J. Semicond. > 2019, Volume 40 > Issue 11 > 111603

REVIEWS

Electrospun flexible sensor

Qi Liu1, Seeram Ramakrishna1, 2 and Yun-Ze Long1,

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Yun-Ze Long, E-mail: yunze.long@163.com or yunze.long@qdu.edu.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/11/111603

PDF

Turn off MathJax

Abstract: Flexible sensors have received wide attention because of their ability to adapt to a variety of complex environments. Electrospinning technology has significant advantages in the preparation of flexible sensors. This paper summarizes the progress in the preparation of flexible sensors by electrospinning. Sensors that respond to light, stress, and gas are presented separately. Finally, some directions for electrospinning and flexible sensors are discussed.

Key words: electrospinningsensornanofibers

Flexible sensors have been widely used in various types of electronic devices. Their advantage lies in their high flexibility, ability to adapt to various complex environments, and broad development prospects. Flexible sensors with nanomaterials have a larger specific surface area to further enhance sensor performance. There are several ways to make nanomaterials. Among them, electrospinning provides a low-cost, large-scale method for preparing flexible nanofibers. The morphology of the fibers can be adjusted during the electrospinning process to obtain different structures[14]. The electrospun fiber membrane is easily attached to the electrode material, simplifying the assembly steps of the sensor. Electrospinning enables the preparation of a variety of materials that respond to the external environment, including temperature[5], electromagnetic field[6], pressure[7], light[8, 9], humidity[10], pH[11], and drugs[12, 13]. The surface wettability of some materials can be altered by electrospinning, which expands the range of applications for related materials[14]. Moreover, the electrospun fiber membrane has high porosity and good gas permeability and can be used in the medical field[15, 16]. For these reasons electrospinning has wide application prospects in various electronic devices such as wearable devices.

In this review, we summarize the progress in the preparation of flexible sensors by electrospinning. Photodetectors, stress sensors, gas sensors and nanogenerators were introduced. The prospect of flexible sensors and electrospinning were discussed towards the end.

Electrospinning devices typically consist of a propulsion pump, a high voltage power supply, and a collection plate. When the voltage applied at the end of the needle exceeds a certain critical value, the charge repulsion on the surface of the solution exceeds its surface tension, and the jet formed at the end of the needle is deposited on the collecting plate under the action of an electric field to form a fiber membrane. The parameters used in the electrospinning process will affect the morphology of the fiber to some extent. An increase in the spinning voltage, a decrease in the advancement speed, and an increase in the distance between the electrodes and the collection plate can reduce the diameter of the resulting nanofiber. There are usually two methods for preparing conductive nanofibers by electrospinning, as shown in Fig. 1[17, 18]. The fibers obtained by electrospinning generally have flexibility. However, the solution used for electrospinning needs to have a certain viscosity, and a polymer solution is often used. This causes the fibers obtained by electrospinning to be subjected to subsequent processing to improve their electrical conductivity.

Figure  1.  (Color online) (a) Flowchart for preparing conductive nanofibers by surface modification[18]. (b) Flowchart for preparing conductive nanofibers by heat treatment[17].

An electrospun fiber is used as a template, and a metal material such as gold or copper is deposited thereon to obtain a conductive fiber. The electrospinning film can also be removed by sintering, dissolution, or the like in a subsequent step. Similarly, conductive fibers can also be obtained by chemically depositing or coating a polymer conductive material, carbon nanotubes or the like onto the surface of the fiber membrane. This method of treating only the surface of the fiber causes the conductive material to form a cylindrical structure, increase the specific surface area, and have a certain conductivity. This also increases their sensitivity as a gas sensor.

Conductive fibers can also be obtained by heat treating a precursor of a certain material. For example, the carbon fiber is obtained by electrospinning a polyacrylonitrile (PAN) solution of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and heat treatment. Mixing a precursor thereof with a polymer solution and electrospinning, then sintering in an air atmosphere to remove components such as a polymer can obtain an inorganic oxide fiber. This method can completely remove the polymer component and obtain a continuous conductive fiber.

Due to its photoelectric effect, semiconductors can be exposed to light and cause a change in conductivity. The light intensity can be characterized by changes in material current. Zhang et al.[19] prepared La-doped p-type ZnO nanofibers by adding rare earth element La to the electrospun zinc oxide precursor solution. 0.2 g of cesium acetate (C6H9O6La), 1.0 g of zinc acetate (C4H6O4Zn·2H2O) and 1.5 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) were mixed with 0.2 g of water (H2O) and 8.5 g of ethanol (C2H6O), and then electrospun fibers were obtained by electrospinning, followed by heat treatment to obtain p-type ZnO fibers. Later, Liu et al.[20, 21] also obtained Ce-doped p-type ZnO nanofibers by doping the rare earth element Ce. As shown in Fig. 2[19, 21], these fibers all have good optoelectronic properties. Liu et al.[22] developed the printing process for printing ZnO nanofibers using near-field electrospinning. A near-field electrospinning and printer were combined to design a printing process. As shown in Fig. 3[22], The resulting ZnO fiber array has good photoelectric response and detection rate.

Figure  2.  (Color online) (a) Schematic diagram of field effect test device for zinc oxide fiber. (b) Field effect characteristics of Ce-doped ZnO[21]. (c) IV curve of La-doped ZnO at different irradiation intensities. (d) Field effect characteristics of La-doped ZnO[19].
Figure  3.  (Color online) (a) Schematic of the printing unit. (b) Time-domain optical response of the ZnO fiber array. (c) IV curve of the ZnO fiber array. (d) Flexible photodetector. (e) Optical photo of the nanowire array and silver electrode with a scale of 30 microns[22].

