Processing math: 100%
J. Semicond. > 2022, Volume 43 > Issue 8 > 082802

ARTICLES

Influence of epitaxial layer structure and cell structure on electrical performance of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET

Lixin Tian1, , Zechen Du1, Rui Liu1, Xiping Niu1, Wenting Zhang1, Yunlai An1, Zhanwei Shen2, Fei Yang1, and Xiaoguang Wei1

+ Author Affiliations

 Corresponding author: Lixin Tian, tianlixin0526@163.com; Fei Yang, yangsenji@163.com

DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/8/082802

PDF

Turn off MathJax

Abstract: Silicon carbide (SiC) material features a wide bandgap and high critical breakdown field intensity. It also plays an important role in the high efficiency and miniaturization of power electronic equipment. It is an ideal choice for new power electronic devices, especially in smart grids and high-speed trains. In the medium and high voltage fields, SiC devices with a blocking voltage of more than 6.5 kV will have a wide range of applications. In this paper, we study the influence of epitaxial material properties on the static characteristics of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET. 6.5 kV SiC MOSFETs with different channel lengths and JFET region widths are manufactured on three wafers and analyzed. The FN tunneling of gate oxide, HTGB and HTRB tests are performed and provide data support for the industrialization process for medium/high voltage SiC MOSFETs.

Key words: silicon carbideepitaxial layerchannel lengthJFET region widthFN tunnelingHTGB

Silicon carbide (SiC) is a typical representative of the wide bandgap of semiconductors, due to its bandgap, strong critical breakdown field and high thermal conductivity. SiC materials and devices have been included in the National 14th Five-Year Plan for Science and Technology[1, 2]. In the past two decades, SiC power devices have been widely used in low-voltage applications. Companies such as CREE[3], Rohm[4], and Infineon[5] have dominated the market. In high-voltage applications, SiC devices have been used in high-speed motor drives, solid-state transformers, railway traction and fast chargers for electric vehicles[6-8]. In traditional silicon-based power converters, high-voltage silicon IGBTs are usually connected in parallel and in series to meet the needs of high voltage and high current. However, series and parallel connections will introduce voltage imbalance and current imbalance, respectively.

High voltage devices play a significant role in improving device performance and equipment reliability[9]. Silicon carbide metal–oxide–semiconductor field effect transistors (SiC MOSFETs) have the advantages of high voltage, low loss, high temperature operation, and so on[10]. They are also highly efficient and miniaturized for power electronic equipment. In addition, they play an important role and are an ideal choice for new power electronic devices [11].

In this paper, the influence of epitaxial properties on the static properties of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFETs is studied. Five types of SiC MOSFETs with different channel lengths and JFET region widths are developed on three wafers and analyzed in detail. Finally, the gate oxide characteristics of the device were analyzed.

The slope of the electric field in the drift region is determined by the doping concentration of the drift region, which can be obtained according to the Poisson equation:

dExdx=d2ψdx2=qNdεs.
(1)

In the formula: Nd is the doping concentration of the drift region, and εs is the dielectric constant of SiC.

From formula (1), the device blocking voltage VR can be related to the breakdown critical electric field Em of the drift region as follows:

VR=(EmqNdw2εs)w.
(2)

Therefore, only by deriving the relationship between Em and the doping concentration Nd of the drift region and the thickness w of the drift region can the relationship between the blocking voltage VR and the parameters of the drift layer be obtained. From Ref. [12], the relationship between the breakdown critical electric field and the doping concentration of the drift region is as follows:

Em=2.49×106114lg(Nd/1016).
(3)

From Eqs. (2) and (3), the relationship between the device breakdown voltage VR and the doping concentration Nd under different drift layer widths w can be obtained. The greater the thickness, the greater the blocking voltage that the epitaxial layer can bear; and the greater the doping, the smaller the blocking voltage that the epitaxial layer can bear.

Considering the specific on-resistance Rsp of the epitaxial layer as:

Rsp=wqμnNd.
(4)

There is a trade-off relationship between the specific on-resistance and the blocking voltage of the epitaxial layer. It is necessary to combine formula calculation and TCAD simulation to determine the thickness and concentration of the epitaxial layer. In this paper, Sentaurus TCAD is used to simulate the characteristics of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET.

