Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2014, Volume 35 > Issue 8 > 083004

SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS

Investigation of charge loss characteristics of HfO2 annealed in N2 or O2 ambient

Yuqiong Chu, Zongliang Huo, Yulong Han, Guoxing Chen, Dong Zhang, Xinkai Li and Ming Liu

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Huo Zongliang, Email:huozongliang@ime.ac.cn; Liu Ming, Email:liuming@ime.ac.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/8/083004

PDF

Abstract: The retention characteristics of electrons and holes in hafnium oxide with post-deposition annealing in a N2 or O2 ambient were investigated by Kelvin probe force microscopy. The KFM results show that compared with the N2 PDA process, the O2 PDA process can lead to a significant retention improvement. Vertical charge leakage and lateral charge spreading both played an important role in the charge loss mechanisms. The retention improvement is attributed to the deeper trap energy. For electrons, the trap energy of the HOS structure annealed in a N2 or O2 ambient were determined to be about 0.44 and 0.49 eV, respectively. For holes, these are about 0.34 and 0.36 eV, respectively. Finally, the electrical characteristics of the memory devices are demonstrated from the experiment, which agreed with our characterization results. The qualitative and quantitative determination of the charge retention properties, the possible charge decay mechanism and trap energy reported in this work can be very useful for the characterization of hafnium charge storage devices.

Key words: KFMHfO2retention

A charge trap flash (CTF) memory is widely accepted as a candidate for the next generation nonvolatile memory devices due to its significant advantages such as localized charge storage and coupling-free structure[1, 2], which are particularly important for 3D applications. To achieve a large memory window under low program/erase (P/E) voltages on CTF memory devices, the typical silicon nitride trapping layer can be replaced by high-k materials such as HfO2 with small equivalent nitride thickness[3-7]. Although some work has been done for HfO2 material optimization[8], investigation of its reliability characteristics, such as the poor retention property, is still an important issue and becomes more important for future high-density applications. To improve the retention characteristics, it is founded that the post-deposition annealing (PDA) process is essential for the properties of HfO2[9]. However, the detailed retention degradation mechanism of HfO2 annealed in a different ambient has not yet been investigated[10]. To further understand the properties of the retention degradation mechanism as a guide for device performance optimization in CTF, it is of great importance to directly investigate the vertical and lateral charge loss characteristics for HfO2 annealed in a different ambient, and the properties of trap energy. However, conventional charge pumping and 1/f noise technology mainly focus on the Si/SiO2 interface properties, and cannot investigate the properties of the HfO2 trapping layer directly[11, 12]. Kelvin probe force microscopy (KFM) is a very powerful tool in investigating the retention characteristics by measuring contact potential difference (CPD) line profiles and calculating the charge density after charge injection[13]. Although the trapping properties and retention characteristics of electrons have been determined in some studies[9], only a limited number of reports have discussed the hole trapping properties in the HfO2 trapping layer. Furthermore, the trapping properties, retention characteristics, and trap energy have never been simultaneously determined on one set of samples using the same measurement method. Since variations in growth conditions, dielectric stack structures, and measurement techniques can result in a large variation of extracted charge trapping properties, a systematical study of all these trapping properties for both electrons and holes on one specific sample set using the same experimental method is highly desirable. In this work, we employ the technique of variable temperature KFM to study the trapping properties, retention characteristics, and trap energy (of both electrons and holes), in HfO2 annealed in a different ambient.

The structure of HfO2-oxide-silicon was fabricated on an 8-12 Ωcm p-type Si (100) substrate. After standard cleaning, a 4-nm SiO2 layer was thermally grown at 900 ℃ in dry O2 ambient. Then, a 10 nm HfO2 layer was subsequently deposited by atomic layer deposition at 150 ℃. Finally, all devices were treated by post-deposition annealing for 60 s in a N2 or O2 ambient at 1000 ℃. Data retention behavior was visualized by KFM technology, with Bruker's newest scanning probe microscopy system (Multimode 8). All samples before measurement had been prebaked at 105 ℃ for more than 120 min to desorb humidity.

