Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2018, Volume 39 > Issue 3 > 034001

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES

Room temperature continuous wave operation of quantum cascade laser at λ ~ 9.4 μm

Chuncai Hou1, 2, 3, Yue Zhao1, 2, 3, Jinchuan Zhang1, 2, 3, , Shenqiang Zhai1, 2, 3, Ning Zhuo1, 2, 3, Junqi Liu1, 2, 3, Lijun Wang1, 2, 3, Shuman Liu1, 2, 3, Fengqi Liu1, 2, 3, and Zhanguo Wang1, 2, 3

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Jinchuan Zhang, zhangjinchuan@semi.ac.cn; Fengqi Liu, fqliu@semi.ac.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/3/034001

PDF

Turn off MathJax

Abstract: Continuous wave (CW) operation of long wave infrared (LWIR) quantum cascade lasers (QCLs) is achieved up to a temperature of 303 K. For room temperature CW operation, the wafer with 35 stages was processed into buried heterostructure lasers. For a 2-mm-long and 10-μm-wide laser with high-reflectivity (HR) coating on the rear facet, CW output power of 45 mW at 283 K and 9 mW at 303 K is obtained. The lasing wavelength is around 9.4 μm locating in the LWIR spectrum range.

Key words: quantum cascade laserlong wave infrareddouble-phonon resonance

Quantum cascade lasers (QCLs), as a unipolar semiconductor light source, were invented more than twenty years ago and are performing increasingly important roles in both middle-wave infrared (MWIR, λ = 3–5 μm) and long wave infrared (LWIR, λ = 8–12 μm)[1, 2]. Unlike traditional bipolar semiconductor laser devices, stimulated emission of QCLs is based on the intersubband transition of electrons in the conduction band[3, 4], and the internal quantum efficiency is furthermore increased by using a cascade effect. Due to their low electrical power consumption and miniature size, QCLs can be packaged into compact and portable systems, which have been widely applied[5]. The MWIR and LWIR QCLs are particularly attractive since a large number of molecular species have their “fingerprint” absorption in this spectrum range[68]. Watt-level of light power has been obtained in MWIR[911]. The development of LWIR QCLs has been lagging behind, however. The room temperature (RT) continuous wave (CW) operation of LWIR QCL can be obtained by few groups, especially when the wavelength is longer than 9 μm[1214]. This is because there exists an intrinsic technological challenge in the LWIR, such as the increased absorption losses, the decreased optical confinement, the lower intersubband gain and so on[1517]. All these factors contribute to gradually worsening device performances as the lasing wavelength moves toward the far-IR end of the LWIR window. One bit of good news from the QCLs in the LWIR is that the bandgap offset can be exploited for lattice-matched InGaAs/InAlAs/InP or a slight strain material system, which is propitious to the growth of ultrathin layer heterostructure material. In contrast, the QCLs in the MWIR need highly strained material growth to improve the electronic confinement.

In this letter, we present an LWIR QCL with a continuous wave (CW) operating temperature up to 303 K. The active region is designed with a double-phonon resonant structure and grown with strain-compensation technology. For a 2-mm-long and 10-μm-wide QCL with high-reflectivity (HR) coating on the rear facet, CW output power of 45 mW at 283 K and 9 mW at 303 K is obtained, at a lasing wavelength of ~ 9.4 μm.

The QCL structure, designed according to double-phonon resonance theory, was grown on an n-doped (Si, 2 × 1017 cm−3) InP substrate wafer by solid-source molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). The active core structure presented in this paper is similar to Ref. [12], containing 30 periods of lattice-matched In0.6Ga0.4As/In0.44Al0.56As quantum wells and barriers. The specific layer sequence of one period, is as follows: (layer thickness in nanometers): 4.0/1.9/0.7/5.8/0.9/5.7/0.9/5.0/2.2/3.4/ 1.4/3.3/1.3/3.2/1.5/3.1/1.9/3.0/2.3/2.9/2.5/2.9, where InAlAs barrier layers are in bold, InGaAs well layers are in roman, and n-doped layers (2 × 1017 cm−3) are underlined. The complete structure of the QCL wafer layer sequence is: 4 μm lower InP cladding layer (Si, 3 × 1016 cm−3), 0.3-μm-thick n-In0.53Ga0.47As layer (Si, 4 × 1016 cm−3), 30 active/injector stages, 0.3-μm-thick n-In0.53Ga0.47As layer (Si, 4 × 1016 cm−3), 2.6 μm upper cladding layer (Si, 3 × 1016 cm−3), 0.15 μm gradually doped layer (changing from 1 × 1017 to 3 × 1017 cm−3) and 0.8 μm highly doped cladding layer (Si, 5 × 1018 cm−3).

