Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2024, Volume 45 > Issue 11 > 112301

ARTICLES

Design and characterization of a multi-ring nested CMUT array for hydrophone

Licheng Jia, Rihui Xue and Fansheng Meng

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Licheng Jia, jialicheng@nuc.edu.cn

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/24060007

PDF

Turn off MathJax

Abstract: This paper presents the design, fabrication, packaging, and characterization of a high-performance CMUT array. The array, which features rectangular cells fabricated using a sacrificial release process, achieves a receiving sensitivity of −231.44 dB (re: 1 V/μPa) with a 40 dB gain. Notably, the CMUT array exhibits a minimal sensitivity variation of just 0.87 dB across a temperature range of 0 to 60 °C. Furthermore, the output voltage non-linearity at 1 kHz is approximately 0.44%. These test results demonstrate that the reception performance of the 67-element CMUT array is superior to that of commercial transducers. The high performance and compact design of this CMUT array underscore its significant commercial potential for hydrophone applications.

Key words: cmut arraymirco-electro-mechanical systems (mems)receiving sensitivitynon-linearity

Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers (CMUTs) have emerged as a pivotal technology in the field of underwater acoustics, particularly in the development of hydrophones. Hydrophones, specialized acoustic sensors designed for underwater applications, are essential tools for detecting and converting underwater sound waves into electrical signals with high precision[16]. They play a crucial role in diverse fields such as marine biology, underwater navigation, and seismic monitoring. Traditionally, hydrophones have relied on piezoelectric materials to convert sound waves into electrical signals[710]. However, with the advent of MEMS technology, CMUTs offer a compelling alternative. CMUT-based hydrophones provide numerous advantages over conventional piezoelectric hydrophones, including smaller size, lower manufacturing cost, and better environmental adaptability[1113]. These benefits are particularly significant in the challenging underwater environment where pressure and density can vary widely.

CMUTs operate on the principle of electrostatic transduction, where a membrane and a fixed electrode form a capacitor[14, 15]. When an acoustic wave causes the membrane to vibrate, the capacitance changes, producing an electrical signal. This method offers several advantages: CMUTs can achieve higher bandwidth and sensitivity, and their working principle results in lower harmonics, reducing imaging artifacts and enhancing signal quality.

In marine biology, CMUT-based hydrophones can be used to study the communication and behavior of marine mammals, capturing vocalizations that provide insight into species' social structures and habits. In underwater navigation, they are integral to advanced sonar systems that map the ocean floor and ensure the safe passage of vessels. For seismic monitoring, CMUT hydrophones can detect and analyze subtle seismic activities, contributing to our understanding of tectonic movements and the assessment of earthquake risks beneath the ocean floor.

This paper introduces the design and implementation of a CMUT-based hydrophone array for underwater acoustic applications. A systematic design study was conducted to achieve an optimal sensing structure and overall performance. The CMUT array was fabricated using a sacrificial release process, with sensing cells designed in an innovative multi-ring nested structure. The performance of the CMUT array was thoroughly evaluated against industry-standard piezoelectric hydrophones. The results indicate that the CMUT array demonstrates superior performance in several key areas, including bandwidth, sensitivity, and non-linearity. These findings highlight the potential of CMUT-based hydrophones to revolutionize underwater acoustic sensing, offering significant improvements over traditional technologies. The enhanced capabilities of CMUT hydrophones promise to expand our understanding of underwater environments and improve the effectiveness of applications ranging from marine research to seismic monitoring and beyond.

Fig. 1 presents a schematic cross-sectional view of a CMUT unit fabricated using a sacrificial release process. The silicon nitride vibration film is situated above the vacuum cavity, while below the vacuum cavity are the aluminum (Al) electrode layer, the silicon dioxide (SiO2) sacrificial layer, and the silicon (Si) substrate layer.

Fig. 1.  (Color online) Schematic of a CMUT fabricated using a sacrificial release process.

Fig. 2 shows the equivalent receiving circuit model for a CMUT sensing cell, which includes a voltage-mode amplification circuit. The equivalent circuit model includes the acoustic, mechanical, and electrical domains. In the acoustic domain, Pout is the output pressure, Vv is the volume velocity, Za is the acoustic impedance. The Za comprising of a damping load Ra and a mass load ma is described as the medium resistance and inductance. In the mechanical domain, Fe is the electrostatic force, Vp is the velocity at the center, mm and km are derived to represent the effective stiffness and the effective mass of the sensing cell for a particular vibration mode, respectively. In the electrical domain, Vac is the input voltage, ie is the current, C0 is the active capacitance corresponding to the electromechanical transformer, Cp is the parasitic capacitance, C0 is the so-called electrostatic spring softening effect. Aeff is effective area, which is usually equal to 1/3 the surface area of the sensing diaphragm. n is the electromechanical transformer ratio, which represents the energy conversion efficiency.

