. The crystalline structure of the film was characterized using an X-ray diffracto-meter (D8 ADVANCED BRUKER) with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) within the 2θ range of 10°–70°. The surface morphology of the obtained thin films was studied using a VEGAS3 TESCAN scanning electron microscope. The optical transmittance was measured at room temperature using an UV–Vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer LAMBDA1050). The electrical resistivity was measured at room temperature via the four-probe method, using the JANDEL RM 3000 device.

Zinc sulphide exists in sphalerite, cubic (zinc blende) and hexagonal (wurtzite) forms. The cubic form is stable at room temperature, while the less dense hexagonal form is stable at above 1020 °C at atmospheric pressure[15]. The XRD pattern of all ZnS films prepared at different solution flow rates at the same substrate temperature (450 °C) are shown in Fig. 2. Grown films at various solution flow rates show only one preferential orientation along the (111) direction at 2θ = 28°, 75° indicating a cubic structure (JCPDS card N°: 55-0566). The (111) planes are the closest-packed ones for the cubic sphalerite structure. No other peaks related to hexagonal phases or the oxidation phases (ZnO) are seen in the XRD spectra, confirming the stoichiometric of ZnS thin films. From the XRD analysis we found that the (111) peak has a high intensity, this is due to two reasons: first, the (111) plane has the lowest surface energy[16], ascribed to the highest atomic density achieved along the (111) direction; second, that the (111) plane was parallel to the substrate surface[17]. The preferential orientation (111) was reported by several authors[1820]. As also observed in Fig. 2, that the intensity of the (111) peak increases gradually as the solution flow rate goes up to 40 mL/h, then decreases again when the solution flow rate increases. The latter indicates an improved crystallinity of the obtained films, which can be ascribed to the increased thickness of ZnS films for a solution flow rate lower than 50 mL/h and the crystallinity decreases for 50 mL/h. Moreover, we notice that there is a small difference in the position of the ZnS (111) diffraction peak (variation in the value of the angle diffraction 2θ) that is probably caused by the manifestation of the stress during the films growth.

Figure  2.  (Color online) XDR pattern of ZnS films deposited at different solution flow rate.

The lattice constant (a) for the cubic phase of ZnS is determined by the expression given by Eq. (1)[21]:

a=d(h2+k2+l2)12,
(1)

where h, k and l denote the lattice planes. The inter-planar spacing d is evaluated using the standard Bragg relation (Eq. (2)):

d=nλ2sinθ,
(2)

where θ is the diffraction angle and λ is the X-ray wavelength (1.5418 Å).

In Table 2 we present a summary of the calculation lattice constant (a) from the XRD pattern of the ZnS thin films at different solution flow rates.

Table  2.  Calculated lattice constant (a) from XRD pattern at different solution flow rates.
Solution flow rate (mL/h) hkl planes 2θ (degree) Calculated parameters Reference parameter
(JCPDS card No 05-0566)
a (Å) d (Å)
10 (111) 28.74 5.379 3.1055 a = 5.406 Å, d = 3.123 Å
20 (111) 28.68 5.383 3.108
30 (111) 28.74 5.386 3.1095
40 (111) 28.72 5.39 3.112
50 (111) 28.80 5.369 3.1
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

The resulting changes in the lattice parameter value are related to the intrinsic stress developed in the ZnS crystal lattice.

The crystallite size of ZnS was estimated by using the well-known Debye-Scherer equation[22]:

D=0.94λβcosθ,
(3)

where λ is the used radiation wavelength (λ = 1.5418 Å), θ is the diffraction angle of the concerned diffraction peak, and β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the diffraction peak corresponding to a particular crystal plane.

Using crystallite size values and the formula of Williamson and Smallman[23] (Eq. (4)) we can determine the dislocation density (δ) that represented the length of dislocation lines per unit volume:

δ=1D2.
(4)

The micro strains (ε) of films were estimated using the equations[24]:

ε=βcosθ4.
(5)

The calculated values of crystallite size, dislocation and strain are presented in Table 3.

Table  3.  Structural parameters of chemically deposited ZnS thin films at different solution flow rates.
Solution flow rate (mL/h) (hkl) 2θ (degree) FWHM (degree) D (nm) δ (1014 lines/m2) ε (10−4)
10 (111) 28.74 0.216 38 6.93 9.425
20 (111) 28.68 0.144 57 3.08 6.28
30 (111) 28.74 0.108 76 1.73 4.71
40 (111) 28.72 0.1 82 1.48 4.36
50 (111) 28.80 0.2 41 5.94 8.73
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

Table 3 shows obviously the dependence of the crystallite size with the variation of the solution flow rate during the deposition. The crystallite size was found to increase with increasing the flow rate between 10 and 40 mL/h. The individual final sizes of the nanocrystallites depend on the number of nucleation points. The solute atoms of the liquid spread along the substrate surface and begin to bind to one another at the nucleation points and form clusters. The size of the crystals increases because the nucleation density points augment due to the increased solute atoms arriving at the substrate surface, until it touches the neighbouring nanocrystallites, which means with increasing the solution flow rate the nuclei size growth is faster than the growth rate of the films, hence the nanocrystallites sizes become larger. Imen Bouhaf et al.[25] have found that the average crystallite size between 7.26 to 19.36 nm with variation of flow rates and the similar increasing of grain size between 19 to 67 nm has been obtained by Bouhdjer et al.[26]. Above the value of 40 mL/h the grain size is reduced with increasing of the solution flow rate. This indicates the deterioration of the film crystallinity because the orientation (111) was decreased and this can be due to an increase of defects density in the film network, enabling the rise of internal strain in the formed crystallites. Valenzuela and Russer reported that the FWHM of an XRD peak is reliant on the crystallite size and the lattice strain caused by the defect and/or dislocations[27].

