J. Semicond. > 2018, Volume 39 > Issue 9 > 094004

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES

Theoretical simulation of T2SLs InAs/GaSb cascade photodetector for HOT condition

Tetiana Manyk, Klaudia Hackiewicz, Jaroslaw Rutkowski and Piotr Martyniuk

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Tetiana Manyk, tetjana.manyk@wat.edu.pl

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/094004

PDF

Turn off MathJax

Abstract: The investigation of the interband type-II superlattice InAs/GaSb cascade photodetector in the temperature range of 320–380 K is presented. The article is devoted to the theoretical modeling of the cascade detector characteristics by the use of the SimuApsys platform and the 4-band model (kp 8 × 8 method). The obtained theoretical characteristics are comparable with experimentally measured ones, suggesting that transport in the absorber is determined by the dynamics of intrinsic carriers and by their lifetime. An overlap equal to 120 meV was used in calculations and a correction term in the " non-common atom” model Hxy = 700 meV was added to the Hamiltonian. The electron and hole effective masses from dispersion curves were estimated and absorption coefficient α was calculated. Based on the simulation detectivity, D* characteristics in the temperature range 320–380 K were calculated. The simulated theoretical characteristics at 320 K are comparable to experimentally measured ones, however at higher temperatures, the experimental value of D* does not reach the theoretical values due to the low resistance of the device and short diffusion length.

Key words: interband cascade photodetectorstype-II superlatticeinfrared detectors

The study of the infrared radiation (IR) spectral range is of great practical and scientific importance. The set of tasks that will be produced with the development of humanity, will require the constant expansion of the number of used materials, an improvement of their parameters, and also the theoretical justification of the properties that have been covered[1]. AIIIBV semiconductors are, on this day, promising materials for the IR region. Smith and Mailhiot in 1987 proposed the use of type-II superlattices (T2SLs) InAs/GaSb with excellent electro-optical properties, theoretically being comparable with HgCdTe[2]. Recently, the considerable progress towards III–V antimonide-based low dimensional solids development and device design innovations has been presented[3].

In T2SLs the minimum level of the conduction band in InAs is below the maximum of the valence band of GaSb. That band arrangement called the type-II “broken gap” makes it possible to adjust the effective separation between the lowest conduction band C1 and the highest valence band VH1 in the scientifically important 2–10 μm range wavelength by changing the thickness of the InAs and GaSb layers. This tuning of the band gap made the above system technologically interesting for IR lasers and detectors.

The simulated T2SLs InAs/GaSb interband cascade infrared detectors (IB CID) consist of an n-type contact layer grown on the GaSb substrate, active layer, and upper contact layer made of a beryllium doped GaSb. The active layer consists of seven cascades, in which the absorber regions are connected by the AlSb tunnel barrier. The individual absorber region, in turn, consists of 28 periods of 9 mono layers (ML) InAs and 9 ML GaSb (net thickness, d = 153 nm). The total thickness of the absorber is 1.07 µm. The responsivity is low compared to the values for conventional p-i-n junction photodiodes. This is partly explained by a thin individual absorber[4]. The high temperature range was assumed in calculation, i.e. T = 320–380 K.

The detectivity characteristic D* of the IB CID T2SLs InAs/GaSb can be estimated using a theoretical model proposed by Hinkey and Yang[5]. In this paper we assume that the surface recombination rate is zero. For a multistage detector with the identical Ns number of stages, where the ambipolar diffusion length L is constant at each stage, the expression for D* is given by:

D=λhcNsη2gthLtanh(dL)exp(αd(Ns1)),
(1)

where: η, gth, d, c, h, λ, and α are the quantum efficiency one stage, the carrier generation rate per unit volume, the thickness of the absorber in one stage, the speed of light, the Planck constant, the wavelength, and the absorption coefficient, respectively. The increase in the number of stages reduces shot noise and also reduces the overall signal current, due to the attenuation of light at deeper levels. If the detector is illuminated from the side of the carrier collection point, the quantum efficiency η is defined as:

