Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2013, Volume 34 > Issue 8 > 085002

SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS

A dual-band quadrature VCO with gain proportional to oscillation frequency

Wenrui Zhu1, 2, Haigang Yang1, , Tongqiang Gao1 and Hui Zhang1

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Yang Haigang, Email:yanghg@mail.ie.ac.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/8/085002

PDF

Abstract: This paper presents a novel dual-band quadrature voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) with the gain proportional to the oscillation frequency. Frequency synthesizers with this VCO can reduce the bandwidth fluctuation over all the frequency ranges without compensation or calibration. Besides the original switched capacitor array, an extra switched varactor array is adopted for the implementation of the proposed VCO. The tuning technique of changing the values of the capacitor and varactor at the same ratio is also derived. For verification purposes, a 2.5 G/3.5 G dual-band quadrature VCO is fabricated in a 0.13 μm CMOS process for WiMAX applications. Measurement results show that the VCO gain is closely proportional to the oscillation frequency with ±16% variation over the entire frequency range. The phase noise is -138.15 dBc/Hz at 10 MHz from the 2.5 GHz carrier and -137.44 dBc/Hz at 10 MHz from the 3.5 GHz carrier.

Key words: VCOdual-bandtuning techniqueconstant bandwidth

LC-based voltage controlled oscillators (VCOs) have been widely employed in various wideband and multi-band communication systems[1-4]. To achieve a good phase noise performance, the VCO frequency band is usually divided into multiple sub-bands by adopting a binary weighted capacitor array[5]. However, with respect to this type of VCO, the gain (KVCO) is proportional to the cubic oscillation frequency (fVCO)[6], and the loop bandwidth of the frequency synthesizer (FS) changes with the square of fVCO[7], which leads to huge variation in FS performance, such as phase noise and locking time[8]. An effective method to keep the loop bandwidth less dependent on the oscillation frequency is therefore highly desired.

To achieve this, several methods have been previously proposed, and can be categorized into two types: the calibration method[9-12] and the compensation method[6, 13-15]. The calibration method measures theKVCO and then calibrates the current of the charge pump to cancel the variation in loop bandwidth. The compensation method uses a specially designed charge pump with the current changeable with fVCO to compensate the variation in loop bandwidth. However, whether using the calibration or compensation method, the bandwidth problem is solved by adjusting the other function blocks or adding new blocks, and this will increase the complexity and reduce the robustness of the whole FS system.

This paper proposes a VCO with the gain (KVCO) proportional to the oscillation frequency (fVCO). By adopting this kind of VCO, the bandwidth variation problem of the wideband/multiband FS is alleviated. To obtain the proposed VCO character, a switched varactor array, as well as a switched capacitor array, is adopted. The tuning technique of changing the values of the capacitors and varactors at the same ratio is also derived. As an example, a 2.5 G/3.5 G dualband QVCO for WiMAX applications is fabricated and measured.

Figure 1 shows a block diagram of a classical frequency synthesizer, which consists of the VCO, a low pass filter (LPF), a divider, a phase frequency detector (PFD) and a charge pump (CP). The open-loop transfer function of Fig. 1 can be expressed as

HOPEN(s)=ICPKVCO2πNs1+R1C1ss(R1C1C2s+C1+C2),

(1)
Figure  1.  Block diagram of a typical frequency synthesizer.

where ICP represents the sink or source current of the charge pump. KVCO is the gain of VCO and N is the division ratio. The FS transfer function has one zero and three poles.

In a locked frequency synthesizer, it can be easily derived that:

N=fVCOfref.

(2)

Then, Equation (1) can be rewritten as:

HOPEN(s)=ICPfref2πsKVCOfVCO1+R1C1ss(R1C1C2s+C1+C2).

(3)

From Eq. (3), if:

KVCOfVCO=constant,

(4)

then:

HOPEN(s)=ICPfref2πsγ1+R1C1ss(R1C1C2s+C1+C2),

(5)

where γ represents the value of KVCO/fVCO. It can be seen from Eq. (5) that the loop transfer function, as well as the distribution of zeros and poles, is independent of fVCO, and the bandwidth can be approximately given[12] by

ωBW=R1frefIcp2πγ.