Charge injection was done by scans (speed of 0.6 Hz and vertical electric field of 12 MV/cm) when the probe was under contact mode, where a 0.6-Hz scan speed guarantees injected charge saturation, as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). In the KFM mode, the cantilever measures and records the surface topography. Then, 2-D potential images of injected charges were visualized in the interleave scan of the KFM mode along the recorded topography, as illustrated in Fig. 1(b).

Figure  1.  Schematic sample structure and KFM analysis method (a) charge injection with contact mode and (b) contact potential differences (CPDs) measurement.

For MAHOS devices, based on the fabrication of the HfO2-oxide-silicon structure, a 15 nm Al2O3 was deposited on the HOS by ALD at 200 ℃ as a blocking layer, followed by post-deposition annealing for 60 s in a N2 or O2 ambient. Finally, 200 nm Al gate was deposited by an e-beam evaporator as a gate electrode to complete the MAHOS structure. The electrical measurements were performed by an Agilent B1500 semiconductor characterization system.

Based on the C-V measurements, the dielectric constants of the HfO2 samples are firstly extracted, of which there were 20. KFM tests were performed to explore the data retention characteristics and HfO2 samples annealed in different ambients. Figure 2 shows the measured contact potential difference (CPD) line profiles of a sample with a HfO2 trapping layer after charge injection. The line profiles are obtained by extracting a horizontal scan-line across the injection center in the 2-D potential image. The inset regions denote the trapped electrons, which present the evolution of the surface potential image at different elapsed times. The downward arrow in Fig. 2(b) describes that the CPD peak value decreases due to vertical decay and lateral spreading and the left arrow describes that the widening of CPD profiles only results from lateral spreading. We calculated the initial injected charge density from the CPD peak value, which is based on the assumption of two extreme charge distributions: charges are trapped in the trapping bulk (Ⅰ) or at the interface (Ⅱ)[14]. The two assumptions of the charge distribution have the same trend in a charge density calculation. For simplicity, we use distribution (Ⅱ) as our calculation method. Meanwhile, compared to the N2 PDA sample, a larger CPD peak value, larger charge injection and less decay are observed for the O2 PDA sample in Fig. 2(c).

Figure  2.  The measured CPDs profiles after injection of electrons and holes of samples annealed in (a) N2 and (b) O2 ambient (c) injected electron and hole density in 0 s and after 7560 s.

Under the same estimating strategy, charge retention characteristics are extracted from different samples with a normalized electron and hole density as shown in Fig. 3. The overall charge decay of the N2-PDA HfO2 trapping layer is larger than O2-PDA ones. The overall charge decay of holes is larger than the electrons.

Figure  3.  Normalized electron and hole densities (σT /σT0) evolution versus the elapsed time corresponding to samples annealed in a N2 and O2 ambient, which present the overall performance of retention. }

Considering that the retention property has a strong relation with the vertical decay and lateral diffusion as illustrated in Fig. 2(b), we integrate charge densities from the extracted CPDs to obtain the remaining proportion after 7560 s, which remain at 0.9216, 0.8889, 0.7948, and 0.7491, corresponding to the electron density of the samples annealed in an O2 or N2 ambient, and the hole density of the samples annealed in an O2 or N2 ambient, respectively. We can conclude that the O2 PDA condition is effective in reducing the total charge loss.

To further understand the charge loss characteristics in HfO2, the lateral charge spreading is another concern to be evaluated. As illustrated in Fig. 4, the electron density profile can be fitted by a Gaussian distribution. Selected potential line profiles are fitted by the following equation to qualify the diffusion coefficient[15].

p=U2πDp(t+t0)exp[x24Dp(t+t0)],
(1)
Figure  4.  Charge density line profiles (dot lines) and their fitted curve using Eq. (1) (thin lines) of devices annealed in N2 ambient.

where p, U, Dp, t and x are the charge density, the constant related to the initial charge density, the diffusion coefficient, elapsed time, and lateral dimension, respectively. The fitting results are illustrated in Table 1.

