J. Semicond. > 2016, Volume 37 > Issue 6 > 064012

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES

Low-frequency noise characteristics in the MOSFETs processed in 65 nm technology

Yuan Liu1, , Yurong Liu2, Yujuan He1, Bin Li2, Yunfei En1 and Wenxiao Fang1

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Yuan Liu, liuyuan@ceprei.com

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064012

PDF

Abstract: Low-frequency noise behavior in the MOSFETs processed in 65 nm technology is investigated in this paper. Low-frequency noise for NMOS transistors agrees with McWhorter's theory (carrier number fluctuation), low-frequency noise in the sub-threshold regime agrees with McWhorter's theory for PMOS transistors while it agree with Hooge's theory (carrier mobility fluctuation) in the channel strong inversion regime. According to carrier number fluctuation model, the extracted trap densities near the interface between channel and gate oxide for NMOS and PMOS transistor are 3.94×1017 and 3.56×1018 cm-3/eV respectively. According to carrier mobility fluctuation model, the extracted average Hooge's parameters are 2.42×10-5 and 4×10-4. By consideration of BSIM compact model, it is shown that two noise parameters (NOIA and NOIB) can model the intrinsic channel noise. The extracted NOIA and NOIB are constants for PMOS and their values are equal to 3.94×1017 cm-3/eV and 9.31×10-4 V-1. But for NMOS, NOIA is also a constant while NOIB is inversely proportional to the effective gate voltage. The extracted NOIA and NOIB for NMOS are equal to 3.56×1018 cm-3/eV and 1.53×10-2 V-1. Good agreement between simulation and experimental results is achieved.

Key words: MOSFETlow-frequency noisecarrier number fluctuationcarrier mobility fluctuation

With the improvement of CMOS manufacture technologies,the average feature size and the supply voltage in the integrated circuits are downscaled while the working frequency is increased. The effect of low-frequency noise (1f noise) in the semiconductor devices becomes more important,especially in analog applications. These low-frequency noises may be up-converted to high frequencies which is a dominant contributor to phase noise,thus adversely affecting the operation of MOSFETs in wireless LAN and RF applications[1, 2]. Further investigations on accurate modeling and parameter extraction of low-frequency noise for the CMOS transistor in nanometer technology node are essential for analog circuit design simulations.

In addition,low-frequency noise can be utilized in the estimation of device reliability and the diagnosis of defects and failures[3, 4]. Built on the measurement of low-frequency noise,the concentration and distribution of interface state,border traps and oxide trapped charges can be extracted and analyzed. Therefore,dependence of manufacturing processes on the intrinsic electrical characteristics of semiconductor devices can be predicted while the degradation under external stresses also can be characterized. As a non-destructive estimation method,the measurement of low-frequency noise is widely used in the prediction of device reliability and failure,especially in bipolar transistors,MOSFETs,GaN HEMT,thin film transistors and semiconductor laser[5-7].

Several models were proposed to describe noise behavior in MOSFETs[1, 8-10]. Generally,there are two major existing theories to explain the origins of the low-frequency noise: McWhorter's and Hooge's model. For McWhorter's model,low-frequency noise is caused by carrier number fluctuations due to surface state effect which considers that the low-frequency noise is attributed to the random trapping and de-trapping processes of charges in the oxide traps near the Si-SiO2 interface. For Hooge's experimental model,low-frequency noise is caused by bulk carrier mobility fluctuation which is induced by fluctuations in the phonon population through phonon scattering. By combining both number and correlated surface mobility fluctuation mechanisms,Hung KK proposed a unified model used in BSIM3[11, 12]. By use of three fitting parameters (NOIA,NOIB and NOIC),the analytical description provides low-frequency noise simulation from weak to strong inversion in the larger MOSFETs. Thereby,it still has some room to investigate the low-frequency noise in the MOSFETs processed in nanometer technology node.

In this paper,low-frequency noises in the n-channel and p-channel MOSFETs processed in 65 nm technology are investigated. The variation of current noise power spectral density versus external voltage is analyzed,thus the density of defects near Si-SiO2 interface and average Hooge's parameter are extracted. Based on BSIM model,two fitting parameters (NOIA and NOIB) are extracted and then used for the simulation of low-frequency noise characteristics in the nanometer MOSFETs.

