1. School of Physics & Electronics, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng 224002, ChinaSchool of Physics & Electronics, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng 224002, China
2. Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials Science, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, ChinaKey Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials Science, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
Abstract: A novel InGaN back barrier high electron mobility transistors structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer was grown by metal organic chemical vapor deposition on sapphire substrate. The structural and electrical properties of two samples were investigated and compared:the first sample is the step-graded structure and the second one is the high Al structure as a comparison. By calculating full width at half maximum of XRD measurements, the densities of screw-type threading dislocations are 8.34×108 cm-2 and 11.44×108 cm-2 for step-graded structure and high Al structure, respectively, which are consistent with the results of atomic force microscopy. By Hall measurements, the measured two-dimensional electron gas mobility was 1820 cm2/(V·s) for step-graded structure, and 1300 cm2/(V·s) for high Al structure, respectively. The step-graded structure improves the crystal quality of AlGaN layer due to the released lattice strain. The device was fabricated and leakage current is only 28 μA when the drain voltage is 10 V; it was found that the InGaN back barrier could effectively reduce the buffer leakage current.
Conventional AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) have shown excellent performances in high-frequency applications, for the advantages associated with GaN-based wide band gap semiconductors which include the high breakdown fields, high peak electron and saturation drift velocities, and very high sheet charge densities at the interface resulting from large conduction band offset and strong polarization effects[1-5]. Many new and advanced device structures are being explored, and material quality and device processing are ameliorated[6, 7]. For the larger conduction band offset and higher polarization charge density at the interface, high Al content AlGaN/GaN heterostructures have been demonstrated, and Palacios et al. demonstrated the AlGaN/GaN/InGaN/GaN HEMTs structure with improved buffer isolation[8], and an improved structure with higher 2DEG mobility was reported[9, 10]. In our earlier research, the AlGaN/AlN/GaN structure with the step-graded AlGaN barrier layer was demonstrated, which improved the crystal quality of high Al content AlGaN layer[11]. However, high Al content AlGaN barrier results in a larger conduction-band discontinuity and a higher barrier that help confine the 2DEG. But the increased lattice mismatch and strain associated with high Al content seriously deteriorate the crystal quality of the AlGaN layer. Furthermore, the 2DEG mobility will decrease due to the poor interface quality at the AlGaN and GaN layers[11]. In order to combine the advantages of InGaN back barrier and step-graded AlGaN barrier, the novel AlGaN/AlN/GaN/InGaN/GaN HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer has been investigated.
In this study, we focus on the growth and characterization of the InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer. Structural and electrical properties of two structures are investigated and compared. Double crystal X-ray diffraction (DCXRD) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were performed to study the structural properties and crystalline quality, while electrical properties were obtained by the Hall measurements. Benefitting from the optimized structure and improved growth processes, the crystal quality of the AlGaN layer and the properties of the device are better than the results of Ref.[11] in our earlier works.
2.
Device fabrication and experimental setup
The AlGaN/AlN/GaN/InGaN/GaN HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer (sample A) was grown by MOCVD on 2-in c-plane (0001) sapphire substrate, and the schematic cross section of the structure is shown in Fig. 1(a). As a comparison, the Al0.5Ga0.5N/AlN/GaN/InGaN/GaN HEMTs structure with a 25 nm Al0.5Ga0.5N barrier (sample B) shown in Fig. 1(b) was grown under identical growth conditions. After initial desorption in ambient H2 at 1100 ℃, a low temperature (LT) GaN nucleation layer was grown at 530 ℃, subsequently a 3 μm undoped high resistance (HR) GaN buffer layer was grown at 1050 ℃. An InGaN interlayer was grown at 800 ℃ under N2 atmosphere, with 10% indium composition. Ammonia (NH3), triethyl-gallium (TEG) and trimethyl-indium (TMI) were used as source materials. Then the low temperature (LT) GaN spacer layer was grown at 800 ℃, with the thickness of 2-5 nm. High mobility (HM) GaN channel layer was grown at 1000-1100 ℃ under H2 atmosphere, and ammonia (NH3), trimethyl-gallium (TMG) were used as source materials. Subsequently an ultrathin AlN interlayer of about 1 nm was grown at 1000-1100 ℃, followed by a 25 nm undoped compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer, grown at 1000-1100 ℃. The step-graded AlGaN barrier contained a 5 nm Al0.5Ga0.5N layer, a 10 nm Al0.35Ga0.65N layer, and a 10 nm Al0.2Ga0.8N layer along the direction of epilayer growth in sequence. Finally a thin GaN cap layer was grown at 1000-1100 ℃. The indium content in the InGaN interlayer was about 10%, which was determined by both Rutherford backscattering (RBS) and X-ray diffraction measurements. The electrical properties of the heterostructure were studied by Hall and eddy current sheet resistance measurements. The surface morphology of the wafer was characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM).
Figure
1.
Schematics of investigated HEMT structures. (a) The step-graded structure. (b) The high Al structure.