Table  1.  Extracted diffusion coefficients for different samples.
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

The results show that the lateral diffusion of HfO2 material annealed in O2 ambient is smaller than the N2-PDA ones. The lateral diffusion coefficient of holes is larger than electrons as well. The lateral charge spreading characteristics evaluated by the diffusion coefficient are in good agreement with the aforementioned total charge loss properties.

To determine the effective trap energies of charges trapped in the HfO2 trapping layer, we studied their retention behavior at elevated temperatures. We assume that the thermal emission, which is the thermal excitation of trapped electrons (holes) from the trap centers in HfO2 to the conduction (valence) band, followed by the oxide tunneling process, is the main decay process.

Firstly, using the calculated charge trap density in each sample, we can obtain the retention times τ at different temperatures, then trap energy Et can also be determined from the linear relationship between log(τT2) and 1/T.

log(τT2)=log(aebb)+Et2.3kB1T.
(2)

Figure 5(a) shows the CPD decay profiles of the sample with a N2-PDA HfO2 trapping layer at 25 ℃; the 90 ℃ results show that CPD decay becomes more severe at high temperatures. Figure 5(b) shows the retention behavior at high temperatures, and we extracted the effective retention time τ from the slope, which is closely related to the thermal emission and band-to-band tunneling. Using τ values at different T, we obtain the effective trap energies by linear fitting as illustrated in Fig. 5(c) when we employ the Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) model. The results are illustrated in Table 2.

Table  2.  Extracted trap energy levels for different samples. Unit: eV
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

Considering all the above, it is concluded that, compared to N2-PDA, the O2-PDA HfO2 trapping layer shows the better retention characteristics in both the vertical and lateral directions. Vertical charge leakage and lateral charge spreading both play important roles in the charge loss mechanisms. The retention improvement is attributed to the deeper effective trap energies.

Finally, memory devices annealed at different ambients are fabricated and measured[16]. Figure 6 presents the high-frequency (100 kHz) C-V hysteresis of the two samples under ±15 V sweep voltage to observe the memory effect. The results show that the device annealed in the O2 ambient has a larger memory window. The memory effect of the MAHOS structure originates from the intrinsic HfO2 traps and the trap sites at the interface. Larger memory windows indicate that the PDA processes have an impact on the trap density of the AHOS structure, which agrees with the KFM result in Fig. 2(c).

Figure  5.  (a) CPD decay profiles of the sample with HfO2 trapping layer at 90 ℃ and 25 ℃. (b) ln(σI)-t plots, which are converted from CPD peak values by assuming charges are distributed at the interface, where ET is the effective trap energy. (c) Relationship between τT2 (unit: sK2) and 1/T (unit: K1), where α is the combination of temperature independent constants, and ebb is the direct tunneling of electrons through the oxide from HfO2 conduction band into the silicon conduction band.

Data retention properties with an identical initial flat-band voltage are shown in Fig. 7. We can see that the retention characteristics of the O2 PDA device at 25 ℃, 85 ℃ is better than the device annealed in the N2 ambient. Comparing these results with Fig. 3, the results are in good agreement.

Figure  6.  The high-frequency (100 kHz) C-V hysteresis of the two samples under ±15 V sweep voltage.

With Al2O3 as the blocking oxide layer, the gate leakage current properties at 25 ℃ and 85 ℃ of samples annealed in N2 and O2 ambients are shown in Fig. 8. It is shown that the gate leakage current of the O2 PDA device is smaller than the device annealed in the N2 ambient at 25 ℃, 85 ℃. Comparing these results with Fig. 7, we can know that the post-deposition anneal in the O2 ambient improved the retention characteristics in MAHOS memory devices by reducing the leakage current and then improving the retention characteristics.