In order to measure the MOSFETs drain current noise power spectrum densities (PSD) under different bias conditions,the experimental setup is illustrated in Figure 1. The device under test (DUT) is voltage biased,and its current noises are analyzed by using an SR785 dynamic signal analyzer. The core of this system is the filter and amplifier unit which is also called a 9812B noise analyzer made by Proplus Design Solution,Inc. The unit contains a high-quality RC low-pass filter for removing the source-measure unit noise from B1500. Thus,the DUT bias voltages are very closed to the pure DC signals and free from noise.

Figure  1.  The measurement setup for low-frequency noise in the MOSFETs.

The devices used in this experiment were n-channel and p-channel MOSFETs which were processed in a standard SMIC 65 nm complementary-MOS technology for low-leakage logic applications. This technology offers a dual-gate oxide process for input/output devices and a standard-gate oxide for typical MOSFETs. A leading edge 193 nm lithography process used on critical levels enables aggressive 0.7 × scaling while the direct design migrated from the previous technology node with design rule restriction. In addition,this technology utilizes an advanced low k BEOL integration of eight levels with copper for both wirebond and flip chip package offerings. In this paper,the gate oxide thickness (tox) in the DUT is about 1.2 nm. The channel length is 65 nm while the W/L ratio is 100. The nominal operating voltage is 1.2 V. The calculated gate oxide capacitance per unit area (Cox) is about 2.88 ×10-6 F/cm2.

The transfer characteristics of NMOS and PMOS are shown in Figures 2 and 3. Based on the measurement results,the extracted threshold voltages in the NMOS and PMOS are about 0.46 and -0.52 V,respectively.

Figure  2.  Transfer characteristics in the n-channel MOSFET.
Figure  3.  Transfer characteristics in the p-channel MOSFET.

The sub-threshold current can be expressed by[13, 14]:

Ids=ID0expq(VgsVth)ηKT[1exp(qVdsKT)],

(1)

where Vgs is the gate-source voltage,Vds is the drain-source voltage,ID0 is the channel current when Vgs is equal to Vth,ηis:

η=Cox+Cd+CitCox,

(2)

where Cox,Cd and Cit are gate oxide capacitance,depletion capacitance and interface trap capacitance per unit area,respectively.

The sub-threshold swing (S) can be expressed by:

S=dVgsdlgIds.

(3)

By use of,Equation (3),the extracted sub-threshold swing in the NMOS and PMOS are about 89.04 mV/dec and 95.14 mV/dec,respectively. Based on Equations (1) and (3),the relationship between η and S can be expressed by:

S2.3Vt(Cox+Cd+CitCox)=2.3Vtη.

(4)

By use of Equation (4),the extracted η in the NMOS and PMOS are about 1.48 and 1.59,respectively. Thus,the value of Cox+Cd+Cit in the NMOS and PMOS can be calculated while it is about 4.26×10-6 F/cm2 and 4.58×10-6 F/cm2,respectively.

In the deep linear region,the channel current can be expressed by[13, 14]:

Ids,lin=μeffCoxW/L(VgsVth)Vds1+[θ+gm(Rs+Rd)](VgsVth).

(5)

By ignoring the parasitical resistance in the source and drain,the extracted effective electron mobility (ueff) is about 60.62 cm2/(V • s) in the NMOS when Vgs is equal to 1 V and Vds is equal to 0.1 V,while the extracted effective hole mobility (ueff) is about 24.35 cm2/(V•s) in the PMOS when V gs is equal to -1 V and Vds is equal to -0.1 V. Low effective mobility extracted is due to carrier scattering effects in the interface near the gate oxide[14]. When the vertical field exceeds the critical value which is about 5.5 × 105 V/cm,the effective mobility in the devices processed in 65 nm technology node decrease significantly with increasing effective gate voltage.

Low-frequency noise characteristics for NMOS and PMOS were measured in the frequency range of 1 Hz to 100 kHz. For impedance matching between DUT and internal low noise amplifiers during measurement,the R G in Figure 1 is setting to short (0Ω) due to the high gate impedance while R D is selected automatically by computer program according to the bias conditions which is 33 or 100 kΩ typically. Measured channel current noise spectral densities (SID) at different gate-source voltages for NMOS and PMOS are shown in Figures 4 and 5.