The conductive fiber membrane prepared by electrospinning is easily changed under pressure for the variation of shape, and the electrical resistance of the fiber membrane is also changed. Therefore, the change in the current of the conductive fiber membrane can characterize the change in the corresponding stress[4, 23]. Tong et al.[24] provided a convenient method for making strain sensors. A thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) nanofiber membrane was obtained by electrospinning, and polyaniline (PANI) was polymerized in situ on the fiber membrane to obtain a PANI/TPU sensor. The sensor has good response speed and stability and can detect small movements of the human body, as shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b)[24]. Yu et al.[25] prepared patterned nanofiber membranes for stress sensors, as shown in Figs. 4(c)4(f) [25]. 2.2 g of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) was dissolved in 3.9 g of DMF and 3.9 g of acetone mixed solution, and the solution was electrospun onto the patterned collector, followed by in situ polymerization on the patterned spun film. Polyaniline obtained a conductive polymer fiber membrane. The sample had a fast response time and good recovery for the press test, and the tensile properties were 2.6 times that of the corresponding nonwoven nanofiber film. The reason for this result is mainly related to the morphology of the fiber membrane.

Figure  4.  (Color online) (a) IV curves for PANI/TPU sensors under different tensions. (b) Responses when fingers are bent[24]. (c–f) Fibers with different patterned collectors[25].

A silver-loaded alginate stress sensor was prepared by Hu et al.[26]. A sodium alginate fiber membrane was obtained by electrospinning with 2 g of dimethyl sulfoxide, 36.8 g of water, 0.4 g of Triton X-100, 0.16 g of polyethylene oxide and 0.64 g of sodium alginate. The fiber membrane was completely wetted with a silver nitrate solution, and then dropped onto the fiber membrane with dimethylamine borane (DMAB). After a while, the silver-loaded alginate nanofiber membrane was obtained. The sample has certain antibacterial properties and good repeatability and durability, as shown in Fig. 5[26]. The sensor has good sensitivity to monitor human breathing and distinguish between different sounds. By creating a pressure distribution matrix, the sensor can detect the spatial pressure distribution[26].

Figure  5.  (Color online) (a) Electrical performance of the sensor at different pressures. (b) Current change of the sensor at different pressures. (c) Response of the sensor to human respiration. (d) Response of the sensor to “Nano” and “Perfect”. (e) Electrode array diagram. (f) Pressure distribution[26].

Due to its structural advantages, the large specific surface area and high porosity allow rapid gas detection, and the nano-conductive fiber membranes are well suited for use as gas sensors. Zinc oxide has a special shape and is widely used in various types of sensors. Zhang et al.[27] prepared comb-like ZnO nanofibers for gas sensors. Comb-shaped ZnO nanofibers were obtained by chemical vapor deposition using Au as a catalyst and zinc powder as a raw material. The sample showed a good response to CO at room temperature. Later, Zhang et al.[28] prepared a CO gas sensor again to improve the sensitivity of the sensor. PEDOT:PSS / PVP composite nanoparticles were prepared by electrospinning technique using poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). The fiber exhibits good sensitivity to CO, as shown in Figs. 6(a) and 6(b)[28]. The ammonia gas sensor was also prepared by Zhang et al.[29]. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF) to perform electrospinning to obtain a PMMA nanofiber membrane. Good ammonia gas sensitivity is obtained by in-situ polymerization of polyaniline on the fiber, as shown in Figs. 6(c) and 6(d)[29]. Humidity sensors were also prepared by electrospinning. The barium titanate (BaTiO3) fiber obtained by electrospinning and calcination of Sheng et al.[30] exhibits good humidity-sensitive properties, as shown in Figs. 6(e) and 6(f)[30].

Figure  6.  (Color online) (a) PEDOT:PSS/PVP composite nanofibers response to CO. (b) PEDOT:PSS/PVP composite nanofibers response to different concentrations of CO[28]. (c) Polyaniline/PMMA nanofibers in response to different concentrations of ammonia. (d) Sensitivity of polyaniline/PMMA nanofibers[29]. (e) Humidity response of BaTiO3 fiber. (f) Recovery performance of BaTiO3 fiber[30].

The diameter of nanofibers affects their sensing properties. Zhang et al.[31] demonstrated that the decrease of nanofiber diameter can improve its sensing sensitivity by preparing ultrafine fibers. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), PEDOT: PSS as a precursor, a negative high-voltage power supply was added to increase the voltage of the electrospinning process, and the ultrafine fibers were successfully prepared by gas flow assistance. The fiber has an average diameter of 68 nm and is more sensitive to ammonia than conventional electrospun fibers, as shown in Fig. 7[31].

Figure  7.  (Color online) (a) SEM image of ultrafine fiber. (b) Particle size distribution of ultrafine fiber. (c, d) Ammonia response curve of traditional electrospun fiber. (e, f) Ammonia response curve of microfiber[31].

Zhang et al.[18] prepared Ag/alginate nanofibers by ion exchange between sodium ions in sodium alginate and silver ions in silver nitrate and in situ reduction. The nanofibers exhibit good humidity response characteristics at 20% ambient relative humidity to 85% ambient relative humidity. Place it on the mask to monitor the depth and frequency of breathing, and even to distinguish between breathing in joy and sadness, as shown in Figs. 8(a)8(d)[18]. This will play a big role in the direction of the interactive system. The sensor monitors breathing during sleep and clearly distinguishes between normal (NB) and hard to breathe (HB) states, providing an alarm and timely assistance during apnea, as shown in Figs. 8(e) and 8(f)[18].

