Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2021, Volume 42 > Issue 11 > 112102

ARTICLES

Direct calculations on the band offsets of large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent Si and III–V semiconductors

Yuying Hu1, 2, Chen Qiu1, Tao Shen1, 2, Kaike Yang3 and Huixiong Deng1, 2,

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Huixiong Deng, hxdeng@semi.ac.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112102

PDF

Turn off MathJax

Abstract: Band offset in semiconductors is a fundamental physical quantity that determines the performance of optoelectronic devices. However, the current method of calculating band offset is difficult to apply directly to the large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent semiconductors because of the existing electric field and large strain at the interfaces. Here, we proposed a modified method to calculate band offsets for such systems, in which the core energy level shifts caused by heterovalent effects and lattice mismatch are estimated by interface reconstruction and the insertion of unidirectional strain structures as transitions, respectively. Taking the Si and III–V systems as examples, the results have the same accuracy as what is a widely used method for small-lattice-mismatched systems, and are much closer to the experimental values for the large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent systems. Furthermore, by systematically studying the heterojunctions of Si and III–V semiconductors along different directions, it is found that the band offsets of Si/InAs and Si/InSb systems in [100], [110] and [111] directions belong to the type I, and could be beneficial for silicon-based luminescence performance. Our study offers a more reliable and direct method for calculating band offsets of large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent semiconductors, and could provide theoretical support for the design of the high-performance silicon-based light sources.

Key words: Si-based luminescenceband offsetlattice mismatchheterovalent semiconductors

As the size of transistors continues to shrink, there is an urgent need to replace traditional electrical interconnects with Si-based optical interconnects that have the advantages of fast transmission speed, high bandwidth, and multiplexability to boost computer performances[1-8]. Growing III–V semiconductors on silicon is a promising method for realizing Si-based light sources because III–V materials have excellent luminescence properties due to their direct bandgap[1, 6-8]. Currently, room temperature excitation of a Si-based III–V laser has been achieved by Liu et al.[9] and Bowers et al.[10]. To further improve the luminescence efficiency, we can focus on band offset, which largely determines the interfacial charge transfer and quantum confinement. If the carriers in the heterojunction are confined to the III–V semiconductors, it is beneficial to give full play to their advantages in luminescence.

However, unlike isovalent superlattices and alloys[11], the Si and III–V semiconductors belong to different group semiconductors, and have different valence electrons (heterovalent). Therefore, the electric field at the interfaces could exist when they touch each other[12], which could significantly affect the band offset. On the other hand, there is large lattice mismatch between Si and some III–V semiconductors and inevitably a large strain at the interfaces. These reasons make calculating the band offset of Si and III–V semiconductors difficult and challenging, and sometimes lead to the inconsistencies between experimental observations and theoretical predictions[13-16]. For example, the excellent luminescent performance of InAs makes it have great potential to become a candidate material for future optoelectronic applications. However, the band offset type of Si/InAs has always been controversial[13-16]. Experimentally, Mano et al.[13] believed that the band offset of Si/InAs is the type-I, while Heitz et al.[14] found that it belongs to the type-II. Theoretically, Tersoff et al.[15] believed that the band offset of Si/InAs is the type-I, while Bru-Chevallier et al.[16] reported that it belongs to the type-II. The reason for this controversy is probably due to these two kinds of semiconductors having a large lattice mismatch and heterovalence-induced electric field, which should be particularly and reasonably considered for the band offset predictions for the large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent Si and III–V semiconductors.

Over the years, some models have been proposed and try to overcome the above problems, mainly by adding deformation potential to remove the influence of strain on energy levels. For example, Van de Walle et al.[11] modified the calculation of the band offset by including the effect of strain on the band edge state. This method focuses on iso-valent and isostructural cubic semiconductors, so caution for this method should be taken in the calculations of heterovalent materials. Li et al.[17] calculated the deformation value of the valence band between experimental crystal and average crystal through absolute deformation potential. However, since the absolute deformation potential is related to volume, this method is only useful in certain cases with small lattice mismatch. Lang et al.[18] proposed a three-step method for band offset calculation for lattice-mismatched and isovalent systems. By considering the interfacial reconstructions for eliminating the electric field in the superlattices, Deng et al. calculated band alignment of lattice-matched and heterovalent II–VI/III–V semiconductors[12]. However, so far the direct calculation of the band offset for heterovalent Si/III–V systems with large lattice mismatch is lacking.

In this paper, we present a modified, and reliable method for calculating the band offset of large lattice mismatch and heterovalent semiconductors, and simultaneously apply this to the calculations of band offsets of Si/III–V systems. We found that our proposed approach has the same accuracy as the widely used modified core level method for systems with small lattice mismatch. Moreover, the calculated results are much closer to the experimental values of the large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent systems.

The calculations were performed using density functional theory[19, 20] with the local density approximation (LDA)[21] for the exchange-correlation functionals as implemented in the Vienna ab-initio simulation package (VASP)[22]. The cutoff energy for the plane-wave basis was 450 eV, and dense k-point sampling was used in each case to ensure fully converged results. All atoms were relaxed until the Hellman–Feynman forces on individual atoms were less than 0.01 eV/Å. All calculations were performed at the equilibrium (experimental) lattice constants[23].