The QCL wafer was then fabricated into a double channel ridge waveguide with an average active core width of 10 μm by conventional photolithography and a nonselective wet chemical etching. After etching, InP:Fe was grown by metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) in the channel, which would decrease the waveguide loss and increase the heat dissipation of the devices. Then a layer of 450-nm-thick SiO2 was deposited as an electrical insulation by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). Then a Ti/Au layer as the top contact was deposited by e-beam evaporation, next a 5-μm-thick Au layer was electroplated to better conduct the current and heat on the laser surface. After the wafer was thinned down to 120 μm, the Ge/Au/Ni/Au metal contacts were formed as the substrate layer. Finally, the waveguide was then cleaved into 2-mm-long laser bars and the rear facets were coated with high reflection (HR) coating consisting of Al2O3/Ti/Au/Ti/Al2O3 (200/10/100/10/120 nm). The lasers were soldered epilayer side down onto diamond platelet, which was mounted on the copper heat sink with indium solder. Then the lasers were wire bonded and a thermistor was fixed on the heat sinks close to the laser chip to monitor the temperature.

The one-dimensional mode characteristic is studied for the LWIR QCL device with comsol, as shown in Fig. 1. The optical confinement factor of Г = 47% is calculated, which is defined as the ratio of the light confined in the InGaAs layer and active region, and the light in all the waveguide. The calculated effective refractive index neff = 3.16 + 1.11 × 10−4i, thus the waveguide loss αw = (4π/λ) × 1.11 × 10−4i is 1.48 cm−1, which is higher than the MWIR devices[18]. The reflection coefficient R1 of the front facet is around 27%, which is estimated with Fresnel relation R = (neff − 1)2/(neff + 1)2, and the rear facet R2 is around 97% with HR coating. The mirror loss αm = 2.23 cm−1 is calculated with the formula αm = (1/2L)ln (1/R1R2).

The heat sink was then fixed on a metal sheet of which the temperature was monitored and adjusted by a thermistor and a thermoelectric cooler (TEC). The temperature of the heat sink is controlled very close to the metal sheet under CW operation at 283–303 K. The optical power from the uncoated facet of the laser was measured with a calibrated thermopile detector placed directly in front of the laser facet. The laser spectra were measured with a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer in rapid scan mode with a resolution of 0.25 cm−1.

Fig. 2(a) shows the optical power–current–voltage (PIV) curve of a 10-μm-wide and 2-mm-long coated HR on the rear facet, operating at different heat sink temperatures from 283 to 303 K. The power is up to 45 mW at 283 K with a threshold current density of 4 kA/cm2 and decreases to 9 mW when the temperature increases to 303 K. Fig. 2(b) shows that the pulsed peak output power of 100 mW is obtained at 283 K corresponding to 70 mW at 303 K with a repetition frequency of 5 kHz and a duty circle of 1%. The slope efficiency of the device at pulsed mode is 260 mW/A at 293 K. In this view, the device with more stages exhibiting the lower threshold is suitable for high temperature CW operation. The slope efficiency of the device can be described as

Figure  2.  (Color online) (a) Output light power versus injection current of a 2-mm-long and 10-μm-wide QCL in CW operation mode at different heat sink temperatures between 283 and 303 K along with V–I curves at 293 K. (b) Peak power of the same device changes with the injection current at the repetition frequency of 5 kHz and a duty circle of 1%.
dPdI=hνeNpαmαw+αmηi,

where is the photon energy, e is the elemental electronic charge, Np is the cascade period number, and ηi is the internal quantum efficiency of each period. Using the parameters obtained from Fig. 1, the internal quantum efficiency is around 11% per cascade period at 293 K. The internal quantum efficiency is lower than the MWIR for the reasons mentioned in the introduction[18].

Figure  1.  (Color online) Mode characteristic according to the real part of the refractive index along the growth direction of the device structure with a Drude–Lorentz solver.

