Citation: |
Xi Lu, Changju Liu, Pinyuan Zhao, Yu Zhang, Bei Li, Zhenzhen Zhang, Jiangtao Xu. Incomplete charge transfer in CMOS image sensor caused by Si/SiO2 interface states in the TG channel[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(11): 114104. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/11/114104
****
Xi Lu, Changju Liu, Pinyuan Zhao, Yu Zhang, Bei Li, Zhenzhen Zhang, Jiangtao Xu, Incomplete charge transfer in CMOS image sensor caused by Si/SiO2 interface states in the TG channel[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(11), 114104 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/11/114104
|
Incomplete charge transfer in CMOS image sensor caused by Si/SiO2 interface states in the TG channel
DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/11/114104
More Information
-
Abstract
CMOS image sensors produced by the existing CMOS manufacturing process usually have difficulty achieving complete charge transfer owing to the introduction of potential barriers or Si/SiO2 interface state traps in the charge transfer path, which reduces the charge transfer efficiency and image quality. Until now, scholars have only considered mechanisms that limit charge transfer from the perspectives of potential barriers and spill back effect under high illumination condition. However, the existing models have thus far ignored the charge transfer limitation due to Si/SiO2 interface state traps in the transfer gate channel, particularly under low illumination. Therefore, this paper proposes, for the first time, an analytical model for quantifying the incomplete charge transfer caused by Si/SiO2 interface state traps in the transfer gate channel under low illumination. This model can predict the variation rules of the number of untransferred charges and charge transfer efficiency when the trap energy level follows Gaussian distribution, exponential distribution and measured distribution. The model was verified with technology computer-aided design simulations, and the results showed that the simulation results exhibit the consistency with the proposed model.-
Keywords:
- CMOS image sensor,
- charge transfer,
- interface state traps
-
References
[1] Fossum E R, Hondongwa D B. A review of the pinned photodiode for CCD and CMOS image sensors. IEEE J Electron Devices Soc, 2014, 2, 33 doi: 10.1109/JEDS.2014.2306412[2] Takayanagi I, Kuroda R. HDR CMOS image sensors for automotive applications. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2022, 69, 2815 doi: 10.1109/TED.2022.3164370[3] Liu B K, Li Y D, Wen L, et al. Displacement damage effects in backside illuminated CMOS image sensors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2022, 69, 2907 doi: 10.1109/TED.2021.3124991[4] Lee Y S, Kim H J. High-speed multilevel binary imaging CMOS image sensor for object feature extraction. IEEE Sens J, 2022, 22, 15934 doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3189653[5] Marcelot O, Panglosse A, Martin-Gonthier P, et al. TCAD calibration at cryogenic temperatures for CMOS image sensor simulations. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2022, 69, 6188 doi: 10.1109/TED.2022.3207120[6] Rizzolo S, Goiffon V, Estribeau M, et al. Influence of pixel design on charge transfer performances in CMOS image sensors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2018, 65, 1048 doi: 10.1109/TED.2018.2790443[7] Han L Q, Yao S Y, Theuwissen A J P. A charge transfer model for CMOS image sensors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2016, 63, 32 doi: 10.1109/TED.2015.2451593[8] Fossum E R. Charge transfer noise and lag in CMOS active pixel sensors. IEEE Workshop CCD’s Adv. Image Sensors, 2003, 11[9] Han L Q, Yao S Y, Xu J T, et al. Analysis of incomplete charge transfer effects in a CMOS image sensor. J Semicond, 2013, 34, 054009 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/5/054009[10] Capoccia R, Boukhayma A, Jazaeri F, et al. Compact modeling of charge transfer in pinned photodiodes for CMOS image sensors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2018, 66, 160 doi: 10.1109/TED.2018.2875946[11] Yang C, Peng G L, Mao W, et al. Novel CMOS image sensor pixel to improve charge transfer speed and efficiency by overlapping gate and temporary storage diffusing node. Chin Phys B, 2021, 30, 018502 doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/abc53f[12] Wang X Y, Gao Y Q, Gao Z Y, et al. Charge transfer potential barrier model of a pinned photodiode in CMOS image sensors. IEEE Sens J, 2022, 22, 4036 doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3139091[13] Khan U, Sarkar M. Analysis of charge transfer potential barrier in pinned photodiode of CMOS image sensors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2021, 68, 2770 doi: 10.1109/TED.2021.3071331[14] Liu L, Guo Y, Li B K, et al. Analytical modeling of potential barrier for charge transfer in pinned photodiode CMOS image sensors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2022, 69, 5637 doi: 10.1109/TED.2022.3200636[15] Hu C Z, Zhang B, Xin Y Z, et al. Analytical modeling of charge behavior in pinned photodiode for CMOS image sensors. IEEE Sens J, 2023, 23, 14295 doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3278307[16] Xu J T, Wang R S, Han L Q, et al. Analysis and modeling of spill back effect in high illumination CMOS image sensors. IEEE Sens J, 2020, 20, 3024 doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2956594[17] Xu Y. Fundamental characteristics of a pinned photodiode CMOS pixel. Ph. D. dissertation, Dept. Microelectron. Comput. Eng., Delft Univ. Technol., Delft, the Netherlands, 2015[18] Fowler B , Liu X. Charge transfer noise in image sensors. International Image Sensor Workshop (IISW), 2007, 2[19] Bonjour L E, Blanc N, Kayal M. Experimental analysis of lag sources in pinned photodiodes. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2012, 33, 1735 doi: 10.1109/LED.2012.2217474[20] Khan U, Sarkar M. Dynamic capacitance model of a pinned photodiode in CMOS image sensors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2018, 65, 2892 doi: 10.1109/TED.2018.2831719[21] Liu E, Zhu B, Luo J. The physics of semiconductors. Beijing: House of Electronics Industry, 2011[22] Mohsen A M, McGill T C, Daimon Y, et al. The influence of interface states on incomplete charge transfer in overlapping gate charge-coupled devices. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 1973, 8, 125 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.1973.1050361[23] Han L Q, Xu J T. Long exposure time noise in pinned photodiode CMOS image sensors. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2018, 39, 979 doi: 10.1109/LED.2018.2839711[24] Xia C Y, Zhang Y, Lu X M, et al. Dynamic model of FWC dependent on the energy-level distribution of interface-state traps in pinned photodiodes. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 2021, 68, 1682 doi: 10.1109/TED.2021.3056019[25] Ayobi A, Mirnia S N. Influence of Gaussian disorder and exponential traps on charge carriers transport and recombination in single layer polymer light-emitting diodes based on PFO as emitting layer. Opt Quantum Electron, 2019, 51, 1 doi: 10.1007/s11082-018-1712-9 -
Proportional views