(6)

All the parameters in the right hand of Eq. (6) are fixed values, and the bandwidth will remain constant over the whole frequency range. This demonstrates that, by adopting the VCO with the gain proportional to the oscillation frequency, the bandwidth variation problem of FS in wideband/multiband applications can be greatly alleviated. To implement the VCO with constant KVCO/fVCO, an extra switched varactor array is adopted. The VCO tuning technique is derived in the next section.

In LC-VCO, the oscillation frequency fVCO can be written as:

fVCO=12πLCtot=12πL(CV+CF),

(7)

where L is the inductance and Ctot the total capacitance. Ctot consists of two parts: the fixed capacitor part CF, which does not change with the control voltage (VC) and the changeable varactor part CV, which changes linearly with VC. In Eq. (7), CV is equal to 0 when VC is 0.

Assuming at the highest frequency:

fVCO,max=12πL(CF0+CV0),

(8)

where CF0 and CV0 represent the specific value of CF and CV when VCO resonates at the highest frequency. Equation (5) can be rewritten as:

fVCO=12πL(CF+CV)=12πL(αCF0+βCV0),

(9)

where α and β represent the normalized capacitance of CF and CV, respectively. The VCO gain KVCO can be derived as:

KVCO=fVCOVC=fVCO4πL(αCF0+βCV0)(CF0CV0αβ+1)βCV0VC.

(10)

From Eq. (10), it can be derived that if

α=β,

(11)

then Equation (10) can be rewritten as:

KVCO=14πLCV0CV0VCfVCO=ConstantfVCO.

(12)

In Eq. (12), CV0 and CV0/VC are all constants in the linear region of VCO. From Eqs. (11) and (12), if CF and CV changes with the same ratio, the VCO gain KVCO will be proportional to the oscillation frequency fVCO.

In general, a switched capacitor array is adopted in LC-VCO to divide the frequency band into several sub-bands. The in-sub-band frequency tuning is controlled continuously by the analog control voltage VC and the sub-band selection is controlled digitally and discretely by switches.

To implement the VCO with the proposed performance, both CF and CV are made to change with the same ratio. So a switched varactor array, as well as a switched capacitor array, is needed, as shown in Fig. 2.

Figure  2.  Capacitor and varactor arrays in LC-VCO.

In a single-band VCO, for a given number of control bits, m, the available analog range VRAN of the control voltage VC, as well as the frequency range fmin and fmax, the procedure to calculate the switched capacitor and varactor arrays is as follows.

Choose a proper value of inductance L, and then the initial value of capacitance CF0 can be written as:

CF0=14π2L1f2max.

(13)

For a VCO with a binary weighted switched array, the number of sub-bands is 2m. The i-th switched capacitance part value CFi can be derived as:

CFi=14π2L(1f2min1f2max)2i12m,i=1,2,,m.

(14)

So the total value of the switched capacitance is:

ΔCF=mi=1CFi=14π2L(1f2min1f2max)2m12m.

(15)

The initial value of the varactor part CV0 should make the frequency cover the top sub-band when VC changes from 0 to VRAN. It equals CFm, and thus

CV0=14π2L(1f2min1f2max)12m.

(16)

As CF and CV change with the same ratio

CF0ΔCF=CV0ΔCV,

(17)

the total value of the switched capacitance ΔCV can be written as

ΔCV=ΔCFCF0CV0=f2max4π2L(1f2min1f2max)22m122m.

(18)

And the i-th switched capacitance part value CVi can be derived as

CVi=f2max4π2L(1f2min1f2max)22i122m,i=1,2,,m.

