Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js
J. Semicond. > 2014, Volume 35 > Issue 10 > 103003

SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS

Te doped ultrabroad band tunnel junction

Hongbo Lu, Jingman Shen, Xinyi Li, Wei Zhang, Dayong Zhou, Lijie Sun and Kaijian Chen

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Lu Hongbo, Email:lhb2139@163.com

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/10/103003

PDF

Abstract: A GaInP/AlGaAs broadband tunnel junction (TJ) with a peak current density of 65.3 A/cm2 and an AlGaInP/AlGaAs ultrabroad band TJ with a peak current density of 6.1 A/cm2 were studied and fabricated. Diethyltellurium (DETe) was chosen as an n-type dopant in the TJ. The growth temperature, valve switching and flow variation parameters of DETe were studied for better performance. Measurements, including predoping of DETe before growth and heating up reactor temperature after growth, were taken to deal with the effect of turn-on and off of tellurium. The strain balance method was used to the manage lattice mismatch that was introduced by the tellurium. Various flows of DETe were studied to get the appropriate value needed to fabricate a high peak current density tunnel junction.

Key words: tunnel junctionsolar cellbroadband

Solar cells composed of group Ⅴ and group Ⅲ elements have achieved the highest efficiency of 35.1% under AM0 spectrum[1], which is obtained from a multi-junction solar cell (MJSC). Solar cells of this type have been widely used for space and terrestrial purposes. These devices are typically manufactured by metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), and tunnel junctions (TJ) are used to interconnect the sub-cells for the convenience of carrier transport. A tunnel junction that can be applied in a cell device needs to be optimized for the best electrical and optical characteristics.

With the increasing bandgap of solar cells, the demand for broader bandgap TJ is becoming increasingly urgent. AlGaInP and Al0.2GaAs were chosen as materials for the 1st and 2nd junction cell in 5-junction solar cell, thus the traditional Ga0.52InP/Al0.4GaAs TJ cannot fulfill the requirement of optical transparence due to its narrow bandgap. One promising TJ is AlGaInP/Al0.8GaAs, which has a broader bandgap than Al0.2GaAs subcell and which makes the TJ layer more optically transparent to the underlying middle cell than a Ga0.52InP/Al0.4GaAs TJ. However, a high doping concentration becomes more difficult to achieve in a broader bandgap n-type material.Tellurium is a promising n-type dopant for tunnel junction between top and middle cells in broadband solar cells[2]. Material doped with tellurium allows higher degeneracy of the electron states in the conduction band, which provides large tunneling current densities. Another benefit of tellurium doping is the relatively low diffusion of Te in epi-layer due to its large atomic size[3]. However, tellurium may produce a large compressive strain in GaInP or AlGaInP due to its large atomic size. Moreover, tellurium, as a surfactant, can affect the layer composition by slightly unbalancing the incorporation of gallium and indium into the crystal lattice[4]. All of the above phenomena make the lattice-matched epi-layer lattice mismatched to the substrate. In addition, when incorporated into MJSCs, a sharp doping profile with high carrier concentration is required in a thin epitaxial layer (15-50 nm) in the TJ[5]. The aim of this paper is to study how to acquire an excellent tellurium doped ultrabroad band TJ that can be applied to multi-junction solar cells. To simplify the experimental procedure, parameter optimization was carried out in Ga0.52InP/Al0.4GaAs TJ because its properties are similar to that of AlGaInP/Al0.8GaAs. The optimized growth conditions were then transplanted to AlGaInP/Al0.8GaAs TJ.

Tellurium doped GaInP and AlGaInP samples were grown in a horizontal, low-pressure, AIX-2600 reactor at 650 ℃, n type GaAs oriented (100) 15 off towards the nearest (011) plane was used as substrates. The source materials were trimethylgallium (TMGa), trimethylindium (TMIn), purified phosphine (PH3), purified arsine (AsH3) and diethyltelluride (DETe). Pd-purified hydrogen was used as a carrier gas. The growth parameters varied in these experiments, including growth temperature, DETe flow, and TMGa flow, while keeping the flow of TMIn constant. To achieve a lattice-matched epi-layer, high resolution double crystal X-ray diffraction (HRXRD) rocking curves and photoluminescence (PL) measurement were used to characterize material composition. Electrochemical capacitance voltage (ECV) profiling was used to measure the doping concentration of the TJ, and an I-V test was applied to confirm the tunneling effect.

