Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2020, Volume 41 > Issue 1 > 011701

REVIEWS

The application of perovskite materials in solar water splitting

Yanbin Huang1, 2, 3, , Jun Liu1, 2, , Yanchun Deng1, 2, 4, Yuanyuan Qian1, 2, 5, Xiaohao Jia1, 2, Mengmeng Ma1, 2, Cheng Yang1, 2, Kong Liu1, 2, Zhijie Wang1, 2, , Shengchun Qu1, 2, and Zhanguo Wang1, 2

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Zhijie Wang, wangzj@semi.ac.cn; Shengchun Qu, qsc@semi.ac.cn.

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/1/011701

PDF

Turn off MathJax

Abstract: Solar water splitting is a promising strategy for sustainable production of renewable hydrogen, and solving the crisis of energy and environment in the world. However, large-scale application of this method is hampered by the efficiency and the expense of the solar water splitting systems. Searching for non-toxic, low-cost, efficient and stable photocatalysts is an important way for solar water splitting. Due to the simplicity of structure and the flexibility of composition, perovskite based photocatalysts have recently attracted widespread attention for application in solar water splitting. In this review, the recent developments of perovskite based photocatalysts for water splitting are summarized. An introduction including the structures and properties of perovskite materials, and the fundamentals of solar water splitting is first provided. Then, it specifically focuses on the strategies for designing and modulating perovskite materials to improve their photocatalytic performance for solar water splitting. The current challenges and perspectives of perovskite materials in solar water splitting are also reviewed. The aim of this review is to summarize recent findings and developments of perovskite based photocatalysts and provide some useful guidance for the future research on the design and development of highly efficient perovskite based photocatalysts and the relevant systems for water splitting.

Key words: solar water splittingperovskite materialsphotocatalyst

Nowadays, the fast-growing energy consumption and increasingly serious environmental pollution are two of the most important issues in the world, so the development of renewable and clean energies is an urgent problem to be solved. As a clean energy, hydrogen gas (H2) is one of the most promising energy carriers to substitute traditional fossil fuels for solving the environmental issues, which is attribute to that H2 has many excellent properties such as twice more gravimetric energy density (120 versus 44 MJ/kg) than that of traditional fossil fuels, transportable and storable nature, renewable energy with zero-carbon emission etc[1]. Moreover, hydrogen can serve as a feed-stock for many catalytic reactions, and can be used for producing liquid fuels by fixing carbon dioxide and nitrogen[2]. Due to the sufficient amount of solar energy and high abundance of water in the earth (nearly 71% of the Earth’s surface is covered by water)[3-5], water splitting using the solar energy has received rapidly increasing attention with regard to the production of renewable hydrogen. However, there are still many obstacles to construct practical, complete and large-scale solar water splitting systems to meet mankind's demand for hydrogen.

Among a variety of solar water splitting technologies, the development and design of semiconductor based photocatalytic or photoelectrocatalytic solar water splitting systems have attracted considerable and growing attention in the past few decades[6, 7]. Based on this, tremendous efforts have been taken to develop active, stable and low-cost photocatalysts, and a lot of efficient photocatalytic materials have been found such as TiO2, ZnO, SnO2, Fe2O3, WO3, and metal-free materials including graphene based photocatalysts, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) based photocatalysts etc[8-17]. However, the solar to hydrogen (STH) efficiency of the reported solar water splitting system is still far below the target efficiency of 10% for large-scale applications[18]. Therefore, to boost the STH conversion efficiency, it is very necessary to develop new photocatalysts or photoelectrochemical (PEC) systems with high activity and wide light absorption capability. Among a large library of photocatalyst materials, perovskite materials based photocatalysts are very attractive among different kinds of materials for construction of high efficient solar water splitting systems, which is attribute to their good stability, high photocatalytic activity, excellent structural flexibility and simplicity, giving them the potential to design and develop high efficient photocatalysts by precisely adjusting and controlling the composition, morphology, band structure of the materials. Specifically, the ideal perovskite usually has a cubic structure and can be represented by a formula of ABX3. The A site can be occupied by alkali metal, alkaline-earth metal and rare-earth metal elements, while B site is usually occupied by transition metal elements, and X site is usually occupied by nonmetal elements (O, N etc.)[4, 19, 20]. The rationally combining or partially substituting different elements at A, B or X sites can form diverse perovskite materials and derivatives, which can also modulate the crystal or electronic structures and the related physical and chemical properties of the perovskite materials, offering great potential to regulate the photocatalytic performance of the perovskite based photocatalysts[1, 4, 21, 22]. Thus, developing and designing perovskite based photocatalysts are ideal routes to enhance the STH efficiency of the solar water splitting system, and would finally solve the energy and environmental crisis of the world.

In this paper, the recent developments of perovskite photocatalysts for solar water splitting are comprehensively reviewed. It will focus on the designing and modulating of different perovskite materials to enhance their light absorption capability and the photocatalytic activity for water splitting. The aim of this review is to summarize recent findings and progress on perovskite based photocatalysts and provide some useful guidance for the future research on the design and development of highly efficient perovskite based photocatalysts and systems for solar water splitting. Based on this, the paper is composed of five sections. Section 1 briefly introduces the relationship between hydrogen energy and the crisis of energy and environment in the world and the perovskite materials. In Section 2, the structures and properties of perovskite materials are presented. In Section 3 the fundamentals of solar water splitting including photocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis are discussed. In Section 4, the recent developments and strategies regarding the design of perovskite catalysts for photocatalytic reactions, including modification of the chemical component, crystal structure and morphology engineering, application of ferroelectric property, construction of heterojunction structure, and construction of plasmonic-based photocatalysts, are comprehensively reviewed. Finally, in Section 5, the current challenges and perspectives for the future research in developing of perovskite based photocatalysts for water splitting are discussed.

Perovskite materials generally have a same crystal structure as calcium titanate (CaTiO3), which is initially discovered by the Russian mineralogist Lev Perovski. Later, the “perovskite” is used to represent for a family of materials that have the same type of crystalline unit cell as CaTiO3[23]. Generally, the chemical composition of perovskite materials can be denoted by a formula of ABX3, where A and B represent two cations with different sizes, and X is an anion (O2–, I, Br, Cl, etc.) that forms bonds with two cations. The ideal ABX3 perovskite-type structure is cubic symmetry that has a space group of Pm3m-Oh. As shown in Fig. 1, the smaller cation B and anion X can form a BX6 octahedral structure, where B is located at the center and surrounded by the anion X lie in the corners of octahedra. In this structure, the lager cation A is usually 12-fold cuboctahedral coordinated and the cation B is 6-fold coordinated with the surrounding X anions[21, 24, 25].

Figure  1.  (Color online) (a) Schematic structure of cubic ABX3 perovskite unit cell, and (b) the extended tridimensional structure of perovskites formed by the corner-linked octahedral.

As for the perovskite materials, the cations occupying in the A and B site can affect the properties of the materials. More than 90% of metal elements in the periodic table can be stably located in the perovskite lattice, and many kinds of compositions and constituent elements essentially can not change the basic structure. In the ideal cubic symmetry structure, the ionic radii keep the following relationship: rA + rX = 2(rB + rX), where rA, rB and rX are the ionic radii of elements in A, B and X-site, respectively. However, it is found that the cubic structure is still retained in the perovskite materials even if the actual relationship is not identical to the above[6, 21]. To construct a criterion for the formation of the perovskite structure, Goldschmidt firstly introduced a tolerance factor (t), which is widely accepted and defined by the following equation: t = (rA + rX)/2(rB + rX)[21, 26, 27]. Although it is generally accepted that the cubic perovskites can be stabilized when the t lies in a range of 0.76 < t < 1.13, Wu et al. found that the perovskite structures are not stable, even t ranges between 0.8 and 0.9[28]. To further reveal the formation criterion of perovskite structures, the octahedral factor (μ) was then proposed, where μ = rB/rX. The formability and stability of the alkali metal halide perovskite can be determined by combining with the above two factors (t and μ)[29]. So the radii of elements play an important role for the structure of perovskites. For the ABX3 perovskite, the different types and valence states of cations can cause the variation of its radii, which can result in the lattice distortion and the transformation of crystal phases. These variations have a direct impact on the crystal field of perovskites and can cause the variations of the dipole and electronic band structures, which are important for the photocatalytic properties of the materials, as they can influence the excitation, transfer, and redox reaction of the photogenerated charge carriers during the photocatalytic process[24, 30, 31].

The rich compositions and constituent elements of perovskite materials gives rise to the great flexiblility of their electronic structures and band structures, which in turn makes the perovskites a wide variety of diverse physical and chemical properties, such as fine ferroelectricity, superconductivity, colossal magneto resistance, perfect oxygen ion diffusion property, lithium mobility and high catalytic performance (including oxidation of small molecules such as CO and hydrocarbons, photo(electro)chemical splitting of water, and reduction of CO2 and O2[4, 23, 32-42]. Above all, the flexibility of the electronic and crystal structure provides an opportunity for the design of multifunctional and high-performance perovskite photocatalytic materials. Through careful and scientific designing of perovskite materials, the electronic structure, band structure, adsorption properties, crystal structure and crystallite size can be tuned to improve selectivity and stability of catalysis, minimize electrochemical and chemical barriers of different catalytic reactions, and enhance the light absorption capability of the photocatalysts.

As a potential candidate for the storage and conversion of solar energy, the photo(electro)catalytic water splitting into hydrogen and oxygen has been regarded as one of the most important methods for the future energy crisis. Since the solar water splitting was firstly discovered by Honda and Fujishima in 1972, which showed that the solar water splitting can be occurred when using single-crystalline TiO2 as a photoanode under UV light irradiation and Pt as a cathode with an external bias[43]. To date, a large number of good achievements have been made in the field. Moreover, the basic principles of solar water splitting had been presented in many reviews[7, 44-49]. Generally, semiconductor compounds are in different phase with the reactants during the photocatalytic reactions, so they are usually used as heterogeneous photocatalysts and the basic reaction mechanism is shown in Fig. 2(a). When the energy of incident light is larger than the band gap (Eg) of the material, the electrons in the valence band (VB) can be excited to the conduction band (CB) of the heterogeneous photocatalyst, leading to the separation of electrons and holes. The separated electrons and holes can directly react with the water molecules that absorbed in the surface active sites of the photocatalyst and cause H2 and O2 production[44].

Figure  2.  (Color online) Schematic illustration of the basic reaction mechanism of the overall water splitting on a semiconductor (a), and uphill reaction process of photocatalytic water splitting (b). Reprinted from Ref. [44].

As shown in Fig. 2(b), the solar water-splitting is an uphill and nonspontaneous reaction because the Gibbs free energy is positive change about 237.3 kJ/mol under standard temperature and pressure[44, 50]. For facilitating the water splitting reaction, the band gap and the potential of the CB edge and the VB of the semiconductor photocatalysts are the key points. The potential of the bottom edge of the CB has to be lower than the redox potential of H+/H2 (0 V versus normal hydrogen electrode (NHE)), while the potential of the top edge of the VB has to be higher than the redox potential O2/H2O (+1.23 V versus NHE). Accordingly, the minimum band gap to drive water splitting reaction is 1.23 eV that corresponds to a wavelength of about 1000 nm (λ = 1240/Eg). From the thermodynamic theory, this potential distribution of the photocatalyst with the minimum band gap of 1.23 eV and appropriate band position is necessary and sufficient for solar water splitting. However, the water reduction and oxidation processes are two-electron and four-electron process, respectively. These reaction processes are multi-step reactions and there is activation barrier between the photocatalyst and water molecules during the charge-transfer process. Therefore, there usually be a high over-voltage in the process of water oxidation and reduction and the energy of the incident photons must greater than the bandgap of photocatalyst, so the minimum band gap of 1.23 eV is not sufficient for driving the whole water splitting, and the practical value is in the range of 1.6–2.4 eV[27, 44, 46, 51].

There are mainly two ways for solar water splitting: the one is using powdered photocatalyst for water splitting and another is PEC method that using photoelectrodes. The basic feature of photocatalytic water splitting using a powdered photocatalyst is shown in Fig. 2(b). The pulverized photocatalyst is well dispersed in a water pool and exposed to sunlight, and then the generated gas from water splitting can be readily got. For the simplicity of powdered photocatalyst system, it is advantageous for large-scale application. However, the dependence on using sacrificial agent for the half-reaction and the difficulty for separation hydrogen and oxygen from the resulting gas mixture are the main challenge of this method. Thus, it is important to develop efficient photocatalyst and design optimized system for practical application of solar water splitting by powdered photocatalyst. In addition, lots of PEC cells have also been developed for solar water splitting[4, 7, 9, 52, 53]. The first PEC cell used for water splitting was reported by Honda and Fujishima in 1972[43]. As shown in Fig. 3, electrons and holes are generated on a TiO2 electrode while it is irradiated by UV light. Then the photogenerated holes on the TiO2 electrode can oxidize water to form O2 while the electrons can be separated from the holes and transferred to the Pt counter electrode under a certain external bias with a power supply to reduce water to form H2. Another representative study was done by Anpo’s group who succeeded in the separation of the generated hydrogen and oxygen with a TiO2 thin-film photocatalyst compounding with a Pt counter electrode, and the two sides of the compound photoelectrode are in different electrolytes and enclosed with a two-compartment cell[54]. However, the key problem of solar water splitting by PEC cell is the lack of suitable photoelectrode materials with appropriate band structure and high stability.

Figure  3.  (Color online) (a) Schematic illustration of water splitting using a TiO2 photoelectrode. Reprinted from Ref. [44]. (b) H-type glass container for the separate evolution of H2 and O2 using a TiO2 thin film photocatalyst device (TiO2 side, 1.0 M NaOH aqueous solutions; Pt side, 0.5 M H2SO4 aqueous solution). Reprinted from Ref. [54].

According to the previous researches[27, 44, 49], the photocatalytic reaction is usually composed of three basic processes. As shown in Fig. 4, the first step is the absorption of effective photons whose energy (hv) is equal or larger than the band gap of photocatalysts, leading to the generation of photoexcited electron-hole pairs in the bulk of them. In this step, a large number of photogenerated carriers are required for a photocatalyst. However, due to the wide band gap, most of semiconductor photocatalyst materials can only respond to UV light which is only of five percent of the total energy of sunlight. The main component of the solar spectrum (approximately 95%) is composed of visible light (approximately 50%) and infrared light (approximately 45%)[47]. Therefore, a primary goal of the solar water splitting is to develop photocatalysts with efficient visible light response by suitable band engineering. The second step is the separation photogenerated electron-hole pairs and the migration charge carriers. In general, crystal structure, crystallinity and particle size of the photocatalyst have a direct impact on this step. For one thing, the crystallinity affects the density of defects directly. The higher the crystallinity, the less the defect density, which can act as trapping and recombination centers of the photogenerated carriers. For another ting, the large particle size can increase the distance that the separated electrons and holes have to transfer to the catalytic activity sites on the surface of photocatalyst, which can improve the probability of recombination of photocatalytic carriers and reduce the photocatalytic performance of the catalyst[44, 45]. The third step is the process that the photogenerated carriers participate in the surface photocatalytic reactions. The number of active sites and the surface area of photocatalysts are crucial for this step. In order to improve the property of photocatalyst, noble metal or metal oxide is usually loaded onto the photocatalyst and act as cocatalysts to increase the active sites[44, 55]. Thus, further improvements and optimizations of the aforementioned three processes are crucial for enhancing and obtaining high photocatalytic performance for solar water splitting reactions.

Figure  4.  (Color online) Schematic illustration of the main processes of the photocatalytic overall water splitting reaction.

To design a photocatalyst with excellent performance, the generation, migration and reaction of the photogenerated charge carriers, which are three major steps during the whole process of photocatalytic reaction, must be considered. Perovskite can be used as a new category of ideal photocatalyst for solar water splitting because it has many advantageous properties different from other conventional photocatalytic materials. Firstly, some of perovskites have suitable band structure that are favorable for either half reaction or the overall water splitting. Secondly, the flexible compositions and constituent elements of perovskite materials in A site or B site offer its adjustable electronic structure and the according band structure. Last but not least, some of perovskites have ferroelectric and/or piezoelectric properties which can further enhance their photocatalytic abilities for water splitting[56-58]. However, the large band gap of most perovskite materials impedes them used as high efficient photocatalysts, because it’s hard for them to utilize the visible and infrared light of solar spectrum which is the main part of sunlight and contains almost 95% of the whole solar energy. Different strategies have been developed to optimize the three key processes (generation of photoexcited electron-hole pairs, the separation of electron-hole pairs and the migration of charge carriers, and the surface photocatalytic reactions initiated by photogenerated carriers) of photocatalytic reaction that use perovskite materials as photocatalysts for water splitting. In this review, we will focus on five key strategies: (1) modification of the chemical component, (2) crystal structure and morphology engineering, (3) application of ferroelectric property, (4) construction of heterojunction structure, and (5) construction of plasmonic-based photocatalysts.

As the electronic band structures of perovskite materials are directly related to their chemical component, the strategy to modify the chemical component is mainly for the purpose of adjusting the electronic structures and enhancing the solar light response of the photocatalytic materials. The electronic band structures of a perovskite photocatalyst can be designed and modified by doping of foreign element. Generally, the CB of most perovskite materials is mainly consisted of d0 transition metal orbits and the bottom edge of CB is much lower than the redox potential of H+/H2 (0 V vs. NHE). The VB is mainly consisted of O2p atomic obits and the top edge of the VB energy levels is much higher than the redox potential of H2O/O2. The large band gap can be altered in two main ways: introducing new mid-gap state between the VB and CB through modifying the chemical component of perovskite material, and altering the VB or CB position of perovskite material through the mixing of energy levels of the foreign elements and host elements[57, 59, 60]. Therefore, it is an effective way to manipulate the band structure of perovskite material by doping of suitable foreign elements, which can make perovskite material become a visible light response photocatalyst and enhance its photocatalytic activity.