Figure  8.  (Color online) (a) Photo of the mask combined with the sensor. (b) Response in normal and running state. (c) Response in joy state. (d) Response in sad state. (e) Response in sleep state. (f) Response in normal breathing (NB) and hard to breathe (HB) conditions[18].

Nano-generators can convert small-scale environmental energy into electrical energy, and self-powered systems based on nano-generators will be a good choice for reducing the size of electronic devices. On the other hand, the strength of the output signal of the nanogenerator is related to pressure and temperature, and can be used as a self-powered sensor. Due to its portability and self-powered features, there are many applications in the field of wearable devices. You et al.[5] prepared a hybrid nano-generator based on electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). The nanogenerator has both piezoelectric and pyroelectric output characteristics, and outputs a corresponding signal when the temperature and pressure changes. Moreover, the piezoelectric and pyroelectric signals do not affect each other, but the superimposed output, as shown in Fig. 9[5]. Wang et al.[32] adopted a single-electrode configuration to further increase the portability of the piezoelectric system and prepared a single-electrode electronic skin based on PVDF nanogenerator. It has not only piezoelectric and pyroelectric properties but also flexibility and transparency, as shown in Fig. 10. And this electronic skin is more stable and has good short circuit resistance, as shown in Fig. 11[32].

Figure  9.  (Color online) (a) Piezoelectric properties of PVDF under pressure. (b) Piezoelectric properties of PVDF during bending. (c) Pyroelectric characteristics of PVDF. (d) Mixed output of piezoelectric signals and pyroelectric signals of PVDF[5].
Figure  10.  (Color online) (a) Electronic skin map and wiring diagram. (b) Piezoelectric properties of electronic skin under pressure. (c) Piezoelectric properties of electronic skin during bending. (d) Pyroelectric characteristics of electronic skin[32].
Figure  11.  (Color online) (a) Pressure profile. (b) Temperature profile. (c) Output of electronic skin after short-circuit of adjacent components. (d) Output signal of direct short-circuit of resistor unit. (e) Output of resistor unit in short-circuit condition of adjacent components[32].

Guo et al.[33] added barium titanate (BaTiO3) to PVDF to improve the piezoelectric properties of PVDF. The PVDF/BaTiO3 nanofiber membrane was obtained by electrospinning BaTiO3 into a PVDF precursor solution. A wireless piezoelectric device was fabricated by combining a fiber membrane with a Bluetooth transmission device. The device has good sensitivity and can be used for human motion monitoring, as shown in Fig. 12[33]. Triboelectric nanogenerators (TENG) are also capable of converting external energy into electrical energy. Qiu et al.[34] prepared a highly sensitive triboelectric nanogenerator using PVDF and PA6 as functional layers to form an all-fabric TENG. It has an open circuit voltage of up to 1000 V and is not subject to interference from additional resistors. It monitors the patient's breathing and can transmit information through a finger click, as shown in Fig. 13[34].

Figure  12.  (Color online) (a) Bluetooth device schematic. (b) Software interface diagram. (c) Wireless signal when squatting. (d) Wireless signal while walking. (e) Wireless signal during running. (f) Effect of BaTiO3 content on piezoelectricity. (g) 3% BaTiO3 The piezoelectricity of the PVDF fiber membrane at different frequency impacts[33].
Figure  13.  (Color online) (a) Triboelectric nanogenerator structure diagram. (b) Open circuit voltage output. (c) Breathing output signal. (d) Finger click output signal[34].

Flexible sensors composed of conductive nanofibers exhibit outstanding performance. The large-scale and low-cost development of high-performance conductive nanomaterials will greatly promote the development of flexible sensors. Of course, electrospinning technology is an alternative solution. Electrospinning technology can control the fiber diameter and even produce fibers with a diameter of less than 1 nm[3537]. However, fine control of fiber diameter and preparation of fine nanofibers having a uniform diameter are still challenging. In order to further improve the electrical conductivity of the electrospun fiber, the combination of the electrospinning technology and other conductor preparation methods will have a better development prospect. Flexible sensors have been applied to many areas of electronic devices, with the health care field being the most compelling. This wearable sensor for health and motion monitoring will improve people's lifestyles. In addition, with the development of Internet of Things technology, the smart home field has also shown good development prospects.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51673103 and 51973100).