Figure  7.  Data retention properties at 25 ℃ and 85 ℃ with an identical initial Vfb of samples annealed in N2 and O2 ambients.
Figure  8.  Gate leakage current properties at data retention properties at 25 ℃ and 85 ℃ of samples annealed in N2 and O2 ambients.

In summary, the HfO2 material annealed in O2-PDA shows a larger injected charge density, and a better retention characteristic in both the vertical and lateral directions than N2-PDA ones. Vertical charge leakage and lateral charge spreading both play important roles in the charge loss mechanisms. The retention improvement is attributed to the deeper effective trap energies. Finally, the electrical characteristics of memory devices are demonstrated from the experiment, which agreed with our characterization results.



[1]
Kim K. From the future Si technology perspective:challenges and opportunities. Electron Devices Meeting, 2010, 1(1):1 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/icp.jsp?arnumber=5703274
[2]
Wang Y Q, Hwang W S, Zhang G, et al. Electrical characteristics of memory devices with a high-k HfO2 trapping layer and dual SiO2/Si3N4 tunneling layer. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2007, 54(10):2700 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4317755/
[3]
You H W, Cho W J. Charge trapping properties of the HfO2 layer with various thicknesses for charge trap flash memory applications. Appl Phys Lett, 2010, 96(9):093506 doi: 10.1063/1.3337103
[4]
Yuan C L, Chan M Y, Lee P S, et al. Al2O3 nanocrystals embedded in amorphous Lu2O3 high-k gate dielectric for floating gate memory application. J Phys:Conference Series, 2007, 61(1):1312 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007JPhCS..61.1312Y
[5]
Ding S J, Zhang D W, Wang L K. Atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3-HfO2 laminated and sandwiched dielectrics for metal-insulator-metal capacitors. J Phys D:Appl Phys, 2007, 40(4):1072 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/40/4/023
[6]
Maikap S, Rahaman S Z, Tien T C, et al. Nanoscale (EOT = 5.6 nm) nonvolatile memory characteristics using n-Si/SiO2/HfAlO nanocrystal/Al2O3/Pt capacitors. Nanotechnology, 2008, 19(43):435202 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/43/435202
[7]
Sugizaki T, Kohayashi M, Ishidao M, et al. Novel multi-bit SONOS type flash memory using a high-k charge trapping layer. Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2003:27 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/icp.jsp?arnumber=1221069
[8]
Spiga S, Driussi F, Lamperti A. Experimental and simulation study of the program efficiency of HfO2 based charge trapping memories. Solid-State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC), 2010:408 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5618194/
[9]
Zhu Chenxin, Yang Rong, Huo Zongliang, et al. Investigation of charge trap and loss characteristics for charge trap memory by electrostatic force microscopy. Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium (NVMTS), 2011:1 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6137099/
[10]
Chowdhury N A, Garg R, Misra D, et al. Charge trapping and interface characteristics of thermally evaporated HfO2. Appl Phys Lett, 2004, 85(15):3290 doi: 10.1063/1.1805708
[11]
Ryan J T, Yu L C, Han J H, et al. A new interface defect spectroscopy method. IRPS, 2011:203 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5872242/
[12]
Uren M J. The properties of individual Si/SiO2 defects and their link to 1/f noise. Mater Sci Forum, 1992, 83-87:1519 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.83-87
[13]
Girard P. Electrostatic force microscopy:principles and some applications to semiconductors. Nanotechnology, 2001, 12(4):485 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/12/4/321
[14]
Tzeng S D, Gwo S. Charge trapping properties at silicon nitride/silicon oxide interface studied by variable-temperature electrostatic force microscopy. J Appl Phys, 2006, 100(2):023711 doi: 10.1063/1.2218025
[15]
Baik S J, Lim K S. Lateral redistribution of trapped charges in nitride/oxide/Si (NOS) investigated by electrostatic force microscopy. Nanoscale, 2011, 3:2560 doi: 10.1039/c1nr10104h
[16]
Chen Yong, Zhao Jianming, Han Dedong, et al. Extraction of equivalent oxide thickness for HfO2 high k gate dielectrics. Chinese Journal of Semiconductors, 2006, 27(5):852
Fig. 1.  Schematic sample structure and KFM analysis method (a) charge injection with contact mode and (b) contact potential differences (CPDs) measurement.

