J. Semicond. > 2024, Volume 45 > Issue 7 > 072401

ARTICLES

A peak enhancement of frequency response of waveguide integrated silicon-based germanium avalanche photodetector

Linkai Yi1, 2, Daoqun Liu1, Wenzheng Cheng1, 2, Daimo Li1, 2, Guoqi Zhou1, 2, Peng Zhang1, Bo Tang1, Bin Li1, Wenwu Wang1, Yan Yang1 and Zhihua Li1,

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Zhihua Li, lizhihua@ime.ac.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/24020006

PDF

Turn off MathJax

Abstract: Avalanche photodetectors (APDs) featuring an avalanche multiplication region are vital for reaching high sensitivity and responsivity in optical transceivers. Waveguide-coupled Ge-on-Si separate absorption, charge, and multiplication (SACM) APDs are popular due to their straightforward fabrication process, low optical propagation loss, and high detection sensitivity in optical communications. This paper introduces a lateral SACM Ge-on-Si APD on a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer, featuring a 10 μm-long, 0.5 μm-wide Ge layer at 1310 nm on a standard 8-inch silicon photonics platform. The dark current measures approximately 38.6 μA at −21 V, indicating a breakdown voltage greater than −21 V for the device. The APDs exhibit a unit-gain responsivity of 0.5 A/W at −10 V. At −15 V, their responsivity reaches 2.98 and 2.91 A/W with input powers of −10 and −25 dBm, respectively. The device's 3-dB bandwidth is 15 GHz with an input power of −15 dBm and a gain is 11.68. Experimental results show a peak in impedance at high bias voltages, attributed to inductor and capacitor (LC) circuit resonance, enhancing frequency response. Furthermore, 20 Gbps eye diagrams at −21 V and −9 dBm input power reveal signal to noise ratio (SNRs) of 5.30. This lateral SACM APD, compatible with the stand complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process, shows that utilizing the peaking effect at low optical power increases bandwidth.

Key words: photodetectorsoptical communicationsresponsivity3-dB bandwidth

The growing popularity of AI, internet of things, cloud computing, and multimedia has increased the demand for optical communication with high transmission rates, large bandwidths, long distances, high security, low loss, EMI resistance, and low cost[1, 2]. Integrated photonics mainly relies on two platforms: indium phosphide (InP) and silicon photonics (SiPh). InP platforms can integrate both passive and active components, like lasers, amplifiers, and photodetectors[3]. However, SiPh has a distinct advantage over InP in its compatibility with advanced CMOS technologies, leading to lower costs and higher production volumes. SiPh is used in terahertz generation, high rate signal detecting, potential neuromorphic computing[4], optical switches[5, 6], light detection and ranging (LIDAR)[79], and optical sensing[1012]. Photodetectors, converting optical signals into electrical ones, are crucial for the wide spread application of 1310 nm optical communication.

Currently, ethernet systems with capacities such as 400 G/800 GBASE and beyond are essential for supporting rapidly expanding applications. For example, while current 4 × 100 Gb/s photodiode (PD) receivers suit 10 km applications, their range drops to 2 km when data rates reach to 200 Gb/s per lane[1214]. Moreover, as relay distances and the number of access network users increase, link losses reduce the optical power at the user end, necessitating higher sensitivity. Consequently, p−i−n and metal−semiconductor−metal (MSM) photodetectors cannot meet high-rate requirements[1518]. APDs featuring an avalanche region significantly enhance receiver sensitivity[19]. The impact ionization ratio, affecting sensitivity and reducing excess noise, ranges from 0.01 to 0.1 in silicon. This makes Ge-on-Si APDs perform better than most Ⅲ−Ⅴ APDs[2023]. Furthermore, Ge-on-Si APDs are compatible with CMOS technology and cost-effective, thanks to their raw material composition.

Recent efforts have aimed at enhancing Ge-on-Si APDs' performance. For instance, Huang et al. added an silicon layer to control the electrical field distribution at O-band, the result shows that 3dB-bandwidth is 56 GHz, and the responsivity is 1.08 A/W[24]. Zeng et al. studied the impact of voltages and input powers on 3-dB bandwidth, employing an effective equivalent voltage for a quantitative analysis[25]. Zhang et al. discovered that surface defects and strong electric fields at the sidewalls lead to significant leakage currents[26]. SACM Ge-on-Si APDs get more attention. Studies show that vertical SACM Ge-on-Si APDs operate effectively at voltages below −10 V[22, 27, 28]. Fabricating these APDs involves silicon epitaxial growth and the addition of metal electrodes in the germanium layer which will reduce the primary responsivity. In contrast, lateral SACM Ge-on-Si APDs are emerging, eliminating the need for silicon epitaxy growth and metal contact steps. Some studies have focused on increasing the device's bandwidth by etching shallow trenches on the left and right sides of the Ge[2931]. These devices exhibit low responsivity at unit gain and high dark current. Additionally, controlling the doping region for designs narrower than 100 nm is challenging[30]. Efforts to improve absorption efficiency have achieved a 3-dB bandwidth of 48 GHz and a high primary responsivity of 0.93 A/W[32]. Furthermore, Li et al. have extended the 3-dB bandwidth to 75 GHz using inductive-gain-peaking technology[33]. Lischke et al. utilized a Fin structure in germanium to achieve a 3-dB bandwidth to 265 GHz[4]. Chowdhury et al. demonstrated a lateral SACM Ge-on-Si APD whose responsivity at the bias voltage of 5 V is 26 A/W. Peng et al. showcased all-Si 20 Gb/s avalanche photodiodes with a responsivity exceeding 65 A/W[34]. Zhang et al. were the first to use an InGaAs/InAlAs APD on a silicon platform, achieving a gain exceeding 70 at 1570 nm[35].

This paper introduces a lateral SACM Ge-on-Si APD. Designed for compatibility with the CMOS process at 1310 nm, the device utilizes a simplified standard process. Experiments were conducted to measure both the photocurrent and dark current of the detector. Responsivity and gain were meticulously calculated. Additionally, comprehensive analyses of bandwidth and eye diagrams were conducted. The results show a unit-gain responsivity of 0.5 A/W for the APD. At a 15 V bias voltage, responsivities of 2.98, 3.11, 3.01, and 2.91 A/W were observed for input optical powers of −10, −15, −20, and −25 dBm, respectively. Additionally, the 3-dB bandwidth at high bias voltages was discussed. Finally, the eye diagrams at 20 and 10 Gbps are obtained.

Fig. 1 illustrates a 3D schematic and top layer layout of the waveguide-integrated lateral SACM Ge-on-Si APD structure on a 0.18 μm silicon platform, featuring a p-type <100> top Si layer with a 220 nm layer and a 3 μm thick buried oxide (BOX). The SACM structure is designed because Ge's bandgap matches the 1310 nm optical communication band, and silicon's ionization coefficient is much less than 1, reducing device noise and increasing the gain-bandwidth product. Ideally, the electric field should be maintained between 1 × 104 and 2 × 105 V/cm. If too high, it causes the Ge layer to multiply and produce excess noise; if too low, it affects the drift of photogenerated carriers in silicon at the saturation rate[36, 37]. The 0.2 μm wide multiplication region is located between the Pul (P-type ultra-low doping) charge layer and the P-type doped region. A Ge-epi layer, 0.5 μm wide and 10 μm long, serves as the absorption layer. For enhanced visual clarity, a portion of the device's structure is magnified in Fig. 1(b).

