Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2013, Volume 34 > Issue 10 > 105009

SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS

A multi-channel fully differential programmable integrated circuit for neural recording application

Yun Gui1, Xu Zhang1, , Yuan Wang1, Ming Liu1, Weihua Pei1, Kai Liang2, Suibiao Huang2, Bin Li2 and Hongda Chen1

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Zhang Xu, zhangxu@semi.ac.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/10/105009

PDF

Abstract: A multi-channel, fully differential programmable chip for neural recording application is presented. The integrated circuit incorporates eight neural recording amplifiers with tunable bandwidth and gain, eight 4th-order Bessel switch capacitor filters, an 8-to-1 analog time-division multiplexer, a fully differential successive approximation register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC), and a serial peripheral interface for communication. The neural recording amplifier presents a programmable gain from 53 dB to 68 dB, a tunable low cut-off frequency from 0.1 Hz to 300 Hz, and 3.77 μVrms input-referred noise over a 5 kHz bandwidth. The SAR ADC digitizes signals at maximum sampling rate of 20 kS/s per channel and achieves an ENOB of 7.4. The integrated circuit is designed and fabricated in 0.18-μm CMOS mix-signal process. We successfully performed a multi-channel in-vivo recording experiment from a rat cortex using the neural recording chip.

Key words: neural recording systemmulti-channelpreamplifierprogrammable gain amplifierswitch capacitor filtertime-division multiplexerSAR ADCin vivo recording

With the development of microelectronics, biopotentials become the key part in investigating activities of organisms to neuroscientists and clinicians. Early in the 1950s, Mountcastle[1] and Hubel[2] began the research in single neuron recordings performed with extracellular metal microelectrodes. As research in neuroscience continued, more results demonstrated that single neuron recordings poorly explained activities in organisms, while multi-neuron activities provided the way to read activities of the organism. Multi-neuron recording not only provides a new way to investigate neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease and epilepsy, but also makes it possible to implement neural prosthetics in the future.

Great efforts have been made to develop the multi-channel neural recording system. Large-scale experimental equipment for neural recording constrained the recording channels. With the development of techniques in microelectrode electrode array fabrication[3-7] and the application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), the activities of a large number of neurons can be recorded at the same time. Furthermore, wireless telemetry links were used in the recording system[8, 9] to eliminate cable tethering and risks of infection. In addition, to solve the problem of transmission of a large amount of data brought by multi-channel wireless transmission, some research groups have included data compression[10] and spike sorting[11, 12] in their neural recording systems. All of these progressions provided the possibility of long-term full implantation in the future.

Challenges of designing the multi-channel neural recording systems are related to the characteristics of biopotentials. Most of the neural activities lie in a frequency range of 0.1 Hz to 5 kHz, and the amplitude range is 20 μV to 5 mV[13, 14]. Since neural signals have large ranges in amplitude and frequency, a neural signal recording system must be designed to take this into account. Further, the design of the neural recording system has to account for the electrode-electrolyte interface generating direct current (DC) offset and the high impendence of the electrode. All of these make it essential to design a neural amplifier with good performance. Moreover, the challenges lie in miniaturization, data transmission, noise, power consumption and biocompatibility for chronic implantation.

In this paper, an 8-channel programmable integrated circuit for neural recording is described. The implementation of this chip makes the features of recording channels, such as gain, cut-off frequency, and address, digitally programmable. The programmability of every channel offers users a flexible way to suit for recording different neural signals and different numbers of simultaneous recording.

The architecture of the proposed multi-channel analog front-end neural recording chip is shown in Fig. 1. It incorporates 8 fully differential recording channels, an analog time-division multiplexer (TDM), a SAR ADC, a serial peripheral interface (SPI) and digital control unit. Each recording channel consists of an alternating current-(AC-) coupled fully differential preamplifier with a tunable low cut-off frequency, a programmable gain amplifier (PGA) with eight gain settings to meet gain requirement of the neural recording chip, and a 4-order Bessel SC filter to suppress high frequency noise. The low cut-off frequency and high cut-off frequency can be adjusted by programming the preamplifier and SC filter separately.

Figure  1.  Architecture of the multi-channel neural recording chip.