Fig. 1 shows the current density and blocking voltage variation with doping concentration and thickness of epitaxial layer. To achieve a blocking voltage of 6.5 kV, it is determined that the blocking voltage of the epitaxial layer is 8.125 kV, leaving a margin of 25%. The thickness of the epitaxial layer is between 60 to 64 μm, and the blocking voltage per micron is about 120 V. Epitaxial doping concentration is about (1.1−1.3) × 1015 cm−3. Epitaxial wafer thickness and concentration have inter- and intra-chip inhomogeneities. For high-voltage devices, the epitaxial layer contributes most of the resistance and the blocking voltage, so the intra- and inter-wafer uniformity of epitaxial wafer thickness and concentration has a greater impact on the characteristics of the device.

Fig. 1.  (Color online) Current density and blocking voltage variation with doping concentration and thickness of epitaxial layer.

In this paper, the 6.5 kV SiC MOSFETs were fabricated on a (0001) Si-faced, 4° off-axis toward the <11ˉ20> direction, and N-type 4H-SiC substrate. The nominal voltage was 6.5 kV, and the epitaxial layer ranged from 60 to 65 μm thick with an N-type doping concentration of approximately 1.2 × 1015 cm−3. Due to the intra- and inter-wafer uniformity of epitaxial wafer thickness and concentration, the thickness and concentration has a large range. Fig. 2 shows a schematic diagram of the structure of a 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) Schematic cross-section of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET.

Al was used as the P-type dopant and N was the N-type dopant. Multiple energy implants of Al and N were implanted to form the P well, P+ body, N+ source and JFET. After all of the ion implantations were made, activation anneal was carried out at 1600–1750 °C for 30 min with carbon cap to maximize lattice recovery and dopant activation. Then, a sacrificial oxidation of 20 nm was conducted to get rid of the surface roughness caused by ion implantation. After that, a 50 nm gate oxide was formed by thermal oxidation followed by NO annealing. Phosphorus-doped polysilicon of 500 nm was then deposited over the gate oxide, followed by gate patterning. 700 nm of inter-layer dielectric was then deposited and patterned to form the ohmic contact window. 150 nm Ni was deposited on the front and backsides of the wafer and rapid thermal annealing (RTP) was carried out at 1000 °C for 2 min to form the ohmic contacts. The interlayer dielectric on the poly-Si was patterned to expose the gate poly-Si pad to form a gate bus. The top metal stack (Ti/Al) was then deposited and patterned to form the source and gate pads. Then, the passivation layer polyimide was deposited and patterned. Lastly, the metal stack (Ti/Ag) was deposition on the backside. The design structure of a floating guard ring edge termination was used for the 6.5 kV conventional planar-gate power MOSFETs. Fig. 3 shows a wafer photo of a 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET. In this article, we use three epitaxial wafers to develop MOSFETs. The parameters of the epitaxial wafers are shown in Table 1. The specific on-resistances contributed by the three types of epitaxial layers are 34.1, 36.5 and 34.8 mΩ·cm2.

Table 1.  Epitaxial layer thickness and doping concentration.
NumberThickness (μm)Doping (1015 cm−3)t/(Ndqμ)
#164.71.2934.1
#262.31.1636.5
#362.51.2234.8
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table
Fig. 3.  (Color online) 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET devices on the 6-inch wafer.

In this paper, five kinds of chips with different channel lengths LC and JFET region widths WJ were designed on the wafer. The cell structure parameters are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.  Cell parameter table.
Cell numberChannel length (μm)Width of JFET region (μm)
C10.754
C21.254
C314
C413
C515
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

As shown in Fig. 4, the output characteristics of 5 cell structures in 3 epitaxial wafers are compared. The gate–source voltage is 20 V, and the drain-source voltage is 4 V. It can be seen from Fig. 4 that the average current of #1 wafer is the largest, the average current of #3 wafer is second, and the average current of #2 wafer is the smallest. The wafer output current has the same law in the five types of cells. The active area of the five chips is the same, which is 4.7 mm2. Due to the different chip pitches, the edges and corners of the active area of the chip are different, there will be a slight difference in the total cell area but the overall can be ignored. The specific on-resistance of C1 device on the wafer #1 is 44 mΩ·cm2. The resistance of SiC MOSFET consists of substrate resistance, drift region resistance, JFET resistance, accumulation region resistance, channel resistance, source region resistance and ohmic contact resistance. In the case of the same cell structure, the epitaxial layer parameters (i.e., the doping concentration and thickness of the epitaxial wafer) are important factors affecting the conduction characteristics. The greater the thickness w of the epitaxial wafer, the greater the resistance; and the smaller the doping concentration Nd, the higher the resistance. The specific on-resistance contributed by the epitaxial layer is t/(Nd), where μ is the SiC bulk mobility.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) Comparison of output current of five chips on three wafers.

