Citation: |
Mengke Wang, Shangjian Zhang, Zhao Liu, Xuyan Zhang, Yutong He, Yangxue Ma, Yali Zhang, Zhiyao Zhang, Yong Liu. High-frequency characterization of high-speed modulators and photodetectors in a link with low-speed photonic sampling[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(4): 042303. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/4/042303
****
M K Wang, S J Zhang, Z Liu, X Y Zhang, Y T He, Y X Ma, Y L Zhang, Z Y Zhang, Y Liu, High-frequency characterization of high-speed modulators and photodetectors in a link with low-speed photonic sampling[J]. J. Semicond., 2021, 42(4): 042303. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/4/042303.
|
High-frequency characterization of high-speed modulators and photodetectors in a link with low-speed photonic sampling
DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/4/042303
More Information
-
Abstract
We propose a low-speed photonic sampling for independent high-frequency characterization of a Mach–Zehnder modulator (MZM) and a photodetector (PD) in an optical link. A low-speed mode-locked laser diode (MLLD) provides an ultra-wideband optical stimulus with scalable frequency range, working as the photonic sampling source of the link. The uneven spectrum lines of the MLLD are firstly characterized with symmetric modulation within the interesting frequency range. Then, the electro-optic modulated signals are down-converted to the first Nyquist frequency range, yielding the self-referenced extraction of modulation depth and half-wave voltage of the MZM without correcting the responsivity fluctuation of the PD in the link. Finally, the frequency responsivity of the PD is self-referenced measured under null modulation of the MZM. As frequency responses of the MZM and the PD can be independently obtained, our method allows self-referenced high-frequency measurement for a high-speed optical link. In the proof-of-concept experiment, a 96.9 MS/s MLLD is used for measuring a MZM and a PD within the frequency range up to 50 GHz. The consistency between our method and the conventional method verifies that the ultra-wideband and self-referenced high-frequency characterization of high-speed MZMs and PDs. -
References
[1] Capmany J, Mora J, Gasulla I, et al. Microwave photonic signal processing. J Lightwave Technol, 2013, 31(4), 571 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2012.2222348[2] Marpaung D, Yao J P, Capmany J. Integrated microwave photonics. Nat Photon, 2019, 13(1), 80 doi: 10.1002/lpor.201200032[3] Yi X K, Chew S X, Song S J, et al. Integrated microwave photonics for wideband signal processing. Photonics, 2017, 4(4), 46 doi: 10.3390/photonics4040046[4] Wang C, Zhang M, Chen X, et al. Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages. Nature, 2018, 562(7725), 101 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0551-y[5] Sun K, Beling A. High-speed photodetector for microwave photonics. Appl Sci, 2019, 9(4), 623 doi: 10.3390/app9040623[6] Shi Y Q, Yan L S, Willner A E. High-speed electrooptic modulator characterization using optical spectrum analysis. J Lightwave Technol, 2003, 21(10), 2358 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2003.818162[7] Liao Y, Zhou H J, Meng Z. Modulation efficiency of a LiNbO3 waveguide electro-optic intensity modulator operating at high microwave frequency. Opt Lett, 2009, 34(12), 1822 doi: 10.1364/OL.34.001822[8] Ye Q Y, Yang C, Chong Y H. Improved frequency response measurement method of half-wave voltage for phase modulator. Optik, 2014, 125(2), 745 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.07.042[9] Rideout W, Eichen E, Schlafer J, et al. Relative intensity noise in semiconductor optical amplifiers. IEEE Photon Technol Lett, 1989, 1(12), 438 doi: 10.1109/68.46042[10] Eichen E, Schlafer J, Rideout W, et al. Wide-bandwidth receiver photodetector frequency response measurements using amplified spontaneous emission from a semiconductor optical amplifier. J Lightwave Technol, 1990, 8(6), 912 doi: 10.1109/50.54509[11] Xie F Z, Kuhl D, Böttcher