J. Semicond. > 2023, Volume 44 > Issue 2 > 020201

RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS

Perovskite/organic tandem solar cells

Jie Sun1, 2 and Liming Ding1,

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Liming Ding, ding@nanoctr.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/2/020201

PDF

Turn off MathJax

In recent years, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) for single-junction perovskite solar cells (PSCs)[1, 2] has reached 25.7%, approaching the Shockley-Queisser limit (S-Q limit). Further enhancing efficiency is challenging. Tandem solar cells offer an effective way to further increase the efficiency beyond S-Q limit. Currently, perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells (TSCs)[3-5] have achieved a PCE of 31.3%[6]. However, the complicated preparation processes and high cost hinder their commercialization application. In contrast, thin-film perovskite/organic TSCs have the advantages of solution processability, low cost, and flexibility, making them to be promising candidates for the next-generation photovoltaic technology.

The idea of combining perovskite with photoactive organics was first proposed by Ding et al.[7] in 2014, and they designed the first integrated solar cell structured with ITO/PEDOT:PSS/CH3NH3PbI3/(PDPP3T:PC61BM)/Ca/Al. A bulk heterojunction layer composed of PDPP3T:PC61BM blend was inserted into a PSC structure, which broadened the spectral response to 970 nm. Though this structure is not a tandem structure, as there is no interconnecting layer (ICL), it still inspired the attempts to combine PSCs with organic materials to broaden the photoresponse. After that, Jen et al.[8] fabricated the first perovskite/organic TSCs with PBSeDTEG8 as the active layer of front subcell and CH3NH3PbI3 as the active layer of rear subcell. The tandem cells gave a PCE of 10.23%. However, the structure with organic solar cell (OSC) as the front cell would cause serious deposition problem, as the high temperature and solvent treatment during the processing of perovskite layer could damage the already deposited OSC. Russell et al.[9] designed a ~90 nm thick perovskite-based front subcell and a ~100 nm thick polymer-based rear subcell, yielding a PCE of 15.9%. This structure allows long wavelength light to pass through PSC and to be utilized by the OSC (Fig. 1). Also, it avoids the damage to organic layer during processing.

Fig. 1.  (Color online) The structure for perovskite-organic tandem solar cells.

After years of exploration, many effective strategies have been proposed to improve the photovoltaic performance of perovskite/organic TSCs, including broadening the light absorption, optimizing the ICL, and passivating the bulk and interfacial defects. The PCE for perovskite/organic TSCs has reached 23.1%[10]. The PCE progress for perovskite/organic TSCs is illustrated in Fig. 2, and the device details can be found in Table 1.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) The PCE advance for perovskite-organic tandem solar cells.
Table 1.  Performance data for perovskite-organic tandem solar cells. (* indicates the certified PCE)
Front cellICLRear cellVoc
(V)
Jsc
(mA/cm2)
FF
(%)
PCE
(%)
Ref.
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PBSeDTEG8:PC61BM/PFN/TiO2PEDOT:PSS PH500/PEDOT:PSS 4083CH3NH3PbI3/PC61BM/PFN/Al1.5210.0567.010.23[8]
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/CH3NH3PbI3/PC61BMC60-SB/Ag/MoO3PCE-10:PC71BM/C60-N/Ag1.6212.9075.016.00[9]
ITO/SnO2/CsPbI2Br/PTAAMoO3/Au/ZnOPTB7-Th:COi8DFIC:PC71BM/
MoO3/Ag
1.7111.9873.415.04[11]
ITO/PTAA/Cs0.1(FA0.6MA0.4)0.9Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3/
PC61BM/BCP
Ag/PEDOT:PSSPBDB-T:SN6IC-4F/C60-bis/
BCP/Ag
1.8511.5271.015.13[20]
ITO/ZnO/SnO2/CsPbI2Br/PDCBTMoO3/Ag/ZnOPM6:Y6/MoO3/Ag1.9512.4675.618.38[12]
ITO/NiOx/FA0.8MA0.02Cs0.18PbI1.8Br1.2/C60BCP/Ag/MoOxPBDBT-2F:Y6:PC71BM/TPBi/Ag1.9013.0583.119.54*[16]
ITO/SnO2/ZnO/CsPbI2BrPTAA/MoO3/Au/ZnOD18:Y6/MoO3/Ag2.0513.0725.320.18[13]
ITO/SnO2/CsPbI1.8Br1.2/TAClPBDB-T/MoO3/Au/
ZnO/PFN
PM6:Y6/MoO3/Al2.0513.3676.821.04[14]
ITO/ZnO/CsPbI2Br/polyTPDMoO3/Ag/PFN-BrPM6:Y6-BO/MoO3/Ag1.9613.3080.821.10[15]
ITO/Poly-TPD/(MAPbI2Br + Pb(SCN)2)PCBM/BCP/Au/MoO3PM6:Y6/PFN-Br/Ag1.9413.1278.720.03[17]
ITO/poly-TPD/(MA0.9FA0.1PbI2Br + Pb(SCN)2)PCBM/BCP/Au/MoO3PM6:CH1007/PFN-Br/Ag1.9613.8078.421.2[21]
ITO/2PACz/FA0.6MA0.4Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3C60/BCP/Ag/MoOxPTB7-Th:BTPV-4Cl-eC9/
PDINN/Ag
1.8815.7074.622.00[18]
ITO/PTAA/FA0.8Cs0.2Pb(I0.5Br0.5)3/PEAI/
PC61BM/AZO-NP
SnOx/InOx/MoOxPM6:Y6:PC61BM/C60/BCP/Ag2.1514.0080.023.10*[10]
ITO/NiOx/BPA/Cs0.25FA0.75Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3C60/BCP/CRL/MoOxPM6:Y6/PNDIT-F3N/Ag2.0514.8377.222.94*[19]
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