The current difference between #1 wafer and #2 wafer is 0.3 A. According to the IDVDS characteristics of the chip and the chip area, the specific on-resistance difference of #1 wafer and #2 wafer is 0.38 mΩ·cm2 which is similar to epitaxial wafer specific on-resistance difference. For the C4 device, when the JFET width is 3 μm, the proportion of JFET resistance increases, and the effect of epitaxial wafer differences on device conduction is weakened. So the output currents of #2 and #3 are basically the same.

The current distribution uniformity of the #3 wafer is the best, and #2 wafer is the worst, which is largely due to epitaxial layer thickness and doping concentration inhomogeneity. Therefore, the quality of the epitaxial wafer affects the uniformity of the electrical properties of the chip.

In this paper, the output curves and transfer curves of the devices with five cell parameters are compared at VGS = 20 V, which are shown in Fig. 5. The threshold voltage is determined at the drain-source current of 5 mA by sweeping the gate–source voltage with drain electrodes biased of 10 V. With the increasing channel length, the threshold voltage VGS(th) of the device increases. The on-resistance increases, leading to the drop of the output characteristic curve, and so does the transconductance gfs. With the increasing width of the JFET region, the threshold voltage increases, but the on-resistance decreases. The output characteristic curve moves up, and the three transfer curves cross during the gate voltage increase. When the JFET width is 3 μm, the output curve deviates from the linear region earlier. When Vds is kept constant, the main resistance of the device at low gate voltage comes from channel. The larger the JFET width is, the smaller the cell density and the channel density are. Therefore, at low gate voltage, the device resistance increases with the increase of JFET width. To achieve the same current, such as 5 mA, more gate voltage needs to be applied. Therefore, for the same active area, the wider JFET, the greater the threshold voltage. The change of threshold voltage with channel length is the same as the change of threshold voltage with JFET width.

Fig. 5.  (Color online) Comparison of output, transfer and derivative parameters of five cell structures. (a) Output characteristic curves. (b) Transfer characteristic curves. (c) Transconductance comparison of different channel lengths. (d) Cell transconductance comparison of different JFET widths.

This article counts the yield of the chips on each wafer. The overall chip area on the wafer is relatively small, so the gate–source yield and blocking yield of the chip are basically the same. We also make a batch of 6.5 kV large-area chips, with the active area of 37 mm2. The gate–source yield and blocking yield are independent of each other[13]. The yield of 6.5 kV MOSFET in this paper is shown in Table 3. The average yields are 40%, 55% and 50%, for the three wafers, respectively. The yield of high-voltage devices decreases rapidly with the increase of defect density and chip area. Reducing the defects in epitaxial materials and those introduced in processes is an important approach to realize commercialization of high-voltage SiC MOSFET devices.

Table 3.  Chip yield of 3 wafers.
#1#2#3
C136.36%54.55%61.90%
C236.36%54.55%57.14%
C340.91%54.55%38.10%
C431.82%50.00%42.86%
C554.55%63.64%52.38%
DownLoad: CSV  | Show Table

FN tunneling is also called triangular breakdown[14-16]. When the electric field is high enough, the gate oxygen energy level bends to form a triangular shape. When the width of the triangular region is small, electrons directly tunnel. The field strength during FN tunneling is an important parameter for evaluating the quality of the gate oxide. During the preparation of the MOSFET device, the breakdown characteristics of the gate oxide can be tested through the patterned gate oxide capacitor. The I–V curves of gate oxide capacitor are shown in Fig. 6. When Vg is around 35 V, the leakage current of the curve begins to increase rapidly. Therefore, the FN tunneling of this device occurs at an approximate value of 7 MV/cm.

Fig. 6.  (Color online) Breakdown characteristics of test pattern gate oxide capacitors.