(19)

Since CF0, ΔCF, CV0 and CVi are all derived, the next step is to calculate the size of each capacitor and varactor in the switched capacitor and varactor arrays. It is worth mentioning that in CMOS technology, for IC designers, the changeable size of both the varactor and capacitor is their effective area. The capacitance of varactor CVAR contains two parts: the basic capacitance and the changed capacitance. In the linear area, CVAR can be written as

CVAR=SVAR(CVAR+kVARVC)=SVARCVAR+SVARkVARVC,

(20)

where CVAR and kVAR represent the basic capacitance and the slope of the varactor in unit area, respectively. SVAR represents the effective area of the varactor. In Eq. (20), the first and second term of the right-hand side should be counted as the fixed capacitor part CF and the changeable varactor part CV, respectively. So the area of the switched varactor array can be written as:

SVi=CVikVARVRAN,i=1,2,,m,SV0=CV0kVARVRAN.

(21)

In CMOS technology, the capacitance of the capacitor can be written as:

CCAP=SCAPCC,

(22)

where CC represents the capacitance of the capacitor in unit area. SCAP represents the effective area of the capacitor. The basic capacitance of the varactors contributes a part to the fixed capacitance CF0 and ΔCF, so the needed capacitance of the switched capacitor array is decreased, and can be written as:

CCi=CFiSViCVAR,i=1,2,,m,CC0=CF0SV0CVAR.

(23)

The area of the switched capacitor array can be written as:

SCi=CCiCC=kVARVRANCFiCVARCVikVARVRANCC,i=1,2,,m,SC0=CC0CC=kVARVRANCF0CVARCV0kVARVRANCC.

(24)

From the above analysis, both the switched capacitor and varactor arrays in single wideband VCOs are calculated. For multi-band VCOs, a band-selected capacitor and varactor pair is needed, respectively, for one more frequency band. There are three steps to calculate the multi-band VCOs. Firstly, the band with the highest ratio of bandwidth to center frequency is chosen. Then the sub-band-selected switched capacitor and varactor arrays are calculated, as discussed above. Secondly, the band-selected capacitors and varactors of each band are calculated. Note that the band-selected CF and CV also change with the same ratio. Lastly, ensure that the VCO can cover all the frequency ranges of each band. If this is not satisfied, then the capacitor and varactor array must be adjusted and re-calculated from the first step.

A dualband QVCO with the KVCO proportional to fVCO is implemented for the WiMAX application, as shown in Fig. 3. The quadrature signals are generated by the anti-phase cross coupling of two symmetric differential LC oscillators. The detailed circuit schematic of the single-side oscillator is shown in Fig. 4. This is a PMOS-tailed current splitting differential LC-VCO. Both switched capacitor and varactor arrays are adopted in this work. Each frequency band is divided into four sub-bands, which are controlled by en1 and en2 signals. The band-select switch is controlled by the en3 signal.

Figure  3.  Schematic of the proposed dual-band QVCO.
Figure  4.  Schematic of the QVCO single-side circuit.

The proposed LC QVCO is implemented in a 0.13 μm 1P8M RF CMOS technology. A micrograph of the fabricated QVCO is shown in Fig. 5. The sizes of the core circuit are 1.2 × 0.55 mm2, and the output of the QVCO is driven out by QVCO buffers with separated power supplies.

Figure  5.  A die micrograph of the proposed QVCO.

The QVCO tuning characteristics are shown in Fig. 6, and are tunable from 2.44 to 2.63 GHz for the lower band and 3.36 to 3.60 GHz for the higher band. The available tuning range of the control voltage is 0.55-0.95 V in the lower band and 0.45-0.85 V in the higher band.

Figure  6.  The tuning characteristics of the proposed QVCO.

In the available tuning range, the QVCO covers the entire frequency range. The gain (KVCO) grows with oscillation frequency from sub-band to sub-band. Figure 7 shows the average gain versus the centre frequency of each sub-band. The markers represent the measured average KVCO in each sub-band and the line represents the fitting curve of KVCO versus frequency fVCO. From Fig. 7, the average KVCO is closely proportional to the oscillation frequency. The fitting value of KVCO/fVCO is approximately 0.06 (unit: 1/V). The variation is less than 5.22%, and considering the whole frequency range, the variation is ±16%.