In the past few years, numerous doped perovskite photocatalysts have been explored for potential applications in the field of photocatalysis, and the most common materials for solar water splitting under UV and visible lights are Ti, Ta, and Nb-based perovskite oxides[61]. Take the typical SrTiO3 perovskite as an example, SrTiO3 has a broad band gap of 3.2 eV, which limits it act as a visible light response photocatalyst. However, when it is doped with forigen elements, such as Fe, Rh, Ru, Ir, and Mn, the band gap of the compound material is decreased and it apparently becomes a visible-light responses photocatalyst[62-64]. Akihiko et al. found that the Mn-, Ru-, Rh-, and Ir-doped SrTiO3 can enhance the solar light response range to visible light region, which is due to electronic transition from the discontinuous donor levels formed by the dopants to the CB band of the host SrTiO3. Moreover, the SrTiO3:Rh photocatalyst indicates the highest H2 evolution rate among all the doped photocatalysts due to the doped Rh as a Rh3+ on the B-site which can serves as the visible light absorption center and the surface reaction center. In addition, Cr-doped SrTiO3 is also a promising visible light response photocatalyst for solar water splitting. Due to the formation of a new mid-gap state that lies about 1.0 eV above the top of the valence band, the band gap of SrTiO3 is narrowed to about 2.48 eV[65]. Besides, the band gap energy of perovskite photocatalyst can be manipulated by doping of A-site elements. The modified SrTiO3 and BaTiO3 perovskites were synthesized by Guo et al. among which the A-sites were partially substituted by Zn2+. It was calculated that the top of VBs was mainly consisted of O2p orbitals and the bottom of the CBs was derived from Ti3d and Zn3d. The bottom of CBs is moved down with increasing the Zn content which causes the decrease of band gap of perovskites[66]. Furthermore, some researchers have also studied tantalate and niobate based perovskites by modifying the A-site cations, such as dual doping of A-site for MLnTa2O7 (M = Cs, Na, Rb, H; Ln = Pr, La, Nd, and Sm) and doping of A-site for MIn0.5Nb0.5O3 (M = Ca, Sr, and Ba) to change the band gap[67, 68]. Recently, Dong et al. prepared a novel perovskite-like photocatalyst LiCuTa3O9 (LCTO) with A-sites partially occupied by Li+ or Cu2+ cations and B-sites occupied by Ta5+ cations. As shown in Fig. 5, due to the hybridization of O2p and Cu3d orbits, the VB position of the perovskite was greatly enhanced and it show a visible-light-responded dual functions for water reduction and oxidation[69]. These results indicate that the band structures and crystal structures could be changed by doping of A-site with foreign elements. In addition, doping of X-site of perovskites has also attracted considerable attentions to reduce the band gap for water splitting. In these materials, perovskite oxynitrides are a kind of materials that can absorb visible light for water splitting since the doped N can form a new VB, which leads to upward shift of the top of VB and reduces the band gap[27]. Moreover, the anion doping of O-site for titanates has also been reported to enhance the photoactivity for water splitting. The calculated and experimental results indicate that S/N-doped NaTaO3 shows the remarkably reduced band gap since the new p orbital energies formed by the dopant are higher than the O2p orbits[70, 71].

Figure  5.  (Color online) Schematic illustration of (a) the band structure and (b) DOS (density of states) plots of LCTO, (c) typical time course of photocatalytic H2 evolution reaction, (d) photocatalytic O2 evolution rate as a function of the cutoff wavelength of incident light. Reprinted from Ref. [69].

In addition to one element or one site doped of perovskite materials, many two elements doped perovskite photocatalysts with strong visible light absorption have been reported. For example, Cr, B-codoped-SrTiO3 had been synthesized by Yu et al. The narrowed band gap of this material with strong visible light absorption is due to strong p-d repulsion of doped B2p orbits with Cr3d orbits. The results offer a novel route that co-doping of two elements can also modify the band structure of perovskite materials[72]. Similarly, Luo et al. studied the effects of B and Fe co-doping on the ability of visible light absorption and the activity of SrTiO3 photocatalyst[73]. It is confirmed that the two elements are successfully doped into the SrTiO3 matrix where B substituted O anions, while Fe substituted Ti cations, which leads to the band gap of SrTiO3 significantly reduced from 3.4 to 1.9 eV. Recently, Domen et al. discovered LaMgxTa1–xO1+3xN2–3x solid solutions that could realize overall water splitting under visible light irradiation when the compounds with x ≥ 0.33. The experimental results revealed that co-substitution of Mg2+ for Ta5+ and O2– for N3–, respectively, could tune the band position of the compounds especially for the valence band position. When increasing the oxygen content of the compounds, the top of VB would shift toward the more positive potential which is benefit for water oxidation to realize overall water splitting[74].

Some researchers have also investigated the solid solutions that are composed of two different perovskite materials to overcome the limitations of wide band gap for solar water splitting, including Na0.5La0.5TiO3-LaCrO3, AgNbO3-SrTiO3, SrTiO3-LaTiO2N, and BiFeO3-SrTiO3 (BFO-STO)[75-79]. In these materials, the band structure can be effectively modified by doping with nonmetal elements (e.g., C, N, and S), 3d transition elements, and cations with d0 or d10 or d10s2 electronic structures[6, 20, 27, 67, 80]. Driscoll et al. have explored the underlying mechanism of enhanced solar water splitting ability by constructing a thin film system of BFO-STO[81]. As shown in Fig. 6, the bottom of CB is raised and an exponential tail of trap states is formed near the CB edge by hybridizing of Ti3d and Fe3d orbits, and the new trap states can strongly suppress the fast recombination of photon-generated carriers and enlarge the absorption of the compounds to visible-light region.

Figure  6.  (Color online) (a) Schematic diagram of band positions relative to the vacuum level and NHE for the BFO50-STO50 film. A, B, and C represent the photoexcited carriers relaxation and recombination processes. (b) Current density-potential curves of BFO, BFO75-STO25, BFO50-STO50, BFO25-STO75, and STO films. Reprinted from Ref. [81].

In general, the crystal structure, crystallinity, particle shape and size of the photocatalyst are directly related to the surface area of photocatalysts and the diffusion pathway of charge carriers, which can directly affect the photocatalytic activity of the photocatalysts[82, 83]. Although modifying the crystal structure and morphology of the perovskite photocatalysts may not make influence on altering the electronic structures and the spectral response range of the parent materials, it can affect the separation and migration efficiency of photogenerated carriers, which is one of the most important steps in solar water splitting. The photogenerated carriers can be separated effectively between different facets, which can be realized by modulating the morphology of the perovskite photocatalysts. Therefore, the exposed facets of crystals are important for the photocatalytic performance of the photocatalysts especially for the low symmetry nanocrystals. SrTiO3 is a very common cubic phase perovskite photocatalyst for solar water splitting[84]. As shown in Fig. 7, by controlling the nucleation and growth process of nanocrystal, Mu et al. successfully tailored the morphology and constructed a 18-facet SrTiO3, which realized the exposed facets of high symmetry SrTiO3 nanocrystals from isotropic facets (6-facet SrTiO3) to anisotropic facets (18-facet SrTiO3). Interestingly, they found that the distribution of the reduction and oxidation catalytic sites on the two nanocrystals was different. For the 6-facet SrTiO3, the reduction and oxidation catalytic sites are randomly distributed on the isotropic facets. However, for the 18-facet SrTiO3, the two different catalytic sites are regularly distributed on the different anisotropic facets, respectively. Based on this performance, by selectively depositing the reduction and oxidation cocatalysts on the different anisotropic facets of 18-facet SrTiO3 nanocrystals, the photogenerated carriers can be separated effectively between the anisotropic facets and the photocatalytic performance of the photocatalyst can be greatly improved[85]. Moreover, a BaTiO3 nanocubes supported CdSe quantum dots (QDs) compound structure is reported by Zhong et al., and used as the model to investigate the the synergetic effect of different exposed facets on the activity of heterogeneous catalyst system. By a simple solvothermal method, BaTiO3 exposed with different facets was synthesized, and CdSe QDs were successfully deposited on isotropic facets of 6-facet cubic BaTiO3 and anisotropic facets of 30-facet varietal cubic BaTiO3 by a novel chemical bath strategy. Interestingly, due to the high efficiency of charge separation between BaTiO3 and CdSe QDs and the synergetic effects of {001} and {230} facets on inhibiting the recombination of photogenerated carriers, the CdSe QDs deposited on 30-facet BaTiO3 demonstrated enhancement of apparent photocurrent and superior performance compared to CdSe QDs sensitized cubic 6-facet BaTiO3[86]. These findings suggest that modulating the morphology of perovskites can change its exposed crystal facets, which can make a great effect on the separation efficiency of charge carriers, resulting in improving the photocatalytic activity of the perovskite photocatalysts.

Figure  7.  (Color online) The morphology engineering strategy for SrTiO3 nanocrystals. (a–c) The morphology of 6-facet SrTiO3 nanocrystals. (d) The structure of the {001} facet of SrTiO3. (e) The schematic description of changing SrTiO3 nanocrystals from 6-facet to 18-facet. (f–h) The morphology of 18-facet SrTiO3 nanocrystals. (i) The structure of the {110} facet of SrTiO3. Reprinted from Ref. [85].

Some researchers have also investigated the effects of restructuring the crystal structure of the perovskite on the electronic structure and the according photocatalytic performance of photocatalyst for solar water splitting. By means of systematic density functional theory (DFT) computations, Qiao et al. introduced a two-dimensional photocatalyst of monolayer PdSeO3, which has a moderate band gap of 2.84 eV and has rather pronounced optical absorption both in the visible and ultraviolet regions of the solar spectrum. Remarkably, the valence and conduction bands of PdSeO3 perfectly engulf the redox potentials of water, which make it can be utilized as a highly efficient photocatalyst for direct overall water splitting without using sacrificial reagents and cocatalysts[87]. In addition, Li et al. fabricated two kinds of NaNbO3 with different crystal structures of cubic and orthorhombic phase, respectively. As shown in Fig. 8, the orthorhombic NaNbO3 showed a larger band gap than the cubic NaNbO3. Correspondingly, the photocatalytic hydrogen production activity of cubic NaNbO3 was nearly two times higher than that of orthorhombic NaNbO3[31]. The DFT calculation demonstrated that the higher photocatalytic performance of cubic NaNbO3 could be attributed to its unique electronic structure with high symmetry, which was beneficial to the excitation and transfer process of photogenerated carriers. Moreover, four distinct types of Lead Magnesium Titanate (PMT) perovskites including the shapes of spheres, flakes, hierarchical flower and thin microbelts had been synthesized by Chandrasekaran et al.[88]. Owing to the remarkable structural features of the microbelts such as a large surface area, high optical absorbance, more active sites and high interface area, which provided large contact areas of the electrolyte with highly active materials and a rapid route for charge transfer, the PMT perovskite with the thin microbelt structure showed the highest photoconversion efficiency for water splitting.

Figure  8.  (Color online) (a) UV–vis absorption spectra and (b) typical time course of photocatalytic H2 evolution reaction of c-NaNbO3 (cubic NaNbO3) and o-NaNbO3 (orthorhombic NaNbO3) samples. Reprinted from Ref. [31].

Particle size can also influence the photocatalytic activity. Since the smaller particles have a larger specific surface area and smaller period for migration of the photogenerated carriers to the surface of photocatalysts, which could reduce the probability of charge recombination and improve the photocatalytic activity of photocatalysts. Parida et al. synthesized LaFeO3 NPs with different particle sizes by a sol-gel method under different activated temperatures from 500 to 900 °C for 2 h[89]. All the prepared photocatalysts exhibited visible light activity for solar water splitting, and the samples calcined at 500 °C showed the highest amount of H2 and O2 evolution. The enhanced photocatalytic activity of LaFeO3 calcined at 500 °C was consistent with the small particle size and the according larger BET-surface. Tijare et al. also compared the photocatalytic activities of the LaFeO3 samples synthesized by the sol-gel method and the solid state route, respectively[90]. The results showed that due to the higher surface area and nanosized particle morphology of the sol-gel-generated LaFeO3, it exhibited higher photocatalytic activity for water splitting than the samples with the same composition synthesized by the solid state route under visible light irradiation. A similar results was reported for SrSnO3 where peanut-shaped SrSnO3 synthesized using the aqueous peroxide route exhibited much higher photocatalytic activity than the samples synthesized via a solid-state reaction, which is due to the different structural order, surface area and particle size of the two kinds of samples[91]. Krtil et al. demonstrated that the size and shape of SrTiO3 have a strong influence on its PEC activity. The different samples were synthesized by tuning the content of gelatin, which determines the size and band gap of the perovskite nano-cubes. The results showed that all the samples were active in PEC water splitting, and their specific activity decreases with decreasing particle size and drops exponentially with crystal size below 20 nm[92]. In addition, the crystalline quality of the photocatalyst can strongly affect its photocatalytic activity. Due to the strong negative correlation between crystalline quality and the amount of defects, the higher crystalline quality can decrease the amount of defects which can operate as trapping and recombination centers of photogenerated electrons and holes and then reduce the photocatalytic activity[44]. Kudo et al. found that the high calcination temperature can increase the crystallinity of SrTiO3 and enhance its photocatalytic activity because the number of defects decreases with the increase of crystallinity[93].

Due to their unique performances in the separation and migration photoexcited charge carriers, the application of ferroelectric materials for solar water splitting is another potentially efficient approach to overcome the limits of the traditional semiconductors[94]. Ferroelectric perovskite materials, such as BiFeO3 (BFO) and Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 (PZT)[95-98], usually have a large, stable and tunable remnant ferroelectric polarization which can produces a permanent electrical polarization field. This internal electric field is useful for separating the photoexcited charge carriers and switching the charge-transfer directions. Interestingly, the orientation and intensities of the polarization field can be controlled by external applied voltages, which is useful for solar water splitting with a photoelectrode because the controllable field of a ferroelectric photoelectrode can make it as both a photocathode and a photoanode, giving a highly realizable possibility to drive both water oxidation and reduction just by a ferroelectric photoelectrode through tuning the orientation of remnant polarization. Based on this, our group fabricated a series of polycrystalline BFO photoelectrodes by a cost-advantageous spin-coating technology. As shown in Figs. 9(a)9(d), due to the distinct ferroelectric performance of the ferroelectric perovskite materials, the orientations of the band bending for BFO at the BFO/electrolyte can be switched from up with –8 V poling pretreatment to down after –8 V poling pretreatment. Accordingly, the external quantum efficiency and photocurrent of the photoelectrodes are changed with different polarization states. Moreover, the systematical PEC investigations indicate that the charge-transfer directions of photoexcited charges both in the BFO and in the surface modifiers, such as molecular dyes and CdSe QDs can be tuned by changing the poling conditions of the ferrroeletric photoelectrodes. These results demonstrate the adjustable polarization field of ferroelectric perovskite materials can be used for PEC reaction, which provides a new strategy to design smart PEC systems for driving both water oxidation and reduction on a single photoelectrode[99]. Recently, another typical example that used ferroelectric perovskite materials for PEC water splitting was reported by Song et al., who systematically summarized the effects of ferroelectric switching under different polarization states on PEC behaviors[100]. The different polarization states can induce different band bending which is important for the migration and separation of charge carries, and influences the PEC performances of the photoelectrodes. In addition, our group employed a ferroelectric perovskite material and constructed nano-Au based photoelectrodes to study and manipulate the hot-electrons transfer in the plasmonic hybrids. The results indicate that the PEC properties of the hybrids can be effectively manipulated by switching the direction of the depolarization field in the employed ferroelectric perovskite material, which provides a flexible platform to freely manipulate the injection and transfer of hot-electrons generated by the plasmonic hybrids. As described in Figs. 9(e) and 9(f), the orientation of the associated depolarization electric field (EDP) is towards the ITO substrate after + 10 V poling pretreatment, and the formed downward band bending for PZT at the interface with electrolyte is favorable for transferring hot electrons to the surface to drive water reduction reaction. However, after –10 V poling pretreatment, the orientation of EDP is switched towards the interface of PZT and electrolyte, and the formed upward band bending for PZT at the interface blocks the hot electrons transferring to the surface to drive the reaction. In this case, the transferred hot electrons are trapped in the bulk of PZT films, leaving the hot holes to drive PEC oxidation reactions[101].

Figure  9.  (Color online) (a) External quantum yield spectra measured for BFO electrodes before poling and after + 8 and –8 V poling. (b) Photocurrent-potential characteristics of the photoelectrodes with different polarization states. Schematic illustrations of the mechanisms in photoexcited charge transfer from BFO films to the electrolyte and from excited surface modifiers to the BFO films after the BFO films were (c) positively and (d) negatively poled. Reprinted from Ref. [99]. (e, f) Schematic electronic band structure and the mechanisms for the injected hot-electron transfer from PZT films to the electrolyte for the two poling configurations. Reprinted from Ref. [101].