The potential barrier height between the gate oxide and SiC is obtained by transforming the I–V curve[14]. The transforming curves of the gate oxide capacitor I–V curves are shown in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.  (Color online) The transforming curves of the gate oxide capacitor I–V curves.
JFN=AE2exp(BE),
(5)
ln(JE2)=lnABE,
(6)
A=q3m8πhmoxφb,B=8π2moxφb3/23hq,
(7)

where mox is the mass of electrons in the oxide layer, mox = 0.42m = 3.826 × 10–31 kg, h is Planck’s constant, h = 6.626 × 10–34 J·s.

According to the slopes of the transforming curves, the potential barrier height φb is:

φb=(B4.43×107)23eV.
(8)

Fig. 8 shows the relationship between barrier height φb and the slope. In our data, the range of slope B is (1.987−2.125) × 10−8, and the range of φb is 2.75−2.85 eV. It represents a high barrier height between gate oxide and SiC.

Fig. 8.  (Color online) The relationship between barrier height and slope.

We prepared several 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET modules. Fig. 9 shows 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET package layout and outline. The long-term reliability of the gate oxide were evaluated through high-temperature gate bias tests (HTGB).

Fig. 9.  (Color online) 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET package layout and outline.

Under two conditions of gate–source bias VGS = –8 V and VGS = 20 V, respectively, the HTGB reliability tests were performed for 650 h at the temperature of 150 °C. Fig. 10 shows the results of high temperature gate bias reliability test for forward gate voltage test and reverse gate voltage test. The gate leakage current is below 5 nA. After the reliability test, there is no degradation of static characteristics for 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET.

Fig. 10.  High temperature gate bias reliability. (a) Forward gate voltage test results. (b) Reverse gate voltage test results.

The high temperature reverse bias reliability is carried out at 150 °C. The gate and source is short-circuited and grounded. The VDS is set to 5.15 kV, and the leakage is tested every two minutes. Fig. 11 shows the leakage results of the HTRB reliability with a total of 560 h. After the HTRB reliability test is completed, the device is retested again. The retest results prove that the device is intact.

Fig. 11.  The results of high temperature reverse bias reliability.

The structure of the high-voltage 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET device is optimized and developed through process optimization. Based on the electrical characteristics of the device with different epitaxial structures and cell parameters, the following conclusions are drawn:

The specific on-resistance of C1 device on the wafer #1 is 44 mΩ·cm2. The uniformity of the current distribution is large due to inhomogeneity of the epitaxial layer thickness and doping concentration. Therefore, the quality of the epitaxial wafer affects the uniformity of the electrical properties of the chip.

With the decreasing channel length, the threshold voltage VGS(th) of the device decreases and the transconductance increases. As the width of the JFET region increases, the threshold voltage increases and the transconductance first increases and then decreases.

The FN tunneling of the device is about 7 MV/cm, and the barrier height φb ranges from 2.75 to 2.85 eV.

The HTGB tests for 650 h respectively indicate that the gate oxide has good reliability. The 560 h HTRB also passed.

These results show that the design, fabrication and analysis of the device characteristics of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET will provide important guiding and significant promotion value for its penetration into the power grid field.

The authors thank the support of the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2016YFB0400500) and the Science & Technology Program of the State Grid Corporation of China Co., Ltd. “High voltage and high power SiC materials, devices and the application demonstration in power electronic transformers”.