Broadening the absorption spectra. Perovskite and organic materials absorb photons of short and long wavelength, respectively. The absorption spectra for both perovskite and organic materials in early TSCs are overlapping, leading to insufficient sunlight utilization. Therefore, designing wider-bandgap perovskite and narrower-bandgap organic materials to enhance sunlight absorption is an effective approach to improve the performance of TSCs. In 2019, Ding et al.[11] developed a 2T tandem solar cell with CsPbI2Br cell as the front cell with high response to light before 650 nm and PTB7-Th:COi8DFIC:PC71BM ternary cell as the rear cell absorbing light at 650–1050 nm. The TSC offered a 15.04% PCE. In 2020, Cao et al.[12] used a wide-bandgap (WBG) CsPbI2Br front cell in series with a narrow-bandgap (NBG) PM6:Y6 rear cell and obtained a TSC with a 18.4% PCE. The thickness control of perovskite layer is vital for the optimal utilization of the solar spectrum. If it is too thin, the short-wavelength photons cannot be absorbed completely; when it is too thick, the transmittance would be greatly reduced. In 2021, Ding et al.[13] further enhanced the efficiency of inorganic perovskite/organic TSCs to 20.18% by integrating a WBG CsPbI2Br front cell and a D18:Y6 organic rear cell. Since then, scientists have focused on varying the ratio of I and Br in CsPbI2Br to tune the bandgap, pushing the PCE to more than 21%[14, 15]. Organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite was also used in perovskite/organic TSCs in recent years. In 2020, Yang et al.[16] proposed a semi-empirical model to select the optimum combination of materials for perovskite/organic TSCs. The optimal combination was FA0.8MA0.02Cs0.18PbI1.8Br1.2 (1.77 eV) and PBDBT-2F:Y6:PC71BM (1.41 eV), and the TSCs gave high PCE (certified PCE of 19.54%) and high reproducibility. In 2022, Cao et al.[17] used MAPbI2Br doped with Pb(SCN)2 front cell and an organic rear cell to make a TSC with over 20.03% PCE. In 2022, Li et al.[18] synthesized a small molecule acceptor BTPV-4Cl-eC9 to expand the photoresponse to infrared region, and they combined PTB7-Th:BTPV-4Cl-eC9 rear cell with FA0.6MA0.4Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3 front cell to make high-performance TSCs with a PCE of 22%.