[1]
Zheng J, Long Y Z, Sun B, et al. Polymer nanofibers prepared by low-voltage near-field electrospinning. Chin Phys B, 2012, 21(4), 048102 doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/21/4/048102
[2]
Zheng J, Sun B, Long Y Z, et al. Fabrication of nanofibers by low-voltage near-field electrospinning. Adv Mater Res, 2012, 486, 60 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.486.60
[3]
He X X, Zheng J, Yu G F, et al. Near-field electrospinning: progress and applications. J Phys Chem C, 2017, 121(16), 8663 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12783
[4]
Si W Y, Zhang H D, Liu Y J, et al. Fabrication and pressure sensing analysis of ZnO/PVDF composite microfiber arrays by low-voltage near-field electrospinning. Chem J Chin Univ-Chin, 2017, 38(6), 997 doi: 10.7503/cjcu20160847
[5]
You M H, Wang X X, Yan X, et al. A self-powered flexible hybrid piezoelectric-pyroelectric nanogenerator based on non-woven nanofiber membranes. J Mater Chem A, 2018, 6(8), 3500 doi: 10.1039/C7TA10175A
[6]
Sui J X, Wang X X, Song C, et al. Preparation and low-temperature electrical and magnetic properties of La0.33Pr0.34Ca0.33MnO3 nanofibers via electrospinning. J Magnet Magnet Mater, 2018, 467, 74 doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.07.060
[7]
Shen H, Li L, Xu D. Preparation of one-dimensional SnO2–In2O3 nano-heterostructures and their gas-sensing property. RSC Adv, 2017, 7(53), 33098 doi: 10.1039/C6RA28520A
[8]
Chen S, Long Y Z, Zhang H D, et al. Fabrication of ultrathin In2O3 hollow fibers for UV light sensing. Phys Scrip, 2014, 89(11), 115808 doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/89/11/115808
[9]
Chen S, Yu M, Han W P, et al. Electrospun anatase TiO2 nanorods for flexible optoelectronic devices. Rsc Adv, 2014, 4(86), 46152 doi: 10.1039/C4RA07943D
[10]
You M H, Yan X, Zhang J, et al. Colorimetric humidity sensors based on electrospun polyamide/CoCl2 nanofibrous membranes. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2017, 12, 360 doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2139-0
[11]
Pyo J Y, Cho W J. In-plane-gate a-IGZO thin-film transistor for high-sensitivity pH sensor applications. Sens Actuators B, 2018, 276, 101 doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.08.087
[12]
Li S, Zhang J, Ju D D, et al. Flexible inorganic composite nanofibers with carboxyl modification for controllable drug delivery and enhanced optical monitoring functionality. Chem Eng J, 2018, 350, 645 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.166
[13]
Zhang J, Li S, Ju D D, et al. Flexible inorganic core-shell nanofibers endowed with tunable multicolor upconversion fluorescence for simultaneous monitoring dual drug delivery. Chem Eng J, 2018, 349, 554 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.112
[14]
Chen S, Liu G S, He H W, et al. Physical structure induced hydrophobicity analyzed from electrospinning and coating polyvinyl butyral films. Adv Conden Matter Phys, 2019, 2019, 6179456 doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6179456
[15]
Liu G S, Yan X, Yan F F, et al. In situ electrospinning iodine-based fibrous meshes for antibacterial wound dressing. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2018, 13(1), 309 doi: 10.1186/s11671-018-2733-9
[16]
Yan X, Yu M, Ramakrishna S, et al. Advances in portable electrospinning devices for in situ delivery of personalized wound care. Nanoscale, 2019 doi: 10.1039/C9NR02802A
[17]
Liu H, Zhang Z G, Wang X X, et al. Highly flexible Fe2O3/TiO2 composite nanofibers for photocatalysis and utraviolet detection. J Phys Chem Solids, 2018, 121, 236 doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.05.019
[18]
Zhang J, Wang X X, B Zhang B, et al. In situ assembly of well-dispersed Ag nanoparticles throughout electrospun alginate nanofibers for monitoring human breath-smart fabrics. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10(23), 19863 doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b01718
[19]
Zhang H D, Yu M, Zhang J C, et al. Fabrication and photoelectric properties of La-doped p-type ZnO nanofibers and crossed p–n homojunctions by electrospinning. Nanoscale, 2015, 7(23), 10513 doi: 10.1039/C5NR02191J
[20]
Liu S, L Liu S L, Long Y Z, et al. Fabrication of p-type ZnO nanofibers by electrospinning for field-effect and rectifying devices. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 104(4), 042105 doi: 10.1063/1.4863409
[21]
Liu Y J, Zhang H D, Zhang J, et al. Effects of Ce doping and humidity on UV sensing properties of electrospun ZnO nanofibers. J Appl Phys, 2017, 122(10), 105102 doi: 10.1063/1.5000443
[22]
Liu X, Gu L L, Zhang Q P, et al. All-printable band-edge modulated ZnO nanowire photodetectors with ultra-high detectivity. Nat Commun, 2014, 5, 4007 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5007
[23]
Zhang H D, Liu Y J, Zhang J, et al. Electrospun ZnO/SiO2 hybrid nanofibers for flexible pressure sensor. J Phys D, 2018, 51(8), 085102 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aaa82d
[24]
Tong L, Wang X X, He X X, et al. Electrically conductive TPU nanofibrous composite with high stretchability for flexible strain sensor. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2018, 13, 86 doi: 10.1186/s11671-018-2499-0
[25]
Yu G F, Yan X, Yu M, et al. Patterned, highly stretchable and conductive nanofibrous PANI/PVDF strain sensors based on electrospinning and in situ polymerization. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(5), 2944 doi: 10.1039/C5NR08618C
[26]
Hu W P, Zhang B, Zhang J, et al. Ag/alginate nanofiber membrane for flexible electronic skin. Nanotechnology, 2017, 28(44), 445502 doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa8746
[27]
Zhang H D, Long Y Z, Li Z J, et al. Fabrication of comb-like ZnO nanostructures for room-temperature CO gas sensing application. Vacuum, 2014, 101, 113 doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2013.07.046
[28]
Zhang H D, Yan X, Zhang Z H, et al. Electrospun PEDOT:PSS/PVP nanofibers for CO gas sensing with quartz crystal microbalance technique. Int J Polym Sci, 2016, 2016, 3021353 doi: 10.1155/2016/3021353
[29]
Zhang H D, Tang C C, Long Y Z, et al. High-sensitivity gas sensors based on arranged polyaniline/PMMA composite fibers. Sens Actuators A, 2014, 219, 123 doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2014.09.005
[30]
Sheng C H, Zhang H D, S Chen S, et al. Fabrication, structural and humidity sensing properties of BaTiO3 nanofibers via electrospinning. Int J Modern Phys B, 2015, 29(12), 1550066 doi: 10.1142/S0217979215500666
[31]
Zhang Q Q, Wang X X, J Fu J, et al. Electrospinning of ultrafine conducting polymer composite nanofibers with diameter less than 70 nm as high sensitive gas sensor. Materials, 2018, 11(9), 1744 doi: 10.3390/ma11091744
[32]
Wang X X, Song W Z, You M H, et al. Bionic single-electrode electronic skin unit based on piezoelectric nanogenerator. Acs Nano, 2018, 12(8), 8588 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b04244
[33]
Guo W Z, Tan C X, Shi K M, et al. Wireless piezoelectric devices based on electrospun PVDF/BaTiO3 NW nanocomposite fibers for human motion monitoring. Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 17751 doi: 10.1039/C8NR05292A
[34]
Qiu H J, Song W Z, Wang X X, et al. A calibration-free self-powered sensor for vital sign monitoring and finger tap communication based on wearable triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy, 2019, 58, 536 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.069
[35]
Huang C, Chen S, Lai C, et al. Electrospun polymer nanofibres with small diameters. Nanotechnology, 2006, 17(6), 1558 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/17/6/004
[36]
Yang R, He J, Xu L, et al. Bubble-electrospinning for fabricating nanofibers. Polymer, 2009, 50(24), 5846 doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.10.021
[37]
Jian S, Zhu J, Jiang S, et al. Nanofibers with diameter below one nanometer from electrospinning. RSC Adv, 2018, 8(9), 4794 doi: 10.1039/C7RA13444D
Fig. 1.  (Color online) (a) Flowchart for preparing conductive nanofibers by surface modification[18]. (b) Flowchart for preparing conductive nanofibers by heat treatment[17].