[1]
Sun B X, Xie R B, Yu C, et al. Structural characterization of SiC nanoparticles. J Semicond, 2017, 38, 103002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/10/103002
[2]
Zeng C, Deng L F, Li Z J, et al. Experimental comparison of SiC GTO and ETO for pulse power applications. J Semicond, 2018, 39, 124017 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/12/124017
[3]
Wolfspeed company C4D40120D datasheet [EB/OL] (2019-6-17) [2020-3-2]. https://www.wolfspeed.com/power/products/sic-schottky-diodes
[4]
Rohm company SCT2450KEHR datasheet [EB/OL] (2019-2-22). https://www.rohm.com.cn/products/sic-power-devices/sic-mosfet
[5]
Infineon company AIMW120R035M1H datasheet [EB/OL] (2019-2-22). https://www.infineon.com/cms/cn/product/power/mosfet/silicon-carbide/discretes/aimw120r035m1h
[6]
Mainali K, Wang R X, Sabate J, et al. Current sharing and overvoltage issues of paralleled SiC MOSFET modules. 2019 IEEE Energy Convers Congr Expo ECCE, 2019, 2413 doi: 10.1109/ECCE.2019.8912526
[7]
Chen J J, Jiang X, Li Z J, et al. Investigation on effects of thermal stress on SiC MOSFET degradation through power cycling tests. 2020 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2020, 1106 doi: 10.1109/APEC39645.2020.9124249
[8]
Bencherif H, Yousfi A, Dehimi L, et al. Analysis of Al2O3 high-k gate dielectric effect on the electrical characteristics of a 4H-SiC low-power MOSFET. 2019 1st International Conference on Sustainable Renewable Energy Systems and Applications, 2019, 1 doi: 10.1109/ICSRESA49121.2019.9182412
[9]
Wirths S, Mihaila A, Romano G, et al. Study of 1.2kV high-k SiC power MOSFETS under harsh repetitive switching conditions. 2021 33rd International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, 2021, 107 doi: 10.23919/ISPSD50666.2021.9452286
[10]
Fukunaga S, Takayama H, Hikihara T. A study on switching surge voltage suppression of SiC MOSFET by digital active gate drive. 2021 IEEE 12th Energy Conversion Congress & Exposition, 2021 doi: 10.1109/ECCE-Asia49820.2021.9479030
[11]
Agarwal A, Baliga B J, Francois M M A, et al. 3.3 kV 4H-SiC planar-gate MOSFETs manufactured using Gen-5 PRESiCE™ technology in a 4-inch wafer commercial foundry. Southeastcon 2021, 2021, 1 doi: 10.1109/SoutheastCon45413.2021.9401931
[12]
Konstantinov A O, Wahab Q, Nordell N, et al. Ionization rates and critical fields in 4H silicon carbide. Appl Phys Lett, 1997, 71, 90 doi: 10.1063/1.119478
[13]
Tian L X, Yang F, Niu X P, et al. Development and analysis of 6500V SiC power MOSFET. 2021 18th China International Forum on Solid State Lighting & 2021 7th International Forum on Wide Bandgap Semiconductors, 2021, 6 doi: 10.1109/SSLChinaIFWS54608.2021.9675212
[14]
Chanana R K, McDonald K, di Ventra M, et al. Fowler-Nordheim hole tunneling in p-SiC/SiO2 structures. Appl Phys Lett, 2000, 77, 2560 doi: 10.1063/1.1318229
[15]
Fiorenza P, Frazzetto A, Guarnera A, et al. Fowler-Nordheim tunneling at SiO2/4H-SiC interfaces in metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 105, 142108 doi: 10.1063/1.4898009
[16]
Karki U, Peng F Z. Precursors of gate-oxide degradation in silicon carbide MOSFETs. 2018 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, 2018, 857 doi: 10.1109/ECCE.2018.8557354
Fig. 1.  (Color online) Current density and blocking voltage variation with doping concentration and thickness of epitaxial layer.

Fig. 2.  (Color online) Schematic cross-section of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET.

Fig. 3.  (Color online) 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET devices on the 6-inch wafer.

Fig. 4.  (Color online) Comparison of output current of five chips on three wafers.

Fig. 5.  (Color online) Comparison of output, transfer and derivative parameters of five cell structures. (a) Output characteristic curves. (b) Transfer characteristic curves. (c) Transconductance comparison of different channel lengths. (d) Cell transconductance comparison of different JFET widths.

Fig. 6.  (Color online) Breakdown characteristics of test pattern gate oxide capacitors.

Fig. 7.  (Color online) The transforming curves of the gate oxide capacitor I–V curves.

Fig. 8.  (Color online) The relationship between barrier height and slope.

Fig. 9.  (Color online) 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET package layout and outline.

Fig. 10.  High temperature gate bias reliability. (a) Forward gate voltage test results. (b) Reverse gate voltage test results.

Fig. 11.  The results of high temperature reverse bias reliability.

Table 1.   Epitaxial layer thickness and doping concentration.

NumberThickness (μm)Doping (1015 cm−3)t/(Ndqμ)
#164.71.2934.1
#262.31.1636.5
#362.51.2234.8
DownLoad: CSV

Table 2.   Cell parameter table.

Cell numberChannel length (μm)Width of JFET region (μm)
C10.754
C21.254
C314
C413
C515
DownLoad: CSV

Table 3.   Chip yield of 3 wafers.