Figure  4.  Measured low-frequency noise in the NMOS at different Vgs.
Figure  5.  Measured low-frequency noise in the PMOS at different Vgs.

As shown in Figures 4 and 5,channel current noise power spectral density follows a 1/fγ law which ascribes to fluctuations of the interfacial oxide charge due to the dynamic trapping and de-trapping of free carriers into slow oxide traps. The values of γ are 0.84 and 1 for NMOS and PMOS,respectively. The frequency exponent γ deviates from 1 if the trap density is not uniform in depth[16]. γ <1 is expected when the trap density is higher close to the gate oxide/silicon interface than that in the interior of the gate oxide,and γ>1 for the opposite case. Based on the extracted results in Figures 4 and 5,the interfacial trap density in the NMOS is larger than that in the gate oxide,while the trap density is uniform in the PMOS.

Noise measurements were performed in the ohmic range as a function of the effective gate voltage at low V DS biases. Therefore,the normalized channel current noise spectral density versus channel current in the NMOS and PMOS are shown in Figure 6. By considering the carrier number fluctuation mechanism,the normalized channel current noise power spectral density can be expressed by[13, 17]:

SIDI2ds=(gmIds)2Svfb,

(6)
Figure  6.  Normalized channel current noise power spectral density versus channel current in the NMOS and PMOS (Dot: measurement results, Lines: fitting results).

where Svfb is the flat-band voltage noise power spectral density and gm is transconductance. Based on Figure 6,the extracted Svfb are about 7.5 × 10-12 V2/Hz and 6 × 10-11 V2/Hz in the NMOS and PMOS,respectively. By using Equation(6),the fitting results of SID/I DS2 in the NMOS are shown in Figure 6 which shows good agreement with the measured results which also illustrate the main origin of noise in the NMOS is fluctuations of interfacial carrier number. The fitting results of SID/IDS2 in the PMOS also show good agreement with the measured results when the effective gate voltage is near the threshold voltage. However,for larger effective gate voltages,there was considerable diversity between fitting results and measured results when PMOS is operated in the strong inversion region. The above results show low frequency in the PMOS is dominated by carrier number fluctuation mechanism in the sub-threshold region while it is dominated by carrier mobility fluctuation mechanism in the strong inversion region.

The relationship between Svfb and the trap density close to the SiO2/Si interface can be expressed by[9, 18]:

Nt=WL(Cox+Cd+Cit)2fq2KTλSVfb,

(7)

where λ is the tunnel attenuation distance (about 0.1 nm in the gate oxide). Therefore,estimation of average trap density close to the SiO2/Si interface is deduced from Equation (7) and gives Nt=3.94×1017 cm-3eV-1 for NMOS and Nt=3.56×1018cm-3eV-1 for PMOS.

In contrast to McWhorter's carrier number fluctuation theory,Hooge claimed the 1/f noise may originate from noise in lattice scattering,which in turn causes random mobility fluctuation. According to Hooge's empirical law[19, 20],the normalized drain current noise power spectral density (SID/IDS2) could be expressed by:

SID/I2D=αHqfWLCox(VgsVth),

(8)

where aH is an empirical dimensionless constant which is also called Hooge's parameter. The aH is technology-/material-dependent and could be considered as a device/material quality indicator. From Equation (8),the values of aH can be deduced which are about 2.45 × 10-5 and 4 × 10-4 for NMOS and PMOS.

As shown in Figure 7,the extracted values of aH are similar in the PMOS when overdrive voltage is larger than 0.2 V which also illustrates noise in the PMOS is dominated by the mobility fluctuation mechanism. But for NMOS,the extracted values of aH are decreased with the increment of overdrive voltage which also illustrates noise in the NMOS is dominated by the number fluctuation mechanism.

Figure  7.  Extracted Hooge’s parameter (aH) versus overdrive voltage(VgsVth) in the NMOS and PMOS.