The dislocation density varied between 1.48 × 1014 and 6.93 × 1014 lines/m2, due to the edge of a crystal or a grain boundary, which mean the grain boundary is a dislocation trap.

The surface morphology of ZnS thin films prepared at different solution flow rates is shown in Fig. 3.

Figure  3.  Scanning electron microscopy of ZnS thin films deposited at various solution flow rates: (a) 10 mL/h, (b) 20 mL/h, (c) 30 mL/h, (d) 40 mL/h, and (e) 50 mL/h.

Evidently from Fig. 3 we conclude that the prepared thin films have the same morphology and good adherence to the substrate surfaces, the thin films display a homogenous, uniform and dense without crack and pin holes surface. As also seen in Fig. 3, the surface is covered with grains having a disk-like form with different size in all scanned areas of the samples and along the surface become larger with increasing the solution flow rate, which agree with XRD results. Moreover, larger grain sizes raise the film surface roughness causing an enhancement in the optical transmittance, and this is what makes these films suitable for potential applications in optoelectronic devices.

The film thickness of ZnS films deposited at various solution flow rates was determined using the cross sectional SEM images shown in Fig. 4.

Figure  4.  (Color online) Direct thickness measurement of the film of ZnS from the cross sectional SEM images.

Fig. 5 shows the variation of the film thickness as a function of the solution flow rate. It is shown that the increased solution flow rate results in an apparent rise of the film thickness from 390 nm (10 mL/h) to 1040 nm (50 mL/h). Obtained thickness values are in good agreement with earlier reported works[28]. The highest growth rate is obtained for the film deposited with 50 mL/h, which is equal to 173 nm/min. Otherwise, the smallest growth rate equal to 65 nm/min corresponded to 10 mL/h of the solution flow rate. The increase in the deposition rate with varying the solution flow rate is suggested to be due to the increase in the kinetics of reactions during the growth of the films, which are activated thermally by means of the controlled substrate surface temperature, this allows the incoming species on the surface substrate to have enough time to find a favorable site and to form a more organized material. The resulting film thickness variation can be attributed to the increase of the amount of flow rate droplets reaching the surface substrate, hence bringing a large quantity of ingredient ions and solute atoms from the atomizer to the surface of the substrate with the increased solution flow rate. A similar increase in the film thickness has been reported by Gangopadhyay et al.[29] for ZnS thin films prepared by chemical bath deposition.

Figure  5.  (Color online) Film thickness and deposition rate as a function of solution flow rate.

The optical transmittance of the deposited ZnS films at different solution flow rate has been measured at room temperature by an UV/VIS spectrophotometer, as shown in Fig. 6, in the wavelength region of 300–1100 nm.

Figure  6.  (Color online) Transmission spectra of ZnS films deposited at different solution flow rates.

The spectral transmittance curves indicate a high transmission for an average transmittance of 65%–77% in the visible range, which is what makes it very appropriate to be used as a dielectric filter in the area of optics. These values were reported by several authors[30, 31]. According to Fig. 6, we conclude that the transparency of the prepared films decreased slightly after increasing the solution flow rate, this can be attributed to the increase in films thickness. The same observation was obtained by Benkhetta[32]. Furthermore, we notice the absence of interference fringes that may be due to the multiple reflections on the levels of the interfaces film/substrate and to film/air. So the absence of these fringes in our films indicates a roughness of free surface of ZnS films, which causes scattering of incident light on the material[33]. As we can see an abrupt fall of the transmission for the wavelengths less than 380 nm, which corresponds to strong absorption in ZnS following the transition between the valence band (VB) and the conduction band (CB). This last phenomenon is a very important characteristic for a semiconductor, which corresponds to the optical band gap energy (Eg).

The optical band gap of a semiconductor material can be obtained after drawing the curve of a tuk relationship[34]:

αhυ=K(hυEg)n,
(6)

where Eg is the optical band gap, K is a constant and is the photon energy. The index n characterizes the transition between the valence and the conduction bands. For a direct band gap semiconductor, n is 1/2. The band gap energy (Eg) is determined by extrapolating the straight line portion of the spectrum to αhυ = 0. Fig. 7 shows the band gap energy of the ZnS films as a function of the solution flow rate.

Figure  7.  (Color online) Band gap energy of the ZnS films as a function of solution flow rate.

It can be observed that the band gap slightly increases from 3.5 to 3.63 eV between 10 and 40 mL/h solution flow rates. This increase in the band gap energy (Eg) values may be attributed to the Moss-Burstein effect caused by the increase in the film thickness. According to Brustein and Moss[35] this difference is due to an increase in the charge carriers in the band of conduction. The slight increase of gap optic is a consequence of the convergence of the changing grains size values. Between the 40 and 50 mL/h flow rates the band gap energy increase quickly from 3.63 to 3.92 eV, due to the quantum size effects owing to the decrease in particle size[36] as shown in Table 3; as a result there is an increase of the grain boundary, which indicates the increasing of defects density and impurities in the ZnS thin film network. These values of the band gap energies are in good agreement with the reported values in other reports in the literature[3739]. The widening band gap energy makes these films one of the most important candidates for use as a light emitting diode (LED) and the window layer in photovoltaic solar cells, this is due to decreases in the window absorption losses and that will cause an increase in the short circuit current[40].

The resistivity of our ZnS thin films was calculated according to Eq. (7)[41]:

ρ=Rsd,
(7)

where ρ is the resistivity, RS is the square resistance ( Rs=πln2UI , U is the voltage and I is the current) and d is the films thickness. The values of the electric resistivity as a function of the solution flow rate can be shown in Fig. 8.

Figure  8.  Variation in electrical resistivity of the ZnS thin films at different solution flow rates.

