Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2016, Volume 37 > Issue 6 > 064005

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES

Finite element analysis of expansion-matched submounts for high-power laser diodes packaging

Yuxi Ni, Xiaoyu Ma, Hongqi Jing and Suping Liu

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Hongqi Jing, Email: jinghq@semi.ac.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064005

PDF

Abstract: In order to improve the output power and increase the lifetime of laser diodes, expansion-matched submounts were investigated by finite element analysis. The submount was designed as sandwiched structure. By varying the vertical structure and material of the middle layer, the thermal expansion behavior on the mounting surface was simulated to obtain the expansion-matched design. In addition, the thermal performance of laser diodes packaged by different submounts was compared. The numerical results showed that, changing the thickness ratio of surface copper to middle layer will lead the stress and junction temperature to the opposite direction. Thus compromise needs to be made in the design of the vertical structure. In addition, the silicon carbide (SiC) is the most promising material candidate for the middle layer among the materials discussed in this paper. The simulated results were aimed at providing guidance for the optimal design of sandwich-structure submounts.

Key words: high-power laser diodescoefficient of thermal expansionthermal managementfinite element analysis

Optoelectronic devices have been widely used in communication, illumination, military, and material processing in the past decades. Extensive studies have shown that the performance, lifetime and cost of optoelectronic devices largely depend on the package technology[1-3]. Specific to high-power laser diodes, which have been commonly used as efficient pumping sources for solid-state systems and fiber lasers, the market is looking forwards to higher power output and longer lifetime. The power level is usually limited by the catastrophic optical mirror damage (COMD) and thermal rollover, both of which are caused by the temperature rising of the active region. State-of-the-art laser diodes have electrical-to-optical conversion efficiency of up to 70% in labs[4], while commercially available products have typical efficiency between 50% and 60%. Half of the power input has to be dissipated as waste heat, leading to considerable temperature rising in the active region under high-power operation. Moreover, efficiency is the function of the junction temperature, and decreases exponentially with increasing temperature, leading to more heat generated in the active region. This positive feedback results in COMD or thermal rollover, limiting the power output level of laser diodes. As to the lifetime, two main factors responsible for the failure of laser diodes are junction temperature and mechanical stress[5]. Most of the stress is caused by the mismatch of the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) between the chip and the heat sink. During the die bonding process, the chip, solder, and heat sink cool from the melting temperature of the solder, leading to residual stress in assembly. The higher the CTE mismatch of the bonding components, the higher the maximum stress in the laser chip will result[6]. In order to minimize stress in the laser chip, soft solder like indium, which could reduce stress by plastic deformation, was historically dominant in die bonding where copper was used as the mounting substrate. But soft solder has been proven to be sensitive to thermal fatigue and electro-migration[7], in contrast to more reliable hard solder like eutectic gold-tin (AuSn) solder[8]. However, AuSn solder cannot be used to bond a laser chip directly to a copper heat sink due to the high residual stress that it leads to. In most cases, this problem could be solved by using the so-called submount between the copper heat sink and the semiconductor laser chip when using AuSn solder[9]. Submounts are usually made from materials differing little in CTE from the laser chips, but typically having a lower thermal conductivity than copper, leading to higher junction temperature and consequently deteriorated laser performance and shortened lifetime. The ideal submount would be highly thermally conductive and have CTE matched to the laser chip. In addition, it would be readily machined and available at low cost[10]. Therefore, efficient thermal and mechanical management of submounts are needed for higher power output as well as longer lifetime.

In this work, the CTE-matched submount was designed as the sandwiched structure shown in Figure 1. A low-CTE middle layer is sandwiched between two high-CTE surface layers. When layers with different CTE are bonded together, the material with lower CTE will restrict the expansion (contraction) of the higher CTE material during heating up (cooling down), leading to the effective CTE at mounting surface matched to the laser chip. This three-layer structure is symmetric in order to avoid the bowing deformation. In addition, the heat transfer performance is enhanced due to the heat-spreading effect of the surface layer with high thermal conductivity. This structure offers great flexibility in material choice and design. Also, the production is less sophisticated and expensive, with respect to carbon materials and metal-matrix composites mentioned in Reference [11].