The spectrum characteristic of LWIR QCL is shown in Fig. 3. The emission frequency ν of a QCL can be tuned over a small range by changing the current and temperature. Fig. 3(a) shows the normalized CW lasing spectra at a current of 1.02 Ith with temperature ranging from 283 to 303 K with a step of 5 K of the device. The single lasing mode frequency changes from 1070.9 cm−1 at 283 K to 1058.7 cm−1 at 303 K. Fig. 3(b) demonstrates the CW lasing spectra of the same device at different injection currents, from 0.85 to 1 A, with a step of 0.03 A at 288 K, the single mode frequency changes from 1066.3 to 1065.0 cm−1 corresponding to the electrical power tuning coefficient ∆ν/∆P of −0.537 cm−1W−1. The characteristic of a single mode is obvious in spite of no grating modulating the optical mode. This can be explained by the narrow electrical luminescence spectrum shown in the insert of Fig. 3(a). Besides, we have tried the external-cavity experiment with the device, which only has a narrow tunable range around 40 cm−1.

Figure  3.  (Color online) (a) CW emitting spectrum of QCL at different heat sink temperature between 283 and 303 K. The insert shows the electrical luminescence spectrum. (b) CW lasing spectra at a different injection current from 0.85 to 1.0 A with a step of 0.03 A. The inset shows the linear-fit tuning characteristics of the lasing frequency with electrical power for the same device.

In order to investigate the thermal behavior, we measured the threshold current characteristic at the different heatsink temperatures in CW and pulsed mode shown in Fig. 4. The red line fits with the exponential function Jth = J0exp(T/T0), where Jth is the threshold current density, J0 is the constant and T0 is the characteristic temperature[18]. The T0 is 238 K for the pulsed mode. Generally, due to the low heat conductivity of InGaAs/InAlAs ultrathin layer, the heat dissipation for the active region in CW operation mode is poor, thus the core temperature Tact of the QCL is much higher than the heatsink temperature Tsink. As a result, the threshold current increases more rapidly with a higher value in CW mode than in pulsed mode as the temperature is increased. From 283 to 303 K, T0 decreases to 128 K for CW mode. For high temperature and high power CW operation, the lower threshold power density and weaker temperature dependence are required.

Figure  4.  (Color online) Threshold current density as a function of heat sink temperature in CW and pulsed mode of a 2-mm-long and 10-μm-wide LWIR QCL. The red line is fitted with the exponential function Jth = J0exp(T/T0).

The far-field measurement was done by mounting the laser on a computer controlled rotational stage with a step resolution of 0.05°. A room temperature operation HgCdTe detector was located 35 cm away from the QCL to collect the lasing light. Fig. 5 shows the measured lateral far-field radiation patterns of the LWIR QCL with the black dash and the fitted result of Gauss function with the red line. The measured full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the far-field pattern is 30°, which can be explained by the diffraction limit formula sinθ = 1.22λ/D, where θ is the diffraction angle, λ is the lasing wavelength and D is the width of the waveguide. The insert shows a spot of a laser beam emitted from the device collimated by an aspheric lens. The image was taken by a calibrated thermopile Infrared camera (Pyrocam III), indicating that the lasing mode occurs in fundamental mode both at the fast axis and slow axis direction.

Figure  5.  (Color online) Measured lateral far-field radiation patterns for the devices at pulsed driving currents of 0.85 A under 50 kHz repetition frequency and 1% duty circle, the dash is the measurement and the red line is the result fitted with the Gauss function. The inset shows the spot of a laser beam emitted from the device collimated by the aspheric lens.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated the CW operation of LWIR QCLs with a wavelength around 9.4 μm. The devices were fabricated as buried heterostructure lasers with semi-insulated InP:Fe to improve the heat dissipation capacity and decrease waveguide loss. The CW operating temperature is up to 303 K, which shows a good potential for practical applications.

The authors would like to acknowledge Ping Liang and Ying Hu for their help with device fabrication.