As it is observed in Fig. 8, the resistivity was increased from 3.51 × 105 to 11 × 105 Ω·cm with increasing of the solution flow rate. These variations are less than those reported before[42, 43] and are in good agreement with the previous obtained results[28]. Some physical variations such as crystal structure, carrier concentration, mobility and grain size are controlled by the films resistivity. This increase in resistivity is due to the decreases of disorder in the films network, this decrease in disorder yields to the enhancement of the film homogeneity, while on the other hand the diminution of Zn atoms in the interstitial site, causing the reduction of free carriers concentration and subsequently the film resistivity rises. The increasing of the resistivity can be explained also by the effect of films thickness, the electrical resistivity in semiconductors is proportional to the film thickness, as seen in Eq. (7).

In this work, the effects of solution flow rate on the structural, optical and electrical properties of ZnS thin films deposited by ultrasonic spray were investigated. The XRD measurements reveal that the crystallinity of the films can be improved using a solution flow rate up to 40 mL/h with strongly (111) preferred orientation. The average grain size is around 58.82 nm. The resistivity was found in the range of 3.51 × 105–11 × 105 Ω·cm. The film thickness increases from 390 to 1040 nm with increasing solution flow rate. Obtained results promise a potential application of ultrasonic spray deposited ZnS thin films for the solar cells.

These produced films could be useful for applications as transparent windows in solar cells or other optoelectronic devices. For example, a stoichiometric ZnS in CIGS solar cell as a buffer layer strongly increases the CIGS cell efficiency by the alteration in the electronic structure at the ZnS/CIGS interface, moreover, the ZnS has a wider energy band gap, which transmits even higher energy photons and increases the light absorption in the absorber layer.

Finally, the solution flow rate is an important and sensitive factor for controlling the quality of the ZnS thin films deposited by ultrasonic spray technique.