Figure  1.  (Color online) Schematic diagram of the sandwich-structure submount.

Analytical solutions of thermal stress[12] and temperature distribution[13] are only available for simple models. Considering the complexity of model discussed here, the finite element method (FEM) was taken. All simulations were executed in a commercially available multiphysics finite element method solver, ANSYS 14.0. The detailed parameters required by mechanical and thermal simulations were listed in Table 1 and Table 2 respectively. The assembly comprises a laser diode, a submount, an F-mount copper heat sink. The laser diode under investigation is 5.5 × 0.5 × 0.105 mm3 GaAs-based chip. The F-mount copper heat sink is 8 × 22 × 2.5 mm3. The footprint of the submount is 5.75 × 4.5 mm2, and the thickness of different layers is variable for calculations. Materials of the middle layer discussed here include aluminum nitride (AlN), silicon carbide (SiC) and molybdenum (Mo). Copper was chosen as the surface material for the properties of high conductivity, high CTE and easy fabrication by electroplating on both sides of the middle sheets. For simplification, half of the assembly was simulated due to the symmetry in lateral direction.

Table  1.  Mechanical parameters in simulations.
MaterialCTE (ppm/K)Elastic modulus\par (GPa)Poission's ratioTensile stress (MPa)
GaAs6.0385.30.312-
AuSn16570.405275
In3212.70.451.88
Cu171300.35-
SiC4.24500.21-
AlN4.13080.26-
Mo4.93470.3-
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table
Table  2.  Detailed data on the structure and parameters of epitaxial layers.
LayerCompositionThickness (μm)Conductivity (W/m·K)
n-contactAu0.4318
n-contactAuGeNi0.2150
substrateGaAs10045
n-claddingAl0.36Ga0.64As1.212.52
n-waveguideAl0.25Ga0.75As0.6515.23
Quantum wellGa0.84In0.16As0.019.898
p-waveguideAl0.25Ga0.75As0.6515.23
p-claddingAl0.36Ga0.64As1.212.52
p-capGaAs0.245
Insulating layerSiO20.21.28
p-contactTi/Pt/Au0.3318
p-contactAu0.4318
SolderAuSn857
Submount-top-layerCuvariable398
Submount-middle-layerSiC300280
Submount-middle-layerAlN300200
Submount-middle-layerMo300142
Submount-bottom-layerCuvariable 398
Solder In1082
F-mountCu2500398
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

The stress of laser diodes can be induced from epitaxial growth, wafer processing, and die bonding[14]. The internal stress of the quantum well is caused by the lattice mismatch between the quantum well and bulk materials. In this paper, discussions were limited to stress which was introduced by die bonding process. Thus the laser chip was regarded as homogeneous material of GaAs. During packaging, the chip was firstly bonded with submount at 280 ℃ , the melting point of AuSn. Then the chip-submount assembly was connected with F-mount heat sink at 157 ℃ , using soft solder indium. Figures 2(a) and 2 (b) exhibit the stress intensity distribution before and after the secondary level packaging respectively. Comparison shows that, the maximum stress marked with "MX" in the pictures occurs at the interface between the surface and the middle layer of the submount. This mechanism releases the laser chip from excessive stress[15]. The secondary level package introduces little stress to the laser chip due to the ductile characteristic of indium. Therefore the mechanical simulations were focused on the submounts.

Figure  2.  (Color online) Stress intensity distribution of the assembly (a) before and (b) after secondary level package.
Figure  3.  Relationship between the CTE at the mounting surface of the submount and copper thickness. Meanwhile, (a) set material of middle layer as SiC, AlN, and Mo respectively, and fix the thickness at 0.3 mm; (b) change the thickness of SiC-middle layer from 0.2 to 0.3 mm, then to 0.4 mm. The straight line parallel to the x-axis indicates the CTE of GaAs (6.03 ppm/K). The open circles stand for structures CTE-matched with GaAs.

To obtain the CTE-matched structure of the submount, the average CTE at the mounting surface (the region where the laser chip is soldered) was calculated. The relative dependence of the effective CTE on the vertical structure and middle material are illustrated in Figure 4. Analysis of results leads us to the following conclusions:

Figure  4.  (Color online) (a) Temperature distribution of the coarse model. (b) Temperature distribution of the submodel.