HEMT based on the step-graded structure was fabricated. Ti/Al/Ni/Au metals were deposited in sequence by electron beam evaporation, followed by rapid thermal annealing at 870 ℃ for 30 s in ambient N2. Subsequently the device isolation was realized by using multiple-energy boron (B) ion implantation with an isolation resistance of more than 1011Ω/square. A silicon nitride (SiN) film was then deposited using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The recessed gate etching was performed by dry etching technology, and the Schottky gates with a field plate were formed by electron beam lithography. The gate metallization was realized by using electron-beam evaporated Ni/Au. The drain side edge of the gate metal overlapped the SiN passivation layer, thus forming the field plate. The direct current (DC) measurements of the device were carried out using HP4142 semiconductor parameter analyzers.
3.
Results and discussion
The two samples are characterized by DCXRD measurements. Figure 2 shows ω/2θ scans around (0002) reflection of the two samples. The main strong peaks are the (0002) 0th-order Bragg reflection of thick GaN, and the weak and broad peaks at the right side of the main peaks correspond to the (0002) 0th-order Bragg reflection of thin AlGaN barrier layers. In order to figure out the Al compositions of the AlGaN barriers, we assume that the thin AlGaN barriers are fully strained to the thick GaN layers. Using the method in Ref.[12], the Al compositions of AlGaN barriers in samples A and B are determined to be 34% and 45%. For the step-graded layer, the Al quasi composition is lower than the high Al structure.
Figure
2.
DCXRD spectrums of the two structures. The profiles have been vertically shifted for comparison.
To characterize the crystalline quality of the two samples, we have performed XRD ω-scan on different positions across the 2-inch wafers. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) values as well as standard deviations, determined from the ω-scan XRD rocking curves (RCs) of the (0002) planes of barriers in samples A and B, are shown in Table 1. The density of screw-type threading dislocations (TDs) correlates with the FWHM of ω-scan RC of (0002) planes[13]. From Table 1, one can see that when the Al composition of the barrier increases, FWHM values of (0002) planes increase, indicating more TDs are formed in the barrier layer with higher Al composition. This is consistent with the results published earlier[11]. Using the method developed by Ref.[14], by means of calculating FWHM, the densities of screw-type TDs are 8.34 × 108 cm−2 (sample A), 11.44 × 108 cm−2 (sample B). So it can be concluded that the step-graded structure, which decreases the lattice strain, improves the crystal quality of AlGaN layer.
Table
1.
The electrical properties obtained by Hall measurements, (0002) FWHMs and calculated dislocation densities, as well as data from 2 × 2 μm2 AFM images for the two samples.
In order to investigate the surface morphology of the structures, AFM scan was performed and 2 × 2 μm2 AFM images for the two samples are shown in Fig. 3. Benefitting from the compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer which decreases the lattice strain, the sample exhibits a smooth surface with clear atomic steps and good surface morphology with a low dislocation density. As listed in Table 1, the measured RMS surface roughness is 0.172 nm and 0.232 nm for the samples A and B, respectively. Furthermore, we use the AFM technique for the confirmation of threading dislocation density (TDD) differences among the samples. As demonstrated recently[15], the most adapted technique to determine TDD is AFM which images the pits associated with TDs at their termination on the surface. From Fig. 3 many small pits are visible at the surfaces of the samples. The pit numbers are counted and the pit densities are estimated to be 7.25 × 108 cm−2 and 10.75 × 108 cm−2 for sample A and B, respectively. This implies that TDD increases with the increase of Al composition of the AlGaN barrier, which is consistent with the result of XRD. However, the calculated TDD by AFM is lower than that obtained by XRD. The underestimate of TDD is probably because the size of the pits for TD is very small (≈ 16 nm) and they are only observed in scans smaller than 2 × 2 μm2.
Figure
3.
AFM images of (A) sample A, step-graded structure and (B) sample B, high Al structure (scanning area: 2 × 2 μm2).
The electrical properties of the 2DEG were studied by performing Hall measurement. The 2DEG mobilities and the sheet electron concentrations of the step-graded structure and the high Al structure as a function of temperature are shown in Fig. 4. As listed in Table 1, by using the step-graded barrier structure, the room-temperature 2DEG mobility increases from 1300 to 1820 cm2/(V⋅s). The low temperature mobilities (80 K) of 8770 and 6030 cm2/(V⋅s) are also observed on step-graded and high Al structures, respectively. The decreased strain in the step-graded AlGaN barrier can reduce mismatch dislocation, which actively affects the quality of AlN/GaN interface. Thus, we speculate that the significant improvement in the 2DEG mobility for the step-graded structure is mainly attributed to the high AlN/GaN interface quality. Furthermore, the AlN interfacial layer will confine the electrons nearly exclusively to the binary compounds and almost completely eliminate scattering due to alloy disorder, as reported in Refs.[16, 17]. The high mobility also benefits from the divided GaN layers' growth which consist of the GaN channel layer that provides high mobility 2DEG and GaN spacer layer that was grown at low temperature to prevent indium cluster formation and indium diffusion. Compared to the high Al structure, the step-graded structure with the same AlGaN barrier thickness has less total Al content in the barrier, and therefore has lower 2DEG sheet density due to the reduction of polarization. Another attractive advantage of the step-graded structure with the InGaN back barrier, i.e. the 2DEG sheet density is independent of the measurement temperature, which indicates that the 2DEG is very well confined in the GaN channel layer.
Figure
4.
Variations of the Hall mobility and sheet carrier concentration with temperature for the two samples.