The Hooge's parameter aH is frequently used as a figure of merit for the comparison for different device technologies and it is usually low for a higher electronic quality material. As reported by references,the modern IC-graded resistor has the lowest reported aH (∼10-6)[20]. Depending more on sample quality and preparation,aH for bulk silicon MOSFETs and resistors can have a wide distribution and be as high as 4 × 10-4 [21]. In addition,aH is about 3×10-5 to 1 × 10-2 in the SOI devices [22],10-3 to 10-2 for poly-Si thin film transistors[23],10-3 for indium zinc oxide thin film transistors,2 × 10-2 to 10-1 for amorphous silicon thin film transistors[24] and 10-2 for organic thin film transistors[25]. The calculated results in Figure 7 illustrate the quality in these bulk silicon devices are much better than other types of semiconductor devices.

In the sub-threshold region,low-frequency noise in the MOSFET is dominated by carrier number fluctuation mechanism,thus channel current noise power spectral density SID can be expressed by[13, 21]:

SID(f)=q4λNtKTWLf(Cox+Cd+Cit)2I2ds.

(9)

In the BSIM unified compact models,SID in the sub-threshold region can be modeled as:

SID(f)=NOIAKTWLfEFN2(1/λ)I2ds,

(10)

where N*=KT/q2(Cox+Cd+Cit),NOIA and EF are fitting parameters. By use of Equations (9) and (10),NOIA can be deduced and gives NOIA ≈Nt[21, 26]. Therefore,the extracted values of\,NOIA in the NMOS and PMOS are about 3.94 × 1017 and 3.56 × 1018 cm-3eV-1 respectively,which are similar to the reported values (2.5 × 1016 and 1.56 × 1018 cm-3eV-1) in the NMOS processed in the 0.8 and 0.25 um technology nodes. Based on Equation (10),noise characteristics in the sub-threshold region for NMOS and PMOS can be simulated by use of extracted NOIA values,which shows good agreement with the measured results.

In the strong inversion region,based on BSIM compact model,SID can be expressed by[10-13, 21]:

SID=qKTμeffIdsCoxL2fEF[NOIAlgN0+NNL+N+NOIB(N0NL)+NOIC2N20N2L]+ΔLclmKTI2dsqWL2fEF×NOIA+NOIBNL+NOICN2L(NL+N)2,t

(11)

where ΔLclm is the channel length reduction due to channel length modulation effect,NOIB and NOIC are fitting parameters,N0 and NL are the charge densities at the source and drain side respectively which can be expressed by:

qN0=Cox(VgsVth),

(12)

qNL=Cox[VgsVthmin(Vds,Vds,sat)].

(13)

In the deep linear region,low-frequency noises are mostly dominated by mobility fluctuation mechanism and then the fitting parameters NOIA and NOIB can be ignored. By use of Equations (11) and (8),NOIB can be deduced and gives NOIB =qaH/KT. Thus,the extracted NOIB in the NMOS and PMOS are about 9.31 × 10-4 and 1.53 × 10-2 V-1,respectively. Based on the above extracted NOIB values,low-frequency noise characteristics can be simulated,as shown in Figure 9. For PMOS,the simulated results show good agreement with measured results which illustrate noise measured in the deep linear region for PMOS is dominated by carrier mobility fluctuation mechanism. However,the simulated results for NMOS deviates from the measured results which illustrate noise measured in the deep linear region for NMOS is affected by carrier number fluctuation mechanism. Therefore,the extracted values of NOIB in the NMOS are decreased with the increment of overdrive voltage[13].

Figure  8.  Measured and simulated results of channel current noise power spectral density in the sub-threshold region (Dots: measured results, Lines: simulated results).
Figure  9.  Measured and simulated results of channel current noise power spectral density in the deep linear region (Dots: measured results, Lines: simulated results).

Low-frequency noise behaviors in the NMOS and PMOS were investigated in the weak and strong inversion region. The measured results show noises in the NMOS were dominated by number fluctuation mechanism and noises in the sub-threshold region for PMOS were dominated by number fluctuation mechanism while noises in the strong inversion region for PMOS were dominated by mobility fluctuation mechanism. The flat-band voltage noise power spectral densities were extracted and then the trap densities near SiO2/Si interface were calculated. The average Hooge's parameters were also calculated by considering mobility fluctuation mechanism. Based on BSIM compact model,the extracted values of NOIA and NOIB are constants for PMOS. For NMOS,NOIA is constant and NOIB is decreased with the increment of overdrive voltage. The simulated noise results show good agreement with the measured results by using extracted fitting parameters.