η=[αL1(αL)2]{sinh(dL)+αLeαdαLcosh(dL)cosh(dL)}.
(2)

An absorber is non-intentionally doped, so in high temperature it carrier concentration is comparable to the intrinsic concentration. Therefore, the gth parameter can be described by gth=2np(n+p)τ , where n, p are electrons and holes concentrations, and τ is their lifetime, respectively. The carrier lifetime, required in our subsequent simulations, was estimated to the comparison of the theoretical and experimental current voltage (I–U) characteristics of T2SLs cascade detectors. The average bulk electron current that flows through the device is given by Ref. [5]:

Ib(U)=2eniLτ1Nsi=1N1S×sinh(d/L)cosh(d/L)×[exp(eUβNskBT)1],
(3)

where e, ni, kB, and β are elementary electric charge, intrinsic carrier concentration, the Boltzmann constant, and diode ideality factor, respectively. Parameter β is estimated experimentally and is equal to 2. The correct fit of the theoretical I–U characteristics to the experimental values allows us to determine the carrier lifetime τ. The correct estimation of τ was defined in our earlier work[6].

The determination for the carrier concentration ni written by:

ni=2(2πkBh2)(memh)0.75T1.5exp(Eg2kBT),
(4)

requires knowledge of the energy gap Eg and the effective electrons and holes masses me , mh , respectively.

The estimation of the electrons me and holes mh masses was calculated using the following equation:

me,h=[(me,h||)2me,h]13,
(5)

where me|| , me , mh|| , mh are the effective masses of the electrons and holes in the plane and in the growth direction.

The electron band structures and optical properties of T2SLs were modeled using the SimuApsys platform. One of the main difficulties in modeling a narrow-gap superlattice is the determination of the band alignment and the valence band offset (VBO). Schematic of the band alignment diagram along the growth direction for InAs/GaSb heterostructure is shown in Fig. 1. The displacement of the valence band, in turn, is associated with overlapping of bandΔ.

Figure  1.  (Color online) Schematic of the band alignment for T2SLs InAs / GaSb, where CBO is conduction band offset.

There are various methods as well as various groups of researchers representing very different experimentally obtained values of the displacement of the valence band at this time. In addition to experimental discrepancy the main reason is the imperfection of the heterojunction formed in practice. Interphase layers are unintentionally formed at the heterojunction, which affect the VBO measurements and other optical properties. In this article, the VBO value was determined by the choice of the overlap band so that the energy bandgap determined from the simulation is consistent with the long-wave optical cut-off.

In order to study dispersion curves (E–k) a 4-band model (kp 8 × 8 method) for simulation was implemented. The periodic boundary conditions impose periodicity on the wave functions. In our case, the left and right meshes (SimuApsys semantic) were chosen to be half the width of the GaSb layer. The effect of the “non-common atom” (NCA) at the quantum well boundary was also implemented[6]. As shown in Ref. [7], the value of Hxy = 700 meV was used for calculations of the E–k curves. The parameters presented in Table 1 were implemented to simulate the IB CID T2SLs InAs/GaSb active layer[8, 9].

Table  1.  Band structure parameters for the InAs and GaSb.
Parameter Symbol Material
InAs GaSb
Lattice constant A = a0 + α(T – 300) a (Å) 6.0583 + 2.74 × 10−5 × (T − 300) 6.0959 + 4.72 × 10−5 × (T − 300)
Band gap Eg = Eg0 α 0T2/(T + β0) α 0 (eV/K) 0.276 × 10−3 0.417 × 10−3
β0 (K) 93 140
Eg0 (eV) 0.417 0.812
Luttinger parameters γ1 19.481 16.291
γ2 8.428 6.305
γ3 9.171 7.371
Deformation potential ac (eV) −5.08 −7.5
av (eV) −1.00 −0.8
b (eV) −1.8 −2
Elastic constant C11 (GPa) 83.29 88.42
C12 (GPa) 45.26 40.26
C44 (GPa) 39.59 43.22
Spin orbit energy ΔSO (eV) 0.39 0.76
Effective mass me/m0 0.028 0.035
Kane potential Ep (eV) 14.427 15.726
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

The theoretical calculations were compared with the experimental characteristics IB CID fabricated by The Center for High-Tech Materials (University of New Mexico, Albuquerque). The technological growth procedure for the IB CID T2SLs InAs/GaSb is described in more detail by Gautam et al.[10].