E H, et al. Wide-band frequency response measurements of photodetectors using low-level photocurrent noise detection. J Appl Phys, 1993, 73(12), 8641 doi: 10.1063/1.353397[12] Baney D M, Sorin W V, Newton S A. High-frequency photodiode characterization using a filtered intensity noise technique. IEEE Photon Technol Lett, 1994, 6(10), 1258 doi: 10.1109/68.329656[13] Shao Y, Gallawa R L. Fiber bandwidth measurement using pulse spectrum analysis. Appl Opt, 1986, 25(7), 1069 doi: 10.1364/AO.25.001069[14] Hawkins R T, Jones M D, Pepper S H, et al. Comparison of fast photodetector response measurements by optical heterodyne and pulse response techniques. J Lightwave Technol, 1991, 9(10), 1289 doi: 10.1109/50.90926[15] Wang L X, Zhu N H, Ke J H, et al. Improved peak power method for measuring frequency responses of photodetectors in a self-heterodyne system. Microw Opt Technol Lett, 2010, 52(10), 2199 doi: 10.1002/mop.25448[16] Miao A, Huang Y Q, Huang H, et al. Wideband calibration of photodetector frequency response based on optical heterodyne measurement. Microw Opt Technol Lett, 2009, 51(1), 44 doi: 10.1002/mop.23957[17] Koch C. Measuring the photodetector frequency response for ultrasonic applications by a heterodyne system with difference-frequency servo control. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr, 2010, 57(5), 1169 doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2010/1529[18] Dennis T, Hale P D. High-accuracy photoreceiver frequency response measurements at 1.55 µm by use of a heterodyne phase-locked loop. Opt Express, 2011, 19(21), 20103 doi: 10.1364/OE.19.020103[19] Feng X J, Yang P, He L B, et al. Heterodyne system for measuring frequency response of photodetectors in ultrasonic applications. IEEE Photon Technol Lett, 2016, 28(12), 1360 doi: 10.1109/LPT.2016.2542839[20] Hale P D, Williams D F. Calibrated measurement of optoelectronic frequency response. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 2003, 51(4), 1422 doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2003.809186[21] Wu X M, Man J W, Xie L, et al. Novel method for frequency response measurement of optoelectronic devices. IEEE Photon Technol Lett, 2012, 24(7), 575 doi: 10.1109/LPT.2012.2183122[22] Ye Q Y, Yang C, Chong Y H. Measuring the frequency response of photodiode using phase-modulated interferometric detection. IEEE Photon Technol Lett, 2013, 26(1), 29 doi: 10.1109/LPT.2013.2280767[23] Wu X M, Man J W, Xie L, et al. A new method for measuring the frequency response of broadband optoelectronic devices. IEEE Photon J, 2012, 4(5), 1679 doi: 10.1109/JPHOT.2012.2213297[24] Zhang S J, Zhang C, Wang H, et al. Self-calibrated microwave characterization of high-speed optoelectronic devices by heterodyne spectrum mapping. J Lightwave Technol, 2017, 35(10), 1952 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2017.2678978[25] Zhang S J, Zhang C, Wang H, et al. On-wafer probing-kit for RF characterization of silicon photonic integrated transceivers. Opt Express, 2017, 25(12), 13340 doi: 10.1364/OE.25.013340[26] Zhang S J, Wang H, Zou X H, et al. Electrical probing test for characterizing wideband optical transceiving devices with self-reference and on-chip capability. J Lightwave Technol, 2018, 36(19), 4326 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2018.2822944[27] Zhang S J, Li W, Chen W, et al. Accurate calibration and measurement of optoelectronic devices. J Lightwave Technol, 2020 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2020.3010065[28] Ma Y X, Zhang Z Y, Zhang S J, et al. Self-calibrating microwave characterization of broadband Mach–Zehnder electro-optic modulator employing low-speed photonic down-conversion sampling and low-frequency detection. J Lightwave Technol, 2018, 37(11), 2668 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2018.2874965[29] Zhang S J, Zhang C, Wang H, et al. Calibration-free measurement of high-speed Mach-Zehnder modulator based on low-frequency detection. Opt Lett, 2016, 41(3), 460 doi: 10.1364/OL.41.000460 -
Proportional views