The neural signals from each channel after amplification are fed to an 8-to-1 analog TDM. Controlled by the digital signals, the TDM allows all 8 amplification channels to share a 9-bit SAR ADC. The SAR ADC digitizes signals at the maximum sampling rate of 20 kS/s per channel. Communication to the chip is accomplished using an SPI. The clock and controlling words for preamplifier, PGA, TDM and the SAR ADC are generated from the digital control unit. Fully differential design throughout the chip could minimize noises efficiently from common-mode interference and digital circuits.

To record the neural signals which have a large range in frequency, an AC-coupled preamplifier with adjustable low cut-off frequency is proposed in this work. Meanwhile, the DC offset at the interface of electrode and electrolyte could be eliminated. The preamplifier is based on operational transconductance amplifier (OTA) and T-capacitor feedback network topology. This circuit was first described in Ref. [15]. The schematic of the preamplifier is demonstrated in Fig. 2(a). Figure 2(b) shows the schematic of OTA1, it employs a two-stage amplification structure with Miller compensation.

Figure  2.  (a) Schematic of the preamplifier. (b) Schematic of OTA1.

The midband gain of the preamplifier is determined by the T-capacitor network, which is

Apre=C1Ceq,

(1)

where

Ceq=C2C3C2+C3+C4.

(2)

The T-capacitor feedback network topology reduces the value of the input capacitance C1 to one tenth to achieve the same midband gain, compared to the traditional capacitor feedback amplifier, which was described in Ref. [16]. Moreover, it improves the input impedance and minimizes signal attenuation.

PMOS devices M1 and M2 are biased in the subthreshold region as a tunable pseudo resistor[17] in the feedback loop, as presented in Fig. 2(a). The transistors M1, M2, and the T-capacitor network forms the high-pass pole, which is

fHP=12πReqCeq,

(3)

where Req is the equivalent resistance of transistors M1 and M2, and it is dominated by voltage Vres. For every channel, Vres is produced from a 4-bit current digital-to-analog converter (DAC). DAC output change makes Req vary in the order of 109-1013 Ω and fHP vary from 0.1 Hz to about 300 Hz.

As the midband gain of the preamplifier is much larger than PGA in the design, the noise of each recording channel is dominated by the preamplifier and the noise generated by PGA could be ignored. %It is important to design a low-noise preamplifier. The noise of preamplifier is contributed to by thermal noise of equivalent resistance Req and noise of OTA1. The noise introduced by OTA1 consists of both flicker noise and thermal noise. Using pMOS device as the input transistors and increasing their gates area could decrease the flicker noise effectively. The thermal noise is primarily determined by the input transistors M3 and M4. Getting a high transconductance of input transistors is a common way to reduce the thermal noise of OTA1.

A PGA is designed as the second stage for amplification in each recording channel to adapt to the large dynamic range in amplitude of the neural signals. Figure 3(a) presents the schematic of the PGA. The topology of the proposed PGA is a fully differential OTA with a resistor feedback network. A typically two-stage amplifier structure with Miller compensation of OTA2 is shown in Fig. 3(b). Eight groups of switches and resistors with different values composed the resistor network. The gain of the PGA is given by

Figure  3.  (a) Schematic of the PGA. (b) Schematic of OTA2.

Apga=RsRi,

(4)

where Ri is one of the eight values (R1,R2,...,R8) chosen from the resistor network and has values in kΩ range. The switches in the resistor network are controlled by PGA2-PGA0 from SPI, which makes PGA provide different gain.

To reduce the noise and improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) before data convention, a 4th-order Basel SC filter was introduced in the design. The SC filter is based on SC integrator and realized through LC-ladder flow graph simulation methods. The schematic of the 4th-order SC filter is demonstrated in Fig. 4(a). Figure 4(b) presents the schematic of the SC integrator. The high cut-off frequency of SC filter could be changed by adjusting the switching frequency fclk.

Figure  4.  (a) Schematic of the 4th-order basel SC filter. (b) Schematic of the SC integrator.

With the implementation of the 4th-order SC filter, the neural recording channel has introduced the network with 6 low-pass poles and a high-pass pole, so that the recorded neural signals can be highly improved before digitalization.