When tellurium is incorporated on the phosphorus site as an n type dopant in GaInP and AlGaInP layers, it produces a compressive strain on the lattice matched epi-layers because its atom size is much bigger than that of phosphorus. In addition, Te will act as a surfactant when the surface coverage of Te reaches a critical value, it tends to control group Ⅲ adatom incorporation and create a positive feedback mechanism with indium[6]. Therefore, the affinity of tellurium and indium manifests and the latter begins to be preferentially incorporated into the alloy. A higher indium content in the GaInP will make possible a higher Te incorporation. High concentration of tellurium required for tunnel junctions causes a lattice mismatch between the epitaxial layer and the substrate. The HRXRD rocking curve in Fig. 1 illustrates the variation of the lattice. The TMGa flow is 11.2 sccm in undoped GaInP, which is lattice matched to substrate. However, the epi-layer became lattice mismatched when doped with tellurium, as shown in sample 129. To reduce the compressive strain, we intentionally increased the TMGa flow during the growth of Te doping GaInP single layer. Sample 130-132 shows a decreasing lattice mismatch, the inset in Fig. 1 describe this tendency. Sample 132 is nearly lattice matched (as confirmed by the PL measurement), whose peak located in 675nm has a gallium mole fraction of 0.53. Sample 133 in Fig. 1 illustrates the XRD curve of GaInP: Te/AlGaAs: C TJ, peak A is probably due to the tensile strain produced by carbon doping in the AlGaAs layer. To acquire a high quality lattice matched epi-layer, we adopt the strain balance method. In detail, the tensile produced by carbon doped AlGaAs was used to balance the compression produced by Te doped GaInP. With the help of gallium mole variation, the epi-layer again became lattice-matched to the substrate.

Figure  1.  XRD curves for GaInP layers with increasing Ga-content in samples 129–132, sample 133 is a broad band TJ.

Tellurium acts as a surfactant in the MOCVD growth epilayer[7]. It accumulated in the surface of the newly grown layer and was slowly incorporated into the next grown layer, even when the DETe valve was turned off. The remaining tellurium would neutralize the carbon dopant in the subsequent AlGaAs layer and decrease the tunneling effect of the TJ. To desorb the residual tellurium, the wafer was heated up by approximately 50 ℃ in phosphine and then the temperature was adjusted for growth of the AlGaAs layer, the corresponding temperature variation and valve switching of sample 142 are shown in Fig. 3. This measure caused an obvious increasing carbon doping concentration in the AlGaAs layer, and resulted in the improvement of the peak current of the corresponding TJ.

Figure  2.  PL result of sample 132 after adjusting the flow of gallium.
Figure  3.  Temperature variation and valve switch of sample 142.

To obtain the designed doping concentration, sample 135 was grown with gradient Te doping GaInP, as illustrated in Fig. 4. The corresponding numerical result is listed in Table 1.

Figure  4.  ECV result of gradient Te doping GaInP epi-layer of sample 135.
Table  1.  Doping concentration GaInP under different DETe flows.
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

The inset in Fig. 4 shows that the doping concentration is linear-related to DETe flow, thus the DETe flow needed for TJ could be calculated by extrapolation and then applied to the fabrication of broadband AlGaInP/AlGaAs TJ. The doping profile of an optimized TJ (sample 142) is shown in Fig. 5, the calculated flow of DETe is 4.2 × 106 sccm, and both the p-and n-type doping fulfill the requirement of TJ, theoretically.

Figure  5.  Doping profile of AlGaInP/AlGaAs TJ in sample 142.