Fig. 2.  Equivalent receiving circuit model for a sensing cell of the CMUT array, which includes a voltage-mode amplification circuit.

The electrostatic force in the mechanical domain Fe can be expressed as:

Fe=ε0AV22(d0x)2, (1)

where ε0 is permittivity of free space. V is applied DC voltage. x is diaphragm displacement. d0 is initial gap height.

The transformer ratio n can derived as:

n=Vε0A(deffx)2. (2)

Generally, a transducer's sensitivity is governed by the transformer ratio, inversely correlated with the square of the cavity depth. CMUT offers the potential for high transformation ratios due to surface micromachining capabilities, enabling the fabrication of relatively narrow gaps, sometimes as small as 50 nm, which enhances its performance.

In the equilibrium position, the electrical force is counterbalanced by the restoring force, with the mechanical force exerted by the membrane being dependent on the spring constant k.

Fmech=kx. (3)

By equating the relevant equations, the relationship between membrane displacement and the applied DC voltage can be determined.

V=2kxAε0(d0x). (4)

The displacement at the point of collapse can be identified by setting dV/dx to zero, indicating the collapse occurs at that specific displacement.

x=d03. (5)

The pull-in collapse voltage is

Vcoll=8kd3027ε0A, (6)
deff=dmεr+d0. (7)

Here dm is the diaphragm thickness. εr is the relative dielectric constant of the diaphragm material.

Furthermore, the capacitance of the diaphragm can be determined using the following expression:

Cx=Aε0deffx. (8)

The maximum receiving sensitivity V/μPa of the CMUT array denoted as SR is defined as follows:

SR=nAeffRm. (9)

Consequently, achieving high sensitivity values comparable to those of piezoelectric transducers is feasible. The maximum receive sensitivity SR is influenced not only by the transformer ratio but also by the medium damping, which is dictated by the target application. Therefore, enhancing the transformer ratio remains the only viable method to improve receive sensitivity.

The current generated by the CMUT can be expressed as:

i2=(VDCC0g)2wH04kTw0/(mQ)(ww2/w)2+(w0/Q)2dw, (10)

where w0 is the resonant frequency, k is Boltzmann's constant, Q is the quality factor, T is the absolute temperature, VDC is the applied DC bias voltage, g is the gap between plates and C0 is the capacitance between the plates.

Table 1 shows the material properties used in the simulations. The detailed design parameters of CMUTs array are shown in Table 2. The CMUT array are fabricated using a silicon nitride sacrificial release process in this work. The cross-sectional overview of each main step of the fabrication process is illustrated in Fig. 3. The process starts with a silicon wafer substrate covered with a 1 μm thick oxide, and a 0.4 μm thick aluminum layer is deposited and patterned to form the electrode connection layer (Fig. 3(a)). Following 1 μm thick oxide deposition, a 0.4 μm thick Al layer is deposited and patterned to form the bottom electrodes (Fig. 3(b)). Then, another 0.05 μm oxide is deposited as the sacrificial layer and is patterned to define the cavity. Over the patterned oxide sacrificial layer, 1 μm silicon nitride is deposited as the device membrane (Fig. 3(c)). Next, contact holes are opened to access the electrode connection layer for electrical connection (Fig. 3(d)). A 1.0 μm thick Al layer is deposited and patterned to form the top electrode (Fig. 3(e)). The oxide sacrificial layer are etched to form the cavity (Fig. 3(f)). A 1.8 μm thick silicon nitride passivation layer deposition to form device diaphragm (Fig. 3(g)). Finally, holes are opened to access the electrode connection layer for electrical connections (Fig. 3(h)).