(1) The interpolated copper thickness is 0.039 mm for 0.3-mm Mo, 0.055 mm for 0.3-mm AlN, 0.073 mm for 0.3-mm SiC, corresponding to the CTE-matched locations indicated by open circles. It follows that SiC allows coating with the thickest copper under CTE-matched condition. Considering the thermal conductivity of copper is larger than these materials, the submount based on SiC is expected to have a better cooling effect than others.

(2) The change of CTE is larger for submounts made of AlN than the other materials at the surface copper thickness in the range of 0-1.5 mm. The adjustment of copper to CTE is more effective for the material with lower CTE as well as lower elastic modulus.

(3) The CTE increases with copper getting thicker in a fitted parabolic way. The corresponding copper thickness is 0.048 mm for 0.2-mm SiC, 0.072 mm for 0.3-mm SiC, 0.096 mm for 0.4-mm SiC at CTE-matched points. If the middle layer is thicker, the coated copper should be thickened to the same multiples to keep a fixed value of CTE. The thickness ratio of surface copper to middle layer is considered to be a more general parameter for CTE calculations. Given the CTE and elastic modulus of materials, certain thickness ratio will yield corresponding effective CTE at mounting surface of submount. This could be taken as the principle for adjusting the effective CTE to match the laser chip.

In most cases, the thermal performance of laser diodes can be described by thermal resistance, which is defined as:

Rth=ΔTQ,

(1)

wherein ΔT stands for the temperature difference between the active region and the heat sink, while Q means the thermal load of laser diodes. The smaller Rth is, the better the thermal performance of the device is. To evaluate the heat-dissipating capability of the submounts, thermal resistance of the device was calculated. A laser diode of 55% electrical-to-optical conversion efficiency and 20 W output power level was chosen for thermal modeling. The emitting aperture of the laser was 100 μm. The active region was set to be the only heat source, due to nonradiative recombination and reabsorption of radiation, and the minor impact of Joule heat was ignored[16]. The convective cooling was presented at the exterior of the laser chip, the convection coefficient was taken as 25 W/(K·m) and the temperature of the air was 20 ℃. The lower basal plane of the copper F-mount was taken to be constant at 20 ℃, as the boundary condition.

In thermal analysis, the heat generation was limited in a small volume of the active region. Also, thermal conductivity of epitaxial layers differed a lot from each other. Thus regarding the laser chip as homogeneous material of GaAs like we did in mechanical simulations was not appropriate. Therefore, the detailed epitaxial structure was employed which is listed in Table 2. The main problem that made the model challenging was the extremely stiff aspect ratio. The active-region thickness is in nanometer scale while the device dimensions are in millimeter level. In order to solve the problem accurately, fine mesh would be required which demands too much memory. This problem was solved by "submodeling method" in this work. Finer mesh was created around the active region, and the bottom of the laser diode was used as the cut boundary which specified the calculated temperature of the coarse model as the boundary condition for the submodel. By this submodeling method, the thermal behavior of the assembly was simulated and shown in Figure 5. Figure 5(b) is the more accurate temperature distribution of the laser chip which is based on the coarse model in Figure 5.

Figure  5.  Relationship between the copper thickness and the thermal resistance of the assembly. (a) Setting material of middle layer as SiC, AlN, and Mo respectively. (b) Changing the thickness of SiC middle layer from 0.2 to 0.3, then to 0.4 mm.

The dependence of thermal resistance on the submount is demonstrated in Figure 5. From these results, some conclusions can be drawn:

(1) It is demonstrated in Figure 5(a) that, with the coated Cu increasing from 0 to 0.15 mm, thermal resistance decreased by 3% for the submount made of SiC, 7.6% for the submount made of AlN, 12.8% for the submount made of Mo. This means that the enhanced cooling effect of surface copper becomes stronger with the thermal conductivity of the middle material getting lower.

