1. Introduction
Since lithium-ion batteries have high energy density, high cell voltage, no memory effect, low self-discharge rate and long service life compared to their main rival, NiMH batteries[1], Li-ion batteries have already been applied as power sources for many 3C (computer, communication, and consumer electronics) products, especially in portable electronics devices[2]. Additionally, many countries are taking steps to cut their nations' greenhouse gas emissions. In particular, auto emission standards are getting stricter and will force vehicles to become more fuel efficient. Because of these demands, the electric vehicle (EV) and the hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) have attracted more and more attention for fuel economy and eco-friendliness from automakers, governments, and customers[3]. However, due to the fragility and sensitivity to voltage and current (for example an overcharge has a high risk of explosion and an overdischarge of the battery cell reduces the lifecycle of the battery cell[4-7]})$, lithium-ion batteries are not considered for wide applications[8]. So, the design and realization of a lithium-ion battery protection circuit with high reliability is a challenge and a difficult task for designers. Moreover, owing to the high demand for the length of time the battery is used, low consumption is another key factor for the protection circuit.
In order to realize the protection circuit, many methods have been proposed[9-13]. The methods all have their advantages in protecting batteries from harm. However, most of these methods have been complex to understand and realize. To improve the reliability and lower the power consumption, this paper focuses on new and simple architectures for the protection circuit. The voltage bandgap reference (VBG) and
2. The structure of the single lithium-ion battery protection circuit
A block diagram of the proposed single lithium-ion battery protection circuit is shown in Fig. 1. There are eight main blocks in the diagram: VBG,
3. Detailed description of the circuit
3.1
VBG and Vref circuit
A schematic diagram of the proposed VBG is shown in Fig. 2. The VBG is a bandgap reference circuit relative to
Owing to the two approximately equal input voltages of the differential amplifier, Equation (1) can be written as
VBE2=VBE3+I3R3, |
(1) |
where
VTln(I2/I3)=I3R3, |
(2) |
where
I3=VTR3lnn. |
(3) |
The output voltage
VVBG=VDD−[VBE2+I3R4+(I2+I3)R5]. |
(4) |
According to Eqs. (2) and (3), Equation (4) can be simplified as
VVBG=VDD−[VBE2+(R4+R5+nR5)R3VTlnn]. |
(5) |
In Eq. (5),
To convert
3.2 Current detection circuit
As shown in Fig. 4, the current detection circuit includes two parts: a comparator and a Schmitt trigger. The comparator consists of a differential amplifier with active current mirrors and a common source single-stage amplifier. It can quickly compare the signal
3.3 Voltage detection, overvoltage detection and undervoltage detection circuit
As shown in Fig. 5, the VD circuit adopts the structure of the resistive subdivision to set the size of the OV and UV. The parallel structure of the resistive subdivision enhances the stability of voltage detection and improves the accuracy of the voltage collected from the power source. OVD and UVD circuits are comparators consisting of a differential amplifier with active current mirrors and a common source single-stage amplifier. The comparators compare
3.4 Controller circuit
The controller circuit is the key part of the whole system. All the detected signals converge into this block, then this part outputs signals to control the whole circuit. There are seven main blocks in the diagram shown in Fig. 6: state detection (SD), SSC, OSC, divider, judgment of priorities (JOP), output control and prohibit charging and discharging (PCAD). SD receives and deals with the detected signal so that the work status of the battery can be obtained. JOP judges the priority of the signal from SD, then outputs the highest priority signal to the output control circuit. The output control circuit controls the charging signal CO and discharging signal DO to decide the battery's work state. The OSC and divider provide the clock signal for SD. In order to reduce power consumption, SSC makes OSC and the divider come into the idle state when the battery's voltage is under UV.
The SSC circuit is shown in Fig. 7.
Vmc=R18+RfR18R19R19+R20VDD−RfR18VM. |
(6) |
When
Vmc=VDD−VM, |
(7) |
then comparator COMP_2 compares
![]() |
It can be seen from Table 1 that EN is only 0 if
OSC provides the circuit clock. As shown in Fig. 8, the main structure of OSC is a ring oscillator. The clock cycle is decided by the charging and discharging times of the capacitors. The equation can be written as
T=UCI, |
(8) |
where U is the voltage difference on the capacity. C and I are the capacitance value and constant-current source respectively. So the clock cycle can be roughly written as
T=U1C1I1+U2C2I2+U3C3I3+U4C4I4, |
(9) |
because
T=4(VDD−VTH)C1I1. |
(10) |
It can be seen from Eq. (10) that the clock cycle of the circuit could be set up by changing the size of the capacities and the constant-current power.
4. Simulation and measurement of the proposed battery protection circuit
The proposed battery protection circuit has been implemented in a 0.5
First, the simulation characteristics of VBG are shown in Fig. 10. It can be seen from Fig. 10(a) that
Figure 11 shows the simulation result for
Second, the simulation characteristics of the current detection circuit are shown in Fig. 12. When
Third, the simulation outputs of the OVD and UVD circuits are shown in Fig. 13. It can be seen from Fig. 13(a) that the battery is prohibited from charging when the voltage is above 4.25 V. So the battery's highest voltage is 4.25 V. The battery recovers the ability to charge when the voltage is under 4.15 V. On the other hand, notice from Fig. 13(b) that the battery cannot be discharged to 0 V; it has a lowest voltage of \, 2.3 V. Therefore, the range of the battery's voltage is from 2.3 to 4.25 V. Figure 14 shows the simulation result for the OSC. The output frequency is 3.5 kHz.
Figure 15 shows the measured results for the battery protection circuit. Figure 15(a) shows the measured result for OV, and Figure 15(b) shows the measured result for UV. Both the measured results meet the reliability requirements. The disparity between them and the simulation results shown in Fig. 13 is mainly generated by the parasitical effects of the capacitors and the variation of the process and temperature. The protection criteria for triggering the protection schemes and the working conditions of the circuit are listed in Table 2.
![]() |
A performance comparison between the proposed lithium-ion battery protection circuit and other related lithium-ion battery protection circuits is listed in Table 3.
![]() |
5. Conclusion
A single lithium-ion battery protection circuit with high reliability and low power consumption is proposed in this paper. Some new circuit architectures are adopted to improve the reliability of the protection circuit. First,