Fig. 3.  (Color online) Process flow of fabricating CMUT array using the sacrificial release method. (a) Substrate with oxide and patterning electrode connection layer. (b) Bottom electrode deposition and patterning. (c) Defining device cavity. (d) Contact hole opening to access the electrode connection layer. (e) Top electrode deposition and patterning. (f) Cavity etch. (g) Silicon nitride to form device diaphragm. (h) Contact holes opening to access the electrode connection layer.
Table 1.  Material properties used in the simulations.
Property Si₃N₄ SiO₂
Young's modulus (GPa) 110 73
Poisson's ratio 0.27 0.17
Dielectric permittivity 5.4 3.7
Density (kg/m³) 3100 2329
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table
Table 2.  Detailed design parameters of CMUTs array.
Parameter Value
Array length (mm) 1.5
Array width (mm) 1.5
Diaphragm length (μm) 48
Diaphragm width (μm) 27
Electrode thickness (nm) 400
Vacuum gap height (nm) 50
Number of cells per array 1375
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

The optical microscope image of the CMUT array and the SEM image of its sensing cell are shown in Fig. 4. The size of the CMUT array is 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm and the sensing cells are arranged in a multi-ring nested manner. The CMUT array integrates driving electrodes and detection electrodes, as shown in the Fig. 4. This innovative design helps to realize the miniaturization of the imaging system. Fig. 5 showed the optical microscope image of the CMUT wafer.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) Optical images of a fabricated CMUT array with a magnified image of one sensing cell. The CMUT array size is 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm.
Fig. 5.  (Color online) The CMUT wafers.

An industrial standard piezoelectric transducer is used as a reference to measure the receiving sensitivity of our CMUT array. As shown in Fig. 6, the CMUT array exhibits a maximum response frequency at 1.06 MHz, with a receiving sensitivity of −231.44 dB (re: 1 V/μPa) at room temperature. This high sensitivity, combined with the optimal operating frequency, makes the CMUT array an ideal choice for underwater imaging applications. The CMUT array's superior performance ensures precise and reliable detection of acoustic signals, which is critical for high-resolution underwater imaging.

Fig. 6.  (Color online) The measured receiving sensitivity under different frequencies for the CMUT array.

The temperature stability of the receiving sensitivity of the CMUT array is investigated. The ceramic heater and the packaged CMUT array were placed in a small experimental water tank, and the real-time temperature in the water tank was measured with a commercial thermocouple thermometer (Tronovo-TR6602). During the test process, the change of the receiving sensitivity of CMUT array with temperature in the range of 0−60 °C was recorded, and the result shows that the measured receiving sensitivity variation of the CMUT array is 0.87 dB, as shown in Fig. 7. The small variation of the sensitivity with temperature validates its good stability in working state, which also means high reliability in the applications of medical imaging equipment.

Fig. 7.  (Color online) Measured acoustic pressure sensitivity of the CMUT array in the temperature range from 0 to 60 °C.

The relationship between the measured output voltage and the incident acoustic pressure is shown in Fig. 8. The acoustic pressure is increased from 0 to 200 kPa when CMUT array works at 1 kHz, and the maximum non-linearity is about 0.44% by linear fitting calculation. The non-linearity of the CMUT array is obviously better than other reported products in the same frequency range.

Fig. 8.  (Color online) Non-linearity measurement obtained by sweeping the acoustic pressure up to 200 kPa at 1 kHz, which shows the maximum non-linearity to be about 0.44%.

This paper presents the design, fabrication, packaging, and characterization of a high-performance transceiver Integrated CMUT array. The transceiver Integrated CMUT array is through drive electrode and detection electrode to separate the ultrasound transmission and reception process instead of switch circuit. The designed CMUT array achieves a receiving sensitivity of −231.44 dB (re: 1 V/μPa) at a resonance frequency, the measured receiving sensitivity variation of the CMUT array is 0.87 dB at the range of 0−60 °C, and the maximum nonlinearity of output voltage at 1 kHz is about 0.44%. The reported high-performance CMUT array shows great commercial value to portable underwater imaging devices.

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61927807, 62320106011, and 62304208, in part by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant 2023M733277 and 2024T170848.