Fig. 2.  The measured CPDs profiles after injection of electrons and holes of samples annealed in (a) N2 and (b) O2 ambient (c) injected electron and hole density in 0 s and after 7560 s.

Fig. 3.  Normalized electron and hole densities (σT /σT0) evolution versus the elapsed time corresponding to samples annealed in a N2 and O2 ambient, which present the overall performance of retention. }

Fig. 4.  Charge density line profiles (dot lines) and their fitted curve using Eq. (1) (thin lines) of devices annealed in N2 ambient.

Fig. 5.  (a) CPD decay profiles of the sample with HfO2 trapping layer at 90 ℃ and 25 ℃. (b) ln(σI)-t plots, which are converted from CPD peak values by assuming charges are distributed at the interface, where ET is the effective trap energy. (c) Relationship between τT2 (unit: sK2) and 1/T (unit: K1), where α is the combination of temperature independent constants, and ebb is the direct tunneling of electrons through the oxide from HfO2 conduction band into the silicon conduction band.

Fig. 6.  The high-frequency (100 kHz) C-V hysteresis of the two samples under ±15 V sweep voltage.

Fig. 7.  Data retention properties at 25 ℃ and 85 ℃ with an identical initial Vfb of samples annealed in N2 and O2 ambients.

Fig. 8.  Gate leakage current properties at data retention properties at 25 ℃ and 85 ℃ of samples annealed in N2 and O2 ambients.

Table 1.   Extracted diffusion coefficients for different samples.

Table 2.   Extracted trap energy levels for different samples. Unit: eV

[1]
Kim K. From the future Si technology perspective:challenges and opportunities. Electron Devices Meeting, 2010, 1(1):1 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/icp.jsp?arnumber=5703274
[2]
Wang Y Q, Hwang W S, Zhang G, et al. Electrical characteristics of memory devices with a high-k HfO2 trapping layer and dual SiO2/Si3N4 tunneling layer. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2007, 54(10):2700 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4317755/
[3]
You H W, Cho W J. Charge trapping properties of the HfO2 layer with various thicknesses for charge trap flash memory applications. Appl Phys Lett, 2010, 96(9):093506 doi: 10.1063/1.3337103
[4]
Yuan C L, Chan M Y, Lee P S, et al. Al2O3 nanocrystals embedded in amorphous Lu2O3 high-k gate dielectric for floating gate memory application. J Phys:Conference Series, 2007, 61(1):1312 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007JPhCS..61.1312Y
[5]
Ding S J, Zhang D W, Wang L K. Atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3-HfO2 laminated and sandwiched dielectrics for metal-insulator-metal capacitors. J Phys D:Appl Phys, 2007, 40(4):1072 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/40/4/023
[6]
Maikap S, Rahaman S Z, Tien T C, et al. Nanoscale (EOT = 5.6 nm) nonvolatile memory characteristics using n-Si/SiO2/HfAlO nanocrystal/Al2O3/Pt capacitors. Nanotechnology, 2008, 19(43):435202 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/43/435202
[7]
Sugizaki T, Kohayashi M, Ishidao M, et al. Novel multi-bit SONOS type flash memory using a high-k charge trapping layer. Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2003:27 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/icp.jsp?arnumber=1221069
[8]
Spiga S, Driussi F, Lamperti A. Experimental and simulation study of the program efficiency of HfO2 based charge trapping memories. Solid-State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC), 2010:408 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5618194/
[9]
Zhu Chenxin, Yang Rong, Huo Zongliang, et al. Investigation of charge trap and loss characteristics for charge trap memory by electrostatic force microscopy. Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium (NVMTS), 2011:1 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6137099/
[10]
Chowdhury N A, Garg R, Misra D, et al. Charge trapping and interface characteristics of thermally evaporated HfO2. Appl Phys Lett, 2004, 85(15):3290 doi: 10.1063/1.1805708
[11]
Ryan J T, Yu L C, Han J H, et al. A new interface defect spectroscopy method. IRPS, 2011:203 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5872242/
[12]
Uren M J. The properties of individual Si/SiO2 defects and their link to 1/f noise. Mater Sci Forum, 1992, 83-87:1519 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.83-87
[13]
Girard P. Electrostatic force microscopy:principles and some applications to semiconductors. Nanotechnology, 2001, 12(4):485 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/12/4/321
[14]
Tzeng S D, Gwo S. Charge trapping properties at silicon nitride/silicon oxide interface studied by variable-temperature electrostatic force microscopy. J Appl Phys, 2006, 100(2):023711 doi: 10.1063/1.2218025
[15]
Baik S J, Lim K S. Lateral redistribution of trapped charges in nitride/oxide/Si (NOS) investigated by electrostatic force microscopy. Nanoscale, 2011, 3:2560 doi: 10.1039/c1nr10104h
[16]
Chen Yong, Zhao Jianming, Han Dedong, et al. Extraction of equivalent oxide thickness for HfO2 high k gate dielectrics. Chinese Journal of Semiconductors, 2006, 27(5):852
1