An example of the calculated energy dispersion for directions in the plane of the Brillouin zone and perpendicular (growth) at the investigated temperatures is shown in Fig. 2. The subbands VH1, VH2, and VL1 which are shown in this figure, are responsible for the positions of the heavy and light holes. The horizontal wave vector k|| is normalized to 2/a, where a = 6.100 Å is the lattice constant for GaSb, whereas the perpendicular wave vector k is normalized to π/L, where L = 5.469 nm is the periodicity of T2SLs.

Figure  2.  (Color online) The dispersion relation of the simulated T2SLs 9MLs (InAs) / 9MLs (GaSb) for two directions in the Brillouin zone at T = 380 K.

The values of the position of the valence bands, VBO, and the energy gap Eg at temperatures of 320, 340, and 380 K obtained in the vicinity of the Γ-point are given in Table 2.

Table  2.  Calculated band gap parameters of T2SLs InAs/GaSb.
Temperatures (K) VH1 (eV) VH2 (eV) VL1 (eV) VL2 (eV) VH3 (eV) VH4 (eV) Eg (eV) VBO (eV)
320 0.459 0.362 0.308 0.287 0.191 0.119 0.2 0.469
340 0.455 0.357 0.303 0.284 0.187 0.114 0.1935 0.463
380 0.447 0.347 0.294 0.276 0.179 0.106 0.1836 0.453
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

Calculated theoretical energy gaps Eg are comparable to the optical band gaps estimated from the spectral characteristics of long-wave cut-off. The selected values of the displacement of the valence band correspond to the values indicated in the Refs. [11, 12].

The effective masses were calculated from the dispersion curves as the second derivative of energy by the wave vector:

m=2(d2Edk2)1,
(6)

where m* is the effective mass, k is the wave vector, and ћ is the reduced Planck constant. For example, at T = 380 K the calculated effective masses of electrons and holes are me|| = 0.038m0, me = 1.514m0, mh|| = 0.121m0, mh = 5.046 m0. Fig. 3 shows the theoretically calculated absorption coefficients by the SimuApsys platform for temperatures 320, 340, and 380 K.

Figure  3.  (Color online) Absorption coefficient calculated by SimuApsys.

The one value of the overlap energy equal to Δ = 0.120 eV is chosen for all temperatures. The maximum value of the absorption coefficient α is at 380 K. The α decreases with decreasing photon energy E. The absorption spectrum shows maxima in the regions 0.36, 0.3, and 0.2 eV. These peaks can be explained by the appearance of bands in the superlattice. With decreasing temperature, the value of the absorption coefficient α decreases and the value of distances between bands (including Eg) increases. For further calculation of Johnson noise-limited detectivity D* an average value of absorption coefficient was used.

As noted at the beginning, the comparison theoretically calculated and experimentally measured D* versus wavelength was the main aim of this paper. In order to perform this comparison the first IU characteristics were analyzed. Fig. 4 shows theoretically calculated and experimentally measured I–U characteristics for temperature range T = 320–380 K. As can be seen the proper fitting of the theoretically calculated and experimentally measured data for the lifetime τ equal ~ 80 ns were reached. At temperature 380 K for reverse bias voltage higher than 0.4 V the measured dark current is higher than the calculated one. Thus, even at high temperatures there could be additional leakage current channels, which lead to higher dark current levels. This increase in the dark current can also be related to the heating of the detector at a high reverse bias voltage.

Figure  4.  (Color online) Experimental and theoretical IU characteristics at high temperatures: T = 320, 340, and 380 K.