The valence band offset is usually calculated as follows[24]. If the two semiconductors are represented by AX and BY respectively, the valence band offset is expressed as:

ΔEv(AX/BY)=ΔEBYv,CΔEAXv,C+ΔEAX/BYC,C. (1)

Here ΔEAXv,C=EAXvEAXC represents the energy difference between the valence band maximum (VBM) and the core energy level of semiconductor AX at the equilibriumlattice, the as same for ΔEBYv,C. ΔEAX/BYC,C=ΔEBYCΔEAXC is the energy difference between the core levels of BY and AX in a relaxed heterojunction with the same reference level. The above method is reasonable only for band offset calculations of homovalent semiconductors with a small lattice mismatch[17]. We have improved the method to accommodate large-lattice-mismatched heterostructures. The specific steps for calculating the band offset of semiconductor AX and BY are given below.

(i) Bulk semiconductors of AX and BY. This step is to perform separate bulk calculations for two semiconductors AX and BY at their equilibrium lattice constant. The different ΔEAXv,C and ΔEBYv,C between Γ8v VBM state and core energy level in the two bulk materials is obtained by energy band calculations. In our calculations, we use the average of the cation and anion 1s core levels[17].

(ii) Alignment of core energy levels in heterojunctions. The purpose of this step is to align the core energy levels in isolated systems of AX and BY, and which is achieved through a five-step calculation, as proposed by the Lang et al.[18]. It should be noted in advance that we use (a1, a2, a3), (b1, b2, b3) to denote the lattice constants of AX and BY, respectively, and (c1, c2, c3) to denote the average of the lattice constants of both, c1=(a1+b1)/2, c2=(a2+b2)/2 and c3=(a3+b3)/2. AX, AX' and AX'' denote AX semiconductors at the experimental lattice, unidirectional strain lattice and bidirectional strain lattice, respectively, and the same for BY. Fig. 1 illustrates the five calculation steps using the [100] direction as an example. In the first step, a unidirectional strained semiconductor AX' with lattice constants (a1, c2, a3) is constructed and connected with AX along the (010) plane (lattice-matched interface) to form an (AX)n(AX')n superlattice. In the second step, a bidirectional strained semiconductor AX'' with lattice constants (a1, c2, c3) is constructed and connected with AX' along the (001) plane to form an (AX')n(AX'')n superlattice. In the third step, a bidirectional strained semiconductor BY'' with lattice constants (b1, c2, c3) is constructed and connected with AX'' along the (100) plane to form an (AX'')n(BY'')n superlattice. In the fourth step, a unidirectional strained semiconductor BY' with lattice constants (b1, c2, b3) is constructed and connected with BY'' along the (001) plane to form a (BY'')n(BY')n superlattice. In the fifth step, BY' is connected with BY along the (010) plane to form a (BY')n(BY)n superlattice. For all of these steps, the lattice constants in both directions forming the interface are lattice matched. It should be pointed out that the direction of unidirectional strain is not unique; it can be either of the two directions of the bidirectional strain. The calculation method for the heterojunction along [110] and [111] directions is the same. Finally, the core energy levels in the middle of the two sides of the superlattice[17, 24] (similar to the bulk material) are calculated to obtain the difference in the core energy levels of the two semiconductors at the equilibrium crystal[18].

Figure  1.  (Color online) Five steps for correcting the effect of lattice mismatch on valence band offset calculations using core energy levels as a reference.
ΔEAX/BYC,C=ΔEAX/AXC,C+ΔEAX/AXC,C+ΔEAX/BYC,C+ΔEBY/BYC,C+ΔEBY/BYC,C, (2)

where ΔEAX/AXC,C=EAXCEAXC represents the difference between the core energy levels of the equilibrium and unidirectional strain structures in AX semiconductors, and definitions of ΔEAX/AXC,C, ΔEAX/BYC,C, ΔEBY/BYC,C and ΔEBY/BYC,Care similar.

(iii) Reconstructed polarized interface. The purpose of this step is to reconstruct the interface to eliminate the internal electric field caused by the heterovalence in the polarized interface structures. When Si and III–V semiconductors form the heterojunction along the direction of [100] or [111], because they do not belong to the same group and the valence electrons are different, there is often a built-in electric field in the system[12, 25], which causes the energy levels of the system shifting, as shown in Fig. 3(a). Once the energy levels are shifted by the electric field, the resulting core energy levels will be meaningless. According to our previous research[12], the anion or cation atoms of the interface are mixed to form the mixed structures that are able to effectively elimante the internal electric field. In such structures, the excess charge carriers compensate each other at the interface, and there is no built-in electric field in the heterojunction. After calculating the difference between the core energy levels of the mixed cation and mixed anion structures, the valence band offset of these two bidirectional strain systems is obtained according to the Eqs. (1) and (2), and the average of the two is taken as the band offset in the requested direction. The superlattice formed along the [110] direction is not treated because it is nonpolar.

Figure  2.  (Color online) (a–e) show the five superlattice structures constructed. (a) Equilibrium-unidirectional superlattice of Si. (b) Unidirectional-bidirectional strain superlattice of Si. (c) Bidirectional strain superlattice of Si and InAs. (d) Bidirectional-unidirectional superlattice of InAs. (e) Unidirectional-equilibrium superlattice of InAs.