By further optimizing the growth parameter, GaInP:Te/Al0.4GaAs:C broadband TJ was fabricated in a 0.18 × 0.176 cm2 wafer, whose peak current was 2.07(0.18×0.176) = 65.3 A/cm2. The corresponding characteristic is shown in Fig. 6.

Figure  6.  characteristic of GaInP:Te/Al0.4GaAs:C TJ.

There is more difficulty in achieving a high doping concentration in ultrabroad band AlGaInP/AlGaAs TJ because its band gap is broader than that of GaInP/AlGaAs TJ. The problems of lattice mismatching and turn on/off effect of DETe also exist in ultrabroad band TJ. Therefore, the doping characteristics of AlGaAs and AlGaInP were studied separately. In detail, GaAs: Si/Al0.8GaAs TJ and AlGaInP:Te/GaAs:C TJ were studied to achieve the optimized parameters of Al0.8GaAs and AlGaInP involved in ultrabroad band TJ.

The method used in optimizing GaInP/Al0.4GaAs broadband TJ was applied to the growth of AlGaInP/Al0.8GaAs TJ, and a peak current density of 0.750.35×0.35 = 6.1 A/cm2 was obtained in a 0.35 × 0.35 cm2 wafer; the corresponding characteristic is shown in Fig. 7.

Figure  7.  band TJ was applied to the growth of AlGaInP/Al0.8GaAs TJ, and a peak current density of 0.750.35×0.35=6.1 A/cm2 was obtained in a 0.35 × 0.35 cm2 wafer; the corresponding characteristic is shown in Fig. 7.

Broad and ultrabroad band tunnel junctions using DETe as an n-type dopant were fabricated, the growth temperature, valve switching and flow of DETe parameters were studied. Our experiment demonstrated that tellurium acts as a surfactant during MOCVD growth and it introduced positive feedback with indium, which resulted in lattice mismatching between substrate and epi-layer. Predoping and desorption of DETe before and after growth were used to weaken the effect of turn-on and off. A high peak current needs an appropriate flow of DETe, consequently, by all of the the measures mentioned above, a GaInP/AlGaAs broadband TJ with a peak current of 65.3 A/cm2 and an AlGaInP/AlGaAs ultrabroad band TJ with peak current of 6.1 A/cm2 were fabricated.



[1]
Chiu P T, Law D C, Woo R L, et al. Direct semiconductor bonded 5J cell for space and terrestrial applications. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2014, 4(1):493 doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2279336
[2]
Ebert C, Pulwin Z, Byrnes D. Tellurium doping of InGaP for tunnel junction applications in triple junction solar cells. J Cryst Growth, 2011, 315:61 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.09.050
[3]
Garcia I, Rey-Stolle I, Galiana B, et al. Analysis of tellurium as n-type dopant in GaInP:doping, diffusion, memory effect and surfactant properties. J Cryst Growth, 2007, 298:794 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.10.099
[4]
Stringfellow G B, Shurtle J K, Lee R T, et al. Surface processes in OMVPE-the frontiers. J Cryst Growth, 2000, 221:1 doi: 10.1016/S0022-0248(00)00640-0
[5]
Jun S W, Stringfellow G B, Howard A D, et al. Kinetics of Te doping in disordering GaInP grown by organometallic vapor phase epitaxy. J Appl Phys, 2001, 90:6048 doi: 10.1063/1.1416857
[6]
Forbes D V, Bailey C G, Polly, et al. The effect of TE as a surfactant on OMVPE of InAs quantum dots. 34th PVSC, 2009:400 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5411654/?arnumber=5411654&filter%3DAND(p_IS_Number:5411118)
Fig. 1.  XRD curves for GaInP layers with increasing Ga-content in samples 129–132, sample 133 is a broad band TJ.

Fig. 2.  PL result of sample 132 after adjusting the flow of gallium.

Fig. 3.  Temperature variation and valve switch of sample 142.

Fig. 4.  ECV result of gradient Te doping GaInP epi-layer of sample 135.

Fig. 5.  Doping profile of AlGaInP/AlGaAs TJ in sample 142.