In biomedical application, the SAR ADC is widely used according to its low-power and medium sampling rate. A rail-to-rail input fully differential SAR ADC is used here to digitize neural signals out of TDM.

In consideration of the SAR ADC's resolution, the analysis of noise is the main factor. The noise before quantization is introduced by preamplifier, PGA, SC filter, and it is determined by the preamplifier because of its high midband gain. Thus the noise performance is dominated by noise at the input interface. The total noise at the input interface includes the electrode thermal noise, the background thermal noise, and the noise of the preamplifier. For a 1 MΩ electrode in 5 kHz bandwidth operating at 300 K, the thermal noise is 9.1 μVrms according to thermal noise spectral density 4kTR, while the preamplifier has a limited input-referred noise around 5 μVrms in the design. The typical background thermal noise is about 5-10 μVrms[18]. Therefore, the total input noise is at least 20 μVrms.

The minimal neural signal after amplification could be recognized by the ADC, that is

Vi(min)Ach(min)>vQ,

(5)

where Vi(min) is the minimal effective neural signal, it is around 20 μVrms according to the total input noise analysis. Ach(min) is the minimal gain of the recording channel when PGA is set to have the minimal gain. In this design, Ach(min) has a value of 52 dB. vQ is the quantization noise of the ADC, which is

vQ=VLSB12=2Vref12×2N,

(6)

where Vref is the reference voltage of the ADC, and N is ADC's resolution. To satisfy this expression, N is at least 7 bits for Vref set to maximum value. In this design, the resolution of the ADC is set to be 9 bits.

The SAR ADC is based on fully differential dual capacitor arrays topology. The capacitor network served as the DAC, as illustrated in Fig. 5. Adopting split capacitor array described in Ref. [19], the scaling capacitor Cs is designed as 1615C, where C is the unit capacitor. The capacitor network's size is reduced to one-eighth compared to traditional binary-weighted capacitor network.

Figure  5.  Schematic of the capacitor network.

The SAR ADC works as follows: first, the capacitor network is discharged at the beginning of each sampling period. Then, the comparators are set to store the output-offset voltage during output-offset storage (OOS) phase. The schematic of the output-offset storage is shown in Fig. 6, the input and output of the 3-stage comparators are connected to Vcm during OOS phase, and Vcm is set to be the half of the reference voltages Vrefp and Vrefn, so that the offsets of the comparators are stored in the capacitors. In the next step, the ADC is in sampling phase. The bottom sides of the capacitors are connected to the input voltage Vinp (or Vinn). The sampled charge is stored by the capacitor arrays in this phase. After sampling, the ADC begins to convert. The switches of the capacitor arrays are controlled by the SAR logic module, and the charge stored in the sampling phase redistributed between the capacitors. In this phase, it takes 10 clock cycles to complete the comparison and serial output. In this design, The SAR ADC digitizes signals at a maximum rate of 20 kS/s for each channel.

Figure  6.  Schematic of the output-offset storage.

To communicate with other devices, the recording chip incorporates an SPI interface, which is commonly used in commercial devices. The SPI uses 3 signals to communicate: SCLK, SDI, and SDO. The controlling data are serials in from SDI to control the chip operation, and the conversion data are serials out by SDO.

The digital control unit is used to adjust the low cut-off frequency of the preamplifier, the gain of the PGA and the channel of the TDM through SPI. As presented in Fig. 7, the recording channels are programmed in frame N, and the digitalized recording results, which are composed of 3-bit data for TDM address and 9-bit data for ADC results, are transited to the host in frame N+1.

Figure  7.  Sequency diagram of the neural recording chip.

The chip was designed and fabricated in 0.18-μm N-well CMOS 1P6M mix-signal process. The area of the chip is measured to be 2.5 × 2.5 mm2 with pads. The micrograph and the package of the chip are presented in Fig. 8. The modules and the system are tested and the experiment results are illustrated in the following parts.

Figure  8.  Micrograph and package of the neural recording chip.