Optimizing the ICL. The ICL connects two subcells to achieve electron and hole recombination and protects the front cell from being destroyed during the deposition process of the rear cell. A good ICL possesses good transmittance, chemical stability, and low resistive losses. In 2016, C60-SB/Ag/MoO3 was used as the ICL[9], which alleviated the damage of thermal annealing and chemical treatment to polymer front cells during the process of perovskite layer. In 2020, Yang et al.[16] demonstrated a simplified ICL structure by using a thin MoOx/Ag/BCP layer, yielding low optical loss and high reproducibility. In 2021, Ding et al.[13] used PTAA/MoO3/Au/ZnO as the ICL. The thin Au layer (1 nm) reduces the charge-transport barrier and contributes to the high PCE of 20.18%. The above ICLs adopted a thin layer of metal inserted between two charge-transport layers. However, despite the excellent conductivity of metal, it is not transparent, causing optical losses. Very recently, Riedl et al.[10] inserted an ultrathin InOx layer (1.5 nm) made by atomic layer deposition (ALD) to eliminate the Schottky barrier between the low-workfunction SnOx and the high-workfunction MoOx. InOx avoided the use of metal layer and the optical loss is negligible, greatly improving the photovoltaic performance of TSCs. Hou et al.[19] developed C60/BCP/IZO/MoOx ICL. IZO can improve carrier recombination and minimize the optical losses at the same time, yielding a certified PCE of 22.94%. Cao et al.[17] investigated the influence of ICL thickness on the performance of TSCs. Thin ICL may lead to poor device performance due to inefficient recombination, while thick ICL can lead to inefficient electron extraction, lower subcell EQE and device efficiency, so the ICL thickness needs to be optimized. Overall, an excellent ICL layer should be chemically inert, conductive, and transparent, providing sufficient recombination sites between the front and rear subcells.

Passivating bulk and interfacial defects. A large number of defects exist in polycrystalline perovskite films, especially at the interface between ICL and perovskite layer, which will cause severe nonradiative recombination. It leads to large Voc loss and undermines the long-term stability of perovskite front cell[13]. So, interfacial passivation is essential for improving the performance of TSCs. In 2020, Jen et al.[20] used phenmethylammonium bromide to passivate the WBG perovskite layer Cs0.1(FA0.6MA0.4)0.9Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3 and the TSCs gave a PCE of 15.13%. In 2021, Cao et al.[21] reduced defects at grain boundaries and improved phase stability through compositional engineering. FA+ was incorporated, and MA0.9FA0.1PbI2Br doped with Pb(SCN)2 presented homogeneous crystallization and reduced SCN-induced PbI2 excessive aggregation. The TSCs with PM6:CH1007 subcell gave a PCE of 21%. In 2022, Li et al.[18] introduced organic cation ClFA+ to FA0.6MA0.4Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3 film to passivate bulk defects in perovskite films. A high Voc of 1.25 V and a high FF of 83.0% for the perovskite front cell were achieved. In 2022, Riedl et al.[10] used large organic cation-based halides to passivate perovskite surface by forming a two-dimensional (2D) layer. The valence band was lowered to prevent holes from reaching the electron extraction layer, and an efficiency of 23.1% was achieved. In 2022, Hou et al.[19] used nickel oxide hole-transport layer passivated by phenylphosphonic acid, and obtained a certified efficiency of 22.94%.

In short, perovskite-organic TSCs already demonstrate a record PCE of 23.1%. Further work should focus on long-term stability, reproducible and reliable fabrication, and low cost, which are very important for future commercialization.

L. Ding thanks the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFB3803300), the open research fund of Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory (2021SLABFK02), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21961160720) for financial support.