The typical sheet resistance and resistance uniformity measurement results for the step-graded structure are shown in Fig. 5, which was conducted by Lehighton contactless sheet resistivity mapping across the 2-inch wafer. The wafer displays an average sheet resistance of 380 Ω/◻, with a sheet resistance non-uniformity of 3.68%. The relation of sheet resistance with 2DEG sheet density ns and mobility can be given by
Rs=ρt=1σt=1(nqμ)t=1nt1μq=1qnsμ,
(1)
Figure
5.
Sheet resistance mapping of the 2-in diameter compositionally step-graded HEMTs structure wafer.
where ρ is the resistivity, σ is the conductivity, q is the electric charge, and t is the 2DEG width along the growth direction in the triangular quantum well. From the results of Hall measurement, the calculated value of sheet resistance is about 404 Ω/◻, which is consistent with the result of Lehighton contactless sheet resistivity mapping.
According to the results of AFM, XRD, Hall measurements and sheet resistance mapping, the grown step-graded structure with InGaN back barrier is very suitable for the device fabrication. For the high Al content HEMTs structure, the large lattice mismatch between AlGaN and GaN (Δa/a= 1.21%) results in high tensile stress in the AlGaN layer. Thus, more strain-induced defects are formed, leading to the degradation of the surface morphology and crystal quality. However, for the step-graded structure, the lattice mismatch Δa/a decreases gradually with the step-like decrease of the Al composition in the AlGaN layer, from 1.21% and 0.85% to 0.16%, as shown in Table 2. Thus the lattice strain decreases correspondingly step by step, therefore the total strain in the AlGaN layer decreases compared with the high Al structure and realizes high surface and crystal quality.
Table
2.
Lattice mismatch △a/a of the compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer on GaN.
HEMT based on the InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer was fabricated. Typical current-voltage (Ids-Vds) and transfer characteristics of the device with 0.35 μm × 1 mm gate periphery are illustrated in Figs. 6(a) and 6(b). The maximum drain current density is obtained to be 713.8 mA/mm at a gate bias of 1 V. The maximum extrinsic transconductance is 376.3 mS/mm at a gate bias of -1 V. The device pinched off completely at a gate bias of -2.8 V. Furthermore, the transconductance (gm) is quite flat after onset and remains close to its peak value at high current levels, which shows a good linearity.
Figure
6.
Electrical performances of the step-graded structure. (a) DC Ids-Vds characteristics. (b) DC transfer characteristics.
The off-state Ids-Vds characteristic of the step-graded structure at the gate voltage of -3 V is shown in Fig. 7. As seen, the leakage current is only 28 μA when the drain voltage is 10 V, which indicates the structure has a good isolation of GaN buffer. The low leakage current for the device is mainly due to the improved 2DEG confinement by the InGaN back-barrier, which is caused by the opposite piezoelectric polarization in the InGaN layer compared to the AlGaN layer[9, 10]. Therefore electrons spilling over into the buffer layer is effectively avoided and the buffer leakage current is greatly reduced in the device. The optimized thickness of InGaN layer in the structures has been investigated and reported in our earlier works[9].
Figure
7.Ids-Vds characteristic of the step-graded structure at the gate voltage of -3 V.
These results are better than those of the InGaN channel HEMTs[18] and the step-graded AlGaN/AlN/GaN HEMTs[11] in our earlier works.
4.
Conclusion
The structural and electrical properties of AlGaN/AlN/GaN/InGaN/GaN HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer were studied. The densities of screw-type threading dislocations are 8.34 × 108 cm−2 and 11.44 × 108 cm−2 for the step-graded structure and the high Al structure, respectively, which are consistent with the results of AFM. The AFM result of this structure shows a good surface morphology. The measured 2DEG mobility was 1820 cm2/(V⋅s) for the step-graded structure, 1300 cm2/ (V⋅s) for the high Al structure, respectively. It can be concluded that the step-graded structure, which decreases the lattice strain, improves the crystal quality of AlGaN layer. The HEMTs device using the material was fabricated, and a maximum drain current density of 713.8 mA/mm and an extrinsic transconductance of 376.3 mS/mm are achieved, which are better than our earlier work.