The valence band offsets of Si and III–V semiconductors with zincblende structure along [100], [110], and [111] directions have been calculated, respectively. We choose the Si/InAs superlattice as an example, which has a lattice mismatch of 11.60%. Fig. 2 shows the five constructed superlattice structures of Si and InAs along the [100] direction. They are the equilibrium-unidirectional strain superlattice of Si, the unidirectional-bidirectional strain superlattice of Si, the bidirectional strain superlattice of Si and InAs, the bidirectional-unidirectional strain superlattice of InAs, and the unidirectional strain-equilibrium superlattice of InAs, respectively.

Fig. 3 shows the elimination of the interface potential between Si and InAs. The abrupt interface refers to the interface directly connected by Si and InAs, and the mixed anion interface refers to the structure in which anions are mixed in the interface, and the mixed cation interface is the same. Fig. 3 clearly shows that the electrostatic potential at the abrupt interface is oblique, indicating the presence of a built-in electric field. When the interface atoms are mixed, the electrostatic potential becomes flat, indicating that the built-in electric field is eliminated successfully.

Figure  3.  (Color online) The abrupt interface, mixed cation interface and mixed anion interface formed by Si and InAs along the [100] direction, and the corresponding potential distribution along the growth orientation of the superlattices.

The calculated valence band offsets are shown in Table 1. First of all for the system with small lattice mismatch, we compared with previous theoretical calculations without considering strain and built-in electric field as well as with the experimental measurement and found almost no difference. For example, for Si/AlP systems with a lattice mismatch of 0.55%, the valence band offset in the [100] direction is calculated to be –0.88 eV in this paper, in agreement with the previous theoretical value of –0.91 eV[26]. For the Si/GaP system with a lattice mismatch of 0.37%, the valence band offset in the [100] direction is –0.28 eV, which also agrees with the previous theoretical value of –0.27 eV[26]. In addition, the value of –0.24 ± 0.12 eV[27] was measured experimentally for the valence band offset of the Si/GaP heterojunction, whose confidence interval contains the results of this study. This is due to the fact that our method is mainly used to revise the band offset of the large-mismatched system, and the core energy level of the small-mismatched system is less affected, so that the band offsets are comparable to the experimental value as well as to the value calculated by other theory.

Table  1.  Valence band offsets (in eV) of Si/III–V semiconductors with lattice mismatch and heterovalence along the orientation of [100], [110], [111], respectively. The lattice constants (in Å) of III–V semiconductors and mismatches (referred to the lattice constant of Si, e.g. 5.43 Å) are also given. The positive value represents that the position of the valence band of the III–V semiconductor is higher than that of Si.
SystemLattice constantMismatch
(%)
[100][110] abrupt[111]Exp.\Theo.
Mixed anionMixed cationAverageMixed anionMixed cationAverage
Si/AlP5.460.55–0.56–1.21–0.88–0.84–0.59–1.22–0.91–\–0.91i
Si/AlAs5.664.24–0.07–0.70–0.39–0.260.05–0.53–0.24–\–
Si/AlSb6.1413.080.310.260.280.520.370.410.39–\–
Si/GaN4.53–16.57–1.92–1.99–1.95–2.00–1.52–1.68–1.60–1.90ii\–
Si/GaP5.450.370.04–0.59–0.28–0.280.02–0.58–0.28–0.24±0.12iii
\–0.27i
Si/GaAs5.654.050.29–0.090.100.280.510.110.310.23±0.10iv \0.12v
Si/GaSb6.1012.340.410.260.340.620.360.270.31–\–
Si/InP5.878.100.10–0.27–0.080.250.430.070.250.12vi\0.36vii
Si/InAs6.0611.600.290.110.200.420.420.370.400.31viii\0.50vii
Si/InSb6.4819.340.160.140.150.730.220.240.230.06ix\0.25vii
i from Ref. [26]; ii from Ref. [28]; iii from Ref. [27]; iv from Ref. [29]; v from Ref. [30]; vi from Ref. [32]; vii from Ref. [31]; Viii from Ref. [13]; ix from Ref. [33].
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

For systems with a large lattice mismatch, the results obtained by our method are in good agreement with the experimental measurements. For example, for the Si/GaN system with lattice mismatch up to –16.57%, our calculated values are –1.95, –2.00, and –1.60 eV for the [100], [110], [111] directions, respectively, which are close to the experimental value of –1.90 eV[28]. For the Si/GaAs system with a lattice mismatch of 4.05%, our calculated value of 0.28 eV along the [110] direction is more consistent with the experimental value of 0.23 ± 0.10 eV[29] than the previously calculated result of 0.12 eV[30]. In the Si/InAs system with a lattice mismatch of about 11.60%, our calculated valence band offset along the [100] direction is 0.20 eV, which is closer to the experimental value of 0.31 eV[13] than the previous theoretical value of 0.50 eV[31]. In the Si/InP system with a lattice mismatch of about 8.10%, the previous theoretical work[32] shows a large difference of 0.24 eV compared with experimental value (0.12 eV[31]) along the [110] direction, while our result indicates this difference is only 0.13 eV, and has a smaller error. In summary, the valence band offsets calculated by the current method are significantly more consistent with the experimental measurements than the previous ones. For the Si/AlAs, Si/AlSb and Si/GaSb systems, since the valence band offsets have not been previously studied, we have performed calculations in the hope of providing some reference for the study of these materials.