[1]
Meshram R S, Thombre R M. Structural and optical properties of ZnS thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis technique. International Conference on Benchmarks in Engineering Science and Technology ICBEST, 2012
[2]
Shinde M S, Ahirrao P B, Patil R S. Structural, optical and electrical properties of nanocrystalline ZnS thin films deposited by novel chemical route. Archives Appl Sci Res, 2011, 3(2): 311
[3]
Subbaiah Y P V, Prathap P, Ramakrishna Reddy K T. Structural, electrical and optical properties of ZnS films deposited by close-spaced evaporation. Appl Surf Sci, 2006, 253: 2409 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.04.063
[4]
Xue S W, Chen J, Zou C W. Preparation and characterization of cubic lattice ZnS:Na films with (111) preferred orientation. Optoelectron Lett, 2014, 10: 0206 doi: 10.1007/s11801-014-3206-8
[5]
Ashraf M, Akhtar S M J, Alia Z, et al. The influence of substrate temperature on the structural and optical properties of zns thin films. Semiconductors, 2011, 45: 699 doi: 10.1134/S1063782611050046
[6]
Liu T Z, Ke H, Zhang H, et al. Effect of four different zinc salts and annealing treatment on growth, structural, mechanical and optical properties of nanocrystalline ZnS thin films by chemical bath deposition. Mater Sci Semicond Process, 2014, 26: 301 doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.05.003
[7]
Khalifa Z S, Mahmoud S A. Photocatalytic and optical properties of titanium dioxide thin films prepared by metalorganic chemical vapordeposition. Physica E, 2017, 91: 60 doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2017.03.010
[8]
Zhang L, Szargan R, Chasse T. Electron-diffraction and spectroscopical characterisation of ultrathin ZnS films grown by molecular beamepitaxy on GaP(001). Appl Surf Sci, 2004, 227: 261 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2003.12.002
[9]
Ku C S, Huang J M, Lin C M, et al. Fabrication of epitaxial ZnO films by atomic-layer deposition with interrupted flow. Thin Solid Films, 2009, 518: 1373 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.09.018
[10]
Dimitrova V, Tate J. Synthesis and characterization of some ZnS-based thin film phosphors for electroluminescent device applications. Thin Solid Films, 2000, 365(1): 134 doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(99)01089-5
[11]
Kriisa M, Kiirber E, Krunks M, et al. Growth and properties of ZnO films on polymeric substrate by spray pyrolysis method. Thin Solid Films, 2014, 555: 87 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.05.150
[12]
Tang W, Cameron D C. Electroluminescent zinc sulphide devices produced by sol–gel processing. Thin Solid Films, 1996, 280: 221 doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(95)08198-4
[13]
Baranski A S, Fawcett W R, McDonald A C. The mechanism of electrodeposition of cadmium sulphide on inert metals from dimethylsulphoxide solution. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, 1984, 160: 271 doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(84)80131-X
[14]
Dona J M, Herrero J. Chemical bath codeposited CdS/ZnS film characterization. Thin Solid Films, 1995, 5: 268
[15]
Nabiyouni G, Sahraei R, Toghiany M, et al. preparation and characterization of nanostructured ZnS thin films grown on glass and n-type Si substrates using a new chemical bath deposition technique. Rev Adv Mater Sci, 2011, 27: 52
[16]
Yoshiyama H, Tanaka S, Mikami I, et al. Role of surface energy in the thin film growth of electroluminescent ZnS, CaS, and SrS. J Cryst Growth, 1988, 86: 56 doi: 10.1016/0022-0248(90)90698-K
[17]
Kucukomeroglu T, Bacaksiz E, Terzioglu C, et al. Influence of fluorine doping on structural, electrical and optical properties of spray pyrolysis ZnS films. Thin Solid Films, 2008, 516: 2913 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.05.075
[18]
Xue S W. Effects of thermal annealing on the optical properties of Ar ion irradiated ZnS films. Ceram Int, 2013, 39(6): 6577 doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.01.092
[19]
Jin C, Kim H, Baek K, et al. Effects of coating and thermal annealing on the photoluminescence properties of ZnS/ZnO one-dimensional radial heterostructures. Mater Sci Eng B, 2010, 170: 143 doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2010.02.029
[20]
Zhang Z Z, Shen D Z, Zhang J Y, et al. The growth of single cubic phase ZnS thin films on silica glass by plasma-assisted metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. Thin Solid Films, 2006, 513: 114 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.01.054
[21]
Subbaiah Y P V, Prathap P, Reddy K T R. Structural, electrical and optical properties of ZnS films deposited by close-spaced evaporation. Appl Surf Sci, 2006, 253: 2409 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.04.063
[22]
Bendjedidi H, Attaf A, Saidi H, et al. Properties of n-type SnO2 semiconductor prepared by spray ultrasonic technique for photovoltaic applications. J Semicond, 2015, 36(12): 123002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/123002
[23]
Kherchachi I B, Attaf A, Saidi H, et al. Structural, optical and electrical properties of SnxSy thin films grown by spray ultrasonic. J Semicond, 2016, 37(11): 113001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/11/113001
[24]
Attaf A, Bouhdjer A, Saidi H, et al. On tuning the preferential crystalline orientation of spray pyrolysis deposited indium oxide thin films. Thin Solid Films, 2017, 625: 177 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.01.055
[25]
Kherchachi I B, Saidi H, Attaf A, et al. Influence of solution flow rate on the properties of SnS2 films prepared by ultrasonic spray. Optik, 2016, 127: 4043 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.01.120
[26]
Bouhdjer A, Saidi H, Attafa A, et al. Structural, morphological, optical, and electrical properties of In2O3 nanostructured thin films. Optik, 2016, 127: 7319 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.05.035
[27]
Valenzuela A A, Russer P. High Q coplanar transmission line resonator of YBa2Cu3O7-x on MgO. Appl Phys Lett, 1989, 55: 1029 doi: 10.1063/1.101576
[28]
Erken O, Gunes M, Ozaslan D, et al. Effect of the deposition time on optical and electrical properties of semiconductor ZnS thin films prepared by chemical bath deposition. Ind J Pure Appl Phys, 2017, 55: 471
[29]
Gangopadhyay U, Kim K, Dhunge S K, et al. Application of CBD-zinc sulfide film as an antireflection coating on very large area multicrystalline silicon solar cell. Adv Opto-Electrons, 2011, 2007: 1687
[30]
Sartale S D, Sankapal B R, Lux-Steiner M, et al. Preparation of nanocrystalline ZnS by a new chemical bath deposition route. Thin Solid Films, 2005, 168: 480
[31]
Antony A, Murali K V, Monoj R, et al. The effect of the pH value on the growth and properties of chemical-bath-deposited ZnS thin films. Mater Chem Phys, 2005, 90: 106 doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.10.017
[32]
Benkhetta Y, Attaf A, Saidi H, et al. Influence of the solution flow rate on the properties of zinc oxide (ZnO) nano-crystalline films synthesized by ultrasonic spray process. Optik, 2016, 127: 3005 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.11.236
[33]
Derbali A, Attafa A, Saidi H, et al. Investigation of structural, optical and electrical properties of ZnS thin films prepared by ultrasonic spray technique for photovoltaic applications. Optik, 2018, 154: 286 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.10.034
[34]
Bouaichia F, Saidi H, Attaf A, et al. The synthesis and characterization of sprayed ZnO thin films: As a function of solution molarity. Main Group Chem, 2016, 15: 57
[35]
Sahal M, Hartiti B, Mari B, et al. Etude des propriétés physiques des couches minces de ZnO dopées Al, préparées par la méthode de « sol-gel » associée au « spin coating ». Afrique Science, 2006, 02(3): 245
[36]
Doha M H, Alam M J, Rabeya J, et al. Characterization of chemically deposited ZnS thin films on bare and conducting glass. Optik, 2015, 126: 5194 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.09.234
[37]
Ongul F, Ulutas U, Yuksel S A, et al. Influences of annealing temperature and thickness on ZnS buffer layers for inverted hybrid solar cells. Synth Metals, 2016, 220: 1 doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.05.017
[38]
Martínez-Martínez S, Mayen-Hernandez S A, de Moure-Flores F, et al. Sulfiding effects on ZnS thin films obtained by evaporation technique. Vacuum, 2016, 130: 154 doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.05.011
[39]
Göde F, Gümüş C, Zor M. Investigations on the physical properties of the polycrystalline ZnS thin films deposited by the chemical bath deposition method. J Cryst Growth, 2200, 7
[40]
Ates A, Ali Yıldırım M, Kundakcı M, et al. Annealing and light effect on optical and electrical properties of ZnS thin films grown with the SILAR method. Mater Sci Semicond Process, 2007, 10: 281 doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2008.04.003
[41]
Ben Achour Z, Ktari T, Ouertani B, et al. Effect of doping level and spray time on zinc oxide thin films produced by spray pyrolysis for transparent electrodes applications. Sens Actuators A, 2007, 134: 447 doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2006.05.001
[42]
Farid H, Rafea M A, El-Wahidy E F, et al. Preparation and characterization of ZnS nanocrystalline thin films by low cost dip technique. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron, 2014, 25: 2017
[43]
Goktas A, Aslan F, Yasar E, et al. Preparation and characterisation of thickness dependent nano-structured ZnS thin films by sol-gel technique. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron, 2012, 23: 1361 doi: 10.1007/s10854-011-0599-z
Fig. 1.  (Color online) Experimental set up schematic of the used spray deposition system. 1- Spray nozzle. 2- Droplets stream. 3- Substrate. 4- Substrate holder. 5- Syringe (container of solution). 6- Thermocouple K.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) XDR pattern of ZnS films deposited at different solution flow rate.