Fig. 1.  (Color online) (a) 3D perspective view for SACM Ge-on-Si APD; (b) top-down perspective of the mask layout in the fabrication process for the device.

Fig. 2 illustrates the vital fabrication steps of the device using the 180 nm MPW process. The APD design process can be summarized as follows: Firstly, in Fig. 2(a), the channel waveguide and grating were created through dry etching to depths of 220 and 70 nm, respectively. To support single mode, the strip waveguide's width is designed to be 450 nm. To reduce scattering loss and increase waveguide edge smoothness, high temperature annealing is required after etching[38, 39]. The period and duty of the designed grating are 490 nm and 0.5, respectively. Secondly, Fig. 2(b) shows that five-step ion implantation completes the charge layer and ohmic contact doping. The doping dose of the charge region is 1.2 × 1012 cm−2 with a width of it is 0.25 μm, designed to enlarge the high electric field in silicon layer. P-ohmic and n-ohmic doping, with boron and phosphorus respectively, involve three steps each, with doping dose of 1012−1015 cm−2. Thirdly, preparation of germanium epitaxy in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d). After growing a polyethylene oxide (PEOX) layer, rapid thermal annealing (RTA) activates and repairs injected impurities and any injection-induced damage. A 500 nm diameter circular hole is created through lithography and etching. Fourthly, after cleaning, the reduced pressure chemical vapor deposition (RPCVD) growth method is typically used to deposit Ge[40, 41]. The depths of the Ge layer and the waveguide are 365.2 and 220 nm, respectively. Due to the uneven thin film layer, chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is necessary to smooth the Ge epitaxial surface. Due to the device's lateral structure, there is no need for ion doping on germanium. Additionally, the lateral structure's lack of contact electrodes simplifies the process and prevents light signal scattering and absorption by electrodes in germanium. Fifthly, tungsten plug and AlCu preparation can be seen in Fig. 2(e). After cleaning, a Ni film is deposited inside the contact hole by physical sputtering. High-temperature annealing then forms a nickel-germanium alloy to reduce contact resistance. A Ti/TiN layer is also deposited to enhance adhesion between the tungsten plug and the hole's inner wall, preventing tungsten diffusion. Since tungsten is difficult to remove by plasma, CMP technology is used for its removal, forming the tungsten plug. Afterward, the wafer is transferred to the PVD equipment for AlCu alloy deposition, followed by a TiN alloy layer to prevent aluminum electromigration and serve as a reflective layer for lithography. Sixthly, M2 completion is shown in Fig. 2(f). Finally, the wafer is annealed at 400 °C in an anaerobic nitrogen atmosphere.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) The main steps for waveguide-coupled lateral SACM Ge-on-Si APD. (a) Etching waveguides and gratings on the top 220 nm Si layer; (b) five steps of ion implantation; (c) open the Ge window; (d) growth and smooth of germanium layer; (e) M1 finished; (f) M2 finished and annealing.

Fig. 3(a) shows the SEM of the waveguide, the width of the waveguide is 448 nm, which is within the process tolerance range. Fig. 3(b) displays the whole SEM of the grating, while Fig. 3(c) shows the enlarged view with a period and duty cycle of 486 nm and almost 0.5, respectively. Fig. 4 shows FIB view of the complete morphology of the device after finishing all preparation steps, and the depths of the Ge layer is 365.2 nm.

Fig. 3.  (a) SEM image of waveguide; (b) overall SEM plot of a grating; (c) SEM image of further enlarge of grating.
Fig. 4.  (Color online) Focused ion beam (FIB) view of the device’s structure.

Fig. 5 illustrates IV curves of the device at 1310 nm with the input power between −10 to −25 dBm measured at room temperature. The APD breakdown voltage was defined when the current reaches 100 μA[22, 42]. At −21 V, the corresponding dark current is 38.6 μA, due to the source meter unit, so the breakdown voltage |VBD | > −21 V. In the dark IV curves, the value of the initial dark current is unstable, which is mainly because the DC measurement system leakage current and additional parasitic capacitance. The value goes up from −0.7 to −8.8 V. At −8.8 V, the corresponding dark current is 1.12 nA. At low bias voltage, the dark current is low, because the electric field is mostly generated in silicon layer, so the dak current mainly comes from Shockley−Read−Hall generation and tunning[17, 43]. Subsequently, it further increases with voltage from −8.7 to −18 V. There are many factors that cause the dark current to rise. In this case, it is mainly the germanium−silicon interfacial electric field that plays a major role. As the voltage continues to increase, the dark current rapid rises, mainly because of the multiplication noise in APDs. The lattice mismatch between the germanium and silicon interface is approximately 4.2, which leads to numerous mismatches and threaded dislocation arrays, resulting in relatively high dark currents. Changes were made in the geometrical shape[18], growth temperature, and annealing conditions of Ge to enhance epitaxial growth[44, 45].

Fig. 5.  (Color online) Measured the dark and photo current IV curves with input optical powers varying.

The photocurrent was experimental at the bias voltage ranging from 0 to −21 V. The measured photocurrent of the APDs is about 8.6 nA at 0 V and goes up quickly to 1.13 μA at −2.4 V with the input optical powers of −10 dBm. The germanium−silicon interface potential difference needs to be overcome[46, 47]. The photodetector increases with the voltage goes up, mainly because of the more carrier collection efficiency and avalanche multiplication. The photocurrent is 0.10 mA at −11.9 V, it shows further increase, this process is accompanied by the depletion of germanium region. At a voltage of 11.9 V, the photodetector registers a current of 0.1 mA, and it continues to increase. This process is associated with the depletion of the germanium region. When the voltage is much larger than −12 V, the photodetector increases result from the enhanced avalanche multiplication. When photodetector current reaches 100 μA, the bias voltage is 11.9, 15.3, 20.7, >21 V for the input optical powers of −10, −15, −20, −25 dBm, respectively. As the optical power increases, the photocurrent increases.

Fig. 6 shows the responsivity and gain against the reverse bias for four different input optical powers. The responsivity is the ratio of photocurrent (light current−dark current) to input power. The input optical power is the power in the APD. The multiplication gain is recognized as the ratio of the multiplied photocurrent R(V) to the primary photocurrent R0. The formula is G = R(V)/R0. The responsivity increases with the bias voltage increases. In the voltage range from 0 to −10 V, the responsivity remains below 0.5 A/W, a larger energy barrier needs to be overcome compared to pure silicon detectors, thus limiting the collection of carriers[43]. The growth quality of germanium epitaxy in Fig. 4, affects not only the electric field in the germanium region but also Ge-on-Si interface. At the heterogeneous interface of the germanium and silicon layers, the two types of atoms diffuse into each other, leading to a significantly reduced light absorption coefficient and hence low responsivity. The unit-gain responsivity is 0.5 A/W at −10 V, and the gain is assumed to be 1. As the voltage increases, the responsivity increases rapidly due to the avalanche effect. For instance, at −15 V, the responsivity is 2.98, 3.11, 3.01, 2.91 A/W for input optical powers of −10, −15, −20, −25 dBm, respectively. At −21 V, the responsivity increases to 4.84, 5.84, 7.62, 8.76 A/W at the optical power of −10, −15, −20, −25 dBm, respectively. Accordingly, as the bias voltage increases, the gain increases too in Fig. 6(b). For example, at −21 V, the gain is 9.68, 11.68, 15.24, 17.52 with the input optical power of −10, −15, −20, −25 dBm, respectively.