Combining the valence band offset with the experimentally measured band gap[23] gives a clear picture of the carriers in Si/III–V semiconductor. Fig. 4 shows the band offsets of the Si/GaSb, Si/InAs, and Si/InSb systems along [100], [110], and [111] directions. Regarding the controversy about the band offset of the Si/InAs system mentioned in the previous section[13-16], the Si/InAs heterojunctions exhibit type I band offsets along [100], [110] and [111] directions because the energy minimum of the X-valley in the Si conduction band lies at a higher energy than the minimum of the Γ-valley in the InAs conduction band, as shown in Fig. 4. In such material systems, the recombination between electrons and holes is type I in both momentum and real space, and the photoluminescence efficiency is therefore expected to be high. This is also the situation for the band offsets along [100], [110] and [111] directions for the Si/InSb system and along [100] and [111] directions for the Si/GaSb system. Other band offsets of Si/III–V systems are either of the type I where the carriers are localized in Si, or of the type II where the electrons and holes are localized in Si and III–V semiconductors, respectively. These systems cannot exploit the great advantages of III–V materials in luminescence due to the involvement of phonons required for carrier compounding. Therefore, the Si/InAs and Si/InSb systems connected along three directions, and the Si/GaSb systems connected along [100] and [111] directions are the most promising systems for improving the luminescence efficiency of Si-based III–V semiconductor lasers from the perspective of the energy band structure.

Figure  4.  (Color online) Band offset diagram of the Si/GaSb, Si/InAs and Si/InSb systems with zinc-blende structure along the [100], [110], and [111] directions. The energy is relative to the vacuum level of Si.

We present a modified method for theoretically calculating the band offset of large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent semiconductors for the different directions based on the first-principles calculations. Using this method, the effect of interface reconstruction and lattice mismatch on band offsets is corrected by considering the reconstruction of the heterovalent interface and the inclusion of unidirectional strain crystals that play a transitional role between the equilibrium crystal structure and the bidirectional strain structure. Furthermore, we apply the method to calculate the band offsets of heterovalent Si and III–V semiconductors with large lattice mismatches in the [100], [110] and [111] directions. This research will provide some guidance for the selection of suitable light-source materials on the Si substrate from the perspective of energy band structure, and will be beneficial for the understanding and analysis of the properties of heterojunctions between the Si substrate and zincblende structured III–V semiconductors.

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB2200100), the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDPB22), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 118764347, 11614003, 11804333). H. X. D. was also supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 2017154).