(2) When CTE-matched with GaAs, the Cu-SiC material combination provides the lowest thermal resistance. At CTE-matched open circles indicated in Figure 4(a), the interpolated thermal resistance for the SiC-based submount is 2.57 K/W, for the AlN-based submount is 2.74 K/W, and for the Mo-based submount is 2.91 K/W. Actually, the submount based on SiC keeps the lowest Rth over the whole range due to the highest thermal conductivity of SiC.

(3) Increasing the copper thickness enhances the heat-spreading effect and reduces the temperature of the active region, as would be expected. Thermal resistance decreases from 2.67 K/W at the surface copper thickness of 0 to 2.5 K/W at the surface copper thickness of 1.5 mm (when the middle layer is set to be 0.3-mm SiC). After the copper thickness exceeds 0.09 mm, thermal resistance decreases by less than 0.2% for every incremental step, indicating it is unreasonable to further thicken the surface copper for the middle-layer thickness in the range of 0.2-0.4 mm.

(4) Fixed surface thickness at 0.09 mm, thermal resistance increases from 2.49 K/W at the middle thickness of 0.2 mm to 2.52 K/W at the middle thickness of 0.3 mm, then to 2.56 K/W at the middle thickness of 0.4 mm. Because thickening the middle layer would increase the thermal path from the active layer to the F-mount, leading to temperature rising of the active region.

Sandwich-structure submounts for high-power single emitters were studied. The thermal expansion behavior and heat dissipating capability of submounts were simulated. The numerical results demonstrated that, effective CTE at mounting surface could be adjusted to match the laser chip by changing the thickness ratio of surface layer to middle layer. SiC is the most promising material candidate for the middle layer compared with AlN and Mo, from the view of thermal management. In the practical design of submounts, thicker copper and thinner middle material is preferred to minimize the junction temperature. However, the upper limit of this thickness ratio is determined by the CTE-matched requirements. Thus a good balance needs to be achieved to obtain reasonable CTE as well as efficient heat dissipation during the submounts' design. Further experiments are required to verify the effect of submounts on the output power and lifetime of high-power laser diodes.



[1]
Zhang Zhike, Liu Yu, Liu Jianguo, et al. Packaging investigation of optoelectronic devices. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(10):101001
[2]
Jing Hongqi, Zhong Li, Ni Yuxi, et al. Design and simulation of a novel high-efficiency cooling heat-sink structure using fluid-thermodynamics. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(10):102006
[3]
Liu Yang, Leung S Y Y, Wong C K Y, et al. Thermal simulation of flexible LED package enhanced with copper pillars. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(6):064011
[4]
Paul C, Erbert G, Wenzel H, et al. Efficient high-power laser diodes. IEEE J of Sel Topics Quantum Electron, 2013, 19(4):1501211
[5]
Pliska A C, Mottin J, Matuschek N, et al. Bonding semiconductor laser chips:substrate material figure of merit and die attach layer influence. THERMINIC 2005, 2005:76
[6]
Dirk L, Hennig P. Highly thermally conductive substrates with adjustable CTE for diode laser bar packaging. MEMS/MOEMS:Advances in Photonic Communications, sensing, Metrology, Packaging and Assembly Proc SPIE, 2003, 4945:174
[7]
Liu Xingsheng, Zhao Wei, Xiong Lingling, et al. Packaging high power semiconductor lasers. New York:Springer, 2015
[8]
Schleuning D, Griffin M, James P. Robust hard-solder packaging of conduction cooled laser diode bars. High-Power Diode Laser Technology and Applications V, Proc SPIE, 2007, 6456:645604
[9]
Bezotosnyi V V, Krokhin O N, Oleshchenko, et al. Thermal modelling of high-power laser diodes mounted using various types of submounts. Quantum Electronics, 2014, 44(10):899
[10]
Miller R, Liu D, Horsinka M, et al. Composite-copper, low-thermal-resistance heat sinks for laser-diode bars, mini-bars and single-emitter devices. High-Power Diode Laser Technology and Applications VI, Proc SPIE, 2008, 6876:687607
[11]
Kitzmantel M, Neubauer E. Innovative hybrid heat sink materials with high thermal conductivities and tailored CTE, Components and Packaging for Laser Systems, Proc SPIE, 2015, 9346:934606
[12]
Suhir E. Predictive analytical thermal stress modeling in electronics and photonics. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2009, 62(4):040801
[13]
Szymański M, Kozlowska A, Malag A, et al. Two-dimensional model of heat flow in broad-area laser diode mounted to a non-ideal heat sink. J Phys D, 2007, 40(3):924
[14]
Hostetler J L, Jiang C L, Negoita V, et al. Thermal and strain characteristics of high-power 940 nm laser arrays mounted with AuSn and In solders. High-Power Diode Laser Technology and Applications V, Proc SPIE, 2007, 6456:645602
[15]
Scholz C, Boucke K, Poprawe R. Mechanical stress-reducing heat sinks for high-power diode lasers. High-Power Diode Laser Technology and Applications Ⅱ, Proc SPIE, 2004, 5336:176
[16]
Szymanski M, Zbroszczyk M, Mroziewicz B. The influence of different heat sources on temperature distributions in broad-area diode lasers. Advanced Optoelectronics and Lasers, Proc SPIE, 2004, 5582:127
Fig. 1.  (Color online) Schematic diagram of the sandwich-structure submount.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) Stress intensity distribution of the assembly (a) before and (b) after secondary level package.