[1]
Jia L, He C, Xue C, et al. The device characteristics and fabrication method of 72-element CMUT array for long-range underwater imaging applications. Microsyst Technol, 2019, 25, 1195 doi: 10.1007/s00542-018-4062-4
[2]
Stojanovic M, and Preisig J. Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization. IEEE Commun Mag, 2009, 47, 84 doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2009.4752682
[3]
Herrera B, Pop F, Cassella C, et al. Miniaturized PMUT-based receiver for underwater acoustic networking. J Microelectromech S, 2020, 29, 832 doi: 10.1109/JMEMS.2020.3018070
[4]
Almeida R, Cruz N, and Matos A. Synchronized intelligent buoy network for underwater positioning. In Proceedings of the OMAE2010 29th International Conference on Ocean, 2010, 1 doi: 10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5663995
[5]
Francois D, Royer J, Perrot J. Long-term autonomous hydrophones for large-scale hydroacoustic monitoring of the oceans. In Proceedings of the 2012OCEANS, Yeosu, 2012, 1 doi: 10.1109/OCEANS-Yeosu.2012.6263519
[6]
Przybyla R, Flynn A, Jain V, et al. A micromechanical ultrasonic distance sensor with > 1 meter range. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, 2011, 2070 doi: 10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2011.5969226
[7]
Benthowave Instrument Inc, Product Datasheet. [Online]. Available: https://www.benthowave.com/products/BII-7150Hydrophone.html
[8]
DolphinEar Hydrophones, Product Datasheet. [Online]. Available: http://www.dolphinear.com/de200.html
[9]
H2a Hydrophone User's Guide, Aquarian Audio, Anacortes, WA, USA
[10]
Brüel & Kjser. Hydrophones-Types 8103, 8104, 8105 and 8106. Sep, 2017
[11]
Liao W, Ren T, Yang Y, et al. Novel device design for an ultrasonic ranging system. Integr Ferroelectr, 2009, 105, 53 doi: 10.1080/10584580903039257
[12]
Jia L, Shi L, Liu C, et al. Design and characterization of an aluminum nitride-based MEMS hydrophone with biologically honeycomb architecture. IEEE T Electron Dev, 2021, 68, 4656 doi: 10.1109/TED.2021.3093020
[13]
Jia L, Shi L, Lu Z, et al. A high-performance 9.5% scandium-doped aluminum nitride piezoelectric MEMS hydrophone with honeycomb structure. IEEE Electr Device L, 2021, 42, 1845 doi: 10.1109/LED.2021.3120806
[14]
Yaralioglu G, Ergun A, Bayram B, et al. Calculation and measurement of electromechanical coupling coefficient of capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr, 2003, 50, 449 doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2003.1197968
[15]
Khuri-Yakub B, Oralkan Ö. Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers for medical imaging and therapy. J Micromech Microeng, 2011, 21, 054004 doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/21/5/054004
Fig. 1.  (Color online) Schematic of a CMUT fabricated using a sacrificial release process.

Fig. 2.  Equivalent receiving circuit model for a sensing cell of the CMUT array, which includes a voltage-mode amplification circuit.

Fig. 3.  (Color online) Process flow of fabricating CMUT array using the sacrificial release method. (a) Substrate with oxide and patterning electrode connection layer. (b) Bottom electrode deposition and patterning. (c) Defining device cavity. (d) Contact hole opening to access the electrode connection layer. (e) Top electrode deposition and patterning. (f) Cavity etch. (g) Silicon nitride to form device diaphragm. (h) Contact holes opening to access the electrode connection layer.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) Optical images of a fabricated CMUT array with a magnified image of one sensing cell. The CMUT array size is 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm.

Fig. 5.  (Color online) The CMUT wafers.

Fig. 6.  (Color online) The measured receiving sensitivity under different frequencies for the CMUT array.

Fig. 7.  (Color online) Measured acoustic pressure sensitivity of the CMUT array in the temperature range from 0 to 60 °C.

Fig. 8.  (Color online) Non-linearity measurement obtained by sweeping the acoustic pressure up to 200 kPa at 1 kHz, which shows the maximum non-linearity to be about 0.44%.

Table 1.   Material properties used in the simulations.

Property Si₃N₄ SiO₂
Young's modulus (GPa) 110 73
Poisson's ratio 0.27 0.17
Dielectric permittivity 5.4 3.7
Density (kg/m³) 3100 2329
DownLoad: CSV

Table 2.   Detailed design parameters of CMUTs array.