Figure  7.  The average KVCO versus centre frequency at each sub-band.

The supply voltage of the proposed QVCO is 1.2 V, and the power consumption is 12 mW. The measured phase noise is -138.15 dBc/Hz at 10 MHz from the 2.5 GHz carrier, and -137.44 dBc/Hz at 10 MHz from the 3.5 GHz carrier, as shown in Figs. 8 and 9, respectively.

Figure  8.  The measured phase noise of the proposed QVCO at a 2.5 GHz carrier.
Figure  9.  The measured phase noise of the proposed QVCO at a 3.5 GHz carrier.

The QVCO figure of merit (FoM) is calculated according to:

FoMQVCO=20lgfoΔf10lgPDC2/1mWPN,

(25)

where fVCO is the oscillation frequency, PN is the phase noise in dBc/Hz, Δf is the offset frequency of the phase noise, and PDC is the power dissipation. For QVCO, the power is twice that of VCO. So when calculating the FoM of the QVCO, the power is divided by 2, as shown in the second term of the right-hand side of Eq. (25). Table 1 shows a comparison of the proposed QVCO with previous works.

Table  1.  Comparison of the proposed VCO with previous works.
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

This paper proposed a quadrature VCO with gain proportional to oscillation frequency. By adopting this kind of VCO, the bandwidth variation problem of wideband/multiband FS can be greatly alleviated. To implement the proposed VCO, the technique of changing the capacitance of the capacitors and varactors at the same ratio is derived. The procedure for calculating the switching capacitor and varactor sizes at each frequency band is also described. A 2.5 G/3.5 G dual band QVCO by the proposed method is fabricated in 0.13 μm CMOS technology. This achieves a tuning range of 2.44-2.63 GHz in the lower band and 3.36-3.60 GHz in the higher band. The measured phase noise is -138.15 dBc/Hz at 10 MHz from a 2.5 GHz carrier and -137.44 dBc/Hz at 10 MHz from a 3.5 GHz carrier. The KVCO is closely proportional to the oscillation frequency with a ±16% variation over the entire frequency range.



[1]
Lu T Y, Chen W Z. A 3-10 GHz, 14 bands CMOS frequency synthesizer with spurs reduction for MB-OFDM UWB system. IEEE Tran Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Syst, 2012, 20:948 doi: 10.1109/TVLSI.2011.2134874
[2]
Catli B, Hella M M. A 1.94 to 2.55 GHz, 3.6 to 4.77 GHz tunable CMOS VCO based on double-tuned, double-driven coupled resonators. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2009, 44:2463 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2009.2023155
[3]
Park E C, Hauspie D, Craninckx J. Wideband VCO with simultaneous switching of frequency band, active core, and varactor size. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2007, 42:1472 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2007.899105
[4]
Xiao Shimao, Ma Chengyan, Ye Tianchun. A novel 2.95-3.65 GHz CMOS LC-VCO using tuning curve compensation. Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(10):105001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/10/105001
[5]
Li Bin, Fan Xiangning, Wang Zhigong. A wideband LC-VCO with small VCO gain variation and adaptive power control. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(10):105008 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/10/105008
[6]
Lu L, Chen J, Yuan L, et al. An 18-mW 1.175-2-GHz frequency synthesizer with constant bandwidth for DVB-T tuners. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 2009, 57(4):928 doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2009.2014449
[7]
Hauspie D, Park E C, Craninckx J. Wideband VCO with simultaneous switching of frequency band, active core, and varactor size. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2007, 42:1472 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2007.899105
[8]
Zhang H. Research into design techniques of reconfigurable phase-locked loop based on standard CMOS technology. Doctor Thesis, Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academic of Sciences, 2011(in Chinese)
[9]
Akamine Y, Kawabe M, Hori K, et al. Delta-sigma PLL transmitter with a loop-bandwidth calibration system. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2008, 43:497 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2007.914325
[10]
Rao A, Mansour M, Singh G, et al. A 4-6.4 GHz LC PLL with adaptive bandwidth control for a forwarded clock link. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2008, 43:2099 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2008.2001870
[11]
Shanan H, Retz G, Mulvaney K, et al. A 2.4 GHz 2 Mb/s versatile PLL-based transmitter using digital pre-emphasis and auto calibration in 0.18μm CMOS for WPAN. IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, 2009:420
[12]
Shin J, Shin H. A 1.9-3.8 GHz delta-sigma fractional-N PLL frequency synthesizer with fast auto-calibration of loop bandwidth and VCO frequency. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2012, 47:665 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2011.2179733
[13]
Wu T, Hanumolu P K, Mayaram K, et al. Method for a constant loop bandwidth in LC-VCO PLL frequency synthesizers. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2009, 44:427 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2008.2010792
[14]
Feng Y, Chen G. A fractional-N synthesizer for multi-mode positioning system with constant loop bandwidth. International Conference of Electron Devices and Solid-State Circuits (EDSSC), 2011:1 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6117626/?reload=true&arnumber=6117626&filter%3DAND%28p_IS_Number%3A6117556%29
[15]
Lu L, Gong Z, Liao Y, et al. A 975-to-1960 MHz fast-locking fractional-N synthesizer with adaptive bandwidth control and 4/4.5 prescaler for digital TV tuners. IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, 2009:96, 397a
[16]
Zhou Chunyuan, Zhang Lei, Qian He. A uniform phase noise QVCO with a feedback current source. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(7):075001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/7/075001
[17]
Long Qiang, Zhuang Yiqi, Yin Yue, et al. Design of a CMOS multi-mode GNSS receiver VCO. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(5):055003 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/5/055003
Fig. 1.  Block diagram of a typical frequency synthesizer.