The frequency response of the preamplifier is presented in Fig. 9. It achieved a midband gain of 46.8 dB. The high pass frequency fHP is less than 1 Hz and 310 Hz respectively. Figure 10 demonstrates the measured input-referred noise spectral density curve for the preamplifier with fHP set less than 0.1 Hz. Integrating the input-referred noise spectral density curve from 1 Hz to 5 kHz except the 50 Hz point generates an input-referred noise of 3.77 μVrms.

Figure  9.  Frequency response of the preamplifier with different Vres.
Figure  10.  Input-referred noise spectra for fHP< 0.1 Hz.

The measured frequency response of PGA is illustrated in Fig. 11. The gain is measured to be 9 dB-24 dB with different setting of PGA0-PGA2.

Figure  11.  Frequency response of the PGA with different gains.

Figure 12 presents the frequency response of the SC filter with different clock frequency. The high cut-off frequency is measured to be 5.69 kHz, 8.3 kHz and 10 kHz when clock frequency is 1 MHz, 2 MHz and 4 MHz respectively.

Figure  12.  Frequency response of the SC filter with different fclk.

The output of channel 1 is selected with MUX2-MUX0 set to 001. The frequency response of channel 1 is shown in Fig. 13; the measured midband gain of channel 1 is 55 dB with PGA set to have a gain of 4. The low cut-off frequency is 0.85 Hz with Vres measured to be 0.64 V.

Figure  13.  Frequency response of recording channel 1.

For dynamic performance measurements, a full-scale 4.1479 kHz sinusoidal wave is applied to the SAR ADC. Getting 4096 sample points and applied to fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis gets the power spectral density curve, as shown in Fig. 14. The signal-to-noise and distortion ratio (SINAD) calculated from this curve is 40.16 dB, corresponding to an effective number of bits (ENOB) of 7.4 with the most significant bit (MSB) as the sign bit. The power consumption of the SAR ADC under a 1.8 V supply is 193 μW.

Figure  14.  Power spectral density with an input sinusoidal wave of 4.1479 kHz.

A customized 16-channel neural recording system is proposed in this work and used in the in-vivo test. The recording system is composed of a microelectrode and 16-channel neural recording printed circuit board (PCB). The microelectrode is manufactured on silicon and it is 6 mm long. The impedance of the 16 recording sites on the microelectrode are measured in phosphate buffer solution (PBS). Every recording site has impedance around 2 MΩ at 1 kHz. Figure 15 shows the micrograph and the package of the 2 × 8 microelectrode. The diameter of each recording point is 12 μm. Spaces between two recording points in the same tetrode group and different tetrode group are 50 μm and 200 μm respectively.

Figure  15.  The micrograph and the package of the 2 × 8 microelectrode array.

A commercial module with an onboard Xilinx field programmable gate array (FPGA) and a universal serial bus (USB) microcontroller is used to configure the neural recording chips and communicate with the PC. A graphic user interface (GUI) is developed with LabVIEW to interact with the neural recording system.

The in-vivo recording experiment was shown in Fig. 16. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing about 250 g were used for the recording experiment. After being anaesthetized with urethane (1.4 g/kg, 20% solution), the rats were immobilized in a standard stereotaxic frame. A stainless steel bone-screw was inserted into the skull. The electrode connector was grounded to the bone-screw using a surface insulated stainless steel wire. Microelectrode arrays were advanced by a hydraulic microdrive (FHC, Bowdoin, ME, USA) to different brain regions. Anesthesia level was monitored by breathing patterns and eye blink reflex during recording. Neural signals were sampled at 20 kS/s and the digitalized results were transmitted in real time to the PC. One second in-vivo recorded results of 8 different channels from the rat's cortex are shown in Fig. 17. The amplitude of the recorded spikes was up to 920 μV. The spike at 1.78 s in Fig. 17 demonstrates that all of the 8 recording channels had recorded this spike and it could originate from the same neuron group.

Figure  16.  Pictures for the in-vivo test.
Figure  17.  The in-vivo recorded results from a rat cortex.