[1]
Lopez D, Haendler S, Leyris C, et al. Low-frequency noise investigation and noise variability analysis in high-k/metal gate 32-nm CMOS transistors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2011, 58(8):2310
[2]
Jerng A, Sodini C G. The impact of devices type and sizing on phase noise mechanisms. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2005, 40(2):360
[3]
Jones B K. Electrical noise as a reliability indicator in electronic devices and components. IEE Proceedings-Circuits Devices and Systems, 2002, 149(1):13
[4]
Ciofi C, Neri B. Low-frequency noise measurements as a characterization tool for degradation phenomena in solid-state devices. J Phys D, 2000, 33(21):R199
[5]
Liu Y, Wu W J, Li B, et al. Analysis of low-frequency noise in the amorphous indium zinc oxide thin film transistors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(9):098503
[6]
Chen W H, Du L, Yin X S, et al. Shot noise measurement methods in electronic devices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(10):107202
[7]
Liu Y, Wu W J, Quang L, et al. Temperature-dependent drain current characteristics and low frequency noises in indium zinc oxide thin film transistors. Chinese Physics Letters, 2015, 32(8):088506
[8]
Cozzi S A, Labate L, Stella R. Extraction of scalable electrical model for a SOI JFET using BSIM3 model. Microelectron J, 2013, 44(1):39
[9]
Ioannidis E G, Dimitriadis C A, Haendler S, et al. Improved analysis and modeling of low-frequency noise in nanoscale MOSFETs. Solid-State Electron, 2012, 76:54
[10]
Allogo Y A, de Murcia M, Vildeuil J C, et al. 1/f noise measurements in n-channel MOSFETs processed in 0.25μm technology. Solid-State Electron, 2002, 46:361
[11]
Hung K K, Ko P K, Hu C, et al. A unified model for the flicker noise in metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 1990, 37(3):654
[12]
Hung K K, Ko P K, Hu C, et al. A physics-based MOSFET noise model for circuit simulators. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 1990, 37(5):1323
[13]
Vildeuil J C, Valenza M, Rigaud D. Extraction of the BSIM31/f noise parameters in CMOS transistors. Microelectron J, 1999, 30:199
[14]
Arora N 2007 MOSFET Modeling for VLSI Simulation:Theory and Practice (Singapore:World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd)
[15]
Simoen E, Claeys C. On the flicker noise in submicron silicon MOSFETs. Solid-State Electron, 1999, 43(5):865
[16]
Jayaraman R, Sodini C G. A 1/f noise technique to extract the oxide trap density near the conduction band edge of silicon. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 1989, 36(9):1773
[17]
Liu Y, Wu W J, En Y F, et al. Total dose ionizing radiation effects in the indium-zinc oxide thin-film transistors. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2014, 35(3):369
[18]
Valenza M, Hoffmann A, Sodini D, et al. Overview of the impact of on 1/f noise in p-MOSFETs downscaling technology to 90 nm. IEE Proceedings-Circuits Devices and Systems, 2004, 151(2):102
[19]
Hooge F N. 1/f noise sources. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 1994, 41(11):1926
[20]
Vandamme L K J, Hooge F N. What do we certainly know about 1/f noise in MOSTs. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2008, 55(11):3070
[21]
von Haartman M, Malm B G, Ostling M. Comprehensive study on low frequency noise and mobility in Si and SiGe pMOSFETs with high-k gate dielectrics and TiN gate. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2006, 53(4):836
[22]
Liu Y, Chen H B, Liu Y R, et al. Low frequency noise and radiation response in the partially depleted SOI MOSFETs with ion implanted buried oxide. Chinese Physics B, 2015, 24(8):088503
[23]
Mercha A, Pichon L, Carin R, et al. Grain boundary trap passivation in polysilicon thin film transistor investigated by low frequency noise. Thin Solid Films, 2001, 383(1/2):303
[24]
Rhayem J, Rigaud D, Valenza M, et al. 1/f noise modeling in long channel amorphous silicon thin film transistors. J Appl Phys, 2000, 87(4):1983
[25]
Vandamme L K J, Feyaerts R, Trefan G, et al. 1/f noise in pentacene and poly-thienylene vinylene thin film transistors. J Appl Phys, 2002, 91(2):719
[26]
Wang F, Celik-Butler Z. An improved physics-based 1/f noise model for deep submicron MOSFETs. Solid-State Electron, 2001, 45(2):351
Fig. 1.  The measurement setup for low-frequency noise in the MOSFETs.

