Electro-magnetic interpretation of four-element torus

Wei Wu; Ning Deng

doi:10.1088/1674-4926/38/11/114008

J. Semicond. > 2017, Volume 38 > Issue 11 > 114008

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES

Electro-magnetic interpretation of four-element torus

Wei Wu and Ning Deng

+ Author Affiliations

Corresponding author: Ning Deng, Email: ningdeng@tsinghua.edu.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/11/114008

Abstract: The concept of the memristor was proposed by Leon Chua in 1971, along with some electro-magnetic interpretations according to quasi-static expansion of Maxwell’s equations. In 2003, Chua included the memristor into a four-element torus that has infinite circuit elements. This paper uses the quasi-static method to interpret every circuit element in the torus. Two examples are also provided to show how topologic structure of an element affects its electrical properties by affecting the dominant electro-magnetic field components. Additionally, it is proved that the circuit elements in the torus, except the resistive, capacitive and inductive elements, cannot exist independently. Moreover, the incorrectness in Chua’s interpretation of the memristor, that the memristor cannot be interpreted with the transient quasi-static method due to its memory property, is pointed out. Finally, the limitations of the electro-magnetic interpretation method are discussed.

Key words: electro-magnetic interpretation, four-element torus, memristor, quasi-static expansion of Maxwell’s equations

References

[1]	Chua L O. Memristor—the missing circuit element. IEEE Trans Circuit Theory, 1971, 18(5): 507 doi: 10.1109/TCT.1971.1083337
[2]	Ho P W C, Almurib H A F, Kumar T N. Memristive SRAM cell of seven transistors and one memristor. J Semicond, 2016, 37(10): 104002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/10/104002
[3]	You Z, Hu F, Huang L, et al. A long lifetime, low error rate RRAM design with self-repair module. J Semicond, 2016, 37(11): 115004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/11/115004
[4]	Kokate P P. Memristor-Based Chaotic Circuits. IETE Techn Rev, 2009, 26(6): 417 doi: 10.4103/0256-4602.57827
[5]	Jo S H, Chang T, Ebong I, et al. Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems. Nano Lett, 2010, 10(4): 1297 doi: 10.1021/nl904092h
[6]	Kim H, Sah M P, Yang C, et al. Neural synaptic weighting with a pulse-based memristor circuit. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I, 2012, 59-I(1): 148
[7]	Shinde S S, Dongle T D. Modelling of nanostructured TiO₂-based memristors. J Semicond, 2015, 36(3): 52
[8]	Biolek Z, Biolek D, Biolkova V. SPICE Model of Memristor with Nonlinear Dopant Drift. Radioengineering, 2009, 18(2): 210
[9]	Kumar A, Baghini M S. Experimental study for selection of electrode material for ZnO-based memristors. Electron Lett, 2014, 50(21): 1547 doi: 10.1049/el.2014.1491
[10]	Ho P W C, Hatem F O, Almurib H A F, et al. Comparison between Pt/TiO₂/Pt and Pt/TaO_X/taO_Y/pt based bipolar resistive switching devices. J Semicond, 2016, 37(6): 064001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064001
[11]	Ventra M D, Pershin Y V, Chua L O. Circuit elements with memory: memristors, memcapacitors, and meminductors. Proc IEEE, 2009, 97(10): 1717 doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2021077
[12]	Wang F Z. A triangular periodic table of elementary circuit elements. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I, 2013, 60(3): 616 doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2012.2209734
[13]	Chua L O. Nonlinear circuit foundations for nanodevices I: the four-element torus. Proc IEEE, 2003, 9(11): 1830 doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2003.818319
[14]	Chua L O. Device modeling via nonlinear circuit elements. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst, 1980, 27(11): 1014 doi: 10.1109/TCS.1980.1084742
[15]	Fano R M, Chu L J, Adler R B. Electromagnetic fields, energy, and forces. Wiley, 1960: 122
[16]	Chua L O. Resistance switching memories are memristors. Appl Phys A, 2011, 102(4): 765

Fig. 1. The four-element torus. (a) Taking ${v^{\left( a \right)}}\!\left( t \right)$ and ${i^{\left( \beta \right)}}\!\left( t \right)$ as coordinate axes to obtain a complete chart. (b) Taking α − β as coordinate axis to distinguish each element series.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 2. (a) The structure of cylindrical conductive medium. (b) The structure of two parallel plates.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Fig. 3. Relationship between electro-magnetic field series. (a) A general relationship in the cylindrical conductive medium. (b) Specific relationship in two parallel plates. (c) Specific relationship to interpret 2nd-order inductor.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Table 1. Coordinate of some common elementary circuit elements.