Parameter Value
Array length (mm) 1.5
Array width (mm) 1.5
Diaphragm length (μm) 48
Diaphragm width (μm) 27
Electrode thickness (nm) 400
Vacuum gap height (nm) 50
Number of cells per array 1375
DownLoad: CSV
[1]
Jia L, He C, Xue C, et al. The device characteristics and fabrication method of 72-element CMUT array for long-range underwater imaging applications. Microsyst Technol, 2019, 25, 1195 doi: 10.1007/s00542-018-4062-4
[2]
Stojanovic M, and Preisig J. Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization. IEEE Commun Mag, 2009, 47, 84 doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2009.4752682
[3]
Herrera B, Pop F, Cassella C, et al. Miniaturized PMUT-based receiver for underwater acoustic networking. J Microelectromech S, 2020, 29, 832 doi: 10.1109/JMEMS.2020.3018070
[4]
Almeida R, Cruz N, and Matos A. Synchronized intelligent buoy network for underwater positioning. In Proceedings of the OMAE2010 29th International Conference on Ocean, 2010, 1 doi: 10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5663995
[5]
Francois D, Royer J, Perrot J. Long-term autonomous hydrophones for large-scale hydroacoustic monitoring of the oceans. In Proceedings of the 2012OCEANS, Yeosu, 2012, 1 doi: 10.1109/OCEANS-Yeosu.2012.6263519
[6]
Przybyla R, Flynn A, Jain V, et al. A micromechanical ultrasonic distance sensor with > 1 meter range. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, 2011, 2070 doi: 10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2011.5969226
[7]
Benthowave Instrument Inc, Product Datasheet. [Online]. Available: https://www.benthowave.com/products/BII-7150Hydrophone.html
[8]
DolphinEar Hydrophones, Product Datasheet. [Online]. Available: http://www.dolphinear.com/de200.html
[9]
H2a Hydrophone User's Guide, Aquarian Audio, Anacortes, WA, USA
[10]
Brüel & Kjser. Hydrophones-Types 8103, 8104, 8105 and 8106. Sep, 2017
[11]
Liao W, Ren T, Yang Y, et al. Novel device design for an ultrasonic ranging system. Integr Ferroelectr, 2009, 105, 53 doi: 10.1080/10584580903039257
[12]
Jia L, Shi L, Liu C, et al. Design and characterization of an aluminum nitride-based MEMS hydrophone with biologically honeycomb architecture. IEEE T Electron Dev, 2021, 68, 4656 doi: 10.1109/TED.2021.3093020
[13]
Jia L, Shi L, Lu Z, et al. A high-performance 9.5% scandium-doped aluminum nitride piezoelectric MEMS hydrophone with honeycomb structure. IEEE Electr Device L, 2021, 42, 1845 doi: 10.1109/LED.2021.3120806
[14]
Yaralioglu G, Ergun A, Bayram B, et al. Calculation and measurement of electromechanical coupling coefficient of capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr, 2003, 50, 449 doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2003.1197968
[15]
Khuri-Yakub B, Oralkan Ö. Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers for medical imaging and therapy. J Micromech Microeng, 2011, 21, 054004 doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/21/5/054004
1

Sensitivity enhancement of OD- and OD-CNT-based humidity sensors by high gravity thin film deposition technique

Kh. S. Karimov, Noshin Fatima, Khaulah Sulaiman, M. Mahroof Tahir, Zubair Ahmad, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(3): 034005. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/3/034005

2

In situ TEM/SEM electronic/mechanical characterization of nano material with MEMS chip

Yuelin Wang, Tie Li, Xiao Zhang, Hongjiang Zeng, Qinhua Jin, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(8): 081001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/8/081001

3

Optical and electrical properties of electrochemically deposited polyaniline-CeO2 hybrid nanocomposite film

Anees A. Ansari, M. A. M. Khan, M. Naziruddin Khan, Salman A. Alrokayan, M. Alhoshan, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(4): 043001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/4/043001

4

MOS Capacitance-Voltage Characteristics II. Sensitivity of Electronic Trapping at Dopant Impurity from Parameter Variations

Jie Binbin, Sah Chihtang

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(12): 121001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/12/121001

5

Influence of voltage on photo-electrochemical etching of n-type macroporous silicon arrays

Wang Guozheng, Fu Shencheng, Chen Li, Wang Ji, Qin Xulei, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(11): 116002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/11/116002

6

Design of an analog front-end for ambulatory biopotential measurement systems

Wang Jiazhen, Xu Jun, Zheng Lirong, Ren Junyan

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(10): 105004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/10/105004

7

Effect of collector bias current on the linearity of common-emitter BJT amplifiers

Li Kun, Teng Jianfu, Xuan Xiuwei

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(12): 124012. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/12/124012

8

High linearity 5.2-GHz power amplifier MMIC using CPW structure technology with a linearizer circuit

Wu Chia-Song, Lin Tah-Yeong, Wu Hsien-Ming

Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31(2): 025002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/2/025002

9

A cross-coupled-structure-based temperature sensor with reduced process variation sensitivity

Tie Meng, Cheng Xu

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(4): 045002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/4/045002