The theoretically calculated and experimentally measured D* are shown in Fig. 5 for three temperatures T = 320, 340, and 380 K. As can be seen, experimental results do not vary significantly from the calculated theoretical values at 320 K. For higher temperatures, the measured D* is lower than theoretical Johnson noise-limited detectivity. For example at temperature 380 K and at wavelength ≈ 5 μm, the theoretical Johnson noise-limited detectivity is 3 × 108 cmHz1/2W−1 and it is three times higher than the measured one. At higher temperature, the difference between the calculated and measured results is connected with the accuracy of determining the D* measurements. The value of measured Johnson noise-limited detectivity is proportional to quantum efficiency and the square root of dynamic resistance under zero bias. At high temperatures, due to the fact that detectors resistance at zero-bias R0 is relatively low (R0 < 60 Ω), the series resistance ( Rs = 30–40 Ω) could have a significant impact on the accuracy of extracted intrinsic photocurrent. The high series resistance will be connected with the decreasing of the measured quantum efficiency. Since the Johnson noise share is the dominant source at high temperature when the detector operates under zero-bias, the high series resistance increases this noise and decreases measured detectivity.

Figure  5.  (Color online) Experimental and theoretical Johnson noise limited detectivity.

The performance of the device can further be improved by the doping optimization in the absorber and barrier regions. It is necessary to study the quantum properties of cascades, the physics of their design and material properties for reaching the best performance of the T2SLs HOT detectors. Lei et al. have shown that one way to improve the detectivity value of detectors at high temperatures is to increase the number of stages[13].

The IB CID T2SLs InAs/GaSb in the temperature range of 320–380 K was investigated. The proper fitting of theoretically calculated and experimentally measured spectral characteristics were shown, assuming that the transport in the absorber was determined by the dynamics of almost intrinsic carriers and carrier lifetime. In addition, the overlap value about 120 meV equal for all investigated temperatures was estimated. The possibility to improve the detection parameters of these detectors at higher temperatures, relative to room one, was shown.



[1]
Sudha M, Chennupati J. III–V compound SC for optoelectronic devices. Mater Today, 2009, 12(4): 22 doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(09)70110-5
[2]
Smith D L, Mailhiot C. Proposal for strained type II superlattice infrared detectors. J Appl Phys, 1987, 62(6): 2545 doi: 10.1063/1.339468
[3]
Rogalski A, Kopytko M, Martyniuk P. InAs/GaSb type-II superlattice infrared detectors: three decades of development. Proc SPIE, 2017: 1017715
[4]
Tian Z, Hinkey R T, Yang R Q, et al. Interband cascade infrared photodetectors with enhanced electron barriers and p-type superlattice absorbers. J Appl Phys, 2012, 111(2): 024510 doi: 10.1063/1.3678003
[5]
Hinkey R T, Yang R Q. Theory of multiple-stage interband photovoltaic devices and ultimate performance limit comparison of multiple-stage and single-stage interband infrared detectors. J Appl Phys, 2013, 114(10): 104506 doi: 10.1063/1.4820394
[6]
Hackiewicz K, Martyniuk P, Rutkowski J, et al. Dark current simulation in interband cascade photodetectors operating in room temperature. Proc SPIE, 2017: 104550
[7]
Lestrade M, Li Z Q, Li Z S. Finite difference k∙p modeling of type II MQWs. Opt Quantum Electron, 2014, 46(10): 1345 doi: 10.1007/s11082-014-9881-7
[8]
Vurgaftman I, Meyer J R, Ram-Mohan L R. Band parameters for III–V compound semiconductors and their alloys. J Appl Phys, 2001, 89(11): 5815 doi: 10.1063/1.1368156
[9]
Karazhanov S Z. Ab initio studies of the band parameters of III–V and II–VI zinc-blende semiconductors. Semiconductors, 2005, 39(2): 161 doi: 10.1134/1.1864192
[10]
Gautam N, Myers S, Barve A V, et al. High operating temperature interband cascade midwave infrared detector based on type-II InAs/GaSb strained layer superlattice. Appl Phys Lett, 2012, 101(2): 021106 doi: 10.1063/1.4733660
[11]
Livneh Y, Klipstein P C, Klin O, et al. k∙p model for the energy dispersions and absorption spectra of InAs/GaSb type-II superlattices. Phys Rev B, 2012, 86: 235311 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.235311
[12]
Qiao P F, Mou S, Chuang S L. Electronic band structures and optical properties of type-II superlattice photodetectors with interfacial effect. Opt Express, 2012, 20(3): 2319 doi: 10.1364/OE.20.002319
[13]
Lei L, Li L, Ye H, et al. Long wavelength interband cascade infrared photodetectors operating at high temperatures. J Appl Phys, 2016, 120(19): 193102 doi: 10.1063/1.4967915
Fig. 1.  (Color online) Schematic of the band alignment for T2SLs InAs / GaSb, where CBO is conduction band offset.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) The dispersion relation of the simulated T2SLs 9MLs (InAs) / 9MLs (GaSb) for two directions in the Brillouin zone at T = 380 K.