[1]
Bioud Y A, Boucherif A, Myronov M, et al. Uprooting defects to enable high-performance III–V optoelectronic devices on silicon. Nat Commun, 2019, 10, 4322 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12353-9
[2]
Zacharias M, Kelires P C. Temperature dependence of the optical properties of silicon nanocrystals. Phys Rev B, 2020, 101(24), 245122 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.245122
[3]
Lu P, Li D, Cao Y, et al. Si nanocrystals-based multilayers for luminescent and photovoltaic device applications. J Semicond, 2018, 39(6), 061007 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/6/061007
[4]
Zhao S, Liu X, Pi X, et al. Light-emitting diodes based on colloidal silicon quantum dots. J Semicond, 2018, 39(6), 061008 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/6/061008
[5]
Zheng J, Liu Z, Xue C, et al. Recent progress in GeSn growth and GeSn-based photonic devices. J Semicond, 2018, 39(6), 061006 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/6/061006
[6]
Boras G, Yu X, Liu H. III–V ternary nanowires on Si substrates: growth, characterization and device applications. J Semicond, 2019, 40(10), 101301 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/10/101301
[7]
Zhang J, Yang X, Feng Y, et al. Vacancy-engineering-induced dislocation inclination in III-nitrides on Si substrates. Phys Rev Mater, 2020, 4(7), 073402 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.073402
[8]
Zhao C, Xu B, Wang Z, et al. Boron-doped III–V semiconductors for Si-based optoelectronic devices. J Semicond, 2020, 41(1), 011301 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/1/011301
[9]
Chen S, Li W, Wu J, et al. Electrically pumped continuous-wave III–V quantum dot lasers on silicon. Nat Photonics, 2016, 10(5), 307 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.21
[10]
Shang C, Gossard A C, Bowers J E, et al. Low-threshold epitaxially grown 1.3-μm InAs quantum dot lasers on patterned (001) Si. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2019, 25(6), 1502207 doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2927581
[11]
Van de Walle C G. Band lineups and deformation potentials in the model-solid theory. Phys Rev B, 1989, 39(3), 1871 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.1871
[12]
Deng H X, Luo J W, Wei S H. Chemical trends of stability and band alignment of lattice-matched II–VI/III–V semiconductor interfaces. Phys Rev B, 2015, 91(7), 075315 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.075315
[13]
Mano T, Fujioka H, Ono K, et al. InAs nanocrystal growth on Si (100). Appl Surf Sci, 1998, 130, 760 doi: 10.1016/S0169-4332(98)00150-0
[14]
Heitz R, Ledentsov N N, Bimberg D, et al. Optical properties of InAs quantum dots in a Si matrix. Appl Phys Lett, 1999, 74(12), 1701 doi: 10.1063/1.123660
[15]
Tersoff J. Theory of semiconductor heterojunctions: The role of quantum dipoles. Phys Rev B, 1984, 30(8), 4874 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.4874
[16]
Bru-Chevallier C, El Akra A, Pelloux-Gervais D, et al. InGaAs quantum dots grown by molecular beam epitaxy for light emission on Si substrates. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 2011, 11(10), 9153 doi: 10.1166/jnn.2011.4282
[17]
Li Y H, Walsh A, Chen S, et al. Revised ab initio natural band offsets of all group IV, II–VI, and III–V semiconductors. Appl Phys Lett, 2009, 94(21), 212109 doi: 10.1063/1.3143626
[18]
Lang L, Zhang Y Y, Xu P, et al. Three-step approach for computing band offsets and its application to inorganic ABX3 halide perovskites. Phys Rev B, 2015, 92(7), 075102 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.075102
[19]
Hohenberg P, Kohn W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev, 1964, 136(3B), B864 doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864
[20]
Kohn W, Sham L J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev, 1965, 140(4A), A1133 doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133
[21]
Ceperley D M, Alder B J. Ground state of the electron Gas by a stochastic method. Phys Rev Lett, 1980, 45(7), 566 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566
[22]
Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev Lett, 1996, 6(1), 15 doi: 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0
[23]
Madelung O. Semiconductors: data handbook. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004
[24]
Wei S H, Zunger A. Calculated natural band offsets of all II–VI and III–V semiconductors: Chemical trends and the role of cation d orbitals. Appl Phys Lett, 1998, 72(16), 2011 doi: 10.1063/1.121249
[25]
Deng H X, Huang B, Wei S H. Stable interface structures of heterovalent semiconductor superlattices: The case of (GaSb)n(ZnTe)n. Comput Mater Sci, 2015, 98, 340 doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.11.008
[26]
Christensen N E. Dipole effects and band offsets at semiconductor interfaces. Phys Rev B, 1988, 37(9), 4528 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.4528
[27]
Saive R, Emmer H, Chen C T, et al. Study of the interface in a GaP/Si heterojunction solar cell. IEEE J Photovolt, 2018, 8, 1568 doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2861724
[28]
Han C B, He C, Li X J. Near-infrared light emission from a GaN/Si nanoheterostructure array. Adv Mater, 2011, 23(41), 4811 doi: 10.1002/adma.201101801
[29]
List R S, Woicik J C, Lindau I, et al. The Si/GaAs (110) heterojunction: Strain, disorder, and valence-band discontinuity. J Vac Sci Technol B, 1987, 5(4), 1279 doi: 10.1116/1.583819
[30]
Van de Walle C G, Martin R M. Theoretical calculations of heterojunction discontinuities in the Si/Ge system. Phys Rev B, 1986, 34(8), 5621 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.5621
[31]
Pollard W. Valence-band discontinuities at semiconductor heterojunctions. J Appl Phys, 1991, 69(5), 3154 doi: 10.1063/1.348584
[32]
Halder N N, Biswas P, Nagabhushan B, et al. Effect of band offset on carrier transport and infrared detection in InP quantum dots/Si nano-heterojunction grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition technique. J Appl Phys, 2014, 115(20), 203719 doi: 10.1063/1.4880738
[33]
Katnani A D, Margaritondo G. Microscopic study of semiconductor heterojunctions: Photoemission measurement of the valance-band discontinuity and of the potential barriers. Phys Rev B, 1983, 28(4), 1944 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.1944
Fig. 1.  (Color online) Five steps for correcting the effect of lattice mismatch on valence band offset calculations using core energy levels as a reference.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) (a–e) show the five superlattice structures constructed. (a) Equilibrium-unidirectional superlattice of Si. (b) Unidirectional-bidirectional strain superlattice of Si. (c) Bidirectional strain superlattice of Si and InAs. (d) Bidirectional-unidirectional superlattice of InAs. (e) Unidirectional-equilibrium superlattice of InAs.

Fig. 3.  (Color online) The abrupt interface, mixed cation interface and mixed anion interface formed by Si and InAs along the [100] direction, and the corresponding potential distribution along the growth orientation of the superlattices.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) Band offset diagram of the Si/GaSb, Si/InAs and Si/InSb systems with zinc-blende structure along the [100], [110], and [111] directions. The energy is relative to the vacuum level of Si.

Table 1.   Valence band offsets (in eV) of Si/III–V semiconductors with lattice mismatch and heterovalence along the orientation of [100], [110], [111], respectively. The lattice constants (in Å) of III–V semiconductors and mismatches (referred to the lattice constant of Si, e.g. 5.43 Å) are also given. The positive value represents that the position of the valence band of the III–V semiconductor is higher than that of Si.