Fig. 3.  Relationship between the CTE at the mounting surface of the submount and copper thickness. Meanwhile, (a) set material of middle layer as SiC, AlN, and Mo respectively, and fix the thickness at 0.3 mm; (b) change the thickness of SiC-middle layer from 0.2 to 0.3 mm, then to 0.4 mm. The straight line parallel to the x-axis indicates the CTE of GaAs (6.03 ppm/K). The open circles stand for structures CTE-matched with GaAs.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) (a) Temperature distribution of the coarse model. (b) Temperature distribution of the submodel.

Fig. 5.  Relationship between the copper thickness and the thermal resistance of the assembly. (a) Setting material of middle layer as SiC, AlN, and Mo respectively. (b) Changing the thickness of SiC middle layer from 0.2 to 0.3, then to 0.4 mm.

Table 1.   Mechanical parameters in simulations.

MaterialCTE (ppm/K)Elastic modulus\par (GPa)Poission's ratioTensile stress (MPa)
GaAs6.0385.30.312-
AuSn16570.405275
In3212.70.451.88
Cu171300.35-
SiC4.24500.21-
AlN4.13080.26-
Mo4.93470.3-
DownLoad: CSV

Table 2.   Detailed data on the structure and parameters of epitaxial layers.

LayerCompositionThickness (μm)Conductivity (W/m·K)
n-contactAu0.4318
n-contactAuGeNi0.2150
substrateGaAs10045
n-claddingAl0.36Ga0.64As1.212.52
n-waveguideAl0.25Ga0.75As0.6515.23
Quantum wellGa0.84In0.16As0.019.898
p-waveguideAl0.25Ga0.75As0.6515.23
p-claddingAl0.36Ga0.64As1.212.52
p-capGaAs0.245
Insulating layerSiO20.21.28
p-contactTi/Pt/Au0.3318
p-contactAu0.4318
SolderAuSn857
Submount-top-layerCuvariable398
Submount-middle-layerSiC300280
Submount-middle-layerAlN300200
Submount-middle-layerMo300142
Submount-bottom-layerCuvariable 398
Solder In1082
F-mountCu2500398
DownLoad: CSV
[1]
Zhang Zhike, Liu Yu, Liu Jianguo, et al. Packaging investigation of optoelectronic devices. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(10):101001
[2]
Jing Hongqi, Zhong Li, Ni Yuxi, et al. Design and simulation of a novel high-efficiency cooling heat-sink structure using fluid-thermodynamics. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(10):102006
[3]
Liu Yang, Leung S Y Y, Wong C K Y, et al. Thermal simulation of flexible LED package enhanced with copper pillars. Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(6):064011
[4]
Paul C, Erbert G, Wenzel H, et al. Efficient high-power laser diodes. IEEE J of Sel Topics Quantum Electron, 2013, 19(4):1501211
[5]
Pliska A C, Mottin J, Matuschek N, et al. Bonding semiconductor laser chips:substrate material figure of merit and die attach layer influence. THERMINIC 2005, 2005:76
[6]
Dirk L, Hennig P. Highly thermally conductive substrates with adjustable CTE for diode laser bar packaging. MEMS/MOEMS:Advances in Photonic Communications, sensing, Metrology, Packaging and Assembly Proc SPIE, 2003, 4945:174
[7]
Liu Xingsheng, Zhao Wei, Xiong Lingling, et al. Packaging high power semiconductor lasers. New York:Springer, 2015
[8]
Schleuning D, Griffin M, James P. Robust hard-solder packaging of conduction cooled laser diode bars. High-Power Diode Laser Technology and Applications V, Proc SPIE, 2007, 6456:645604
[9]
Bezotosnyi V V, Krokhin O N, Oleshchenko, et al. Thermal modelling of high-power laser diodes mounted using various types of submounts. Quantum Electronics, 2014, 44(10):899
[10]
Miller R, Liu D, Horsinka M, et al. Composite-copper, low-thermal-resistance heat sinks for laser-diode bars, mini-bars and single-emitter devices. High-Power Diode Laser Technology and Applications VI, Proc SPIE, 2008, 6876:687607