Table 1 demonstrated the detailed experimental characteristics of the fully differential programmable neural recording chip and performance comparison with the previous design in Refs. [20-22]. The work in Ref. [21] demonstrated an analog front-end that didn't include the ADC module. The work in Ref. [22] implemented neural recording and stimulation. All of the features of recording channels could be programmed digitally compared to Refs. [20-22]. Furthermore, our work demonstrated a lower input-referred noise. The architecture of this chip is fully differential compared to Refs. [20, 21].

Table  1.  Experimental characteristics and comparison.
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

This paper has demonstrated an 8-channel fully differential programmable neural recording chip. The fully differential design all over the chip makes it efficient to reduce common-mode noise and the digital interference. The recording channels have tunable bandwidth and gain, which can be configured to suit recording of different biopotentials. The recording mode is flexible to choose any subset of the recording channels and different sampling rates. The customized 16-channel neural recording system has been successfully tested in the in-vivo experiments. In our future work, the neural recording chip will incorporate data compression function and wireless telemetry to transmit large amounts of streaming data wirelessly.



[1]
Mountcastle V B. Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. J Neurophysiol, 1957, 20(4):408 http://jn.physiology.org/content/20/4/408
[2]
Hubel D H, Wiesel T N. Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol, 1959, 148(3):574 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006308
[3]
Pei W, Zhu L, Wang S, et al. Multi-channel micro neural probe fabricated with SOI. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 52(5):1187 doi: 10.1007/s11431-008-0272-9?no-access=true
[4]
Zhao H, Pei W, Chen S, et al. A composite insulation structure for silicon-based planar neuroprobes. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55(9):2436 doi: 10.1007/s11431-012-4856-z
[5]
Rousche P J, Pellinen D S, Pivin D P, et al. Flexible polyimide-based intracortical electrode arrays with bioactive capability. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2001, 48(3):361 doi: 10.1109/10.914800
[6]
Li X, Pei W, Tang R, et al. Investigation of flexible electrodes modified by TiN, Pt black and IrOx. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54(9):2305 doi: 10.1007/s11431-011-4436-7
[7]
Aziz J, Abdelhalim K, Shulyzki R, et al. 256-channel neural recording and delta compression microsystem with 3D electrodes. IEEE J Solid-State Circ, 2009, 44(3):995 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2008.2010997
[8]
Harrison R R, Kier R J, Chestek C A, et al. Wireless neural recording with single low-power integrated circuit. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2009, 17(4):322 doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2023298
[9]
Sodagar A, Wise K D, Najafi K. A wireless implantable microsystem for multichannel neural recording. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech, 2009, 57(10):2565 doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2009.2029957
[10]
[11]
Horiuchi T, Swindell T, Sander D, et al. A low-power CMOS neural amplifier with amplitude measurements for spike sorting. Proc of IEEE Int Symp Circ Syst, 2004, 4:29 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1328932/
[12]
O'Driscoll S, Meng T H, Shenoy K V, et al. Neurons to silicon:implantable prosthesis processor. Proc of IEEE Int Solid-State Circuits Conf, 2006:2248 https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.ieee-art-000001696287
[13]
Harrison R R, Charles C. A low-power low-noise CMOS amplifier for neural recording applications. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2003, 38(6):958 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2003.811979
[14]
Chae M S, Liu W, Sivaprakasam M. Design optimization for integrated neural recording systems. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2008, 43(9):1931 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2008.2001877
[15]
Zhang X. Studies on application specific integrated circuits for neural interfaces. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree, Beijing:Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2010, 70
[16]
Zhang X, Pei W, Huang B, et al. A low-noise fully-differential CMOS preamplifier for neural recording applications. Sci China Inf Sci, 2012, 55(2):441 doi: 10.1007/s11432-011-4333-5
[17]
Olsson R Ⅲ, Buhl D, Sirota A, et al. Band-tunable and multiplexed integrated circuits for simultaneous recording and stimulation with microelectrode arrays. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2005, 52(7):1303 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2005.847540
[18]
Guillory K S, Normann R A, A 100-channel system for real time detection and storage of extracellular spike waveforms. J Neurosci Methods, 1999, 91(1):21 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016502709900076X?via%3Dihub
[19]
Culurciello E, Andreou A. An 8-bit, 1 mW successive approximation ADC in SOI CMOS. Proc of IEEE Int Symp Circ Syst, 2003, 1:301 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1205560/authors
[20]
Gosselin B, Ayoub A E, Roy J, et al. A mixed-signal multichip neural recording interface with bandwidth reduction. IEEE Trans Biomed Circ and Syst, 2009, 3(3):129 doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2009.2013718
[21]
Kmon P, Zoladz M, Grybos P, et al. Design and measurements of 64-channel ASIC for neural signal recording. Proc of 31st Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2009:528 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5333629/
[22]
Shahrokhi F, Abdelhalim K, Serletis D, et al. The 128-channel fully differential digital integrated neural recording and stimulation interface. IEEE Trans Biomed Circ and Syst, 2010, 4(3):149 doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2010.2041350
Fig. 1.  Architecture of the multi-channel neural recording chip.