Since there are many inherent limitations in the light absorption and the catalytic performance of the ferroelectric perovskite materials when they are used alone for solar water splitting, many recent studies that using ferroelectric material as a part of the heterojunction structures have been reported. According to the previous studies, the tunable remnant ferroelectric polarization in the ferroelectric material of the ferroelectric-based heterojunction could redistribute the charge carriers in the ferroelectric materials and its adjacent semiconductor. Thus, utilizing tunable ferroelectric polarization of ferroelectric material could change the band structure and modulate the performance of the ferroelectric-based heterojunction[102]. Huang et al. combined the metal-sulfide nanoparticles (CdS) and ferroelectric nano-materials (BaTiO3) to construct a ferroelectric-based heterojunction. The results demonstrated that the hydrogen production activity of the composite photocatalyst can be greatly improved by the employed BaTiO3. The mechanistic study revealed that the dipolar fields in the BaTiO3 could enhance the separation and transfer process of charge carriers generated in CdS, and thus improved the hydrogen production efficiency of the composite photocatalyst[103]. Yang et al. reported a ferroelectric BaTiO3/TiO2 heterojunction structure, which showed marked improvement in water oxidation reactions as the result of the increased band bending of TiO2 nanowires and the enhanced separation of photogenerated charge carriers induced by the spontaneous electrical polarization of BaTiO3[104]. Similarly, Li et al. constructed a PbTiO3 based ferroelectric heterojunction by tunable epitaxial growth of TiO2 on the selective polar surface of single-crystal and single-domain ferroelectric PbTiO3 nanoplates. The heterostructures demonstrated a polarization dependent photocatalytic performance for photodegradation and water splitting, due to the crucial role of ferroelectric polarization effects[105]. In addition, BaTiO3/TiO2[106], SrTiO3/TiO2[107] and BiFeO3/BiVO4[108] heterojunctions were also reported to investigate the ferroelectric effect of ferroelectric perovskite materials on the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance. The experimental and calculational results revealed that the ferroelectric polarization effect has positive impact on the heterojunction and could enhance their activity for solar water oxidation. All these results indicate that the internal field induced by the ferroelectric polarization effect can enhance the separation and migration of the photogenerated electrons and holes. However, there are many limiting factors, such as high dielectric constant and insulativity of ferroelectric materials, thus it needs to intensively study for applying the ferroelectric materials in photocatalytic water splitting[56, 57].

The approach of construction of heterojunction structure is another effective strategy for improving photocatalytic activity of perovskite materials for solar water splitting. A suitable heterojunction nano-architecture, where the formed band structure is favorable for the charge carriers generation in one semiconductor and transport them to the adjacent materials vectorially, which can result in efficient charge separation and fast charge migration, and can expand the light absorption range of the wide bandgap perovskite materials when combining them with a narrow bandgap semiconductor[109, 110]. Many perovskite-based heterojunction structures have been reported to explore their effect on solar water splitting. Most of them are type-II heterojunctions. As shown in Fig. 10(a), Nashim et al. prepared a series of La2Ti2O7/LaCrO3 heterojunction based photocatalysts through a solid state method. The prepared photocatalysts showed a great boost in the photocatalytic activity of solar water splitting under visible light irradiation, which is mainly because of the synergetic effect of the visible light activation of La2Ti2O7 and retarded recombination rate of charge carriers by the formed heterojunctions[111]. Xu et al. synthesized a g-C3N4/SrTiO3 composite photocatalyst by simply decomposing urea in the presence of SrTiO3 at 400 °C. Due to the formed heterojunction structure, the g-C3N4 and SrTiO3 were closely connected and the photogenerated electrons and holes were effectively separated, thus, the catalyst exhibited an improved photocatalytic activity for H2 production under visible light irradiation[112]. Similarly, as shown in Fig. 10(b), Kang et al. also constructed a g-C3N4/SrTiO3:Rh composite photocatalyst to improve the hydrogen evolution rate from the viable-light driven solar water splitting. The highest hydrogen evolution rate was attained when combining 20 wt% g-C3N4 with SrTiO3:Rh, which was mainly attributed to the efficient electron-hole separation and transportation in the heterojunctions of the organic and inorganic materials under visible light irradiation[113]. In addition, to investigate the synergistic effects of the coupled graphene oxide (GO) sheet and foreign element loaded on the NaNbO3, Opoku et al. designed a bi-functional GO/V-doped NaNbO3 heterostructure photocatalyst and detected the effect on the photocatalytic performance of NaNbO3 with wide band gap using dispersion-corrected hybrid DFT calculations. The hetero-structure photocatalyst demonstrates a high stability and activity for hydrogen generation during water splitting process. The systematic studies reveal that the improved photocatalytic activity of hydrogen evolution is mostly ascribed to the loading of GO sheet and V binary cocatalysts on the NaNbO3, where the formed type-II heterojunction between GO sheet and NaNbO3 can promote the interfacial charge carriers separation and restrain the recombination of them. Moreover, GO sheet with high electrical conductivity and specific surface area can provide efficient electron channels for the separation of charge carriers, hence further improve the photocatalytic performance of the composite catalyst[114].

Figure  10.  (Color online) Schematic illustration of the (a) electron–hole separation of La2Ti2O7/LaCrO3 heterojunction and (b) g-C3N4/SrTiO3:Rh composite under visible light irradiation. Reprinted from Refs. [111, 113], respectively.

Some new strategies that systematically investigate the synergistic effects of heterojunction and other modifications such as changing of crystal structure and doping of foreign elements have been used to construct perovskite based catalysts for water splitting reaction. For example, Jia et al. constructed a BiVO4-Ru/SrTiO3:Rh composite Z-scheme photocatalyst by an impregnation method and a liquid-solid state reaction. The suitable contact was formed between BiVO4 and Ru/SrTiO3:Rh, which resulted in efficient electron transfer at interface, and the present composite photocatalyst demonstrated a high activity for water splitting under visible light irradiation. The indepth study showed that the crystallinity and morphology of BiVO4 could also have effects on the photocatalytic activity of the composite[115]. Similarly, Dong et al. constructed a visible-light response Z-scheme photocatalyst using ultrathin 2D BiVO4 nanosheets (NSs) as the oxygen evolving photocatalys, Ru/SrTiO3:Rh as the hydrogen evolving photocatalyst, Fe2+/Fe3+ as the redox mediator, respectively. The study reveals that the superior photocatalytic activity of the as-prepared BiVO4 NSs is attributed to its unique morphology and crystal phase with ligand-free surfaces, large-scale exposed {010} planes, and widely distributed VO in a crystalline structure[116]. In order to use the layered perovskite-type wide-gap semiconductor La2Ti2O7 (LTO) to construct a visible-light-driven photocatalyst, Ma et al. had constructed g-C3N4-based heterojunction model and systematically investigated the synergistic effect of doping and heterojunction on enhancing visible light absorption and photogenerated carriers separation. The results of DFT calculations showed that the doping N or S into the LTO surface could notably decrease the band gap and enhance the light absorption efficiency of it. Moreover, the formed type-II band alignment between the doped LTO and g-C3N4 can efficiently separate the charge carriers. The results suggest that S-doped LTO/g-C3N4 composite would be a potential photocatalyst for solar water splitting[117].

In addition to the construction of Z-scheme photocatalyst, using the effect of structure engineering and heterojunction synergistically can also improve the activity of photocatalyst. As shown in Fig. 11, Wei et al. constructed a hollow multi-shelled (HoMs) SrTiO3/TiO2 heterojunction by a hydrothermal crystallization method. The broccoli-like SrTiO3/TiO2 heterogeneous HoMs structures exhibited a fourfold higher overall water splitting performance than that of bare SrTiO3, which could be attributed to the special HoMs structures and the fabricated heterojunctions. It was reported that the HoMs structures could increase the light absorption ability of the composite photocatalysts and the constructed heterojunctions could boost the transfer and separation efficiency of the photogenerated electrons and holes. Therefore, the HoMs structures are helpful for enhancing the photocatalytic activity of the SrTiO3/TiO2 heterojunctions[118]. Chang et al. also constructed a ternary CdS/Au/3DOM-SrTiO3 composite photocatalyst, which showed a dramatically improved photocatalytic activity for water reduction. The remarkably enhanced photocatalytic performance was mainly due to the slow photon region of 3DOM-SrTiO3, which was well matched the optical absorption band of the composite and could significantly enhance the light absorption efficiency of the ternary composite[119].

Figure  11.  (Color online) (a) Synthesis route of SrTiO3/TiO2 HoMs from hydrothermal reaction. (b) Typical time course of photocatalytic H2 and O2 evolution reaction of triple shelled SrTiO3/TiO2 HoMs photocatalyst. (c) Possible band structure diagram for SrTiO3/TiO2 HoMs. Reprinted from Ref. [118].

The decoration of semiconductors with plasmonic metals and construction of plasmonic-based photocatalysts is another promising way to improve the photocatalytic performance of photocatalysts for solar water splitting. Generally, there are four main mechanisms of plasmonic effects on the photocatalytic process of solar water splitting, including: i) the improvement of light absorption efficiency by either trapping or scattering light into the semiconductors using the plasmonic metal nanoparticles (NPs); ii) hot-electrons injection; iii) plasmon-induced resonance energy transfer (PIRET) and iv) the role of cocatalysis[120, 121]. Based on these effects, many different plasmonic NPs/perovskite composite catalysts have been developed for solar water splitting, such as Ag/KTaO3, Ag/NaTaO3, Ag/SrTiO3, Au/SrTiO3[122-124]. Our group has introduced a well-known catalyst, LaCoO3, to the community of water splitting using solar energy. As shown in Fig. 12(a), by combining with Au NPs, the plasmonic-based hot electrons injection from Au NPs to LaCoO3 is responsible for amplifying the photocatalytic efficiency while the well-known thermal-stimulus for driving chemical transformations is not observed to be influential. Such charge transportation process is crucial for promoting the subsequent water splitting and HCHO decomposition reactions. For the first time, we have differentiated the contributions of hot charge transfer from thermal-stimulus in excited plasmonic materials to the PEC efficiency improvement of the composite devices[125]. Moreover, we have constructed a plasmon-based Au/LaFeO3 composite photocatalyst to investigate the complex roles of hot electrons and holes for solar water splitting. Benefiting from the formation of Schottky junction and surface plasmon resonance effect of the Au NPs, the synthesized photocatalyst exhibits an excellent photocatalytic activity for solar water splitting. The in-depth investigation reveals that the improved hydrogen evolution is caused by the hot electrons injection from Au to LaFeO3, and the hot holes in Au induced by the separation of hot charges can initiate the water oxidation directly on the surface of gold[126]. To broaden the light absorption range of photocatalysts for solar water splitting, Cai et al. designed an Au nano-rods (NRs) modified La2Ti2O7 nano-steps (Au-LTO NSP) by loading the visible and NIR plasmonic absorption responded Au NRs on the surface of LTO NSP. As shown in Figs. 12(b) and 12(c), the Au-LTO NSP composite exhibited significantly high photocatalytic activity for hydrogen generation when irradiated by the light with wavelengths longer than 420 and 780 nm. The single-particle fluorescence measurements indicated that the plasmonic-induced hot electrons injection of Au NRs increased the number of electrons transfer to LTO NSP, realizing the more efficient utilization of the long-wavelength solar light for the composite in the redox reaction[127]. Moreover, Shi et al. has developed a type of nonmetallic plasmonic perovskite semiconductor with plasmon-enhanced activity for solar water splitting. Due to the high charge carrier density induced by oxygen vacancies, the constructed SrTiO3 photoelectrode with a crystalline-core@amorphous-shell structure shows an intense localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) in the visible light region and displays much higher plasmon-induced PEC water splitting performance than the pristine SrTiO3 photoelectrode[128]. To promote the efficiency of water splitting system, Zhong et al. constructed an Au based water splitting device by using of both sides of the same SrTiO3 single-crystal substrate. The study indicated that the chemical bias was significantly reduced by the plasmonic effects and the catalytic reaction spectrum corresponds to the plasmonic absorption spectrum closely, which suggested that the plasmon-induced charge separation at the Au/SrTiO3 interface could improve both the water oxidation and reduction[129].

Figure  12.  (Color online) Schematic illustration of (a) the photogenerated charge transfer and catalytic reaction mechanisms of the fabricated LaCoO3/Au nano-composite (Reprinted from Ref. [125]), and (b) the prepared Au/LTO NSP. (c) The diffuse reflectance spectra (left axis, blue line) and apparent quantum efficiency (right axis, red column) of Au-LTO NSP under vis-NIR (λ > 420 nm) light irradiation. Reprinted from Ref. [127].

Additionally, some studies on using the synergistic effect of plasmonic enhancement and other strategies have been reported to improve the activity of catalyst to an unprecedentedly high level for solar water splitting. Our group has combined the plasmon resonance effect with the ferroelectric enhancement, and designed a plasmonic-ferroeletric hybrid PEC photoelectrode. As shown in Fig. 13, we explored the charge transfer and transport in nano-Au/PZT hybrids by constructing three nanostructures including ITO/Au/PZT, ITO/PZT/Au/PZT, and ITO/PZT/Au, and by poling the PZT films with different potentials. Due to the LSPR effect of the nano-Au, the nano-Au/PZT hybrids could broaden the light absorbance to the NIR range (800 nm). The spatial distribution of the electric field intensity around the square dot was obtained by the finite difference time domain (FDTD) method under 800 nm light illumination. It indicated that the strong field was located at the edge of the Au square and the hot spots might increase the probability of the hot charge carriers transfer from Au to the nearby materials. Moreover, using the ITO/PZT/nano-Au/PZT electrodes, we demonstrated the tunable photocurrent by changing the pre-poling bias from –10 to +10 V. This is attributed to the ferroeletric performance of the PZT, which can form different band bending at PZT/electrolyte interface under different pre-poling bias and affect the hot electron transfer from Au to PZT. The femtosecond transient absorbance results even more confirmed the hot charge transfer from Au NPs to PZT[101]. Similarly, Au/BFO, Ag/BFO, and Ag/PZT were also constructed to utilize the SPR effect and ferroelectric performance synergistically for improving the catalytic activity of the PEC systems[98, 130, 131]. Furthermore, to improve the utilization efficiency of solar energy and achieve highly efficient STH conversion, Zhu et al. combined the Au/LTO with black phosphorus (BP) to design a broadband solar response photocatalyst. The composite photocatalyst shows 74 and 60 fold higher of photocatalytic activities than the pristine component of BP and LTO at wavelengths longer than 420 and 780 nm, respectively. Time-resolved diffuse reflectance spectroscopy revealed that the efficient electron transfers caused by the broad absorption of BP and SPR enhancement effect of plasmonic Au in the visible and NIR light regions, and the formed intimate heterojunction of BP and Au/LTO, were contributed to the improved photocatalytic performance of the composite photocatalyst[132]. Chang et al. developed a ternary composite by the three dimensionally ordered macroporous (3DOM) SrTiO3, Au and CdS nano materials. Duo to the synergistic effects of Au SPR, efficient carrier separation of the formed heterojunction and slow photon effect of the 3DOM-SrTiO3, the CdS/Au/3DOM-SrTiO3 composite showed an extraordinarily high hydrogen evolution rate when depositing Pt NPs on the composite as a co-catalyst[119].

Figure  13.  (Color online) (a) Schematics and cross-section of scanning electron microscope (SEM) of the fabricated ITO/PZT/Au, ITO/PZT/Au/PZT, and ITO/Au/PZT electrodes. (b) Top-view SEM image of nano-Au array fabricated on ITO glass; scale bar, 1 μm. The inset zooms in one part of the SEM; scale bar, 200 nm. (c) FDTD-simulated spatial distribution of the electric field intensity around the square dot illuminated by 800 nm light. (d) Photocurrent-potential measurements of ITO/nano-Au/PZT(black), ITO/PZT/nano-Au/PZT (red) and ITO/PZT/nano-Au (blue) under the white-light excitation (filtered, > 450 nm). (e) Photocurrent-potential measurements of the ITO/PZT/nano-Au/PZT (the as-grown (black), + 10 V (red) and –10 V (blue) poled) under the white-light excitation (filtered, > 450 nm). Reprinted from Ref. [101].

In this review, we reviewed recent progress and the design strategies in the field of solar water splitting based on the perovskite materials. Our aims were to provide some useful guidance for future research on the design of perovskite-based photocatalysts and systems for water splitting reaction. Although some great progress in the construction of perovskite-based photocatalysts and systems for water splitting have also been made by implementing different design strategies, such as adjustment of the chemical component, crystal structure and morphology engineering, application of ferroelectric property, construction of heterojunction structure and plasmonic-based photocatalysts, etc. However, the STH conversion efficiency of the current water splitting systems is still very low (about 2%) for large-scale applications of H2 generation[133]. Therefore, the new materials and strategies are required to improve the STH conversion efficiency. The main problems and perspectives are shown below.

(1) The selection and doping of A, B and X sites elements in the perovskite are proved to effectively reduce the band gap and improve the catalytic activity. However, the low light harvesting ability is still a critical problem of most perovskite-based catalysts for solar water splitting. The development of experimental techniques are needed to precisely control the position, element and concentration of the dopants. Moreover, co-doping of metal and non-metal elements would be a useful strategy to modify the band structures of perovskites to meet the highly efficient solar water splitting.

(2) Surface engineering, crystal structure, morphology engineering, and construction of heterojunction structure have been proved to be four valid strategies for modifying perovskite materials to improve the photo/photoelectrocatalytic activity by facilitating surface reactions, suppressing charge carriers recombination, reducing the particle size and increasing the surface areas, etc. However, the interaction mechanism and the synergetic effect of the different components of the perovskite-based composites have not been clearly addressed. The further efforts such as using the new experimental methods and theoretical calculations should be taken to clarify the problem, which could be the effective directions.

(3) There is an activation barrier for H2 and O2 evolution reactions and most of the perovskite based photocatalysts are broad-band gap materials (> 2 eV), thus, designing and finding the optimal photocatalyst with the best activity and suitable band structure is still the challenge for overall water splitting. Therefore, much more efforts should be taken to develop the photocatalyst with multifunctionality that has wide light absorption range, efficient photogenerated charge carriers separation ability, sufficient catalytic active sites, high stability, and appropriate band structure for water redox reactions. Moreover, utilization of different enhancement effects and some advanced synthetic techniques synergistically to develop the high efficiency photocatalysts and systems could be an effective direction.