Fig. 3.  (Color online) Absorption coefficient calculated by SimuApsys.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) Experimental and theoretical IU characteristics at high temperatures: T = 320, 340, and 380 K.

Fig. 5.  (Color online) Experimental and theoretical Johnson noise limited detectivity.

Table 1.   Band structure parameters for the InAs and GaSb.

Parameter Symbol Material
InAs GaSb
Lattice constant A = a0 + α (T – 300) a (Å) 6.0583 + 2.74 × 10−5 × (T − 300) 6.0959 + 4.72 × 10−5 × (T − 300)
Band gap Eg = Eg0 α 0T2/(T + β0) α 0 (eV/K) 0.276 × 10−3 0.417 × 10−3
β0 (K) 93 140
Eg0 (eV) 0.417 0.812
Luttinger parameters γ1 19.481 16.291
γ2 8.428 6.305
γ3 9.171 7.371
Deformation potential ac (eV) −5.08 −7.5
av (eV) −1.00 −0.8
b (eV) −1.8 −2
Elastic constant C11 (GPa) 83.29 88.42
C12 (GPa) 45.26 40.26
C44 (GPa) 39.59 43.22
Spin orbit energy ΔSO (eV) 0.39 0.76
Effective mass me/m0 0.028 0.035
Kane potential Ep (eV) 14.427 15.726
DownLoad: CSV

Table 2.   Calculated band gap parameters of T2SLs InAs/GaSb.

Temperatures (K) VH1 (eV) VH2 (eV) VL1 (eV) VL2 (eV) VH3 (eV) VH4 (eV) Eg (eV) VBO (eV)
320 0.459 0.362 0.308 0.287 0.191 0.119 0.2 0.469
340 0.455 0.357 0.303 0.284 0.187 0.114 0.1935 0.463
380 0.447 0.347 0.294 0.276 0.179 0.106 0.1836 0.453
DownLoad: CSV
[1]
Sudha M, Chennupati J. III–V compound SC for optoelectronic devices. Mater Today, 2009, 12(4): 22 doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(09)70110-5
[2]
Smith D L, Mailhiot C. Proposal for strained type II superlattice infrared detectors. J Appl Phys, 1987, 62(6): 2545 doi: 10.1063/1.339468
[3]
Rogalski A, Kopytko M, Martyniuk P. InAs/GaSb type-II superlattice infrared detectors: three decades of development. Proc SPIE, 2017: 1017715
[4]
Tian Z, Hinkey R T, Yang R Q, et al. Interband cascade infrared photodetectors with enhanced electron barriers and p-type superlattice absorbers. J Appl Phys, 2012, 111(2): 024510 doi: 10.1063/1.3678003
[5]
Hinkey R T, Yang R Q. Theory of multiple-stage interband photovoltaic devices and ultimate performance limit comparison of multiple-stage and single-stage interband infrared detectors. J Appl Phys, 2013, 114(10): 104506 doi: 10.1063/1.4820394
[6]
Hackiewicz K, Martyniuk P, Rutkowski J, et al. Dark current simulation in interband cascade photodetectors operating in room temperature. Proc SPIE, 2017: 104550
[7]
Lestrade M, Li Z Q, Li Z S. Finite difference k∙p modeling of type II MQWs. Opt Quantum Electron, 2014, 46(10): 1345 doi: 10.1007/s11082-014-9881-7
[8]
Vurgaftman I, Meyer J R, Ram-Mohan L R. Band parameters for III–V compound semiconductors and their alloys. J Appl Phys, 2001, 89(11): 5815 doi: 10.1063/1.1368156
[9]
Karazhanov S Z. Ab initio studies of the band parameters of III–V and II–VI zinc-blende semiconductors. Semiconductors, 2005, 39(2): 161 doi: 10.1134/1.1864192
[10]
Gautam N, Myers S, Barve A V, et al. High operating temperature interband cascade midwave infrared detector based on type-II InAs/GaSb strained layer superlattice. Appl Phys Lett, 2012, 101(2): 021106 doi: 10.1063/1.4733660
[11]
Livneh Y, Klipstein P C, Klin O, et al. k∙p model for the energy dispersions and absorption spectra of InAs/GaSb type-II superlattices. Phys Rev B, 2012, 86: 235311 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.235311
[12]
Qiao P F, Mou S, Chuang S L. Electronic band structures and optical properties of type-II superlattice photodetectors with interfacial effect. Opt Express, 2012, 20(3): 2319 doi: 10.1364/OE.20.002319
[13]
Lei L, Li L, Ye H, et al. Long wavelength interband cascade infrared photodetectors operating at high temperatures. J Appl Phys, 2016, 120(19): 193102 doi: 10.1063/1.4967915
1