Fig. 2.  (Color online) (a) Schematic diagram of field effect test device for zinc oxide fiber. (b) Field effect characteristics of Ce-doped ZnO[21]. (c) IV curve of La-doped ZnO at different irradiation intensities. (d) Field effect characteristics of La-doped ZnO[19].

Fig. 3.  (Color online) (a) Schematic of the printing unit. (b) Time-domain optical response of the ZnO fiber array. (c) IV curve of the ZnO fiber array. (d) Flexible photodetector. (e) Optical photo of the nanowire array and silver electrode with a scale of 30 microns[22].

Fig. 4.  (Color online) (a) IV curves for PANI/TPU sensors under different tensions. (b) Responses when fingers are bent[24]. (c–f) Fibers with different patterned collectors[25].

Fig. 5.  (Color online) (a) Electrical performance of the sensor at different pressures. (b) Current change of the sensor at different pressures. (c) Response of the sensor to human respiration. (d) Response of the sensor to “Nano” and “Perfect”. (e) Electrode array diagram. (f) Pressure distribution[26].

Fig. 6.  (Color online) (a) PEDOT:PSS/PVP composite nanofibers response to CO. (b) PEDOT:PSS/PVP composite nanofibers response to different concentrations of CO[28]. (c) Polyaniline/PMMA nanofibers in response to different concentrations of ammonia. (d) Sensitivity of polyaniline/PMMA nanofibers[29]. (e) Humidity response of BaTiO3 fiber. (f) Recovery performance of BaTiO3 fiber[30].

Fig. 7.  (Color online) (a) SEM image of ultrafine fiber. (b) Particle size distribution of ultrafine fiber. (c, d) Ammonia response curve of traditional electrospun fiber. (e, f) Ammonia response curve of microfiber[31].

Fig. 8.  (Color online) (a) Photo of the mask combined with the sensor. (b) Response in normal and running state. (c) Response in joy state. (d) Response in sad state. (e) Response in sleep state. (f) Response in normal breathing (NB) and hard to breathe (HB) conditions[18].

Fig. 9.  (Color online) (a) Piezoelectric properties of PVDF under pressure. (b) Piezoelectric properties of PVDF during bending. (c) Pyroelectric characteristics of PVDF. (d) Mixed output of piezoelectric signals and pyroelectric signals of PVDF[5].

Fig. 10.  (Color online) (a) Electronic skin map and wiring diagram. (b) Piezoelectric properties of electronic skin under pressure. (c) Piezoelectric properties of electronic skin during bending. (d) Pyroelectric characteristics of electronic skin[32].

Fig. 11.  (Color online) (a) Pressure profile. (b) Temperature profile. (c) Output of electronic skin after short-circuit of adjacent components. (d) Output signal of direct short-circuit of resistor unit. (e) Output of resistor unit in short-circuit condition of adjacent components[32].

Fig. 12.  (Color online) (a) Bluetooth device schematic. (b) Software interface diagram. (c) Wireless signal when squatting. (d) Wireless signal while walking. (e) Wireless signal during running. (f) Effect of BaTiO3 content on piezoelectricity. (g) 3% BaTiO3 The piezoelectricity of the PVDF fiber membrane at different frequency impacts[33].

Fig. 13.  (Color online) (a) Triboelectric nanogenerator structure diagram. (b) Open circuit voltage output. (c) Breathing output signal. (d) Finger click output signal[34].