(4) In addition to the development of photocatalysts and systems with high activity, systematic investigation of the working mechanisms and reaction mechanisms of the perovskite based photo/photoelectrocatalytic systems should be another critical issue to be addressed. The comprehensively experimental and theoretical studies should be designed and conducted to investigate the intrinsic mechanism of the system in the future, especially for the compound photocatalysts and the complex systems. It may be beneficial for the future research and can provide useful guidance for design of perovskite based photocatalytic system with superior photo/photoelectrocatalytic activity and stability. Therefore, more efficient experimental and computational methods need to be developed in the future to overcome these problems.

This work was mostly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21975245, 51972300 and 61674141), Key Research Program of Frontier Science, CAS (Grant No. QYZDB-SSW-SLH006), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0206600, 2018YFE0204000), the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2014CB643503), Z. W. appreciates the support from Hundred-Talent Program (Chinese Academy of Sciences).



[1]
Hosseini S E, Wahid M A. Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 2016, 57, 850 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.112
[2]
Vita A, Italiano C, Pino L, et al. Hydrogen-rich gas production by steam reforming of n-dodecane. Part II: Stability, regenerability and sulfur poisoning of low loading Rh-based catalyst. Appl Catal B, 2017, 218, 317 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.059
[3]
Hisatomi T, Domen K. Reaction systems for solar hydrogen production via water splitting with particulate semiconductor photocatalysts. Nat Catal, 2019, 2(5), 387 doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0242-6
[4]
Wang W, Xu M, Xu X, et al. Perovskite oxide-based electrodes for high-performance photoelectrochemical water splitting. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2019, 58, 2 doi: 10.1002/anie.201900292
[5]
Chen G, Hu Z, Zhu Y, et al. A universal strategy to design superior water-splitting electrocatalysts based on fast in situ reconstruction of amorphous nanofilm precursors. Adv Mater, 2018, 30(43), 1804333 doi: 10.1002/adma.201804333
[6]
Zhang G, Liu G, Wang L Z, et al. Inorganic perovskite photocatalysts for solar energy utilization. Chem Soc Rev, 2016, 45(21), 5951 doi: 10.1039/C5CS00769K
[7]
Sheng X, Xu T, Feng X J. Rational design of photoelectrodes with rapid charge transport for photoelectrochemical applications. Adv Mater, 2019, 31(11), 1805132 doi: 10.1002/adma.201805132
[8]
Chen W J, Wang T T, Xue J W, et al. Cobalt-nickel layered double hydroxides modified on TiO2 nanotube arrays for highly efficient and stable PEC water splitting. Small, 2017, 13(10), 1602420 doi: 10.1002/smll.201602420
[9]
Faraji M, Yousefi M, Yousefzadeh S, et al. Two-dimensional materials in semiconductor photoelectrocatalytic systems for water splitting. Energ Environ Sci, 2019, 12(1), 59 doi: 10.1039/C8EE00886H
[10]
Huang X, Qi X Y, Boey F, et al. Graphene-based composites. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41(2), 666 doi: 10.1039/C1CS15078B
[11]
Li X, Liu S W, Fan K, et al. MOF-based transparent passivation layer modified ZnO nanorod arrays for enhanced photo-electrochemical water splitting. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8(18), 1800101 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201800101
[12]
Ong W J, Tan L L, Ng Y H, et al. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis and environmental remediation: are we a step closer to achieving sustainability. Chem Rev, 2016, 116(12), 7159 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075
[13]
Wang S C, Chen P, Bai Y, et al. New BiVO4 dual photoanodes with enriched oxygen vacancies for efficient solar-driven water splitting. Adv Mater, 2018, 30(20), 1800486 doi: 10.1002/adma.201800486
[14]
Xu Y F, Rao H S, Chen B X, et al. Achieving highly efficient photoelectrochemical water oxidation with a TiCl4 treated 3D antimony-doped SnO2 macropore/branched alpha-Fe2O3 nanorod heterojunction photoanode. Adv Sci, 2015, 2(7), 1500049 doi: 10.1002/advs.201500049
[15]
Yeh T F, Teng C Y, Chen L C, et al. Graphene oxide-based nanomaterials for efficient photoenergy conversion. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4(6), 2014 doi: 10.1039/C5TA07780J
[16]
Zhang Z M, Gao C T, W u Z M, et al. Toward efficient photoelectrochemical water-splitting by using screw-like SnO2 nanostructures as photoanode after being decorated with CdS quantum dots. Nano Energy, 2016, 19, 318 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.011
[17]
Zhou Y E, Zhang L Y, Lin L H, et al. Highly efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting from hierarchical WO3/BiVO4 nanoporous sphere arrays. Nano Lett, 2017, 17(12), 8012 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04626
[18]
Pinaud B A, Benck J D, Seitz L C, et al. Technical and economic feasibility of centralized facilities for solar hydrogen production via photocatalysis and photoelectrochemistry. Energ Environ Sci, 2013, 6(7), 1983 doi: 10.1039/c3ee40831k
[19]
Tan P, Liu M L, Shao Z P, et al. Recent advances in perovskite oxides as electrode materials for nonaqueous lithium-oxygen batteries. Adv Energy Mater, 2017, 7(13), 1602674 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201602674
[20]
Wang W, Tade M O, Shao Z P. Nitrogen-doped simple and complex oxides for photocatalysis: A review. Prog Mater Sci, 2018, 92, 33 doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.09.002
[21]
Pena M A, Fierro J L. Chemical structures and performance of perovskite oxides. Chem Rev, 2001, 101(7), 1981 doi: 10.1021/cr980129f
[22]
Suntivich J, May K J, Gasteiger H A, et al. A perovskite oxide optimized for oxygen evolution catalysis from molecular orbital principles. Science, 2011, 334(6061), 1383 doi: 10.1126/science.1212858
[23]
Hwang J, Rao R R, Giordano L, et al. Perovskites in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Science, 2017, 358(6364), 751 doi: 10.1126/science.aam7092
[24]
Cheng Z Y, Lin J. Layered organic-inorganic hybrid perovskites: structure, optical properties, film preparation, patterning and templating engineering. CrystEngComm, 2010, 12(10), 2646 doi: 10.1039/c001929a
[25]
Green M A, Ho-Baillie A, Snaith H J. The emergence of perovskite solar cells. Nat Photonics, 2014, 8(7), 506 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.134
[26]
Goldschmidt V M. Crystal structure and chemical correlation. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges, 1927, 60, 1263 doi: 10.1002/cber.19270600550
[27]
Wang W, Tade M O, Shao Z P. Research progress of perovskite materials in photocatalysis- and photovoltaics-related energy conversion and environmental treatment. Chem Soc Rev, 2015, 44(15), 5371 doi: 10.1039/C5CS00113G
[28]
Li C, Soh K C K, Wu P. Formability of ABO3 perovskites. J Alloy Compd, 2004, 372(1/2), 40 doi: 10.1016/S0925-8388(03)01146-0
[29]
Li C H, Lu X G, Ding W Z, et al. Formability of ABX3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) halide perovskites. Acta Crystallogr B, 2008, 64, 702 doi: 10.1107/S0108768108032734
[30]
Hu C C, Lee Y L, Teng H S. Efficient water splitting over Na1– xKxTaO3 photocatalysts with cubic perovskite structure. J Mater Chem, 2011, 21(11), 3824 doi: 10.1039/c0jm03451g
[31]
Li P, Ouyang S X, Xi G C, et al. The effects of crystal structure and electronic structure on photocatalytic H2 evolution and CO2 reduction over two phases of perovskite-structured NaNbO3. J Phys Chem C, 2012, 116(14), 7621 doi: 10.1021/jp210106b
[32]
Cohen R E. Origin of ferroelectricity in perovskite oxides. Nature, 1992, 358(6382), 136 doi: 10.1038/358136a0
[33]
Ohtomo A, Hwang H Y. A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface. Nature, 2004, 427(6973), 423 doi: 10.1038/nature02308
[34]
Reyren N, Thiel S, Caviglia A D, et al. Superconducting interfaces between insulating oxides. Science, 2007, 317(5842), 1196 doi: 10.1126/science.1146006
[35]
Jin S, Tiefel T H, McCormack M, et al. Thousandfold change in resistivity in magnetoresistive La–Ca–Mn–O films. Science, 1994, 264(5157), 413 doi: 10.1126/science.264.5157.413
[36]
Huang K, Tichy R S, Goodenough J B. Superior perovskite oxide-Ion conductor; strontium- and magnesium-doped LaGaO3:I, phase relationships and electrical properties. J Am Ceram Soc, 1998, 81(10), 2565 doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02662.x
[37]
Ibarra J. Influence of composition on the structure and conductivity of the fast ionic conductors La2/3− xLi3 xTiO3 (0.03 ≤ x ≤ 0.167). Solid State Ionics, 2000, 134(3/4), 219 doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00761-X
[38]
Chan K S, Ma J, Jaenicke S, et al. Catalytic carbon-monoxide oxidation over strontium, cerium and copper-substituted lanthanum manganates and cobaltates. Appl Catal A, 1994, 107(2), 201 doi: 10.1016/0926-860X(94)85156-5
[39]
Royer S, Duprez D, Can F, et al. Perovskites as substitutes of noble metals for heterogeneous catalysis: dream or reality. Chem Rev, 2014, 114(20), 10292 doi: 10.1021/cr500032a
[40]
Yin W J, Weng B, Ge J, et al. Oxide perovskites, double perovskites and derivatives for electrocatalysis, photocatalysis, and photovoltaics. Energ Environ Sci, 2019, 12(2), 442 doi: 10.1039/C8EE01574K
[41]
Mignard D, Batik R C, Bharadwaj A S, et al. Revisiting strontium-doped lanthanum cuprate perovskite for the electrochemical reduction of CO2. J CO2 Util, 2014, 5, 53 doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2013.12.006
[42]
Suntivich J, Gasteiger H A, Yabuuchi N, et al. Design principles for oxygen-reduction activity on perovskite oxide catalysts for fuel cells and metal-air batteries. Nat Chem, 2011, 3(7), 546 doi: 10.1038/nchem.1069
[43]
Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature, 1972, 238(5358), 37 doi: 10.1038/238037a0
[44]
Kudo A, Miseki Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem Soc Rev, 2009, 38(1), 253 doi: 10.1039/B800489G
[45]
Chen S S, Takata T, Domen K. Particulate photocatalysts for overall water splitting. Nat Rev Mater, 2017, 2(10), 17050 doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.50
[46]
Kim J H, Hansora D, Sharma P, et al. Toward practical solar hydrogen production-an artificial photosynthetic leaf-to-farm challenge. Chem Soc Rev, 2019, 48(7), 1908 doi: 10.1039/C8CS00699G
[47]
Yang M Q, Gao M M, Hong M H, et al. Visible-to-NIR photon harvesting: progressive engineering of catalysts for solar-powered environmental purification and fuel production. Adv Mater, 2018, 30(47), 1802894 doi: 10.1002/adma.201802894
[48]
Li X B, Tung C H, Wu L Z. Semiconducting quantum dots for artificial photosynthesis. Nat Rev Chem, 2018, 2(8), 160 doi: 10.1038/s41570-018-0024-8
[49]
Maeda K, Domen K. New non-oxide photocatalysts designed for overall water splitting under visible light. J Phys Chem C, 2007, 111(22), 7851 doi: 10.1021/jp070911w
[50]
Yerga R M N, Galvan M C A, del Valle F, et al. Water splitting on semiconductor catalysts under visible-light irradiation. ChemSusChem, 2009, 2(6), 471 doi: 10.1002/cssc.200900018
[51]
Pushkarev A P, Bochkarev M N. Organic electroluminescent materials and devices emitting in UV and NIR regions. Russ Chem Rev, 2016, 85(12), 1338 doi: 10.1070/RCR4665
[52]
Kang Z, Si H N, Zhang S C, et al. Interface engineering for modulation of charge carrier behavior in ZnO photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29(15), 1808032 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201808032
[53]
Jiang C R, Moniz S J A, Wang A Q, et al. Photoelectrochemical devices for solar water splitting-materials and challenges. Chem Soc Rev, 2017, 46(15), 4645 doi: 10.1039/C6CS00306K
[54]
Kitano M, Takeuchi M, Matsuoka M, et al. Photocatalytic water splitting using Pt-loaded visible light-responsive TiO2 thin film photocatalysts. Catal Today, 2007, 120(2), 133 doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2006.07.043
[55]
Suen N T, Hung S F, Quan Q, et al. Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives. Chem Soc Rev, 2017, 46(2), 337 doi: 10.1039/C6CS00328A
[56]
Kanhere P, Chen Z. A review on visible light active perovskite-based photocatalysts. Molecules, 2014, 19(12), 19995 doi: 10.3390/molecules191219995
[57]
Moniruddin M, Ilyassov B, Zhao X, et al. Recent progress on perovskite materials in photovoltaic and water splitting applications. Mater Today Energy, 2018, 7, 246 doi: 10.1016/j.mtener.2017.10.005
[58]
Khan M A, Nadeem M A, Idrissn H. Ferroelectric polarization effect on surface chemistry and photo-catalytic activity: A review. Surf Sci Rep, 2016, 71(1), 1 doi: 10.1016/j.surfrep.2016.01.001
[59]
Konta R, Ishii T, Kato H, et al. Photocatalytic activities of noble metal ion doped SrTiO3 under visible light irradiation. J Phys Chem B, 2004, 108(26), 8992 doi: 10.1021/jp049556p
[60]
Ohno T, Tsubota T, Nakamura Y, et al. Preparation of S, C cation-codoped SrTiO3 and its photocatalytic activity under visible light. Appl Catal A, 2005, 288(1/2), 74 doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.04.035
[61]
Grabowska E. Selected perovskite oxides: characterization, preparation and photocatalytic properties-A review. Appl Catal B, 2016, 186, 97 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.035
[62]
Kawasaki M, Takahashi K, Maeda T, et al. Atomic control of the SrTiO3 crystal surface. Science, 1994, 266(5190), 1540 doi: 10.1126/science.266.5190.1540
[63]
Iwashina K, Kudo A. Rh-doped SrTiO3 photocatalyst electrode showing cathodic photocurrent for water splitting under visible-light irradiation. J Am Chem Soc, 2011, 133(34), 13272 doi: 10.1021/ja2050315
[64]
Shenoy U S, Bantawal H, Bhat D K. Band engineering of SrTiO3: effect of synthetic technique and site occupancy of doped rhodium. J Phys Chem C, 2018, 122(48), 27567 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10083
[65]
Umebayashi T, Yamaki T, Itoh H, et al. Analysis of electronic structures of 3d transition metal-doped TiO2 based on band calculations. J Phys Chem Solids, 2002, 63(10), 1909 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3697(02)00177-4
[66]
Zou J P, Zhang L Z, Luo S L, et al. Preparation and photocatalytic activities of two new Zn-doped SrTiO3 and BaTiO3 photocatalysts for hydrogen production from water without cocatalysts loading. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2012, 37(22), 17068 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.133
[67]
Machida M, Miyazaki K, Matsushima S, et al. Photocatalytic properties of layered perovskite tantalates, MLnTa2O7 (M = Cs, Rb, Na, and H; Ln = La, Pr, Nd, and Sm). J Mater Chem, 2003, 13(6), 1433 doi: 10.1039/b301938c
[68]
Yin J, Zou Z, Ye J. Photophysical and photocatalytic properties of MIn0.5Nb0.5O3 (M = Ca, Sr, and Ba). J Phys Chem B, 2003, 107(1), 61 doi: 10.1021/jp026403y
[69]
Dong B B, Cui J Y, Liu T F, et al. Development of novel perovskite-like oxide photocatalyst LiCuTa3O9 with dual functions of water reduction and oxidation under visible light irradiation. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8(35), 1801660 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201801660
[70]
Wang B, Kanhere P D, Chen Z, et al. Anion-doped NaTaO3 for visible light photocatalysis. J Phys Chem C, 2013, 117(44), 22518 doi: 10.1021/jp407025r
[71]
Li F F, Liu D R, Gao G M, et al. Improved visible-light photocatalytic activity of NaTaO3 with perovskite-like structure via sulfur anion doping. Appl Catal B, 2015, 166/167, 104 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.049
[72]
Yu H, Wang J J, Yan S C, et al. Elements doping to expand the light response of SrTiO3. J Photoch Photobio A, 2014, 275, 65 doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.10.014
[73]
Humayun M, Xu L, Zhou L, et al. Exceptional co-catalyst free photocatalytic activities of B and Fe co-doped SrTiO3 for CO2 conversion and H2 evolution. Nano Res, 2018, 11(12), 6391 doi: 10.1007/s12274-018-2164-z
[74]
Pan C, Takata T, Kumamoto K, et al. Band engineering of perovskite-type transition metal oxynitrides for photocatalytic overall water splitting. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4(12), 4544 doi: 10.1039/C5TA10612E
[75]
Shi J, Ye J, Zhou Z, et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of Na0.5La0.5TiO3-LaCrO3 solid-solution single-crystal nanocubes for visible-light-driven photocatalytic H2 evolution. Chem-Eur J, 2011, 17(28), 7858 doi: 10.1002/chem.201003755
[76]
Wang D, Kako T, Ye J. Efficient photocatalytic decomposition of acetaldehyde over a solid-solution perovskite (Ag0.75Sr0.25)(Nb0.75Ti0.25)O3 under visible-light irradiation. J Am Chem Soc, 2008, 130(9), 2724 doi: 10.1021/ja710805x
[77]
Luo W, Li Z, Jiang X, et al. Correlation between the band positions of (SrTiO3)1− x·(LaTiO2N)x solid solutions and photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2008, 10(44), 6717 doi: 10.1039/b803996h
[78]
Cho S, Jang J W, Zhang W, et al. Single-crystalline thin films for studying intrinsic properties of BiFeO3-SrTiO3 solid solution photoelectrodes in solar energy conversion. Chem Mater, 2015, 27(19), 6635 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02394
[79]
Lu L, Lv M, Wang D, et al. Efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production over solid solutions Sr1– xBi xTi1– xFexO3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5). Appl Catal B, 2017, 200, 412 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.035
[80]
Zhang G, Sun S, Jiang W, et al. A novel perovskite SrTiO3-Ba2FeNbO6 solid solution for visible light photocatalytic hydrogen production. Adv Energy Mater, 2017, 7(2), 1600932 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201600932
[81]
Li W, Jiang K, Li Z, et al. Origin of improved photoelectrochemical water splitting in mixed perovskite oxides. Adv Mater, 2018, 8(31), 1801972 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201801972
[82]
Martin D J, Umezawa N, Chen X, et al. Facet engineered Ag3PO4 for efficient water photooxidation. Energ Environ Sci, 2013, 6(11), 3380 doi: 10.1039/c3ee42260g
[83]
Martin D J, Qiu K, Shevlin S A, et al. Highly efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution from water using visible light and structure-controlled graphitic carbon nitride. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53(35), 9240 doi: 10.1002/anie.201403375
[84]
Ham Y, Hisatomi T, Goto Y, et al. Flux-mediated doping of SrTiO3 photocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4(8), 3027 doi: 10.1039/C5TA04843E
[85]
Mu L, Zhao Y, Li A, et al. Enhancing charge separation on high symmetry SrTiO3 exposed with anisotropic facets for photocatalytic water splitting. Energ Environ Sci, 2016, 9(7), 2463 doi: 10.1039/C6EE00526H
[86]
Zhong D L, Liu W W, Tan P F, et al. Insights into the synergy effect of anisotropic {001} and {230} facets of BaTiO3 nanocubes sensitized with CdSe quantum dots for photocatalytic water reduction. Appl Catal B, 2018, 227, 1 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.009
[87]
Qiao M, Liu J, Wang Y, et al. PdSeO3 monolayer: promising inorganic 2D photocatalyst for direct overall water splitting without using sacrificial reagents and cocatalysts. J Am Chem Soc, 2018, 140(38), 12256 doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07855
[88]
Chandrasekaran S, Kim E J, Chung J S, et al. Structurally tuned lead magnesium titanate perovskite as a photoelectrode material for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem Eng J, 2017, 309, 682 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.087
[89]
Parida K M, Reddy K H, Martha S, et al. Fabrication of nanocrystalline LaFeO3: An efficient sol-gel auto-combustion assisted visible light responsive photocatalyst for water decomposition. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2010, 35(22), 12161 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.029
[90]
Tijare S N, Joshi M V, Padole P S, et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen generation through water splitting on nano-crystalline LaFeO3 perovskite. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2012, 37(13), 10451 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.120
[91]
Lee C W, Kim D W, Cho I S, et al. Simple synthesis and characterization of SrSnO3 nanoparticles with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2012, 37(14), 10557 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.063
[92]
Klusackova M, Nebel R, Macounova K M, et al. Size control of the photo-electrochemical water splitting activity of SrTiO3 nano-cubes. Electrochimica Acta, 2019, 297, 215 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.185
[93]
Kudo A, Tanaka A, Domen K, et al. The effects of the calcination temperature of SrTiO3 powder on photocatalytic activities. J Catal, 1988, 111(2), 296 doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(88)90088-7
[94]
Grinberg I, West D V, Torres M, et al. Perovskite oxides for visible-light-absorbing ferroelectric and photovoltaic materials. Nature, 2013, 503(7477), 509 doi: 10.1038/nature12622
[95]
Yi H T, Choi T, Choi S G, et al. Mechanism of the switchable photovoltaic effect in ferroelectric BiFeO3. Adv Mater, 2011, 23(30), 3403 doi: 10.1002/adma.201100805
[96]
Bhatnagar A, Chaudhuri A R, Kim Y H, et al. Role of domain walls in the abnormal photovoltaic effect in BiFeO3. Nat Commun, 2013, 4, 2835 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3835
[97]
Cao D, Xu J, Fang L, et al. Interface effect on the photocurrent: A comparative study on Pt sandwiched (Bi3.7Nd0.3)Ti3O12 and Pb(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3 films. Appl Phys Lett, 2010, 96(19), 192101 doi: 10.1063/1.3427500
[98]
Wang C, Cao D, Zheng F, et al. Photocathodic behavior of ferroelectric Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 films decorated with silver nanoparticles. Chem Commun, 2013, 49(36), 3769 doi: 10.1039/c3cc38545k
[99]
Cao D, Wang Z, Nasori, et al. Switchable charge-transfer in the photoelectrochemical energy-conversion process of ferroelectric BiFeO3 photoelectrodes. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53(41), 11027 doi: 10.1002/anie.201406044
[100]
Song J, Kim T L, Lee J, et al. Domain-engineered BiFeO3 thin-film photoanodes for highly enhanced ferroelectric solar water splitting. Nano Res, 2018, 11(2), 642 doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1669-1
[101]
Wang Z, Cao D, Wen L, et al. Manipulation of charge transfer and transport in plasmonic-ferroelectric hybrids for photoelectrochemical applications. Nat Commun, 2016, 7, 10348 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10348
[102]
Shi J, Zhao P, Wang X. Piezoelectric-polarization-enhanced photovoltaic performance in depleted-heterojunction quantum-dot solar cells. Adv Mater, 2013, 25(6), 916 doi: 10.1002/adma.201203021
[103]
Huang X, Wang K, Wang Y, et al. Enhanced charge carrier separation to improve hydrogen production efficiency by ferroelectric spontaneous polarization electric field. Appl Catal B, 2018, 227, 322 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.036
[104]
Yang W, Yu Y, Starr M B, et al. Ferroelectric polarization-enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting in TiO2-BaTiO3 core-shell nanowire photoanodes. Nano Lett, 2015, 15(11), 7574 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03988
[105]
Li W, Wang F, Li M, et al. Polarization-dependent epitaxial growth and photocatalytic performance of ferroelectric oxide heterostructures. Nano Energy, 2018, 45, 304 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.002
[106]
Iyer A A, Ertekin E. Asymmetric response of ferroelectric/metal oxide heterojunctions for catalysis arising from interfacial chemistry. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2017, 19(8), 5870 doi: 10.1039/C6CP06700J
[107]
Lee J H, Selloni A. TiO2/ferroelectric heterostructures as dynamic polarization-promoted catalysts for photochemical and electrochemical oxidation of water. Phys Rev Lett, 2014, 112(19), 196102 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.196102
[108]
Xie J, Guo C, Yang P, et al. Bi-functional ferroelectric BiFeO3 passivated BiVO4 photoanode for efficient and stable solar water oxidation. Nano Energy, 2017, 31, 28 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.048
[109]
Low J, Yu J, Jaroniec M, et al. Heterojunction photocatalysts. Adv Mater, 2017, 29(20), 1601694 doi: 10.1002/adma.201601694
[110]
Li H, Zhou Y, Tu W, et al. State-of-the-art progress in diverse heterostructured photocatalysts toward promoting photocatalytic performance. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25(7), 998 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201401636
[111]
Nashim A, Parida K. n-La2Ti2O7/p-LaCrO3: a novel heterojunction based composite photocatalyst with enhanced photoactivity towards hydrogen production. J Mater Chem A, 2014, 2(43), 18405 doi: 10.1039/C4TA02401J
[112]
Xu X, Liu G, Randorn C, et al. g-C3N4 coated SrTiO3 as an efficient photocatalyst for H2 production in aqueous solution under visible light irradiation. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2011, 36(21), 13501 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.052
[113]
Kang H W, Lim S N, Song D, et al. Organic-inorganic composite of g-C3N4-SrTiO3:Rh photocatalyst for improved H2 evolution under visible light irradiation. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2012, 37(16), 11602 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.020
[114]
Opoku F, Govender K K, van Sittert C G C E, et al. Tuning the electronic structures, work functions, optical properties and stability of bifunctional hybrid graphene oxide/V-doped NaNbO3 type-II heterostructures: A promising photocatalyst for H2 production. Carbon, 2018, 136, 187 doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.076
[115]
Jia Q, Iwase A, Kudo A. BiVO4-Ru/SrTiO3:Rh composite Z-scheme photocatalyst for solar water splitting. Chem Sci, 2014, 5(4), 1513 doi: 10.1039/c3sc52810c
[116]
Dong C, Lu S, Yao S, et al. Colloidal synthesis of ultrathin monoclinic BiVO4 nanosheets for Z-scheme overall water splitting under visible light. ACS Catal, 2018, 8(9), 8649 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b01645
[117]
Ma Z, Li Y, Lv Y, et al. Synergistic effect of doping and compositing on photocatalytic efficiency: a case study of La2Ti2O7. ACS Appl Mater Inter, 2018, 10(45), 39327 doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b12178
[118]
Wei Y, Wang J, Yu R, et al. Constructing SrTiO3-TiO2 heterogeneous hollow multi-shelled structures for enhanced solar water splitting. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2019, 131(5), 1436 doi: 10.1002/ange.201812364
[119]
Chang Y, Yu K, Zhang C, et al. Ternary CdS/Au/3DOM-SrTiO3 composites with synergistic enhancement for hydrogen production from visible-light photocatalytic water splitting. Appl Catal B, 2017, 215, 74 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.054
[120]
Valenti M, Jonsson M P, Biskos G, et al. Plasmonic nanoparticle-semiconductor composites for efficient solar water splitting. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4(46), 17891 doi: 10.1039/C6TA06405A
[121]
Zhang P, Wang T, Gong J. Mechanistic understanding of the plasmonic enhancement for solar water splitting. Adv Mater, 2015, 27(36), 5328 doi: 10.1002/adma.201500888
[122]
Xu D, Yang S, Jin Y, et al. Ag-decorated ATaO3 (A = K, Na) nanocube plasmonic photocatalysts with enhanced photocatalytic water-splitting properties. Langmuir, 2015, 31(35), 9694 doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01294
[123]
Liu J, Sun Y, Li Z, et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen production from water/methanol solutions over highly ordered Ag-SrTiO3 nanotube arrays. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2011, 36(10), 5811 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.117
[124]
Lu D, Ouyang S, Xu H, et al. Designing Au surface-modified nanoporous-single-crystalline SrTiO3 to optimize diffusion of surface plasmon resonance-induce photoelectron toward enhanced visible-light photoactivity. ACS Appl Mater Inter, 2016, 8(14), 9506 doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b00889
[125]
Zhang B T, Liu J, Yue S, et al. Hot electron injection: an efficacious approach to charge LaCoO3 for improving the water splitting efficiency. Appl Catal B, 2017, 219, 432 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.033
[126]
Huang Y B, Liu J, Cao D W, et al. Separation of hot electrons and holes in Au/LaFeO3 to boost the photocatalytic activities both for water reduction and oxidation. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2019, 44(26), 13242 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.182
[127]
Cai X, Zhu M, Elbanna O A, et al. Au nanorod photosensitized La2Ti2O7 nanosteps: successive surface heterojunctions boosting visible to near-infrared photocatalytic H2 evolution. ACS Catal, 2018, 8(1), 122 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02972
[128]
Shi L, Zhou W, Li Z, et al. Periodically ordered nanoporous perovskite photoelectrode for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Nano, 2018, 12(6), 6335 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b03940
[129]
Zhong Y, Ueno K, Mori Y, et al. Plasmon-assisted water splitting using two sides of the same SrTiO3 single-crystal substrate: conversion of visible light to chemical energy. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53(39), 10350 doi: 10.1002/anie.201404926
[130]
Liu Q, Zhou Y, You L, et al. Enhanced ferroelectric photoelectrochemical properties of polycrystalline BiFeO3 film by decorating with Ag nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett, 2016, 108(2), 022902 doi: 10.1063/1.4939747
[131]
Huang Y L, Chang W S, Van C N, et al. Tunable photoelectrochemical performance of Au/BiFeO3 heterostructure. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(34), 15795 doi: 10.1039/C6NR04997D
[132]
Zhu M, Cai X, Fujitsuka M, et al. Au/La2Ti2O7 nanostructures sensitized with black phosphorus for plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production in visible and near-infrared light. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2017, 56(8), 2064 doi: 10.1002/anie.201612315
[133]
Liu J, Liu Y, Liu N, et al. Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway. Science, 2015, 347(6225), 970 doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3145
Fig. 1.  (Color online) (a) Schematic structure of cubic ABX3 perovskite unit cell, and (b) the extended tridimensional structure of perovskites formed by the corner-linked octahedral.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) Schematic illustration of the basic reaction mechanism of the overall water splitting on a semiconductor (a), and uphill reaction process of photocatalytic water splitting (b). Reprinted from Ref. [44].