Thermoelectric infrared detectors: Design, fabrication, and performance assessment

Daryoosh Vashaee

Journal of Semiconductors, 2024, 45(12): 122304. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24060011

2

The measurement of responsivity of infrared photodetectors using a cavity blackbody

Nong Li, Dongwei Jiang, Guowei Wang, Weiqiang Chen, Wenguang Zhou, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(10): 102301. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/10/102301

3

Long wavelength interband cascade photodetector with type II InAs/GaSb superlattice absorber

Shaolong Yan, Jianliang Huang, Ting Xue, Yanhua Zhang, Wenquan Ma, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(4): 042301. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/4/042301

4

Strain-induced the dark current characteristics in InAs/GaSb type-II superlattice for mid-wave detector

H. J. Lee, S. Y. Ko, Y. H. Kim, J. Nah

Journal of Semiconductors, 2020, 41(6): 062302. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/6/062302

5

Improved efficiency and photo-stability of methylamine-free perovskite solar cells via cadmium doping

Yong Chen, Yang Zhao, Qiufeng Ye, Zema Chu, Zhigang Yin, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(12): 122201. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/12/122201

6

Improvement of tunnel compensated quantum well infrared detector

Chaohui Li, Jun Deng, Weiye Sun, Leilei He, Jianjun Li, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(12): 122902. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/12/122902

7

Strain effect on intersubband transitions in rolled-up quantum well infrared photodetectors

Han Wang, Shilong Li, Honglou Zhen, Xiaofei Nie, Gaoshan Huang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(5): 054006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/5/054006

8

Photodetectors based on two dimensional materials

Zheng Lou, Zhongzhu Liang, Guozhen Shen

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(9): 091001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/9/091001

9

N+P photodetector characterization using the quasi-steady state photoconductance decay method

Omeime Xerviar Esebamen

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(12): 123002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/12/123002

10

A simulation of doping and trap effects on the spectral response of AlGaN ultraviolet detectors

Sidi Ould Saad Hamady

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(3): 034002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/3/034002

11

A different approach for determining the responsivity of n+p detectors using scanning electron microscopy

Omeime Xerviar Esebamen, Göran Thungström, Hans-Erik Nilsson

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(7): 074002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/7/074002

12

Fabrication and characterization of an AlGaN/PZT detector

Zhang Yan, Sun Jinglan, Wang Nili, Han Li, Liu Xiangyang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(12): 124015. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/12/124015