References
[1]
Wang X L, Cheng T S, Xiao H L, et al. An internally-matched GaN HEMTs device with 45.2 W at 8 GHz for X-band application. Solid-State Electron, 2009, 53:332 doi: 10.1016/j.sse.2009.01.003
[2]
Ren Chunjiang, Li Zhonghui, Yu Xuming, et al. Field plated 0.15μm GaN HEMTs for millimeter-wave application. Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(6):064002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/6/064002
[3]
Wang Jianhui, Wang Xinhua, Pan Lei, et al. Effect of varying layouts on the gate temperature for multi-finger AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(9):094004 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/9/094004
[4]
Zhang Renping, Yan Wei, Wang Xiaoliang, et al. Fabrication and characterization of high performance AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on sapphire with silicon nitride passivation. Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(6):064001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/6/064001
[5]
Manuel J M, Morales F M, Garcia R, et al. Threading dislocation propagation in AlGaN/GaN based HEMT structures grown on Si (111) by plasma assisted molecular beam epitaxy. J Cryst Growth, 2012, 357:35 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.07.037
[6]
Schuette M L, Ketterson A, Song B, et al. Gate-recessed integrated E/D GaN HEMT technology with fT/fmax > 300 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2013, 34(6):741 doi: 10.1109/LED.2013.2257657
[7]
Benyahya N, Mazari H, Benseddik N, et al. Characterization and comparison between Ig(Vgs) structures HEMT AlInN/GaN and AlGaN/GaN. Opt Quantum Electron, 2014, 46(1):209 doi: 10.1007/s11082-013-9747-4
[8]
Palacios T, Chakraborty A, Heikman S, et al. AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors with InGaN back-barriers. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2006, 27:13 doi: 10.1109/LED.2005.860882
[9]
Tang J, Wang X, Chen T, et al. AlGaN/AlN/GaN/InGaN/GaN DH-HEMTs with improved mobility grown by MOCVD. 9th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated-Circuit Technology, ICSICT, 2008:1114 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4734732
[10]
Shi Linyu, Zhang Jincheng, Wang Hao, et al. Growth of InGaN and double heterojunction structure with InGaN back barrier. Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(12):123001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/12/123001
[11]
Ma Z Y, Wang X L, Hu G X, et al. Growth and characterization of AlGaN/AlN/GaN HEMT structures with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer. Chin Phys Lett, 2007, 24:1705 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/24/6/075
[12]
Moram M A, Vickers M E. X-ray diffraction of Ⅲ-nitrides. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2009, 72:036502 doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/72/3/036502
[13]
Lu L, Shen B, Xu F J, et al. Morphology of threading dislocations in high-resistivity GaN films observed by transmission electron microscopy. J Appl Phys, 2007, 102(3):033510 doi: 10.1063/1.2768015
[14]
Srikant V, Speck J S, Clarke D R. Mosaic structure in epitaxial thin films having large lattice mismatch. J Appl Phys, 1997, 82(9):4286 doi: 10.1063/1.366235
[15]
Khoury M, Courville A, Poulet B, et al. Imaging and counting threading dislocations in c-oriented epitaxial GaN layers. Semicond Sci Technol, 2013, 28:035006 doi: 10.1088/0268-1242/28/3/035006
[16]
Shen L, Heikman S, Moran B, et al. AlGaN/AlN/GaN high-power microwave HEMT. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2001, 22:457 doi: 10.1109/55.954910
[17]
Skierbiszewski C, Wasilewski Z, Siekacz M, et al. Growth optimisation of the GaN layers and GaN/AlGaN heterojunctions on bulk GaN substrates using plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy. Phys Status Solidi A, 2004, 201(2):320 doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-396X
[18]
Ran J X, Wang X L, Hu G X, et al. Characteristics of InGaN channel HEMTs grown by MOCVD. 8th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology, 2006, 2:929 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4098280
Fig. 1.
Schematics of investigated HEMT structures. (a) The step-graded structure. (b) The high Al structure.
Table 1.
The electrical properties obtained by Hall measurements, (0002) FWHMs and calculated dislocation densities, as well as data from 2 × 2 μm2 AFM images for the two samples.
Table 2.
Lattice mismatch △a/a of the compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer on GaN.
[1]
Wang X L, Cheng T S, Xiao H L, et al. An internally-matched GaN HEMTs device with 45.2 W at 8 GHz for X-band application. Solid-State Electron, 2009, 53:332 doi: 10.1016/j.sse.2009.01.003
[2]
Ren Chunjiang, Li Zhonghui, Yu Xuming, et al. Field plated 0.15μm GaN HEMTs for millimeter-wave application. Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(6):064002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/6/064002
[3]
Wang Jianhui, Wang Xinhua, Pan Lei, et al. Effect of varying layouts on the gate temperature for multi-finger AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(9):094004 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/9/094004
[4]
Zhang Renping, Yan Wei, Wang Xiaoliang, et al. Fabrication and characterization of high performance AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on sapphire with silicon nitride passivation. Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(6):064001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/6/064001
[5]
Manuel J M, Morales F M, Garcia R, et al. Threading dislocation propagation in AlGaN/GaN based HEMT structures grown on Si (111) by plasma assisted molecular beam epitaxy. J Cryst Growth, 2012, 357:35 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.07.037
[6]
Schuette M L, Ketterson A, Song B, et al. Gate-recessed integrated E/D GaN HEMT technology with fT/fmax > 300 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2013, 34(6):741 doi: 10.1109/LED.2013.2257657
[7]
Benyahya N, Mazari H, Benseddik N, et al. Characterization and comparison between Ig(Vgs) structures HEMT AlInN/GaN and AlGaN/GaN. Opt Quantum Electron, 2014, 46(1):209 doi: 10.1007/s11082-013-9747-4
[8]
Palacios T, Chakraborty A, Heikman S, et al. AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors with InGaN back-barriers. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2006, 27:13 doi: 10.1109/LED.2005.860882
[9]
Tang J, Wang X, Chen T, et al. AlGaN/AlN/GaN/InGaN/GaN DH-HEMTs with improved mobility grown by MOCVD. 9th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated-Circuit Technology, ICSICT, 2008:1114 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4734732