Fig. 3.  (Color online) (a) Schematic illustration of water splitting using a TiO2 photoelectrode. Reprinted from Ref. [44]. (b) H-type glass container for the separate evolution of H2 and O2 using a TiO2 thin film photocatalyst device (TiO2 side, 1.0 M NaOH aqueous solutions; Pt side, 0.5 M H2SO4 aqueous solution). Reprinted from Ref. [54].

Fig. 4.  (Color online) Schematic illustration of the main processes of the photocatalytic overall water splitting reaction.

Fig. 5.  (Color online) Schematic illustration of (a) the band structure and (b) DOS (density of states) plots of LCTO, (c) typical time course of photocatalytic H2 evolution reaction, (d) photocatalytic O2 evolution rate as a function of the cutoff wavelength of incident light. Reprinted from Ref. [69].

Fig. 6.  (Color online) (a) Schematic diagram of band positions relative to the vacuum level and NHE for the BFO50-STO50 film. A, B, and C represent the photoexcited carriers relaxation and recombination processes. (b) Current density-potential curves of BFO, BFO75-STO25, BFO50-STO50, BFO25-STO75, and STO films. Reprinted from Ref. [81].

Fig. 7.  (Color online) The morphology engineering strategy for SrTiO3 nanocrystals. (a–c) The morphology of 6-facet SrTiO3 nanocrystals. (d) The structure of the {001} facet of SrTiO3. (e) The schematic description of changing SrTiO3 nanocrystals from 6-facet to 18-facet. (f–h) The morphology of 18-facet SrTiO3 nanocrystals. (i) The structure of the {110} facet of SrTiO3. Reprinted from Ref. [85].

Fig. 8.  (Color online) (a) UV–vis absorption spectra and (b) typical time course of photocatalytic H2 evolution reaction of c-NaNbO3 (cubic NaNbO3) and o-NaNbO3 (orthorhombic NaNbO3) samples. Reprinted from Ref. [31].

Fig. 9.  (Color online) (a) External quantum yield spectra measured for BFO electrodes before poling and after + 8 and –8 V poling. (b) Photocurrent-potential characteristics of the photoelectrodes with different polarization states. Schematic illustrations of the mechanisms in photoexcited charge transfer from BFO films to the electrolyte and from excited surface modifiers to the BFO films after the BFO films were (c) positively and (d) negatively poled. Reprinted from Ref. [99]. (e, f) Schematic electronic band structure and the mechanisms for the injected hot-electron transfer from PZT films to the electrolyte for the two poling configurations. Reprinted from Ref. [101].

Fig. 10.  (Color online) Schematic illustration of the (a) electron–hole separation of La2Ti2O7/LaCrO3 heterojunction and (b) g-C3N4/SrTiO3:Rh composite under visible light irradiation. Reprinted from Refs. [111, 113], respectively.

Fig. 11.  (Color online) (a) Synthesis route of SrTiO3/TiO2 HoMs from hydrothermal reaction. (b) Typical time course of photocatalytic H2 and O2 evolution reaction of triple shelled SrTiO3/TiO2 HoMs photocatalyst. (c) Possible band structure diagram for SrTiO3/TiO2 HoMs. Reprinted from Ref. [118].

Fig. 12.  (Color online) Schematic illustration of (a) the photogenerated charge transfer and catalytic reaction mechanisms of the fabricated LaCoO3/Au nano-composite (Reprinted from Ref. [125]), and (b) the prepared Au/LTO NSP. (c) The diffuse reflectance spectra (left axis, blue line) and apparent quantum efficiency (right axis, red column) of Au-LTO NSP under vis-NIR (λ > 420 nm) light irradiation. Reprinted from Ref. [127].

Fig. 13.  (Color online) (a) Schematics and cross-section of scanning electron microscope (SEM) of the fabricated ITO/PZT/Au, ITO/PZT/Au/PZT, and ITO/Au/PZT electrodes. (b) Top-view SEM image of nano-Au array fabricated on ITO glass; scale bar, 1 μm. The inset zooms in one part of the SEM; scale bar, 200 nm. (c) FDTD-simulated spatial distribution of the electric field intensity around the square dot illuminated by 800 nm light. (d) Photocurrent-potential measurements of ITO/nano-Au/PZT(black), ITO/PZT/nano-Au/PZT (red) and ITO/PZT/nano-Au (blue) under the white-light excitation (filtered, > 450 nm). (e) Photocurrent-potential measurements of the ITO/PZT/nano-Au/PZT (the as-grown (black), + 10 V (red) and –10 V (blue) poled) under the white-light excitation (filtered, > 450 nm). Reprinted from Ref. [101].