#1#2#3
C136.36%54.55%61.90%
C236.36%54.55%57.14%
C340.91%54.55%38.10%
C431.82%50.00%42.86%
C554.55%63.64%52.38%
DownLoad: CSV
[1]
Sun B X, Xie R B, Yu C, et al. Structural characterization of SiC nanoparticles. J Semicond, 2017, 38, 103002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/10/103002
[2]
Zeng C, Deng L F, Li Z J, et al. Experimental comparison of SiC GTO and ETO for pulse power applications. J Semicond, 2018, 39, 124017 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/39/12/124017
[3]
Wolfspeed company C4D40120D datasheet [EB/OL] (2019-6-17) [2020-3-2]. https://www.wolfspeed.com/power/products/sic-schottky-diodes
[4]
Rohm company SCT2450KEHR datasheet [EB/OL] (2019-2-22). https://www.rohm.com.cn/products/sic-power-devices/sic-mosfet
[5]
Infineon company AIMW120R035M1H datasheet [EB/OL] (2019-2-22). https://www.infineon.com/cms/cn/product/power/mosfet/silicon-carbide/discretes/aimw120r035m1h
[6]
Mainali K, Wang R X, Sabate J, et al. Current sharing and overvoltage issues of paralleled SiC MOSFET modules. 2019 IEEE Energy Convers Congr Expo ECCE, 2019, 2413 doi: 10.1109/ECCE.2019.8912526
[7]
Chen J J, Jiang X, Li Z J, et al. Investigation on effects of thermal stress on SiC MOSFET degradation through power cycling tests. 2020 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2020, 1106 doi: 10.1109/APEC39645.2020.9124249
[8]
Bencherif H, Yousfi A, Dehimi L, et al. Analysis of Al2O3 high-k gate dielectric effect on the electrical characteristics of a 4H-SiC low-power MOSFET. 2019 1st International Conference on Sustainable Renewable Energy Systems and Applications, 2019, 1 doi: 10.1109/ICSRESA49121.2019.9182412
[9]
Wirths S, Mihaila A, Romano G, et al. Study of 1.2kV high-k SiC power MOSFETS under harsh repetitive switching conditions. 2021 33rd International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, 2021, 107 doi: 10.23919/ISPSD50666.2021.9452286
[10]
Fukunaga S, Takayama H, Hikihara T. A study on switching surge voltage suppression of SiC MOSFET by digital active gate drive. 2021 IEEE 12th Energy Conversion Congress & Exposition, 2021 doi: 10.1109/ECCE-Asia49820.2021.9479030
[11]
Agarwal A, Baliga B J, Francois M M A, et al. 3.3 kV 4H-SiC planar-gate MOSFETs manufactured using Gen-5 PRESiCE™ technology in a 4-inch wafer commercial foundry. Southeastcon 2021, 2021, 1 doi: 10.1109/SoutheastCon45413.2021.9401931
[12]
Konstantinov A O, Wahab Q, Nordell N, et al. Ionization rates and critical fields in 4H silicon carbide. Appl Phys Lett, 1997, 71, 90 doi: 10.1063/1.119478
[13]
Tian L X, Yang F, Niu X P, et al. Development and analysis of 6500V SiC power MOSFET. 2021 18th China International Forum on Solid State Lighting & 2021 7th International Forum on Wide Bandgap Semiconductors, 2021, 6 doi: 10.1109/SSLChinaIFWS54608.2021.9675212
[14]
Chanana R K, McDonald K, di Ventra M, et al. Fowler-Nordheim hole tunneling in p-SiC/SiO2 structures. Appl Phys Lett, 2000, 77, 2560 doi: 10.1063/1.1318229
[15]
Fiorenza P, Frazzetto A, Guarnera A, et al. Fowler-Nordheim tunneling at SiO2/4H-SiC interfaces in metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 105, 142108 doi: 10.1063/1.4898009
[16]
Karki U, Peng F Z. Precursors of gate-oxide degradation in silicon carbide MOSFETs. 2018 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, 2018, 857 doi: 10.1109/ECCE.2018.8557354
1

Impact of underlap spacer region variation on electrostatic and analog performance of symmetrical high-k SOI FinFET at 20 nm channel length

Neeraj Jain, Balwinder Raj

Journal of Semiconductors, 2017, 38(12): 122002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/12/122002