SystemLattice constantMismatch
(%)
[100][110] abrupt[111]Exp.\Theo.
Mixed anionMixed cationAverageMixed anionMixed cationAverage
Si/AlP5.460.55–0.56–1.21–0.88–0.84–0.59–1.22–0.91–\–0.91i
Si/AlAs5.664.24–0.07–0.70–0.39–0.260.05–0.53–0.24–\–
Si/AlSb6.1413.080.310.260.280.520.370.410.39–\–
Si/GaN4.53–16.57–1.92–1.99–1.95–2.00–1.52–1.68–1.60–1.90ii\–
Si/GaP5.450.370.04–0.59–0.28–0.280.02–0.58–0.28–0.24±0.12iii
\–0.27i
Si/GaAs5.654.050.29–0.090.100.280.510.110.310.23±0.10iv \0.12v
Si/GaSb6.1012.340.410.260.340.620.360.270.31–\–
Si/InP5.878.100.10–0.27–0.080.250.430.070.250.12vi\0.36vii
Si/InAs6.0611.600.290.110.200.420.420.370.400.31viii\0.50vii
Si/InSb6.4819.340.160.140.150.730.220.240.230.06ix\0.25vii
i from Ref. [26]; ii from Ref. [28]; iii from Ref. [27]; iv from Ref. [29]; v from Ref. [30]; vi from Ref. [32]; vii from Ref. [31]; Viii from Ref. [13]; ix from Ref. [33].
DownLoad: CSV
[1]
Bioud Y A, Boucherif A, Myronov M, et al. Uprooting defects to enable high-performance III–V optoelectronic devices on silicon. Nat Commun, 2019, 10, 4322 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12353-9
[2]
Zacharias M, Kelires P C. Temperature dependence of the optical properties of silicon nanocrystals. Phys Rev B, 2020, 101(24), 245122 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.245122
[3]
Lu P, Li D, Cao Y, et al. Si nanocrystals-based multilayers for luminescent and photovoltaic device applications. J Semicond, 2018, 39(6), 061007 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/6/061007
[4]
Zhao S, Liu X, Pi X, et al. Light-emitting diodes based on colloidal silicon quantum dots. J Semicond, 2018, 39(6), 061008 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/6/061008
[5]
Zheng J, Liu Z, Xue C, et al. Recent progress in GeSn growth and GeSn-based photonic devices. J Semicond, 2018, 39(6), 061006 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/6/061006
[6]
Boras G, Yu X, Liu H. III–V ternary nanowires on Si substrates: growth, characterization and device applications. J Semicond, 2019, 40(10), 101301 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/10/101301
[7]
Zhang J, Yang X, Feng Y, et al. Vacancy-engineering-induced dislocation inclination in III-nitrides on Si substrates. Phys Rev Mater, 2020, 4(7), 073402 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.073402
[8]
Zhao C, Xu B, Wang Z, et al. Boron-doped III–V semiconductors for Si-based optoelectronic devices. J Semicond, 2020, 41(1), 011301 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/1/011301
[9]
Chen S, Li W, Wu J, et al. Electrically pumped continuous-wave III–V quantum dot lasers on silicon. Nat Photonics, 2016, 10(5), 307 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.21
[10]
Shang C, Gossard A C, Bowers J E, et al. Low-threshold epitaxially grown 1.3-μm InAs quantum dot lasers on patterned (001) Si. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2019, 25(6), 1502207 doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2927581
[11]
Van de Walle C G. Band lineups and deformation potentials in the model-solid theory. Phys Rev B, 1989, 39(3), 1871 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.1871
[12]
Deng H X, Luo J W, Wei S H. Chemical trends of stability and band alignment of lattice-matched II–VI/III–V semiconductor interfaces. Phys Rev B, 2015, 91(7), 075315 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.075315
[13]
Mano T, Fujioka H, Ono K, et al. InAs nanocrystal growth on Si (100). Appl Surf Sci, 1998, 130, 760 doi: 10.1016/S0169-4332(98)00150-0
[14]
Heitz R, Ledentsov N N, Bimberg D, et al. Optical properties of InAs quantum dots in a Si matrix. Appl Phys Lett, 1999, 74(12), 1701 doi: 10.1063/1.123660
[15]
Tersoff J. Theory of semiconductor heterojunctions: The role of quantum dipoles. Phys Rev B, 1984, 30(8), 4874 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.4874
[16]
Bru-Chevallier C, El Akra A, Pelloux-Gervais D, et al. InGaAs quantum dots grown by molecular beam epitaxy for light emission on Si substrates. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 2011, 11(10), 9153 doi: 10.1166/jnn.2011.4282
[17]
Li Y H, Walsh A, Chen S, et al. Revised ab initio natural band offsets of all group IV, II–VI, and III–V semiconductors. Appl Phys Lett, 2009, 94(21), 212109 doi: 10.1063/1.3143626
[18]
Lang L, Zhang Y Y, Xu P, et al. Three-step approach for computing band offsets and its application to inorganic ABX3 halide perovskites. Phys Rev B, 2015, 92(7), 075102 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.075102
[19]
Hohenberg P, Kohn W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev, 1964, 136(3B), B864 doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864
[20]
Kohn W, Sham L J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev, 1965, 140(4A), A1133 doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133
[21]
Ceperley D M, Alder B J. Ground state of the electron Gas by a stochastic method. Phys Rev Lett, 1980, 45(7), 566 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566
[22]
Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev Lett, 1996, 6(1), 15 doi: 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0
[23]
Madelung O. Semiconductors: data handbook. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004
[24]
Wei S H, Zunger A. Calculated natural band offsets of all II–VI and III–V semiconductors: Chemical trends and the role of cation d orbitals. Appl Phys Lett, 1998, 72(16), 2011 doi: 10.1063/1.121249
[25]
Deng H X, Huang B, Wei S H. Stable interface structures of heterovalent semiconductor superlattices: The case of (GaSb)n(ZnTe)n. Comput Mater Sci, 2015, 98, 340 doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.11.008
[26]
Christensen N E. Dipole effects and band offsets at semiconductor interfaces. Phys Rev B, 1988, 37(9), 4528 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.4528
[27]
Saive R, Emmer H, Chen C T, et al. Study of the interface in a GaP/Si heterojunction solar cell. IEEE J Photovolt, 2018, 8, 1568 doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2861724
[28]
Han C B, He C, Li X J. Near-infrared light emission from a GaN/Si nanoheterostructure array. Adv Mater, 2011, 23(41), 4811 doi: 10.1002/adma.201101801
[29]
List R S, Woicik J C, Lindau I, et al. The Si/GaAs (110) heterojunction: Strain, disorder, and valence-band discontinuity. J Vac Sci Technol B, 1987, 5(4), 1279 doi: 10.1116/1.583819
[30]
Van de Walle C G, Martin R M. Theoretical calculations of heterojunction discontinuities in the Si/Ge system. Phys Rev B, 1986, 34(8), 5621 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.5621
[31]
Pollard W. Valence-band discontinuities at semiconductor heterojunctions. J Appl Phys, 1991, 69(5), 3154 doi: 10.1063/1.348584
[32]
Halder N N, Biswas P, Nagabhushan B, et al. Effect of band offset on carrier transport and infrared detection in InP quantum dots/Si nano-heterojunction grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition technique. J Appl Phys, 2014, 115(20), 203719 doi: 10.1063/1.4880738
[33]
Katnani A D, Margaritondo G. Microscopic study of semiconductor heterojunctions: Photoemission measurement of the valance-band discontinuity and of the potential barriers. Phys Rev B, 1983, 28(4), 1944 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.1944
1