[11]
Kitzmantel M, Neubauer E. Innovative hybrid heat sink materials with high thermal conductivities and tailored CTE, Components and Packaging for Laser Systems, Proc SPIE, 2015, 9346:934606
[12]
Suhir E. Predictive analytical thermal stress modeling in electronics and photonics. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2009, 62(4):040801
[13]
Szymański M, Kozlowska A, Malag A, et al. Two-dimensional model of heat flow in broad-area laser diode mounted to a non-ideal heat sink. J Phys D, 2007, 40(3):924
[14]
Hostetler J L, Jiang C L, Negoita V, et al. Thermal and strain characteristics of high-power 940 nm laser arrays mounted with AuSn and In solders. High-Power Diode Laser Technology and Applications V, Proc SPIE, 2007, 6456:645602
[15]
Scholz C, Boucke K, Poprawe R. Mechanical stress-reducing heat sinks for high-power diode lasers. High-Power Diode Laser Technology and Applications Ⅱ, Proc SPIE, 2004, 5336:176
[16]
Szymanski M, Zbroszczyk M, Mroziewicz B. The influence of different heat sources on temperature distributions in broad-area diode lasers. Advanced Optoelectronics and Lasers, Proc SPIE, 2004, 5582:127
1

Rational molecular passivation for high-performance perovskite light-emitting diodes

Jingbi You

Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(4): 040203. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/4/040203

2

Fabrication of room temperature continuous-wave operation GaN-based ultraviolet laser diodes

Degang Zhao, Jing Yang, Zongshun Liu, Ping Chen, Jianjun Zhu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(5): 051001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/5/051001

3

GaN-based green laser diodes

Lingrong Jiang, Jianping Liu, Aiqin Tian, Yang Cheng, Zengcheng Li, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(11): 111001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/11/111001

4

A susceptor with a Λ-shaped slot in a vertical MOCVD reactor by induction heating

Zhiming Li, Hailing Li, Xiaobing Gan, Haiying Jiang, Jinping Li, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(9): 092003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/9/092003

5

Thermal analysis of remote phosphor in LED modules

Mingzhi Dong, Jia Wei, Huaiyu Ye, Cadmus Yuan, Kouchi Zhang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(5): 053007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/5/053007

6

Effect of varying layouts on the gate temperature for multi-finger AlGaN/GaN HEMTs

Wang Jianhui, Wang Xinhua, Pang Lei, Chen Xiaojuan, Jin Zhi, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(9): 094004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/9/094004

7

A review of passive thermal management of LED module

Ye Huaiyu, Sau Koh, Henk van Zeijl, A. W. J. Gielen, Zhang Guoqi, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(1): 014008. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/1/014008

8

High-temperature characteristics of AlxGa1–xN/GaN Schottky diodes

Zhang Xiaoling, Li Fei, Lu Changzhi, Xie Xuesong, Li Ying, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(3): 034001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/3/034001

9

A 1.8 V LDO voltage regulator with foldback current limit and thermal protection

Liu Zhiming, Fu Zhongqian, Huang Lu, Xi Tianzuo

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 085007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/085007