[1]
Faist J, Capasso F, Sivco D L, et al. Quantum cascade laser. Science, 1994, 264: 553 doi: 10.1126/science.264.5158.553
[2]
Vitiello M S, Scalari G, Williams B, et al. Quantum cascade lasers: 20 years of challenges. Optics Express, 2015, 23: 5167 doi: 10.1364/OE.23.005167
[3]
Kazarinov R F, Suris R. Possibility of amplification of electromagnetic waves in a semiconductor with a superlattice. Soviet Phys, 1971, 5: 707
[4]
Kastalsky A, Goldman V, Abeles J. Possibility of infrared laser in a resonant tunneling structure. Appl Phys Lett, 1991, 59: 2636 doi: 10.1063/1.105922
[5]
Razeghi M, Lu Q Y, Bandyopadhyay N, et al. Quantum cascade lasers: from tool to product. Optics Express, 2015, 23: 8462 doi: 10.1364/OE.23.008462
[6]
Kosterev A A, ad Tittel F K. Chemical sensors based on quantum cascade lasers. IEEE J Quantum Electron, 2002, 38: 582 doi: 10.1109/JQE.2002.1005408
[7]
Liu C W, Zhai S Q, Zhang J C, et al. Free-space communication based on quantum cascade laser. J Semicond, 2015, 36: 094009 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/9/094009
[8]
Kumar C, Patel C K N, Lyakh A. High power quantum cascade lasers for infrared countermeasures, targeting and illumination, beacons and standoff detection of explosives and CWAs. Proc SPIE, 2015, 9467: 946702 doi: 10.1117/12.2178050
[9]
Bai Y, Bandyopadhyay N, Tsao S et al. Room temperature quantum cascade lasers with 27% wall plug efficiency. Appl Phys Lett, 2011, 98: 181102 doi: 10.1063/1.3586773
[10]
Lu Q Y, Bai Y B, Bandyopadhyay N, et al. 2.4 W room temperature continuous wave operation of distributed feedback quantum cascade lasers. Appl Phys Lett, 2011, 98: 181106 doi: 10.1063/1.3588412
[11]
Lyakh A, Maulini R, Tsekoun A, et al. Tapered 4.7 μm quantum cascade lasers with highly strained active region composition delivering over 4.5 watts of continuous wave optical power. Opt Express, 2012, 20: 4382 doi: 10.1364/OE.20.004382
[12]
Beck M, Hofstetter D, Aellen T, et al. Continuous wave operation of a mid-infrared semiconductor laser at room temperature. Science, 2002, 295: 301 doi: 10.1126/science.1066408
[13]
Darvish S, Slivken S, Evans A, et al. Room-temperature, high-power, and continuous-wave operation of distributed-feedback quantum-cascade lasers at λ~9.6 μm. Appl Phys Lett, 2006, 88: 201114 doi: 10.1063/1.2205730
[14]
Baranov A N, Bahriz M, Teissier R. Room temperature continuous wave operation of InAs-based quantum cascade lasers at 15 μm. Opt Express, 2016, 24: 18799 doi: 10.1364/OE.24.018799
[15]
Fox M. Optical properties of solids. Am J Phys, 2002, 70: 1269
[16]
Troccoli M, Wang X, Fan J. Quantum cascade lasers: high-power emission and single-mode operation in the long-wave infrared (λ > 6 μm). Opt Eng, 2010, 49: 111106 doi: 10.1117/1.3498778
[17]
Troccoli M, Lyakh A, Fan J, et al. Long-wave IR quantum cascade lasers for emission in the λ = 8–12 μm spectral region. Opt Mater Express, 2013, 3: 1546 doi: 10.1364/OME.3.001546
[18]
Liang P, Liu F Q, Zhang J C, et al. High-power high-temperature continuous-wave operation of quantum cascade laser at λ~4.6 μm without lateral regrowth. Chin Phys Lett, 2012, 29: 074215 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/29/7/074215
Fig. 2.  (Color online) (a) Output light power versus injection current of a 2-mm-long and 10-μm-wide QCL in CW operation mode at different heat sink temperatures between 283 and 303 K along with V–I curves at 293 K. (b) Peak power of the same device changes with the injection current at the repetition frequency of 5 kHz and a duty circle of 1%.

Fig. 1.  (Color online) Mode characteristic according to the real part of the refractive index along the growth direction of the device structure with a Drude–Lorentz solver.

Fig. 3.  (Color online) (a) CW emitting spectrum of QCL at different heat sink temperature between 283 and 303 K. The insert shows the electrical luminescence spectrum. (b) CW lasing spectra at a different injection current from 0.85 to 1.0 A with a step of 0.03 A. The inset shows the linear-fit tuning characteristics of the lasing frequency with electrical power for the same device.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) Threshold current density as a function of heat sink temperature in CW and pulsed mode of a 2-mm-long and 10-μm-wide LWIR QCL. The red line is fitted with the exponential function Jth = J0exp(T/T0).

Fig. 5.  (Color online) Measured lateral far-field radiation patterns for the devices at pulsed driving currents of 0.85 A under 50 kHz repetition frequency and 1% duty circle, the dash is the measurement and the red line is the result fitted with the Gauss function. The inset shows the spot of a laser beam emitted from the device collimated by the aspheric lens.