[1]
Zhang L X, Pan X Y, Liu L, et al. Star perovskite materials. J Semicond, 2022, 43, 030203 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/3/030203
[2]
Kim M, Jeong J, Lu H, et al. Conformal quantum dot-SnO2 layers as electron transporters for efficient perovskite solar cells. Science, 2022, 375, 302 doi: 10.1126/science.abh1885
[3]
Cheng Y H, Ding L M. Perovskite/Si tandem solar cells: Fundamentals, advances, challenges, and novel applications. SusMat, 2021, 1, 324 doi: doi/full/10.1002/sus2.25
[4]
Chen S, Zuo C T, Xu B M, et al. Monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells offer an efficiency over 29%. J Semicond, 2021, 42, 120203 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/12/120203
[5]
Fang Z M, Zeng Q, Zuo C T, et al. Perovskite-based tandem solar cells. Sci Bull, 2021, 66, 621 doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2020.11.006
[6]
National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Best Research-Cell Efficiencies. 2022
[7]
Zuo C T, Ding L M. Bulk heterojunctions push the photoresponse of perovskite solar cells to 970 nm. J Mater Chem A, 2015, 3, 9063 doi: 10.1039/C4TA04482G
[8]
Chen C C, Bae S H, Chang W H, et al. Perovskite/polymer monolithic hybrid tandem solar cells utilizing a low-temperature, full solution process. Mater Horizons, 2015, 2, 203 doi: 10.1039/C4MH00237G
[9]
Liu Y, Renna L A, Bag M, et al. High efficiency tandem thin-perovskite/polymer solar cells with a graded recombination layer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8, 7070 doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b12740
[10]
Brinkmann K O, Becker T, Zimmermann F, et al. Perovskite-organic tandem solar cells with indium oxide interconnect. Nature, 2022, 604, 280 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04455-0
[11]
Zeng Q, Liu L, Xiao Z, et al. A two-terminal all-inorganic perovskite/organic tandem solar cell. Sci Bull, 2019, 64, 885 doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.05.015
[12]
Xie S, Xia R, Chen Z, et al. Efficient monolithic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells and their efficiency potential. Nano Energy, 2020, 78, 105238 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105238
[13]
Liu L, Xiao Z, Zuo C, et al. Inorganic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with efficiency over 20%. J Semicond, 2021, 42, 020501 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/2/020501
[14]
Chen W, Li D, Chen X, et al. Surface reconstruction for stable monolithic all-inorganic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with over 21% efficiency. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32, 2109321 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202109321
[15]
Wang P, Li W, Sandberg O J, et al. Tuning of the interconnecting layer for monolithic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with record efficiency exceeding 21%. Nano Lett, 2021, 21, 7845 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02897
[16]
Chen X, Jia Z Y, Chen Z, et al. Efficient and reproducible monolithic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with low-loss interconnecting layers. Joule, 2020, 4, 1594 doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.006
[17]
Xie Y M, Niu T, Yao Q, et al. Understanding the role of interconnecting layer on determining monolithic perovskite/organic tandem device carrier recombination properties. J Energy Chem, 2022, 71, 12 doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.03.019
[18]
Qin S, Lu C, Jia Z, et al. Constructing monolithic perovskite/organic tandem solar cell with efficiency of 22.0% via reduced open-circuit voltage loss and broadened absorption spectra. Adv Mater, 2022, 34, 2108829 doi: 10.1002/adma.202108829
[19]
Chen W, Zhu Y, Xiu J, et al. Monolithic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with 23.6% efficiency enabled by reduced voltage losses and optimized interconnecting layer. Nat Energy, 2022, 7, 229 doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00966-8
[20]
Li Z, Wu S F, Zhang J, et al. Hybrid perovskite-organic flexible tandem solar cell enabling highly efficient electrocatalysis overall water splitting. Adv Energy Mater, 2020, 10, 2000361 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202000361
[21]
Xie Y M, Yao Q, Zeng Z, et al. Homogeneous grain boundary passivation in wide-bandgap perovskite films enables fabrication of monolithic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with over 21% efficiency. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32, 2112126 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202112126
Fig. 1.  (Color online) The structure for perovskite-organic tandem solar cells.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) The PCE advance for perovskite-organic tandem solar cells.

Table 1.   Performance data for perovskite-organic tandem solar cells. (* indicates the certified PCE)