Fig. 6.  characteristic of GaInP:Te/Al0.4GaAs:C TJ.

Fig. 7.  band TJ was applied to the growth of AlGaInP/Al0.8GaAs TJ, and a peak current density of 0.750.35×0.35=6.1 A/cm2 was obtained in a 0.35 × 0.35 cm2 wafer; the corresponding characteristic is shown in Fig. 7.

Table 1.   Doping concentration GaInP under different DETe flows.

[1]
Chiu P T, Law D C, Woo R L, et al. Direct semiconductor bonded 5J cell for space and terrestrial applications. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2014, 4(1):493 doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2279336
[2]
Ebert C, Pulwin Z, Byrnes D. Tellurium doping of InGaP for tunnel junction applications in triple junction solar cells. J Cryst Growth, 2011, 315:61 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.09.050
[3]
Garcia I, Rey-Stolle I, Galiana B, et al. Analysis of tellurium as n-type dopant in GaInP:doping, diffusion, memory effect and surfactant properties. J Cryst Growth, 2007, 298:794 doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.10.099
[4]
Stringfellow G B, Shurtle J K, Lee R T, et al. Surface processes in OMVPE-the frontiers. J Cryst Growth, 2000, 221:1 doi: 10.1016/S0022-0248(00)00640-0
[5]
Jun S W, Stringfellow G B, Howard A D, et al. Kinetics of Te doping in disordering GaInP grown by organometallic vapor phase epitaxy. J Appl Phys, 2001, 90:6048 doi: 10.1063/1.1416857
[6]
Forbes D V, Bailey C G, Polly, et al. The effect of TE as a surfactant on OMVPE of InAs quantum dots. 34th PVSC, 2009:400 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5411654/?arnumber=5411654&filter%3DAND(p_IS_Number:5411118)
1

Broadband full-stokes polarimeter based on ReS2 nanobelts

Tinghao Lin, Wendian Yao, Zeyi Liu, Haizhen Wang, Dehui Li, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2025, 46(3): 032702. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24080023

2

ZnSe/ITO thin films:candidate for CdTe solar cell window layer

A.A. Khurram, M. Imran, Nawazish A. Khan, M. Nasir Mehmood

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(9): 093001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/9/093001

3

Large area perovskite solar cell module

Longhua Cai, Lusheng Liang, Jifeng Wu, Bin Ding, Lili Gao, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(1): 014006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/1/014006

4

Simulation of double junction In0.46Ga0.54N/Si tandem solar cell

M. Benaicha, L. Dehimi, Nouredine Sengouga

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(4): 044002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/4/044002

5

ZnO1-xTex and ZnO1-xSx semiconductor alloys as competent materials for opto-electronic and solar cell applications:a comparative analysis

Utsa Das, Partha P. Pal

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(8): 082001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/8/082001

6

Designing of 1 eV GaNAs/GaInAs superlattice subcell in current-matched four-junction solar cell

Haixiao Wang, Xinhe Zheng, Xinyuan Gan, Naiming Wang, Hui Yang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(1): 014004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/1/014004

7

Numerical simulation of the performance of the a-Si:H/a-SiGe:H/a-SiGe:H tandem solar cell

Shaoying Ke, Chong Wang, Tao Pan, Jie Yang, Yu Yang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(3): 034013. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/3/034013

8

A 2.05 eV AlGaInP sub-cell used in next generation solar cells

Hongbo Lu, Xinyi Li, Wei Zhang, Dayong Zhou, Mengqi Shi, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(9): 094010. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/9/094010

9

A GaAs/GaInP dual junction solar cell grown by molecular beam epitaxy

Pan Dai, Shulong Lu, Lian Ji, Wei He, Lifeng Bian, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(10): 104006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/10/104006

10

AlGaAs/GaAs tunnel junctions in a 4-J tandem solar cell

Lü Siyu, Qu Xiaosheng

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(11): 112003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/11/112003

11

Optical and electrical properties of porous silicon layer formed on the textured surface by electrochemical etching