Fig. 2.  (a) Schematic of the preamplifier. (b) Schematic of OTA1.

Fig. 3.  (a) Schematic of the PGA. (b) Schematic of OTA2.

Fig. 4.  (a) Schematic of the 4th-order basel SC filter. (b) Schematic of the SC integrator.

Fig. 5.  Schematic of the capacitor network.

Fig. 6.  Schematic of the output-offset storage.

Fig. 7.  Sequency diagram of the neural recording chip.

Fig. 8.  Micrograph and package of the neural recording chip.

Fig. 9.  Frequency response of the preamplifier with different Vres.

Fig. 10.  Input-referred noise spectra for fHP< 0.1 Hz.

Fig. 11.  Frequency response of the PGA with different gains.

Fig. 12.  Frequency response of the SC filter with different fclk.

Fig. 13.  Frequency response of recording channel 1.

Fig. 14.  Power spectral density with an input sinusoidal wave of 4.1479 kHz.

Fig. 15.  The micrograph and the package of the 2 × 8 microelectrode array.

Fig. 16.  Pictures for the in-vivo test.

Fig. 17.  The in-vivo recorded results from a rat cortex.

Table 1.   Experimental characteristics and comparison.

[1]
Mountcastle V B. Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. J Neurophysiol, 1957, 20(4):408 http://jn.physiology.org/content/20/4/408
[2]
Hubel D H, Wiesel T N. Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol, 1959, 148(3):574 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006308
[3]
Pei W, Zhu L, Wang S, et al. Multi-channel micro neural probe fabricated with SOI. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 52(5):1187 doi: 10.1007/s11431-008-0272-9?no-access=true
[4]
Zhao H, Pei W, Chen S, et al. A composite insulation structure for silicon-based planar neuroprobes. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55(9):2436 doi: 10.1007/s11431-012-4856-z
[5]
Rousche P J, Pellinen D S, Pivin D P, et al. Flexible polyimide-based intracortical electrode arrays with bioactive capability. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2001, 48(3):361 doi: 10.1109/10.914800
[6]
Li X, Pei W, Tang R, et al. Investigation of flexible electrodes modified by TiN, Pt black and IrOx. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54(9):2305 doi: 10.1007/s11431-011-4436-7
[7]
Aziz J, Abdelhalim K, Shulyzki R, et al. 256-channel neural recording and delta compression microsystem with 3D electrodes. IEEE J Solid-State Circ, 2009, 44(3):995 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2008.2010997
[8]
Harrison R R, Kier R J, Chestek C A, et al. Wireless neural recording with single low-power integrated circuit. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2009, 17(4):322 doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2023298
[9]
Sodagar A, Wise K D, Najafi K. A wireless implantable microsystem for multichannel neural recording. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech, 2009, 57(10):2565 doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2009.2029957
[10]
[11]
Horiuchi T, Swindell T, Sander D, et al. A low-power CMOS neural amplifier with amplitude measurements for spike sorting. Proc of IEEE Int Symp Circ Syst, 2004, 4:29 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1328932/
[12]
O'Driscoll S, Meng T H, Shenoy K V, et al. Neurons to silicon:implantable prosthesis processor. Proc of IEEE Int Solid-State Circuits Conf, 2006:2248 https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.ieee-art-000001696287
[13]
Harrison R R, Charles C. A low-power low-noise CMOS amplifier for neural recording applications. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2003, 38(6):958 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2003.811979
[14]
Chae M S, Liu W, Sivaprakasam M. Design optimization for integrated neural recording systems. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2008, 43(9):1931 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2008.2001877
[15]
Zhang X. Studies on application specific integrated circuits for neural interfaces. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree, Beijing:Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2010, 70
[16]
Zhang X, Pei W, Huang B, et al. A low-noise fully-differential CMOS preamplifier for neural recording applications. Sci China Inf Sci, 2012, 55(2):441 doi: 10.1007/s11432-011-4333-5
[17]
Olsson R Ⅲ, Buhl D, Sirota A, et al. Band-tunable and multiplexed integrated circuits for simultaneous recording and stimulation with microelectrode arrays. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2005, 52(7):1303 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2005.847540
[18]
Guillory K S, Normann R A, A 100-channel system for real time detection and storage of extracellular spike waveforms. J Neurosci Methods, 1999, 91(1):21 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016502709900076X?via%3Dihub
[19]
Culurciello E, Andreou A. An 8-bit, 1 mW successive approximation ADC in SOI CMOS. Proc of IEEE Int Symp Circ Syst, 2003, 1:301 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1205560/authors
[20]
Gosselin B, Ayoub A E, Roy J, et al. A mixed-signal multichip neural recording interface with bandwidth reduction. IEEE Trans Biomed Circ and Syst, 2009, 3(3):129 doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2009.2013718
[21]
Kmon P, Zoladz M, Grybos P, et al. Design and measurements of 64-channel ASIC for neural signal recording. Proc of 31st Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2009:528 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5333629/
[22]
Shahrokhi F, Abdelhalim K, Serletis D, et al. The 128-channel fully differential digital integrated neural recording and stimulation interface. IEEE Trans Biomed Circ and Syst, 2010, 4(3):149 doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2010.2041350
1