[10]
Shi Linyu, Zhang Jincheng, Wang Hao, et al. Growth of InGaN and double heterojunction structure with InGaN back barrier. Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(12):123001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/12/123001
[11]
Ma Z Y, Wang X L, Hu G X, et al. Growth and characterization of AlGaN/AlN/GaN HEMT structures with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer. Chin Phys Lett, 2007, 24:1705 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/24/6/075
[12]
Moram M A, Vickers M E. X-ray diffraction of Ⅲ-nitrides. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2009, 72:036502 doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/72/3/036502
[13]
Lu L, Shen B, Xu F J, et al. Morphology of threading dislocations in high-resistivity GaN films observed by transmission electron microscopy. J Appl Phys, 2007, 102(3):033510 doi: 10.1063/1.2768015
[14]
Srikant V, Speck J S, Clarke D R. Mosaic structure in epitaxial thin films having large lattice mismatch. J Appl Phys, 1997, 82(9):4286 doi: 10.1063/1.366235
[15]
Khoury M, Courville A, Poulet B, et al. Imaging and counting threading dislocations in c-oriented epitaxial GaN layers. Semicond Sci Technol, 2013, 28:035006 doi: 10.1088/0268-1242/28/3/035006
[16]
Shen L, Heikman S, Moran B, et al. AlGaN/AlN/GaN high-power microwave HEMT. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2001, 22:457 doi: 10.1109/55.954910
[17]
Skierbiszewski C, Wasilewski Z, Siekacz M, et al. Growth optimisation of the GaN layers and GaN/AlGaN heterojunctions on bulk GaN substrates using plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy. Phys Status Solidi A, 2004, 201(2):320 doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-396X
[18]
Ran J X, Wang X L, Hu G X, et al. Characteristics of InGaN channel HEMTs grown by MOCVD. 8th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology, 2006, 2:929 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4098280
Zeng Qingming, Li Xianjie, Zhou Zhou, Wang Yong, Wang Xiaoliang, et al.
Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(S1): 151-154.
Search
GET CITATION
Jian Tang, Xiaoliang Wang, Hongling Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006
J Tang, X L Wang, H L Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006.
Export: BibTexEndNote
Share:
Article Metrics
Article views: 2856 TimesPDF downloads: 25 TimesCited by: 0 Times
History
Received: 05 March 2014Revised: 05 May 2014Online:Published: 01 November 2014
Jian Tang, Xiaoliang Wang, Hongling Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006 ****J Tang, X L Wang, H L Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006.
Citation:
Jian Tang, Xiaoliang Wang, Hongling Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006
****
J Tang, X L Wang, H L Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006.
Jian Tang, Xiaoliang Wang, Hongling Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006 ****J Tang, X L Wang, H L Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006.
Citation:
Jian Tang, Xiaoliang Wang, Hongling Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006
****
J Tang, X L Wang, H L Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006.
A novel InGaN back barrier high electron mobility transistors structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer was grown by metal organic chemical vapor deposition on sapphire substrate. The structural and electrical properties of two samples were investigated and compared:the first sample is the step-graded structure and the second one is the high Al structure as a comparison. By calculating full width at half maximum of XRD measurements, the densities of screw-type threading dislocations are 8.34×108 cm-2 and 11.44×108 cm-2 for step-graded structure and high Al structure, respectively, which are consistent with the results of atomic force microscopy. By Hall measurements, the measured two-dimensional electron gas mobility was 1820 cm2/(V·s) for step-graded structure, and 1300 cm2/(V·s) for high Al structure, respectively. The step-graded structure improves the crystal quality of AlGaN layer due to the released lattice strain. The device was fabricated and leakage current is only 28 μA when the drain voltage is 10 V; it was found that the InGaN back barrier could effectively reduce the buffer leakage current.
Conventional AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) have shown excellent performances in high-frequency applications, for the advantages associated with GaN-based wide band gap semiconductors which include the high breakdown fields, high peak electron and saturation drift velocities, and very high sheet charge densities at the interface resulting from large conduction band offset and strong polarization effects[1-5]. Many new and advanced device structures are being explored, and material quality and device processing are ameliorated[6, 7]. For the larger conduction band offset and higher polarization charge density at the interface, high Al content AlGaN/GaN heterostructures have been demonstrated, and Palacios et al. demonstrated the AlGaN/GaN/InGaN/GaN HEMTs structure with improved buffer isolation[8], and an improved structure with higher 2DEG mobility was reported[9, 10]. In our earlier research, the AlGaN/AlN/GaN structure with the step-graded AlGaN barrier layer was demonstrated, which improved the crystal quality of high Al content AlGaN layer[11]. However, high Al content AlGaN barrier results in a larger conduction-band discontinuity and a higher barrier that help confine the 2DEG. But the increased lattice mismatch and strain associated with high Al content seriously deteriorate the crystal quality of the AlGaN layer. Furthermore, the 2DEG mobility will decrease due to the poor interface quality at the AlGaN and GaN layers[11]. In order to combine the advantages of InGaN back barrier and step-graded AlGaN barrier, the novel AlGaN/AlN/GaN/InGaN/GaN HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer has been investigated.
In this study, we focus on the growth and characterization of the InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer. Structural and electrical properties of two structures are investigated and compared. Double crystal X-ray diffraction (DCXRD) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were performed to study the structural properties and crystalline quality, while electrical properties were obtained by the Hall measurements. Benefitting from the optimized structure and improved growth processes, the crystal quality of the AlGaN layer and the properties of the device are better than the results of Ref.[11] in our earlier works.
2.