High-performance enhancement-mode GaN-based p-FETs fabricated with O3-Al2O3/HfO2-stacked gate dielectric

Hao Jin, Sen Huang, Qimeng Jiang, Yingjie Wang, Jie Fan, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(10): 102801. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/10/102801

2

Improving the data retention of phase change memory by using a doping element in selected Ge2Sb2Te5

Yaoyao Lu, Daolin Cai, Yifeng Chen, Shuai Yan, Lei Wu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(4): 042402. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/4/042402

3

Ferroelectricity-modulated resistive switching in Pt/Si:HfO2/HfO2-x/Pt memory

Ran Jiang, Xianghao Du, Zuyin Han

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(8): 084006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/8/084006

4

Metal-to-metal antifuse with low programming voltage and low on-state resistance

Yang Jiang, Min Tian, Huang Long, Jie Zhao, Shuai Chen, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(7): 074008. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/7/074008

5

BE-SONOS flash memory along with metal gate and high-k dielectrics in tunnel barrier and its impact on charge retention dynamics

Sonal Jain, Deepika Gupta, Vaibhav Neema, Santosh Vishwakarma

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(3): 034002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/3/034002

6

Characteristics of HfO2/Hf-based bipolar resistive memories

Jinshun Bi, Zhengsheng Han

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(6): 064010. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/6/064010

7

Metal dopants in HfO2-based RRAM:first principle study

Yuanyang Zhao, Jiayu Wang, Jianbin Xu, Fei Yang, Qi Liu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(4): 042002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/4/042002

8

TDDB characteristic and breakdown mechanism of ultra-thin SiO2/HfO2 bilayer gate dielectrics

Fenfen Tao, Hong Yang, Bo Tang, Zhaoyun Tang, Yefeng Xu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(6): 064003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/6/064003

9

Optimal migration route of Cu in HfO2

Jinlong Lu, Jing Luo, Hongpeng Zhao, Jin Yang, Xianwei Jiang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(1): 013001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/1/013001

10

The conductive path in HfO2: first principles study

Zhou Maoxiu, Zhao Qiang, Zhang Wei, Liu Qi, Dai Yuehua, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(7): 072002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/7/072002

11

Resistive switching characteristics of Ni/HfO2/Pt ReRAM

Zhang Xiao

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(5): 054011. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/5/054011