2

Influences of ICP etching damages on the electronic properties of metal field plate 4H-SiC Schottky diodes

Hui Wang, Yingxi Niu, Fei Yang, Yong Cai, Zehong Zhang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2015, 36(10): 104006. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/36/10/104006

3

Analytical modeling and simulation of germanium single gate silicon on insulator TFET

T. S. Arun Samuel, N. B. Balamurugan

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(3): 034002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/3/034002

4

The influence of the channel electric field distribution on the polarization Coulomb field scattering in AlN/GaN heterostructure field-effect transistors

Yingxia Yu, Zhaojun Lin, Yuanjie Lü, Zhihong Feng, Chongbiao Luan, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(12): 124007. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/12/124007

5

Analytical model for subthreshold current and subthreshold swing of short-channel double-material-gate MOSFETs with strained-silicon channel on silicon-germanium substrates

Pramod Kumar Tiwari, Gopi Krishna Saramekala, Sarvesh Dubey, Anand Kumar Mukhopadhyay

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(10): 104002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/10/104002

6

Comparative study of leakage power in CNTFET over MOSFET device

Sanjeet Kumar Sinha, Saurabh Chaudhury

Journal of Semiconductors, 2014, 35(11): 114002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/35/11/114002

7

Effect of tunneling current on the noise characteristics of a 4H-SiC Read Avalanche diode

Deepak K. Karan, Pranati Panda, G. N. Dash

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(1): 014001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/1/014001

8

Flicker and thermal noise in an n-channel underlap DG FinFET in a weak inversion region

Sudhansu Kumar Pati, Hemant Pardeshi, Godwin Raj, N Mohankumar, Chandan Kumar Sarkar, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(2): 024002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/2/024002

9

Analysis on the positive dependence of channel length on ESD failure current of a GGNMOS in a 5 V CMOS

Daoxun Wu, Lingli Jiang, Hang Fan, Jian Fang, Bo Zhang, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2013, 34(2): 024004. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/34/2/024004

10

Nickel ohmic contacts of high-concentration P-implanted 4H-SiC

Liu Chunjuan, Liu Su, Feng Jingjing, Wu Rong

Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(3): 036002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/33/3/036002

11

Peltier effect in doped silicon microchannel plates

Ci Pengliang, Shi Jing, Wang Fei, Xu Shaohui, Yang Zhenya, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(12): 122003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/12/122003

12

Optical and electrical properties of porous silicon layer formed on the textured surface by electrochemical etching

Ou Weiying, Zhao Lei, Diao Hongwei, Zhang Jun, Wang Wenjing, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2011, 32(5): 056002. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/32/5/056002

13

Visible photoluminescence of porous silicon covered with an HfON dielectric layer

Jiang Ran, Zhang Yan

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(8): 082003. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/8/082003

14

Prediction model for the diffusion length in silicon-based solar cells

Cheknane A, Benouaz T

Journal of Semiconductors, 2009, 30(7): 072001. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/30/7/072001

15

A Simple Method of Surface Parameter Extraction for Gate Schottky Contact in 4H-SiC MESFETs

Lü Hongliang, Zhang Yimen, Zhang Yuming, Che Yong, Sun Ming, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(3): 458-460.

16

Fabrication of n+ Polysilicon Ohmic Contacts with a Heterojunction Structure to n-Type 4H-Silicon Carbide

Guo Hui, Feng Qian, Tang Xiaoyan, Zhang Yimen, Zhang Yuming, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(4): 637-640.

17

Laterally Electrostatically Driven Poly 3C-SiC Folded-Beam Resonant Microstructures

Wang Liang, Zhao Yongmei, Ning Jin, Sun Guosheng, Wang Lei, et al.

Journal of Semiconductors, 2008, 29(8): 1453-1456.

18

Evidence of the Role of Carbon Vacancies in Nickel-Based Ohmic Contacts to n-Type Silicon Carbide

Guo Hui, Zhang Yimen, Zhang Yuming

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2007, 28(1): 5-9.

19

Accurate Interconnection Length and Routing Channel Width Estimates for FPGAs

Gao Haixia, Ma Xiaohua, Yang Yintang

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2006, 27(7): 1196-1200.

20

Design and Realization of Resonant Tunneling Diodes with New Material Structure

Wang Jianlin, Wang Liangchen, Zeng Yiping, Liu Zhongli, Yang Fuhua, et al.