Fig. 6.  (Color online) (a) Calculated responsivity with the input optical power of −10, −15, −20, −25 dBm; (b) calculated multiplication gain with the input optical power of −10, −15, −20, −25 dBm.

To calculate the 3-dB bandwidth of the current Ge-on-Si APDs, the experimental setup for bandwidth characterization closely resembles the one described in paper[48]. The measurements circumstance is the same with the static measurements. Figs. 7(a)−7(c) depict the experimental frequency responses at varying bias voltages with the optical power of −10, −15, −20 dBm, respectively. Fig. 7(d) illustrates how the device's bandwidth changes at voltages ranging from −18 to −21 V and under three different incident optical power levels. At bias voltages between 0 and 18 V, the responsivity and gain are relatively low, because the built-in electric field is low, so electron−hole pairs cannot be effectively collected. Due to the low value, these results are not displayed in Fig. 7 at bias voltages between 0 and 18 V. As the voltage increases, the bandwidth also increases. However, at this point, the germanium absorption layer has not been fully depleted, leading to a longer transit time due to slow carrier diffusion. The bandwidth reaches its maximum at 20 V, as depicted in Fig. 7(d). As further increase in voltage, the 3-dB bandwidth decreases due to the accumulation of avalanche effects. At this stage, the time at which avalanche is initiated becomes a significant factor influencing the bandwidth[32, 43, 49, 50]. As the optical power decreases, for example, at −20 dBm, the observed peak enhancement in the frequency response, which is attributed to the LC resonance effect in avalanche region. This effect is the cause of the peak enhancement in the frequency response[33, 51, 21]. Furthermore, under high bias voltage, the peak is further amplified.

Fig. 7.  (Color online) Frequency responses with bias voltages varying from 18 to 21 V, (a) the optical power of −10 dBm, (b) the optical power of −15 dBm, (c) the optical power of −20 dBm, (d) measured 3 dB bandwidth under different optical powers at the bias voltage varying from 10 to 21 V from small signal measurements.

Fig. 8 shows the equivalent circuit of the present waveguide SCAM APD. In this circuit, the RC circuit is used to model the transit time of the absorber. An LC-circuit (LA and CA) is used for the avalanche region. The pad is the impedance of the APD with the parasitic effects, including the inductance Lp, the capacitance Cp, and the resistance Rp. At high bias voltages, avalanche effect is more obvious than the capacitance in absorber region, so the peak value becomes larger, at a certain frequency, the impedance of the APD has a maximal value. We use "peak value" to demonstrate the effect, the peak value is a positive value above the line of normalized S21 = 0.

Fig. 8.  (Color online) The equivalent circuit of the present waveguide SCAM APD.

Fig. 9 is the setup for eye-diagram measurements, an arbitrary waveform generator (AWG) used to give a test signal, the high-speed oscilloscope tests the state of the device. The light from a 1310 nm laser passed through PC1 and was then modulated by a Mach–Zehnder modulator (MZM). The modulated light was sent into the unpackaged device under test (DUT) via PC2. A bias-tee was also employed in this setup. We used an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) and a tunable filter to boost the signal then it reached into the APD. A sampling oscilloscope captures the output electrical signal. Fig. 10 displays the eye diagrams at 10 and 20 Gb/s at −21 V. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) decreases at higher data rates due to vertical eye closure.

Fig. 9.  (Color online) Schematic of the experimental setup for the measurement of eye diagrams. The gray and red lines represent the optical and electrical paths, respectively.
Fig. 10.  Experimental eye diagrams of the device at the bias voltage of 21 V. (a) At a 20 Gbps with the input optical power of −9 dBm; (b) at a 10 Gbps with input optical power of −9 dBm.

Table 1 gives a benchmarking table of Ge-on-Si APDs, we compared the performance of the surface illuminated type device and the waveguide coupled device, meanwhile, the wavelength bands of 1310 and 1550 nm are shown in the table. In Table 1, compared with surface-illuminated APDs, the waveguide-coupled APDs have higher 3-dB bandwidths and more prominent responsivity[40]. Some waveguide-type APDs were with vertical SACM structures and thus require complicated fabrication processes. While, since there is no need for the silicon epitaxy growth and the metal contacts on the Ge layer, the lateral SACM APD structures have an easier fabrication process[30, 32]. This makes it very promising for integrating other functional devices (modulators, filters, etc.). The experiment result of present APD shows that at −21 V, the dark current measures approximately 38.6 μA, indicating the breakdown voltage for APD operation is greater than −21 V. The results show that in multiplication region the electrical field is weak, so a larger voltage is needed to induce avalanche or design a proper charge layer used technology computer aided design (TCAD). Furthermore, the APD shows a primary responsivity of 0.5 A/W, it is mainly caused by germanium epitaxy and metal absorption. We compared the peak value, in our work, the value is larger than 6, which is much larger than that is reported in article[33]. In actual production for APD device, the relationship between the bandwidth and eye diagram should be considered comprehensively[33].

Table 1.  Benchmarking table of the waveguide Ge-on-Si APDs.
Type PN type Λ
(nm)
Id
(nA)
R0
(A/W)
Bandwidth
(GHz)
Peak
value
Year
Surface illuminated Vertical SACM 1550 30 0.30 8.0 / 2012[52]
Waveguide Lateral PIN 1550 600 0.49 33 / 2020[43]
Waveguide Vertical PIN 1550 20 0.8 21.0 / 2021[44]
Waveguide Lateral SACM 1310 ~30 0.65 22.7 / 2021[30]
Waveguide Vertical SACM 1310 1 0.75 29.5 / 2021[53]
Waveguide Lateral RT 1310 ~100 0.93 48.0 / 2022[32]
Waveguide Vertical 1550 35 0.81 >75 <3 2023[33]
Waveguide Lateral SACM 1310 38.6 0.5 15 >6 This work
Note: “/” indicates that the article does not mention this parameter.
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

A waveguide-integrated lateral SACM Ge-on-Si APD using simplified fabrication processes with CMOS technology was studied. The device exhibits a primary responsivity of approximately 0.5 A/W at −10 V at O-band. Due to the source meter unit's limitations, at −21 V, the dark current is approximately 38.6 μA, suggesting that the APD's breakdown voltage exceeds −21 V. The discussion above details why the device shows a high breakdown voltage at the same dark current level. Concurrently, the device's 3-dB bandwidth is 15 GHz, achieved with the optical power of −15 dBm and a gain of 11.68. The 3-dB bandwidth curve shows that with low optical power, the peak bandwidth increases with rising voltage, which is more obvious at a higher voltage. This may lead to an increase in bandwidth. Finally, we performed the eye diagram test. The results indicate that at higher data rates, the SNR decreases due to vertical eye closure.