12

Comparison of electron transmittances and tunneling currents in an anisotropic TiNx/HfO2/SiO2/p-Si(100) metal–oxide–semiconductor (MOS) capacitor calculated using exponential- and Airy-wavefunction app

Fatimah A. Noor, Mikrajuddin Abdullah, Sukirno, Khairurrijal

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(12): 124002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/12/124002

13

Effect of annealing on characteristics of a HfOxNy–HfO2–HfOxNy sandwich stack compared with HfO2 film

Zhang Yan, Jiang Ran

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 082004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/082004

14

Observation of ferromagnetism in highly oxygen-deficient HfO2 films

Jiang Ran, Zhang Yan

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(10): 102002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/10/102002

15

GaN MOS-HEMT Using Ultrathin Al2O3 Dielectric with fmax of 30.8GHz

Hao Yue, Yue Yuanzheng, Feng Qian, Zhang Jincheng, Ma Xiaohua, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(11): 1674-1678.

16

Photoluminescence Properties of Er-Doped HfO2 Films

Xia Yan, Wang Junzhuan, Shi Zhuoqiong, Shi Yi, Pu Lin, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(9): 1388-1391.

17

Data Retention in EEPROM Cells

Cheng Wei, Hao Yue, Ma Xiaohua, Liu Hongxia

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(7): 1290-1293.

18

AFM and XPS Study on the Surface and Interface States of CuPc and SiO2 Films

Chen Jinhuo, Wang Yongshun, Zhu Haihua, Hu Jiaxing, Zhang Fujia, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(8): 1360-1366.

19

Extraction of Equivalent Oxide Thickness for HfO2 High k Gate Dielectrics

Chen Yong, Zhao Jianming, Han Dedong, Kang Jinfeng, Han Ruqi, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(5): 852-856.

20

基于MBE的fmax为157GHz的SiGe HBT器件

刘道广, 郝跃, 徐世六, 李开成, 刘玉奎, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(3): 528-531.

  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Yuqiong Chu, Zongliang Huo, Yulong Han, Guoxing Chen, Dong Zhang, Xinkai Li, Ming Liu. Investigation of charge loss characteristics of HfO2 annealed in N2 or O2 ambient[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(8): 083004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/8/083004
    Y Q Chu, Z L Huo, Y L Han, G X Chen, D Zhang, X K Li, M Liu. Investigation of charge loss characteristics of HfO2 annealed in N2 or O2 ambient[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(8): 083004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/8/083004.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 2360 Times PDF downloads: 13 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    History

    Received: 10 January 2014 Revised: 10 March 2014 Online: Published: 01 August 2014

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Yuqiong Chu, Zongliang Huo, Yulong Han, Guoxing Chen, Dong Zhang, Xinkai Li, Ming Liu. Investigation of charge loss characteristics of HfO2 annealed in N2 or O2 ambient[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(8): 083004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/8/083004 ****Y Q Chu, Z L Huo, Y L Han, G X Chen, D Zhang, X K Li, M Liu. Investigation of charge loss characteristics of HfO2 annealed in N2 or O2 ambient[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(8): 083004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/8/083004.
      Citation:
      Yuqiong Chu, Zongliang Huo, Yulong Han, Guoxing Chen, Dong Zhang, Xinkai Li, Ming Liu. Investigation of charge loss characteristics of HfO2 annealed in N2 or O2 ambient[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(8): 083004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/8/083004 ****
      Y Q Chu, Z L Huo, Y L Han, G X Chen, D Zhang, X K Li, M Liu. Investigation of charge loss characteristics of HfO2 annealed in N2 or O2 ambient[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(8): 083004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/8/083004.

      Investigation of charge loss characteristics of HfO2 annealed in N2 or O2 ambient

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/8/083004
      Funds:

      the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61176073

      the MOST 2011CBA00600

      the MOST 2010CB934200

      Project supported by the MOST (Nos. 2010CB934200, 2011CBA00600) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61176073)

      More Information

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return