Fig. 3.  Scanning electron microscopy of ZnS thin films deposited at various solution flow rates: (a) 10 mL/h, (b) 20 mL/h, (c) 30 mL/h, (d) 40 mL/h, and (e) 50 mL/h.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) Direct thickness measurement of the film of ZnS from the cross sectional SEM images.

Fig. 5.  (Color online) Film thickness and deposition rate as a function of solution flow rate.

Fig. 6.  (Color online) Transmission spectra of ZnS films deposited at different solution flow rates.

Fig. 7.  (Color online) Band gap energy of the ZnS films as a function of solution flow rate.

Fig. 8.  Variation in electrical resistivity of the ZnS thin films at different solution flow rates.

Table 1.   Deposition parameters used to prepare the ZnS thin film by spray ultrasonic.

Deposition parameter Corresponding value
Solution quantity 30 mL
Substrate–nozzle distance 50 mm
Substrate temperature 450 °C
Molarity of solution 0.1 M
Deposition time 6 min
Solution flow rate 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mL/h
DownLoad: CSV

Table 2.   Calculated lattice constant (a) from XRD pattern at different solution flow rates.

Solution flow rate (mL/h) hkl planes 2θ (degree) Calculated parameters Reference parameter
(JCPDS card No 05-0566)
a (Å) d (Å)
10 (111) 28.74 5.379 3.1055 a = 5.406 Å, d = 3.123 Å
20 (111) 28.68 5.383 3.108
30 (111) 28.74 5.386 3.1095
40 (111) 28.72 5.39 3.112
50 (111) 28.80 5.369 3.1
DownLoad: CSV

Table 3.   Structural parameters of chemically deposited ZnS thin films at different solution flow rates.