10

Thermal analysis and test for single concentrator solar cells

Cui Min, Chen Nuofu, Yang Xiaoli, Wang Yu, Bai Yiming, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(4): 044011. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/4/044011

11

Finite element analysis of the temperature field in a vertical MOCVD reactor by induction heating

Li Zhiming, Xu Shengrui, Zhang Jincheng, Chang Yongming, Ni Jingyu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(11): 113004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/11/113004

12

Thermal Simulation and Analysis of High Power Flip-Chip Light-Emitting Diode System

Wang Libin, Liu Zhiqiang, Chen Yu, Yi Xiaoyan, Ma Long, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(S1): 504-508.

13

Impact of Transition-Metal Contamination on Oxygen Precipitation in Czochralski Silicon Under Rapid Thermal Processing

Wu Dongdong, Yang Deren, Xi Zhenqiang, Que Duanlin

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(3): 413-418.

14

Thermal Fatigue Life Time Prediction of Sn-3.5Ag Lead-Free SolderJoint for Chip Scale Package

Han Xiao, Ding Han, Sheng Xinjun, Zhang Bo

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(9): 1695-1700.

15

Axial Local Lifetime Control in High-Voltage Diodes Based on Proximity Gettering of Platinum by Proton-Implantation Damages

Jia Yunpeng, Zhang Bin, Sun Yuechen, Kang Baowei

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(2): 294-297.

16

Analysis of Si/GaAs Bonding Stresses with the FiniteElement Method

He Guorong, Yang Guohua, Zheng Wanhua, Wu Xuming, Wang Xiaodong, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(11): 1906-1910.

17

High-Power Distributed Feedback Laser Diodes Emitting at 820nm

Fu Shenghui, Zhong Yuan, Song Guofeng, Chen Lianghui

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(6): 966-969.

18

Design and Realization of Resonant Tunneling Diodes with New Material Structure

Wang Jianlin, Wang Liangchen, Zeng Yiping, Liu Zhongli, Yang Fuhua, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(1): 1-5.

19

AIN Monolithic Microchannel Cooled Heatsink for High Power Laser Diode Array

Ma Jiehui, Fang Gaozhan, Lan Yongsheng and, Ma Xiaoyu

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(3): 476-479.

20

Material Growth and Device Fabrication of GaN-Based Blue-Violet Laser Diodes

Yang Hui, Chen Lianghui, Zhang Shuming, Chong Ming, Zhu Jianjun, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(2): 414-417.