The author acknowledges Dr. Daoqun Liu from Pengcheng Lab, Shenzhen, China, for his valuable advice on characterization. Additionally, the author thanks Hengzhen Cao from the International Research Center for Advanced Photonics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, for assistance in setting up the tests.



[1]
Wang B H, Mu J F. High-speed Si-Ge avalanche photodiodes. PhotoniX, 2022, 3, 8 doi: 10.1186/s43074-022-00052-6
[2]
Liu D Q. Study on the near-infrared COMS compatible avalanche photodetector. PhD Dissertation, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022 (in Chinese)
[3]
Smit M, Williams K, van der Tol J. Past, present, and future of InP-based photonic integration. APL Photonics, 2019, 4, 050901 doi: 10.1063/1.5087862
[4]
Lischke S, Peczek A, Morgan J S, et al. Ultra-fast germanium photodiode with 3-dB bandwidth of 265 GHz. Nat Photon, 2021, 15, 925 doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00893-w
[5]
Wu G, Cao H, Jin M, et al. 2×2 SOI optical switch with robust high extinction ratio on all paths enabled by parabolic MMI coupler. 2023 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference/ 2023 International Photonics and Optoelectronics Meetings (ACP/POEM), 2023, 1 doi: 10.1109/ACP/POEM59049.2023.10369772
[6]
Xia J F, Chen M J, Rizzo A, et al. O-band microring resonator based switch-and-select silicon photonic switch fabric. 2022 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO), 2022, 1 doi: 10.1364/CLEO_SI.2022.SF4M.7
[7]
Qian L, Wu D, Liu D, et al. Infrared detector module for airborne hyperspectral LiDAR: Design and demonstration. Appl Opt, 2023, 62, 2161 doi: 10.1364/AO.482626
[8]
Lin Y X, Ahmad Z, Ou S Y, et al. A 4-D FMCW LiDAR with ultra-high velocity sensitivity. J Lightwave Technol, 2023, 41, 6664 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2023.3292139
[9]
Liu X B, Li X T, Zhi Z H, et al. Three-electrode germanium-on-silicon avalanche photodiode array. Opt Lett, 2023, 48, 1846 doi: 10.1364/OL.477463
[10]
Giden I H. Photonic crystal based interferometric design for label-free all-optical sensing applications. Opt Express, 2022, 30, 21679 doi: 10.1364/OE.458772
[11]
Romijn J, Vollebregt S, Middelburg L M, et al. Integrated 64 pixel UV image sensor and readout in a silicon carbide CMOS technology. Microsyst Nanoeng, 2022, 8, 114 doi: 10.1038/s41378-022-00446-3
[12]
Lai Y H, Suh M G, Lu Y K, et al. Earth rotation measured by a chip-scale ring laser gyroscope. Nat Photonics, 2020, 14, 345 doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0588-y
[13]
Tian Y, Lin Y X, Zheng J Y, et al. 800Gb/s-FR4 specification and interoperability analysis. 2021 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), 2021, 1 doi: 10.1364/OFC.2021.W7F.6
[14]
Potet J, Simon G, Gaillard G, et al. Uncooled high speed Ge/Si avalanche photodiode for 50 Gbit/s-PON with 60 km reach. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2023, 2023, 1 doi: 10.1364/OFC.2023.Th3G.3
[15]
Assefa S, Xia F N, Vlasov Y A. Reinventing germanium avalanche photodetector for nanophotonic on-chip optical interconnects. Nature, 2010, 464, 80 doi: 10.1038/nature08813
[16]
Assefa S, Xia F N, Bedell S W, et al. CMOS-integrated high-speed MSM germanium waveguide photodetector. Opt Express, 2010, 18, 4986 doi: 10.1364/OE.18.004986
[17]
Benedikovic D, Virot L, Aubin G, et al. 25 Gbps low-voltage hetero-structured silicon-germanium waveguide pin photodetectors for monolithic on-chip nanophotonic architectures. Photon Res, 2019, 7, 437 doi: 10.1364/PRJ.7.000437
[18]
Benedikovic D, Virot L, Aubin G, et al. Comprehensive study on chip-integrated germanium pin photodetectors for energy-efficient silicon interconnects. IEEE J Quantum Electron, 2020, 56, 8400409 doi: 10.1109/JQE.2019.2954355
[19]
Campbell J C. Recent advances in avalanche photodiodes. J Light Technol, 2016, 34, 278 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2015.2453092
[20]
Wang B H, Huang Z H, Zeng X G, et al. A compact model for Si—Ge avalanche photodiodes. 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on Group IV Photonics (GFP). Cancun, Mexico. IEEE, 2018, 1 doi: 10.1109/GROUP4.2018.8478743
[21]
Wang B H, Huang Z H, Zeng X G, et al. 35Gb/s ultralow-voltage three-terminal Si-Ge avalanche photodiode. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2019, 2019, 1
[22]
Zeng X G, Huang Z H, Wang B H, et al. Silicon–germanium avalanche photodiodes with direct control of electric field in charge multiplication region. Optica, 2019, 6, 772 doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.6.000772
[23]
Samani A, Carpentier O, El-Fiky E, et al. Highly sensitive, 112 gb/s O-band waveguide coupled silicon-germanium avalanche photodetectors. 2019 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC). San Diego, CA, USA. IEEE, 2019, 1
[24]
Huang M Y, Cai P F, Li S, et al. 56GHz waveguide Ge/Si avalanche photodiode. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2018, 1
[25]
Zeng Q Y, Pan Z X, Zeng Z H, et al. Space charge effects on the bandwidth of Ge/Si avalanche photodetectors. Semicond Sci Technol, 2020, 35, 035026 doi: 10.1088/1361-6641/ab7147
[26]
Zhang J Q, Lin H M, Liu M, et al. Research on the leakage current at sidewall of mesa Ge/Si avalanche photodiode. AIP Adv, 2021, 11, 075320 doi: 10.1063/5.0054242
[27]
Huang Z H, Li C, Liang D, et al. 25 Gbps low-voltage waveguide Si–Ge avalanche photodiode. Optica, 2016, 3, 793 doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000793
[28]
Wang B H, Huang Z H, Zeng X G, et al. A compact model for Si-Ge avalanche photodiodes over a wide range of multiplication gain. J Light Technol, 2019, 37, 3229 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2019.2913179
[29]
Srinivasan S A, Berciano M, De Heyn P, et al. 27 GHz silicon-contacted waveguide-coupled Ge/Si avalanche photodiode. J Light Technol, 2020, 38, 3044 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2020.2986923
[30]
Srinivasan S A, Lambrecht J, Guermandi D, et al. 56 gb/s NRZ O-band hybrid BiCMOS-silicon photonics receiver using Ge/si avalanche photodiode. J Lightwave Technol, 2021, 39, 1409 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2020.3038361
[31]
Xiang Y L, Cao H Z, Liu C Y, et al. High-performance waveguide Ge/Si avalanche photodiode with a lateral separate-absorption-charge-multiplication structure. Opt Express, 2022, 30, 11288 doi: 10.1364/OE.450618
[32]
Xiang Y L, Cao H Z, Liu C Y, et al. High-speed waveguide Ge/Si avalanche photodiode with a gain-bandwidth product of 615 GHz. Optica, 2022, 9, 762 doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.462609
[33]
Li X L, Zhu Y P, Liu Z, et al. 75 GHz germanium waveguide photodetector with 64 Gbps data rates utilizing an inductive-gain-peaking technique. J Semicond, 2023, 44, 012301 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/1/012301
[34]
Peng Y W, Yuan Y, Sorin W V, et al. Demonstration of an ultra-high-responsivity all-silicon avalanche photodetectors. 2023 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC). San Diego, CA, USA, 2023, 1 doi: 10.1364/OFC.2023.W1A.2
[35]
Zhang J S, Xu H W, Tan K H, et al. First Si-waveguide-integrated InGaAs/InAlAs avalanche photodiodes on SOI platform. 2022 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology and Circuits (VLSI Technology and Circuits). Honolulu, HI, USA, 2022, 409 doi: 10.1109/VLSITechnologyandCir46769.2022.9830481
[36]
Decker D R, Dunn C N. Determination of germanium ionization coefficients from small-signal IMPATT diode characteristics. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 1970, 17, 290 doi: 10.1109/T-ED.1970.16972
[37]
Chen H T, Verheyen P, De Heyn P, et al. High-responsivity low-voltage 28-gb/s Ge p-i-n photodetector with silicon contacts. J Lightwave Technol, 2015, 33, 820 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2014.2367134
[38]
Bellegarde C, Pargon E, Sciancalepore C, et al. Optimization of H2 thermal annealing process for the fabrication of ultra-low loss sub-micron silicon-on-insulator rib waveguides. Silicon Photonics XIII. San Francisco, USA. SPIE, 2018, 1 doi: 10.1117/12.2289564
[39]
Bellegarde C, Pargon E, Sciancalepore C, et al. Improvement of sidewall roughness of sub-micron silicon-on-insulator waveguides for low-loss on-chip links. Silicon Photonics XII, 2017, 10108, 1010816 doi: 10.1117/12.2250344
[40]
Michel J, Liu J F, Kimerling L C. High-performance Ge-on-Si photodetectors. Nature Photon, 2010, 4, 527 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.157
[41]
Lee K H, Bao S Y, Chong G Y, et al. Defects reduction of Ge epitaxial film in a germanium-on-insulator wafer by annealing in oxygen ambient. APL Mater, 2015, 3, 016102 doi: 10.1063/1.4905487
[42]
Hu X, Zhang H G, Wu D Y, et al. High-performance germanium avalanche photodetector for 100 Gbit/s photonics receivers. Opt Lett, 2021, 46, 3837 doi: 10.1364/OL.433694
[43]
Benedikovic D, Virot L, Aubin G, et al. 40 Gbps heterostructure germanium avalanche photo receiver on a silicon chip. Optica, 2020, 7, 775 doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.393537
[44]
Filippov V, Mitsuk S, Vlasov A, et al. Modelling of deformations and band diagram of semiconductor hetorostructure silicon-germanium. 2023 5th International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency (SUMMA). Lipetsk, Russian Federation, 2023, 1081 doi: 10.1109/SUMMA60232.2023.10349379
[45]
Reboud V, Gassenq A, Hartmann J M, et al. Germanium based photonic components toward a full silicon/germanium photonic platform. Prog Cryst Growth Charact Mater, 2017, 63, 1 doi: 10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2017.04.004
[46]
Rockwell A K, Yuan Y, Jones A H, et al. Al0.8In0.2As0.23Sb0.77 avalanche photodiodes. IEEE Photon Technol Lett, 2018, 30, 1048 doi: 10.1109/LPT.2018.2826999
[47]
Liu D Q, Zhang P, Tang B, et al. High-performance waveguide-integrated Ge/Si avalanche photodetector with lateral multiplication region. Micromachines, 2022, 13, 649 doi: 10.3390/mi13050649
[48]
Yi L K, Liu D Q, Li D M, et al. Waveguide-integrated Ge/Si avalanche photodiode with vertical multiplication region for 1310 nm detection. Photonics, 2023, 10, 750 doi: 10.3390/photonics10070750
[49]
Yuan Y, Huang Z H, Zeng X G, et al. High responsivity Si-Ge waveguide avalanche photodiodes enhanced by loop reflector. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2022, 28, 1 doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2022.3206066
[50]
Emmons R B. Avalanche-photodiode frequency response. J Appl Phys, 1967, 38, 3705 doi: 10.1063/1.1710199
[51]
Dai D X, Rodwell M J W, Bowers J E, et al. Derivation of the small signal response and equivalent circuit model for a separate absorption and multiplication layer avalanche photodetector. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2010, 16, 1328 doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2038497
[52]
Duan N, Liow T Y, Lim A E J, et al. 310 GHz gain-bandwidth product Ge/Si avalanche photodetector for 1550 nm light detection. Opt Express, 2012, 20, 11031 doi: 10.1364/OE.20.011031
[53]
Huang M Y, Magruder K, Malinge Y, et al. Recess-type waveguide integrated germanium on silicon avalanche photodiode. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2021, 2021, 1 doi: 10.1364/OFC.2021.F2C.3
Fig. 1.  (Color online) (a) 3D perspective view for SACM Ge-on-Si APD; (b) top-down perspective of the mask layout in the fabrication process for the device.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) The main steps for waveguide-coupled lateral SACM Ge-on-Si APD. (a) Etching waveguides and gratings on the top 220 nm Si layer; (b) five steps of ion implantation; (c) open the Ge window; (d) growth and smooth of germanium layer; (e) M1 finished; (f) M2 finished and annealing.