Front cellICLRear cellVoc
(V)
Jsc
(mA/cm2)
FF
(%)
PCE
(%)
Ref.
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PBSeDTEG8:PC61BM/PFN/TiO2PEDOT:PSS PH500/PEDOT:PSS 4083CH3NH3PbI3/PC61BM/PFN/Al1.5210.0567.010.23[8]
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/CH3NH3PbI3/PC61BMC60-SB/Ag/MoO3PCE-10:PC71BM/C60-N/Ag1.6212.9075.016.00[9]
ITO/SnO2/CsPbI2Br/PTAAMoO3/Au/ZnOPTB7-Th:COi8DFIC:PC71BM/
MoO3/Ag
1.7111.9873.415.04[11]
ITO/PTAA/Cs0.1(FA0.6MA0.4)0.9Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3/
PC61BM/BCP
Ag/PEDOT:PSSPBDB-T:SN6IC-4F/C60-bis/
BCP/Ag
1.8511.5271.015.13[20]
ITO/ZnO/SnO2/CsPbI2Br/PDCBTMoO3/Ag/ZnOPM6:Y6/MoO3/Ag1.9512.4675.618.38[12]
ITO/NiOx/FA0.8MA0.02Cs0.18PbI1.8Br1.2/C60BCP/Ag/MoOxPBDBT-2F:Y6:PC71BM/TPBi/Ag1.9013.0583.119.54*[16]
ITO/SnO2/ZnO/CsPbI2BrPTAA/MoO3/Au/ZnOD18:Y6/MoO3/Ag2.0513.0725.320.18[13]
ITO/SnO2/CsPbI1.8Br1.2/TAClPBDB-T/MoO3/Au/
ZnO/PFN
PM6:Y6/MoO3/Al2.0513.3676.821.04[14]
ITO/ZnO/CsPbI2Br/polyTPDMoO3/Ag/PFN-BrPM6:Y6-BO/MoO3/Ag1.9613.3080.821.10[15]
ITO/Poly-TPD/(MAPbI2Br + Pb(SCN)2)PCBM/BCP/Au/MoO3PM6:Y6/PFN-Br/Ag1.9413.1278.720.03[17]
ITO/poly-TPD/(MA0.9FA0.1PbI2Br + Pb(SCN)2)PCBM/BCP/Au/MoO3PM6:CH1007/PFN-Br/Ag1.9613.8078.421.2[21]
ITO/2PACz/FA0.6MA0.4Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3C60/BCP/Ag/MoOxPTB7-Th:BTPV-4Cl-eC9/
PDINN/Ag
1.8815.7074.622.00[18]
ITO/PTAA/FA0.8Cs0.2Pb(I0.5Br0.5)3/PEAI/
PC61BM/AZO-NP
SnOx/InOx/MoOxPM6:Y6:PC61BM/C60/BCP/Ag2.1514.0080.023.10*[10]
ITO/NiOx/BPA/Cs0.25FA0.75Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3C60/BCP/CRL/MoOxPM6:Y6/PNDIT-F3N/Ag2.0514.8377.222.94*[19]
DownLoad: CSV
[1]
Zhang L X, Pan X Y, Liu L, et al. Star perovskite materials. J Semicond, 2022, 43, 030203 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/3/030203
[2]
Kim M, Jeong J, Lu H, et al. Conformal quantum dot-SnO2 layers as electron transporters for efficient perovskite solar cells. Science, 2022, 375, 302 doi: 10.1126/science.abh1885
[3]
Cheng Y H, Ding L M. Perovskite/Si tandem solar cells: Fundamentals, advances, challenges, and novel applications. SusMat, 2021, 1, 324 doi: doi/full/10.1002/sus2.25
[4]
Chen S, Zuo C T, Xu B M, et al. Monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells offer an efficiency over 29%. J Semicond, 2021, 42, 120203 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/12/120203
[5]
Fang Z M, Zeng Q, Zuo C T, et al. Perovskite-based tandem solar cells. Sci Bull, 2021, 66, 621 doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2020.11.006
[6]
National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Best Research-Cell Efficiencies. 2022
[7]
Zuo C T, Ding L M. Bulk heterojunctions push the photoresponse of perovskite solar cells to 970 nm. J Mater Chem A, 2015, 3, 9063 doi: 10.1039/C4TA04482G
[8]
Chen C C, Bae S H, Chang W H, et al. Perovskite/polymer monolithic hybrid tandem solar cells utilizing a low-temperature, full solution process. Mater Horizons, 2015, 2, 203 doi: 10.1039/C4MH00237G
[9]
Liu Y, Renna L A, Bag M, et al. High efficiency tandem thin-perovskite/polymer solar cells with a graded recombination layer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8, 7070 doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b12740
[10]
Brinkmann K O, Becker T, Zimmermann F, et al. Perovskite-organic tandem solar cells with indium oxide interconnect. Nature, 2022, 604, 280 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04455-0
[11]
Zeng Q, Liu L, Xiao Z, et al. A two-terminal all-inorganic perovskite/organic tandem solar cell. Sci Bull, 2019, 64, 885 doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.05.015
[12]
Xie S, Xia R, Chen Z, et al. Efficient monolithic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells and their efficiency potential. Nano Energy, 2020, 78, 105238 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105238
[13]
Liu L, Xiao Z, Zuo C, et al. Inorganic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with efficiency over 20%. J Semicond, 2021, 42, 020501 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/2/020501
[14]
Chen W, Li D, Chen X, et al. Surface reconstruction for stable monolithic all-inorganic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with over 21% efficiency. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32, 2109321 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202109321
[15]
Wang P, Li W, Sandberg O J, et al. Tuning of the interconnecting layer for monolithic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with record efficiency exceeding 21%. Nano Lett, 2021, 21, 7845 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02897
[16]
Chen X, Jia Z Y, Chen Z, et al. Efficient and reproducible monolithic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with low-loss interconnecting layers. Joule, 2020, 4, 1594 doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.006
[17]
Xie Y M, Niu T, Yao Q, et al. Understanding the role of interconnecting layer on determining monolithic perovskite/organic tandem device carrier recombination properties. J Energy Chem, 2022, 71, 12 doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.03.019
[18]
Qin S, Lu C, Jia Z, et al. Constructing monolithic perovskite/organic tandem solar cell with efficiency of 22.0% via reduced open-circuit voltage loss and broadened absorption spectra. Adv Mater, 2022, 34, 2108829 doi: 10.1002/adma.202108829
[19]
Chen W, Zhu Y, Xiu J, et al. Monolithic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with 23.6% efficiency enabled by reduced voltage losses and optimized interconnecting layer. Nat Energy, 2022, 7, 229 doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00966-8
[20]
Li Z, Wu S F, Zhang J, et al. Hybrid perovskite-organic flexible tandem solar cell enabling highly efficient electrocatalysis overall water splitting. Adv Energy Mater, 2020, 10, 2000361 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202000361
[21]
Xie Y M, Yao Q, Zeng Z, et al. Homogeneous grain boundary passivation in wide-bandgap perovskite films enables fabrication of monolithic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with over 21% efficiency. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32, 2112126 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202112126
1