Property	Common name	Definition	Coordinate
Resistive elements	Differential resistor	$ \displaystyle \frac{{{\rm d}v}}{{{\rm d}t}} = R \displaystyle \frac{{{\rm d}i}}{{{\rm d}t}}$	(1, 1)
	Resistor	v = Ri	(0, 0)
	Memristor	φ = Rq	(−1, −1)
Capacitive elements	Differential capacitor	$ \displaystyle i = C\frac{{{\rm d}v}}{{{\rm d}t}}$	(1, 0)
	Capacitor	q = Cv	(0, −1)
	Memcapacitor	$ \int {q = C\varphi } $	(−1, −2)
Inductive elements	Differential inductor	$ \displaystyle v = L\frac{{{\rm d}i}}{{{\rm d}t}}$	(0, 1)
	Inductor	φ = Li	(−1, 0)
	Meminductor	$\int {\varphi = Lq} $	(−2, −1)

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Chua L O. Memristor—the missing circuit element. IEEE Trans Circuit Theory, 1971, 18(5): 507 doi: 10.1109/TCT.1971.1083337
[2]	Ho P W C, Almurib H A F, Kumar T N. Memristive SRAM cell of seven transistors and one memristor. J Semicond, 2016, 37(10): 104002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/10/104002
[3]	You Z, Hu F, Huang L, et al. A long lifetime, low error rate RRAM design with self-repair module. J Semicond, 2016, 37(11): 115004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/11/115004
[4]	Kokate P P. Memristor-Based Chaotic Circuits. IETE Techn Rev, 2009, 26(6): 417 doi: 10.4103/0256-4602.57827
[5]	Jo S H, Chang T, Ebong I, et al. Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems. Nano Lett, 2010, 10(4): 1297 doi: 10.1021/nl904092h
[6]	Kim H, Sah M P, Yang C, et al. Neural synaptic weighting with a pulse-based memristor circuit. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I, 2012, 59-I(1): 148
[7]	Shinde S S, Dongle T D. Modelling of nanostructured TiO₂-based memristors. J Semicond, 2015, 36(3): 52
[8]	Biolek Z, Biolek D, Biolkova V. SPICE Model of Memristor with Nonlinear Dopant Drift. Radioengineering, 2009, 18(2): 210
[9]	Kumar A, Baghini M S. Experimental study for selection of electrode material for ZnO-based memristors. Electron Lett, 2014, 50(21): 1547 doi: 10.1049/el.2014.1491
[10]	Ho P W C, Hatem F O, Almurib H A F, et al. Comparison between Pt/TiO₂/Pt and Pt/TaO_X/taO_Y/pt based bipolar resistive switching devices. J Semicond, 2016, 37(6): 064001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064001
[11]	Ventra M D, Pershin Y V, Chua L O. Circuit elements with memory: memristors, memcapacitors, and meminductors. Proc IEEE, 2009, 97(10): 1717 doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2021077
[12]	Wang F Z. A triangular periodic table of elementary circuit elements. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I, 2013, 60(3): 616 doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2012.2209734
[13]	Chua L O. Nonlinear circuit foundations for nanodevices I: the four-element torus. Proc IEEE, 2003, 9(11): 1830 doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2003.818319
[14]	Chua L O. Device modeling via nonlinear circuit elements. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst, 1980, 27(11): 1014 doi: 10.1109/TCS.1980.1084742
[15]	Fano R M, Chu L J, Adler R B. Electromagnetic fields, energy, and forces. Wiley, 1960: 122
[16]	Chua L O. Resistance switching memories are memristors. Appl Phys A, 2011, 102(4): 765

Search

GET CITATION

shu

Export: BibTex EndNote

Article Metrics

Article views: 3100 Times PDF downloads: 18 Times Cited by: 0 Times

History

Received: 24 February 2017 Revised: 08 May 2017 Online: Uncorrected proof: 30 October 2017Accepted Manuscript: 13 November 2017Published: 01 November 2017

The concept of the memristor was proposed by Leon Chua in 1971, along with some electro-magnetic interpretations according to quasi-static expansion of Maxwell’s equations. In 2003, Chua included the memristor into a four-element torus that has infinite circuit elements. This paper uses the quasi-static method to interpret every circuit element in the torus. Two examples are also provided to show how topologic structure of an element affects its electrical properties by affecting the dominant electro-magnetic field components. Additionally, it is proved that the circuit elements in the torus, except the resistive, capacitive and inductive elements, cannot exist independently. Moreover, the incorrectness in Chua’s interpretation of the memristor, that the memristor cannot be interpreted with the transient quasi-static method due to its memory property, is pointed out. Finally, the limitations of the electro-magnetic interpretation method are discussed.

Electro-magnetic interpretation of four-element torus

References

Search

GET CITATION

Share:

Article Metrics

History

Catalog

Email This Article

Electro-magnetic interpretation of four-element torus

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/11/114008

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

Electro-magnetic interpretation of four-element torus

References

Search

GET CITATION

Share:

Article Metrics

History

Catalog

Email This Article

Electro-magnetic interpretation of four-element torus

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/11/114008

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content