A 1.25 μW/ch TDM-based analog front-end using a charge-sharing multiplexer for bio-potential recording

Yifan Huang, Jing Wang, Lin Cheng

Journal of Semiconductors. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24120034

2

Multi-channel 28-GHz millimeter-wave signal generation on a silicon photonic chip with automated polarization control

Ruiyuan Cao, Yu He, Qingming Zhu, Jingchi Li, Shaohua An, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(5): 052301. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/5/052301

3

A new RF trench-gate multi-channel laterally-diffused MOSFET on InGaAs

M. Payal, Y. Singh

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(9): 094001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/9/094001

4

A multi-channel analog IC for in vitro neural recording

Feng Yuan, Zhigong Wang, Xiaoying Lü

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(2): 025007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/2/025007

5

A CMOS frontend chip for implantable neural recording with wide voltage supply range

Jialin Liu, Xu Zhang, Xiaohui Hu, Yatao Guo, Peng Li, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(10): 105003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/10/105003

6

Design of a low power 10 bit 300 ksps multi-channel SAR ADC for wireless sensor network applications

Hui Hong, Shiliang Li, Tao Zhou

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(4): 045009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/4/045009

7

A high speed direct digital frequency synthesizer based on multi-channel structure

Ling Yuan, Qiang Zhang, Yin Shi

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(6): 065006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/6/065006

8

A 3.8 GHz programmable gain amplifier with a 0.1 dB gain step

Nan Lin, Fei Fang, Zhiliang Hong, Hao Fang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(3): 035004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/3/035004

9

A 10 MHz ripple-based on-time controlled buck converter with dual ripple compensation

Danzhu Lü, Jiale Yu, Zhiliang Hong

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(2): 025005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/2/025005

10

A very low noise preamplifier for extremely low frequency magnetic antenna

Shimin Feng, Suihua Zhou, Zhiyi Chen

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(7): 075003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/7/075003

11

High performance power-configurable preamplifier in a high-density parallel optical receiver

Wang Xiaoxia, Wang Zhigong

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(1): 015004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/1/015004

12

A programmable gain amplifier with a DC offset calibration loop for a direct-conversion WLAN transceiver

Lei Qianqian, Lin Min, Chen Zhiming, Shi Yin

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(4): 045006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/4/045006