Solution flow rate (mL/h) (hkl) 2θ (degree) FWHM (degree) D (nm) δ (1014 lines/m2) ε (10−4)
10 (111) 28.74 0.216 38 6.93 9.425
20 (111) 28.68 0.144 57 3.08 6.28
30 (111) 28.74 0.108 76 1.73 4.71
40 (111) 28.72 0.1 82 1.48 4.36
50 (111) 28.80 0.2 41 5.94 8.73
DownLoad: CSV
[1]
Meshram R S, Thombre R M. Structural and optical properties of ZnS thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis technique. International Conference on Benchmarks in Engineering Science and Technology ICBEST, 2012
[2]
Shinde M S, Ahirrao P B, Patil R S. Structural, optical and electrical properties of nanocrystalline ZnS thin films deposited by novel chemical route. Archives Appl Sci Res, 2011, 3(2): 311
[3]
Subbaiah Y P V, Prathap P, Ramakrishna Reddy K T. Structural, electrical and optical properties of ZnS films deposited by close-spaced evaporation. Appl Surf Sci, 2006, 253: 2409 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.04.063
[4]
Xue S W, Chen J, Zou C W. Preparation and characterization of cubic lattice ZnS:Na films with (111) preferred orientation. Optoelectron Lett, 2014, 10: 0206 doi: 10.1007/s11801-014-3206-8
[5]
Ashraf M, Akhtar S M J, Alia Z, et al. The influence of substrate temperature on the structural and optical properties of zns thin films. Semiconductors, 2011, 45: 699 doi: 10.1134/S1063782611050046
[6]
Liu T Z, Ke H, Zhang H, et al. Effect of four different zinc salts and annealing treatment on growth, structural, mechanical and optical properties of nanocrystalline ZnS thin films by chemical bath deposition. Mater Sci Semicond Process, 2014, 26: 301 doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.05.003
[7]
Khalifa Z S, Mahmoud S A. Photocatalytic and optical properties of titanium dioxide thin films prepared by metalorganic chemical vapordeposition. Physica E, 2017, 91: 60 doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2017.03.010
[8]
Zhang L, Szargan R, Chasse T. Electron-diffraction and spectroscopical characterisation of ultrathin ZnS films grown by molecular beamepitaxy on GaP(001). Appl Surf Sci, 2004, 227: 261 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2003.12.002
[9]
Ku C S, Huang J M, Lin C M, et al. Fabrication of epitaxial ZnO films by atomic-layer deposition with interrupted flow. Thin Solid Films, 2009, 518: 1373 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.09.018
[10]
Dimitrova V, Tate J. Synthesis and characterization of some ZnS-based thin film phosphors for electroluminescent device applications. Thin Solid Films, 2000, 365(1): 134 doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(99)01089-5
[11]
Kriisa M, Kiirber E, Krunks M, et al. Growth and properties of ZnO films on polymeric substrate by spray pyrolysis method. Thin Solid Films, 2014, 555: 87 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.05.150
[12]
Tang W, Cameron D C. Electroluminescent zinc sulphide devices produced by sol–gel processing. Thin Solid Films, 1996, 280: 221 doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(95)08198-4
[13]
Baranski A S, Fawcett W R, McDonald A C. The mechanism of electrodeposition of cadmium sulphide on inert metals from dimethylsulphoxide solution. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, 1984, 160: 271 doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(84)80131-X
[14]
Dona J M, Herrero J. Chemical bath codeposited CdS/ZnS film characterization. Thin Solid Films, 1995, 5: 268
[15]
Nabiyouni G, Sahraei R, Toghiany M, et al. preparation and characterization of nanostructured ZnS thin films grown on glass and n-type Si substrates using a new chemical bath deposition technique. Rev Adv Mater Sci, 2011, 27: 52
[16]
Yoshiyama H, Tanaka S, Mikami I, et al. Role of surface energy in the thin film growth of electroluminescent ZnS, CaS, and SrS. J Cryst Growth, 1988, 86: 56 doi: 10.1016/0022-0248(90)90698-K
[17]
Kucukomeroglu T, Bacaksiz E, Terzioglu C, et al. Influence of fluorine doping on structural, electrical and optical properties of spray pyrolysis ZnS films. Thin Solid Films, 2008, 516: 2913 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.05.075
[18]
Xue S W. Effects of thermal annealing on the optical properties of Ar ion irradiated ZnS films. Ceram Int, 2013, 39(6): 6577 doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.01.092
[19]
Jin C, Kim H, Baek K, et al. Effects of coating and thermal annealing on the photoluminescence properties of ZnS/ZnO one-dimensional radial heterostructures. Mater Sci Eng B, 2010, 170: 143 doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2010.02.029
[20]
Zhang Z Z, Shen D Z, Zhang J Y, et al. The growth of single cubic phase ZnS thin films on silica glass by plasma-assisted metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. Thin Solid Films, 2006, 513: 114 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.01.054
[21]
Subbaiah Y P V, Prathap P, Reddy K T R. Structural, electrical and optical properties of ZnS films deposited by close-spaced evaporation. Appl Surf Sci, 2006, 253: 2409 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.04.063
[22]
Bendjedidi H, Attaf A, Saidi H, et al. Properties of n-type SnO2 semiconductor prepared by spray ultrasonic technique for photovoltaic applications. J Semicond, 2015, 36(12): 123002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/123002
[23]
Kherchachi I B, Attaf A, Saidi H, et al. Structural, optical and electrical properties of SnxSy thin films grown by spray ultrasonic. J Semicond, 2016, 37(11): 113001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/11/113001
[24]
Attaf A, Bouhdjer A, Saidi H, et al. On tuning the preferential crystalline orientation of spray pyrolysis deposited indium oxide thin films. Thin Solid Films, 2017, 625: 177 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.01.055
[25]
Kherchachi I B, Saidi H, Attaf A, et al. Influence of solution flow rate on the properties of SnS2 films prepared by ultrasonic spray. Optik, 2016, 127: 4043 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.01.120
[26]
Bouhdjer A, Saidi H, Attafa A, et al. Structural, morphological, optical, and electrical properties of In2O3 nanostructured thin films. Optik, 2016, 127: 7319 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.05.035
[27]
Valenzuela A A, Russer P. High Q coplanar transmission line resonator of YBa2Cu3O7-x on MgO. Appl Phys Lett, 1989, 55: 1029 doi: 10.1063/1.101576
[28]
Erken O, Gunes M, Ozaslan D, et al. Effect of the deposition time on optical and electrical properties of semiconductor ZnS thin films prepared by chemical bath deposition. Ind J Pure Appl Phys, 2017, 55: 471
[29]
Gangopadhyay U, Kim K, Dhunge S K, et al. Application of CBD-zinc sulfide film as an antireflection coating on very large area multicrystalline silicon solar cell. Adv Opto-Electrons, 2011, 2007: 1687
[30]
Sartale S D, Sankapal B R, Lux-Steiner M, et al. Preparation of nanocrystalline ZnS by a new chemical bath deposition route. Thin Solid Films, 2005, 168: 480
[31]
Antony A, Murali K V, Monoj R, et al. The effect of the pH value on the growth and properties of chemical-bath-deposited ZnS thin films. Mater Chem Phys, 2005, 90: 106 doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.10.017
[32]
Benkhetta Y, Attaf A, Saidi H, et al. Influence of the solution flow rate on the properties of zinc oxide (ZnO) nano-crystalline films synthesized by ultrasonic spray process. Optik, 2016, 127: 3005 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.11.236
[33]
Derbali A, Attafa A, Saidi H, et al. Investigation of structural, optical and electrical properties of ZnS thin films prepared by ultrasonic spray technique for photovoltaic applications. Optik, 2018, 154: 286 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.10.034
[34]
Bouaichia F, Saidi H, Attaf A, et al. The synthesis and characterization of sprayed ZnO thin films: As a function of solution molarity. Main Group Chem, 2016, 15: 57
[35]
Sahal M, Hartiti B, Mari B, et al. Etude des propriétés physiques des couches minces de ZnO dopées Al, préparées par la méthode de « sol-gel » associée au « spin coating ». Afrique Science, 2006, 02(3): 245
[36]
Doha M H, Alam M J, Rabeya J, et al. Characterization of chemically deposited ZnS thin films on bare and conducting glass. Optik, 2015, 126: 5194 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.09.234
[37]
Ongul F, Ulutas U, Yuksel S A, et al. Influences of annealing temperature and thickness on ZnS buffer layers for inverted hybrid solar cells. Synth Metals, 2016, 220: 1 doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.05.017
[38]
Martínez-Martínez S, Mayen-Hernandez S A, de Moure-Flores F, et al. Sulfiding effects on ZnS thin films obtained by evaporation technique. Vacuum, 2016, 130: 154 doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.05.011
[39]
Göde F, Gümüş C, Zor M. Investigations on the physical properties of the polycrystalline ZnS thin films deposited by the chemical bath deposition method. J Cryst Growth, 2200, 7
[40]
Ates A, Ali Yıldırım M, Kundakcı M, et al. Annealing and light effect on optical and electrical properties of ZnS thin films grown with the SILAR method. Mater Sci Semicond Process, 2007, 10: 281 doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2008.04.003
[41]
Ben Achour Z, Ktari T, Ouertani B, et al. Effect of doping level and spray time on zinc oxide thin films produced by spray pyrolysis for transparent electrodes applications. Sens Actuators A, 2007, 134: 447 doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2006.05.001
[42]
Farid H, Rafea M A, El-Wahidy E F, et al. Preparation and characterization of ZnS nanocrystalline thin films by low cost dip technique. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron, 2014, 25: 2017
[43]
Goktas A, Aslan F, Yasar E, et al. Preparation and characterisation of thickness dependent nano-structured ZnS thin films by sol-gel technique. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron, 2012, 23: 1361 doi: 10.1007/s10854-011-0599-z
1