Fig. 3.  (a) SEM image of waveguide; (b) overall SEM plot of a grating; (c) SEM image of further enlarge of grating.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) Focused ion beam (FIB) view of the device’s structure.

Fig. 5.  (Color online) Measured the dark and photo current IV curves with input optical powers varying.

Fig. 6.  (Color online) (a) Calculated responsivity with the input optical power of −10, −15, −20, −25 dBm; (b) calculated multiplication gain with the input optical power of −10, −15, −20, −25 dBm.

Fig. 7.  (Color online) Frequency responses with bias voltages varying from 18 to 21 V, (a) the optical power of −10 dBm, (b) the optical power of −15 dBm, (c) the optical power of −20 dBm, (d) measured 3 dB bandwidth under different optical powers at the bias voltage varying from 10 to 21 V from small signal measurements.

Fig. 8.  (Color online) The equivalent circuit of the present waveguide SCAM APD.

Fig. 9.  (Color online) Schematic of the experimental setup for the measurement of eye diagrams. The gray and red lines represent the optical and electrical paths, respectively.

Fig. 10.  Experimental eye diagrams of the device at the bias voltage of 21 V. (a) At a 20 Gbps with the input optical power of −9 dBm; (b) at a 10 Gbps with input optical power of −9 dBm.

Table 1.   Benchmarking table of the waveguide Ge-on-Si APDs.