13

A monolithic, standard CMOS, fully differential optical receiver with an integrated MSM photodetector

Yu Changliang, Mao Luhong, Xiao Xindong, Xie Sheng, Zhang Shilin, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(10): 105010. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/10/105010

14

Facile fabrication of UV photodetectors based on ZnO nanorod networks across trenched electrodes

Li Yingying, Cheng Chuanwei, Dong Xiang, Gao Junshan, Zhang Haiqian, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(6): 063004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/6/063004

15

Quantum Measurement of Single Electron State by a Mesoscopic Detector

Hu Xuening, Luo Junyan, Li Xinqi

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 218-222.

16

A Low-Power High-Frequency CMOS Peak Detector

Li Xuechu, Gao Qingyun, Qin Shicai

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(10): 1707-1710.

17

9μm Cutoff 128×128 AlGaAs/GaAs Quantum Well Infrared Photodetector Focal Plane Arrays

Li Xianjie, Liu Yingbin, Feng Zhen, Guo Fan, Zhao Yonglin, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(8): 1355-1359.

18

Fabrication of 1.55μm Si-Based Resonant Cavity Enhanced Photodetectors

Mao Rongwei, Zuo Yuhua, Li Chuanbo, Cheng Buwen, Teng Xuegong, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(2): 271-275.

19

Quantum Well Infrared Photodetectors:the Basic Design and New Research Directions

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2001, 22(5): 529-537.

20

Novel Type of Wide-Bandwidth GaAs/AlGaAs Infrared Photodetectors

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2000, 21(7): 630-636.

1. Liu, Z., Zhu, L., Lu, L. et al. Mid-wavelength InAs/GaSb type-II superlattice barrier detector with nBn design and M barrier. Optoelectronics Letters, 2023, 19(10): 577-582. doi:10.1007/s11801-023-3032-y
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Tetiana Manyk, Klaudia Hackiewicz, Jaroslaw Rutkowski, Piotr Martyniuk. Theoretical simulation of T2SLs InAs/GaSb cascade photodetector for HOT condition[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(9): 094004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/094004
    T Manyk, K Hackiewicz, J Rutkowski, P Martyniuk, Theoretical simulation of T2SLs InAs/GaSb cascade photodetector for HOT condition[J]. J. Semicond., 2018, 39(9): 094004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/094004.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 4317 Times PDF downloads: 77 Times Cited by: 1 Times

    History

    Received: 24 January 2018 Revised: 02 March 2018 Online: Uncorrected proof: 17 May 2018Accepted Manuscript: 05 July 2018Published: 01 September 2018

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Tetiana Manyk, Klaudia Hackiewicz, Jaroslaw Rutkowski, Piotr Martyniuk. Theoretical simulation of T2SLs InAs/GaSb cascade photodetector for HOT condition[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(9): 094004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/094004 ****T Manyk, K Hackiewicz, J Rutkowski, P Martyniuk, Theoretical simulation of T2SLs InAs/GaSb cascade photodetector for HOT condition[J]. J. Semicond., 2018, 39(9): 094004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/094004.
      Citation:
      Tetiana Manyk, Klaudia Hackiewicz, Jaroslaw Rutkowski, Piotr Martyniuk. Theoretical simulation of T2SLs InAs/GaSb cascade photodetector for HOT condition[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(9): 094004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/094004 ****
      T Manyk, K Hackiewicz, J Rutkowski, P Martyniuk, Theoretical simulation of T2SLs InAs/GaSb cascade photodetector for HOT condition[J]. J. Semicond., 2018, 39(9): 094004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/094004.

      Theoretical simulation of T2SLs InAs/GaSb cascade photodetector for HOT condition

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/9/094004
      Funds:

      Project supported by the Polish National Science Centre (No. OPUS/UMO-2015/19/B/ST7/02200).

      More Information
      • Corresponding author: tetjana.manyk@wat.edu.pl
      • Received Date: 2018-01-24
      • Revised Date: 2018-03-02
      • Published Date: 2018-09-01

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return