Studies on morphology, electrical and optical characteristics of Al-doped ZnO thin films grown by atomic layer deposition

Li Chen, Xinliang Chen, Zhongxin Zhou, Sheng Guo, Ying Zhao, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(3): 033004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/3/033004

2

Analysis of morphological, structural and electrical properties of annealed TiO2 nanowires deposited by GLAD technique

B. Shougaijam, R. Swain, C. Ngangbam, T.R. Lenka

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(5): 053001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/5/053001

3

Structural, optical and electrical properties of SnxSy thin films grown by spray ultrasonic

I. B. Kherchachi, A. Attaf, H. Saidi, A. Bouhdjer, H. Bendjedidi, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(3): 032001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/3/032001

4

Structural, optical and electrical properties of zinc oxide thin films deposited by a spray pyrolysis technique

Yacine Aoun, Boubaker Benhaoua, Brahim Gasmi, Said Benramache

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(1): 013002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/1/013002

5

Correlation between the structural, morphological, optical, and electrical properties of In2O3 thin films obtained by an ultrasonic spray CVD process

A. Bouhdjer, A. Attaf, H. Saidi, H. Bendjedidi, Y. Benkhetta, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(8): 082002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/8/082002

6

Solid State Physics View of Liquid State Chemistry——Electrical conduction in pure water

Binbin Jie, Chihtang Sah

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(12): 121001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/12/121001

7

AC-electronic and dielectric properties of semiconducting phthalocyanine compounds:a comparative study

Safa'a M. Hraibat, Rushdi M-L. Kitaneh, Mohammad M. Abu-Samreh, Abdelkarim M. Saleh

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(11): 112001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/11/112001

8

Correlation between electrical conductivity-optical band gap energy and precursor molarities ultrasonic spray deposition of ZnO thin films

Said Benramache, Okba Belahssen, Abderrazak Guettaf, Ali Arif

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(11): 113001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/11/113001

9

Structural, morphological, dielectrical and magnetic properties of Mn substituted cobalt ferrite

S. P. Yadav, S. S. Shinde, A. A. Kadam, K. Y. Rajpure

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(9): 093002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/9/093002

10

Ultrasonic spray pyrolysis deposition of SnSe and SnSe2 using a single spray solution

Jorge Sergio Narro-Rios, Manoj Ramachandran, Dalia Martínez-Escobar, Aarón Sánchez-Juárez

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(1): 013001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/1/013001

11

Dielectric response and electric properties of organic semiconducting phthalocyanine thin films

A. M. Saleh, S. M. Hraibat, R. M-L. Kitaneh, M. M. Abu-Samreh, S. M. Musameh, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(8): 082002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/8/082002

12

Radiation effect on the optical and electrical properties of CdSe(In)/p-Si heterojunction photovoltaic solar cells

M. Ashry, S. Fares

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(10): 102001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/10/102001

13

Structural and optoelectronic properties of sprayed Sb:SnO2 thin films: Effects of substrate temperature and nozzle-to-substrate distance

A. R. Babar, S. S. Shinde, A. V. Moholkar, C. H. Bhosale, K. Y. Rajpure, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(10): 102001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/10/102001

14

Optical and electrical properties of N-doped ZnO and fabrication of thin-film transistors

Zhu Xiaming, Wu Huizhen, Wang Shuangjiang, Zhang Yingying, Cai Chunfeng, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(3): 033001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/3/033001

15

NTC and electrical properties of nickel and gold doped n-type silicon material

Dong Maojin, Chen Zhaoyang, Fan Yanwei, Wang Junhua, Tao Mingde, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 083007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/083007

16

Structural and electrical characteristics of lanthanum oxide gate dielectric film on GaAs pHEMT technology

Wu Chia-Song, Liu Hsing-Chung

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(11): 114004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/11/114004

17

Influence of zinc phthalocyanines on photoelectrical properties of hydrogenated amorphous silicon

Zhang Changsha, Zeng Xiangbo, Peng Wenbo, Shi Mingji, Liu Shiyong, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 083004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/083004

18

Analysis of PTCDA/ITO Surface and Interface Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy

Tang Ning, Shen Bo, Wang Maojun, Yang Zhijian, Xu Ke, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 235-238.

19

Analysis of PTCDA/ITO Surface and Interface Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy

Ou Guping, Song Zhen, Gui Wenming, Zhang Fujia

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 229-234.

20

Effects of Thickness on Properties of ZnO Films Grown on Si by MOCVD

Shen Wenjuan, Wang Jun, Duan Yao, Wang Qiyuan, Zeng Yiping, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(11): 2069-2073.