[1]
Zheng J, Long Y Z, Sun B, et al. Polymer nanofibers prepared by low-voltage near-field electrospinning. Chin Phys B, 2012, 21(4), 048102 doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/21/4/048102
[2]
Zheng J, Sun B, Long Y Z, et al. Fabrication of nanofibers by low-voltage near-field electrospinning. Adv Mater Res, 2012, 486, 60 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.486.60
[3]
He X X, Zheng J, Yu G F, et al. Near-field electrospinning: progress and applications. J Phys Chem C, 2017, 121(16), 8663 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12783
[4]
Si W Y, Zhang H D, Liu Y J, et al. Fabrication and pressure sensing analysis of ZnO/PVDF composite microfiber arrays by low-voltage near-field electrospinning. Chem J Chin Univ-Chin, 2017, 38(6), 997 doi: 10.7503/cjcu20160847
[5]
You M H, Wang X X, Yan X, et al. A self-powered flexible hybrid piezoelectric-pyroelectric nanogenerator based on non-woven nanofiber membranes. J Mater Chem A, 2018, 6(8), 3500 doi: 10.1039/C7TA10175A
[6]
Sui J X, Wang X X, Song C, et al. Preparation and low-temperature electrical and magnetic properties of La0.33Pr0.34Ca0.33MnO3 nanofibers via electrospinning. J Magnet Magnet Mater, 2018, 467, 74 doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.07.060
[7]
Shen H, Li L, Xu D. Preparation of one-dimensional SnO2–In2O3 nano-heterostructures and their gas-sensing property. RSC Adv, 2017, 7(53), 33098 doi: 10.1039/C6RA28520A
[8]
Chen S, Long Y Z, Zhang H D, et al. Fabrication of ultrathin In2O3 hollow fibers for UV light sensing. Phys Scrip, 2014, 89(11), 115808 doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/89/11/115808
[9]
Chen S, Yu M, Han W P, et al. Electrospun anatase TiO2 nanorods for flexible optoelectronic devices. Rsc Adv, 2014, 4(86), 46152 doi: 10.1039/C4RA07943D
[10]
You M H, Yan X, Zhang J, et al. Colorimetric humidity sensors based on electrospun polyamide/CoCl2 nanofibrous membranes. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2017, 12, 360 doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2139-0
[11]
Pyo J Y, Cho W J. In-plane-gate a-IGZO thin-film transistor for high-sensitivity pH sensor applications. Sens Actuators B, 2018, 276, 101 doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.08.087
[12]
Li S, Zhang J, Ju D D, et al. Flexible inorganic composite nanofibers with carboxyl modification for controllable drug delivery and enhanced optical monitoring functionality. Chem Eng J, 2018, 350, 645 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.166
[13]
Zhang J, Li S, Ju D D, et al. Flexible inorganic core-shell nanofibers endowed with tunable multicolor upconversion fluorescence for simultaneous monitoring dual drug delivery. Chem Eng J, 2018, 349, 554 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.112
[14]
Chen S, Liu G S, He H W, et al. Physical structure induced hydrophobicity analyzed from electrospinning and coating polyvinyl butyral films. Adv Conden Matter Phys, 2019, 2019, 6179456 doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6179456
[15]
Liu G S, Yan X, Yan F F, et al. In situ electrospinning iodine-based fibrous meshes for antibacterial wound dressing. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2018, 13(1), 309 doi: 10.1186/s11671-018-2733-9
[16]
Yan X, Yu M, Ramakrishna S, et al. Advances in portable electrospinning devices for in situ delivery of personalized wound care. Nanoscale, 2019 doi: 10.1039/C9NR02802A
[17]
Liu H, Zhang Z G, Wang X X, et al. Highly flexible Fe2O3/TiO2 composite nanofibers for photocatalysis and utraviolet detection. J Phys Chem Solids, 2018, 121, 236 doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.05.019
[18]
Zhang J, Wang X X, B Zhang B, et al. In situ assembly of well-dispersed Ag nanoparticles throughout electrospun alginate nanofibers for monitoring human breath-smart fabrics. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10(23), 19863 doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b01718
[19]
Zhang H D, Yu M, Zhang J C, et al. Fabrication and photoelectric properties of La-doped p-type ZnO nanofibers and crossed p–n homojunctions by electrospinning. Nanoscale, 2015, 7(23), 10513 doi: 10.1039/C5NR02191J
[20]
Liu S, L Liu S L, Long Y Z, et al. Fabrication of p-type ZnO nanofibers by electrospinning for field-effect and rectifying devices. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 104(4), 042105 doi: 10.1063/1.4863409
[21]
Liu Y J, Zhang H D, Zhang J, et al. Effects of Ce doping and humidity on UV sensing properties of electrospun ZnO nanofibers. J Appl Phys, 2017, 122(10), 105102 doi: 10.1063/1.5000443
[22]
Liu X, Gu L L, Zhang Q P, et al. All-printable band-edge modulated ZnO nanowire photodetectors with ultra-high detectivity. Nat Commun, 2014, 5, 4007 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5007
[23]
Zhang H D, Liu Y J, Zhang J, et al. Electrospun ZnO/SiO2 hybrid nanofibers for flexible pressure sensor. J Phys D, 2018, 51(8), 085102 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aaa82d
[24]
Tong L, Wang X X, He X X, et al. Electrically conductive TPU nanofibrous composite with high stretchability for flexible strain sensor. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2018, 13, 86 doi: 10.1186/s11671-018-2499-0
[25]
Yu G F, Yan X, Yu M, et al. Patterned, highly stretchable and conductive nanofibrous PANI/PVDF strain sensors based on electrospinning and in situ polymerization. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(5), 2944 doi: 10.1039/C5NR08618C
[26]
Hu W P, Zhang B, Zhang J, et al. Ag/alginate nanofiber membrane for flexible electronic skin. Nanotechnology, 2017, 28(44), 445502 doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa8746
[27]
Zhang H D, Long Y Z, Li Z J, et al. Fabrication of comb-like ZnO nanostructures for room-temperature CO gas sensing application. Vacuum, 2014, 101, 113 doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2013.07.046
[28]
Zhang H D, Yan X, Zhang Z H, et al. Electrospun PEDOT:PSS/PVP nanofibers for CO gas sensing with quartz crystal microbalance technique. Int J Polym Sci, 2016, 2016, 3021353 doi: 10.1155/2016/3021353
[29]
Zhang H D, Tang C C, Long Y Z, et al. High-sensitivity gas sensors based on arranged polyaniline/PMMA composite fibers. Sens Actuators A, 2014, 219, 123 doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2014.09.005
[30]
Sheng C H, Zhang H D, S Chen S, et al. Fabrication, structural and humidity sensing properties of BaTiO3 nanofibers via electrospinning. Int J Modern Phys B, 2015, 29(12), 1550066 doi: 10.1142/S0217979215500666
[31]
Zhang Q Q, Wang X X, J Fu J, et al. Electrospinning of ultrafine conducting polymer composite nanofibers with diameter less than 70 nm as high sensitive gas sensor. Materials, 2018, 11(9), 1744 doi: 10.3390/ma11091744
[32]
Wang X X, Song W Z, You M H, et al. Bionic single-electrode electronic skin unit based on piezoelectric nanogenerator. Acs Nano, 2018, 12(8), 8588 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b04244
[33]
Guo W Z, Tan C X, Shi K M, et al. Wireless piezoelectric devices based on electrospun PVDF/BaTiO3 NW nanocomposite fibers for human motion monitoring. Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 17751 doi: 10.1039/C8NR05292A
[34]
Qiu H J, Song W Z, Wang X X, et al. A calibration-free self-powered sensor for vital sign monitoring and finger tap communication based on wearable triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy, 2019, 58, 536 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.069
[35]
Huang C, Chen S, Lai C, et al. Electrospun polymer nanofibres with small diameters. Nanotechnology, 2006, 17(6), 1558 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/17/6/004
[36]
Yang R, He J, Xu L, et al. Bubble-electrospinning for fabricating nanofibers. Polymer, 2009, 50(24), 5846 doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.10.021
[37]
Jian S, Zhu J, Jiang S, et al. Nanofibers with diameter below one nanometer from electrospinning. RSC Adv, 2018, 8(9), 4794 doi: 10.1039/C7RA13444D
1