10

Synthesis of organic semiconductor hexadecachloro zinc phthalocyanine and its gas sensitivity

Shi Yunbo, Lei Tingping, Li Zan, Xiu Debin, Zhao Wenjie, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(3): 034009. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/3/034009

11

Performance analysis of solar cell arrays in concentrating light intensity

Xu Yongfeng, Li Ming, Wang Liuling, Lin Wenxian, Xiang Ming, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 084011. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/084011

12

VLSI architecture of a K-best detector for MIMO–OFDM wireless communication systems

Jian Haifang, Shi Yin

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(7): 075004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/7/075004

13

Design and Mechanical Characteristics of Novel MEMS Microneedles

Sun Xiao, Jia Shuhai, Zhu Jun, Li Yigui

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(1): 113-116.

14

Silicon Nanowires Fabricated by MEMS Technology and Their Electronic Performance

Liu Wenping, Li Tie, Yang Heng, Jiao Jiwei, Li Xinxin, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(9): 1645-1649.

15

Wet Etching and Releasing of MEMS

Ou Yi, Shi Shali, Li Chaobo, Jiao Binbin, Chen Dapeng, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(S1): 347-350.

16

Influence of Interconnection Configuration on Thermal Dissipation of ULSI Interconnect Systems

Xiao Xia, Yao Suying, Ruan Gang

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(3): 516-523.

17

A Wide-Band High-Linearity Down-Conversion Mixer for Cable Receptions

Gu Ming, Shi Yin, Dai F F

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(7): 1159-1163.

18

Pressure Effect on Electronic Mobility in Quasi-Two-Dimensional AlxGa1-xAs/GaAs Heterojunction Systems

Bai Xianping, Ban Shiliang

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(12): 2422-2427.

19

Sensitivity of Total-Dose Radiation Hardness of SIMOX Buried Oxides to Doses of Nitrogen Implantation into Buried Oxides

Zheng Zhongshan, Liu Zhongli, Zhang Guoqiang, Li Ning, Li Guohua, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(5): 862-866.

20

High-Integrated-Photosensitivity Negative-Electron-Affinity GaAs Photocathodes with Multilayer Be-Doping Structures

Wang Xiaofeng, Zeng Yiping, Wang Baoqiang, Zhu Zhanping, Du Xiaoqing, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(9): 1692-1698.

1. Liu, G., Wang, R., Liu, H. et al. Design and Implementation of a Three-Dimensional Vector Hydrophone with Half-Wheatstone Bridge. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2025. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2025.3551445
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Licheng Jia, Rihui Xue, Fansheng Meng. Design and characterization of a multi-ring nested CMUT array for hydrophone[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2024, 45(11): 112301. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24060007
    L C Jia, R H Xue, and F S Meng, Design and characterization of a multi-ring nested CMUT array for hydrophone[J]. J. Semicond., 2024, 45(11), 112301 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24060007
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 486 Times PDF downloads: 43 Times Cited by: 1 Times

    History

    Received: 05 June 2024 Revised: 16 July 2024 Online: Accepted Manuscript: 03 September 2024Uncorrected proof: 04 September 2024Published: 15 November 2024

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Licheng Jia, Rihui Xue, Fansheng Meng. Design and characterization of a multi-ring nested CMUT array for hydrophone[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2024, 45(11): 112301. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24060007 ****L C Jia, R H Xue, and F S Meng, Design and characterization of a multi-ring nested CMUT array for hydrophone[J]. J. Semicond., 2024, 45(11), 112301 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24060007
      Citation:
      Licheng Jia, Rihui Xue, Fansheng Meng. Design and characterization of a multi-ring nested CMUT array for hydrophone[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2024, 45(11): 112301. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24060007 ****
      L C Jia, R H Xue, and F S Meng, Design and characterization of a multi-ring nested CMUT array for hydrophone[J]. J. Semicond., 2024, 45(11), 112301 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/24060007

      Design and characterization of a multi-ring nested CMUT array for hydrophone

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/24060007
      More Information
      • Licheng Jia received the Ph.D. degree in microelectronics and solid-state electronics in Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, in 2022. Presently, he is a lecturer at State Key Laboratory of Dynamic Measurement Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan, China. His research work is focusing on microfabrication, underwater MEMS and Bio-MEMS applications
      • Corresponding author: jialicheng@nuc.edu.cn
      • Received Date: 2024-06-05
      • Revised Date: 2024-07-16
      • Available Online: 2024-09-03

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return