Fig. 2.  Transfer characteristics in the n-channel MOSFET.

Fig. 3.  Transfer characteristics in the p-channel MOSFET.

Fig. 4.  Measured low-frequency noise in the NMOS at different Vgs.

Fig. 5.  Measured low-frequency noise in the PMOS at different Vgs.

Fig. 6.  Normalized channel current noise power spectral density versus channel current in the NMOS and PMOS (Dot: measurement results, Lines: fitting results).

Fig. 7.  Extracted Hooge’s parameter (aH) versus overdrive voltage(VgsVth) in the NMOS and PMOS.

Fig. 8.  Measured and simulated results of channel current noise power spectral density in the sub-threshold region (Dots: measured results, Lines: simulated results).

Fig. 9.  Measured and simulated results of channel current noise power spectral density in the deep linear region (Dots: measured results, Lines: simulated results).

[1]
Lopez D, Haendler S, Leyris C, et al. Low-frequency noise investigation and noise variability analysis in high-k/metal gate 32-nm CMOS transistors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2011, 58(8):2310
[2]
Jerng A, Sodini C G. The impact of devices type and sizing on phase noise mechanisms. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2005, 40(2):360
[3]
Jones B K. Electrical noise as a reliability indicator in electronic devices and components. IEE Proceedings-Circuits Devices and Systems, 2002, 149(1):13
[4]
Ciofi C, Neri B. Low-frequency noise measurements as a characterization tool for degradation phenomena in solid-state devices. J Phys D, 2000, 33(21):R199
[5]
Liu Y, Wu W J, Li B, et al. Analysis of low-frequency noise in the amorphous indium zinc oxide thin film transistors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(9):098503
[6]
Chen W H, Du L, Yin X S, et al. Shot noise measurement methods in electronic devices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(10):107202
[7]
Liu Y, Wu W J, Quang L, et al. Temperature-dependent drain current characteristics and low frequency noises in indium zinc oxide thin film transistors. Chinese Physics Letters, 2015, 32(8):088506
[8]
Cozzi S A, Labate L, Stella R. Extraction of scalable electrical model for a SOI JFET using BSIM3 model. Microelectron J, 2013, 44(1):39
[9]
Ioannidis E G, Dimitriadis C A, Haendler S, et al. Improved analysis and modeling of low-frequency noise in nanoscale MOSFETs. Solid-State Electron, 2012, 76:54
[10]
Allogo Y A, de Murcia M, Vildeuil J C, et al. 1/f noise measurements in n-channel MOSFETs processed in 0.25μm technology. Solid-State Electron, 2002, 46:361
[11]
Hung K K, Ko P K, Hu C, et al. A unified model for the flicker noise in metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 1990, 37(3):654
[12]
Hung K K, Ko P K, Hu C, et al. A physics-based MOSFET noise model for circuit simulators. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 1990, 37(5):1323
[13]
Vildeuil J C, Valenza M, Rigaud D. Extraction of the BSIM31/f noise parameters in CMOS transistors. Microelectron J, 1999, 30:199
[14]
Arora N 2007 MOSFET Modeling for VLSI Simulation:Theory and Practice (Singapore:World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd)
[15]
Simoen E, Claeys C. On the flicker noise in submicron silicon MOSFETs. Solid-State Electron, 1999, 43(5):865
[16]
Jayaraman R, Sodini C G. A 1/f noise technique to extract the oxide trap density near the conduction band edge of silicon. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 1989, 36(9):1773
[17]
Liu Y, Wu W J, En Y F, et al. Total dose ionizing radiation effects in the indium-zinc oxide thin-film transistors. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2014, 35(3):369
[18]
Valenza M, Hoffmann A, Sodini D, et al. Overview of the impact of on 1/f noise in p-MOSFETs downscaling technology to 90 nm. IEE Proceedings-Circuits Devices and Systems, 2004, 151(2):102
[19]
Hooge F N. 1/f noise sources. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 1994, 41(11):1926
[20]
Vandamme L K J, Hooge F N. What do we certainly know about 1/f noise in MOSTs. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2008, 55(11):3070
[21]
von Haartman M, Malm B G, Ostling M. Comprehensive study on low frequency noise and mobility in Si and SiGe pMOSFETs with high-k gate dielectrics and TiN gate. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2006, 53(4):836
[22]
Liu Y, Chen H B, Liu Y R, et al. Low frequency noise and radiation response in the partially depleted SOI MOSFETs with ion implanted buried oxide. Chinese Physics B, 2015, 24(8):088503
[23]
Mercha A, Pichon L, Carin R, et al. Grain boundary trap passivation in polysilicon thin film transistor investigated by low frequency noise. Thin Solid Films, 2001, 383(1/2):303
[24]
Rhayem J, Rigaud D, Valenza M, et al. 1/f noise modeling in long channel amorphous silicon thin film transistors. J Appl Phys, 2000, 87(4):1983
[25]
Vandamme L K J, Feyaerts R, Trefan G, et al. 1/f noise in pentacene and poly-thienylene vinylene thin film transistors. J Appl Phys, 2002, 91(2):719
[26]
Wang F, Celik-Butler Z. An improved physics-based 1/f noise model for deep submicron MOSFETs. Solid-State Electron, 2001, 45(2):351
1