Device fabrication and experimental setup
The AlGaN/AlN/GaN/InGaN/GaN HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer (sample A) was grown by MOCVD on 2-in c-plane (0001) sapphire substrate, and the schematic cross section of the structure is shown in Fig. 1(a). As a comparison, the Al0.5Ga0.5N/AlN/GaN/InGaN/GaN HEMTs structure with a 25 nm Al0.5Ga0.5N barrier (sample B) shown in Fig. 1(b) was grown under identical growth conditions. After initial desorption in ambient H2 at 1100 ℃, a low temperature (LT) GaN nucleation layer was grown at 530 ℃, subsequently a 3 μm undoped high resistance (HR) GaN buffer layer was grown at 1050 ℃. An InGaN interlayer was grown at 800 ℃ under N2 atmosphere, with 10% indium composition. Ammonia (NH3), triethyl-gallium (TEG) and trimethyl-indium (TMI) were used as source materials. Then the low temperature (LT) GaN spacer layer was grown at 800 ℃, with the thickness of 2-5 nm. High mobility (HM) GaN channel layer was grown at 1000-1100 ℃ under H2 atmosphere, and ammonia (NH3), trimethyl-gallium (TMG) were used as source materials. Subsequently an ultrathin AlN interlayer of about 1 nm was grown at 1000-1100 ℃, followed by a 25 nm undoped compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer, grown at 1000-1100 ℃. The step-graded AlGaN barrier contained a 5 nm Al0.5Ga0.5N layer, a 10 nm Al0.35Ga0.65N layer, and a 10 nm Al0.2Ga0.8N layer along the direction of epilayer growth in sequence. Finally a thin GaN cap layer was grown at 1000-1100 ℃. The indium content in the InGaN interlayer was about 10%, which was determined by both Rutherford backscattering (RBS) and X-ray diffraction measurements. The electrical properties of the heterostructure were studied by Hall and eddy current sheet resistance measurements. The surface morphology of the wafer was characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM).
Figure
1.
Schematics of investigated HEMT structures. (a) The step-graded structure. (b) The high Al structure.
HEMT based on the step-graded structure was fabricated. Ti/Al/Ni/Au metals were deposited in sequence by electron beam evaporation, followed by rapid thermal annealing at 870 ℃ for 30 s in ambient N2. Subsequently the device isolation was realized by using multiple-energy boron (B) ion implantation with an isolation resistance of more than 1011Ω/square. A silicon nitride (SiN) film was then deposited using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The recessed gate etching was performed by dry etching technology, and the Schottky gates with a field plate were formed by electron beam lithography. The gate metallization was realized by using electron-beam evaporated Ni/Au. The drain side edge of the gate metal overlapped the SiN passivation layer, thus forming the field plate. The direct current (DC) measurements of the device were carried out using HP4142 semiconductor parameter analyzers.
3.
Results and discussion
The two samples are characterized by DCXRD measurements. Figure 2 shows ω/2θ scans around (0002) reflection of the two samples. The main strong peaks are the (0002) 0th-order Bragg reflection of thick GaN, and the weak and broad peaks at the right side of the main peaks correspond to the (0002) 0th-order Bragg reflection of thin AlGaN barrier layers. In order to figure out the Al compositions of the AlGaN barriers, we assume that the thin AlGaN barriers are fully strained to the thick GaN layers. Using the method in Ref.[12], the Al compositions of AlGaN barriers in samples A and B are determined to be 34% and 45%. For the step-graded layer, the Al quasi composition is lower than the high Al structure.
Figure
2.
DCXRD spectrums of the two structures. The profiles have been vertically shifted for comparison.
To characterize the crystalline quality of the two samples, we have performed XRD ω-scan on different positions across the 2-inch wafers. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) values as well as standard deviations, determined from the ω-scan XRD rocking curves (RCs) of the (0002) planes of barriers in samples A and B, are shown in Table 1. The density of screw-type threading dislocations (TDs) correlates with the FWHM of ω-scan RC of (0002) planes[13]. From Table 1, one can see that when the Al composition of the barrier increases, FWHM values of (0002) planes increase, indicating more TDs are formed in the barrier layer with higher Al composition. This is consistent with the results published earlier[11]. Using the method developed by Ref.[14], by means of calculating FWHM, the densities of screw-type TDs are 8.34 × 108 cm−2 (sample A), 11.44 × 108 cm−2 (sample B). So it can be concluded that the step-graded structure, which decreases the lattice strain, improves the crystal quality of AlGaN layer.
Table
1.
The electrical properties obtained by Hall measurements, (0002) FWHMs and calculated dislocation densities, as well as data from 2 × 2 μm2 AFM images for the two samples.
In order to investigate the surface morphology of the structures, AFM scan was performed and 2 × 2 μm2 AFM images for the two samples are shown in Fig. 3. Benefitting from the compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer which decreases the lattice strain, the sample exhibits a smooth surface with clear atomic steps and good surface morphology with a low dislocation density. As listed in Table 1, the measured RMS surface roughness is 0.172 nm and 0.232 nm for the samples A and B, respectively. Furthermore, we use the AFM technique for the confirmation of threading dislocation density (TDD) differences among the samples. As demonstrated recently[15], the most adapted technique to determine TDD is AFM which images the pits associated with TDs at their termination on the surface. From Fig. 3 many small pits are visible at the surfaces of the samples. The pit numbers are counted and the pit densities are estimated to be 7.25 × 108 cm−2 and 10.75 × 108 cm−2 for sample A and B, respectively. This implies that TDD increases with the increase of Al composition of the AlGaN barrier, which is consistent with the result of XRD. However, the calculated TDD by AFM is lower than that obtained by XRD. The underestimate of TDD is probably because the size of the pits for TD is very small (≈ 16 nm) and they are only observed in scans smaller than 2 × 2 μm2.