[1]
Hosseini S E, Wahid M A. Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 2016, 57, 850 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.112
[2]
Vita A, Italiano C, Pino L, et al. Hydrogen-rich gas production by steam reforming of n-dodecane. Part II: Stability, regenerability and sulfur poisoning of low loading Rh-based catalyst. Appl Catal B, 2017, 218, 317 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.059
[3]
Hisatomi T, Domen K. Reaction systems for solar hydrogen production via water splitting with particulate semiconductor photocatalysts. Nat Catal, 2019, 2(5), 387 doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0242-6
[4]
Wang W, Xu M, Xu X, et al. Perovskite oxide-based electrodes for high-performance photoelectrochemical water splitting. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2019, 58, 2 doi: 10.1002/anie.201900292
[5]
Chen G, Hu Z, Zhu Y, et al. A universal strategy to design superior water-splitting electrocatalysts based on fast in situ reconstruction of amorphous nanofilm precursors. Adv Mater, 2018, 30(43), 1804333 doi: 10.1002/adma.201804333
[6]
Zhang G, Liu G, Wang L Z, et al. Inorganic perovskite photocatalysts for solar energy utilization. Chem Soc Rev, 2016, 45(21), 5951 doi: 10.1039/C5CS00769K
[7]
Sheng X, Xu T, Feng X J. Rational design of photoelectrodes with rapid charge transport for photoelectrochemical applications. Adv Mater, 2019, 31(11), 1805132 doi: 10.1002/adma.201805132
[8]
Chen W J, Wang T T, Xue J W, et al. Cobalt-nickel layered double hydroxides modified on TiO2 nanotube arrays for highly efficient and stable PEC water splitting. Small, 2017, 13(10), 1602420 doi: 10.1002/smll.201602420
[9]
Faraji M, Yousefi M, Yousefzadeh S, et al. Two-dimensional materials in semiconductor photoelectrocatalytic systems for water splitting. Energ Environ Sci, 2019, 12(1), 59 doi: 10.1039/C8EE00886H
[10]
Huang X, Qi X Y, Boey F, et al. Graphene-based composites. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41(2), 666 doi: 10.1039/C1CS15078B
[11]
Li X, Liu S W, Fan K, et al. MOF-based transparent passivation layer modified ZnO nanorod arrays for enhanced photo-electrochemical water splitting. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8(18), 1800101 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201800101
[12]
Ong W J, Tan L L, Ng Y H, et al. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis and environmental remediation: are we a step closer to achieving sustainability. Chem Rev, 2016, 116(12), 7159 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075
[13]
Wang S C, Chen P, Bai Y, et al. New BiVO4 dual photoanodes with enriched oxygen vacancies for efficient solar-driven water splitting. Adv Mater, 2018, 30(20), 1800486 doi: 10.1002/adma.201800486
[14]
Xu Y F, Rao H S, Chen B X, et al. Achieving highly efficient photoelectrochemical water oxidation with a TiCl4 treated 3D antimony-doped SnO2 macropore/branched alpha-Fe2O3 nanorod heterojunction photoanode. Adv Sci, 2015, 2(7), 1500049 doi: 10.1002/advs.201500049
[15]
Yeh T F, Teng C Y, Chen L C, et al. Graphene oxide-based nanomaterials for efficient photoenergy conversion. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4(6), 2014 doi: 10.1039/C5TA07780J
[16]
Zhang Z M, Gao C T, W u Z M, et al. Toward efficient photoelectrochemical water-splitting by using screw-like SnO2 nanostructures as photoanode after being decorated with CdS quantum dots. Nano Energy, 2016, 19, 318 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.011
[17]
Zhou Y E, Zhang L Y, Lin L H, et al. Highly efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting from hierarchical WO3/BiVO4 nanoporous sphere arrays. Nano Lett, 2017, 17(12), 8012 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04626
[18]
Pinaud B A, Benck J D, Seitz L C, et al. Technical and economic feasibility of centralized facilities for solar hydrogen production via photocatalysis and photoelectrochemistry. Energ Environ Sci, 2013, 6(7), 1983 doi: 10.1039/c3ee40831k
[19]
Tan P, Liu M L, Shao Z P, et al. Recent advances in perovskite oxides as electrode materials for nonaqueous lithium-oxygen batteries. Adv Energy Mater, 2017, 7(13), 1602674 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201602674
[20]
Wang W, Tade M O, Shao Z P. Nitrogen-doped simple and complex oxides for photocatalysis: A review. Prog Mater Sci, 2018, 92, 33 doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.09.002
[21]
Pena M A, Fierro J L. Chemical structures and performance of perovskite oxides. Chem Rev, 2001, 101(7), 1981 doi: 10.1021/cr980129f
[22]
Suntivich J, May K J, Gasteiger H A, et al. A perovskite oxide optimized for oxygen evolution catalysis from molecular orbital principles. Science, 2011, 334(6061), 1383 doi: 10.1126/science.1212858
[23]
Hwang J, Rao R R, Giordano L, et al. Perovskites in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Science, 2017, 358(6364), 751 doi: 10.1126/science.aam7092
[24]
Cheng Z Y, Lin J. Layered organic-inorganic hybrid perovskites: structure, optical properties, film preparation, patterning and templating engineering. CrystEngComm, 2010, 12(10), 2646 doi: 10.1039/c001929a
[25]
Green M A, Ho-Baillie A, Snaith H J. The emergence of perovskite solar cells. Nat Photonics, 2014, 8(7), 506 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.134
[26]
Goldschmidt V M. Crystal structure and chemical correlation. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges, 1927, 60, 1263 doi: 10.1002/cber.19270600550
[27]
Wang W, Tade M O, Shao Z P. Research progress of perovskite materials in photocatalysis- and photovoltaics-related energy conversion and environmental treatment. Chem Soc Rev, 2015, 44(15), 5371 doi: 10.1039/C5CS00113G
[28]
Li C, Soh K C K, Wu P. Formability of ABO3 perovskites. J Alloy Compd, 2004, 372(1/2), 40 doi: 10.1016/S0925-8388(03)01146-0
[29]
Li C H, Lu X G, Ding W Z, et al. Formability of ABX3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) halide perovskites. Acta Crystallogr B, 2008, 64, 702 doi: 10.1107/S0108768108032734
[30]
Hu C C, Lee Y L, Teng H S. Efficient water splitting over Na1– xKxTaO3 photocatalysts with cubic perovskite structure. J Mater Chem, 2011, 21(11), 3824 doi: 10.1039/c0jm03451g
[31]
Li P, Ouyang S X, Xi G C, et al. The effects of crystal structure and electronic structure on photocatalytic H2 evolution and CO2 reduction over two phases of perovskite-structured NaNbO3. J Phys Chem C, 2012, 116(14), 7621 doi: 10.1021/jp210106b
[32]
Cohen R E. Origin of ferroelectricity in perovskite oxides. Nature, 1992, 358(6382), 136 doi: 10.1038/358136a0
[33]
Ohtomo A, Hwang H Y. A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface. Nature, 2004, 427(6973), 423 doi: 10.1038/nature02308
[34]
Reyren N, Thiel S, Caviglia A D, et al. Superconducting interfaces between insulating oxides. Science, 2007, 317(5842), 1196 doi: 10.1126/science.1146006
[35]
Jin S, Tiefel T H, McCormack M, et al. Thousandfold change in resistivity in magnetoresistive La–Ca–Mn–O films. Science, 1994, 264(5157), 413 doi: 10.1126/science.264.5157.413
[36]
Huang K, Tichy R S, Goodenough J B. Superior perovskite oxide-Ion conductor; strontium- and magnesium-doped LaGaO3:I, phase relationships and electrical properties. J Am Ceram Soc, 1998, 81(10), 2565 doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02662.x
[37]
Ibarra J. Influence of composition on the structure and conductivity of the fast ionic conductors La2/3− xLi3 xTiO3 (0.03 ≤ x ≤ 0.167). Solid State Ionics, 2000, 134(3/4), 219 doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00761-X
[38]
Chan K S, Ma J, Jaenicke S, et al. Catalytic carbon-monoxide oxidation over strontium, cerium and copper-substituted lanthanum manganates and cobaltates. Appl Catal A, 1994, 107(2), 201 doi: 10.1016/0926-860X(94)85156-5
[39]
Royer S, Duprez D, Can F, et al. Perovskites as substitutes of noble metals for heterogeneous catalysis: dream or reality. Chem Rev, 2014, 114(20), 10292 doi: 10.1021/cr500032a
[40]
Yin W J, Weng B, Ge J, et al. Oxide perovskites, double perovskites and derivatives for electrocatalysis, photocatalysis, and photovoltaics. Energ Environ Sci, 2019, 12(2), 442 doi: 10.1039/C8EE01574K
[41]
Mignard D, Batik R C, Bharadwaj A S, et al. Revisiting strontium-doped lanthanum cuprate perovskite for the electrochemical reduction of CO2. J CO2 Util, 2014, 5, 53 doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2013.12.006
[42]
Suntivich J, Gasteiger H A, Yabuuchi N, et al. Design principles for oxygen-reduction activity on perovskite oxide catalysts for fuel cells and metal-air batteries. Nat Chem, 2011, 3(7), 546 doi: 10.1038/nchem.1069
[43]
Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature, 1972, 238(5358), 37 doi: 10.1038/238037a0
[44]
Kudo A, Miseki Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem Soc Rev, 2009, 38(1), 253 doi: 10.1039/B800489G
[45]
Chen S S, Takata T, Domen K. Particulate photocatalysts for overall water splitting. Nat Rev Mater, 2017, 2(10), 17050 doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.50
[46]
Kim J H, Hansora D, Sharma P, et al. Toward practical solar hydrogen production-an artificial photosynthetic leaf-to-farm challenge. Chem Soc Rev, 2019, 48(7), 1908 doi: 10.1039/C8CS00699G
[47]
Yang M Q, Gao M M, Hong M H, et al. Visible-to-NIR photon harvesting: progressive engineering of catalysts for solar-powered environmental purification and fuel production. Adv Mater, 2018, 30(47), 1802894 doi: 10.1002/adma.201802894
[48]
Li X B, Tung C H, Wu L Z. Semiconducting quantum dots for artificial photosynthesis. Nat Rev Chem, 2018, 2(8), 160 doi: 10.1038/s41570-018-0024-8
[49]
Maeda K, Domen K. New non-oxide photocatalysts designed for overall water splitting under visible light. J Phys Chem C, 2007, 111(22), 7851 doi: 10.1021/jp070911w
[50]
Yerga R M N, Galvan M C A, del Valle F, et al. Water splitting on semiconductor catalysts under visible-light irradiation. ChemSusChem, 2009, 2(6), 471 doi: 10.1002/cssc.200900018
[51]
Pushkarev A P, Bochkarev M N. Organic electroluminescent materials and devices emitting in UV and NIR regions. Russ Chem Rev, 2016, 85(12), 1338 doi: 10.1070/RCR4665
[52]
Kang Z, Si H N, Zhang S C, et al. Interface engineering for modulation of charge carrier behavior in ZnO photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv Funct Mater, 2019, 29(15), 1808032 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201808032
[53]
Jiang C R, Moniz S J A, Wang A Q, et al. Photoelectrochemical devices for solar water splitting-materials and challenges. Chem Soc Rev, 2017, 46(15), 4645 doi: 10.1039/C6CS00306K
[54]
Kitano M, Takeuchi M, Matsuoka M, et al. Photocatalytic water splitting using Pt-loaded visible light-responsive TiO2 thin film photocatalysts. Catal Today, 2007, 120(2), 133 doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2006.07.043
[55]
Suen N T, Hung S F, Quan Q, et al. Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives. Chem Soc Rev, 2017, 46(2), 337 doi: 10.1039/C6CS00328A
[56]
Kanhere P, Chen Z. A review on visible light active perovskite-based photocatalysts. Molecules, 2014, 19(12), 19995 doi: 10.3390/molecules191219995
[57]
Moniruddin M, Ilyassov B, Zhao X, et al. Recent progress on perovskite materials in photovoltaic and water splitting applications. Mater Today Energy, 2018, 7, 246 doi: 10.1016/j.mtener.2017.10.005
[58]
Khan M A, Nadeem M A, Idrissn H. Ferroelectric polarization effect on surface chemistry and photo-catalytic activity: A review. Surf Sci Rep, 2016, 71(1), 1 doi: 10.1016/j.surfrep.2016.01.001
[59]
Konta R, Ishii T, Kato H, et al. Photocatalytic activities of noble metal ion doped SrTiO3 under visible light irradiation. J Phys Chem B, 2004, 108(26), 8992 doi: 10.1021/jp049556p
[60]
Ohno T, Tsubota T, Nakamura Y, et al. Preparation of S, C cation-codoped SrTiO3 and its photocatalytic activity under visible light. Appl Catal A, 2005, 288(1/2), 74 doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.04.035
[61]
Grabowska E. Selected perovskite oxides: characterization, preparation and photocatalytic properties-A review. Appl Catal B, 2016, 186, 97 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.035
[62]
Kawasaki M, Takahashi K, Maeda T, et al. Atomic control of the SrTiO3 crystal surface. Science, 1994, 266(5190), 1540 doi: 10.1126/science.266.5190.1540
[63]
Iwashina K, Kudo A. Rh-doped SrTiO3 photocatalyst electrode showing cathodic photocurrent for water splitting under visible-light irradiation. J Am Chem Soc, 2011, 133(34), 13272 doi: 10.1021/ja2050315
[64]
Shenoy U S, Bantawal H, Bhat D K. Band engineering of SrTiO3: effect of synthetic technique and site occupancy of doped rhodium. J Phys Chem C, 2018, 122(48), 27567 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10083
[65]
Umebayashi T, Yamaki T, Itoh H, et al. Analysis of electronic structures of 3d transition metal-doped TiO2 based on band calculations. J Phys Chem Solids, 2002, 63(10), 1909 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3697(02)00177-4
[66]
Zou J P, Zhang L Z, Luo S L, et al. Preparation and photocatalytic activities of two new Zn-doped SrTiO3 and BaTiO3 photocatalysts for hydrogen production from water without cocatalysts loading. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2012, 37(22), 17068 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.133
[67]
Machida M, Miyazaki K, Matsushima S, et al. Photocatalytic properties of layered perovskite tantalates, MLnTa2O7 (M = Cs, Rb, Na, and H; Ln = La, Pr, Nd, and Sm). J Mater Chem, 2003, 13(6), 1433 doi: 10.1039/b301938c
[68]
Yin J, Zou Z, Ye J. Photophysical and photocatalytic properties of MIn0.5Nb0.5O3 (M = Ca, Sr, and Ba). J Phys Chem B, 2003, 107(1), 61 doi: 10.1021/jp026403y
[69]
Dong B B, Cui J Y, Liu T F, et al. Development of novel perovskite-like oxide photocatalyst LiCuTa3O9 with dual functions of water reduction and oxidation under visible light irradiation. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8(35), 1801660 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201801660
[70]
Wang B, Kanhere P D, Chen Z, et al. Anion-doped NaTaO3 for visible light photocatalysis. J Phys Chem C, 2013, 117(44), 22518 doi: 10.1021/jp407025r
[71]
Li F F, Liu D R, Gao G M, et al. Improved visible-light photocatalytic activity of NaTaO3 with perovskite-like structure via sulfur anion doping. Appl Catal B, 2015, 166/167, 104 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.049
[72]
Yu H, Wang J J, Yan S C, et al. Elements doping to expand the light response of SrTiO3. J Photoch Photobio A, 2014, 275, 65 doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.10.014
[73]
Humayun M, Xu L, Zhou L, et al. Exceptional co-catalyst free photocatalytic activities of B and Fe co-doped SrTiO3 for CO2 conversion and H2 evolution. Nano Res, 2018, 11(12), 6391 doi: 10.1007/s12274-018-2164-z
[74]
Pan C, Takata T, Kumamoto K, et al. Band engineering of perovskite-type transition metal oxynitrides for photocatalytic overall water splitting. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4(12), 4544 doi: 10.1039/C5TA10612E
[75]
Shi J, Ye J, Zhou Z, et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of Na0.5La0.5TiO3-LaCrO3 solid-solution single-crystal nanocubes for visible-light-driven photocatalytic H2 evolution. Chem-Eur J, 2011, 17(28), 7858 doi: 10.1002/chem.201003755
[76]
Wang D, Kako T, Ye J. Efficient photocatalytic decomposition of acetaldehyde over a solid-solution perovskite (Ag0.75Sr0.25)(Nb0.75Ti0.25)O3 under visible-light irradiation. J Am Chem Soc, 2008, 130(9), 2724 doi: 10.1021/ja710805x
[77]
Luo W, Li Z, Jiang X, et al. Correlation between the band positions of (SrTiO3)1− x·(LaTiO2N)x solid solutions and photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2008, 10(44), 6717 doi: 10.1039/b803996h
[78]
Cho S, Jang J W, Zhang W, et al. Single-crystalline thin films for studying intrinsic properties of BiFeO3-SrTiO3 solid solution photoelectrodes in solar energy conversion. Chem Mater, 2015, 27(19), 6635 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02394
[79]
Lu L, Lv M, Wang D, et al. Efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production over solid solutions Sr1– xBi xTi1– xFexO3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5). Appl Catal B, 2017, 200, 412 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.035
[80]
Zhang G, Sun S, Jiang W, et al. A novel perovskite SrTiO3-Ba2FeNbO6 solid solution for visible light photocatalytic hydrogen production. Adv Energy Mater, 2017, 7(2), 1600932 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201600932
[81]
Li W, Jiang K, Li Z, et al. Origin of improved photoelectrochemical water splitting in mixed perovskite oxides. Adv Mater, 2018, 8(31), 1801972 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201801972
[82]
Martin D J, Umezawa N, Chen X, et al. Facet engineered Ag3PO4 for efficient water photooxidation. Energ Environ Sci, 2013, 6(11), 3380 doi: 10.1039/c3ee42260g
[83]
Martin D J, Qiu K, Shevlin S A, et al. Highly efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution from water using visible light and structure-controlled graphitic carbon nitride. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53(35), 9240 doi: 10.1002/anie.201403375
[84]
Ham Y, Hisatomi T, Goto Y, et al. Flux-mediated doping of SrTiO3 photocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4(8), 3027 doi: 10.1039/C5TA04843E
[85]
Mu L, Zhao Y, Li A, et al. Enhancing charge separation on high symmetry SrTiO3 exposed with anisotropic facets for photocatalytic water splitting. Energ Environ Sci, 2016, 9(7), 2463 doi: 10.1039/C6EE00526H
[86]
Zhong D L, Liu W W, Tan P F, et al. Insights into the synergy effect of anisotropic {001} and {230} facets of BaTiO3 nanocubes sensitized with CdSe quantum dots for photocatalytic water reduction. Appl Catal B, 2018, 227, 1 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.009
[87]
Qiao M, Liu J, Wang Y, et al. PdSeO3 monolayer: promising inorganic 2D photocatalyst for direct overall water splitting without using sacrificial reagents and cocatalysts. J Am Chem Soc, 2018, 140(38), 12256 doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07855
[88]
Chandrasekaran S, Kim E J, Chung J S, et al. Structurally tuned lead magnesium titanate perovskite as a photoelectrode material for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem Eng J, 2017, 309, 682 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.087
[89]
Parida K M, Reddy K H, Martha S, et al. Fabrication of nanocrystalline LaFeO3: An efficient sol-gel auto-combustion assisted visible light responsive photocatalyst for water decomposition. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2010, 35(22), 12161 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.029
[90]
Tijare S N, Joshi M V, Padole P S, et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen generation through water splitting on nano-crystalline LaFeO3 perovskite. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2012, 37(13), 10451 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.120
[91]
Lee C W, Kim D W, Cho I S, et al. Simple synthesis and characterization of SrSnO3 nanoparticles with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2012, 37(14), 10557 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.063
[92]
Klusackova M, Nebel R, Macounova K M, et al. Size control of the photo-electrochemical water splitting activity of SrTiO3 nano-cubes. Electrochimica Acta, 2019, 297, 215 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.185
[93]
Kudo A, Tanaka A, Domen K, et al. The effects of the calcination temperature of SrTiO3 powder on photocatalytic activities. J Catal, 1988, 111(2), 296 doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(88)90088-7
[94]
Grinberg I, West D V, Torres M, et al. Perovskite oxides for visible-light-absorbing ferroelectric and photovoltaic materials. Nature, 2013, 503(7477), 509 doi: 10.1038/nature12622
[95]
Yi H T, Choi T, Choi S G, et al. Mechanism of the switchable photovoltaic effect in ferroelectric BiFeO3. Adv Mater, 2011, 23(30), 3403 doi: 10.1002/adma.201100805
[96]
Bhatnagar A, Chaudhuri A R, Kim Y H, et al. Role of domain walls in the abnormal photovoltaic effect in BiFeO3. Nat Commun, 2013, 4, 2835 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3835
[97]
Cao D, Xu J, Fang L, et al. Interface effect on the photocurrent: A comparative study on Pt sandwiched (Bi3.7Nd0.3)Ti3O12 and Pb(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3 films. Appl Phys Lett, 2010, 96(19), 192101 doi: 10.1063/1.3427500
[98]
Wang C, Cao D, Zheng F, et al. Photocathodic behavior of ferroelectric Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 films decorated with silver nanoparticles. Chem Commun, 2013, 49(36), 3769 doi: 10.1039/c3cc38545k
[99]
Cao D, Wang Z, Nasori, et al. Switchable charge-transfer in the photoelectrochemical energy-conversion process of ferroelectric BiFeO3 photoelectrodes. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53(41), 11027 doi: 10.1002/anie.201406044
[100]
Song J, Kim T L, Lee J, et al. Domain-engineered BiFeO3 thin-film photoanodes for highly enhanced ferroelectric solar water splitting. Nano Res, 2018, 11(2), 642 doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1669-1
[101]
Wang Z, Cao D, Wen L, et al. Manipulation of charge transfer and transport in plasmonic-ferroelectric hybrids for photoelectrochemical applications. Nat Commun, 2016, 7, 10348 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10348
[102]
Shi J, Zhao P, Wang X. Piezoelectric-polarization-enhanced photovoltaic performance in depleted-heterojunction quantum-dot solar cells. Adv Mater, 2013, 25(6), 916 doi: 10.1002/adma.201203021
[103]
Huang X, Wang K, Wang Y, et al. Enhanced charge carrier separation to improve hydrogen production efficiency by ferroelectric spontaneous polarization electric field. Appl Catal B, 2018, 227, 322 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.036
[104]
Yang W, Yu Y, Starr M B, et al. Ferroelectric polarization-enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting in TiO2-BaTiO3 core-shell nanowire photoanodes. Nano Lett, 2015, 15(11), 7574 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03988
[105]
Li W, Wang F, Li M, et al. Polarization-dependent epitaxial growth and photocatalytic performance of ferroelectric oxide heterostructures. Nano Energy, 2018, 45, 304 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.002
[106]
Iyer A A, Ertekin E. Asymmetric response of ferroelectric/metal oxide heterojunctions for catalysis arising from interfacial chemistry. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2017, 19(8), 5870 doi: 10.1039/C6CP06700J
[107]
Lee J H, Selloni A. TiO2/ferroelectric heterostructures as dynamic polarization-promoted catalysts for photochemical and electrochemical oxidation of water. Phys Rev Lett, 2014, 112(19), 196102 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.196102
[108]
Xie J, Guo C, Yang P, et al. Bi-functional ferroelectric BiFeO3 passivated BiVO4 photoanode for efficient and stable solar water oxidation. Nano Energy, 2017, 31, 28 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.048
[109]
Low J, Yu J, Jaroniec M, et al. Heterojunction photocatalysts. Adv Mater, 2017, 29(20), 1601694 doi: 10.1002/adma.201601694
[110]
Li H, Zhou Y, Tu W, et al. State-of-the-art progress in diverse heterostructured photocatalysts toward promoting photocatalytic performance. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25(7), 998 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201401636
[111]
Nashim A, Parida K. n-La2Ti2O7/p-LaCrO3: a novel heterojunction based composite photocatalyst with enhanced photoactivity towards hydrogen production. J Mater Chem A, 2014, 2(43), 18405 doi: 10.1039/C4TA02401J
[112]
Xu X, Liu G, Randorn C, et al. g-C3N4 coated SrTiO3 as an efficient photocatalyst for H2 production in aqueous solution under visible light irradiation. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2011, 36(21), 13501 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.052
[113]
Kang H W, Lim S N, Song D, et al. Organic-inorganic composite of g-C3N4-SrTiO3:Rh photocatalyst for improved H2 evolution under visible light irradiation. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2012, 37(16), 11602 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.020
[114]
Opoku F, Govender K K, van Sittert C G C E, et al. Tuning the electronic structures, work functions, optical properties and stability of bifunctional hybrid graphene oxide/V-doped NaNbO3 type-II heterostructures: A promising photocatalyst for H2 production. Carbon, 2018, 136, 187 doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.076
[115]
Jia Q, Iwase A, Kudo A. BiVO4-Ru/SrTiO3:Rh composite Z-scheme photocatalyst for solar water splitting. Chem Sci, 2014, 5(4), 1513 doi: 10.1039/c3sc52810c
[116]
Dong C, Lu S, Yao S, et al. Colloidal synthesis of ultrathin monoclinic BiVO4 nanosheets for Z-scheme overall water splitting under visible light. ACS Catal, 2018, 8(9), 8649 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b01645
[117]
Ma Z, Li Y, Lv Y, et al. Synergistic effect of doping and compositing on photocatalytic efficiency: a case study of La2Ti2O7. ACS Appl Mater Inter, 2018, 10(45), 39327 doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b12178
[118]
Wei Y, Wang J, Yu R, et al. Constructing SrTiO3-TiO2 heterogeneous hollow multi-shelled structures for enhanced solar water splitting. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2019, 131(5), 1436 doi: 10.1002/ange.201812364
[119]
Chang Y, Yu K, Zhang C, et al. Ternary CdS/Au/3DOM-SrTiO3 composites with synergistic enhancement for hydrogen production from visible-light photocatalytic water splitting. Appl Catal B, 2017, 215, 74 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.054
[120]
Valenti M, Jonsson M P, Biskos G, et al. Plasmonic nanoparticle-semiconductor composites for efficient solar water splitting. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4(46), 17891 doi: 10.1039/C6TA06405A
[121]
Zhang P, Wang T, Gong J. Mechanistic understanding of the plasmonic enhancement for solar water splitting. Adv Mater, 2015, 27(36), 5328 doi: 10.1002/adma.201500888
[122]
Xu D, Yang S, Jin Y, et al. Ag-decorated ATaO3 (A = K, Na) nanocube plasmonic photocatalysts with enhanced photocatalytic water-splitting properties. Langmuir, 2015, 31(35), 9694 doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01294
[123]
Liu J, Sun Y, Li Z, et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen production from water/methanol solutions over highly ordered Ag-SrTiO3 nanotube arrays. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2011, 36(10), 5811 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.117
[124]
Lu D, Ouyang S, Xu H, et al. Designing Au surface-modified nanoporous-single-crystalline SrTiO3 to optimize diffusion of surface plasmon resonance-induce photoelectron toward enhanced visible-light photoactivity. ACS Appl Mater Inter, 2016, 8(14), 9506 doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b00889
[125]
Zhang B T, Liu J, Yue S, et al. Hot electron injection: an efficacious approach to charge LaCoO3 for improving the water splitting efficiency. Appl Catal B, 2017, 219, 432 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.033
[126]
Huang Y B, Liu J, Cao D W, et al. Separation of hot electrons and holes in Au/LaFeO3 to boost the photocatalytic activities both for water reduction and oxidation. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2019, 44(26), 13242 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.182
[127]
Cai X, Zhu M, Elbanna O A, et al. Au nanorod photosensitized La2Ti2O7 nanosteps: successive surface heterojunctions boosting visible to near-infrared photocatalytic H2 evolution. ACS Catal, 2018, 8(1), 122 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02972
[128]
Shi L, Zhou W, Li Z, et al. Periodically ordered nanoporous perovskite photoelectrode for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Nano, 2018, 12(6), 6335 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b03940
[129]
Zhong Y, Ueno K, Mori Y, et al. Plasmon-assisted water splitting using two sides of the same SrTiO3 single-crystal substrate: conversion of visible light to chemical energy. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53(39), 10350 doi: 10.1002/anie.201404926
[130]
Liu Q, Zhou Y, You L, et al. Enhanced ferroelectric photoelectrochemical properties of polycrystalline BiFeO3 film by decorating with Ag nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett, 2016, 108(2), 022902 doi: 10.1063/1.4939747
[131]
Huang Y L, Chang W S, Van C N, et al. Tunable photoelectrochemical performance of Au/BiFeO3 heterostructure. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(34), 15795 doi: 10.1039/C6NR04997D
[132]
Zhu M, Cai X, Fujitsuka M, et al. Au/La2Ti2O7 nanostructures sensitized with black phosphorus for plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production in visible and near-infrared light. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2017, 56(8), 2064 doi: 10.1002/anie.201612315
[133]
Liu J, Liu Y, Liu N, et al. Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway. Science, 2015, 347(6225), 970 doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3145
1