Recent progress on artificial intelligence-enhanced multimodal sensors integrated devices and systems

Haihua Wang, Mingjian Zhou, Xiaolong Jia, Hualong Wei, Zhenjie Hu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2025, 46(1): 011610. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24090041

2

Microcantilever sensors for biochemical detection

Jingjing Wang, Baozheng Xu, Yinfang Zhu, Junyuan Zhao

Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(2): 023105. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/2/023105

3

Highly-rough surface carbon nanofibers film as an effective interlayer for lithium–sulfur batteries

Hongfan Zhu, Mo Sha, Huaping Zhao, Yuting Nie, Xuhui Sun, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2020, 41(9): 092701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/9/092701

4

Engineering in-plane silicon nanowire springs for highly stretchable electronics

Zhaoguo Xue, Taige Dong, Zhimin Zhu, Yaolong Zhao, Ying Sun, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(1): 011001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/1/011001

5

Hybrid functional microfibers for textile electronics and biosensors

Bichitra Nanda Sahoo, Byungwoo Choi, Jungmok Seo, Taeyoon Lee

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(1): 011009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/1/011009

6

Mesoporous tin oxide nanospheres for a NOx in air sensor

Haonan Zhang, Ming Zhuo, Yazi Luo, Yuejiao Chen

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(2): 023003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/2/023003

7

Surface acoustic wave devices for sensor applications

Bo Liu, Xiao Chen, Hualin Cai, Mohammad Ali Mohammad, Xiangguang Tian, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(2): 021001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/2/021001

8

A trimming technique for capacitive SAR ADC as sensor interface

Ke Liu, Zhankun Du, Li Shao, Xiao Ma

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(12): 125004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/12/125004

9

Sensitivity enhancement of OD- and OD-CNT-based humidity sensors by high gravity thin film deposition technique

Kh. S. Karimov, Noshin Fatima, Khaulah Sulaiman, M. Mahroof Tahir, Zubair Ahmad, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(3): 034005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/3/034005

10

Effects of defects on the electronic properties of WTe2 armchair nanoribbons

Bahniman Ghosh, Abhishek Gupta, Bhupesh Bishnoi

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 113002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113002

11

Toluene-sensing properties of In2O3 nanotubes synthesized by electrospinning

Xiao Chi, Changbai Liu, Jinbao Zhang, Li Liu, Haiying Li, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(6): 064005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/6/064005

12

In situ TEM/SEM electronic/mechanical characterization of nano material with MEMS chip

Yuelin Wang, Tie Li, Xiao Zhang, Hongjiang Zeng, Qinhua Jin, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(8): 081001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/8/081001

13

Acetic acid gas sensors based on Ni2+ doped ZnO nanorods prepared by using the solvothermal method

Cheng Zhiming, Zhou Sumei, Chen Tongyun, Dong Yongping, Zhang Wangbing, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(11): 112003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/11/112003

14

Characterization of vanadyl phthalocyanine based surface-type capacitive humidity sensors

Fakhra Aziz, M. H. Sayyad, Khassan S. Karimov, M. Saleem, Zubair Ahmad, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(11): 114002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/11/114002

15

A novel SOI MOSFET electrostatic field sensor

Chen Xin'an, Huang Qing'an

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(4): 045003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/4/045003

16

Working mechanism of a SiC nanotube NO2 gas sensor

Ding Ruixue, Yang Yintang, Liu Lianxi

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(11): 114010. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/11/114010

17

Electronic Structure of Semiconductor Nanocrystals

Li Jingbo, Wang Linwang, Wei Suhuai

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 191-196.