Fig. 2.  Capacitor and varactor arrays in LC-VCO.

Fig. 3.  Schematic of the proposed dual-band QVCO.

Fig. 4.  Schematic of the QVCO single-side circuit.

Fig. 5.  A die micrograph of the proposed QVCO.

Fig. 6.  The tuning characteristics of the proposed QVCO.

Fig. 7.  The average KVCO versus centre frequency at each sub-band.

Fig. 8.  The measured phase noise of the proposed QVCO at a 2.5 GHz carrier.

Fig. 9.  The measured phase noise of the proposed QVCO at a 3.5 GHz carrier.

Table 1.   Comparison of the proposed VCO with previous works.

[1]
Lu T Y, Chen W Z. A 3-10 GHz, 14 bands CMOS frequency synthesizer with spurs reduction for MB-OFDM UWB system. IEEE Tran Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Syst, 2012, 20:948 doi: 10.1109/TVLSI.2011.2134874
[2]
Catli B, Hella M M. A 1.94 to 2.55 GHz, 3.6 to 4.77 GHz tunable CMOS VCO based on double-tuned, double-driven coupled resonators. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2009, 44:2463 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2009.2023155
[3]
Park E C, Hauspie D, Craninckx J. Wideband VCO with simultaneous switching of frequency band, active core, and varactor size. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2007, 42:1472 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2007.899105
[4]
Xiao Shimao, Ma Chengyan, Ye Tianchun. A novel 2.95-3.65 GHz CMOS LC-VCO using tuning curve compensation. Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(10):105001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/10/105001
[5]
Li Bin, Fan Xiangning, Wang Zhigong. A wideband LC-VCO with small VCO gain variation and adaptive power control. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(10):105008 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/10/105008
[6]
Lu L, Chen J, Yuan L, et al. An 18-mW 1.175-2-GHz frequency synthesizer with constant bandwidth for DVB-T tuners. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 2009, 57(4):928 doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2009.2014449
[7]
Hauspie D, Park E C, Craninckx J. Wideband VCO with simultaneous switching of frequency band, active core, and varactor size. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2007, 42:1472 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2007.899105
[8]
Zhang H. Research into design techniques of reconfigurable phase-locked loop based on standard CMOS technology. Doctor Thesis, Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academic of Sciences, 2011(in Chinese)
[9]
Akamine Y, Kawabe M, Hori K, et al. Delta-sigma PLL transmitter with a loop-bandwidth calibration system. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2008, 43:497 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2007.914325
[10]
Rao A, Mansour M, Singh G, et al. A 4-6.4 GHz LC PLL with adaptive bandwidth control for a forwarded clock link. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2008, 43:2099 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2008.2001870
[11]
Shanan H, Retz G, Mulvaney K, et al. A 2.4 GHz 2 Mb/s versatile PLL-based transmitter using digital pre-emphasis and auto calibration in 0.18μm CMOS for WPAN. IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, 2009:420
[12]
Shin J, Shin H. A 1.9-3.8 GHz delta-sigma fractional-N PLL frequency synthesizer with fast auto-calibration of loop bandwidth and VCO frequency. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2012, 47:665 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2011.2179733
[13]
Wu T, Hanumolu P K, Mayaram K, et al. Method for a constant loop bandwidth in LC-VCO PLL frequency synthesizers. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2009, 44:427 doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2008.2010792
[14]