13

An 8-bit 100-MS/s pipelined ADC without dedicated sample-and-hold amplifier

Zhang Zhang, Yuan Yudan, Guo Yawei, Cheng Xu, Zeng Xiaoyang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(7): 075006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/7/075006

14

A novel reconfigurable variable gain amplifier for a multi-mode multi-band receiver

Zheng Jiajie, Mo Taishan, Ma Chengyan, Yin Ming

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(7): 075011. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/7/075011

15

Low-power switched-capacitor delta-sigma modulator for EEG recording applications

Chen Jin, Zhang Xu, Chen Hongda

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(7): 075009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/7/075009

16

A novel low-noise linear-in-dB intermediate frequency variable-gain amplifier for DRM/DAB tuners

Wang Keping, Wang Zhigong, Zhou Jianzheng, Lei Xuemei, Zhou Mingzhu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(3): 035002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/3/035002

17

80 Gb/s 2 : 1 multiplexer in 0.13-µm SiGe BiCMOS technology

Zhao Yan, Wang Zhigong, Li Wei

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(2): 025008. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/2/025008

18

A 10Gb/s GaAs PHEMT High Gain Preamplifier for Optical Receivers

Jiao Shilong, Yang Xianming, Zhao Liang, Li Hui, Chen Zhenlong, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(12): 1902-1911.

19

12Gb/s 0.25μm CMOS Low-Power 1∶4 Demultiplexer

Ding Jingfeng, Wang Zhigong, Zhu En, Zhang Li, Wang Gui, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(1): 19-23.

20

Simulation of a Monolithic Integrated CMOS Preamplifier for Neural Recordings

Sui Xiaohong, Liu Jinbin, Gu Ming, Pei Weihua, Chen Hongda, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(12): 2275-2280.

  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Yun Gui, Xu Zhang, Yuan Wang, Ming Liu, Weihua Pei, Kai Liang, Suibiao Huang, Bin Li, Hongda Chen. A multi-channel fully differential programmable integrated circuit for neural recording application[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(10): 105009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/10/105009
    Y Gui, X Zhang, Y Wang, M Liu, W H Pei, K Liang, S B Huang, B Li, H D Chen. A multi-channel fully differential programmable integrated circuit for neural recording application[J]. J. Semicond., 2013, 34(10): 105009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/10/105009.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 2724 Times PDF downloads: 17 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    History

    Received: 05 March 2013 Revised: 22 March 2013 Online: Published: 01 October 2013

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Yun Gui, Xu Zhang, Yuan Wang, Ming Liu, Weihua Pei, Kai Liang, Suibiao Huang, Bin Li, Hongda Chen. A multi-channel fully differential programmable integrated circuit for neural recording application[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(10): 105009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/10/105009 ****Y Gui, X Zhang, Y Wang, M Liu, W H Pei, K Liang, S B Huang, B Li, H D Chen. A multi-channel fully differential programmable integrated circuit for neural recording application[J]. J. Semicond., 2013, 34(10): 105009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/10/105009.
      Citation:
      Yun Gui, Xu Zhang, Yuan Wang, Ming Liu, Weihua Pei, Kai Liang, Suibiao Huang, Bin Li, Hongda Chen. A multi-channel fully differential programmable integrated circuit for neural recording application[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(10): 105009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/10/105009 ****
      Y Gui, X Zhang, Y Wang, M Liu, W H Pei, K Liang, S B Huang, B Li, H D Chen. A multi-channel fully differential programmable integrated circuit for neural recording application[J]. J. Semicond., 2013, 34(10): 105009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/10/105009.

      A multi-channel fully differential programmable integrated circuit for neural recording application

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/10/105009
      Funds:

      the National High Technology Research & Development Program of China 2012AA030608

      Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2011CB933203), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61076023, 61178051), and the National High Technology Research & Development Program of China (No. 2012AA030608)

      the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61076023

      the National Basic Research Program of China 2011CB933203

      the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61178051

      More Information
      • Corresponding author: Zhang Xu, zhangxu@semi.ac.cn
      • Received Date: 2013-03-05
      • Revised Date: 2013-03-22
      • Published Date: 2013-10-01

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return