Stronger together: perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells

Shenghan Wu, Shengqiang Ren, Cong Chen, Dewei Zhao

Journal of Semiconductors, 2025, 46(5): 050201. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24110025

2

Nickel oxide for perovskite tandem solar cells

Ting Nie, Yuanhang Cheng, Zhimin Fang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2024, 45(11): 110201. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24070022

3

Inorganic perovskite/organic tandem solar cells with efficiency over 20%

Ling Liu, Zuo Xiao, Chuantian Zuo, Liming Ding

Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(2): 020501. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/2/020501

4

Observation of exciton polariton condensation in a perovskite lattice at room temperature

Jun Zhang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2020, 41(3): 030201. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/3/030201

5

Simulation and application of external quantum efficiency of solar cells based on spectroscopy

Guanlin Chen, Can Han, Lingling Yan, Yuelong Li, Ying Zhao, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(12): 122701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/12/122701

6

Perovskite plasmonic lasers capable of mode modulation

Jingbi You

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(7): 070203. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/7/070203

7

Improved efficiency and photo-stability of methylamine-free perovskite solar cells via cadmium doping

Yong Chen, Yang Zhao, Qiufeng Ye, Zema Chu, Zhigang Yin, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(12): 122201. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/12/122201

8

Surface passivation of perovskite film for efficient solar cells

Yang (Michael) Yang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(4): 040204. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/4/040204

9

Interfacial engineering of printable bottom back metal electrodes for full-solution processed flexible organic solar cells

Hongyu Zhen, Kan Li, Yaokang Zhang, Lina Chen, Liyong Niu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(1): 014002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/1/014002

10

Simulation of double junction In0.46Ga0.54N/Si tandem solar cell

M. Benaicha, L. Dehimi, Nouredine Sengouga

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(4): 044002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/4/044002

11

Large area perovskite solar cell module

Longhua Cai, Lusheng Liang, Jifeng Wu, Bin Ding, Lili Gao, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(1): 014006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/1/014006

12

Comment on Chen et al. "Fabrication and photovoltaic conversion enhancement of graphene/n-Si Schottky barrier solar cells by electrophoretic deposition", Electrochimica Acta, 2014

Lara Valentic, Nima E. Gorji

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(9): 094012. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/9/094012