n-Type acceptor–acceptor polymer semiconductors

Yongqiang Shi, Liming Ding

Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(10): 100202. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/10/100202

2

Revisit of the band gaps of rutile SnO2 and TiO2: a first-principles study

Xuefen Cai, Peng Zhang, Su-Huai Wei

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(9): 092101. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/9/092101

3

Column readout circuit with improved offset mismatch and charge sharing for CMOS image sensor

Zhongjie Guo, Ningmei Yu, Longsheng Wu

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(12): 122404. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/12/122404

4

Review of recent progresses on flexible oxide semiconductor thin film transistors based on atomic layer deposition processes

Jiazhen Sheng, Ki-Lim Han, TaeHyun Hong, Wan-Ho Choi, Jin-Seong Park, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(1): 011008. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/1/011008

5

First-principles calculations of Mg2X (X = Si, Ge, Sn) semiconductors with the calcium fluorite structure

Sandong Guo

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(5): 053002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/5/053002

6

An InGaAs graded buffer layer in solar cells

Xiaosheng Qu, Hongyin Bao, Hanieh. S. Nikjalal, Liling Xiong, Hongxin Zhen, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(1): 014011. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/1/014011

7

Large-signal characterizations of DDR IMPATT devices based on group Ⅲ-Ⅴ semiconductors at millimeter-wave and terahertz frequencies

Aritra Acharyya, Aliva Mallik, Debopriya Banerjee, Suman Ganguli, Arindam Das, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(8): 084003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/8/084003

8

A theoretical model of the femtosecond laser ablation of semiconductors considering inverse bremsstrahlung absorption

Lin Xiaohui, Zhang Chibin, Ren Weisong, Jiang Shuyun, Ouyang Quanhui, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(4): 046002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/4/046002

9

Microstructural properties of over-doped GaN-based diluted magnetic semiconductors grown by MOCVD

Tao Zhikuo, Zhang Rong, Xiu Xiangqian, Cui Xugao, Li Li, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(7): 073002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/7/073002

10

CMOS linear-in-dB VGA with DC offset cancellation for direct-conversion receivers

Lei Qianqian, Chen Zhiming, Shi Yin, Chu Xiaojie, Gong Zheng, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(10): 105008. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/10/105008

11

Approximate Graphic Method for Solving Fermi Level and Majority Carrier Density of Semiconductors with Multiple Donors and Multiple Acceptors

Ken K. Chin

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(6): 062001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/6/062001

12

A programmable gain amplifier with a DC offset calibration loop for a direct-conversion WLAN transceiver

Lei Qianqian, Lin Min, Chen Zhiming, Shi Yin

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(4): 045006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/4/045006

13

Study and analysis of coefficient mismatch in a MASH21 sigma–delta modulator

Ge Binjie, Wang Xin’an, Zhang Xing, Feng Xiaoxing, Wang Qingqin, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(1): 015007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/1/015007

14

A direct-conversion WLAN transceiver baseband with DC offset compensation and carrier leakage reduction

Yuan Fang, Yan Jun, Ma Heping, Shi Yin, Dai Fa Foster, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(10): 105003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/10/105003

15

An offset-insensitive switched-capacitor bandgap reference with continuous output

Zheng Peng, Yan Wei, Zhang Ke, Li Wenhong

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 085006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/085006

16

Alloy Temperature Dependence of Offset Voltage and Ohmic Contact Resistance in Thin Base InGaP/GaAs HBTs

Yang Wei, Liu Xunchun, Zhu Min, Wang Runmei, Shen Huajun, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(5): 765-768.