Type PN type Λ
(nm)
Id
(nA)
R0
(A/W)
Bandwidth
(GHz)
Peak
value
Year
Surface illuminated Vertical SACM 1550 30 0.30 8.0 / 2012[52]
Waveguide Lateral PIN 1550 600 0.49 33 / 2020[43]
Waveguide Vertical PIN 1550 20 0.8 21.0 / 2021[44]
Waveguide Lateral SACM 1310 ~30 0.65 22.7 / 2021[30]
Waveguide Vertical SACM 1310 1 0.75 29.5 / 2021[53]
Waveguide Lateral RT 1310 ~100 0.93 48.0 / 2022[32]
Waveguide Vertical 1550 35 0.81 >75 <3 2023[33]
Waveguide Lateral SACM 1310 38.6 0.5 15 >6 This work
Note: “/” indicates that the article does not mention this parameter.
DownLoad: CSV
[1]
Wang B H, Mu J F. High-speed Si-Ge avalanche photodiodes. PhotoniX, 2022, 3, 8 doi: 10.1186/s43074-022-00052-6
[2]
Liu D Q. Study on the near-infrared COMS compatible avalanche photodetector. PhD Dissertation, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022 (in Chinese)
[3]
Smit M, Williams K, van der Tol J. Past, present, and future of InP-based photonic integration. APL Photonics, 2019, 4, 050901 doi: 10.1063/1.5087862
[4]
Lischke S, Peczek A, Morgan J S, et al. Ultra-fast germanium photodiode with 3-dB bandwidth of 265 GHz. Nat Photon, 2021, 15, 925 doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00893-w
[5]
Wu G, Cao H, Jin M, et al. 2×2 SOI optical switch with robust high extinction ratio on all paths enabled by parabolic MMI coupler. 2023 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference/ 2023 International Photonics and Optoelectronics Meetings (ACP/POEM), 2023, 1 doi: 10.1109/ACP/POEM59049.2023.10369772
[6]
Xia J F, Chen M J, Rizzo A, et al. O-band microring resonator based switch-and-select silicon photonic switch fabric. 2022 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO), 2022, 1 doi: 10.1364/CLEO_SI.2022.SF4M.7
[7]
Qian L, Wu D, Liu D, et al. Infrared detector module for airborne hyperspectral LiDAR: Design and demonstration. Appl Opt, 2023, 62, 2161 doi: 10.1364/AO.482626
[8]
Lin Y X, Ahmad Z, Ou S Y, et al. A 4-D FMCW LiDAR with ultra-high velocity sensitivity. J Lightwave Technol, 2023, 41, 6664 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2023.3292139
[9]
Liu X B, Li X T, Zhi Z H, et al. Three-electrode germanium-on-silicon avalanche photodiode array. Opt Lett, 2023, 48, 1846 doi: 10.1364/OL.477463
[10]
Giden I H. Photonic crystal based interferometric design for label-free all-optical sensing applications. Opt Express, 2022, 30, 21679 doi: 10.1364/OE.458772
[11]
Romijn J, Vollebregt S, Middelburg L M, et al. Integrated 64 pixel UV image sensor and readout in a silicon carbide CMOS technology. Microsyst Nanoeng, 2022, 8, 114 doi: 10.1038/s41378-022-00446-3
[12]
Lai Y H, Suh M G, Lu Y K, et al. Earth rotation measured by a chip-scale ring laser gyroscope. Nat Photonics, 2020, 14, 345 doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0588-y
[13]
Tian Y, Lin Y X, Zheng J Y, et al. 800Gb/s-FR4 specification and interoperability analysis. 2021 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), 2021, 1 doi: 10.1364/OFC.2021.W7F.6
[14]
Potet J, Simon G, Gaillard G, et al. Uncooled high speed Ge/Si avalanche photodiode for 50 Gbit/s-PON with 60 km reach. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2023, 2023, 1 doi: 10.1364/OFC.2023.Th3G.3
[15]
Assefa S, Xia F N, Vlasov Y A. Reinventing germanium avalanche photodetector for nanophotonic on-chip optical interconnects. Nature, 2010, 464, 80 doi: 10.1038/nature08813
[16]
Assefa S, Xia F N, Bedell S W, et al. CMOS-integrated high-speed MSM germanium waveguide photodetector. Opt Express, 2010, 18, 4986 doi: 10.1364/OE.18.004986
[17]
Benedikovic D, Virot L, Aubin G, et al. 25 Gbps low-voltage hetero-structured silicon-germanium waveguide pin photodetectors for monolithic on-chip nanophotonic architectures. Photon Res, 2019, 7, 437 doi: 10.1364/PRJ.7.000437
[18]
Benedikovic D, Virot L, Aubin G, et al. Comprehensive study on chip-integrated germanium pin photodetectors for energy-efficient silicon interconnects. IEEE J Quantum Electron, 2020, 56, 8400409 doi: 10.1109/JQE.2019.2954355
[19]
Campbell J C. Recent advances in avalanche photodiodes. J Light Technol, 2016, 34, 278 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2015.2453092
[20]
Wang B H, Huang Z H, Zeng X G, et al. A compact model for Si—Ge avalanche photodiodes. 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on Group IV Photonics (GFP). Cancun, Mexico. IEEE, 2018, 1 doi: 10.1109/GROUP4.2018.8478743
[21]
Wang B H, Huang Z H, Zeng X G, et al. 35Gb/s ultralow-voltage three-terminal Si-Ge avalanche photodiode. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2019, 2019, 1
[22]
Zeng X G, Huang Z H, Wang B H, et al. Silicon–germanium avalanche photodiodes with direct control of electric field in charge multiplication region. Optica, 2019, 6, 772 doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.6.000772
[23]
Samani A, Carpentier O, El-Fiky E, et al. Highly sensitive, 112 gb/s O-band waveguide coupled silicon-germanium avalanche photodetectors. 2019 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC). San Diego, CA, USA. IEEE, 2019, 1
[24]
Huang M Y, Cai P F, Li S, et al. 56GHz waveguide Ge/Si avalanche photodiode. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2018, 1
[25]
Zeng Q Y, Pan Z X, Zeng Z H, et al. Space charge effects on the bandwidth of Ge/Si avalanche photodetectors. Semicond Sci Technol, 2020, 35, 035026 doi: 10.1088/1361-6641/ab7147
[26]
Zhang J Q, Lin H M, Liu M, et al. Research on the leakage current at sidewall of mesa Ge/Si avalanche photodiode. AIP Adv, 2021, 11, 075320 doi: 10.1063/5.0054242
[27]
Huang Z H, Li C, Liang D, et al. 25 Gbps low-voltage waveguide Si–Ge avalanche photodiode. Optica, 2016, 3, 793 doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000793
[28]
Wang B H, Huang Z H, Zeng X G, et al. A compact model for Si-Ge avalanche photodiodes over a wide range of multiplication gain. J Light Technol, 2019, 37, 3229 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2019.2913179
[29]
Srinivasan S A, Berciano M, De Heyn P, et al. 27 GHz silicon-contacted waveguide-coupled Ge/Si avalanche photodiode. J Light Technol, 2020, 38, 3044 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2020.2986923
[30]
Srinivasan S A, Lambrecht J, Guermandi D, et al. 56 gb/s NRZ O-band hybrid BiCMOS-silicon photonics receiver using Ge/si avalanche photodiode. J Lightwave Technol, 2021, 39, 1409 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2020.3038361
[31]
Xiang Y L, Cao H Z, Liu C Y, et al. High-performance waveguide Ge/Si avalanche photodiode with a lateral separate-absorption-charge-multiplication structure. Opt Express, 2022, 30, 11288 doi: 10.1364/OE.450618
[32]
Xiang Y L, Cao H Z, Liu C Y, et al. High-speed waveguide Ge/Si avalanche photodiode with a gain-bandwidth product of 615 GHz. Optica, 2022, 9, 762 doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.462609
[33]
Li X L, Zhu Y P, Liu Z, et al. 75 GHz germanium waveguide photodetector with 64 Gbps data rates utilizing an inductive-gain-peaking technique. J Semicond, 2023, 44, 012301 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/1/012301
[34]
Peng Y W, Yuan Y, Sorin W V, et al. Demonstration of an ultra-high-responsivity all-silicon avalanche photodetectors. 2023 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC). San Diego, CA, USA, 2023, 1 doi: 10.1364/OFC.2023.W1A.2
[35]
Zhang J S, Xu H W, Tan K H, et al. First Si-waveguide-integrated InGaAs/InAlAs avalanche photodiodes on SOI platform. 2022 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology and Circuits (VLSI Technology and Circuits). Honolulu, HI, USA, 2022, 409 doi: 10.1109/VLSITechnologyandCir46769.2022.9830481
[36]
Decker D R, Dunn C N. Determination of germanium ionization coefficients from small-signal IMPATT diode characteristics. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 1970, 17, 290 doi: 10.1109/T-ED.1970.16972
[37]
Chen H T, Verheyen P, De Heyn P, et al. High-responsivity low-voltage 28-gb/s Ge p-i-n photodetector with silicon contacts. J Lightwave Technol, 2015, 33, 820 doi: 10.1109/JLT.2014.2367134
[38]
Bellegarde C, Pargon E, Sciancalepore C, et al. Optimization of H2 thermal annealing process for the fabrication of ultra-low loss sub-micron silicon-on-insulator rib waveguides. Silicon Photonics XIII. San Francisco, USA. SPIE, 2018, 1 doi: 10.1117/12.2289564
[39]
Bellegarde C, Pargon E, Sciancalepore C, et al. Improvement of sidewall roughness of sub-micron silicon-on-insulator waveguides for low-loss on-chip links. Silicon Photonics XII, 2017, 10108, 1010816 doi: 10.1117/12.2250344
[40]
Michel J, Liu J F, Kimerling L C. High-performance Ge-on-Si photodetectors. Nature Photon, 2010, 4, 527 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.157
[41]
Lee K H, Bao S Y, Chong G Y, et al. Defects reduction of Ge epitaxial film in a germanium-on-insulator wafer by annealing in oxygen ambient. APL Mater, 2015, 3, 016102 doi: 10.1063/1.4905487
[42]
Hu X, Zhang H G, Wu D Y, et al. High-performance germanium avalanche photodetector for 100 Gbit/s photonics receivers. Opt Lett, 2021, 46, 3837 doi: 10.1364/OL.433694
[43]
Benedikovic D, Virot L, Aubin G, et al. 40 Gbps heterostructure germanium avalanche photo receiver on a silicon chip. Optica, 2020, 7, 775 doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.393537
[44]
Filippov V, Mitsuk S, Vlasov A, et al. Modelling of deformations and band diagram of semiconductor hetorostructure silicon-germanium. 2023 5th International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency (SUMMA). Lipetsk, Russian Federation, 2023, 1081 doi: 10.1109/SUMMA60232.2023.10349379
[45]
Reboud V, Gassenq A, Hartmann J M, et al. Germanium based photonic components toward a full silicon/germanium photonic platform. Prog Cryst Growth Charact Mater, 2017, 63, 1 doi: 10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2017.04.004
[46]
Rockwell A K, Yuan Y, Jones A H, et al. Al0.8In0.2As0.23Sb0.77 avalanche photodiodes. IEEE Photon Technol Lett, 2018, 30, 1048 doi: 10.1109/LPT.2018.2826999
[47]
Liu D Q, Zhang P, Tang B, et al. High-performance waveguide-integrated Ge/Si avalanche photodetector with lateral multiplication region. Micromachines, 2022, 13, 649 doi: 10.3390/mi13050649
[48]
Yi L K, Liu D Q, Li D M, et al. Waveguide-integrated Ge/Si avalanche photodiode with vertical multiplication region for 1310 nm detection. Photonics, 2023, 10, 750 doi: 10.3390/photonics10070750
[49]
Yuan Y, Huang Z H, Zeng X G, et al. High responsivity Si-Ge waveguide avalanche photodiodes enhanced by loop reflector. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2022, 28, 1 doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2022.3206066
[50]
Emmons R B. Avalanche-photodiode frequency response. J Appl Phys, 1967, 38, 3705 doi: 10.1063/1.1710199
[51]
Dai D X, Rodwell M J W, Bowers J E, et al. Derivation of the small signal response and equivalent circuit model for a separate absorption and multiplication layer avalanche photodetector. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2010, 16, 1328 doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2038497
[52]
Duan N, Liow T Y, Lim A E J, et al. 310 GHz gain-bandwidth product Ge/Si avalanche photodetector for 1550 nm light detection. Opt Express, 2012, 20, 11031 doi: 10.1364/OE.20.011031
[53]
Huang M Y, Magruder K, Malinge Y, et al. Recess-type waveguide integrated germanium on silicon avalanche photodiode. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2021, 2021, 1 doi: 10.1364/OFC.2021.F2C.3
1