Ou Weiying, Zhao Lei, Diao Hongwei, Zhang Jun, Wang Wenjing, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(5): 056002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/5/056002

12

Performance analysis of solar cell arrays in concentrating light intensity

Xu Yongfeng, Li Ming, Wang Liuling, Lin Wenxian, Xiang Ming, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 084011. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/084011

13

Novel approach for characterizing the specific shunt resistance caused by the penetration of the front contact through the p–n junction in solar cell

Zhang Lucheng, Shen Hui

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(7): 074007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/7/074007

14

Boron-doped silicon film as a recombination layer in the tunnel junction of a tandem solar cell

Shi Mingji, Wang Zhanguo, Liu Shiyong, Peng Wenbo, Xiao Haibo, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(6): 063001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/6/063001

15

Fabrication of InAsP/InGaAsP Quantum-Well 1.3μm VCSELsby Direct Wafer-Bonding

Lao Yanfeng, Cao Chunfang, Wu Huizhen, Cao Meng, Liu Cheng, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(11): 2286-2291.

16

A UHF Balanced Broadband 20W Power Amplifier

Huang Qinghua, Hao Mingli, Wang Yuchen, Zhang Zongnan, Liu Xunchun, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(2): 361-365.

17

Electrical and Optical Properties of Cu2 ZnSnS4 Thin Films Prepared for Solar Cell Absorber

Shao Lexi, Fu Yujun, Zhang Jun, He Deyan

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(S1): 337-340.

18

Application of Buried Tunnel Junction in Long-Wavelength VCSEL Structure

Liu Cheng, Wu Huizhen, Lao Yanfeng, Huang Zhanchao, Cao Meng, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(S1): 309-313.

19

Structural Characteristic of CdS Thin films and Their Influence on Cu(in,Ga)Se2(CIGS) Thin Film Solar Cell

Xue Yuming, Sun Yun, He Qing, Liu Fangfang, Li Changjian,and Ji Mingliang, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(2): 225-229.

20

A Broadband Long-Wavelength Superluminescent Diode Based on Graded Composition Bulk InGaAs

Ding Ying, Wang Wei, Kan Qiang, Wang Baojun, Zhou Fan, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(12): 2309-2314.

  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Hongbo Lu, Jingman Shen, Xinyi Li, Wei Zhang, Dayong Zhou, Lijie Sun, Kaijian Chen. Te doped ultrabroad band tunnel junction[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(10): 103003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/10/103003
    H B Lu, J M Shen, X Y Li, W Zhang, D Y Zhou, L J Sun, K J Chen. Te doped ultrabroad band tunnel junction[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(10): 103003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/10/103003.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 2915 Times PDF downloads: 23 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    History

    Received: 02 January 2014 Revised: 01 April 2014 Online: Published: 01 October 2014

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Hongbo Lu, Jingman Shen, Xinyi Li, Wei Zhang, Dayong Zhou, Lijie Sun, Kaijian Chen. Te doped ultrabroad band tunnel junction[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(10): 103003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/10/103003 ****H B Lu, J M Shen, X Y Li, W Zhang, D Y Zhou, L J Sun, K J Chen. Te doped ultrabroad band tunnel junction[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(10): 103003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/10/103003.
      Citation:
      Hongbo Lu, Jingman Shen, Xinyi Li, Wei Zhang, Dayong Zhou, Lijie Sun, Kaijian Chen. Te doped ultrabroad band tunnel junction[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(10): 103003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/10/103003 ****
      H B Lu, J M Shen, X Y Li, W Zhang, D Y Zhou, L J Sun, K J Chen. Te doped ultrabroad band tunnel junction[J]. J. Semicond., 2014, 35(10): 103003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/10/103003.

      Te doped ultrabroad band tunnel junction

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/10/103003
      More Information
      • Corresponding author: Lu Hongbo, Email:lhb2139@163.com
      • Received Date: 2014-01-02
      • Revised Date: 2014-04-01
      • Published Date: 2014-10-01

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return