Figure
3.
AFM images of (A) sample A, step-graded structure and (B) sample B, high Al structure (scanning area: 2 × 2 μm2).
The electrical properties of the 2DEG were studied by performing Hall measurement. The 2DEG mobilities and the sheet electron concentrations of the step-graded structure and the high Al structure as a function of temperature are shown in Fig. 4. As listed in Table 1, by using the step-graded barrier structure, the room-temperature 2DEG mobility increases from 1300 to 1820 cm2/(V⋅s). The low temperature mobilities (80 K) of 8770 and 6030 cm2/(V⋅s) are also observed on step-graded and high Al structures, respectively. The decreased strain in the step-graded AlGaN barrier can reduce mismatch dislocation, which actively affects the quality of AlN/GaN interface. Thus, we speculate that the significant improvement in the 2DEG mobility for the step-graded structure is mainly attributed to the high AlN/GaN interface quality. Furthermore, the AlN interfacial layer will confine the electrons nearly exclusively to the binary compounds and almost completely eliminate scattering due to alloy disorder, as reported in Refs.[16, 17]. The high mobility also benefits from the divided GaN layers' growth which consist of the GaN channel layer that provides high mobility 2DEG and GaN spacer layer that was grown at low temperature to prevent indium cluster formation and indium diffusion. Compared to the high Al structure, the step-graded structure with the same AlGaN barrier thickness has less total Al content in the barrier, and therefore has lower 2DEG sheet density due to the reduction of polarization. Another attractive advantage of the step-graded structure with the InGaN back barrier, i.e. the 2DEG sheet density is independent of the measurement temperature, which indicates that the 2DEG is very well confined in the GaN channel layer.
Figure
4.
Variations of the Hall mobility and sheet carrier concentration with temperature for the two samples.
The typical sheet resistance and resistance uniformity measurement results for the step-graded structure are shown in Fig. 5, which was conducted by Lehighton contactless sheet resistivity mapping across the 2-inch wafer. The wafer displays an average sheet resistance of 380 Ω/◻, with a sheet resistance non-uniformity of 3.68%. The relation of sheet resistance with 2DEG sheet density ns and mobility can be given by
where ρ is the resistivity, σ is the conductivity, q is the electric charge, and t is the 2DEG width along the growth direction in the triangular quantum well. From the results of Hall measurement, the calculated value of sheet resistance is about 404 Ω/◻, which is consistent with the result of Lehighton contactless sheet resistivity mapping.
According to the results of AFM, XRD, Hall measurements and sheet resistance mapping, the grown step-graded structure with InGaN back barrier is very suitable for the device fabrication. For the high Al content HEMTs structure, the large lattice mismatch between AlGaN and GaN (Δa/a= 1.21%) results in high tensile stress in the AlGaN layer. Thus, more strain-induced defects are formed, leading to the degradation of the surface morphology and crystal quality. However, for the step-graded structure, the lattice mismatch Δa/a decreases gradually with the step-like decrease of the Al composition in the AlGaN layer, from 1.21% and 0.85% to 0.16%, as shown in Table 2. Thus the lattice strain decreases correspondingly step by step, therefore the total strain in the AlGaN layer decreases compared with the high Al structure and realizes high surface and crystal quality.
Table
2.
Lattice mismatch △a/a of the compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer on GaN.
HEMT based on the InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer was fabricated. Typical current-voltage (Ids-Vds) and transfer characteristics of the device with 0.35 μm × 1 mm gate periphery are illustrated in Figs. 6(a) and 6(b). The maximum drain current density is obtained to be 713.8 mA/mm at a gate bias of 1 V. The maximum extrinsic transconductance is 376.3 mS/mm at a gate bias of -1 V. The device pinched off completely at a gate bias of -2.8 V. Furthermore, the transconductance (gm) is quite flat after onset and remains close to its peak value at high current levels, which shows a good linearity.
Figure
6.
Electrical performances of the step-graded structure. (a) DC Ids-Vds characteristics. (b) DC transfer characteristics.
The off-state Ids-Vds characteristic of the step-graded structure at the gate voltage of -3 V is shown in Fig. 7. As seen, the leakage current is only 28 μA when the drain voltage is 10 V, which indicates the structure has a good isolation of GaN buffer. The low leakage current for the device is mainly due to the improved 2DEG confinement by the InGaN back-barrier, which is caused by the opposite piezoelectric polarization in the InGaN layer compared to the AlGaN layer[9, 10]. Therefore electrons spilling over into the buffer layer is effectively avoided and the buffer leakage current is greatly reduced in the device. The optimized thickness of InGaN layer in the structures has been investigated and reported in our earlier works[9].
Figure
7.Ids-Vds characteristic of the step-graded structure at the gate voltage of -3 V.