Feng Y, Chen G. A fractional-N synthesizer for multi-mode positioning system with constant loop bandwidth. International Conference of Electron Devices and Solid-State Circuits (EDSSC), 2011:1 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6117626/?reload=true&arnumber=6117626&filter%3DAND%28p_IS_Number%3A6117556%29
[15]
Lu L, Gong Z, Liao Y, et al. A 975-to-1960 MHz fast-locking fractional-N synthesizer with adaptive bandwidth control and 4/4.5 prescaler for digital TV tuners. IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, 2009:96, 397a
[16]
Zhou Chunyuan, Zhang Lei, Qian He. A uniform phase noise QVCO with a feedback current source. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(7):075001 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/7/075001
[17]
Long Qiang, Zhuang Yiqi, Yin Yue, et al. Design of a CMOS multi-mode GNSS receiver VCO. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(5):055003 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/5/055003
1

Subthreshold analog techniques

Nanjian Wu

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(2): 020204. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/2/020204

2

Low phase noise GaAs HBT VCO in Ka-band

Ting Yan, Yuming Zhang, Hongliang Lü, Yimen Zhang, Yue Wu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(2): 025001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/2/025001

3

FDTD technique based crosstalk analysis of bundled SWCNT interconnects

Yograj Singh Duksh, Brajesh Kumar Kaushik, Rajendra P. Agarwal

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(5): 055002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/5/055002

4

0.9 GHz and 2.4 GHz dual-band SiGe HBT LNA

Zhiyi Lu, Hongyun Xie, Wenjuan Huo, Wanrong Zhang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(2): 025002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/2/025002

5

Design optimizations of phase noise, power consumption and frequency tuning for VCO

Nan Chen, Shengxi Diao, Lu Huang, Xuefei Bai, Fujiang Lin, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(9): 095009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/9/095009

6

A constant loop bandwidth fractional-N frequency synthesizer for GNSS receivers

Yin Xizhen, Xiao Shimao, Jin Yuhua, Wu Qiwu, Ma Chengyan, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(4): 045007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/4/045007

7

A wide-band low phase noise LC-tuned VCO with constant KVCOosc for LTE PLL

Huang Jiwei, Wang Zhigong, Li Kuili, Li Zhengping, Wang Yongping, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(2): 025008. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/2/025008

8

A robust and simple two-mode digital calibration technique for pipelined ADC

Yin Xiumei, Zhao Nan, Sekedi Bomeh Kobenge, Yang Huazhong

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(3): 035001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/3/035001

9

A 2.4 GHz high-linearity low-phase-noise CMOS LC-VCO based on capacitance compensation

Li Zhenrong, Zhuang Yiqi, Li Bing, Jin Gang, Jin Zhao, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(7): 075005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/7/075005

10

A 4.2–5 GHz, low phase noise LC-VCO with constant bandwidth and small tuning gain

Xu Conghui, Xi Jingtian, Lu Lei, Yang Yuqing, Tan Xi, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(9): 095002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/9/095002

11

A VCO sub-band selection circuit for fast PLL calibration

Song Ying, Wang Yuan, Jia Song, Zhao Baoying

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 085010. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/085010

12

A Wideband LC-VCO with Small Tuning Gain Fluctuation

Yuan Lu, Tang Zhangwen, Min Hao

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(5): 1003-1009.