Calculation of the carrier dynamics and impedance spectroscopy model in quantum well infrared photodetectors

Chenzhe Hu, Yuyu Bu, Xianying Dai, Fengqiu Jiang, Yue Hao, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2025, 46(3): 032403. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24090033

2

Review on three-dimensional graphene: synthesis and joint photoelectric regulation in photodetectors

Bingkun Wang, Jinqiu Zhang, Huijuan Wu, Fanghao Zhu, Shanshui Lian, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/25010015

3

Two-step growth of β-Ga2O3 on c-plane sapphire using MOCVD for solar-blind photodetector

Peipei Ma, Jun Zheng, Xiangquan Liu, Zhi Liu, Yuhua Zuo, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2024, 45(2): 022502. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/45/2/022502

4

75 GHz germanium waveguide photodetector with 64 Gbps data rates utilizing an inductive-gain-peaking technique

Xiuli Li, Yupeng Zhu, Zhi Liu, Linzhi Peng, Xiangquan Liu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(1): 012301. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/1/012301

5

A new 3-dB bandwidth record of Ge photodiode on Si

Zhi Liu, Chuanbo Li, Buwen Cheng

Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(6): 060202. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/6/060202

6

High-frequency characterization of high-speed modulators and photodetectors in a link with low-speed photonic sampling