[1]
Faist J, Capasso F, Sivco D L, et al. Quantum cascade laser. Science, 1994, 264: 553 doi: 10.1126/science.264.5158.553
[2]
Vitiello M S, Scalari G, Williams B, et al. Quantum cascade lasers: 20 years of challenges. Optics Express, 2015, 23: 5167 doi: 10.1364/OE.23.005167
[3]
Kazarinov R F, Suris R. Possibility of amplification of electromagnetic waves in a semiconductor with a superlattice. Soviet Phys, 1971, 5: 707
[4]
Kastalsky A, Goldman V, Abeles J. Possibility of infrared laser in a resonant tunneling structure. Appl Phys Lett, 1991, 59: 2636 doi: 10.1063/1.105922
[5]
Razeghi M, Lu Q Y, Bandyopadhyay N, et al. Quantum cascade lasers: from tool to product. Optics Express, 2015, 23: 8462 doi: 10.1364/OE.23.008462
[6]
Kosterev A A, ad Tittel F K. Chemical sensors based on quantum cascade lasers. IEEE J Quantum Electron, 2002, 38: 582 doi: 10.1109/JQE.2002.1005408
[7]
Liu C W, Zhai S Q, Zhang J C, et al. Free-space communication based on quantum cascade laser. J Semicond, 2015, 36: 094009 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/9/094009
[8]
Kumar C, Patel C K N, Lyakh A. High power quantum cascade lasers for infrared countermeasures, targeting and illumination, beacons and standoff detection of explosives and CWAs. Proc SPIE, 2015, 9467: 946702 doi: 10.1117/12.2178050
[9]
Bai Y, Bandyopadhyay N, Tsao S et al. Room temperature quantum cascade lasers with 27% wall plug efficiency. Appl Phys Lett, 2011, 98: 181102 doi: 10.1063/1.3586773
[10]
Lu Q Y, Bai Y B, Bandyopadhyay N, et al. 2.4 W room temperature continuous wave operation of distributed feedback quantum cascade lasers. Appl Phys Lett, 2011, 98: 181106 doi: 10.1063/1.3588412
[11]
Lyakh A, Maulini R, Tsekoun A, et al. Tapered 4.7 μm quantum cascade lasers with highly strained active region composition delivering over 4.5 watts of continuous wave optical power. Opt Express, 2012, 20: 4382 doi: 10.1364/OE.20.004382
[12]
Beck M, Hofstetter D, Aellen T, et al. Continuous wave operation of a mid-infrared semiconductor laser at room temperature. Science, 2002, 295: 301 doi: 10.1126/science.1066408
[13]
Darvish S, Slivken S, Evans A, et al. Room-temperature, high-power, and continuous-wave operation of distributed-feedback quantum-cascade lasers at λ~9.6 μm. Appl Phys Lett, 2006, 88: 201114 doi: 10.1063/1.2205730
[14]
Baranov A N, Bahriz M, Teissier R. Room temperature continuous wave operation of InAs-based quantum cascade lasers at 15 μm. Opt Express, 2016, 24: 18799 doi: 10.1364/OE.24.018799
[15]
Fox M. Optical properties of solids. Am J Phys, 2002, 70: 1269
[16]
Troccoli M, Wang X, Fan J. Quantum cascade lasers: high-power emission and single-mode operation in the long-wave infrared (λ > 6 μm). Opt Eng, 2010, 49: 111106 doi: 10.1117/1.3498778
[17]
Troccoli M, Lyakh A, Fan J, et al. Long-wave IR quantum cascade lasers for emission in the λ = 8–12 μm spectral region. Opt Mater Express, 2013, 3: 1546 doi: 10.1364/OME.3.001546
[18]
Liang P, Liu F Q, Zhang J C, et al. High-power high-temperature continuous-wave operation of quantum cascade laser at λ~4.6 μm without lateral regrowth. Chin Phys Lett, 2012, 29: 074215 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/29/7/074215
1

Experimental study on phase noise of terahertz quantum cascade laser frequency comb and dual-comb sources

Lulu Zheng, Xianglong Bi, Xuhong Ma, Guibin Liu, Binbin Liu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2024, 45(12): 122401. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24060028

2

High power λ ~ 8.5 μm quantum cascade laser grown by MOCVD operating continuous-wave up to 408 K