1. Wang, J., Jiang, K., Yue, X. et al. Research on hybrid processing of silicon carbide based on laser cutting. Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2025, 40(3): 035009. doi:10.1088/1361-6641/ada9c8
2. Li, Z., Tan, J., Li, J. et al. A review on thermal management of light-emitting diodes: From package-level to system-level. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124145
3. Yue, Y., Wang, B., Wang, X. et al. Study on die-bonding of single emitter high power laser diodes. Optical Engineering, 2022, 61(3): 036101. doi:10.1117/1.OE.61.3.036101
4. Xu, P., Wang, B., Wang, Y. et al. Study and optimization of die-bonding technology for semiconductor lasers based on differential-analysis. Optik, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166632
5. Ma, Z., Lin, T., Zhao, R. et al. Research on Thermal Analysis Modeling of Semiconductor Laser Based on Package Prototype | [基 于 封 装 原 型 的 半 导 体 激 光 器 热 分 析 建 模 研 究]. Laser and Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(23): 2314003. doi:10.3788/LOP202158.2314003
6. Yue, Y., Wang, X., Wang, Y. et al. Study on bonding of single bar high power semiconductor lasers. Journal of Modern Optics, 2021, 68(15): 777-783. doi:10.1080/09500340.2021.1943027
7. Li, X., Jiang, K., Zhu, Z. et al. High-brightness 808 nm semiconductor laser diode packaged by SiC heat sink. Journal of Modern Optics, 2020, 67(11): 1017-1021. doi:10.1080/09500340.2020.1810339
8. Jiang, L., Zhang, L., Liu, Z.-Q. Optimal Design of Co/In/Cu Sputtering Target Assembly Using Finite Element Method and Taguchi Method. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2019, 32(11): 1407-1414. doi:10.1007/s40195-019-00875-6
9. Liu, C.-C., Jing, H.-Q., Ni, Y.-X. et al. Design of 915 nm/974 nm Single-emitter Laser Diode Fiber-coupled Module | [915 nm/974 nm单发射区半导体激光器光纤耦合模块设计]. Faguang Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Luminescence, 2018, 39(11): 1598-1603. doi:10.3788/fgxb20183911.1598
10. Jing, H.-Q., Ni, Y.-X., Liu, Q.-K. et al. Performance of Semiconductor Laser Devices Packaged by Different AuSn Solder Composition | [AuSn焊料组分对半导体激光器件性能的影响]. Faguang Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Luminescence, 2018, 39(6): 850-854. doi:10.3788/fgxb20183906.0850
11. Liu, C.-C., Wang, X., Jing, H.-Q. et al. Design of Fiber-coupled Laser Diode Module Based on Three-wavelengths Multiplexing by ZEMAX | [三波长合束单管激光器光纤耦合模块设计]. Faguang Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Luminescence, 2018, 39(3): 337-342. doi:10.3788/fgxb20183903.0337
12. Liu, Q.-K., Kong, J.-X., Zhu, L.-N. et al. Failure Mode Analysis of High-power Laser Diodes by Electroluminescence. Faguang Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Luminescence, 2018, 39(2): 180-187. doi:10.3788/fgxb20183902.0180
13. Liu, C., Wang, C., Wang, X. et al. Design of double wavelengths fiber coupled module of semiconductor diode laser by ZEMAX. Hongwai yu Jiguang Gongcheng/Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2018, 47(1): 0105002. doi:10.3788/IRLA201847.0105002
14. Ni, Y., Jing, H., Kong, J. et al. Thermal Performance of High-Power Laser Diodes Packaged by SiC Ceramic Submount. Zhongguo Jiguang/Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2018, 45(1): 0101002. doi:10.3788/CJL201845.0101002
15. Wang, X., Zhao, Y.-H., Wang, C.-L. et al. 110 W High Power and High Brightness 915 nm Fiber Coupled Laser Diode Module. Faguang Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Luminescence, 2017, 38(12): 1654-1660. doi:10.3788/fgxb20173812.1654
16. Wang, W.-Z., Jing, H.-Q., Qi, Q. et al. Reliability test and failure analysis of high power semicounductor laser. Faguang Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Luminescence, 2017, 38(2): 165-169. doi:10.3788/fgxb20173802.0165
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Yuxi Ni, Xiaoyu Ma, Hongqi Jing, Suping Liu. Finite element analysis of expansion-matched submounts for high-power laser diodes packaging[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(6): 064005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064005
    Y X Ni, X Y Ma, H Q Jing, S P Liu. Finite element analysis of expansion-matched submounts for high-power laser diodes packaging[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(6): 064005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064005.
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 3906 Times PDF downloads: 71 Times Cited by: 16 Times

    History

    Received: 12 October 2015 Revised: 13 January 2016 Online: Published: 01 June 2016

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Yuxi Ni, Xiaoyu Ma, Hongqi Jing, Suping Liu. Finite element analysis of expansion-matched submounts for high-power laser diodes packaging[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(6): 064005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064005 ****Y X Ni, X Y Ma, H Q Jing, S P Liu. Finite element analysis of expansion-matched submounts for high-power laser diodes packaging[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(6): 064005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064005.
      Citation:
      Yuxi Ni, Xiaoyu Ma, Hongqi Jing, Suping Liu. Finite element analysis of expansion-matched submounts for high-power laser diodes packaging[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(6): 064005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064005 ****
      Y X Ni, X Y Ma, H Q Jing, S P Liu. Finite element analysis of expansion-matched submounts for high-power laser diodes packaging[J]. J. Semicond., 2016, 37(6): 064005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064005.

      Finite element analysis of expansion-matched submounts for high-power laser diodes packaging

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/6/064005
      More Information
      • Corresponding author: Email: jinghq@semi.ac.cn
      • Received Date: 2015-10-12
      • Revised Date: 2016-01-13
      • Published Date: 2016-06-01

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return