Electromechanical and photoelectric properties of a novel semiconducting Janus InGaSSe monolayer

Li Zhong, Xiaobao Li, Wei Wang, Xinle Xiao

Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(1): 012701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/1/012701

2

State-of-the-art advances in vacancy defect engineering of graphitic carbon nitride for solar water splitting

Jie Li, Kaige Huang, Yanbin Huang, Yumin Ye, Marcin Ziółek, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(8): 081701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/8/081701

3

Recent development in electronic structure tuning of graphitic carbon nitride for highly efficient photocatalysis

Chao Li, Jie Li, Yanbin Huang, Jun Liu, Mengmeng Ma, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(2): 021701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/2/021701

4

Simulation and application of external quantum efficiency of solar cells based on spectroscopy

Guanlin Chen, Can Han, Lingling Yan, Yuelong Li, Ying Zhao, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(12): 122701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/12/122701

5

Surface passivation of perovskite film for efficient solar cells

Yang (Michael) Yang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(4): 040204. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/4/040204

6

Rational molecular passivation for high-performance perovskite light-emitting diodes

Jingbi You

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(4): 040203. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/4/040203

7

Improved efficiency and photo-stability of methylamine-free perovskite solar cells via cadmium doping

Yong Chen, Yang Zhao, Qiufeng Ye, Zema Chu, Zhigang Yin, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(12): 122201. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/12/122201

8

Materials and applications of bioresorbable electronics

Xian Huang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(1): 011003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/1/011003

9

Flexible devices: from materials, architectures to applications

Mingzhi Zou, Yue Ma, Xin Yuan, Yi Hu, Jie Liu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(1): 011010. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/1/011010

10

Large area perovskite solar cell module

Longhua Cai, Lusheng Liang, Jifeng Wu, Bin Ding, Lili Gao, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(1): 014006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/1/014006

11

ZnO1-xTex and ZnO1-xSx semiconductor alloys as competent materials for opto-electronic and solar cell applications:a comparative analysis

Utsa Das, Partha P. Pal

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(8): 082001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/8/082001

12

Improving the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 via hybridizing with graphene

K S Divya, Athulya K Madhu, T U Umadevi, T Suprabha, P. Radhakrishnan Nair, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(6): 063002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/6/063002

13

Research progress of Si-based germanium materials and devices

Buwen Cheng, Cheng Li, Zhi Liu, Chunlai Xue

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(8): 081001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/8/081001

14

Photodetectors based on two dimensional materials

Zheng Lou, Zhongzhu Liang, Guozhen Shen

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(9): 091001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/9/091001

15

Comment on Chen et al. "Fabrication and photovoltaic conversion enhancement of graphene/n-Si Schottky barrier solar cells by electrophoretic deposition", Electrochimica Acta, 2014

Lara Valentic, Nima E. Gorji

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(9): 094012. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/9/094012

16

Radiation effect on the optical and electrical properties of CdSe(In)/p-Si heterojunction photovoltaic solar cells

M. Ashry, S. Fares

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(10): 102001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/10/102001

17

Physical properties of hematite α-Fe2O3 thin films: application to photoelectrochemical solar cells

S. S. Shinde, R. A. Bansode, C. H. Bhosale, K. Y. Rajpure

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(1): 013001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/1/013001

18

Performance analysis of solar cell arrays in concentrating light intensity

Xu Yongfeng, Li Ming, Wang Liuling, Lin Wenxian, Xiang Ming, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 084011. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/084011

19

Status and Trends in Advanced SOI Devices and Materials

Balestra Francis

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(4): 573-582.

20

Status and Trends in Advanced SOI Devices and Materials

Wang Tianxing, Wei Hongxiang, Ren Cong, Han Xiufeng, Clifford E, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(4): 591-597.