18

Quantum and Transport Mobilities of a Two-Dimensional Electron Gas in the Presence of the Rashba Spin-Orbit Interaction

Xu Wen

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 204-217.

19

Design and Optimization of SOI Piezoresistive MicrocantileverSensors for Use in Surface Stress Measurement

Zhuang Zhiwei, Wang Zheyao, Liu Litian

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(10): 1844-1850.

20

High-Integrated-Photosensitivity Negative-Electron-Affinity GaAs Photocathodes with Multilayer Be-Doping Structures

Wang Xiaofeng, Zeng Yiping, Wang Baoqiang, Zhu Zhanping, Du Xiaoqing, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(9): 1692-1698.

1. Ghorbanizamani, F., Moulahoum, H., Timur, S. MXene-poly(propylene carbonate) nanofiber network-based modification of SPE interfaces for electrochemical immuno-sensing of synthetic cannabinoid. Talanta, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2025.127687
2. Zhao, W., He, P., Ling, K. et al. Printed graphene/CNTs/TPU-fabric wearable strain sensor for healthcare monitoring. Soft Science, 2025, 5(1): 10. doi:10.20517/ss.2024.61
3. Batka, O., Skrivanek, J., Beran, J. Optimizing the Shape of the Spinning Electrode for Needleless Coaxial Electrospinning. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 2024, 14(11): 4638. doi:10.3390/app14114638
4. Liu, K., Zhang, P., Müller-Buschbaum, P. et al. Enhanced UV protection in silk fibroin based electrospun fabrics realized via orientation induced high efficiency of azobenzene isomerization. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131638
5. Shi, S., Abbas, Z., Zhao, X. et al. Deposition of Uniform Nanoscale Patterns on Silicon Dioxide Based on Coaxial Jet Direct Writing. Polymers, 2023, 15(18): 3702. doi:10.3390/polym15183702
6. Li, Z., Hou, Y., Ma, Y. et al. Recent advances in one-dimensional electrospun semiconductor nanostructures for UV photodetector applications: A review. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169718
7. Yang, Y., Yi, T., Liu, Y. et al. Design of a Highly Sensitive Reduced Graphene Oxide/Graphene Oxide@Cellulose Acetate/Thermoplastic Polyurethane Flexible Sensor. Sensors, 2022, 22(9): 3281. doi:10.3390/s22093281
8. Rajesh, R.. Electron density distribution influencing the electrical and magnetic properties of polycrystalline Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3ceramics. International Journal of Materials Research, 2022, 113(4): 278-286. doi:10.1515/ijmr-2021-8339
9. Wang, Y., Yokota, T., Someya, T. Electrospun nanofiber-based soft electronics. NPG Asia Materials, 2021, 13(1): 22. doi:10.1038/s41427-020-00267-8
10. Li, L., Wang, D., Zhang, D. et al. Near-Infrared Light Triggered Self-Powered Mechano-Optical Communication System using Wearable Photodetector Textile. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(37): 2104782. doi:10.1002/adfm.202104782
11. Gois, B.H.S., Bittencourt, J.C., David-Parra, D.N. et al. Electrospun ppy.dbsa/pva nanofibers for ammonium gas sensor. Materials Research, 2021. doi:10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2021-0031
12. Yan, K., Li, X., Wang, X.-X. et al. A non-toxic triboelectric nanogenerator for baby care applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2020, 8(43): 22745-22753. doi:10.1039/d0ta08909e
13. Zhang, J., Xue, W., Chen, X.-Y. et al. Sm doped BiFeO3 nanofibers for improved photovoltaic devices. Chinese Journal of Physics, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2020.03.021
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Qi Liu, Seeram Ramakrishna, Yun-Ze Long. Electrospun flexible sensor[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(11): 111603. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/11/111603
    Q Liu, S Ramakrishna, Y Z Long, Electrospun flexible sensor[J]. J. Semicond., 2019, 40(11): 111603. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/11/111603.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 4732 Times PDF downloads: 74 Times Cited by: 13 Times

    History

    Received: 16 August 2019 Revised: Online: Accepted Manuscript: 23 September 2019Uncorrected proof: 24 September 2019Published: 08 November 2019

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Qi Liu, Seeram Ramakrishna, Yun-Ze Long. Electrospun flexible sensor[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(11): 111603. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/11/111603 ****Q Liu, S Ramakrishna, Y Z Long, Electrospun flexible sensor[J]. J. Semicond., 2019, 40(11): 111603. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/11/111603.
      Citation:
      Qi Liu, Seeram Ramakrishna, Yun-Ze Long. Electrospun flexible sensor[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(11): 111603. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/11/111603 ****
      Q Liu, S Ramakrishna, Y Z Long, Electrospun flexible sensor[J]. J. Semicond., 2019, 40(11): 111603. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/11/111603.

      Electrospun flexible sensor

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/11/111603
      More Information
      • Corresponding author: E-mail: yunze.long@163.com or yunze.long@qdu.edu.cn
      • Received Date: 2019-08-16
      • Published Date: 2019-11-01

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return