Chinese Journal of Semiconductors , 2005, 26(1): 1-5.

1. Zhang, G., Shen, Z., Chen, Y. et al. A light-emitting-diodes-integrated silicon carbide insulated gate bipolar transistor. Semiconductor Science and Technology, 2025, 40(6): 065002. doi:10.1088/1361-6641/ada468
2. Kim, H.-C., Janardhanam, V., Pokhrel, S. et al. Epilayer thickness effect on the electrical and breakdown characteristics of vertical β-Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diode. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2024.127941
3. Wang, Y., Deng, E., Wang, Z. et al. The Influence Mechanism of Humidity on the Chip Solder Layer Thermal Resistance of Power Semiconductor Devices | [湿度对功率半导体器件芯片焊料热阻的影响机理]. Diangong Jishu Xuebao Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2024, 39(12): 3691-3704. doi:10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.230418
4. Wang, X., Tao, X., Zhan, L. et al. Design of Wide Voltage Range DC–DC Converter Based on SiC MOSFET. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 2023. doi:10.1007/978-981-99-4334-0_74
  • Search

    Advanced Search >>

    GET CITATION

    Lixin Tian, Zechen Du, Rui Liu, Xiping Niu, Wenting Zhang, Yunlai An, Zhanwei Shen, Fei Yang, Xiaoguang Wei. Influence of epitaxial layer structure and cell structure on electrical performance of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(8): 082802. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/8/082802
    L X Tian, Z C Du, R Liu, X P Niu, W T Zhang, Y L An, Z W Shen, F Yang, X G Wei. Influence of epitaxial layer structure and cell structure on electrical performance of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET[J]. J. Semicond, 2022, 43(8): 082802. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/8/082802
    shu

    Export: BibTex EndNote

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 1608 Times PDF downloads: 115 Times Cited by: 4 Times

    History

    Received: 08 March 2022 Revised: 02 April 2022 Online: Accepted Manuscript: 26 May 2022Corrected proof: 27 May 2022Uncorrected proof: 30 May 2022Published: 01 August 2022

    Catalog

      Email This Article

      User name:
      Email:*请输入正确邮箱
      Code:*验证码错误
      Lixin Tian, Zechen Du, Rui Liu, Xiping Niu, Wenting Zhang, Yunlai An, Zhanwei Shen, Fei Yang, Xiaoguang Wei. Influence of epitaxial layer structure and cell structure on electrical performance of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(8): 082802. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/8/082802 ****L X Tian, Z C Du, R Liu, X P Niu, W T Zhang, Y L An, Z W Shen, F Yang, X G Wei. Influence of epitaxial layer structure and cell structure on electrical performance of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET[J]. J. Semicond, 2022, 43(8): 082802. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/8/082802
      Citation:
      Lixin Tian, Zechen Du, Rui Liu, Xiping Niu, Wenting Zhang, Yunlai An, Zhanwei Shen, Fei Yang, Xiaoguang Wei. Influence of epitaxial layer structure and cell structure on electrical performance of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(8): 082802. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/8/082802 ****
      L X Tian, Z C Du, R Liu, X P Niu, W T Zhang, Y L An, Z W Shen, F Yang, X G Wei. Influence of epitaxial layer structure and cell structure on electrical performance of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET[J]. J. Semicond, 2022, 43(8): 082802. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/8/082802

      Influence of epitaxial layer structure and cell structure on electrical performance of 6.5 kV SiC MOSFET

      DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/8/082802
      More Information
      • Lixin Tian:received her PhD from Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2017. She then joined Global Energy Interconnection Research Institute Co., Ltd. She is a senior engineer now. Her research focuses on high voltage silicon carbide power electronics devices
      • Zechen Du:received his master's degree from North China Electric Power University in 2021. He is now a research and development engineer of Smart Grid Research Institute Co., Ltd. The main research direction is the simulation and testing of high-voltage silicon carbide devices
      • Fei Yang:received his PhD from Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2006. In 2011, he joined the Global Energy Interconnection Research Institute as professor. His research focuses on high voltage silicon carbide power electronic devices
      • Corresponding author: tianlixin0526@163.comyangsenji@163.com
      • Received Date: 2022-03-08
      • Revised Date: 2022-04-02
      • Available Online: 2022-05-26

      Catalog

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return
        Return