17

Temperature Dependence of Vacuum Rabi Splitting in a Single Quantum Dot-Semiconductor Microcavity

Zhu Kadi, Li Waisang

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(3): 489-493.

18

A DC-Offset Cancellation Scheme in a Direct-Conversion Receiver for IEEE 802.11a WLAN

Xu Qiming, Shi Yin, Gao Peng, Hu Xueqing, Yan Jun, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(4): 653-657.

19

Effect of Lattice Mismatch on Luminescence of ZnO/Si Hetero-Structure

Fu Zhuxi, Sun Xiankai, Zhu Junjie, Lin Bixia

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 239-244.

20

Lattice-Matched InP-Based HEMTs with fT of 120GHz

Chen Liqiang, Zhang Haiying, Yin Junjian, Qian He, and Niu Jiebin, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(3): 472-475.

1. Zhu, H., Wen, Z., Xiong, W. et al. Accurate and efficient prediction of Schottky barrier heights in 2D semimetal/silicon heterojunctions. Wuli Huaxue Xuebao/ Acta Physico - Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(7): 100078. doi:10.1016/j.actphy.2025.100078
2. Liang, H.-P., Geng, S., Jia, T. et al. Unveiling disparities and promises of Cu and Ag chalcopyrites for thermoelectrics. Physical Review B, 2024, 109(3): 035205. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.035205
3. Sabri, S., Malek, R., Kassmi, K. A theoretical study of InAs/InP and InAs/GaAs QDs systems: Formation mechanisms and photoluminescence characterization. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.158
4. Kang, J., Zhang, X., Wei, S.-H. Advances and challenges in DFT-based energy materials design. Chinese Physics B, 2022, 31(10): 107105. doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ac89d7
5. Qiu, C., Zhang, C., Geng, S. et al. First-Principles Study of the Origin of the Distinct Conductivity Type of Monolayer MoSe2and WSe2. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2022, 126(38): 16539-16545. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05131
6. Wei, L., Wei, J., Kuai, X. et al. Optimization and Fabrication of MEMS suspended structures for nanoscale thermoelectric devices. Nanotechnology, 2022, 33(32): 325301. doi:10.1088/1361-6528/ac667a
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Yuying Hu, Chen Qiu, Tao Shen, Kaike Yang, Huixiong Deng. Direct calculations on the band offsets of large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent Si and III–V semiconductors[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(11): 112102. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112102
    Y Y Hu, C Qiu, T Shen, K K Yang, H X Deng, Direct calculations on the band offsets of large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent Si and III–V semiconductors[J]. J. Semicond., 2021, 42(11): 112102. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112102.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 3656 Times PDF downloads: 140 Times Cited by: 6 Times

    History

    Received: 30 April 2021 Revised: Online: Accepted Manuscript: 11 June 2021Uncorrected proof: 21 June 2021Published: 01 November 2021

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Yuying Hu, Chen Qiu, Tao Shen, Kaike Yang, Huixiong Deng. Direct calculations on the band offsets of large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent Si and III–V semiconductors[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(11): 112102. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112102 ****Y Y Hu, C Qiu, T Shen, K K Yang, H X Deng, Direct calculations on the band offsets of large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent Si and III–V semiconductors[J]. J. Semicond., 2021, 42(11): 112102. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112102.
      Citation:
      Yuying Hu, Chen Qiu, Tao Shen, Kaike Yang, Huixiong Deng. Direct calculations on the band offsets of large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent Si and III–V semiconductors[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(11): 112102. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112102 ****
      Y Y Hu, C Qiu, T Shen, K K Yang, H X Deng, Direct calculations on the band offsets of large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent Si and III–V semiconductors[J]. J. Semicond., 2021, 42(11): 112102. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112102.

      Direct calculations on the band offsets of large-lattice-mismatched and heterovalent Si and III–V semiconductors

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112102
      More Information
      • Yuying Hu:received her BS degree in 2018 from the School of Physics and Electronics, Henan University, Kaifeng, China. Now she is an MS student at the State Key Laboratory of Superlattices for Semiconductors, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Her research interests include Si-based luminescence and semiconductor physics
      • Kaike Yang:received his PhD degree from the University of the Basque Country, Spain in 2016, and studied as a post-doctor in the Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, until 2020. At present, he is working in the Hunan Normal University, Changsha. His main research interest is in phonon physics, electron-phonon interaction and thermoelectric properties
      • Huixiong Deng:received his BS from Inner Mongolia University in 2005, and PhD from the Institute of Semiconductor, Chinese Academy of Sciences, in 2010. From March 2011 to February 2014, he worked as a Postdoctoral Fellow at National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), USA. Currently, he is a professor at the Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences. His research interests include semiconductor physics, doping and defect physics in semiconductors, and the calculation and design of semiconductor optoelectronic materials
      • Corresponding author: hxdeng@semi.ac.cn
      • Received Date: 2021-04-30
      • Published Date: 2021-11-10

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return