13

Modified textured surface MOCVD-ZnO:B transparent conductive layers for thin-film solar cells

Xinliang Chen, Congbo Yan, Xinhua Geng, Dekun Zhang, Changchun Wei, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(4): 043002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/4/043002

14

An InGaAs graded buffer layer in solar cells

Xiaosheng Qu, Hongyin Bao, Hanieh. S. Nikjalal, Liling Xiong, Hongxin Zhen, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(1): 014011. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/1/014011

15

Radiation effect on the optical and electrical properties of CdSe(In)/p-Si heterojunction photovoltaic solar cells

M. Ashry, S. Fares

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(10): 102001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/10/102001

16

AlGaAs/GaAs tunnel junctions in a 4-J tandem solar cell

Lü Siyu, Qu Xiaosheng

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(11): 112003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/11/112003

17

Texturization of mono-crystalline silicon solar cells in TMAH without the addition of surfactant

Ou Weiying, Zhang Yao, Li Hailing, Zhao Lei, Zhou Chunlan, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(10): 106002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/10/106002

18

Effect of chemical polish etching and post annealing on the performance of silicon heterojunction solar cells

Jiang Zhenyu, Dou Yuhua, Zhang Yu, Zhou Yuqin, Liu Fengzhen, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 084010. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/084010

19

Thermal analysis and test for single concentrator solar cells

Cui Min, Chen Nuofu, Yang Xiaoli, Wang Yu, Bai Yiming, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(4): 044011. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/4/044011

20

Boron-doped silicon film as a recombination layer in the tunnel junction of a tandem solar cell

Shi Mingji, Wang Zhanguo, Liu Shiyong, Peng Wenbo, Xiao Haibo, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(6): 063001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/6/063001

1. Zhou, Q., Liu, X., Liu, Z. et al. Annual research review of perovskite solar cells in 2023. Materials Futures, 2024, 3(2): 022102. doi:10.1088/2752-5724/ad42ba
2. Cheng, P., An, Y., Jen, A.K.Y. et al. New Nanophotonics Approaches for Enhancing the Efficiency and Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells. Advanced Materials, 2024, 36(17): 2309459. doi:10.1002/adma.202309459
3. Wang, Z., Han, Z., Chu, X. et al. Regulation of Wide Bandgap Perovskite by Rubidium Thiocyanate for Efficient Silicon/Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells. Advanced Materials, 2024. doi:10.1002/adma.202407681
4. Liu, K., Wang, Z., Qu, S. et al. Stress and Strain in Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cells. Nano-Micro Letters, 2023, 15(1): 59. doi:10.1007/s40820-023-01019-3
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 855 Times PDF downloads: 104 Times Cited by: 4 Times

    History

    Received: 03 December 2022 Revised: Online: Uncorrected proof: 05 December 2022Published: 10 February 2023

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Jie Sun, Liming Ding. Perovskite/organic tandem solar cells[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(2): 020201. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/2/020201 ****J Sun, L M Ding. Perovskite/organic tandem solar cells[J]. J. Semicond, 2023, 44(2): 020201. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/2/020201
      Citation:
      Jie Sun, Liming Ding. Perovskite/organic tandem solar cells[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(2): 020201. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/2/020201 ****
      J Sun, L M Ding. Perovskite/organic tandem solar cells[J]. J. Semicond, 2023, 44(2): 020201. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/2/020201

      Perovskite/organic tandem solar cells

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/2/020201
      More Information
      • Jie Sun:got her BS from Minzu University of China in 2021. Now she is a PhD student at University of Chinese Academy of Sciences under the supervision of Prof. Liming Ding. Her research focuses on perovskite devices
      • Liming Ding:got his PhD from University of Science and Technology of China (was a joint student at Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, CAS). He started his research on OSCs and PLEDs in Olle Inganäs Lab in 1998. Later on, he worked at National Center for Polymer Research, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and Argonne National Lab (USA). He joined Konarka as a Senior Scientist in 2008. In 2010, he joined National Center for Nanoscience and Technology as a full professor. His research focuses on innovative materials and devices. He is RSC Fellow, and the Associate Editor for Journal of Semiconductors
      • Corresponding author: ding@nanoctr.cn
      • Received Date: 2022-12-03
        Available Online: 2022-12-05

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return