Teng Fei, Shenqiang Zhai, Jinchuan Zhang, Ning Zhuo, Junqi Liu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(11): 112301. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112301

3

Broad area quantum cascade lasers operating in pulsed mode above 100 ℃ at λ~4.7μm

Yue Zhao, Fangliang Yan, Jinchuan Zhang, Fengqi Liu, Ning Zhuo, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(7): 074005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/7/074005

4

Strain effect on intersubband transitions in rolled-up quantum well infrared photodetectors

Han Wang, Shilong Li, Honglou Zhen, Xiaofei Nie, Gaoshan Huang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(5): 054006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/5/054006

5

Free-space communication based on quantum cascade laser

Chuanwei Liu, Shenqiang Zhai, Jinchuan Zhang, Yuhong Zhou, Zhiwei Jia, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(9): 094009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/9/094009

6

Distributed feedback quantum cascade lasers operating in continuous-wave mode at λ ≈ 7.6 μm

Zhang Jinchuan, Wang Lijun, Liu Wanfeng, Liu Fengqi, Zhao Lihua, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(2): 024005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/2/024005

7

Porous waveguide facilitated low divergence quantum cascade laser

Yin Wen, Lu Quanyong, Liu Wanfeng, Zhang Jinchuan, Wang Lijun, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(6): 064008. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/6/064008

8

Holographic fabricated continuous wave operation of distributed feedback quantum cascade lasers at λ ≈ 8.5 μm

Zhang Jinchuan, Wang Lijun, Zhang Wei, Liu Wanfeng, Liu Junqi, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(4): 044008. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/4/044008

9

Analysis of surface emitting distributed-feedback quantum cascade laser based on a surface-plasmon waveguide

Guo Wanhong, Lu Quanyong, Liu Junqi, Zhang Wei, Jiang Yuchao, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(11): 114014. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/11/114014

10

Waveguide Simulation of a THz Si/SiGe Quantum Cascade Laser

Chen Rui, Lin Guijiang, Chen Songyan, Li Cheng, Lai Hongkai, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(5): 893-897.

11

One-Dimensional InP-Based Photonic Crystal Quantum Cascade Laser Emitting at 5.36μm

Li Lu, Shao Ye, Liu Junqi, Liu Fengqi, Wang Zhanguo, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(7): 1278-1280.

12

Self-Pulsation Dynamics in GaAs/AIGaAs Quantum Cascade Lasers

Liu Junqi, Liu Fengqi, Li Lu, Shao Ye, Guo Yu, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(S1): 44-47.

13

Waveguide Optimization for a 9.0μm GaAs-Based Quantum Cascade Laser

Li Lu, Liu Fengqi, Shao Ye, Liu Junqi, Wang Zhanguo, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(1): 31-35.

14

Influence of Polarization-Induced Electric Fields on Optical Properties of Intersubband Transitions in AlxGa1-xN/GaN Double Quantum Wells

Lei Shuangying, Shen Bo, Xu Fujun, Yang Zhijian, Xu Ke, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(3): 403-408.

15

9μm Cutoff 128×128 AlGaAs/GaAs Quantum Well Infrared Photodetector Focal Plane Arrays

Li Xianjie, Liu Yingbin, Feng Zhen, Guo Fan, Zhao Yonglin, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(8): 1355-1359.

16

MBE HgCdTe:A Challenge to the Realization of Third Generation Infrared FPAs

He Li, Chen Lu, Wu Jun, Wu Yan, Wang Yuanzhang, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(3): 381-387.

17

Energy Band Design for a Terahertz Si/SiGe Quantum Cascade Laser

Lin Guijiang, Lai Hongkai, Li Cheng, Chen Songyan, Yu Jinzhong, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(5): 916-920.

18

Single Mode Operation of Short-Cavity Quantum Cascade Lasers

Liu Fengqi, Guo Yu, Li Lu, Shao Ye, Liu Junqi, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(4): 679-682.

19

Monte Carlo Simulation of Impurity Scattering Effect in Resonant-Phonon-Assisted Terahertz Quantum-Cascade Lasers

Cao Juncheng, Lü Jingtao

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 304-308.

20

Room Temperature Operation of Strain-Compensated 5.5μm Quantum Cascade Lasers

Lu Xiuzhen, Liu Fengqi, Liu Junqi, Jin Peng, Wang Zhanguo, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(12): 2267-2270.