13

A 12~18GHz Wide Band VCO Based on Quasi-MMIC

Wang Shaodong, Gao Xuebang, Wu Hongjiang, Wang Xiangwei, Mo Lidong, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(1): 63-68.

14

A New CMOS Image Sensor with a High Fill Factor and the Dynamic Digital Double Sampling Technique

Liu Yu, Wang Guoyu

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 313-317.

15

Digital Coarse Tuning Loop for Wide-Band Fast-Settling Dual-Loop Frequency Synthesizers

Liu Junhua, Liao Huailin, Yin Jun, Huang Ru, Zhang Xing, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(11): 1911-1917.

16

An Ultra Wideband VHF CMOS LC VCO

Ning Yanqing, Wang Zhihua, Chen Hongyi

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(1): 14-18.

17

Decarbonization and Decolorization of Large Sapphire Crystals Grown by the Temperature Gradient Technique

Xu Jun, Zhou Guoqing, Deng Peizhen, Si Jiliang, Qian Xiaobo, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 245-248.

18

30GHz PHEMT Oscillator

Wu Ahui

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(S1): 252-255.

19

A Ku Band HFET MMIC VCO with Source Terminal Tuning

Wang Shaodong, Gao Xuebang, Wu Hongjiang, Wu Ahui

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(11): 2191-2195.

20

A 4.8GHz CMOS Fully Integrated LC Balanced Oscillator with Symmetrical Noise Filter Technique and Large Tuning Range

Yang Fenglin, Zhang Zhaofeng, Li Baoqi, and Min Hao

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(3): 448-454.

  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Wenrui Zhu, Haigang Yang, Tongqiang Gao, Hui Zhang. A dual-band quadrature VCO with gain proportional to oscillation frequency[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(8): 085002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/8/085002
    W R Zhu, H G Yang, T Q Gao, H Zhang. A dual-band quadrature VCO with gain proportional to oscillation frequency[J]. J. Semicond., 2013, 34(8): 085002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/8/085002.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 2335 Times PDF downloads: 19 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    History

    Received: 21 January 2013 Revised: 17 February 2013 Online: Published: 01 August 2013

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Wenrui Zhu, Haigang Yang, Tongqiang Gao, Hui Zhang. A dual-band quadrature VCO with gain proportional to oscillation frequency[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(8): 085002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/8/085002 ****W R Zhu, H G Yang, T Q Gao, H Zhang. A dual-band quadrature VCO with gain proportional to oscillation frequency[J]. J. Semicond., 2013, 34(8): 085002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/8/085002.
      Citation:
      Wenrui Zhu, Haigang Yang, Tongqiang Gao, Hui Zhang. A dual-band quadrature VCO with gain proportional to oscillation frequency[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(8): 085002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/8/085002 ****
      W R Zhu, H G Yang, T Q Gao, H Zhang. A dual-band quadrature VCO with gain proportional to oscillation frequency[J]. J. Semicond., 2013, 34(8): 085002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/8/085002.

      A dual-band quadrature VCO with gain proportional to oscillation frequency

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/8/085002
      Funds:

      the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61106025

      the National High Technology Research & Development Program of China 2012AA012301

      Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61106025) and the National High Technology Research & Development Program of China (No. 2012AA012301)

      More Information
      • Corresponding author: Yang Haigang, Email:yanghg@mail.ie.ac.cn
      • Received Date: 2013-01-21
      • Revised Date: 2013-02-17
      • Published Date: 2013-08-01

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return