1. Jung, S.-C., Chung, K.-H. Assessment of photocatalytic activity of novel PrBiFeO3 perovskite composites in visible-light photocatalytic decomposition reaction. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jes.2025.02.033
2. Nkwachukwu, O.V., Arotiba, O.A. A perovskite/spinel structured LaFeO3/Co3O4 heterojunction for photoelectrocatalytic applications in degradation of tetracycline and water splitting. Journal of Power Sources, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236790
3. Chung, K.-H., Jung, S.-C. Hydrogen production from waste solution through liquid plasma cracking on perovskite composite catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.042
4. Jayapandi, S., Aditya, D.S., Mahadevaprasad, K.N. et al. LaCoO3 photocatalyst for environmental remediation and energy conversion applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115464
5. Rahman, A., Abid, A., Haneef, M. et al. Probing the role of silver and gold based double perovskite halide oxides for optoelectronic and photocatalytic applications. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2025.109367
6. Sandhu, Z.A., Ghaffar, S., Raza, M.A. et al. Advancements in metal selenide nanocomposites for efficient photocatalytic water splitting applications. Fuel, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133734
7. Tey, Q.Y., Soo, J.Z., Ng, W.C. et al. Next-generation perovskite-metal-organic framework (MOF) hybrids in photoelectrochemical water splitting: a path to green hydrogen solutions. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2025, 13(13): 9005-9038. doi:10.1039/d4ta09139f
8. Li, X., Zhang, C., Geng, J. et al. Photo(electro)catalytic Water Splitting for Hydrogen Production: Mechanism, Design, Optimization, and Economy. Molecules, 2025, 30(3): 630. doi:10.3390/molecules30030630
9. Madan, K., Rao, H.S., Harikrishna, R.B. et al. N-doped Ti3+ rich SrTiO3 for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Catalysis Today, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2024.115055
10. Kumar, R., Mehta, S., Thakur, R. et al. Progress in Perovskite Oxide Electrocatalysts for Efficient Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution Reactions. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, 2025. doi:10.1007/s10904-025-03778-5
11. Jung, S.-C., You, C.-S., Chung, K.-H. Assessment of the Productivity of Hydrogen and Nano-Carbon Through Liquid-Plasma Cracking of Waste Organic Solvent Using PrxNiyFeO3 Perovskite Catalysts. Processes, 2024, 12(12): 2932. doi:10.3390/pr12122932
12. Akenoun, B., Dahbi, S., Ez-Zahraouy, H. et al. The vacancy-ordered halide double perovskite Cs2B1−xTixI6 (B = Zr, Hf) for photovoltaic and photocatalytic hydrogen production by splitting water applications: First-principal calculations. Inorganic Chemistry Communications, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.inoche.2024.113260
13. Park, B.-G.. Fabrication of a new nickel iron-titanate perovskite composite with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Transition Metal Chemistry, 2024, 49(6): 439-452. doi:10.1007/s11243-024-00595-6
14. Gunatilleke, W.D.C.B., Ojo, O.P., Nolas, G.S. Origin of anisotropic thermal transport in CsPbBr3. Chemical Communications, 2024, 60(96): 14200-14203. doi:10.1039/d4cc05037a
15. Al-Gamal, A.G., Yehia, F., Elmasry, M.R. et al. Perovskite materials for hydrogen evolution: Processes, challenges and future perspectives. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.039
16. Ghani, M.U., Sagir, M., Tahir, M.B. et al. Evaluation of structural, electronic, optical, mechanical, and thermodynamic properties of LiXCl3 (X = Sn, Pb) for solar cell applications: first-principles approach. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 2024, 56(8): 1292. doi:10.1007/s11082-024-07212-x
17. Parwaiz, S., Khan, M.M. Perovskites and perovskite-based heterostructures for photocatalytic energy and environmental applications. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2024, 12(4): 113175. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2024.113175
18. Can Özcan, E., Uner, D., Yildirim, R. Effects of dead volume and inert sweep gas flow on photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over Pt/TiO2. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.03.218
19. Drdanová, A.P., Krajčovičová, T.E., Gál, M. et al. Unveiling Versatile Applications and Toxicity Considerations of Graphitic Carbon Nitride. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024, 25(14): 7634. doi:10.3390/ijms25147634
20. Shen, X., Kong, J., Wang, F. et al. Effects of metal chloride on promoting the emission efficiency and stability of 2D CsPb2(ClBr)5 perovskite nanocrystals and their application. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2024, 35(19): 1313. doi:10.1007/s10854-024-13012-6
21. Armendariz, S.F., Herrera-Perez, G.M., Zaragoza-Galan, G. Band Gap Narrowing of Orthorhombic Sodium Tantalate by Iron Doping and Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution by Water Splitting. Catalysis Letters, 2024, 154(7): 3236-3250. doi:10.1007/s10562-023-04546-1
22. Yasmeen, M., Batool, S.A., Shah, S.I.A. et al. Effective development and utilization of SILAR-assisted TiO2 and CsPb2Br5 nanocomposites for photochemical and biological cleaning of environment. Ceramics International, 2024, 50(12): 21253-21264. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.03.234
23. Ali, M., Sharma, K., Guin, D. et al. BaTiO3/rGO nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode for electrochemical sensing of 4‑nitrophenol and dopamine in real samples. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2024, 54(6): 1349-1363. doi:10.1007/s10800-023-02036-1
24. Dongre, S.S., Shwetharani, R., Balakrishna, R.G. Perovskite Oxynitrides and Oxysulfides toward Photocatalytic Green Hydrogen Production: Scalability Prospects. ACS Symposium Series, 2024. doi:10.1021/bk-2024-1467.ch004
25. Rogé, V., Garlisi, C., Popa, P.L. et al. SrTiO3 thin film photoanodes fabricated by combinatorial chemical beam vapour deposition: intricate connection between elemental composition and thin films' properties. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2024, 12(25): 15227-15239. doi:10.1039/d3ta07695d
26. Celestine, L., Zosiamliana, R., Gurung, S. et al. Structural phase transition, electronic and mechanical properties of NaVO3: a density functional theory study. Advances in Nanostructures: Processing and Methodology to Grow Nanostructures, 2024. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-13819-5.00011-2
27. Gul, H., Raza, W., Hussain, A. et al. Nanostructured semiconductors for hydrogen production through photocatalyatic water splitting. Handbook of Emerging Materials for Sustainable Energy, 2024. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-96125-7.00022-8
28. Li, P., Kowalczyk, D., Liessem, J. et al. Optimizing reaction conditions for the light-driven hydrogen evolution in a loop photoreactor. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2024. doi:10.3762/bjoc.20.9
29. Yu, L.-Q., Guo, R.-T., Guo, S.-H. et al. Research progress on photocatalytic reduction of CO2 based on ferroelectric materials. Nanoscale, 2023, 16(3): 1058-1079. doi:10.1039/d3nr05018a
30. Choukchou Braham, Z., Kermad, A., El Korso, S. et al. Enhancing structural properties of simple perovskite materials based on zirconate and titanate prepared by sol-gel method. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128460
31. Li, J., Huang, K., Huang, Y. et al. State-of-the-art advances in vacancy defect engineering of graphitic carbon nitride for solar water splitting. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(8): 081701. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/44/8/081701
32. Sahin, N.E., Pech-Rodríguez, W.J., Meléndez-González, P.C. et al. Water Splitting as an Alternative for Electrochemical Hydrogen and Oxygen Generation: Current Status, Trends, and Challenges. Energies, 2023, 16(13): 5078. doi:10.3390/en16135078
33. Ghose, K.K., Brown, J.J., Frankcombe, T.J. et al. Density functional theory modeling of critical properties of perovskite oxides for water splitting applications. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 2023, 12(4): e476. doi:10.1002/wene.476
34. Ayub, S., Siddique, A., Khalil, A. et al. An extensive investigation of structural, electronic, optical, magnetic, and mechanical properties of YGaO3 for photovoltaic and optoelectronic applications: First-principles approach. Inorganic Chemistry Communications, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.inoche.2023.110754
35. Chao, X., Yan, C., Zhao, H. et al. Micro-nano structural electrode architecture for high power energy storage. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(5): 050201. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/44/5/050201
36. Ayub, S., Khalil, A., Shaheen, R. et al. First-principles calculations to investigate structural, elastic, electronic, optical, and magnetic properties of Hg2WO4 for photocatalytic applications. Optik, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.170565
37. Ye, X., Liu, A., Gao, L. et al. Computational screening of Cs based vacancy-ordered double perovskites for solar cell and photocatalysis applications. EcoMat, 2023, 5(3): e12295. doi:10.1002/eom2.12295
38. Hu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhou, W. et al. Studies on Perovskite Material and Its Applications via Machine Learning | [基于机器学习探索钙钛矿材料及其应用]. Kuei Suan Jen Hsueh Pao/Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 51(2): 452-468. doi:10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20220776
39. Zhang, H., Ji, X., Xu, H. et al. Design and modification of perovskite materials for photocatalytic performance improvement. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2023, 11(1): 109056. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2022.109056
40. Molak, A.. Visible–Near-Infrared Diffuse Reflectance and Optical Energy Gap of Sodium Niobate Modified by Mn Ions: Na(Nb1−zMnz)O3 and (Na1−xBix)(Nb1−yMny)O3 Compounds Study. Physica Status Solidi (B) Basic Research, 2023, 260(2): 2200163. doi:10.1002/pssb.202200163
41. Phani Chandra, N.V., Hamdan, M., Chandiran, A.K. Stable Cs2ReX6 (X - Cl, Br) vacancy-ordered perovskites for solar water splitting. Sustainable Energy and Fuels, 2023, 7(4): 949-955. doi:10.1039/d2se01281b
42. Tan, W.. A Review of The Application of Cellulose and Fiber Derivatives in Perovskite Solar Cells. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. doi:10.1117/12.2687049
43. Chuangchote, S., Roongraung, K. Perovskite Materials for Hydrogen Production. Materials for Hydrogen Production, Conversion, and Storage, 2023. doi:10.1002/9781119829584.ch18
44. Tarasova, N.. Layered Perovskites BaLnnInnO3n+1 (n = 1, 2) for Electrochemical Applications: A Mini Review. Membranes, 2023, 13(1): 34. doi:10.3390/membranes13010034
45. Paramanik, L., Subudhi, S., Parida, K.M. Visible light active titanate perovskites: An overview on its synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic applications. Materials Research Bulletin, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2022.111965
46. Wang, S., Bao, Y., Qi, Y. et al. Defect Management of SrNbO2N through Zn Modification for Promoted Photocatalytic Water Oxidation. Energy and Fuels, 2022, 36(19): 11477-11484. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c00226
47. Tarasova, N., Bedarkova, A., Animitsa, I. Proton Transport in the Gadolinium-Doped Layered Perovskite BaLaInO4. Materials, 2022, 15(20): 7351. doi:10.3390/ma15207351
48. Tarasova, N., Bedarkova, A., Animitsa, I. et al. Oxygen Ion and Proton Transport in Alkali-Earth Doped Layered Perovskites Based on BaLa2In2O7. Inorganics, 2022, 10(10): 161. doi:10.3390/inorganics10100161
49. Pattanayak, P., Singh, P., Bansal, N.K. et al. Recent progress in perovskite transition metal oxide-based photocatalyst and photoelectrode materials for solar-driven water splitting. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10(5): 108429. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2022.108429
50. Man, S., Leng, X., Bai, J. et al. Facile synthesis of BiFeO3/Bi2O3 composite photocathode with improved photoelectrochemical performance. Materials Letters, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2022.132591
51. Wang, G., Chang, J., Tang, W. et al. 2D materials and heterostructures for photocatalytic water-splitting: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2022, 55(29): 293002. doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ac5771
52. Mishra, R., Bera, S., Chatterjee, R. et al. A review on Z/S – scheme heterojunction for photocatalytic applications based on metal halide perovskite materials. Applied Surface Science Advances, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.apsadv.2022.100241
53. Qasrawi, A.F., Baniowdah, T.S., Abu Samen, L.O. Au Nanosheets-Assisted Structural Phase Transitions, In Situ Monitoring of the Enhanced Crystallinity, and Their Effect on the Optical and Dielectric Properties of CuSe/Au/CuSe Thin Films. Crystal Research and Technology, 2022, 57(6): 2100237. doi:10.1002/crat.202100237
54. Li, Y., Li, L., She, S. et al. Multidimensional Perovskite for Visible Light Driven Hydrogen Production in Aqueous HI Solution. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2022, 5(1): 207-213. doi:10.1021/acsaem.1c02751
55. Müller, L., Hornig, P., Grabow, J. et al. Preparation of SrTiO3nanocubes by CO2laser vaporization (LAVA) and hydrothermal maturation. Nanoscale Advances, 2022, 4(1): 182-189. doi:10.1039/d1na00685a
56. Djellabi, R., Ordonez, M.F., Conte, F. et al. A review of advances in multifunctional XTiO3 perovskite-type oxides as piezo-photocatalysts for environmental remediation and energy production. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126792
57. Yin, Z., Hu, M., Liu, J. et al. Tunable crystal structure of Cu-Zn-Sn-S nanocrystals for improving photocatalytic hydrogen evolution enabled by copper element regulation. Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(3): 032701. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/43/3/032701
58. Li, C., Li, J., Huang, Y. et al. Recent development in electronic structure tuning of graphitic carbon nitride for highly efficient photocatalysis. Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(2): 021701. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/43/2/021701
59. Cao, D., Li, M., Zhu, J. et al. Enhancement of photoelectrochemical performance in ferroelectric films via the introduction of an Au buffer layer. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(11): 112701. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/42/11/112701
60. Zhang, P., Liang, H., Liu, H. et al. A novel Z-scheme BiOI/BiOCl nanofibers photocatalyst prepared by one-pot solvothermal with efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125031
61. Tao, Q., Chang, D., Lu, T. et al. Multiobjective Stepwise Design Strategy-Assisted Design of High-Performance Perovskite Oxide Photocatalysts. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2021, 125(38): 21141-21150. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05482
62. Huang, H.-H., Tsai, H., Raja, R. et al. Robust Unencapsulated Perovskite Solar Cells Protected by a Fluorinated Fullerene Electron Transporting Layer. ACS Energy Letters, 2021, 6(9): 3376-3385. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01526
63. Tao, Q., Lu, T., Sheng, Y. et al. Machine learning aided design of perovskite oxide materials for photocatalytic water splitting. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2021.01.035
64. Li, Y., Hu, X., Huang, J. et al. Development of Iron-Based Heterogeneous Cocatalysts for Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. Wuli Huaxue Xuebao/ Acta Physico - Chimica Sinica, 2021, 37(8): 2009022. doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009022
65. Yu, H., Liu, J., Li, X. et al. Fabrication of ZnO/ZnS/ZnSe nanosheets for enhanced photocatalytic activity under simulated solar light. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2021, 32(15): 20082-20092. doi:10.1007/s10854-021-06457-6
66. Xu, J., Ma, Y., Wang, J. et al. Constructing defect-rich Ni9S8/Fe5Ni4S8heterostructure nanoparticles for efficient oxygen evolution reaction and overall water splitting. JPhys Materials, 2021, 4(3): 034006. doi:10.1088/2515-7639/abf3ae
67. Wan, T.L., Ge, L., Pan, Y. et al. Catalysis based on ferroelectrics: Controllable chemical reaction with boosted efficiency. Nanoscale, 2021, 13(15): 7096-7107. doi:10.1039/d1nr00847a
68. Huang, H.-H., Ma, Z., Strzalka, J. et al. Mild water intake orients crystal formation imparting high tolerance on unencapsulated halide perovskite solar cells. Cell Reports Physical Science, 2021, 2(4): 100395. doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100395
69. Zhao, C., Li, Z., Tang, T. et al. Novel III-V semiconductor epitaxy for optoelectronic devices through two-dimensional materials. Progress in Quantum Electronics, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.pquantelec.2020.100313
70. Li, Y., Hu, X., Huang, J. et al. Development of Iron-Based Heterogeneous Cocatalysts for Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation | [铁基多相助催化剂光电化学水氧化研究进展]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2021, 37(8): 2009022. doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009022
71. Sarang, S., Delmas, W., Bonabi Naghadeh, S. et al. Low-Temperature Energy Transfer via Self-Trapped Excitons in Mn2+-Doped 2D Organometal Halide Perovskites. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2020, 11(24): 10368-10374. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03287
72. Huang, Y., Liu, J., Zhao, C. et al. Facile Synthesis of Defect-Modified Thin-Layered and Porous g-C3N4with Synergetic Improvement for Photocatalytic H2Production. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 2020, 12(47): 52603-52614. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c14262
73. Komova, O.V., Mukha, S.A., Ozerova, A.M. et al. The formation of perovskite during the combustion of an energy-rich glycine–nitrate precursor. Materials, 2020, 13(22): 1-18. doi:10.3390/ma13225091
74. Fu, H., Tang, A. Rational design of multinary copper chalcogenide nanocrystals for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Journal of Semiconductors, 2020, 41(9): 091706. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/41/9/091706
75. Ma, M., Huang, Y., Liu, J. et al. Engineering the photoelectrochemical behaviors of ZnO for efficient solar water splitting. Journal of Semiconductors, 2020, 41(9): 091702. doi:10.1088/1674-4926/41/9/091702
76. Qian, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, B.-T. et al. Observation of plasmon boosted photoelectrochemical activities on single Au/Cu2O nanoelectrode. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2020, 53(16): 165102. doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ab6e9f
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Yanbin Huang, Jun Liu, Yanchun Deng, Yuanyuan Qian, Xiaohao Jia, Mengmeng Ma, Cheng Yang, Kong Liu, Zhijie Wang, Shengchun Qu, Zhanguo Wang. The application of perovskite materials in solar water splitting[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2020, 41(1): 011701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/1/011701
    Y B Huang, J Liu, Y C Deng, Y Y Qian, X H Jia, M M Ma, C Yang, K Liu, Z J Wang, S C Qu, Z G Wang, The application of perovskite materials in solar water splitting[J]. J. Semicond., 2020, 41(1): 011701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/1/011701.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 7303 Times PDF downloads: 270 Times Cited by: 76 Times

    History

    Received: 24 September 2019 Revised: 25 October 2019 Online: Accepted Manuscript: 07 November 2019Uncorrected proof: 08 November 2019Published: 02 January 2020

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Yanbin Huang, Jun Liu, Yanchun Deng, Yuanyuan Qian, Xiaohao Jia, Mengmeng Ma, Cheng Yang, Kong Liu, Zhijie Wang, Shengchun Qu, Zhanguo Wang. The application of perovskite materials in solar water splitting[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2020, 41(1): 011701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/1/011701 ****Y B Huang, J Liu, Y C Deng, Y Y Qian, X H Jia, M M Ma, C Yang, K Liu, Z J Wang, S C Qu, Z G Wang, The application of perovskite materials in solar water splitting[J]. J. Semicond., 2020, 41(1): 011701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/1/011701.
      Citation:
      Yanbin Huang, Jun Liu, Yanchun Deng, Yuanyuan Qian, Xiaohao Jia, Mengmeng Ma, Cheng Yang, Kong Liu, Zhijie Wang, Shengchun Qu, Zhanguo Wang. The application of perovskite materials in solar water splitting[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2020, 41(1): 011701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/1/011701 ****
      Y B Huang, J Liu, Y C Deng, Y Y Qian, X H Jia, M M Ma, C Yang, K Liu, Z J Wang, S C Qu, Z G Wang, The application of perovskite materials in solar water splitting[J]. J. Semicond., 2020, 41(1): 011701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/1/011701.

      The application of perovskite materials in solar water splitting

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/1/011701
      More Information
      • Corresponding author: Zhijie Wang, wangzj@semi.ac.cn; Shengchun Qu, qsc@semi.ac.cn.
      • Received Date: 2019-09-24
      • Revised Date: 2019-10-25
      • Published Date: 2020-01-01

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return