Comparative study of leakage power in CNTFET over MOSFET device

Sanjeet Kumar Sinha, Saurabh Chaudhury

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 114002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/114002

2

Effect of p-d exchange with an itinerant carrier in a GaMnAs quantum dot

D. Lalitha, A. John Peter

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(7): 072001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/7/072001

3

Continuous analytic I–V model for GS DG MOSFETs including hot-carrier degradation effects

Toufik Bentrcia, Faycal Djeffal, Abdel Hamid Benhaya

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(1): 014001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/1/014001

4

30-GHz millimeter-wave carrier generation with single sideband modulation based on stimulated Brillouin scattering

Luo Zhen'ao, Xie Liang, Qi Xiaoqiong, Wang Hui

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(9): 092004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/9/092004

5

Short channel effect in deep submicron PDSOI nMOSFETs

Bu Jianhui, Bi Jinshun, Song Limei, Han Zhengsheng

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(1): 014002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/1/014002

6

Structure optimization of a uni-traveling-carrier photodiode with introduction of a hydro-dynamic model

Li Guoyu, Zhang Yejin, Li Xiaojian, Tian Lilin

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(10): 104005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/10/104005

7

Effects of the reciprocating parameters of the carrier on material removal rate and non-uniformity in CMP

Wang Cailing, Kang Renke, Jin Zhuji, Guo Dongming

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(12): 126001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/12/126001

8

Low-field mobility and carrier transport mechanism transition in nanoscale MOSFETs

Liu Hongwei, Wang Runsheng, Huang Ru, Zhang Xing

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(4): 044006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/4/044006

9

Hot carrier effects of SOI NMOS

Chen Jianjun, Chen Shuming, Liang Bin, Liu Biwei, Liu Zheng, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(7): 074006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/7/074006

10

1/fγ Noise Characteristics of an n-MOSFET Under DC Hot Carrier Stress

Liu Yu'an, Yu Xiaoguang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(7): 1263-1267.

11

A Forecast Technique for Radiation-Resistant Capability on MOSFETs

Peng Shaoquan, Du Lei, Zhuang Yiqi, Bao Junlin, Liu Jiang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(7): 1360-1364.

12

Design of a Monolithic CMOS LC-Voltage Controlled Oscillator with Low Phase Noise for 4GHz Frequency Synthesizers

Tang Lu, Wang Zhigong, Huang Ting, Li Zhiqun

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(3): 459-466.

13

Characteristics of Nanometer MOSFETs with Mechanical Strain in the Channel

Wu Tao, Du Gang, Liu Xiaoyan, Kang Jinfeng, Han Ruqi, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(S1): 415-418.

14

2D Threshold-Voltage Model for High-k Gate-Dielectric MOSFETs

Ji Feng, Xu Jingping, Lai P T, Chen Weibing, Li Yanping, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(10): 1725-1731.

15

Device Simulation of Nano-Scale MOSFETs Based on Bandstructure Calculation

Yu Zhiping, Tian Lilin

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(S1): 248-251.