1. Al-Zahrani, H.Y.S., El Radaf, I.M., Lahmar, A. A Study on the Impact of Vanadium Doping on the Structural, Optical, and Optoelectrical Properties of ZnS Thin Films for Optoelectronic Applications. Micromachines, 2025, 16(3): 337. doi:10.3390/mi16030337
2. Chala, S., Saidi, H., Derbali, A. et al. Study of Al dopant effect on the physical properties and the photoluminescence of spin coated anatase TiO2:Al3+ thin films. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, 2025. doi:10.1007/s10971-025-06746-0
3. Derbali, L., Bouhjar, F., Derbali, A. Photocurrent performance and enhancement of opto-electronic properties of spray pyrolysis deposited ZnO thin films via V-doping. Modern Physics Letters B, 2024, 38(9): 2450060. doi:10.1142/S021798492450060X
4. Besra, S., Belakroum, K., Iaiche, S. et al. Facile synthesis and characterization of ZnO:Al/ZnS/NiO heterojunction thin films with enhanced photocatalytic activities. Solid State Sciences, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2023.107282
5. Efe, F.O., Olofinjana, B., Fasakin, O. et al. Opto-electronic properties of copper-zinc-sulfide thin films grown via metalorganic-chemical vapor deposition technique at different flow rates. Physica Scripta, 2023, 98(8): 085914. doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ace2f8
6. Metwly, W., Fadl, E., Soliman, M. et al. Glutathione-Capped ZnS Quantum Dots-Urease Conjugate as a Highly Sensitive Urea Probe. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, 2023, 33(5): 1388-1399. doi:10.1007/s10904-023-02592-1
7. Markov, V.F., Korotcenkov, G., Maskaeva, L.N. Thin Films of Wide Band Gap II-VI Semiconductor Compounds: Features of Preparation. Handbook of II-VI Semiconductor-Based Sensors and Radiation Detectors: Materials and Technology: Volume 1, 2023. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19531-0_10
8. Ben khetta, O., Attaf, A., Derbali, A. et al. Precursor concentration effect on the physical properties of transparent titania (Anatase-TiO2) thin films grown by ultrasonic spray process for optoelectronics application. Optical Materials, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112790
9. Anne Sarah Christinal, R., Prakash, I., Chakravarty, S. et al. Spray pyrolysed Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film photovoltaic cell fabricated using cost effective materials. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.physb.2022.413911
10. Zeribi, F., Attaf, A., Derbali, A. et al. Dependence of the Physical Properties of Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Thin Films Grown by Sol-Gel (Spin-Coating) Process on Thickness. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2022, 11(2): 023003. doi:10.1149/2162-8777/ac5168
11. Attaf, A., Djadai, A., Derbali, A. et al. The effect of ultrasonic wave amplitude on the physical properties of zinc oxide (ZnO) deposited by ultrasonic spray method. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.mseb.2021.115525
12. Godavarti, U.D., Nagaraju, P., Yelsani, V. et al. Synthesis and characterization of ZnS-based quantum dots to trace low concentration of ammonia. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(12): 122901. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/42/12/122901
13. Jrad, A., Naouai, M., Ammar, S. et al. Structural, morphological, optical and luminescence investigations of chemical bath deposited Ni:ZnS thin films. Materials Today Communications, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102746
14. Nouadji, R., Attaf, A., Derbali, A. et al. Film thickness effect on structural, optical and electrical properties of indium oxide (In2O3) thin films grown via sol-gel method. Main Group Chemistry, 2021, 20(4): 513-527. doi:10.3233/MGC-210063
15. Benamra, H., Saidi, H., Attaf, A. et al. Physical properties of Al-doped ZnS thin films prepared by ultrasonic spray technique. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100645
16. Cheriet, H., Moualkia, H., Barille, R. et al. Morphological, structural and optical characterizations of zn-doped cds buffer layer elaborated by chemical bath deposition. Surface Review and Letters, 2020, 27(11): 2050009. doi:10.1142/S0218625X20500092
17. Attaf, A., Derbali, A., Saidi, H. et al. Physical properties of Pb doped ZnS thin films prepared by ultrasonic spray technique. Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, 2020, 384(26): 126199. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2019.126199
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    A. Derbali, H. Saidi, A. Attaf, H. Benamra, A. Bouhdjer, N. Attaf, H. Ezzaouia, L. Derbali, M. S. Aida. Solution flow rate influence on ZnS thin films properties grown by ultrasonic spray for optoelectronic application[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(9): 093001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/093001
    A Derbali, H Saidi, A Attaf, H Benamra, A Bouhdjer, N Attaf, H Ezzaouia, L Derbali, M S Aida, Solution flow rate influence on ZnS thin films properties grown by ultrasonic spray for optoelectronic application[J]. J. Semicond., 2018, 39(9): 093001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/093001.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 4717 Times PDF downloads: 155 Times Cited by: 17 Times

    History

    Received: 09 December 2017 Revised: 14 February 2018 Online: Uncorrected proof: 16 May 2018Accepted Manuscript: 05 July 2018Published: 01 September 2018

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      A. Derbali, H. Saidi, A. Attaf, H. Benamra, A. Bouhdjer, N. Attaf, H. Ezzaouia, L. Derbali, M. S. Aida. Solution flow rate influence on ZnS thin films properties grown by ultrasonic spray for optoelectronic application[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(9): 093001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/093001 ****A Derbali, H Saidi, A Attaf, H Benamra, A Bouhdjer, N Attaf, H Ezzaouia, L Derbali, M S Aida, Solution flow rate influence on ZnS thin films properties grown by ultrasonic spray for optoelectronic application[J]. J. Semicond., 2018, 39(9): 093001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/093001.
      Citation:
      A. Derbali, H. Saidi, A. Attaf, H. Benamra, A. Bouhdjer, N. Attaf, H. Ezzaouia, L. Derbali, M. S. Aida. Solution flow rate influence on ZnS thin films properties grown by ultrasonic spray for optoelectronic application[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(9): 093001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/093001 ****
      A Derbali, H Saidi, A Attaf, H Benamra, A Bouhdjer, N Attaf, H Ezzaouia, L Derbali, M S Aida, Solution flow rate influence on ZnS thin films properties grown by ultrasonic spray for optoelectronic application[J]. J. Semicond., 2018, 39(9): 093001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/093001.

      Solution flow rate influence on ZnS thin films properties grown by ultrasonic spray for optoelectronic application

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/093001
      More Information
      • Corresponding author: ab_attaf@univ-biskra.dz
      • Received Date: 2017-12-09
      • Revised Date: 2018-02-14
      • Published Date: 2018-09-01

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return