These results are better than those of the InGaN channel HEMTs[18] and the step-graded AlGaN/AlN/GaN HEMTs[11] in our earlier works.
4.
Conclusion
The structural and electrical properties of AlGaN/AlN/GaN/InGaN/GaN HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer were studied. The densities of screw-type threading dislocations are 8.34 × 108 cm−2 and 11.44 × 108 cm−2 for the step-graded structure and the high Al structure, respectively, which are consistent with the results of AFM. The AFM result of this structure shows a good surface morphology. The measured 2DEG mobility was 1820 cm2/(V⋅s) for the step-graded structure, 1300 cm2/ (V⋅s) for the high Al structure, respectively. It can be concluded that the step-graded structure, which decreases the lattice strain, improves the crystal quality of AlGaN layer. The HEMTs device using the material was fabricated, and a maximum drain current density of 713.8 mA/mm and an extrinsic transconductance of 376.3 mS/mm are achieved, which are better than our earlier work.
Wang X L, Cheng T S, Xiao H L, et al. An internally-matched GaN HEMTs device with 45.2 W at 8 GHz for X-band application. Solid-State Electron, 2009, 53:332 doi: 10.1016/j.sse.2009.01.003
[2]
Ren Chunjiang, Li Zhonghui, Yu Xuming, et al. Field plated 0.15μm GaN HEMTs for millimeter-wave application. Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(6):064002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/6/064002
[3]
Wang Jianhui, Wang Xinhua, Pan Lei, et al. Effect of varying layouts on the gate temperature for multi-finger AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(9):094004 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/9/094004
[4]
Zhang Renping, Yan Wei, Wang Xiaoliang, et al. Fabrication and characterization of high performance AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on sapphire with silicon nitride passivation. Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(6):064001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/6/064001
[5]
Manuel J M, Morales F M, Garcia R, et al. Threading dislocation propagation in AlGaN/GaN based HEMT structures grown on Si (111) by plasma assisted molecular beam epitaxy. J Cryst Growth, 2012, 357:35 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.07.037
[6]
Schuette M L, Ketterson A, Song B, et al. Gate-recessed integrated E/D GaN HEMT technology with fT/fmax > 300 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2013, 34(6):741 doi: 10.1109/LED.2013.2257657
[7]
Benyahya N, Mazari H, Benseddik N, et al. Characterization and comparison between Ig(Vgs) structures HEMT AlInN/GaN and AlGaN/GaN. Opt Quantum Electron, 2014, 46(1):209 doi: 10.1007/s11082-013-9747-4
[8]
Palacios T, Chakraborty A, Heikman S, et al. AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors with InGaN back-barriers. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2006, 27:13 doi: 10.1109/LED.2005.860882
[9]
Tang J, Wang X, Chen T, et al. AlGaN/AlN/GaN/InGaN/GaN DH-HEMTs with improved mobility grown by MOCVD. 9th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated-Circuit Technology, ICSICT, 2008:1114 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4734732
[10]
Shi Linyu, Zhang Jincheng, Wang Hao, et al. Growth of InGaN and double heterojunction structure with InGaN back barrier. Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(12):123001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/12/123001
[11]
Ma Z Y, Wang X L, Hu G X, et al. Growth and characterization of AlGaN/AlN/GaN HEMT structures with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN barrier layer. Chin Phys Lett, 2007, 24:1705 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/24/6/075
[12]
Moram M A, Vickers M E. X-ray diffraction of Ⅲ-nitrides. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2009, 72:036502 doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/72/3/036502
[13]
Lu L, Shen B, Xu F J, et al. Morphology of threading dislocations in high-resistivity GaN films observed by transmission electron microscopy. J Appl Phys, 2007, 102(3):033510 doi: 10.1063/1.2768015
[14]
Srikant V, Speck J S, Clarke D R. Mosaic structure in epitaxial thin films having large lattice mismatch. J Appl Phys, 1997, 82(9):4286 doi: 10.1063/1.366235
[15]
Khoury M, Courville A, Poulet B, et al. Imaging and counting threading dislocations in c-oriented epitaxial GaN layers. Semicond Sci Technol, 2013, 28:035006 doi: 10.1088/0268-1242/28/3/035006
[16]
Shen L, Heikman S, Moran B, et al. AlGaN/AlN/GaN high-power microwave HEMT. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2001, 22:457 doi: 10.1109/55.954910
[17]
Skierbiszewski C, Wasilewski Z, Siekacz M, et al. Growth optimisation of the GaN layers and GaN/AlGaN heterojunctions on bulk GaN substrates using plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy. Phys Status Solidi A, 2004, 201(2):320 doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-396X
[18]
Ran J X, Wang X L, Hu G X, et al. Characteristics of InGaN channel HEMTs grown by MOCVD. 8th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology, 2006, 2:929 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4098280
Jian Tang, Xiaoliang Wang, Hongling Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006 ****J Tang, X L Wang, H L Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006.
Jian Tang, Xiaoliang Wang, Hongling Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006
****
J Tang, X L Wang, H L Xiao. Growth and characterization of InGaN back barrier HEMTs structure with a compositionally step-graded AlGaN layer[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(11): 113006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/113006.
Table
1.
The electrical properties obtained by Hall measurements, (0002) FWHMs and calculated dislocation densities, as well as data from 2 × 2 μm2 AFM images for the two samples.