16

Refinement of an Analytical Approximation of the Surface Potential in MOSFETs

Lu Jingxue, Huang Fengyi, Wang Zhigong, Wu Wengang

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(7): 1155-1158.

17

Study of Electron Mobility in 4H-SiC Buried-Channel MOSFETs

Gao Jinxia, Zhang Yimen, Zhang Yuming

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 283-289.

18

A Modified DSOI Device

JIANG Bo, HE Ping, TIAN Li-lin, LIN Xi

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2002, 23(9): 966-971.

19

Unified MOSFET Short Channel Factor Using Variational Method

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2000, 21(5): 431-436.

20

Determination of Threshold Voltage and Mobility of MOSFET by Proportional Difference Operator

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2000, 21(12): 1198-1202.

1. He, B., He, G., Zhu, L. et al. Electrospun Highly Aligned IGZO Nanofiber Arrays with Low-Thermal-Budget for Challenging Transistor and Integrated Electronics. Advanced Functional Materials, 2023. doi:10.1002/adfm.202310264
2. Hao, M., Shao, M., Zhang, Y. et al. Study on amplitude of the noise power spectrum for nano-strained Si NMOSFET. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids, 2022, 177(3-4): 258-266. doi:10.1080/10420150.2021.2025058
3. Dubey, A., Narang, R., Saxena, M. et al. Total ionizing dose effects in junctionless accumulation mode MOSFET. Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing, 2021, 127(3): 189. doi:10.1007/s00339-021-04313-2
4. Liu, Y., Cai, S.-T., Han, C.-Y. et al. Scaling Down Effect on Low Frequency Noise in Polycrystalline Silicon Thin-Film Transistors. IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society, 2019. doi:10.1109/JEDS.2018.2890737
5. Liu, Y., He, H., Chen, R. et al. Analysis and Simulation of Low-Frequency Noise in Indium-Zinc-Oxide Thin-Film Transistors. IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society, 2018, 6(1): 271-279. doi:10.1109/JEDS.2018.2800049
6. Luo, J.-W., Li, S.-S., Zunger, A. Rapid Transition of the Hole Rashba Effect from Strong Field Dependence to Saturation in Semiconductor Nanowires. Physical Review Letters, 2017, 119(12): 126401. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.126401
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Yuan Liu, Yurong Liu, Yujuan He, Bin Li, Yunfei En, Wenxiao Fang. Low-frequency noise characteristics in the MOSFETs processed in 65 nm technology[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(6): 064012. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064012
    Y Liu, Y R Liu, Y J He, B Li, Y F En, W X Fang. Low-frequency noise characteristics in the MOSFETs processed in 65 nm technology[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(6): 064012. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064012.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 3462 Times PDF downloads: 48 Times Cited by: 6 Times

    History

    Received: 20 September 2015 Revised: 30 November 2015 Online: Published: 01 June 2016

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Yuan Liu, Yurong Liu, Yujuan He, Bin Li, Yunfei En, Wenxiao Fang. Low-frequency noise characteristics in the MOSFETs processed in 65 nm technology[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(6): 064012. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064012 ****Y Liu, Y R Liu, Y J He, B Li, Y F En, W X Fang. Low-frequency noise characteristics in the MOSFETs processed in 65 nm technology[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(6): 064012. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064012.
      Citation:
      Yuan Liu, Yurong Liu, Yujuan He, Bin Li, Yunfei En, Wenxiao Fang. Low-frequency noise characteristics in the MOSFETs processed in 65 nm technology[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(6): 064012. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064012 ****
      Y Liu, Y R Liu, Y J He, B Li, Y F En, W X Fang. Low-frequency noise characteristics in the MOSFETs processed in 65 nm technology[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(6): 064012. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064012.

      Low-frequency noise characteristics in the MOSFETs processed in 65 nm technology

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064012
      Funds:

      the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation No. 2014A030313656

      Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61574048, 61204112) and the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (No. 2014A030313656)

      Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Nos. 61574048, 61204112

      More Information
      • Corresponding author: liuyuan@ceprei.com
      • Received Date: 2015-09-20
      • Revised Date: 2015-11-30
      • Published Date: 2016-06-01

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return