1. Luo, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y. et al. 9.4 μm emitting quantum cascade lasers grown by MOCVD: Performance improvement obtained through AlInAs composition adjustment. Optics Communications, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2024.131296
2. Zhang, S., Zhu, L., Li, M. et al. Phase-locked taper array for mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers with Talbot cavities. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2024. doi:10.1117/12.3032520
3. Guo, Q., Zhang, J., Cheng, F. et al. Anti-symmetric sampled grating quantum cascade laser for mode selection. Chinese Physics B, 2023, 32(3): 034209. doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ac7291
4. Nestor, J., Boyko, I., Kinakh, I. et al. Mathematical Model of the Electronic Schemes for Nitride AlN/GaN Nanotubes. Proceedings - International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies, ACIT, 2021. doi:10.1109/ACIT52158.2021.9548586
5. Wu, H., Yin, X., Dong, L. et al. Ppb-level nitric oxide photoacoustic sensor based on a mid-IR quantum cascade laser operating at 52 °C. Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2019.04.007
6. Sweeney, S.J., Eales, T.D., Marko, I.P. The physics of mid-infrared semiconductor materials and heterostructures. Mid-infrared Optoelectronics: Materials, Devices, and Applications, 2019. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102709-7.00001-2
7. Yu, T., Liu, S., Zhang, J. et al. InAs-based interband cascade lasers at 4.0 μm operating at room temperature. Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(11): 114003. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/39/11/114003
8. Zhao, Y., Zhang, J.-C., Cheng, F.-M. et al. Tapered Quantum Cascade Laser Arrays Integrated with Talbot Cavities. Nanoscale Research Letters, 2018. doi:10.1186/s11671-018-2617-z
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Chuncai Hou, Yue Zhao, Jinchuan Zhang, Shenqiang Zhai, Ning Zhuo, Junqi Liu, Lijun Wang, Shuman Liu, Fengqi Liu, Zhanguo Wang. Room temperature continuous wave operation of quantum cascade laser at λ ~ 9.4 μm[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(3): 034001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/3/034001
    C C Hou, Y Zhao, J C Zhang, S Q Zhai, N Zhuo, J Q Liu, L J Wang, S M Liu, F Q Liu, Z G Wang. Room temperature continuous wave operation of quantum cascade laser at λ ~ 9.4 μm[J]. J. Semicond., 2018, 39(3): 034001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/3/034001.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 4057 Times PDF downloads: 78 Times Cited by: 8 Times

    History

    Received: 20 July 2017 Revised: 25 August 2017 Online: Uncorrected proof: 24 January 2018Published: 01 March 2018

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Chuncai Hou, Yue Zhao, Jinchuan Zhang, Shenqiang Zhai, Ning Zhuo, Junqi Liu, Lijun Wang, Shuman Liu, Fengqi Liu, Zhanguo Wang. Room temperature continuous wave operation of quantum cascade laser at λ ~ 9.4 μm[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(3): 034001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/3/034001 ****C C Hou, Y Zhao, J C Zhang, S Q Zhai, N Zhuo, J Q Liu, L J Wang, S M Liu, F Q Liu, Z G Wang. Room temperature continuous wave operation of quantum cascade laser at λ ~ 9.4 μm[J]. J. Semicond., 2018, 39(3): 034001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/3/034001.
      Citation:
      Chuncai Hou, Yue Zhao, Jinchuan Zhang, Shenqiang Zhai, Ning Zhuo, Junqi Liu, Lijun Wang, Shuman Liu, Fengqi Liu, Zhanguo Wang. Room temperature continuous wave operation of quantum cascade laser at λ ~ 9.4 μm[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(3): 034001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/3/034001 ****
      C C Hou, Y Zhao, J C Zhang, S Q Zhai, N Zhuo, J Q Liu, L J Wang, S M Liu, F Q Liu, Z G Wang. Room temperature continuous wave operation of quantum cascade laser at λ ~ 9.4 μm[J]. J. Semicond., 2018, 39(3): 034001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/3/034001.

      Room temperature continuous wave operation of quantum cascade laser at λ ~ 9.4 μm

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/3/034001
      Funds:

      Project supported by the National Key Research And Development Program (No. 2016YFB0402303), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61435014, 61627822, 61574136, 61774146, 61674144, 61404131), the Key Projects of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Nos. ZDRW-XH-2016-4, QYZDJ-SSW-JSC027), and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 4162060, 4172060).

      More Information

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return