Mengke Wang, Shangjian Zhang, Zhao Liu, Xuyan Zhang, Yutong He, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(4): 042303. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/4/042303

7

Growth of aligned SnS nanowire arrays for near infrared photodetectors

Guozhen Shen, Haoran Chen, Zheng Lou

Journal of Semiconductors, 2020, 41(4): 042602. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/4/042602

8

Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides for lead halide perovskites-based photodetectors: band alignment investigation for the case of CsPbBr3/MoSe2

Le Huang, Nengjie Huo, Zhaoqiang Zheng, Huafeng Dong, Jingbo Li, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2020, 41(5): 052206. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/5/052206

9

Optical properties of Zn-diffused InP layers for the planar-type InGaAs/InP photodetectors

Guifeng Chen, Mengxue Wang, Wenxian Yang, Ming Tan, Yuanyuan Wu, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(12): 124004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/12/124004

10

Strain effect on intersubband transitions in rolled-up quantum well infrared photodetectors

Han Wang, Shilong Li, Honglou Zhen, Xiaofei Nie, Gaoshan Huang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(5): 054006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/5/054006

11

Photodetectors based on two dimensional materials

Zheng Lou, Zhongzhu Liang, Guozhen Shen

Journal of Semiconductors, 2016, 37(9): 091001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/37/9/091001

12

A different approach for determining the responsivity of n+p detectors using scanning electron microscopy

Omeime Xerviar Esebamen, Göran Thungström, Hans-Erik Nilsson

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(7): 074002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/7/074002

13

Optical properties in 1D photonic crystal structure using Si/C60 multilayers

Chen Jing, Tang Jiyu, Han Peide, Chen Junfang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(4): 043001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/4/043001

14

Design and simulation of blue/violet sensitive photodetectors in silicon-on-insulator

Han Zhitao, Chu Jinkui, Meng Fantao, Jin Rencheng

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(10): 104008. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/10/104008

15

A monolithic, standard CMOS, fully differential optical receiver with an integrated MSM photodetector

Yu Changliang, Mao Luhong, Xiao Xindong, Xie Sheng, Zhang Shilin, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(10): 105010. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/10/105010

16

Facile fabrication of UV photodetectors based on ZnO nanorod networks across trenched electrodes

Li Yingying, Cheng Chuanwei, Dong Xiang, Gao Junshan, Zhang Haiqian, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(6): 063004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/6/063004

17

9μm Cutoff 128×128 AlGaAs/GaAs Quantum Well Infrared Photodetector Focal Plane Arrays

Li Xianjie, Liu Yingbin, Feng Zhen, Guo Fan, Zhao Yonglin, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(8): 1355-1359.

18

Study of Uni-Traveling-Carrier Photodetectors

Zhu Haobo, Mao Luhong, 杨展, Yang Zhan, 张世林, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(11): 2019-2024.

19

Fabrication of 1.55μm Si-Based Resonant Cavity Enhanced Photodetectors

Mao Rongwei, Zuo Yuhua, Li Chuanbo, Cheng Buwen, Teng Xuegong, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(2): 271-275.

20

Novel Type of Wide-Bandwidth GaAs/AlGaAs Infrared Photodetectors

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2000, 21(7): 630-636.

1. Zhou, Z., Li, J., Jia, M. et al. Study on the Influence of Sn Concentration on Non-Substitutional Defect Concentration and Sn Surface Segregation in GeSn Alloys. Molecules, 2025, 30(9): 1875. doi:10.3390/molecules30091875
2. Wang, X., Xu, H., Ren, Y. et al. Advances in implantable capsule robots for monitoring and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. Materials Science and Engineering R: Reports, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.mser.2025.100943
3. Liu, X., Huang, Q., Zheng, J. et al. High-quality germanium-lead nanosheets grown directly on silicon substrate by lead-catalyzed method. Applied Surface Science, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.161975
4. Wang, Z., Jiang, X., Meng, W. et al. High-gain Ge/Si Avalanche Photodetector with Stable Operation Temperature up to 500 K. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2025. doi:10.1109/LED.2025.3558575
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Linkai Yi, Daoqun Liu, Wenzheng Cheng, Daimo Li, Guoqi Zhou, Peng Zhang, Bo Tang, Bin Li, Wenwu Wang, Yan Yang, Zhihua Li. A peak enhancement of frequency response of waveguide integrated silicon-based germanium avalanche photodetector[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2024, 45(7): 072401. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24020006
    L K Yi, D Q Liu, W Z Cheng, D M Li, G Q Zhou, P Zhang, B Tang, B Li, W W Wang, Y Yang, and Z H Li, A peak enhancement of frequency response of waveguide integrated silicon-based germanium avalanche photodetector[J]. J. Semicond., 2024, 45(7), 072401 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24020006
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 1194 Times PDF downloads: 180 Times Cited by: 4 Times

    History

    Received: 19 February 2024 Revised: 14 March 2024 Online: Accepted Manuscript: 25 March 2024Uncorrected proof: 26 March 2024Published: 15 July 2024

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Linkai Yi, Daoqun Liu, Wenzheng Cheng, Daimo Li, Guoqi Zhou, Peng Zhang, Bo Tang, Bin Li, Wenwu Wang, Yan Yang, Zhihua Li. A peak enhancement of frequency response of waveguide integrated silicon-based germanium avalanche photodetector[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2024, 45(7): 072401. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24020006 ****L K Yi, D Q Liu, W Z Cheng, D M Li, G Q Zhou, P Zhang, B Tang, B Li, W W Wang, Y Yang, and Z H Li, A peak enhancement of frequency response of waveguide integrated silicon-based germanium avalanche photodetector[J]. J. Semicond., 2024, 45(7), 072401 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24020006
      Citation:
      Linkai Yi, Daoqun Liu, Wenzheng Cheng, Daimo Li, Guoqi Zhou, Peng Zhang, Bo Tang, Bin Li, Wenwu Wang, Yan Yang, Zhihua Li. A peak enhancement of frequency response of waveguide integrated silicon-based germanium avalanche photodetector[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2024, 45(7): 072401. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24020006 ****
      L K Yi, D Q Liu, W Z Cheng, D M Li, G Q Zhou, P Zhang, B Tang, B Li, W W Wang, Y Yang, and Z H Li, A peak enhancement of frequency response of waveguide integrated silicon-based germanium avalanche photodetector[J]. J. Semicond., 2024, 45(7), 072401 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24020006

      A peak enhancement of frequency response of waveguide integrated silicon-based germanium avalanche photodetector

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/24020006
      More Information
      • Linkai Yi got her BS from Henan University of Technology in 2015. Now she is a PhD student at Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences under the supervision of Prof. Zhihua Li. Her research focus on waveguide integrated germanium on silicon avalanche photodetectors
      • Zhihua Li got his BS degree in 1998 at Central South University and PhD degree in 2006 at Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Then he joined Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences until now. In 2011, he awarded the CSC funding to study in Georgia Institute of Technology. His research interests include silicon photonics, photodetectors, modulator
      • Corresponding author: lizhihua@ime.ac.cn
      • Received Date: 2024-02-19
      • Revised Date: 2024-03-14
      • Available Online: 2024-03-25

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return